<<

2.5 ANCC Contact Hours The Epidemiology of -Resistant in Orthopaedics

Mary Atkinson Smith

In the specialty of orthopaedics, methicillin-resistant Staphy- joint of a knee (Ogston, 1984). In 1884, a German physi- lococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major contributor to infections cian and microbiologist named Friedrich Julius of the soft tissues, surgical sites, and joints, in addition to Rosenbach appended Staphylococcus to S. aureus increasing disability, mortality, and healthcare costs. Inap- (Todar, 2008). S. aureus is an anaerobic gram-positive propriate prescribing and misuse of have led to coccal bacterium that colonizes in the nasal passages bacterial resistance and the rapid emergence of MRSA. It is and is routinely found on the skin as normal fl ora, in the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract ( Todar, 2008). It is imperative for healthcare providers and facilities to improve estimated that up to 20% of individuals are long-term quality, promote safety, and decrease costs related to MRSA carriers of S. aureus, which is the most common class infections. The healthcare profession and society as a whole of Staphylococcus that leads to Staphylococcus infec- play an important role in minimizing the transmission of tions (Kluytmans, van Belkum, & Verbrugh, 1997). S. pathogens, reducing the incidence of MRSA infections, and aureus can cause a wide range of illnesses from minor decreasing the development of future resistant skin infections to life-threatening conditions such as pathogens. This article discusses the epidemiology of MRSA and sepsis. It is also a common cause of and describes evidence-based guidelines pertaining to the hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and surgical site in- prevention, minimization, and treatment of MRSA-related fections (SSIs). infections. Specifi c application to orthopaedics are discussed is the antibiotic of choice to treat infec- in the context of patient risk factors, perioperative and post- tions caused by S. aureus . When penicillin was fi rst in- troduced in 1943, antibiotic resistance to S. aureus was operative prophylaxis, and current trends regarding educa- uncommon. Forty percent of HAIs were S. aureus re- tion and reporting strategies. sistant by 1950 with 80% being resistant by 1960 ( Chambers, 2001). Penicillin resistance has become ex- taphylococcus aureus are commonly tremely common, which has led to the use of penicilli- found on the skin and in the nares of healthy nase-resistant β -lactam antibiotics as fi rst-line therapy individuals and is also one of the most common to treat infections caused by S. aureus. The increased associated with infections use of β -lactam antibiotics has now led to the emer- S of the skin and soft tissue. The misuse of antibiotics has gence of MRSA. The increased incidence of MRSA can led to bacterial resistance, and the rapid emergence of be contributed to the overuse and inappropriate pre- methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The emergence scribing of β -lactam class of antibiotics, which includes of MRSA has created signifi cant healthcare challenges penicillin derivative antibiotics and . in community and hospital settings. In the specialty of Methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteria are commonly orthopaedics, MRSA is a major contributor to surgical resistant to multiple antibiotics. This antibiotic resist- site infections, disability, increasing mortality, and ris- ance makes MRSA infections more challenging to treat ing healthcare costs. To improve the quality of care and with standard antibiotics and potentially more life decrease healthcare spending, it is important for health- threatening. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus has become care providers to be aware of the potential for the devel- problematic for hospitals and facilities that have com- opment of MRSA infections, in addition to evidence- munity-type living environments, patients with open based practices related to the prevention, minimization, and treatment of MRSA infections. The purpose of this article was to describe the development, presentation, Mary Atkinson Smith, DNP, NP-C, ONP-C , Board Certifi ed Nurse prevention, and treatment of MRSA. Practitioner and RNFA, Starkville Orthopedic Clinic, Starkville, Mississippi; Board Certifi ed Nurse Practitioner, UMMC Center for TeleHealth, Jackson, Mississippi; and Assistant Professor & Assistant Program Director for Online Programs, South University College of Nursing and Background and Description Public Health. Staphylococcus was discovered in 1880 in the United The author and planners have disclosed no potential confl icts of interest, Kingdom by surgeon Sir Alexander Ogston from puru- fi nancial or otherwise. lence that resulted from a surgical abscess within the DOI: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000141

128 Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 128128 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM wounds or implanted devices, and immunocompro- or long-term care facility. In a healthcare setting, mised individuals. HA-MRSA is frequently attributed to devices that are used in procedures and can lead to pneumonia, surgi- cal site infections, sepsis, or even death. Common types Pathogenesis and Description of HAIs include central line-associated bloodstream Bacteria are continually present on the skin surface and infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, are considered part of the normal skin fl ora. Twenty per- surgical site infections, and ventilator-associated pneu- cent of the population is considered to be colonized monia ( CDC, 2014b ). According to a large sample of with S. aureus and 1% of the population is considered acute care hospitals in the United States, 722,000 HAIs to be colonized with MRSA.3,6 The nose and skin are were reported in 2011, of which 75,000 patients died common areas for MRSA colonization. Colonization during the hospitalization, and more than half of the means that bacteria are present but it does not cause an HAIs were located outside the intensive care unit (CDC, infection unless it is able to penetrate the skin’s surface. 2014c ). An example of an orthopaedic-related An infection can develop when the skin’s surface is dis- HA-MRSA infection would be a postoperative surgical rupted and the bacteria have an easy mode of entry in site infection. the body. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MRSA in Orthopaedics (CDC) has listed MRSA as one of the 18 multidrug- resistant microbes, also known as a “superbug” ( CDC, Antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as MRSA can be 2014a ). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections are very challenging for healthcare providers and devastat- categorized as either community acquired (CA-MRSA) ing on a patient’s musculoskeletal system. The most or healthcare acquired (HA-MRSA) with CA-MRSA common diagnoses associated with MRSA infections in being more common. A large percentage of CA-MRSA the specialty of orthopaedics include cellulitis, abscess, begins as a localized skin infection that is due to a break postoperative surgical site infection, infections result- in the skin’s surface among healthy individuals, who ing from a surgically implanted device, or osteomyelitis. have not been hospitalized or have not had a recent The most frequently conducted surgical procedures due medical procedure. The majority of HA-MRSA infec- to MRSA infections are incision and drainage of skin tions can occur as the result of a break in the skins sur- and subcutaneous infection, debridement, and bone face, because of factors such as a surgical incision or the excision. insertion of medical devices. Although CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA are defi ned differently, their mode of trans- mission is still the same: direct contact with colonized Disease Progression and skin or the surface of a shared item where MRSA is Transmission present. There are many factors that contribute to the progres- sion and transmission of MRSA within community and CA-MRSA healthcare-related settings with contaminated hands, According to the CDC (2005), there are several factors poor hygiene, and unsanitary environments being the that determine the classifi cation of CA-MRSA. A person most common. Other contributory factors include anti- must be diagnosed in an outpatient setting or have a biotic resistance and various host factors. These con- positive culture within 48 hours of a hospital admission. tributory factors address many aspects such appropri- The individual must not have a permanently implanted ate prescribing of antibiotics among providers, misuse medical device or an indwelling catheter, in addition to of antibiotics by patients, evidence-based hand hygiene a negative medical history for MRSA. Also, to be consid- practices among clinicians, and sanitary hygiene ac- ered CA-MRSA, there must not be a recent hospitaliza- tions among the general public, in addition to environ- tion or stay in a long-term care facility. mental and host-related infl uences. Other points that It is not uncommon for individuals to be colonized may be applicable to MRSA progression and transmis- with CA-MRSA and remain symptomatic. Approximately sion are also discussed in prevention and prophylaxis 80% of CA-MRSA cases present as uncomplicated skin section of this article. Table 1 provides an overview of and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in the form of celluli- infl uencing factors related to MRSA progression and tis, folliculitis, , or an abscess. A CA-MRSA transmission. SSTI may require incision and drainage for effective treatment and management, in addition to antibiotic H AND H YGIENE therapy. Rare, but serious complications of CA-MRSA Methicillin-resistant S. aureus is spread by touching the SSTIs, include bone and joint infections, necrotizing skin of a contaminated individual or touching a con- fasciitis, or endocarditis (Raygada & Levine, 2009). An taminated surface; therefore, proper hand hygiene plays example of CA-MRSA that can lead to an orthopaedic- a major role in the prevention and transmission of related infection is olecranon or patellar bursitis. MRSA. It is particularly important to wash hands in be- tween encounters with individuals who are suspected to HA-MRSA have a skin infection, before eating and after using the Healthcare-acquired MRSA infections also fall under bathroom. Hands may also be cleansed with a 60% the broad category of HAIs that are infections that are -based sanitizer (Harris, 2014 ). In healthcare set- acquired from a healthcare facility such as a hospital tings, standard precautions include hand washing and

© 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 129 Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 129129 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM T ABLE 1. I NFLUENCING FACTORS OF MRSA PROGRESSION E NVIRONMENTAL S ANITATION M EASURES AND TRANSMISSION Environments that lack proper sanitation cleaning tech- Hand hygiene niques have an increased incidence of spreading MRSA. Examples of environments that are more likely to expe- Antibiotic resistance rience the spread of MRSA due to ineffective sanitation Inappropriate prescribing are schools, gymnasiums, nursing homes, or hospitals. Misuse of antibiotics These places should disinfect surfaces with antimicro- bial cleaning agent to help reduce and eliminate the Environmental sanitation measures presence of MRSA. Other measures that thwart the Host risk factors spread of MRSA include regular washing of personal Note . MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. linens in hot water and laundry detergent, showering with antibacterial soap after each athletic event, and avoidance of sharing personal hygiene items such as razors, brushes, combs, or makeup ( CDC, 2014a ). the use of personal protective equipment such as gloves Healthcare facilities are required by law to follow cer- to address the transmission of pathogens such MRSA. tain guidelines regarding environmental infection con- trol measures pertaining to disinfection and steriliza- ANTIBIOTIC R ESISTANCE tion ( CDC, 2014a). Antibiotic resistance contributes to a signifi cant burden on the healthcare system from economic, quality, and H OST R ISK F ACTORS safety standpoints. Research has proven that antibiotics Individuals can possess certain host risk factors that are prescribed unnecessarily and misused by patients contribute to an increased incidence for developing an 50% of the time ( CDC, 2014a ). The main factors that MRSA infection. These include a participation in ath- contribute to antibiotic resistance are inappropriate letic sports, weakened immune system, presence of an prescribing of antibiotics by healthcare providers and open wound, being elderly, and being extremely young. misuse of antibiotics by patients. In the United States, Other host risk factors include being a chronic MRSA up to as many as two million people develop life- carrier or having other comorbid conditions such as di- threatening infections each year caused by bacteria that abetes and obesity. If these risk factors are present and have resistant properties related to one or more antibi- are coupled with a hospitalization, surgical procedure, otics formulated to treat infections and up to 23,000 or nursing home stay or other communal living environ- deaths are directly related to antibiotic resistant infec- ments, the risk is even greater for developing an MRSA tions ( CDC, 2014a). It has been estimated that antibiotic infection ( Klevens et al., 2006). resistance is responsible for as many as 20 billion dol- lars in healthcare-related costs yearly, with costs related to lost productivity being close to 35 billion dollars each Clinical Symptoms and Diagnostics year (Roberts, Hota, & Ahmad, 2009). The clinical symptoms that are consistent with an MRSA infection include redness, swelling, and tender- Inappropriate Prescribing ness of an area that resembles a pimple, a rash that is This is described as the prescribing of antibiotics for painful and pus-fi lled, or a lesion with drainage that re- viral or self-limiting bacterial infections that lead to sembles a spider bite. An individual may also have fever, acute infections of the respiratory tract (Colgan & chills, or shortness of breath. In the practice of ortho- Powers, 2001). Several factors contribute to the practice paedics, symptoms may include a warm, red, swollen, of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among health- or painful joint. The presence of MRSA can be con- care providers. These contributing factors include lack fi rmed by obtaining a culture of the suspected area. In of awareness or utilization of evidence-based guidelines orthopaedics, a culture may be obtained by doing a skin that address appropriate antibiotic prescribing, pres- swab, by joint aspiration, or during a surgical proce- sure or infl uence from patients to prescribe an antibi- dure. Results of bacterial cultures are usually available otic, and perceived lack of time for patient education within 48–72 hours. The results provide a culture and regarding appropriate antibiotic prescribing (Froh, sensitivity report, which includes identifi cation of the 2013 ). According to Havers et al. (2014) , continuing ed- actual bacteria present and a list of antibiotics that the ucation efforts to further educate clinicians on appro- bacteria are resistant and sensitive to. Other diagnostic priate antibiotic prescribing are necessary when it studies such as blood culture tests and radiological im- comes to improve the quality of healthcare. aging studies may be obtained if infections of the bone, joint, or lung are suspected. Misuse of Antibiotics The misuse of antibiotics among the public also plays a role in the development of antibiotic resistance and the Treatment and Management increasing incidence of MRSA. Common examples of Treatment of MRSA infections is done with antibiotics behaviors that contribute to the misuse of antibiotics that are known not to have resistance against MRSA include not completing the full course of antibiotics are bacteria. According to evidence-based guidelines, the prescribed, taking leftover antibiotic prescriptions, and most commonly recommended oral antibiotics to treat cultural beliefs pertaining to antibiotic use. MRSA infections are -,

130 Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 130130 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM , , or , with com- monitor and track MRSA rates, compliance programs mon intravenous antibiotics being , line- pertaining to recommended hand hygiene practices, zolid, or . MRSA is frequently treated with and MRSA education geared toward healthcare work- two or more antibiotics simultaneously (Harris, 2014). ers, patients, and family members. Many hospitals also Treatment is also guided by the culture and sensitivity use preoperative MRSA screening modalities that in- report, in addition to the results of other diagnostic clude a specifi c treatment protocol if the patient tests tests. Depending upon the seriousness of the MRSA in- positive for MRSA colonization. Table 2 provides an fection, these antibiotics may be given by mouth or in- overview of strategies related to prevention and prophy- travenously, and treatment may take place at home on laxis of MRSA. an outpatient basis or in the hospital on an inpatient basis. Within healthcare facilities, strict guidelines re- E VIDENCE -B ASED P RACTICE S TRATEGIES garding isolation precautions are followed to control Evidence-based practice strategies play an instrumental and prevent the spread of MRSA from infected patients role in minimizing the spread of MRSA by the develop- to uninfected patients ( CDC, 2014a). ment and implementation of strategies that focus on Treatment of MRSA infections in the specialty of or- prevention and prophylaxis. Evidence-based practice thopaedics may range from antibiotic therapy to specifi c involves reviewing current literature for actions and ap- modalities such as wound management techniques or plications that have shown to improve the quality of surgical procedures. Infections of a joint replacement care and patient outcomes and implementing the prosthesis can have devastating outcomes for patients, proven actions and applications into clinical practice. providers, and hospitals, in addition to signifi cant eco- Examples of evidence-based practice modalities to pre- nomic burdens. A joint replacement prosthesis infection vent the spread of MRSA include the implementation of requires at least 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic ther- clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the utilization of apy and, in some cases, multiple surgical procedures universal precautions, administration of intravenous may be required to clear the MRSA infection and address antibiotics prior to surgical procedures, and the devel- the damage caused by the bacteria (Osman et al., 2013). opment of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). The utilization of available toolkits that address infection Prevention and Prophylaxis prevention may serve to encourage best practices that will minimize the development of MRSA ( CDC, 2011 ; The fi rst line of defense regarding the prevention and Kentucky MRSA Collaborative, 2014). The Institute for prophylaxis of MRSA-related infections is the consistent Healthcare Improvement 5 Million Lives Campaign’s practice of evidence-based hand hygiene such as rub- How-to Guide on reducing MRSA contains evidence- bing the hands together with warm soap and water for based interventions for healthcare facilities to reduce at least 10 to 15 seconds, drying hands with a single-use MRSA infections, provides descriptions regarding inter- paper towel, and using another towel to turn off the sink vention implementation, and recommends measures faucet (Harris, 2014; Mayo Clinic, 2010). Evidence- that can be used to measure improvement (Institute for based hand hygiene also includes the use of alcohol- Healthcare Improvement, 2014). based hand sanitizers to disinfect the hands with the utilization of soap and water is not an option (Harris, 2014 ). Prevention and prophylaxis also include health- care providers following evidence-based guidelines per- TABLE 2. S TRATEGIES RELATED TO THE P REVENTION AND taining to appropriate antibiotic prescribing, healthcare PROPHYLAXIS OF MRSA workers adhering to universal precautions and isolation Evidence-based strategies precautions, patient education to curb the misuse of an- Surgical care improvement project tibiotics, and the utilization of recommended environ- mental sanitation practices to promote disinfecting Clinical practice guidelines ( CDC, 2014a). A comprehensive MRSA-specifi c program Universal precautions that includes evidence-based practice guidelines, risk Toolkits assessment, monitoring and tracking, and preventive Antibiotic stewardship programs education strategies might prove benefi cial in minimiz- ing the development and spread of MRSA (CDC, 2014a ). Risk assessments Recent guidelines created collaboratively among the Measuring quality of clinical practices Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Tracking of MRSA data Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Hospital Association, Association for Professionals in Reporting of confi rmed MRSA cases Infection Control, and Epidemiology and The Joint Preventive education strategies Commission (TJC) aim to combat MRSA in hospital set- Facility education tings. These guidelines were recently published in Patient education Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology and aim to reduce the prevalence of MRSA and prioritize the Family and caregiver education current MRSA prevention strategies within hospitals Community education ( Calfee et al., 2014). The new guidelines include strate- = gies such as MRSA risk assessments, programs that Note . MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

© 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 131 Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 131131 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM Surgical Care Improvement Project reducing the rate of antibiotic resistance and creating a significant cost-savings for hospitals (Griffith, A specifi c example of an evidence-based strategy to pre- Postelnick, & Scheetz, 2012). Beginning in 2014, the vent the spread of MRSA is the Surgical Care CDC started recommending that all acute care hospitals Improvement Project (SCIP). The SCIP is a national execute ASPs (Fridkin, Baggs, & Fagan, 2014). partnership of organizations that aim to improve surgi- cal services and minimize surgical complications by re- ducing the incidence of postoperative surgical site in- R ISK A SSESSMENT S TRATEGIES fections ( Brendle, 2007 ). The SCIP consists of core Screening tools for conducting MRSA risk assessments prevention measures that focus on reducing postopera- may prove to be benefi cial preoperatively to decrease tive surgical site infections through antibiotic prophy- MRSA-related surgical site infections. A total joint ar- laxis, in addition to other performance measure recom- throplasty preoperative screening and treatment pro- mendations such as postoperative glucose levels, gram for S. aureus at one hospital decreased the rate of preoperative surgical site hair removal, and maintain- surgical site infections by 82% ( McKee, 2011). Another ing normothermia postoperatively (Green, Mills, Moss, risk assessment strategy is preoperative MRSA nares Sposato, & Vignari, 2010). screening with treatment prior to orthopaedic surgical procedures such as total knee arthroplasty. A study by Clinical Practice Guidelines Moroski, Woolwine, and Schwarzkopf (2014) revealed preoperative decolonization with nasal to be According to the Institute of Medicine (2011), CPGs are effective in the reduction of MRSA colonization. developed by performing a systematic review of the highest levels of current evidence, in addition to assess- EASURING RACKING AND EPORTING TRATEGIES ing the potential risks and benefi ts of other alternative M , T , R S modalities. Utilization of surgical site infection preven- Measurement, tracking, and reporting strategies that tion CPGs serves to educate and guide healthcare facil- focus on infection-related topics such as incidence, ity staff in the promotion and implementation of infec- prevention, evidence-based practices, and quality im- tion-prevention measures. Evidence shows that the provement are meant to promote safety of the delivery utilization of evidence-based CPGs that focus on surgi- of healthcare services by minimizing the development cal site infection prevention may serve to decrease the of HAIs. Measurement can be used in many ways to incidence and extent of injury caused by surgical site determine if outcome data are acceptable or if the infections ( Hall, 2007 ). The National Association of clinical quality indicators (CQIs) being used are con- Orthopaedic Nurses released its surgical site infection sidered best practice. Measuring performance is also prevention CPG in 2013 with the purpose of promoting an action required for benchmarking, which may staff education regarding prevention of orthopaedic serve to support change that leads to improvement surgery-related infections (Smith & Dahlen, 2013). and change. Tracking and public reporting of infec- tion-related data serve to promote the elimination of Universal Precautions HAIs (CDC, 2011). According to the Occupational Safety and Health Clinical Quality Indicators Administration (2014), the use of universal precautions approach is based on the principle that all human blood The utilization of CQIs allows for the identifi cation of and body fl uids are infectious and have the ability to practices that are in need of improvement (Agency for transmit infections. Universal precautions consist of Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003). Clinical quality standard precautions and transmission-based precau- indicators can also serve as evidence-based practice tions. Standard precautions include hand washing and guides that can assist with the measurement of the qual- the use of personal protective equipment such as gowns, ity and safety of patient care (Smith, Jacobs, Rodier, masks, and gloves. Transmission-based precautions are Taylor, & Taylor-White, 2011). The CQIs that are appli- additional measures beyond the standard precautions cable to infection prophylaxis best practices in ortho- that address airborne, droplet, and contact mode of paedics include intravenous antibiotic administration, pathogen transmission. The development of policies adherence to perioperative skin preparation, systematic that focus on the core principles of universal precau- assessment of postsurgical incision, proper technique tions are critical when it comes to preventing the spread with postsurgical dressing changes, and compliance of MRSA within healthcare facilities. with facility-specifi c perioperative and postoperative protocols (Smith et al., 2011).

Antibiotic Stewardship Programs Data Tracking Hospital-based programs that improve antibiotic utili- The tracking of MRSA in healthcare settings serves to zation by optimally treating infections and reducing identify problematic areas, measure the progression of antibiotic-related adverse events are referred to as ASPs preventive strategies, and eradicate healthcare- (Malani et al., 2013). A hospital ASP assists clinicians in associated MRSA (CDC, 2014d). Data tracking also improving quality of care and patient safety by increas- provides healthcare facilities with the ability to follow ing the incidence of appropriate antibiotic prescribing errors related to blood safety, in addition to relevant for therapeutic and prophylaxis purposes ( Kaki et al., healthcare process measures such as the rates of ad- 2011). Additional benefi ts of a hospital ASP include herence to infection control (CDC, 2014d ). An example

132 Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 132132 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM of an HAI tracking system is the National Healthcare such as daptomycin (Cubicin), (Zyvox), and Safety Network, which is the largest HAI tracking sys- ceftaroline (Tefl aro). According to Rossi et al. (2014) , tem in the nation ( CDC, 2014d ). The CDC also provides the fi rst case of a new superbug that is considered a part MRSA-specifi c tracking that includes national esti- of the MRSA classifi cation and is also resistant to van- mates and adjusted incidence rates of MRSA infec- comycin has been identifi ed in Brazil. These factors re- tions (CDC, 2014e ). veal the potential for MRSA to develop into a serious public health epidemic. Public Reporting The use of an interdisciplinary team approach when developing and implementing MRSA-prevention strate- Consumer demand for the availability of healthcare per- gies is gaining popularity in healthcare facilities. An inter- formance data continues to grow. Many states have disciplinary team approach encourages a more dynamic, passed legislation that mandates facilities to publicly comprehensive, and collaborative that is advantageous report HAI data. According to the Healthcare Infection for patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare fa- Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), the cilities (Grant & Finocchio, 1995). Evidence-based team- goals of public reporting of HAI data include quality im- work systems that involve all disciplines serve to maxi- provement of healthcare delivery through preventing mize the use of best practices, people, and resources to infections and providing reliable HAI data to consum- attain the most desirable outcomes for patients (Agency ers, which will support informed choices of healthcare for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014). ( HICPAC, 2009). Another current trend to combat the development of Many guidelines and toolkits exist to assist health- MRSA-related infections involves multifaceted strate- care facilities with accurate and appropriate reporting gies to minimize stress and burnout among healthcare of HAI data. professionals. Wellness programs and appropriate staff- ing ratios are two examples of strategies aimed at pre- PREVENTIVE E DUCATION S TRATEGIES venting stress and burnout among providers. Cimiotti, Preventive educational strategies that focus on MRSA Aiken, Sloane, & Wu (2012) investigated job-related prevention should involve healthcare staff, patients, burnout among registered nurses and if it infl uences the family members, caregivers, and the public in general. development of inpatient, HAIs among patients. This The healthcare workforce should realize that they play a study revealed that there was a signifi cant association vital role in MRSA prevention when it comes to HAIs. between burnout among registered nurses and the de- Healthcare facilities may fi nd the implementation of velopment of urinary tract infections and surgical site facility-wide educational hand hygiene programs to be infections among patients. benefi cial and supportive when it comes to encouraging The CDC (2015) recently released the annual National a cultural change within the facility. Educational infor- and State Healthcare-associated Infection (HAI) mation should be posted throughout the facility for all Progress Report, which contains a summary of data that individuals to view, in addition to posting educational is submitted to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety information in each patient room. These preventive ed- Network. The recent report revealed signifi cant declines ucation strategies may serve to minimize the develop- nationally of certain HAIs during 2013 with the greatest ment of HA-MRSA. reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infec- Preventive educational strategies can involve educat- tions and SSIs (CDC, 2015). The HAI Progress Report ing the community about MRSA prevention by providing data help measure and track HAI-prevention progress educational sessions to schools, day care programs, so- nationally. However, the national 2013 goals set by the cial groups, and civic clubs. Community-based education National Action Plan to Prevention Health Care– should focus on the basics of MRSA prevention such as Associated Infections: Road Map to Elimination (HAI hand-washing, appropriate personal and environmental Action Plan) established by the U.S. Department of hygiene, and keeping suspected MRSA wounds covered. Health and Human Services were not met (CDC, 2015 ). These community-based preventive educational strate- This proves that a multifaceted approach involving gies may serve to minimize the spread of CA-MRSA. healthcare facilities, healthcare providers, and the pub- lic in general is needed to further decrease the incidence of HAI infections that compromise patient safety and Current Trends increase morbidity and mortality rates. Vancomycin has always been the standard of care when Beginning in January 2015, TJC introduced the treating MRSA, in addition to being the least expensive Infection Prevention and Healthcare-Associated antibiotic available to treat MRSA. A recent survey ad- Infection Portal ( TJC, 2015 ). This portal combines the ministered to infectious disease specialists revealed that TJC’s online infection-prevention resources into one eas- there is an elevated concern of increasing minimum in- ily accessible format. Prior to the development of this hibitory concentrations with vancomycin use for MRSA portal, information pertaining to infection control and isolated in hospitals (Decision Resources Group, 2014). HAIs was available separately. The newly developed por- This survey also revealed that over the last 2 years, al- tal also includes links related to various infection- most two-thirds of the infectious disease specialists re- prevention resources such as infection-prevention CPGs ported prescribing higher doses of vancomycin to and evidence-based sterilization procedures. The overall achieve increasing trough levels, in addition to elevated goal for developing this portal is to provide easy access minimum inhibitory concentrations being the most for healthcare providers to obtain up-to-date resources common reason for prescribing branded medications, pertaining to infection prevention and HAIs (TJC, 2015 ).

© 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 133 Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 133133 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM Conclusion Chambers , F. ( 2001 ). The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus . Emerging Infectious Diseases , Antibiotic resistance has become an epidemic nationally 7 ( 2 ), 178 – 182 . and internationally and has led to the development of Cimiotti , J. , Aiken , L. , Sloane , D. , & Wu , E. (2012 ). Nurse potentially deadly antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as staffi ng, burnout, and health care-associated infection. MRSA. To prevent further spread of MRSA, healthcare American Journal of Infection Control , 40 ( 6 ), 486 – 409 . providers must be knowledgeable of evidence-based Colgan , R. , & Powers , H. ( 2001 ). Appropriate antibiotic-prescribing guidelines, teach patients how to prescribing: Approaches that limit antimicrobial resist- use antibiotics appropriately, and practice recommended ance . American Family Physician , 64 ( 6 ), 999 – 1005 . Decision Resources Group . ( 2014 ). Growing concern over hand hygiene. Healthcare facilities must implement pol- the effi cacy of vancomycin is prompting greater use of icies that include protocols consisting of evidence-based branded therapies for the treatment of MRSA infections . infection-prevention CPGs and environmental sanita- Retrieved from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-re- tion practices. The general public plays a role in prevent- leases/growing-concern-over-the-effi cacy-of-vancomy- ing antibiotic resistance as well by avoiding antibiotic cin-is-prompting-greater-use-of-branded-therapies- misuse, practicing recommended hand and personal hy- for-the-treatment-of-mrsa-infections-266046951.html giene, and appropriate sanitation of the personal envi- Fridkin , S. , Baggs , J. , & Fagan , R. ( 2014). Vital signs: ronment. The responsibility to prevent the spread of Improving antibiotic use among hospitalized patients. MRSA lies in both healthcare and society as a whole. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report , 63 . Froh , M. ( 2013). Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in pri- R EFERENCES mary care: Barriers, misconceptions, and evidence based Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . (2003 ). recommendations for improvement . Masters in Nursing Evidence report/technology assessment: Total knee re- Thesis, Washington State University College of placement (AHRQ Publication No. 04-E006-2). Nursing . Retrieved from http://research.wsulibs.wsu Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/ .edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2376/4347/M_ evidence/pdf/knee/knee.pdf Froh_010899854.pdf?sequence= 1 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . (2014 ). Grant , R. , & Finocchio , L. ( 1995 ). California Primary Care TeamSTEPPS: National implementation . Retrieved Consortium Subcommittee on Interdisciplinary from http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov/ Collaboration. Interdisciplinary collaborative teams in Brendle , T. ( 2007 ). Surgical Care Improvement Project and primary care: A model curriculum and resource guide . the perioperative nurses’ role . AORN Journal , 86 (1 ), San Francisco, CA: Pew Health Professions 94 – 101. Commission. Calfee , D. , Salgado , C. , Milstone , A. , Harris , A. , Kuhar , D. , Green , L. , Mills , R. , Moss , R. , Sposato , K. , & Vignari , M. Moody , J. , … Yokoe , D. (2014 ). Strategies to prevent ( 2010). Guide to the elimination of orthopedic surgical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus trans- site infections . APIC . Retrieved from http://www.apic mission and infection in acute care hospitals: 2014 .org/Resource_/EliminationGuideForm/34e03612-d1e6– Update . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology , 4214-a76b-e532c6fc3898/File/APIC-Ortho-Guide.pdf 35 ( 7 ), 772 – 796 . Griffi th , M. , Postelnick , M. , & Scheetz , M. ( 2012 ). Anti- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2005 ). microbial stewardship programs: Methods of opera- Community-associated MRSA information for clini- tion and suggested outcomes . Expert Review of Anti- cians . Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/ infective Therapy , 10 ( 1 ), 63 – 73 . dhqp/ar_mrsa_ca_clinicians.html Hall , M. (2007 ). Surgical care improvement project (SCIP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2011 ). module 1: Infection prevention update . Retrieved from Eliminating healthcare-associated infections. www.medscape.com/viewprogram/7214 Association of State and Territorial Health Offi cials . Harris , A. (2014 ). Patient information: Methicillin-resistant Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/toolkits/ Staphylococcus aureus —beyond the basics. UpToDate . toolkit-hai-policy-fi nal_01-2012.pdf Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014a ). methicillin-resistant-staphylococcus-aureus-mrsa-be- Antibiotic/: Threat report 2013 . yond-the-basics Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/ Havers , F. , Thaker , S. , Clippard , J. , Jackson , M. , McLean , threat-report-2013/ H. , Gaglani , M. , … Fry , A. (2014 ). Use of infl uenza an- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014b ). Type tiviral agents by ambulatory care clinicians during the of healthcare-associated infections . Retrieved from 2012–2013 influenza season . Clinical Infectious http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/infectionTypes.html Diseases . Retrieved from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . ( 2014c ). content/early/2014/07/09/cid.ciu422.abstract Data and statistics: HAI prevalence survey . Retrieved Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory from http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/surveillance/index. Committee . (2009 ). Guidance on public reporting of html healthcare-associated infections: Recommendations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014d ). of the healthcare infection control practices advisory National healthcare safety network (NHSN) . Retrieved committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . from http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/ Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pubReport Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2014e ). MRSA Guide/publicReportingHAI.html tracking . Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/ Institute for Healthcare Improvement . ( 2014 ). How-to guide: tracking/index.html Reduce MRSA infection . Retrieved from http://www.ihi Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2015 ). .org/resources/Pages/Tools/HowtoGuideReduceMRSA Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) progress report . Infection.aspx Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hai/progress-re- Institute of Medicine . ( 2011 ). Clinical practice guidelines we port/index.html can trust . Retrieved from http://www.iom

134 Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 134134 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM .edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We- Retrieved from https:// www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/ Can-Trust.aspx hospital/hazards/univprec/univ.html Kaki , R. , Elligsen , M. , Walker , S. , Simor , A. , Palmay , L. , & Ogston , A. ( 1984 ). On abscesses: Classics in infectious dis- Daneman , N. (2011 ). Impact of antimicrobial steward- eases. Reviews of Infectious Diseases , 6 ( 1 ), 122 – 128 . ship in critical care: a systematic review. The Journal of Osman , D. , Berbari , E. , Berendt , A. , Lew , D. , Zimmerli , W. , Antimicrobial , 66 ( 6 ): 1223 – 1230 . Steckelberg , J. , … Wilson , W. ( 2013). Diagnosis and Kentucky MRSA Collaborative . (2014 ). Improving identifi - management of prosthetic joint infection: Clinical cation, treatment, & containment of methicillin- practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society resistant Staphylococcus aureus: KHA MRSA of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases . Retrieved Hospital Toolkit . Retrieved from http://info.kyha.com/ from http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/bugdrug/antibiotic_ mrsa/Toolkit.htm manual/idsaprostheticjoint2013.pdf Klevens , M. , Morrison , M. , Fridkin , S. , Reingold , A. , Petit , Raygada , J. , & Levine , D. ( 2009 ). Managing CA-MRSA infec- S. , Gershman , K. , … Tenover , F. (2006 ). Community- tions: Current and emerging options . Retrieved from associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus au- http://www.rheumatologynetwork.com/articles/managing- reus and healthcare risk factors. Emerging Infectious ca-mrsa-infections-current-and-emerging-options Diseases , 12 ( 12 ), 1991 – 1993 . Roberts , R. , Hota , B. , & Ahmad , I. ( 2009 ). Hospital and societal Kluytmans , J. , van Belkum , A. , & Verbrugh , H. ( 1997 ). costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus : teaching hospital: Implications for antibiotic steward- Epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated ship . Clinical Infectious Diseases , 49 ( 8 ), 1175 – 1184 . risks. Clinical Microbiology Reviews , 10 (3 ), 505 – 520 . Rossi , F. , Diaz , L. , Wollam , A. , Panesso , D. , Zhou , Y. , Malani , A. , Richards , P. , Kapila , S. , Otto , M. , Czerwinski , J. , Rincon , S. , … Arias , C. ( 2014 ). Transferable vancomy- & Singal , B. ( 2013 ). Clinical and economic outcomes cin resistance in a community-associated MRSA line- from a community hospital’s antimicrobial steward- age. The New England Journal of Medicine , 370 (16 ), ship program. American Journal of Infection Control , 1524 – 1531 . 41 ( 2 ), 145 – 148 . Smith , M. , & Dahlen , N. (2013 ). Clinical practice guideline Mayo Clinic . ( 2010 ). MRSA infection . Retrieved from http:// surgical site infection prevention. Orthopaedic www.mayoclinic.com/health/mrsa/DS00735 Nursing , 32 ( 5 ), 242 – 248 . McKee , J. (2011 ). Preop screening reduces SSI rate after Smith , M. , Jacobs , L. , Rodier , L. , Taylor , A. , & Taylor-White , TJA . AAOS Now: 2011 Annual News Meeting . C. (2011 ). Clinical quality indicators: Infection proph- Retrieved from http://www.aaos.org/news/acadnews/ ylaxis for total knee arthroplasty . Orthopaedic Nursing , 2011/AAOS10_2_19.asp 30 ( 5 ), 301 – 304 . Moroski , N. , Woolwine , S. , & Schwarzkopf , R. ( 2014). Is The Joint Commission . (2015 ). Joint Commission launches preoperative staphylococcal decolonization effi cient infection prevention and HAI portal . Retrieved from in total joint arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. http://www.jointcommission.org/joint_commission_ Retrieved from http://www.arthroplastyjournal.org/ launches_infection_prevention_and_ hai_portal/ article/S0883–5403%2814%2900792-X/abstract Todar , K. (2008 ). Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (2014 ). disease . Online Textbook of Microbiology . Retrieved Healthcare wide hazards: Universal precautions . from http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/staph.html

For more than 50 additional continuing education activities on infections and infection control, go to nursingcenter.com/ce.

© 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses Orthopaedic Nursing • May/June 2015 • Volume 34 • Number 3 135 Copyright © 2015 by National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

OONJ779_LRNJ779_LR 135135 009/05/159/05/15 7:087:08 PMPM