Page 1 植物研究雜誌 J. Jpn. Bot. 71: 273-280 (1996) the Leaf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

植物研究雑誌 J. J. Jpn. Bo t. 71: 71: 273-280 (1996) The Leaf Organization of Kummerowia (Leguminosae) Yu IOKAWA ,Tomoyuki NEMOTO and Hiroyoshi OHASHI Biological Biological Institute ,Graduate School of Science , Tohoku University ,Sendai ,980-77 JAPAN (Received (Received on March 18 , 1996) Leaves Leaves of Kummerowia have been described as palmate or as pinnate. In order to clarify leaf the organization ,leaves of Kummerowia were examined morphologically and anatomically. Mo 中hological observations observations revealed that rachis exists between the top of petiole and the pulvinus of terminalleaflet. The rachis differs differs from the pulvinus in having two ridges on the adaxial side and no wrinkle in surface. Though the rachis becomes becomes shorter in upper leaves , it is clearly distinguished from the pulvinus by these extemal features. The leaf organization organization of Kummerowia is therefore regarded as being pinnately trifoliolate. Anatomical observations revealed revealed that the leaf of Kummerowia has a similar vascular system to that in the pinnately trifoliolate leaves of other other leguminous species. The leaf organization of Kummerowi αis identical with those of its allied genera Lespedeza Lespedeza and Campylotropis. The genus Kummerowia comprises two species , Kummerowia has more closer relationship to K. K. striata (Thunb. ex Murray) Schindler and K. Lespedeza than to Cα mpylotropis. st 伊ulacea (Maxim.) Makino. These are naturally Leaves are trifoliolate in those three genera and distributed distributed in East Asia and have been introduced they have been usually described as pinnately widely widely in North America. This genus is included in trifoliolate in Lespedeza (Hutchinson 1964 ,Ohwi the the subtribe Lespedezinae of the tribe Desmodieae 1965 , Isely 1990 , Li and Chen 1995) and together together with allied genera Lespedeza and Campylotropis (Hutchinson 1964 ,Fu 1987 , 1995). ampylotropis C ampylotropis (Ohashi et al. 1981). Taxonomic treat- On the other hand ,trifoliolate leaves of Kummerowia ments ments of these generahave been controversial (N emoto have been described as palmate (Watari 1934 ,Ohwi and and Ohashi 1988) ,and the relationships between them 1965 , Hatusima 1975 ,Isely 1990) or as pinnate (Liu have have been discussed on basis the of the floral nectary 1955 ,YangandHuang 1995). AccordingtoOhashiet (Nemoto and Ohashi 1988) , the inflorescence al. (1 981) ,leaves of the tribe Desmodieae are gener- (Akiyama and Ohba 1985 ,Nemoto and Ohashi 1990 , ally pinnately trifoliolate. 1993 ,1996 ,Nemoto et al. 1995) and restr Ic tion frag- The pinnately trifoliolate leaf is distinguished from ment length polymorphisms of chloroplast DNA the palmately trifoliolate one by the presence of the (Nemoto et al. 1995). Akiyama and Ohba (1 985) rachis above the petiole (Hickey 197 9.). Because each regarded regarded Kummerowia as being distinct from other leaflet has the pulvinus at the base throughout the two genera based on the features of inflorescence , Leguminosae (Dormer 1946) ,the petiole is connected whereas whereas Nemoto and Ohashi (1 988 ,1990 ,1993 , by the rachis with the pulvinus of terminalleaflet in 1996) 1996) and Nemoto et al. (1 995) showed that the pinnately trifoliolate leaf , while it is directly -273 ー 274 植物研究雑誌第71 巻第5 号 平成 8 年 10 月 connected connected with that in the palmately trifoliolate one. Observations Watari Watari (1934) anatomically studied the vascular M orphologic α lobservation A leaf of Kummerowia system system in the petioles and rachises of many legumi- comprises three leaflets. Each leaflet has a pulvinus at nous nous species and pointed out the difference in vascu- the base. We observed the rachis between the top of lar lar system between the pinnately trifoliolate leaf and petiole and the pulvinus ofterminalleaflet (Figs. 1,2, the the palmately trifoliolate one. He regarded K. striata 3). The pulvinus ofterminalleaflet attaches on the top as as having the vascular system in the palmately of the rachis , while that of the lateralleaflet attaches trifoliolate trifoliolate leaf. directly to the top of petiole. The rachis is clearly In In this paper , in order to clarify the leaf organiza- distinguished from the pulvinus by the following tion ,we examined leaves of Kummerowia morpho- differences: the rachis has two ridges running along logically logically and anatomically. the adaxial side ,slender outline and smooth surface , while while the pulvinus has no ridges , but swollen outline Materials Materials and Methods and wrinkled surface. Moreover , the pulvinus falls Leaves Leaves of Kummerowia striata and K. stipulace α down with the terminalleaflet when plants shed their were examined. Typical palmately trifoliolate leaves leaflets , but the rachis remains at the top of petiole. of of Trifolium repens L. were also examined for com- The rachis varies in length ,0.2-1 .4 mm long in K. parison. parison. For mo 叩hological observations , herbarium striata and 0.1 -0 .8 mm long in K. stipulacea. Al- specimens specimens kept in TUS were investigated under a though it becomes shorter in upper leaves in both binocular binocular microscope. Moreover ,FAA-fixed leaves species (Figs. 3,5) , the rachis is clearly distinguished collected collected in the fields (Table 1) were dehydrated in an from the pulvinus by those different features. ethyl ethyl alcohol series ,transferred to isoamyl acetate , Leaves of Trifolium rψens ,which represent a dried dried in a critical point dryer , placed on aluminum typical palmately trifoliolate leaf , don't have the stubs , coated with gold ,and observed by a Hitachi S- rachis and the three pulvini of leaflets are attached 4100 scanning electron microscope. For anatomical directly to the top of petiole (Fig. 4). Leaves of observations ,FAA-fixed materials were dehydrated Kummerowia are clearly different in structure from in in a t-butyl alcohol series ,embedded in paraffin and the palmately trifoliolate leaf. sectioned sectioned at a thickness of 10μm with a rotary Anatomical observation The rachis can be distin- microtome. microtome. Sections were stained with safranin and guished from the pulvinus of terminalleaflet by the fast fast green FCF and examined by a light microscope. shape of the transverse section in K. striata and K. Table Table 1. A list of fresh and F AA -fixed materials examined. Voucher specimens are are all kept in TUS Taxa Taxa Locality & Collector Kummel ・owia Japan ,Miyagi Pref. ,Sendai , Y. Iokawa 5240. stipulacea stipulacea Japan ,Fukushima Pref. ,Hobara 司 machi ,y. Iokawa 5238. Japan ,Fukushima Pref. ,Yabuki-machi , Y. Iokawa 5242. striata K. striata Japan ,Miyagi Pref. ,Sendai , Y. Iokawa 5239. Japan ,Fukushima Pref. ,Miyakoji-mura , Y. Iokawa 5237. Japan ,Fukushima Pref. ,Yabuki-machi , Y. Iokawa 524 1. Tr 扮lium repens Japan ,Miyagi Pref. ,Sendai , Y. Iokawa 5243. October October 1996 Journal of Japanese Botany Vo l. 71 No. 5 275 Figs. Figs. 1 -4. FeatUres of trifoliolate leaves at the top of petiole. 1. Kummer ・owia striata. 2. K. stipulacea , leaf from lower lower part of stem. 3. K. stipulacea , leaf from upper part of stem. 4. Trifolium repens. 1,lateralleaflet; p, petiole; petiole; pl , pulvinus of lateralleaflet; pt ,pulvinus of terminalleaflet; r ,rachis; t,terminalleafle t. Scale bars = 500μm. 276 276 植物研究雑誌第71 巻第5 号 平成 8 年 10 月 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 E E 1.0 5由咽 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 Z4q回~ 0.6 0.6 坤。 目 £z 0.5 0 .4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Leaf Leaf order Fig. Fig. 5. Variation in length rachis of in relation with order of leaf on main stem. 0: Kummerowia striata ,・: K. st 伊ulacea. Rachises were measured on fully-formed leaves of 10 individuals in each each species. A verages were plotted in each order of leaf , from 7th to 18th in K. striata and from 9th 9th to 19th in K. st 伊ulacea ,because leaves below were lost and above were not fully-formed in some some individuals. Vertical bars represent standard deviations. Vouchers: K. striata (Y. Iokawa 5239) , K. stipulacea (Y. Iokawa 5240). stipulacea. stipulacea. The transverse sections of petiole and in the leaf of Kummerowia is shown in Fig. 8A. rachis rachis have two ridges on the adaxial side (Figs. 6A , When the rachis is very short in upper leaves ,it 6B ,6C ,7A ,7B ,7C) ,whilethatofpulvinusiscircular sometimes doesn't have the three vascular bundles (Figs. (Figs. 6D , 7D). but only single vascular bundle because the three Both species have similar vascular system. The vascular bundles fuse together at the top of petiole petiole petiole has three m 吋or vascular bundles ,i.e. ,a me- (Fig. 8B). The whole vascular system in such rachis is dian dian bundle and a pair of lateral bundles (Figs. 6A , similar to that at the top of longer rachis. 7 A). In the top of petiole , the adaxial part of each lateral lateral bundle enters the pulvinus of each lateral Discussion lea f1 et as a single vascular bundle , the transverse Th e rachis is the important mo 中hological charac- section section of which shows a continuous arc (Fig. 7E). teristic for distinguishing the pinnately trifoliolate The three vascular bundles are kept through the rachis leaffrom the palmately trifoliolate one. Because each except except at the top (Figs. 6B , 7B). At the top of rachis , lea f1 et has ・the pulvinus at the base throughout the the the three vascular bundles fuse into a single vascular Leguminosae (Dormer 1946) , the terminal lea f1 et is bundle. bundle. and the bundle shows a continuous arc and connected by the rachis and pulvinus with the petiole gradually gradually concentrates in the center (Figs. 6C , 7C). in the pinnately trifoliolate leaf. The rachis has two This This bundle is kept throughout the pulvinus of termi- ridges on the adaxial side in many leguminous leaves nallea f1 et (Figs.
Recommended publications
  • 20. Tribe DESMODIEAE 116. TRIFIDACANTHUS Merrill, Philipp

    20. Tribe DESMODIEAE 116. TRIFIDACANTHUS Merrill, Philipp

    20. Tribe DESMODIEAE 山蚂蝗族 shan ma huang zu Huang Puhua (黄普华 Huang Pu-hwa); Hiroyoshi Ohashi, Yu Iokawa, Tomoyuki Nemoto Herbs or shrubs, rarely trees or twining. Leaves pinnately 3(–9)-foliolate or 1-foliolate; stipules mostly striate; stipels present or sometimes absent. Flowers in terminal or axillary racemes or arranged into a panicle, rarely an umbel or fascicle. Calyx 4- or 5- toothed or 2-lipped. Wings equal to or exceeding keel and often adherent to it near base. Vexillary filament free or connate with others, sometimes forming a closed tube; anthers uniform. Legumes transversely jointed, sometimes of only 1 article, or rarely 2- valved. Seeds without a strophiole, rarely arillate. About 30 genera and 520–530 species: distributed in tropical, subtropical, and warm-temperate regions, but extending into the cool-temperate and sub-boreal regions of E Asia and North America; 18 genera and 139 species (42 endemic, four introduced) in China. 1a. Stipels absent, rarely present; legumes 1-jointed, 1-seeded, not glochidiate. 2a. Lateral veins of leaflets strict, extending to margin; stipules large, ovate, strongly ribbed ........................... 133. Kummerowia 2b. Lateral veins of leaflets arcuate, not reaching to margin; stipules small, subulate. 3a. Bracts 1-flowered, usually caducous; pedicels articulate below calyx; keel falcate, acute ................... 131. Campylotropis 3b. Bracts 2-flowered, persistent; pedicels not articulate; keel strict, obtuse ..................................................... 132. Lespedeza 1b. Stipels present; legumes usually glochidiate, 2- to several jointed, rarely 1-jointed, 1-seeded. 4a. Branch nodes with 3-fid, hard spines; leaves 1-foliolate ............................................................................... 116. Trifidacanthus 4b. Branch nodes without 3-fid, hard spines; leaves 3(–9)-foliolate, rarely 1-foliolate.
  • Atlas of the Flora of New England: Fabaceae

    Atlas of the Flora of New England: Fabaceae

    Angelo, R. and D.E. Boufford. 2013. Atlas of the flora of New England: Fabaceae. Phytoneuron 2013-2: 1–15 + map pages 1– 21. Published 9 January 2013. ISSN 2153 733X ATLAS OF THE FLORA OF NEW ENGLAND: FABACEAE RAY ANGELO1 and DAVID E. BOUFFORD2 Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2020 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Dot maps are provided to depict the distribution at the county level of the taxa of Magnoliophyta: Fabaceae growing outside of cultivation in the six New England states of the northeastern United States. The maps treat 172 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids, but not forms) based primarily on specimens in the major herbaria of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, with most data derived from the holdings of the New England Botanical Club Herbarium (NEBC). Brief synonymy (to account for names used in standard manuals and floras for the area and on herbarium specimens), habitat, chromosome information, and common names are also provided. KEY WORDS: flora, New England, atlas, distribution, Fabaceae This article is the eleventh in a series (Angelo & Boufford 1996, 1998, 2000, 2007, 2010, 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c) that presents the distributions of the vascular flora of New England in the form of dot distribution maps at the county level (Figure 1). Seven more articles are planned. The atlas is posted on the internet at http://neatlas.org, where it will be updated as new information becomes available. This project encompasses all vascular plants (lycophytes, pteridophytes and spermatophytes) at the rank of species, subspecies, and variety growing independent of cultivation in the six New England states.
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)

    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
  • Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29

    Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29

    Missouriensis Volume 28/29 (2008) In this issue: Improved Status of Auriculate False Foxglove (Agalinis auriculata) in Missouri in 2007 Tim E. Smith, Tom Nagel, and Bruce Schuette ......................... 1 Current Status of Yellow False Mallow (Malvastrum hispidum) in Missouri Tim E. Smith.................................................................................... 5 Heliotropium europaeum (Heliotropiaceae) New to Missouri Jay A. Raveill and George Yatskievych ..................................... 10 Melica mutica (Poaceae) New for the Flora of Missouri Alan E. Brant ................................................................................. 18 Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) New to Missouri Timothy E. Vogt and Paul M. McKenzie ................................. 22 Flora of Galloway Creek Nature Park, Howell County, Missouri Bill Summers .................................................................................. 27 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 28/29 2008 1 IMPROVED STATUS OF AURICULATE FALSE FOXGLOVE (AGALINIS AURICULATA) IN MISSOURI IN 2007 Tim E. Smith Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Tom Nagel Missouri Department of Conservation 701 James McCarthy Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507-2194 Bruce Schuette Missouri Department of Natural Resources Cuivre River State Park 678 State Rt. 147 Troy, MO 63379 Populations of annual plant species are known to have periodic “boom” and “bust” years as well as years when plant numbers more closely approach long-term averages. In tracking populations of plant species of conservation concern (Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2007), there are sometimes also boom years in the number of reports of new populations. Because of reports of five new populations and a surge in numbers of plants at some previously-known sites, 2007 provided encouraging news for the conservation of the auriculate false foxglove [Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake] in Missouri.
  • Don Robinson State Park Species Count: 544

    Don Robinson State Park Species Count: 544

    Trip Report for: Don Robinson State Park Species Count: 544 Date: Multiple Visits Jefferson County Agency: MODNR Location: LaBarque Creek Watershed - Vascular Plants Participants: Nels Holmberg, WGNSS, MONPS, Justin Thomas, George Yatskievych This list was compiled by Nels Holmbeg over a period of > 10 years Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha gracilens slender three-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha monococca (A. gracilescens var. monococca) one-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 1 3 Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia parviflora swamp agrimony Rosaceae 5 -1 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Agrostis perennans upland bent Poaceae/Aveneae 3 1 * Ailanthus altissima tree-of-heaven Simaroubaceae 0 5 * Ajuga reptans carpet bugle Lamiaceae 0 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
  • Korean Lespedeza and in the Leaf Axils All Along the Stem in Contributed By: USDA NRCS Northeast Plant Common Lespedeza

    Korean Lespedeza and in the Leaf Axils All Along the Stem in Contributed By: USDA NRCS Northeast Plant Common Lespedeza

    Plant Fact Sheet Weed information is also available from the KOREAN PLANTS Web site at plants.usda.gov. LESPEDEZA Description Kummerowia stipulacea Korean and common lespedeza (Kummerowia striata) are introduced, annual, warm-season (Maxim.) Makino legumes. Flowers and seeds are borne in the leaf Plant Symbol = KUST axils at the tips of stems and branches in the Korean lespedeza and in the leaf axils all along the stem in Contributed by: USDA NRCS Northeast Plant common lespedeza. Two types of flowers are Materials Program produced. One is readily seen as purple-bluish and the other has no petals and is inconspicuous. Korean lespedeza has a much broader leaflet and stipule than common, and growth is generally larger and coarser. Common lespedeza grows more prostrate. The seed varies from the shiny black of Korean to the stippled seed of common. There are approximately 343,000 seeds per pound of common lespedeza and 240,000 seeds per pound of Korean lespedeza. Adaptation and Distribution Korean is better adapted than common lespedeza in the North because of its shorter life cycle. Both types grow in a pH range of 4.5-7.0, but do best at 6.0-6.5. Common lespedeza (cultivar ‘Kobe’) is more tolerant of acid soils. They both grow in soil textures ranging from sands to clays and at fertility levels from low to high. From Delaware Wildflowers Korean lespedeza is distributed throughout the midwest and eastern United States. For a current Alternate Names distribution map, please consult the Plant Profile Lespedeza stipulacea Maxim. page for this species on the PLANTS Website.
  • Non-Native Invasive Plants of the City of Alexandria, Virginia

    Non-Native Invasive Plants of the City of Alexandria, Virginia

    March 1, 2019 Non-Native Invasive Plants of the City of Alexandria, Virginia Non-native invasive plants have increasingly become a major threat to natural areas, parks, forests, and wetlands by displacing native species and wildlife and significantly degrading habitats. Today, they are considered the greatest threat to natural areas and global biodiversity, second only to habitat loss resulting from development and urbanization (Vitousek et al. 1996, Pimentel et al. 2005). The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation has identified 90 non-native invasive plants that threaten natural areas and lands in Virginia (Heffernan et al. 2014) and Swearingen et al. (2010) include 80 plants from a list of nearly 280 non-native invasive plant species documented within the mid- Atlantic region. Largely overlapping with these and other regional lists are 116 species that were documented in the City of Alexandria, Virginia during vegetation surveys and natural resource assessments by the City of Alexandria Dept. of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities (RPCA), Natural Lands Management Section. This list is not regulatory but serves as an educational reference informing those with concerns about non-native invasive plants in the City of Alexandria and vicinity, including taking action to prevent the further spread of these species by not planting them. Exotic species are those that are not native to a particular place or habitat as a result of human intervention. A non-native invasive plant is here defined as one that exhibits some degree of invasiveness, whether dominant and widespread in a particular habitat or landscape or much less common but long-lived and extremely persistent in places where it occurs.
  • Riverlands List

    Riverlands List

    Trip Report for: Riverlands Migratory Bird Center Species Count: 110 Date: WGNSS Lists St. Charles County Agency: US Army Corps of Engineers Location: Mississippi River Flyway Participants: Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Ammannia coccinea toothcup Lythraceae 6 -5 Ampelopsis cordata raccoon grape Vitaceae 3 -1 Andropogon gerardii var. undetermined big bluestem Poaceae/Andropogoneae 5 1 Anemone canadensis white anemone Ranunculaceae 6 -3 Apocynum cannabinum Indian hemp Apocynaceae 3 0 Asclepias incarnata ssp. incarnata swamp milkweed Asclepiadaceae 4 -5 Asclepias syriaca common milkweed Asclepiadaceae 0 5 Astragalus canadensis var. canadensis rattleweed Fabaceae/Faboideae 6 -1 Baptisia alba var. macrophylla (B. leucantha) white wild indigo Fabaceae/Faboideae 6 3 Bidens cernua sticktight Asteraceae/Heliantheae 5 -5 Boltonia decurrens decurrent false aster Asteraceae/Astereae 8 -5 Srank: S1 Grank: G2 Calystegia sepium (Convolvulus) hedge bindweed Convolvulaceae 1 0 Campsis radicans trumpet creeper Bignoniaceae 3 0 Chamaecrista fasciculata (Cassia) showy partridge-pea Fabaceae/Caesalpinioideae 2 4 * Cichorium intybus common chicory Asteraceae/Cichorieae 0 5 Cirsium discolor field thistle Asteraceae/Cardueae 3 5 * Convolvulus arvensis field bindweed Convolvulaceae 0 5 Conyza canadensis var. undetermined (Erigeron) horseweed Asteraceae/Astereae 0 1 Conyza ramosissima (Erigeron divaricatus) dwarf fleabane Asteraceae/Astereae 1 5 Cornus drummondii rough-leaved dogwood Cornaceae 2 0 Croton glandulosus var. septentrionalis sand croton Euphorbiaceae 2 5 Croton monanthogynus one-seeded croton Euphorbiaceae 2 5 Cynanchum laeve sand vine Asclepiadaceae 0 0 * Daucus carota ssp.
  • 2.4 FORAGE LEGUMES MILLETS and TIMOTHY.Pdf

    2.4 FORAGE LEGUMES MILLETS and TIMOTHY.Pdf

    2.4 FORAGE LEGUMES, MILLETS AND TIMOTHY** Alfalfa, clovers, sweet clover, crown vetch, kidney vetch, cicer milkvetch, birds-foot’s trefoil, black medick, timothy, millets (Grade Tables VIII to X) ** Note: MIXTURES Forage mixtures, lawn mixtures, and ground cover mixtures (Grade Tables XIII to XV), prerequisite accreditation for forage legumes, millets and timothy and grasses English Common Picture Grade Y/N Botanical Name Full Botanical Name & References Tables Name French Common Name Family y Anthyllis vulneraria Anthyllis vulneraria L. VIII Vetch, kidney Anthyllide vulnéaire Fabaceae y Astragalus cicer Astragalus cicer L. VIII Milk-vetch, cicer Astragale pois chiche Fabaceae Echinochloa frumentacea Link or E. esculenta (A. Brown) H. Scholz. (=E. crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv. var. frumentacae y Echinochloa frumentacea (Link) E. G. Camus & A. Camus) VIII Millet, Japanese Millet japonais Poaceae Kummerowia stipulacea (Maxim.) Makino (=Lespedeza y Kummerowia stipulacea stipulacea Maxim.) VIII Lespedeza. Korean Lespédeza, de Corée Fabaceae Kummerowia striata (Thunb.) Schindl. (=Lespedeza Lespedeza, common or y Kummerowia striata striata (Thunb.) Hook. & Arn.) VIII Kobe Lespédeza, commun ou kobe Fabaceae Lespedeza, sericea or Lespédeza, sericea ou de y Lespedeza cuneata Lespedeza cuneata (Dum.-Cours.) G. Don VIII Chinese Chine Fabaceae y Lotus corniculatus Lotus corniculatus L. X Trefoil, bird's foot Lotier corniculé Fabaceae y Medicago lupulina Medicago lupulina L. IX Medick, black Lupuline Fabaceae y Medicago sativa Medicago sativa L. VIII Alfalfa Luzerne Fabaceae Clover sweet - white Mélilot ou trèfle d'odeur - y Melilotus albus Melilotus albus Medik. VIII blossom fleurs blanches Fabaceae Clover sweet - yellow Mélilot ou trèfle d'odeur - y Melilotus officinalis Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.
  • Kummerowia Stipulacea, and K

    Kummerowia Stipulacea, and K

    August 3, 2005 version Official Assessment of Lespedezas (including L. cuneata, L. bicolor, L. thunbergii, Kummerowia stipulacea, and K. striata) in Indiana’s Natural Areas Assessed July 6, 2004- by Ellen Jacquart, Gary Langell, Phil O’Connor, Lee Casebere, and Ed Guljas Answers are underlined, comments and discussion are in italics. Contents of the Assessment: Section I – Invasion Status. Determines whether the species being evaluated is invasive in Indiana. Section II – Ecological Impacts of Invasion. Evaluates the significance of impacts of the species. Section III – Potential for Expansion. Evaluates the actual and/or potential expansion of the species. Section IV – Difficulty of Management. Evaluates how hard it is to control the invasive species. Section V – Commercial Value. Evaluates how valuable the species is economically in Indiana. Questions in Sections I – V may direct you to one or more of the following sections for particular invasive species: Section A. For species which have impacts limited to a few sites, assesses the potential for further spread. Section B. For species which have medium impacts but high value, assesses whether species could be used in specific circumstances that would prevent escape and invasion. A worksheet for use with the assessment is found on page 10. The meeting started with a summary of the Asian lespdezas to be assessed. They fall into three groups: Sericea lespedeza: L. cuneata is a perennial lespedeza with woody stems, well known and planted for many years for wildlife purposes and for erosion control on poor soils. Most Indiana agencies have already stopped planting it or recommending it because of its aggressiveness.
  • CFIA ID Features of Fabaceae 2018

    CFIA ID Features of Fabaceae 2018

    Identification Features of Fabaceae & Application to Selected Species April 30th , 2018 Jennifer Neudorf, SSTS, CFIA © 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. Learning objectives for this course 1. Become familiar with the structures and features of the Fabaceae family that analysts use to gather information about their identity. 2. Know how to apply botany knowledge to distinguish selected species. 2 Introduction to Fabaceae Photo by: Sdecosta; https://shovelingwithsamantha.wordpress.com/2015/01/13/raising-alfalfa-seed-part-1-the- difference/ Photo from: J&L Candles Photo from: Barry Tilman, University of Florida Photo from: Pa Farm & Dairy https://www.farmanddairy.com/news/perdue-soybean-plant- doubles-pa-s-processing-capacity/446259.html 3 The Three Subfamiles of Fabaceae: Mimosoideae Photo from: Wikimedia commons Pleurogram Photo from: GRIN database (Steve Hurst) 4 The Three Subfamiles of Fabaceae: Caesalpinoideae Pleurogram Photo from: GRIN database (Steve Hurst) Photo from: Wikimedia commons 5 The Three Subfamiles of Fabaceae: Faboideae Photo from: Wikimedia commons 6 Fabaceae Legume and Seeds Photo from: Centre for Integrative Legume Research, University of Queensland Stem and flower Fruit / Seed Funiculus Style remnant Ovary Wall Remnant 7 Fabaceae Seed Anatomy Common vetch (Vicia sativa) Plumule Radicle Hilum Cotyledon Hilum Radicle Cotyledon 8 Fabaceae Seed Anatomy Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Alsike clover (Trifolium hybridum) Hilum
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment

    Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment

    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.