DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of ACF's Livelihood Projects in Abkhazia Funded by UNHCR in 2011-2013 EXTERNAL EVALUATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of ACF's Livelihood Projects in Abkhazia Funded by UNHCR in 2011-2013 EXTERNAL EVALUATION EXTERNAL EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 2014 Evaluation of ACF’s Livelihood Projects in Abkhazia funded by UNHCR in 2011-2013 Funded by Photos ©Matteo Modè UNHCR By Matteo Modè This report was commissioned by Action Against Hunger | ACF International. The comments contained herein reflect the opinions of the Evaluators only. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of ACF and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of UNHCR. Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Background and Context ....................................................................................................................... 7 4 Projects description .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 2011 project .................................................................................................................................. 9 4.2 2012 project ................................................................................................................................ 10 4.3 2013 project ................................................................................................................................ 11 5 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 12 5.1 Data and information sources .................................................................................................... 12 5.2 Selection of interviewees ............................................................................................................ 12 5.3 Evaluation criteria ....................................................................................................................... 14 6 Scope and limitations of the evaluation ............................................................................................. 15 6.1 Scope of the evaluation .............................................................................................................. 15 6.2 Limitations of the evaluation ...................................................................................................... 15 7 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 15 7.1 Relevance .................................................................................................................................... 15 7.2 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................... 17 7.3 Efficiency ..................................................................................................................................... 23 7.4 Impact ......................................................................................................................................... 24 7.5 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 26 7.6 Complementarity/coherence ...................................................................................................... 27 7.7 Coverage ..................................................................................................................................... 28 7.8 DAC results’ matrix and overall performance of projects .......................................................... 29 8 Best practices ...................................................................................................................................... 31 8.1 Best practice 1 – Using previous project expertise and achievements ...................................... 31 8.2 Best practice 2 - Referral of beneficiaries ................................................................................... 31 8.3 Best practice 3 – Specialized training ......................................................................................... 31 9 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 32 10 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 32 11 Annexes ........................................................................................................................................... 35 2 11.1 Agenda of field work ................................................................................................................... 35 11.2 List of persons interviewed ......................................................................................................... 36 11.3 List of documents consulted ....................................................................................................... 38 11.4 Terms of reference of the evaluation ......................................................................................... 39 3 Abbreviations ACF – Action Contre la Faim ATC – Agricultural Training Centre DAC – Development Assistance Committee (see OECD) DL – Dividing Line DV – Domestic Violence GA – Grant assistance IDP – Internally Displaced Person (s) IGA – Income Generating Activity INGO – International Non-Governmental Organisation NGO – Non-Governmental Organisation OECD – Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation SGBV – Sexualised and Gender Based Violence TOT – Training of Trainers UNDP – United Nations Development Programme UNHCR – United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF - United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund VTC – Vocational Training Centre 4 1 Executive Summary This project presents the findings of an independent evaluation of three livelihoods projects funded by UNHCR and implemented by ACF in Abkhazia in 2011, 2012 and 2013. These projects were aimed at improving the livelihoods and self-reliance of beneficiaries via vocational and business training opportunities and via the distribution of grants to support the start-up and development of small business. Although these are three separate projects in terms of planning and budget, they share the same approach and delivery modality, with variations in terms of targeting of beneficiaries and activities supported via grant assistance. This evaluation uses the OECD DAC guidelines and principles to assess the performance of the projects according to a set of standardised criteria. Based on the findings, this report presents a set of recommendations and best practices to guide the implementation of future projects. The evaluation found the projects to be highly relevant in the context of high unemployment, lack of economic opportunities and vulnerability faced by people living in the projects’ area, given the focus on improving skills, confidence, livelihoods and self-reliance of beneficiaries. The projects have been highly effective in conducting and delivering a range of training programmes and in supporting the start-up and expansion of small businesses on a range of activities. The projects have made effective use of the experience and the assets developed by ACF under previous projects. At individual and household level, the projects have been moderately effective in improving the livelihoods of beneficiaries in terms of increased income and self-reliance. The projects have been more effective in supporting trade and service related activities taking place in urban and peri-urban areas and less effective with supporting seasonal and livestock related activities. The projects have been moderately efficient in the implementation of training activities and in the selection of beneficiaries and distribution of start-up grants. Some projects’ activities are more time and cost intensive than others, such as selection, verification and monitoring of beneficiaries. Efficiency is also affected by the cost per capita of delivering business, vocational and confidence building training in relation to the number of people trained and beneficiaries receiving grants. The projects had a positive impact in increasing the self-confidence and capacity of beneficiaries via training and provision of technical skills. Beneficiaries have increased their knowledge on business practices, acquired new vocational skills and received specialized training that they have been able to put into practice. On the other hand, the projects had an overall moderate impact on the livelihoods of beneficiaries receiving grants, although there are individual cases where the impact was high. Findings suggest that activities related to trade and services have had a higher impact on livelihoods, while others such as livestock and seasonal activities had less. Findings also suggest that grants had less impact on the livelihoods of more vulnerable people, which are less resilient in the event of a crisis and more prone to sell assets received via in grant assistance. Motivation and ownership have also proved to be important factors behind the successful use of grants for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rr"^~N I SEP 2 2 2006 W
    • e E-I v E p\ L —^rr"^~n I SEP 2 2 2006 W Note to Ms. Barcena EXECUTIVE OFFIC? 0? THE SECRETARY-GEf JERAL UNOMIG: Draft Report of the Secretary-General on the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia 1. Please fmdjittached,,_fpr the Secretary-General's apprpyal the draft report on the situation in Abkhazia, Georgia. This is a mandate renewal report - the current mandate of UNOMIG expires on 15 October 2006. The report is to be issued on 2 October 2006; the Troop and Police Contributors meeting and the Security Council consultations are scheduled for 6 October. 2. The report covers the main developments in the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict since the last report of 26 June 2006 and the Security Council's adoption of resolution 1666 on 31 March 2006. A key development was the large-scale Georgian special operation in the upper Kodori Valley in July, as a result of which some military elements were re-introduced in that area in contravention of the 1994 Moscow Agreement on a Ceasefire and Separation of Forces. The Georgian side also refused to accept participation by the CIS peacekeeping force in monitoring the upper Kodori Valley jointly with UNOMIG. As a consequence, the peace process practically came to a halt as the Abkhaz side required demilitarization of the upper Kodori valley as a pre-condition for the resumption of dialogue on the broader negotiation agenda. The Georgian operation also took place against the background of the adoption, by the Georgian Parliament, of a resolution requesting the Georgian Government to start procedures to withdraw the CIS peacekeeping force from the conflict zone.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of the Public Organization the «International Fund Apsny
    REPORT Of the Public Organization The «International Fund Apsny» 2016 The Public organization "International Foundation Apsny" was founded in March 2015 by the following individuals: Sener Gogua, Daur Arshba, Slava Sakaniya, Oktay Chkotua, Maxim Gvindzhia, Asida Inapshba, Sirma Ashuba, Roin Agrba, Beslan Kvitsinia, Astamur Logua, Julia Gumba, Beslan Kvarchia, Erkan Kutarba. The aims of organization are to promote a merger the unification of Abkhazian people around the world. The "International Foundation Apsny" prepares and implements projects that address demographic, social, cultural and other issues related to the development of state. Moreover, the organization develops favorable conditions for the participation of the Abkhazian diaspora in the socio - economic life of Abkhazia. The organization is highly involved in charity work. The «International Fund Apsny» is structured in the following way: President – Gogua Sener Nedzhemovich Vice-President - Gvindzhia Maxim Kharitonovich Secretary General - Inapshba Ashida Vladimirovna 1. Committee on International Relations - Gvindzhia Maxim Kharitonovich 2. Committee on Media and Public Relations - Amkuab Guram Artemovich 3. Committee on Apsuara - Chkotua Oktay Bekirovich 4. Committee on Population and Repatriation - Ashoba Syrma Pavlovna 5. Committee on Economic Development, Investments and Finance - Kvarchia Beslan A. 6. Committee on Culture and Education - Logua Nugzar Chichikoevich 7. Committee on Social Policy - Yulia Gumba Sabrievna 8. Committee on Youth Policy - Agrba Simon Zakanovich
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation Within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report
    2013:19 Sida Decentralised Evaluation Vera Devine Susanna Dellas Jessica Rothman Ian Christoplos Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report Review of the Swedish Development Cooperation within the Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, Georgia, 2011-2013 Final Report May 2013 Vera Devine Susanna Dellans with Jessica Rothman and Ian Christoplos Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:19 Sida Authors: Vera Devine and Susanna Dellans, with Jessica Rothman and Ian Christoplos The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida Decentralised Evaluation 2013:18 Commissioned by The Embassy of Sweden in Georgia Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: May 2013 Published by Citat 2013 Art. no. Sida61608en urn:nbn:se:sida-61608en This publication can be downloaded from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: S-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Office: Valhallavägen 199, Stockholm Telephone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Telefax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64 Postgiro: 1 56 34–9. VAT. No. SE 202100-478901 E-mail: [email protected]. Homepage: http://www.sida.se Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. 3 Preface .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 the Curse of Displacement
    1 2 The curse of displacement: Local narratives of forced expulsion and 3 the appropriation of abandoned property in Abkhazia 4 5 Andrea Peinhopf, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London 6 7 8 Abstract. Since the end of the Georgian-Abkhaz war, the often-precarious status of the Georgians 9 displaced from Abkhazia has received significant academic attention. In contrast, the 10 consequences of displacement from the reverse perspective – how it has affected the people who 11 stayed behind – remains underanalysed. Drawing on narratives collected during several months 12 of ethnographic fieldwork, this paper argues that although ethnic Abkhazians see themselves as 13 victims of ethnic violence rather than perpetrators, the re-distribution of Georgian property 14 nevertheless caused significant distress. Many condemned the practice of appropriation, 15 suggesting that taking what is not one’s own is not only a violation of the property of the original 16 owner, but also of the Abkhaz moral code and therefore shameful. To them, the trophy houses 17 were a curse, both literally – as spaces haunted by former occupants – and metaphorically, as a 18 source and reminder of a certain “moral corruption” within Abkhazian society. However, while 19 the stories around the trophy houses reflect substantial intra-communal divisions, I suggest that 20 they are also an expression of a shared post-war experience. Like the horror stories of Georgian 21 violence, and those of Abkhaz heroism, they have become part of an intimate
    [Show full text]
  • 96 25 June 2017
    No. 96 25 June 2017 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html TRANSBORDER TRADE Special Editors: Philippe Rudaz and Susanne Fehlings ■■The Chinese Connection—Informal Trade Relations between the Caucasus and China Since the Early 1990s 2 By Susanne Fehlings (Goethe University Frankfurt) ■■Moscow Azerbaijani-Juhuro “Oligarchs” and the Eurasian Trade Networks 5 By Chen Bram (Truman Institute, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) ■■Suddenly a Border: Hazelnut Trade across the De Facto Border between Abkhazia and the Zugdidi Municipal Region of Georgia 9 By Ketevan Khutsishvili (Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University) Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 96, 25 June 2017 2 The Chinese Connection—Informal Trade Relations between the Caucasus and China Since the Early 1990s By Susanne Fehlings (Goethe University Frankfurt) Abstract This article surveys informal trade between the Caucasus and China since the early 1990s. Starting with the initial commercial activities of singular entrepreneurs from the Caucasus—here taken to refer to Arme- nia and Georgia—who began travelling to China for purposes of trade immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I move to current business relations between Caucasian businessmen and women and their Chinese partners and to the growing influence of Chinese entrepreneurs who come to the Caucasus for trade. Introduction ing large-scale companies, and individual entrepreneurs This article offers a survey of informal transnational and local traders, similarly adapt to local business envi- trade between the Caucasus—specifically Armenia and ronments and political frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GEOGRAPHY of ETHNIC VIOLENCE This Page Intentionally Left Blank the GEOGRAPHY of ETHNIC VIOLENCE
    THE GEOGRAPHY OF ETHNIC VIOLENCE This page intentionally left blank THE GEOGRAPHY OF ETHNIC VIOLENCE IDENTITY, INTERESTS, AND THE INDIVISIBILITY OF TERRITORY Monica Duffy Toft PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright ᭧ 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved ISBN: 0-691-11354-8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Toft, Monica Duffy, 1965– The geography of ethnic violence: identity, interests, and the indivisibility of territory / Monica Duffy Toft. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-11354-8 (alk. paper) 1. Political violence. 2. Partition, Territorial. 3. Nationalism. 4. Human geography. 5. Ethnic conflict—Former Soviet republics—Case studies. 6. Former Soviet republics—Ethnic relations—Case studies. I. Title. JC328.6 .T64 2003 303.6—dc21 2002042463 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Galliard. Printed on acid-free paper. ϱ www.pupress.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 10987654321 To Ivan This page intentionally left blank Contents Illustrations ix Preface xi 1. The Forgotten Meaning of Territory 1 2. Indivisible Territory and Ethnic War 17 3. Territory and Violence: A Statistical Assessment 34 4. Russia and Tatarstan 45 5. Russia and Chechnya 64 6. Georgia and Abkhazia 87 7. Georgia and Ajaria 107 8. Conclusion 127 Appendix Tables 149 Notes 167 References 203 Index 219 This page intentionally left blank Illustrations Tables 2.1. Ethnic Groups and the Demand for Sovereignty 26 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats of Russian Hard and Soft Power in Georgia
    THREATS OF RUSSIAN HARD AND SOFT POWER IN GEORGIA Tbilisi 2016 THREATS OF RUSSIAN HARD AND SOFT POWER IN GEORGIA European Initiative - Liberal Academy Tbilisi is a non-governmental, nonprofit organisation, committed to promote core democratic values, supporting peace-building and European and Euro-Atlantic integration and with that foster- ing the democratic development. The views, opinions and statements expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs only and do not necessarily reflect the position of ”The German Marshal Fund of The United States” . Therefore, the ”The German Marshal Fund of The United States” is not responsible for the content of the information material. Project Director: Lasha Tughushi Reviewer: Davit Aprasidze Administrative Supervisor:Ana Tsikhelashvili Project team: Russian Soft Power:Lasha Tugushi, Malkhaz Gagua, Gogita Gvedashvili, Nino Lapachi Economic Analysis: Giorgi Gaganidze Security Perceptions of the Russian - Georgian Confrontation Process:Giorgi Dzebisashvili Military Threats from Russia, Conflict zones; and its Regional Dimension:Giorgi Muchaidze Political and Socioeconomic Situations in the Conflict Regions:Levan Geradze Security Sector: Davit Sikharulidze Editing: Irina Kakoiashvili, Alina chaganava, Alastair George Maclaud Watt, Inge Snip Design: Elena Eltisheva , Aleko Jikuridze, Translation: Tamar Neparidze, Lali Buskivadze © European Initiative - Liberal Academy Tbilisi 50/1 Rustaveli av.,0108, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel/Fax: + (995 32) 293 11 28 Website http://www.ei-lat.ge Email: [email protected] THREATS OF RUSSIAN HARD AND SOFT POWER IN GEORGIA PREface Russia has been playing an extremely negative role in Georgia’s modern development. This is demonstrated by the de-facto annexation of almost 20% of the territory of Georgia, and also by constant attempts to change the foreign policy choices that Georgia has made, as well as their excessive interference in the domestic political processes and explicit usage of various methods of influence, including aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Obituary Bagapsh
    SERGEJ BAGAPSH Sergej Bagapsh, the second president of the Republic of Abkhazia, died in office on 29 May in a Moscow hospital of complications following lung-surgery the previous week. He was 62. Bagapsh was born in Abkhazia’s capital, Sukhum, on 4 March 1949. He trained as an agronomist at the local Institute of Subtropical Agriculture. After military service, however, he made his career in the structure of the Soviet Communist Party, serving in various capacities during most of the 1970s in the youth-organisation known as the Komsomol. But his first prominent position was as First Secretary of the Ochamchira District, home to his family’s native village of Dzhgerda in the south-east of Abkhazia. He occupied this post from 1982 to 1989, which year saw critical developments in Abkhaz-Georgian relations, leading to Abkhazia’s long-desired secession from Georgia in the wake of their bitter war (14 August 1992 – 30 September 1993). Reacting to the threat emanating from Georgian nationalism as the Kremlin’s grip on the Soviet republics slackened under perestrojka, the Abkhazians took steps to protect their interests and opposed the establishment in Sukhum of a branch of Tbilisi State University. The Abkhazians saw this as an attempt to undermine the viability of the Abkhazian State University, only the second institution of higher education in what was then Soviet Georgia. On the night of Saturday 15 July, fatalities occurred in Sukhum as the communities came to blows. Large numbers of armed men rallied to the cause in the neighbouring Georgian province of Mingrelia.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt7hc733q3.Pdf
    UC Berkeley GAIA Research Series Title The Myth of "Ethnic Conflict": Politics, Economics, and "Cultural" Violence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hc733q3 Journal Research Series, uciaspubs/research/98 Authors Crawford, Beverly Lipschutz, Ronnie D. Publication Date 1998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Edited by Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz Description: In the last decade, discourses of economic and political liberalization and globalization have swept the world. Yet during this same period and all across the globe, many states are fragmenting and more than 30 ethnic and sectarian conflicts have displaced or killed millions of people — and far more civilians than soldiers. The authors in this volume argue that much of this violence is closely linked to those globalizing forces and demands for economic liberalization which have weakened states' capacities, both political and financial, for redistributing resources. As a result, many states have been forced to break established social contracts, often dramatically changing power relations in heterogeneous societies that previously had been relatively stable. Drawing on case studies from Asia, Eastern Europe, North Africa, the former Soviet Union, and the United States, the authors demonstrate how these distributional issues and power shifts have been experienced as ethnic and religious discrimination and are often at the root of identity politics and violent, so-called “cultural,” conflicts. RESEARCH SERIES / NUMBER 98 The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Editors UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The myth of “ethnic conflict” : politics, economics, and “cultural” violence / Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus Globalization
    Volume 3 Issue 2-3 2009 1 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION INSTITUTE O STRATEGIC STUDIES O THE CAUCASUS THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies Volume 3 Issue 2-3 2009 CA&CC Press® SWEDEN 2 Volume 3 Issue 2-3 2009 OUNDEDTHE CAUCASUS AND& GLOBALIZATION PUBLISHED BY INSTITUTE O STRATEGIC STUDIES O THE CAUCASUS Registration number: M-770 Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic PUBLISHING HOUSE CA&CC Press® Sweden Registration number: 556699-5964 Registration number of the journal: 1218 Editorial Council Eldar Chairman of the Editorial Council (Baku) ISMAILOV Tel/fax: (994 12) 497 12 22 E-mail: [email protected] Kenan Executive Secretary (Baku) ALLAHVERDIEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Azer represents the journal in Russia (Moscow) SAFAROV Tel: (7 495) 937 77 27 E-mail: [email protected] Nodar represents the journal in Georgia (Tbilisi) KHADURI Tel: (995 32) 99 59 67 E-mail: [email protected] Ayca represents the journal in Turkey (Ankara) ERGUN Tel: (+90 312) 210 59 96 E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Nazim Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) MUZAFFARLI Tel: (994 – 12) 499 11 74 E-mail: [email protected] (IMANOV) Vladimer Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Georgia) PAPAVA Tel: (995 – 32) 24 35 55 E-mail: [email protected] Akif Deputy Editor-in-Chief (Azerbaijan) ABDULLAEV Tel: (994 – 12) 596 11 73 E-mail: [email protected] Volume 3 IssueMembers 2-3 2009 of Editorial Board: 3 THE CAUCASUS & GLOBALIZATION Zaza Doctor of History, professor, Corresponding member of the Georgian National Academy ALEKSIDZE of Sciences, head of the scientific department of the Korneli Kekelidze Institute of Manuscripts (Georgia) Mustafa Professor, Ankara University (Turkey) AYDIN Irina D.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia 2014 Human Rights Report
    GEORGIA 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT Note: Except where otherwise noted, figures and other data do not include the occupied regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The constitution of Georgia provides for an executive branch that reports to the prime minister, a unicameral parliament, and a separate judiciary. The government is accountable to parliament. The president is the head of state and commander in chief. Parliamentary elections in 2012 marked the first democratic transfer of power since the country’s independence. In the October 2013 presidential election, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) concluded that the vote “was efficiently administered, transparent and took place in an amicable and constructive environment.” While the election results reflected the will of the people, observers raised several concerns, including allegations of political pressure at the local level, inconsistent application of the election code, and limited oversight of campaign finance violations. Security forces reported to civilian authorities. The most important human rights problems reported during the year were the following: societal/interpersonal violence, including domestic violence and politically motivated violence; increased societal intolerance of members of minority groups, as reflected in hate speech, interference with religious worship, and intimidation that prevented freedom of assembly; and persistent shortcomings in the legal system that led to incomplete investigations, premature charging of suspects, and inappropriate use of pretrial detention. Other problems reported during the year included abuse by law enforcement officials; substandard prison conditions; allegations of political influence in the administration of justice; allegations of improper electronic surveillance; pressure on opposition figures to withdraw from local elections; and substandard living conditions for internally displaced persons (IDPs).
    [Show full text]