Designing Context-Based Teaching Materials by Transforming Authentic Scientific Modelling Practices in Chemistry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Journal of Science Education ISSN: 0950-0693 (Print) 1464-5289 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tsed20 Designing context-based teaching materials by transforming authentic scientific modelling practices in chemistry Gjalt T. Prins, Astrid M.W. Bulte & Albert Pilot To cite this article: Gjalt T. Prins, Astrid M.W. Bulte & Albert Pilot (2018) Designing context-based teaching materials by transforming authentic scientific modelling practices in chemistry, International Journal of Science Education, 40:10, 1108-1135, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1470347 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470347 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 15 May 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 378 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tsed20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 2018, VOL. 40, NO. 10, 1108–1135 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470347 Designing context-based teaching materials by transforming authentic scientific modelling practices in chemistry Gjalt T. Prins , Astrid M.W. Bulte and Albert Pilot Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY One of the challenges of context-based science education is to Received 18 April 2018 construct high quality teaching materials. This paper presents Accepted 24 April 2018 results from a study investigating the heuristic value of an activity- KEYWORDS based instructional framework for transformation of authentic Context-based learning; scientific practices for use in the science classroom, in line with learning activities; cultural cultural historic activity theory (CHAT). The activity-based historical activity theory instructional framework was used to transform the authentic (CHAT) practice of Modelling Human Exposure and Uptake of Chemicals in Consumer Products into a curriculum unit. The transformation was conducted by experienced chemistry teachers well informed about CHAT. The heuristic value was judged on criteria completeness, instructiveness and appreciation. Collected data are designed curriculum materials and a focus group interview. Analysis of the designed curriculum materials indicated that the framework was highly complete and instructive, except for evoking reflection in students. Most important, the framework proved successful in operationalising CHAT into concrete guidelines for educational design. Additionally, the results show that the instructional framework is highly appreciated by the users. Further development of such instructional frameworks is important, since it fosters the construction of high quality context-based curriculum materials. Introduction Increasingly, contexts are being introduced in science curricula in many countries across the world (George & Lubben, 2002; Pilot & Bulte, 2006; Smith, 2011). The central feature of context-based learning environments is the use of realistic contexts as starting point and anchor for learning science, thereby giving significance and meaning to the science- content (Aikenhead, 1994; Bennett, Lubben, & Hogarth, 2007), as well as offering students to become engaged in scientific thinking and practice (Schwartz, Lederman, & Crawford, 2004). However, the success of context-based education is heavily dependent on the quality of the curriculum materials and implementation in classroom. In the special issue on context-based education, Pilot and Bulte (2006) described a number of hindering and fostering factors which are summarised in three categories: CONTACT Gjalt T. Prins [email protected] Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht (De Uithof) © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 1109 . The nature of the design and developmental process, including the cyclic nature of the design and developmental process, the influence of the attitude of teachers as a key factor for success or failure of the innovation and the use of the collected data in the cyclic developmental process; . Key characteristics of the course-design framework, including the quality of the frame- works for context-based chemistry education and the robustness of the design in the formal curriculum; . Conditional circumstances during the development, including the assessment of learn- ing results, requirements from stakeholders in further education and the quality of the team of developers within a systemic organisation. This paper will zoom in on the second category, i.e. the key characteristics of a course- design framework from the perspective of experienced chemistry teachers as designers of context-based curriculum materials. Vos, Taconis, Jochems, and Pilot (2010) studied how beginning and proficient teachers when confronted with context-based materials, failed or succeeded in actually creating context-based learning environments. They argue that for experienced science teachers besides concrete and direct instruction in using the materials, teachers are also required to have knowledge of the rationale behind the materials, and should have the skills necessary to actually create a context-based learning environment while using the materials. However, in many cases teachers do not have access to the resources and information that they need to make pedagogical decisions that reflect the goals and rationale underlying a reform of a curriculum (Loucks-Horsley, Love, Hewson, Stiles, & Mundry, 2003). A course-design framework is intended to bridge the rationale and pedagogical orientation of curriculum reform and the learning environment. Course-design frameworks, also denoted as instructional frameworks, are intended to provide guidelines of the construction of teaching materials, thereby also providing a base for evaluating classroom enactments of designed education. Within the context-based innovation several instructional frameworks have been described and utilised. The Chemistry in Context innovation (Schwartz, 2006) presents a framework in terms of the spider-web metaphor; the information and activities that intro- duce each chapter, student decision-making activities, questions, and tasks; laboratory work; assessments, etc. This pattern of elements constitutes the backbone of teaching and learning. In the Salters Advanced Chemistry project (Bennett & Lubben, 2006), the need-to-know principle has been elaborated in the characteristic three course components: Storylines, Chemical Ideas and the Activity Folder. Each unit is driven by the Storyline. From this, stu- dents are referred to the Activity Folder and Chemical Ideas, which forms the backbone of the students’ mental maps of chemical knowledge through a ‘drip-feed’ approach (spiral cur- riculum). The context-base chemistry innovation in Germany, denoted ‘Chemie im Kontext’, explicitly prescribes a four-phase framework that is used as a guideline for the development of exemplar units (Parchmann et al., 2006). The four phases, i.e. a contact phase, a curiosity phase, an elaboration phase and a phase of deepening and connection, contain essential aspects derived from instructional theories and theories about motivation. In the Industrial Chemistry (Hofstein & Kesner, 2006) movement a pattern is used that is characteristic for all elaborations of the programme: varied-type learning methods and class- room environments (lab, excursion, computer, classroom), and diversity of resources, among others a collection of enrichment materials. In short, all above context-based 1110 G.T.PRINSETAL. innovations consider instructional frameworks important instruments in the curriculum reform process. Nevertheless, there is no in-depth empirical information available about the interaction between teachers and instructional frameworks in the construction of curri- culum materials, or about the extent to which such instructional frameworks guide and facilitate the design activities of teachers (Edelson, 2001). In previous research studies, the authors of this paper developed and used an activity- based instructional framework for the design of curriculum units (Prins, Bulte, & Pilot, 2016), founded on the cultural historic activity theory (CHAT) (Leont’ev, 1978; Vygotsky, 1978). This framework aims to support educational designers in transforming authentic science practices into contexts for learning. We envision the activity-based instructional framework as a cognitive tool to support the educational designer to understand, remem- ber, and address important components of CHAT while developing teaching materials and planning learning activities for students to conduct. The goal of this paper is to investigate the heuristic value of the activity-based instructional framework on criteria completeness, instructiveness and acceptance. Six chemistry teachers, well informed about CHAT, trans- formed the authentic practice of ‘modelling human exposure and uptake of chemicals in consumer products’ into a curriculum unit for use in