DOCSLIB.ORG

Madras County Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Madras County Profile MADRAS/JEFFERSON COUNTY 2028 NW Berg Dr | Madras, OR 97741 541-390-6275 | www.edcoinfo.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MADRAS JEFFERSON COUNTY PROFILE MOVE * START * GROW Lake Billy Chinook Set in the open expanses of the Central Oregon high desert, Jefferson County is home to vibrant communities and prominent traded-sector businesses. The City of Madras is the closest community in Central Oregon to the Port of Portland and Seattle, offering a transportation advantage. Jefferson County is rich in natural resources, including abundant ultra-pure water, wood products, jetty quality basalt and is the largest agricultural producer in Central Oregon. The County is also home to several well established specialty manufactur- ers. Low-cost utilities and a productive workforce make the area a prime location for business. Education is important in the County. Voters have historically passed bonds and recently built the Madras campus of Central Oregon Community College, a new 600 seat performing arts center, a new sports complex and a new K-8 school in Warm Springs. Jefferson County is known for its livability, affordability, community spirit and rich mix of cultures. Family fun amenities include an aquatic center, 5-plex theater, skateboard facil- ity, annual airshow, water and snow skiing, camping, boat races, drag strip, circle track and more. Homes and land are very affordable and community leaders welcome new businesses with their friendly “can do” attitude. Jefferson County’s landscape offers snow-capped mountains, rivers, lakes and high desert plains. While each of Jefferson Coun- ty's five communities—Madras, Metolius, Culver, Warm Springs and Crooked River Ranch—are unique, all share a common de- sire for a vibrant future. For more information, contact: Quick Reference 2 Land Availability 12 Education Janet Brown, Manager Jefferson County Economic Development 2 Top Employers 14 Utilities & Telecommunications 2028 NW Berg Dr 3 Wage Information 15 Health & Emergency Services Madras, OR 97741 4 Industry Mix 16 Transportation 541-390-6275 5 Business Costs 18 Travel Distances [email protected] 7 Employment Trends 19 Topography & Climate www.edcoinfo.com 8 Housing Costs 19 Parks & Recreation 10 Valuations, Tax Rates 20 Business Resources 11 Population Growth Page 1 © Copyright EDCO 2016 MADRAS/JEFFERSON COUNTY 2028 NW Berg Dr | Madras, OR 97741 541-390-6275 | www.edcoinfo.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JEFFERSON COUNTY HAS AMPLE ROOM FOR BUSINESS Jefferson County offers affordable, accessible, and diverse land choices. Entrepreneurs and business executives are invited to take a close look at the benefits of locating or expanding a business in Jefferson County. With high speed telecommunica- tions, low cost utilities, a well-established general aviation airport, a dependable and skilled workforce and multi-modal transportation services, Jefferson County is an ideal location for business enterprises. Additionally, abundant recreational opportunities make Jefferson County a great place to live. Each community is committed to supporting business with quick permitting and custom assistance to be operational in the shortest time possible. There are over 500 acres of flat, bare industrial and airport development zoned land in Madras, with infrastructure at or nearby. Lot sizes range from less than an acre to 100+ acres. Industrially zoned sites are available in Jefferson County’s five communities; Madras, Warm Springs, Metolius, Culver and Crooked River Ranch. Public and private land owners are willing to be creative and work with business owners to MOVE * START * GROW their operations. JEFFERSON COUNTY’S TOP EMPLOYERS Jefferson County’s Top 30 Employers According to the Oregon Employment Department, over 75% of Employment Organization firms in the State have nine or fewer employees and the average 2014 2015 2016 Oregon firm employs 15 people. In Jefferson County, large em- Warm Springs Tribal Government 775 853 840 ployers have operated successfully for decades, contributing to Bright Wood Corporation 688 725 723 their ever-expanding workforce, low cost of doing business, Jefferson Co. School District (509J) 575 584 599 and business-friendly local governments. Warm Springs Natural Resources 350 350 350 Deer Ridge Correctional Facility 181 185 216 More unique are the industries represented by the County’s Keith Manufacturing Co. 190 190 205 larger employers, which include: St. Charles Madras 199 190 197 . Advanced manufacturing (Keith Manufacturing, Warm Indian Head Casino 168 184 186 Springs Composite Products, Shielding International and Jefferson County 163 157 156 Kah-Nee-Ta Resort 200 165 110 Earth20). Culver School District 95 105 105 . Aviation (Erickson Aero Tanker and Erickson Aircraft Col- Indian Health Services 100 92 97 lection). McDonald’s Restaurant – Madras 75 80 80 . Building products manufacturing (Bright Wood Corpora- Earth20 63 74 68 tion and Mid-Columbia Lumber). Mid-Columbia Lumber 70 72 62 Erickson’s Thriftway – Madras 60 60 60 . Agriculture and related services (Central Oregon Seeds, Crooked River Ranch 55 55 55 Wilbur-Ellis Ag Services, CHS Ag Services and Helena Central Oregon Seeds/Basalt Products 53 53 54 Chemical). Helena Chemical 56 52 51 Warm Springs Composite Products 40 45 46 . Tribal enterprises (Indian Head Casino, Warm Springs City of Madras 36 37 39 Power, Warm Springs Telecom, Kah-Nee-Ta Resort, Warm Warm Springs Geo Vision 35 35 35 Springs UAS (drone) Test Range). CHS Agricultural Products & Services 35 35 32 Agriculture is a predominant source of income for Jefferson Shielding International 30 32 29 County and Madras is home to Oregon State University’s Cen- Wilbur-Ellis Agricultural Services 34 35 27 tral Oregon Agricultural Research Center. According to OSU’s Erickson Aero Tanker 23 27 27 Extension Economic Information Office, Jefferson County gen- Bureau of Indian Affairs, Warm Springs 18 21 20 erated $74 million in gross farm sales in 2012, with roughly Les Schwab Madras 26 18 19 80% in crops and 20% in livestock. The County has over 60,000 Warm Springs High Lookee Lodge 18 18 18 irrigated acres in high value, specialty crops such as carrot, Warm Springs Construction 17 17 17 grass and flower seed, garlic and mint. Jefferson County’s vast Source: EDCO, April – June 2016 acreages of rangeland also support livestock, primarily cattle. Consistent with Oregon’s growth in farm products, Jefferson County has recently seen year over year increases in sales of farm and ranch commodities. Page 2 © Copyright EDCO 2016 MADRAS/JEFFERSON COUNTY 2028 NW Berg Dr | Madras, OR 97741 541-390-6275 | www.edcoinfo.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2016 AVERAGE WAGES FOR SELECT OCCUPATIONS Below are average hourly wages in Oregon, Washington, and Califor- nia. The East Cascades region’s wages are typically below those of Oregon, often 10 to 20%. Wages in Washington are typically higher than Oregon, while California wages routinely run at least 20% higher than those in Oregon. Wage Comparison for Selected Occupations (annual average, $ per hour) Occupation OR East Cascades CA WA Accountant/Auditor 31.65 29.24 34.71 35.56 Architect, except Landscape & Naval 33.26 36.32 41.45 36.61 Carpenter 20.77 20.39 24.16 25.04 Chef & Head Cook 19.49 19.03 19.60 24.93 Clinical, Counseling, and School Psychologist 34.57 29.06 39.25 34.16 Computer-Controlled Machine Tool Operator 18.90 18.74 18.02 25.47 Computer Programmer 34.69 36.49 41.93 56.27 Computer User Support Specialist 23.37 23.53 27.20 27.54 Computer Systems Analyst 40.21 37.61 43.62 46.58 Customer Service Representative 16.64 13.93 17.92 17.77 Dental Hygienist 36.98 37.20 48.31 44.54 Electrician 33.02 27.71 29.91 31.96 Electrical Engineer 41.81 36.49 54.97 50.09 Financial Manager 50.66 46.90 62.48 54.83 Food Service Manager 23.56 21.35 23.20 25.88 General & Operations Manager 46.81 38.10 50.75 57.92 Graphic Designer 23.33 21.57 26.18 26.83 Industrial Machinery Mechanic 26.39 25.97 27.27 27.20 Industrial Production Manager 43.02 39.84 48.24 49.86 Landscape Architect 27.92 23.66 38.52 31.09 Marketing Manager 49.52 43.95 72.90 66.67 Mechanical Engineer 39.01 41.42 46.77 44.53 Medical Transcriptionist 18.52 17.43 23.19 21.09 Middle School Teacher, except Special Ed 28.22 26.92 n/a n/a Multimedia Artist & Animator 30.39 n/a 38.90 36.92 Network and Computer Systems Administrator 33.96 29.87 41.68 40.70 Paralegal 26.67 22.46 27.91 27.59 Physical Therapist 38.17 36.26 44.57 40.79 Police/Sheriff Patrol Officer 30.60 28.18 43.60 35.49 Receptionist/Information Clerks 13.53 12.98 14.20 15.06 Registered Nurse 39.87 39.24 47.03 38.29 Secretary/Administrative Assistant, except Legal, 16.64 14.89 18.29 18.80 Medical, & Executive Software Developer, Applications 42.82 34.21 56.35 56.24 Software Developer, Systems Software 49.23 40.26 58.71 55.38 Supervisor, Administrative & Office Workers 24.33 22.25 27.22 n/a Supervisor, Retail Sales Workers 18.57 18.54 19.72 n/a Truck Driver, Heavy & Tractor-Trailer 19.34 19.09 20.23 21.54 Urban/Regional Planner 36.48 32.72 38.86 37.44 Sources: Oregon Employment Department, Washington State Employment Security Department, and California Employment Development Department. The data used to create these estimates came from the Occupational Employment Survey. Data is for Q2 2016 – the most recent data available. Page 3 © Copyright EDCO 2016 MADRAS/JEFFERSON COUNTY 2028 NW Berg Dr | Madras, OR 97741 541-390-6275 | www.edcoinfo.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COVERED EMPLOYMENT & PAYROLL, INDUSTRY MIX Covered employment refers to jobs that are eligible for unemployment insurance and, as such, is a good barometer of wage and sector trends.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside
    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Juniper Expansion on Adjacent Disturbed and Near-Relict Sites
    Western juniper expansion on adjacent disturbed and near-relict sites By: Peter T. Soulé and Paul A. Knapp Soulé, P.T., and Knapp, P.A. (1999) Western juniper expansion on adjacent disturbed and near-relict sites. Journal of Range Management 52(5):525-533. Made available courtesy of Society for Range Management: http://www.rangelands.org/ ***Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from the Society for Range Management. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document.*** Abstract: We determined rates of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis spp. occidentalis Hook.) density and cover change during the period 1951 to 1994 at 3 adjacent sites with nearly identical elevation, slope, aspect, soils, plant communities, and climate, but different land-use histories. The 3 sites are located in central Oregon at the confluence of the Deschutes and Crooked Rivers. Two of the sites are typical of central Oregon rangelands in that they have a history of anthropogenic disturbance including active fire suppression and domestic livestock grazing. The third site is a relict mesa that is a protected Research Natural Area and has experienced minimal anthropogenic impacts. We used large scale aerial photography to determine cover and density of western juniper in 1951, 1956, 1961, 1972, 1982, and 1994. We found that western juniper density and cover during the last 4 decades increased at all sites, with changes on the relict site similar to those on one of the disturbed sites. We suggest that even though 2 of the traditionally cited causes of western juniper expansion since the late 1800s (altered fire regimes, domestic livestock grazing) may have contributed to expansion on our disturbed sites, these mechanisms can not explain expansion on the near-relict mesa.
    [Show full text]
  • DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026-EA BLM Beach Site
    BLM Beach EA Number: DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026-EA Date of Preparation: September, 2010 Deschutes Resource Area, Prineville, Oregon BLM Beach EA # DOI-BLM-OR-P060-2010-0026 Contents CONTENTS......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................II 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ...............................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1 1.2 SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ....................................................1 1.3 PROPOSED ACTION ..........................................................................................3 1.4 PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................9 1.5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT .......................................................9 1.6 CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE PLANS, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS .................................................................................................................11 2.0 ALTERNATIVES...............................................................................................12 2.1 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN DETAIL .................................................12 2.2 ALTERNATIVES AND ACTION ELEMENTS CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED FROM DETAILED EVALUATION ........................................21
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Lake Billy Chinook Water Quality Study Results
    2015 LAKE BILLY CHINOOK WATER QUALITY STUDY RESULTS Prepared for Deschutes River Alliance by Rick Hafele - February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .............................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................. 1 Survey Methods....................................................................... 3 Results....................................................................................... 7 Discussion .............................................................................. 18 References ................................................................................ 23 Appendix A ............................................................................. 24 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Deschutes River Alliance thanks Greg McMillan, Rick Hafele, and Larry Marxer for their many hours of volunteer work to collect the water quality data contained in this report. Larry Marxer deserves a special thanks for developing and writing the monitoring plan, organizing equipment, and making sure proper procedures were followed throughout this project. In addition a special thanks to the Oregon Wildlife Foundation and Fly Fishers Club of Oregon for providing critical funding needed for this study, and the Freshwater Trust their helpful comments. Last, thanks to all those not mentioned here who care about the Deschutes River and have contributed hours of their time to better understand the river’s changing ecology, and to all those who have provided
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Billy Chinook Rainbow (Redband) Trout Life History Study — Final Report
    Lake Billy Chinook Rainbow (Redband) Trout Life History Study — Final Report Pelton Round Butte Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2030 Prepared for Portland General Electric Company by Kristy Groves Dr. Barbara Shields Alex Gonyaw Oregon State University December 1999 Final Report draft 4.doc 12/16/99 Table of Contents List of Tables.................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................viii Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Study Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2 1. Inter-Relationships among Redband Trout (Sub) Populations .............................. 2 2. Differences in Biological Characteristics of (Sub) Populations............................. 3 3. Diet and Prey Studies ............................................................................................. 3 4. Densities of Juvenile Redband Trout ..................................................................... 3 5. Future Genetic Studies ........................................................................................... 3 Study Area.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked River National Grassland
    2 States iiiient of d!ure I Service IC iwest 91 Part 2 Crooked River National Grassland Caring for the Land. .. Land and Resource Management Plan Preface Crooked River National Grassland August 1989 The Crooked River National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Grassland Plan) was prepared in compliance with 36 CFR 219, based on the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act of 1976, and in compliance with 40 CFR 1500 based on the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Because the Plan is a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, an environmental impact statement (EIS) was pre- pared The Plan provides direction for implementing the preferred alternative selected in the EIS. If any particular provision of this Grassland Plan, or the application of the action to any person or circumstance,is found to beinvalid, the remainder of the Forest Plan and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Additional information about the Plan is available from: Forest Supervisor Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 Earle Layser Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 Craig Conrtright Ochoco National Forest PO Box 490 Prineville, OR 97754 CROOKED RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLAND PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Purpose ... ... 1-1 Relationship to Other Documents. .. ........ 1-2 Plan Structure ............ ..... .... .. 1-3 Grassland Description ......... ........ ... 1-4 CHAPTER 2 - THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Introduc~on................................................... 2-1 Resource Description and Supply/Demand Projections for Selected Resources ..
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6. Coastal Recovery Unit—Lower Deschutes River Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 6. Coastal Recovery Unit—Lower Deschutes River Critical Habitat Unit 253 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 6 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 6. Lower Deschutes River Critical Habitat Unit The Lower Deschutes River CHU is essential to the conservation of bull trout because populations here are genetically diverse; have diverse life history expressions including fluvial, adfluvial, and resident populations with extensive connectivity within and outside the CHU; and are the most robust in this part of the Mid-Columbia RU. The Deschutes River basin contains a variety of representative habitats, including high Cascade headwater streams, glacially fed streams, spring systems, lake habitat, and mainstem river habitat. Maintaining and recovering these populations will ensure conservation of adaptations to these unique habitats, and adequate redundancy within this basin and relative to adjacent core areas (e.g., Hood River, John Day River, etc.). Protecting and maintaining all five of the Deschutes River basin’s bull trout populations will help ensure the long-term viability of these bull trout by protecting a geographically widespread distribution of unique but related bull trout (see Appendix 1 for more detailed information). The Lower Deschutes River Critical Habitat Unit is located in Wasco, Sherman, Jefferson, Deschutes, and Crook counties in central Oregon. The Deschutes River basin contains a variety of representative habitats including high Cascade headwater streams, glacially fed streams, spring systems, lakes, and mainstem river habitat. The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation (CTWS) own lands in this CHU.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers Grazing Management Program Environmental Impact Statement DRAFT
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management District Office PO. Box 550 Prineville, Oregon of the OF LAND MANAGEMENT Prineville District Office P.O. Box 550 Prineville, Oregon 97754 Enclosed for your review and comment is the Brothers Grazing Management Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The statement analyzes the-impacts which would result from the proposed livestock management program and four alternatives. The purpose of the statement is to disclose the probable environmental impacts for consideration along with economic and technical information in the decisionmaking process. Comments concerning the adequacy of this statement will be considered in the preparation of the final environmental impact statement. The comment period will end June Informal discussion sessions intended to assist you in reviewing and commenting on the draft EIS will be held at 7:00 p.m., May 251982, at St. Joseph’s Parish Hall, 150 East First St., Prineville, Oregon and at 7:00 p.m., May 26, 1982, at the Bend Riverhouse Motor Inn, 3075 North Highway 97, Bend, Oregon. Bureau of Land Management personnel will be available at both sessions to answer questions regarding the draft EIS analysis. The draft EIS may be incorporated into the final EIS by reference only. The final EIS then would consist of public comments and responses and any needed changes of the draft. Therefore, please retain this Draft EIS for use with the final. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be considered in the decision process, even though they may be too late be specifically addressed in the final environmental impact statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Quail Translocations in Eastern Oregon
    MOUNTAIN QUAIL TRANSLOCATIONS IN EASTERN OREGON Project Report: 2003 Rick Vetter 03 Michael Pope1, Faculty Research Associate Oregon State University Greg Jackle, Wildlife Biologist Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Dave Budeau, Upland Game Bird Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Dave Zalunardo, Wildlife Biologist Ochoco National Forest Contact Information: 1104 Nash Hall, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 Ph: 541-737-4908 Email: [email protected] 2 Executive Summary Mountain Quail populations have declined in many areas of the western Great Basin, particularly across former ranges in southeastern Washington, western Idaho, and eastern Oregon. Strategies for restoring declining wildlife populations have been largely reactive with recovery programs typically initiated only after populations or suitable habitats reached critically low levels. Restoration plans were often implemented without a clear understanding of the life-history or habitat requirements of a species. Griffith et al. (1989) suggested conducting research and testing restoration techniques on species before populations reached crisis levels. Mountain Quail are an excellent candidate for translocations given the criteria proposed by Griffith et al. (1989). This species is highly productive with large clutches (10-12 eggs/clutch), and has a highly varied, mostly herbivorous diet. Currently, western Oregon has abundant and easily accessible populations of Mountain Quail that could be a source for re-establishing or supplementing populations in areas of eastern Oregon where populations are rare or have been extirpated. In 2001, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Game Bird Program at Oregon State University initiated a Mountain Quail translocation and research program for eastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • County Natural Resources Policy
    Crook County Oregon Natural Resources Policy Crook County Board of County Commissioners CROOK COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN REVISION 013 1 | Page Table of Contents Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Revision .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Crook County Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 Land Use & Management ......................................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture & Timber ............................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation & Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 10 Wilderness and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................................................................... 10 Principles for Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • Bend Doris Lake – Great Day Trip; 2.7 Mile Hike to Not Enough Time to Go Fishing? Think Again – If You Live in the Bend, Redmond, Prineville, Picturesque Lake
    Getting off the beaten track Common Fish If you prefer getting away from the crowds, there are several nearby hike-in lakes that offer calm, quiet and good fishing. 50 places The following all are just a short hike away: to go fishing within Todd Lake – short .5 mile hike in; brook trout up to 15-inches. Rainbow trout Redband trout Brook trout Blow Lake – good hike-n-fish opportunity for kids; 90 minutes swimming in July and Aug. of Bend Doris Lake – great day trip; 2.7 mile hike to Not enough time to go fishing? Think again – if you live in the Bend, Redmond, Prineville, picturesque lake. Sisters or LaPine areas there are a number of great fishing spots just a short drive away. Make sure you Deer Lake – good early season fishing for brook and read the Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations, and why not grab a friend or family member to go with you? Brown trout Atlantic salmon cutthroat trout. Kokanee The times and distances listed are from Drake Park in Bend. Lucky Lake – abundant brook trout; moderate 1-2) Crane Prairie Reservoir, Sunriver – 6) East Davis Campground 1.3 mile hike. 39 mi., 70 min. Rosary Lakes – series of three hike-in lakes; lowest is Redband rainbow trout, hatchery rainbow trout, brook a 2.5 mile hike; all are easily fished with a spinning rod. trout, largemouth bass, kokanee 7) Sparks Lake, Bend – 25 mi., 36 min. Spectacular views and excellent boat fishing for Cutthroat trout, brook trout Square Lake – popular hike lake-in near Santiam Pass; Largemouth Bass Smallmouth Bass Bullhead trout and bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Permanently Close Commercial and Recreational Beaver Trapping and Hunting on Federal Lands in Oregon
    Petition to Initiate Rulemaking to Amend OAR 635-050-0070 to Permanently Close Commercial and Recreational Beaver Trapping and Hunting on Federally-Managed Public Lands and the Waters that Flows Through These Lands Brought before the Oregon Fish and Game Commission on September 10, 2020 Beaver ponds provide an “emerald refuge” in a landscape burned by the Sharps Fire, Idaho. Photo: Joe Wheaton https://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/beavers-water-and-fire-a-new-formula-for-success/ Table of Contents I. PETITIONERS ........................................................................................................................4 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................5 III. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................8 IV. LEGAL GROUNDS FOR PETITION ................................................................................. 12 V. AMERICAN BEAVER ........................................................................................................ 13 A. Biology ...................................................................................................................................... 13 B. Population Status ....................................................................................................................... 15 Trapping/Hunting Impacts on Beaver Populations ....................................................... 15 Beaver Response to Trapping
    [Show full text]