DOCSLIB.ORG

Structural Response of Drystone Iron Age Brochs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structural Response of Drystone Iron Age Brochs Edinburgh Research Explorer Structural response of drystone Iron Age brochs Citation for published version: Thew, I, Sutherland, A & Theodossopoulos, D 2012, 'Structural response of drystone Iron Age brochs', Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.11.00056 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1680/stbu.11.00056 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings Publisher Rights Statement: © ICE Publishing, 2012. Thew, I., Sutherland, A., & Theodossopoulos, D. (2012). Structural response of Drystone Iron-Age Brochs. Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, 166(6), 1-9[1100056]doi: 10.1680/stbu.11.00056 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 07. Oct. 2021 Structures and Buildings Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Structural response of drystone Iron Age http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/stbu.11.00056 brochs Paper 1100056 Thew, Sutherland and Theodossopoulos Received 01/07/2011 Accepted 08/02/2012 Keywords: brickwork & masonry/history/subsidence ICE Publishing: All rights reserved Structural response of drystone Iron Age brochs j1 Iain Thew MEng, GradIMMM j3 Dimitris Theodossopoulos PhD, SpecArchCons, DipCivEng Graduate Structural Engineer, WMA, South Queensferry, Lecturer in Architectural Technology, School of Architecture, Edinburgh, UK University of Edinburgh, UK j2 Alastair Sutherland MEng, WMA Graduate Structural Engineer, TFT Woodexperts, Ripon, UK j1 j2 j3 Understanding the structural behaviour of the drystone Iron Age brochs – prehistoric circular towers in northern Scotland – is essential for their investigation and conservation, but their chaotic collapse patterns have been studied in a fragmentary manner, primarily as historic evidence by archaeologists. The response of brochs to structural action was simulated by building two scale models and testing them in settlement, a possible source of failure. With the key features carefully reproduced and overall identical dimensions, the effect of variation of basal style between ground-galleried and solid-based, the two main types, was examined. The tests indicated that solid-based brochs can withstand a horizontal displacement at the wall head of twice that of ground-galleried types. The discussion of these tests provides further insight into the effect of the form and features, such as restricted openings or the intramural void. The conoid drystone form showed substantial strength, as large settlement was required to cause the failure of a scale model, suggesting that structural actions alone cannot cause collapse. 1. Introduction The drystone broch conoid towers of the Scottish Highlands and Islands are very complex systems, by pre-historic standards (Armit, 2003). Study of their performance and construction process is important in assessing their evolution and development, as well as in planning compatible repairs or sensitive conservation and reconstruction projects. A key design feature (Figures 1 and 2) is the double-leaf wall that tapers to form a truncated conoid, with very few openings. Local flagstone or volcanic rock was used, producing structures of considerable height (up to 15 m), so presumably their con- struction required a shared awareness of the stability problems when building to such a scale. Currently there is a lack of comprehensive structural under- standing of this typology (Barber, 2009). Most brochs are in a Figure 1. Dun Telve, Glenelg ruined state and only a few have been systematically excavated (Armit and Fojut, 1998; Harding, 2000; MacKie, 1974, 2002) or had their conservation state assessed (privately commissioned this context, only archaeological reports exist that analyse the reports by consultants such as AOC Archaeology for Caisteal facts mainly in order to construct a chronological sequence. Grugaig, Clachtoll, Sallachy). The remains do not allow a clear assessment of the progress of the collapse, and often the study of This project is the first attempt to understand the design and the sequence shows many phases of post-collapse occupation. In stability of brochs using engineering methods and analysis of the 1 Structures and Buildings Structural response of drystone Iron Age brochs Thew, Sutherland and Theodossopoulos Figure 3. Gurness, Orkney (# Crown Copyright: RCAHMS. Licensor www.rcahms.gov.uk. Available from CANMORE (2011)) Building traditions were already established from the earlier Figure 2. Mousa, Shetland (# RCAHMS (John Dewar Collection). Atlantic roundhouses and chambered cairns in the middle of the Licensor www.rcahms.gov.uk. Available from CANMORE (2011)) previous millennium BC. What makes brochs unique within this tradition is their height and certain characteristics linked to scale. performance, and is part of a collaborative research project with While roundhouses are straightforward single-storey buildings, AOC Archaeology as the instigator and industrial partner. 1/15 brochs are far more complex multi-storey structures with some models were built as they permitted the best and most practical quite specific architectural features. simulation of the broch and their masonry bond. Investigating the effects of settlement, rather than dead load, was a relevant choice, There are a few common features between all brochs that are as brochs are often built on problematic ground locations that discussed next and subsequently examined through the tests. could provide a clear failure directly correlated to its cause. The Archaeologists debate about the relevance of some, such as the collection of qualitative observations during the construction scarcement that is considered to support possible timber internal of the model also offered valuable information on drystone structures, but they have not been regarded in this study. technology. 2.1 Height The controlled application of vertical displacement simulates only Of the brochs still standing to a good height, indications show one direction of settlement and does not include the beneficial they would have stood to at least 10 m, with a number, among effect of containment by the soil or a non-linear propagation of which Mousa (Figure 2), exceeding that (Mousa stands at the failure. Two types were studied, the solid-based broch (Dun 13.5 m). While the exact number of brochs that once stood to Telve type, Figure 1) and the ground-galleried broch (Gurness such a significant height is uncertain (MacKie, 2002), the massive type, Figure 3), keeping the overall dimensions the same. scale of the basal remains at broch sites across Scotland suggest Settlement was applied till ultimate collapse, to observe the mass that hundreds were at least capable of supporting walls to of stone retained intact and the appearance of the ruins, but the something close to 10 m. observations were relevant to the performance of the prototypes only until the point when the settling portion detached comple- 2.2 The intra-mural galleries tely. The large settlement confirmed the working hypothesis that The double-leaf construction method is a very recognisable the solid-based broch required more settlement to induce failure, characteristic of the brochs. Either starting at the base (ground- and highlighted that structural actions alone are not capable of galleries) or from a stone platform in the solid-based examples, undermining their strength. two separate walls often run to the top of the building. Intra- mural stairs and galleries made from stone lintels span between 2. Stone features in a broch the two walls. It has been suggested that these stone lintels acted Brochs are part of a strong tradition of drystone roundhouse as props between the two walls, keeping them apart, rather than building in Prehistoric Scotland that is believed to have lasted the bracing effect of modern ties (as they do not bond deeply in between 250 BC and 250 AD (Harding, 2004; MacKie, 2002). the wall). Figure 1 shows this feature of the construction. 2 Structures and Buildings Structural response of drystone Iron Age brochs Thew, Sutherland and Theodossopoulos 2.3 Profile tion and its problems can be found at (Fojut, 1981; Martlew, A distinguishing feature of all the brochs that still stand to a 1982), where it becomes clear that Mousa has a substantial base significant height is the profile. There is a distinct camber that which may have been instrumental in its unique preservation and gradually increases before decreasing and straightening (Figures iconic status. 1 and 2). 3. Selection of the case studies 2.4 A single-entrance passage The literature on brochs was reviewed on the basis of PWB and All brochs have only one opening in the outer wall, the entrance basal style. The different styles or intermediate cells have gener- passage which, in some cases, is flanked by intra-mural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pictish Symbol Stones and Early Cross-Slabs from Orkney
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 144 (2014), PICTISH169–204 SYMBOL STONES AND EARLY CROSS-SLABS FROM ORKNEY | 169 Pictish symbol stones and early cross-slabs from Orkney Ian G Scott* and Anna Ritchie† ABSTRACT Orkney shared in the flowering of interest in stone carving that took place throughout Scotland from the 7th century AD onwards. The corpus illustrated here includes seven accomplished Pictish symbol- bearing stones, four small stones incised with rough versions of symbols, at least one relief-ornamented Pictish cross-slab, thirteen cross-slabs (including recumbent slabs), two portable cross-slabs and two pieces of church furniture in the form of an altar frontal and a portable altar slab. The art-historical context for this stone carving shows close links both with Shetland to the north and Caithness to the south, as well as more distant links with Iona and with the Pictish mainland south of the Moray Firth. The context and function of the stones are discussed and a case is made for the existence of an early monastery on the island of Flotta. While much has been written about the Picts only superb building stone but also ideal stone for and early Christianity in Orkney, illustration of carving, and is easily accessible on the foreshore the carved stones has mostly taken the form of and by quarrying. It fractures naturally into flat photographs and there is a clear need for a corpus rectilinear slabs, which are relatively soft and can of drawings of the stones in related scales in easily be incised, pecked or carved in relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Rune Carving in Northern Scotland. Futhark 8
    Modern Rune Carving in Northern Scotland Andrea Freund and Ragnhild Ljosland (University of the Highlands and Islands) Abstract This article discusses modern runic inscriptions from Orkney and Caithness. It presents various examples, some of which were previously considered “genuine”, and reveals that OR 13 Skara Brae is of modern provenance. Other examples from the region can be found both on boulders or in bedrock and in particular on ancient monuments ranging in date from the Neolithic to the Iron Age. The terminology applied to modern rune carving, in particular the term “forgery”, is examined, and the phenomenon is considered in relation to the Ken sington runestone. Comparisons with modern rune carving in Sweden are made and suggestions are presented as to why there is such an abundance of recently carved inscriptions in Northern Scotland. Keywords: Scotland, Orkney, Caithness, modern runic inscriptions, modern rune carving, OR 13 Skara Brae, Kensington runestone Introduction his article concerns runic inscriptions from Orkney and Caithness Tthat were, either demonstrably or arguably, made in the modern period. The objective is twofold: firstly, the authors aim to present an inventory of modern inscriptions currently known to exist in Orkney and Caith ness. Secondly, they intend to discuss the concept of runic “forgery”. The question is when terms such as “fake” or “forgery” are helpful in de­ scribing a modern runic inscription, and when they are not. Included in the inventory are only those inscriptions which may, at least to an untrained eye, be mistaken for pre­modern. Runes occurring for example on jewellery, souvenirs, articles of clothing, in logos and the Freund, Andrea, and Ragnhild Ljosland.
    [Show full text]
  • Martello Towers Research Project
    Martello Towers Research Project March 2008 Jason Bolton MA MIAI IHBC www.boltonconsultancy.com Conservation Consultant [email protected] Executive Summary “Billy Pitt had them built, Buck Mulligan said, when the French were on the sea”, Ulysses, James Joyce. The „Martello Towers Research Project‟ was commissioned by Fingal County Council and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, with the support of The Heritage Council, in order to collate all known documentation relating to the Martello Towers of the Dublin area, including those in Bray, Co. Wicklow. The project was also supported by Dublin City Council and Wicklow County Council. Martello Towers are one of the most well-known fortifications in the world, with examples found throughout Ireland, the United Kingdom and along the trade routes to Africa, India and the Americas. The towers are typically squat, cylindrical, two-storey masonry towers positioned to defend a strategic section of coastline from an invading force, with a landward entrance at first-floor level defended by a machicolation, and mounting one or more cannons to the rooftop gun platform. The Dublin series of towers, built 1804-1805, is the only group constructed to defend a capital city, and is the most complete group of towers still existing in the world. The report begins with contemporary accounts of the construction and significance of the original tower at Mortella Point in Corsica from 1563-5, to the famous attack on that tower in 1794, where a single engagement involving key officers in the British military became the catalyst for a global military architectural phenomenon. However, the design of the Dublin towers is not actually based on the Mortella Point tower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 561-572 Article 43 2003 The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island Lawson L. Schroeder Philip L. Schroeder Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Schroeder, Lawson L. and Schroeder, Philip L. (2003) "The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 43. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/43 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANCIENT STANDING STONES, VILLAGES AND TOMBS FOUND ON THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LAWSON L. SCHROEDER, D.D.S. PHILIP L. SCHROEDER 5889 MILLSTONE RUN BRYAN COLLEGE STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087 P. O. BOX 7484 DAYTON, TN 37321-7000 KEYWORDS: Orkney Islands, ancient stone structures, Skara Brae, Maes Howe, broch, Ring of Brodgar, Standing Stones of Stenness, dispersion, Babel, famine, Ice Age ABSTRACT The Orkney Islands make up an archipelago north of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • With Carleton Professor Clint Cowan
    August 7-17, 2013 (11 days) with Carleton Professor Clint Cowan The "Old Man of Hoy" stands 450 ft. high on the Isle of Hoy, Orkney Islands. Dear Carleton College Alumni and Friends, I invite you to join Carleton College geologist Clint Cowan ’83 on this unique new hiking tour in Scotland’s little-visited Orkney and Shetland Islands! This is the perfect opportunity to explore on foot Scotland’s Northern Isles' amazing wealth of geological and archaeological sites. Their rocks tell the whole story, spanning almost three billion years. On Shet- land you will walk on an ancient ocean floor, explore an extinct volcano, and stroll across shifting sands. In contrast, Orkney is made up largely of sedimentary rocks, one of the best collections of these sediments to be seen anywhere in the world. Both archipelagoes also have an amazing wealth of archaeological sites dating back 5,000 years. This geological and archaeological saga is worth the telling, and nowhere else can the evidence be seen in more glorious a setting. Above & Bottom: The archaeological site of Jarlshof, dat- ing back to 2500 B.C. Below: A view of the Atlantic from This active land tour features daily hikes that are easy to moderate the northern Shetland island of Unst. in difficulty, so to fully enjoy and visit all the sites on this itinerary one should be in good walking condition (and, obviously, enjoy hiking!). Highlights include: • The “Heart of Neolithic Orkney,” inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1999, including the chambered tomb of Maeshowe, estimated to have been constructed around 2700 B.C.; the 4,000 year old Ring of Brodgar, one of Europe’s finest Neolithic monu- ments; Skara Brae settlement; and associated monuments and stone settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Isurium Brigantum
    Isurium Brigantum an archaeological survey of Roman Aldborough The authors and publisher wish to thank the following individuals and organisations for their help with this Isurium Brigantum publication: Historic England an archaeological survey of Roman Aldborough Society of Antiquaries of London Thriplow Charitable Trust Faculty of Classics and the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge Chris and Jan Martins Rose Ferraby and Martin Millett with contributions by Jason Lucas, James Lyall, Jess Ogden, Dominic Powlesland, Lieven Verdonck and Lacey Wallace Research Report of the Society of Antiquaries of London No. 81 For RWS Norfolk ‒ RF Contents First published 2020 by The Society of Antiquaries of London Burlington House List of figures vii Piccadilly Preface x London W1J 0BE Acknowledgements xi Summary xii www.sal.org.uk Résumé xiii © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2020 Zusammenfassung xiv Notes on referencing and archives xv ISBN: 978 0 8543 1301 3 British Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to this study 1 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data 1.2 Geographical setting 2 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the 1.3 Historical background 2 Library of Congress, Washington DC 1.4 Previous inferences on urban origins 6 The moral rights of Rose Ferraby, Martin Millett, Jason Lucas, 1.5 Textual evidence 7 James Lyall, Jess Ogden, Dominic Powlesland, Lieven 1.6 History of the town 7 Verdonck and Lacey Wallace to be identified as the authors of 1.7 Previous archaeological work 8 this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Dun Telve and Dun Troddan (Glenelg)
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC330 & PIC331 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90152) Taken into State care: 1885 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2004 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE DUN TELVE AND DUN TRODDAN (GLENELG) We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH DUN TELVE AND DUN TRODDAN BRIEF DESCRIPTION The monument comprises two broch towers that are sited less than 500m apart in the valley of Gleann Beag in Glenelg. Dun Telve stands near the river and about one third of its wall still stands to a height of over 10m. Dun Troddan is set on a terrace in the hillside a little further up the Glen. About one third of the wall survives to a height of 7.6m and it is very like its neighbour in structural detail. Each is accessible by a short walk from the road. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview • There is a rich and fascinating antiquarian and later history associated with the discovery and interpretation of broch towers/complex roundhouses as a whole. Early antiquarian drawings exist for these monuments: Alexander Gordon, about 1720; Pennant in 1772. These monuments attracted attention from an early date because they are so well-preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Land, Stone, Trees, Identity, Ambition
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Land, stone, trees, identity, ambition Citation for published version: Romankiewicz, T 2015, 'Land, stone, trees, identity, ambition: The building blocks of brochs', The Archaeological Journal, vol. 173 , no. 1, pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2016.1110771 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/00665983.2016.1110771 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: The Archaeological Journal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Land, Stone, Trees, Identity, Ambition: the Building Blocks of Brochs Tanja Romankiewicz Brochs are impressive stone roundhouses unique to Iron Age Scotland. This paper introduces a new perspective developed from architectural analysis and drawing on new survey, fieldwork and analogies from anthropology and social history. Study of architectural design and constructional detail exposes fewer competitive elements than previously anticipated. Instead, attempts to emulate, share and communicate identities can be detected. The architectural language of the broch allows complex layers of individual preferences, local and regional traditions, and supra-regional communications to be expressed in a single house design.
    [Show full text]
  • Crannogs — These Small Man-Made Islands
    PART I — INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION Islands attract attention.They sharpen people’s perceptions and create a tension in the landscape. Islands as symbols often create wish-images in the mind, sometimes drawing on the regenerative symbolism of water. This book is not about natural islands, nor is it really about crannogs — these small man-made islands. It is about the people who have used and lived on these crannogs over time.The tradition of island-building seems to have fairly deep roots, perhaps even going back to the Mesolithic, but the traces are not unambiguous.While crannogs in most cases have been understood in utilitarian terms as defended settlements and workshops for the wealthier parts of society, or as fishing platforms, this is not the whole story.I am interested in learning more about them than this.There are many other ways to defend property than to build islands, and there are many easier ways to fish. In this book I would like to explore why island-building made sense to people at different times. I also want to consider how the use of islands affects the way people perceive themselves and their landscape, in line with much contemporary interpretative archaeology,and how people have drawn on the landscape to create and maintain long-term social institutions as well as to bring about change. The book covers a long time-period, from the Mesolithic to the present. However, the geographical scope is narrow. It focuses on the region around Lough Gara in the north-west of Ireland and is built on substantial fieldwork in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Quern Replacement and the Origin of the Broths Seamas Caulfield”
    Quern replacement and the origin of the broths Seamas Caulfield” Ever since the broths of the Atlantic Province captured the interest of antiquarians in the last century one of the unanswered questions has been the area in which this unified building and defence tradition originated. In modern studies archaeologists such as Childe (1935) and Hamilton (1968) argued that the concentration of broths in the northern sub-Province indicated that there was the most likely area of origin. MacKie (1965; 1971; 1972) has however argued in a number of papers that the origin of the broths lies in the west where they developed under the stimulus of southern English migrants arriving in the Hebrides in the 1st~century BC. As evidence of this immigration one of the new exotic artefacts which MacKie derives from the Wessex area is the flat rotary querns which he contrasts with the Beehive querns of Southern Scotland and which he sees as clear imports from the south of England. It is intended to deal elsewhere with the absence of any link between the querns of Wessex and those of the Hebrides and the implications of this for the English migrants hypothesis. However a study of the more fundamental contrast between broths with saddle querns and those with rotary querns appears to offer a better basis for estab- lishing the claim of the western or northern area within the Atlantic Province as the area of origin of the broth. One of the merits of the quern as an object of study in this regard is that it is prob- ably the most imperishable and ubiquitous artefact associated with the broths.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Dun Telve Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC330 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90152) Taken into State care: 1885 (Guardianship) Last Reviewed: 2020 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE DUN TELVE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2020 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND
    [Show full text]