William Hepburn Russell Lumsden Scotland Has a Proud History of Nurturing Distinguished Contributors to Our Understanding of Disease in the Tropics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Hepburn Russell Lumsden Scotland Has a Proud History of Nurturing Distinguished Contributors to Our Understanding of Disease in the Tropics William Hepburn Russell Lumsden Scotland has a proud history of nurturing distinguished contributors to our understanding of disease in the tropics. Among these must be numbered Russell Lumsden, medical entomologist, virologist and parasitologist, but above all a man with boundless enthusiasm for the entire natural world. Russell became a keen naturalist while still at school. Born in Forfar on 27 March, 1914, he moved with his family to Darlington in 1919 when his father became Schools’ Medical Officer for Durham County. He was educated at the Queen Elizabeth Grammar School there, but in 1931 he was awarded a Carnegie Scholarship to read Zoology at Glasgow University under Sir John Graham Kerr. Russell took part in successive student expeditions to Canna in the Inner Hebrides and wrote detailed reports on the entomology of these and on various projects in marine biology. His dedication to natural history is splendidly illustrated by a paper in The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine, recounting how, while sunning himself on a jetty at Lake Windermere after swimming, he found an old nail and kept a tally of the different prey of pond skaters by making scratches on the woodwork. After graduation with First Class Honours, Russell went on to qualify in medicine at Glasgow and wrote articles for Surgo, the Glasgow University Medical Journal, acting as its editor in 1938. His companion in all his student activities was Alexander J Haddow, (later FRSE, FRS): both were later to become world authorities on mosquito- borne disease. After receiving his medical degree in 1938, Russell was awarded a Medical Research Council Fellowship for work at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. The MRC wished to promote research on drug treatment (chemotherapy) of tropical diseases, an endeavour in which the Liverpool School under Warrington Yorke was particularly distinguished. So, after taking the Diploma in Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Russell began to look at the effect of antimalarial drugs on the development of mosquito-infecting stages of the malaria parasite in the laboratory. But with the outbreak of World War II in 1939, of necessity his interest in malaria became more directed to mosquito transmission of the disease in the field. In 1941 he joined the Royal Army Medical Corps on the staff of No 3 Malaria Field Laboratory, later becoming its commanding officer and rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. The main task of the Laboratory was to investigate the malaria hazard to troops advancing into new territory. As a threat to health and survival, malaria assumes even greater importance in times of war. Russell saw active service in the Eastern Mediterranean, North African and Italian Campaigns, ending up in India in preparation for the Allied landings in Malaysia. His duties required extensive travel, often on solitary expeditions to remote places, and on dangerous ones to forward areas; in Sicily he miraculously survived when the truck in which he was travelling was blown to pieces by a land mine. The extensive London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Memoir Anophelism and Malaria in Transjordan and in the neighbouring parts of Palestine and Syria that he later (1950) published (with Jacob Yofe), exemplifies Russell’s inexhaustable capacity for amassing relevant data and the thoroughness of his ecological approach to vector-borne disease transmission. The report that he wrote for Advanced Headquarters on Malaria in Malaya, in anticipation of the 14th Army attack, was equally breathtaking in its scholarship, but never put to use as Allied landings were cancelled when the Japanese surrendered following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. After demobilisation in 1946, Russell took up a MRC Senior Research Fellowship in Medical Entomology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Here he met and married Pamela Bartram, a librarian at the School, who was to be his devoted companion for the rest of his life. He continued work he had started in Liverpool on factors affecting the biting activity of Aedes aegypti, the mosquito transmitting the virus of yellow fever in the urban environment. A year later he entered the Colonial Medical Research Service and joined the staff of the East African Virus Research Institute (EAVRI) in Entebbe, Uganda, as entomologist, alongside his friend of Glasgow student days, Alex Haddow, who later became its Director. Yellow fever wreaks havoc in urban populations when Aedes aegypti is around to transmit it. EAVRI had originally been set up by the Rockefeller Foundation to answer the question “Where does the virus of yellow fever hide between epidemics?” Based in Entebbe and a field station in Bwamba, just to the west of the Ruwenzori, the Institute was largely concerned with the investigation of the cycles of maintenance of the yellow fever virus in the forest environment and the avenues by which it entered the human population. Russell was soon in his element as a naturalist investigating possible transmission routes for the virus. He studied the biting patterns of forest canopy mosquitoes in relation to the behaviour of monkeys and bush babies which, he demonstrated, served as reservoirs of the human disease. He also sorted out those mosquitoes that had a predilection for humans - and Aedes africanus emerged as the main culprit. The Rockefeller had their answer! Over time, however, his interests became more virus-centred. He learned techniques for the isolation and identification of viruses, and in the laboratory, he isolated and characterised several viruses of medical importance. A WHO Fellowship for visiting virus laboratories in Canada and the USA assisted his conversion. He came to regard concepts of purification, standardisation and preservation of infective agents as essential prerequisites for critical study of their epidemiology - conclusions that profoundly influenced the rest of his career as a scientist. In 1957, while serving as Assistant Director of EAVRI, Russell was appointed Director of the East African Trypanosomiasis Research Organisation (EATRO) and forsook viruses for protozoan parasites. He embarked immediately on a radical revision of the Organisation’s activities. These covered the diseases caused by the tsetse fly-transmitted trypanosomes, blood-dwelling protozoa responsible for sleeping sickness in humans and the wasting disease nagana in livestock. For a start he did not like EATRO’s activities being split discipline-wise between three stations geographically distant from one another. His EAVRI experience had taught him that research on vector-borne disease demands close interaction of experts on pathogen, host and vector, not their isolation from one another, so he concentrated all the Organisation’s staff at Tororo in Uganda. In addition, despite his entomological background, he believed that the time had come to break away from preoccupation with the tsetse fly vector and expand research on the trypanosome itself and on the mammalian host’s immune response to it. This was a brave move. In medical science, understanding of the mammalian immune response was currently deepening rapidly. But since pioneering work at the beginning of the century, it had been known that while trypanosomes induce a powerful antibody response to their presence, these parasites can repeatedly change the nature of the antigen inducing the response and so evade immune destruction. In this way they give rise to a chronic relapsing infection in the blood. This ability of the parasite to undergo ‘antigenic variation’ was seen as an insurmountable barrier to much-needed vaccination against trypanosomiasis in both man and beast. The nature of this variation was a complete mystery. What little recent research had been done on it had been conducted on old laboratory isolates, syringe-passaged through rodents for decades with ever-increasing virulence. Such parasites bore about as much resemblance to their wild ancestors as a chihuahua does to a wolf. In addition there was the problem of standardising test materials to compare the antigens of trypanosomes at different points in an infection. At EATRO, however, Russell had ready access to recent trypanosome isolates from patients and sick animals, and he quickly introduced the novel practice of cryopreservation (deep freezing of living material) to set up a bank of such isolates, later termed ‘stabilates’. He devoted much time to developing the technique so as to ensure that stabilate populations were truly frozen in time, thus preserving their antigenic character and infectivity indefinitely. In this way he solved the standardisation problem. He became fascinated by the variable infectivity of trypanosomes and, drawing on his experience in virology, suggested that their infective properties should be measured as if they were invisible viruses. As a visiting researcher at EATRO in 1960, the writer was enthralled by the atmosphere of excitement and enthusiasm that the new director had generated in the laboratories. In 1962 Russell became a Member of the Expert Advisory Panel on Parasitic Diseases of the World Health Organisation. But Ugandan independence was looming, and in 1963 he had to make way for a native African director. He returned to the UK and accepted a lectureship in the Department of Bacteriology of the Medical School, Edinburgh University. Here he met the veterinarian John Herbert and they struck up an alliance to pursue the nature of trypanosome antigenic variation further. This was made possible by Sir Alex Robertson inviting Russell to head an Applied Protozoology Unit in his new Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine at Easter Bush. A basic question concerning trypanosome antigenic variation was whether it was due to survival of genetic mutants in the face of host antibody attack, or was the result of phenotypic change in a genetically constant population of trypanosomes, possibly induced by host antibody. Study of the pattern of switching from one antigenic type to another in relapsing clone infections was an obvious start to answering this question.
Recommended publications
  • Zika Virus Outside Africa Edward B
    Zika Virus Outside Africa Edward B. Hayes Zika virus (ZIKV) is a flavivirus related to yellow fever, est (4). Serologic studies indicated that humans could also dengue, West Nile, and Japanese encephalitis viruses. In be infected (5). Transmission of ZIKV by artificially fed 2007 ZIKV caused an outbreak of relatively mild disease Ae. aegypti mosquitoes to mice and a monkey in a labora- characterized by rash, arthralgia, and conjunctivitis on Yap tory was reported in 1956 (6). Island in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. This was the first ZIKV was isolated from humans in Nigeria during time that ZIKV was detected outside of Africa and Asia. The studies conducted in 1968 and during 1971–1975; in 1 history, transmission dynamics, virology, and clinical mani- festations of ZIKV disease are discussed, along with the study, 40% of the persons tested had neutralizing antibody possibility for diagnostic confusion between ZIKV illness to ZIKV (7–9). Human isolates were obtained from febrile and dengue. The emergence of ZIKV outside of its previ- children 10 months, 2 years (2 cases), and 3 years of age, ously known geographic range should prompt awareness of all without other clinical details described, and from a 10 the potential for ZIKV to spread to other Pacific islands and year-old boy with fever, headache, and body pains (7,8). the Americas. From 1951 through 1981, serologic evidence of human ZIKV infection was reported from other African coun- tries such as Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, Central African n April 2007, an outbreak of illness characterized by rash, Republic, Sierra Leone (10), and Gabon, and in parts of arthralgia, and conjunctivitis was reported on Yap Island I Asia including India, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, in the Federated States of Micronesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Chikungunya Virus, Epidemiology, Clinics and Phylogenesis: a Review
    Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine (2014)925-932 925 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect IF: 0.926 Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine journal homepage:www.elsevier.com/locate/apjtm Document heading doi:10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60164-4 Chikungunya virus, epidemiology, clinics and phylogenesis: A review Alessandra Lo Presti1, Alessia Lai2, Eleonora Cella1, Gianguglielmo Zehender2, Massimo Ciccozzi1,3* 1Department of Infectious Parasitic and Immunomediated Diseases, Epidemiology Unit, Reference Centre on Phylogeny, Molecular Epidemiology and Microbial Evolution (FEMEM), Istituto Superiore di Sanita`, Rome, Italy 2Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, L. Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy 3University Campus-Biomedico, Rome, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Chikungunya virus is a mosquito-transmitted alphavirus that causes chikungunya fever, a febrile Received 14 April 2014 illness associated with severe arthralgia and rash. Chikungunya virus is transmitted by culicine Received in revised form 15 July 2014 mosquitoes; Chikungunya virus replicates in the skin, disseminates to liver, muscle, joints, Accepted 15 October 2014 lymphoid tissue and brain, presumably through the blood. Phylogenetic studies showed that the Available online 20 December 2014 Indian Ocean and the Indian subcontinent epidemics were caused by two different introductions of distinct strains of East/Central/South African genotype of CHIKV. The paraphyletic grouping Keywords: of African CHIK viruses supports the historical
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Infection of Aedes Aegypti, Ae. Albopictus and Culex Spp. with Zika Virus in Medellin, Colombia Infección Natural De Aedes Aegypti, Ae
    Investigación original Natural infection of Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus and Culex spp. with Zika virus in Medellin, Colombia Infección natural de Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus y Culex spp. con virus Zika en Medellín, Colombia Juliana Pérez-Pérez1 CvLAC, Raúl Alberto Rojo-Ospina2, Enrique Henao3, Paola García-Huertas4 CvLAC, Omar Triana-Chavez5 CvLAC, Guillermo Rúa-Uribe6 CvLAC Abstract Fecha correspondencia: Introduction: The Zika virus has generated serious epidemics in the different Recibido: marzo 28 de 2018. countries where it has been reported and Colombia has not been the exception. Revisado: junio 28 de 2019. Although in these epidemics Aedes aegypti traditionally has been the primary Aceptado: julio 5 de 2019. vector, other species could also be involved in the transmission. Methods: Mosquitoes were captured with entomological aspirators on a monthly ba- Forma de citar: sis between March and September of 2017, in four houses around each of Pérez-Pérez J, Rojo-Ospina the 250 entomological surveillance traps installed by the Secretaria de Sa- RA, Henao E, García-Huertas lud de Medellin (Colombia). Additionally, 70 Educational Institutions and 30 P, Triana-Chavez O, Rúa-Uribe Health Centers were visited each month. Results: 2 504 mosquitoes were G. Natural infection of Aedes captured and grouped into 1045 pools to be analyzed by RT-PCR for the aegypti, Ae. albopictus and Culex detection of Zika virus. Twenty-six pools of Aedes aegypti, two pools of Ae. spp. with Zika virus in Medellin, albopictus and one for Culex quinquefasciatus were positive for Zika virus. Colombia. Rev CES Med 2019. Conclusion: The presence of this virus in the three species and the abundance 33(3): 175-181.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Non-Sylvatic Transmission of Yellow Fever Between Non-Human Primates in São Paulo City, Brazil, 2017–2018
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Possible non‑sylvatic transmission of yellow fever between non‑human primates in São Paulo city, Brazil, 2017–2018 Mariana Sequetin Cunha1*, Rosa Maria Tubaki2, Regiane Maria Tironi de Menezes2, Mariza Pereira3, Giovana Santos Caleiro1,4, Esmenia Coelho3, Leila del Castillo Saad5, Natalia Coelho Couto de Azevedo Fernandes6, Juliana Mariotti Guerra6, Juliana Silva Nogueira1, Juliana Laurito Summa7, Amanda Aparecida Cardoso Coimbra7, Ticiana Zwarg7, Steven S. Witkin4,8, Luís Filipe Mucci3, Maria do Carmo Sampaio Tavares Timenetsky9, Ester Cerdeira Sabino4 & Juliana Telles de Deus3 Yellow Fever (YF) is a severe disease caused by Yellow Fever Virus (YFV), endemic in some parts of Africa and America. In Brazil, YFV is maintained by a sylvatic transmission cycle involving non‑human primates (NHP) and forest canopy‑dwelling mosquitoes, mainly Haemagogus‑spp and Sabethes-spp. Beginning in 2016, Brazil faced one of the largest Yellow Fever (YF) outbreaks in recent decades, mainly in the southeastern region. In São Paulo city, YFV was detected in October 2017 in Aloutta monkeys in an Atlantic Forest area. From 542 NHP, a total of 162 NHP were YFV positive by RT-qPCR and/or immunohistochemistry, being 22 Callithrix-spp. most from urban areas. Entomological collections executed did not detect the presence of strictly sylvatic mosquitoes. Three mosquito pools were positive for YFV, 2 Haemagogus leucocelaenus, and 1 Aedes scapularis. In summary, YFV in the São Paulo urban area was detected mainly in resident marmosets, and synanthropic mosquitoes were likely involved in viral transmission. Yellow Fever virus (YFV) is an arbovirus member of the Flavivirus genus, family Flaviviridae and the causative agent of yellow fever (YF)1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera: Culicidae). Cah
    14 October 1986 PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 88(4), 1986, pp. 764-776 AEDES (STEGOMYIA) CORNETI, A NEW SPECIES OF THE AFRICANUS SUBGROUP (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) ’ YIAU-MIN HUANG Systematics of Aedes Mosquitoes Project, Department of Entomology, Smith- sonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. Abstract.-Adults of both sexes and the larva and pupa of Aedes (Stegomyia) cornetin. sp. from Sierra Leone are described and illustrated. Diagnostic characters for separating the adults of Ae. corneti from closely allied species are given. The distribution of Ae. corneti is based on examined specimens. A new species of Aedes(Stegomyia) belonging to the africanus subgroup of the aegypti group was recently collected while conducting field work in Sierra Leone in 1984. This new species, which is extremely similar in overall habitus to adults ofAedes(Stegomyia) africanus(Theobald), 190 1, was found also among specimens misidentified as Ae. africanus from the Services Scientifiques Centraux, Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer (ORSTOM), Institut Pasteur, Paris (PIP) and the British Museum (Natural History) collections. In view of the medical importance of several species in the africanus subgroup and the similarity of this new species with Ae. africanus(Theobald), it is desirable to describe the new species here to make its name available and to avoid future confusion between it and Ae. africanus. Because nothing is known about its biting habits and its potential as vector of human pathogens, it is hoped that this paper will stimulate investigations on these subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is based on specimens collected by the Systematics of Aedes Mos- quitoes Project (SAMP), Department of Entomology, National Museum of Nat- ural History, Smithsonian Institution (USNM), and on specimens borrowed from institutions mentioned in the acknowledgments section.
    [Show full text]
  • Chikungunya Virus Emergence Is Constrained in Asia by Lineage-Specific Adaptive Landscapes
    Chikungunya virus emergence is constrained in Asia by lineage-specific adaptive landscapes Konstantin A. Tsetsarkin, Rubing Chen, Grace Leal, Naomi Forrester, Stephen Higgs, Jing Huang, and Scott C. Weaver1 Institute for Human Infections and Immunity, Center for Tropical Diseases and Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555 Edited by Peter Palese, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, and approved March 31, 2011 (received for review December 9, 2010) Adaptation of RNA viruses to a new host or vector species often earlier resulted in an endemic Asian lineage of CHIKV that still results in emergence of new viral lineages. However, lineage- persists there (Fig. S1). specific restrictions on the adaptive processes remain largely un- Since 2004, CHIKV has exploded onto the global scene as a explored. Recently, a Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) lineage of African major emerging pathogen in a series of devastating outbreaks origin emerged to cause major epidemics of severe, persistent, that have infected up to 6.5 million people (11) and have been debilitating arthralgia in Africa and Asia. Surprisingly, this new associated with several thousand human deaths worldwide (12– lineage is actively replacing endemic strains in Southeast Asia that 14). Phylogenetic studies demonstrated that these outbreaks were have been circulating there for 60 y. This replacement process is associated with at least three independent CHIKV lineages that associated with adaptation of the invasive CHIKV strains to an emerged almost simultaneously in different parts of the world (15– atypical vector, the Aedes albopictus mosquito that is ubiquitously 20). The major CHIK outbreaks were caused by virus strains of distributed in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Zika-Overview.Pdf
    1 As I’m sure most of you have heard, Zika is an “arboviral”, or mosquito‐borne disease spread primary through the bite of an Aedes species mosquito infected with Zika virus. I’m going to spend the first part of this session providing a background on Zika to make sure that we all have a shared baseline understanding of the disease. You’ll hear about the history of the disease, the current Zika outbreak, and information about transmission, symptoms and effects of Zika. Please keep in mind that while we’ve learned a lot about Zika in the past year, there is still a lot the public health and scientific community doesn’t know. We continue to learn more every day about this disease and new guidelines, information and recommendations are released all the time. The best place for current, up to date information on Zika is our website (azhealth.gov/zika) or the CDC website (cdc.gov/zika) 2 Zika virus first identified in Zika forest in Uganda in a rhesus monkey; testing of mosquitoes identified the vector to be Aedes africanus. 3 Zika was first discovered in a monkey in Zika Forest in Uganda in 1947, where it got it’s name. From 1947 to 2006, numerous studies were done to identify where Zika might be present, and identified evidence of the virus in multiple African and Asian countries. Despite the wide geographic range, only 14 human cases were documented. 4 The first large Zika virus outbreak outside of Africa and Asia occurred in Yap, Micronesia in 2007, shown by the circle and arrow on the map.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Zika Virus Infection of Culex Pipiens Leads to Limited Virus Accumulation in Mosquito Saliva
    viruses Article Forced Zika Virus Infection of Culex pipiens Leads to Limited Virus Accumulation in Mosquito Saliva 1 2, 2 1 Sandra R. Abbo , Chantal B. F. Vogels y , Tessa M. Visser , Corinne Geertsema , Monique M. van Oers 1, Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt 2 and Gorben P. Pijlman 1,* 1 Laboratory of Virology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.R.A.); [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (M.M.v.O.) 2 Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (C.B.F.V.); [email protected] (T.M.V.); [email protected] (C.J.M.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, y New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 19 June 2020 Abstract: Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne pathogen that caused a large outbreak in the Americas in 2015 and 2016. The virus is currently present in tropical areas around the globe and can cause severe disease in humans, including Guillain-Barré syndrome and congenital microcephaly. The tropical yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, is the main vector in the urban transmission cycles of ZIKV. The discovery of ZIKV in wild-caught Culex mosquitoes and the ability of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes to transmit ZIKV in the laboratory raised the question of whether the common house mosquito Culex pipiens, which is abundantly present in temperate regions in North America, Asia and Europe, could also be involved in ZIKV transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Chikungunya Epidemiology Diana P
    Overview of chikungunya epidemiology Diana P. Rojas Department of Biostatistics University of Florida November 29, 2018 Key features of transmission • Chikungunya has been identified in over 60 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. • Transmission mostly by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus • Other mosquitoes in Africa can act as efficient vectors for chikungunya: Aedes dalzieli, Aedes furcifer, Aedes taylori, Aedes africanus, and Aedes luteocephalus. • Incubation period: 4-7 days (2-12 days). • Infectious period humans: 7 days • Extrinsic latent period: mean of 7 days (2 -9 days). • Life expectancy of the mosquitos: 30 days. Serial interval CHIKV Mosquito Mosquito feeds/acquires virus refeeds/transmits virus Extrinsic LP Intrinsic IP 7 days 3-5 days (3-12 days) Viremia Viremia Up to 7 d 0 5 8 15 18 23 Illness Illness IP: 4-7 days Human #1 Human #2 22% asymptomatic infection CHIKV Transmission cycle Weaver SC (2014) Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(6): e2921. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002921 Factors associated with CHIKV transmission • Environmental/ecological conditions • Abundance of mosquito egg laying habitats • Completely naïve populations • Alternate vector(s), new ecological niches involved • Viral genetics / mutations • Attack rates may be explained by: • Surveillance practices • Season of CHIKV introduction into a country or a region • Vector density and activity; • Vector control measures; and lifestyle differences Key features of transmission Indicator Asia and La Reunion Americas R0 3.0-4.2 2-4 Attack Rate % 16.55 – 55.6 % 41% % Asymptomatic infections 3-22% 10-58.3% Overall seroprevalence 38.2 – 75% 13-90% CFR <1% <1% At risk groups Newborns, >55 and >45 and comorbidities comorbidities Persisting CHIKV disease 48.7% 45% Re-emergence of Chikungunya 2004-2015 Weaver SC (2014) Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxorhynchites Species: a Review of Current Knowledge
    insects Review Toxorhynchites Species: A Review of Current Knowledge Claire L. Donald 1,2,* , Padet Siriyasatien 3 and Alain Kohl 2 1 Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK 2 MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland, UK; [email protected] 3 Vector Biology and Vector Borne Disease Research Unit, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-141-330-5263 Received: 10 September 2020; Accepted: 28 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Simple Summary: Mosquitoes are well known to spread diseases when they take a blood meal. However, not all species feed on blood but instead get their nourishment from other sources. One such species is Toxorhynchites, which are a paradox among mosquitoes. These mosquitoes are entirely non-blood feeding and, as a result, are not considered to be harmful to human health. Indeed, since their larvae feed on the larvae of pest species and other aquatic insects, they are a potential counter measure against the spread of mosquito-transmitted diseases. Their effective application has been hampered due to a lack of understanding and inconsistencies in their descriptions. This review aims to build upon previously published information and summarize recent findings to support their use in combating mosquito-transmitted infections. Abstract: The increasing global incidence of mosquito-borne infections is driving a need for effective control methods. Vector populations have expanded their geographical ranges, while increasing resistance to chemical insecticides and a lack of effective treatments or vaccines has meant that the development of vector control methods is essential in the fight against mosquito-transmitted diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley Fever Virus Circulation in Livestock and Wildlife, and Population Dynamics of Potential Vectors, in Northern Kwazulu- Natal, South Africa
    Rift Valley fever virus circulation in livestock and wildlife, and population dynamics of potential vectors, in northern KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa by CARIEN VAN DEN BERGH Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria Promoter: Prof EH Venter Co-promoter: Prof PN Thompson Co-promoter: Prof R Swanepoel August 2019 i DECLARATION I, Carien van den Bergh, student number 28215461 hereby declare that this dissertation, “Rift Valley fever virus circulation in livestock and wildlife, and population dynamics of potential vectors, in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.”, submitted in accordance with the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy (Veterinary Science) degree at University of Pretoria, is my own original work and has not previously been submitted to any other institution of higher learning. All sources cited or quoted in this research paper are indicated and acknowledged with a comprehensive list of references. ............................................................. Carien van den Bergh August 2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the following people: My supervisors, Prof Estelle Venter, Prof Peter Thompson and Prof Bob Swanepoel for their guidance and support. Prof Peter Thompson, Ginette Thompson, Dannet Geldenhuys, Yusuf Ngoshe and Bruce Hay for accompanying me to Ndumo for sample collections. Prof Paulo Almeida and Dr Louwtjie Snyman, for their assistance with the mosquito identification. Ms Karen Ebersohn for assisting me with laboratory work. I would like to acknowledge the kindness and patience of the farmers and herders in the study area, as well as the generous assistance of the State Veterinarian and the Animal Health Technicians of the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Jozini District, and Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife.
    [Show full text]