In the Issue of Monday, May 22, 2000 the Inside Cover Should Read 32007–33246
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Division of Law Enforcement
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Division of Law Enforcement Annual Report FY 2000 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, working with others, conserves, protects, and enhances fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. As part of this mission, the Service is responsible for enforcing U.S. and international laws, regulations, and treaties that protect wildlife resources. Cover photo by J & K Hollingsworth/USFWS I. Overview ..................................................................................................................1 Program Evolution and Priorities......................................................................2 Major Program Components ..............................................................................2 FY 2000 Investigations Statistical Summary (chart) ....................................3 FY 1999-2000 Wildlife Inspection Activity (chart) ..........................................6 Table of Laws Enforced ......................................................................................................7 Contents II. Organizational Structure ........................................................................................9 III. Regional Highlights ..............................................................................................14 Region One ..........................................................................................................14 Region Two ..........................................................................................................26 -
7–26–04 Vol. 69 No. 142 Monday July
7–26–04 Monday Vol. 69 No. 142 July 26, 2004 Pages 44457–44574 VerDate jul 14 2003 22:41 Jul 23, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\26JYWS.LOC 26JYWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 142 / Monday, July 26, 2004 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing. -
The Journal of Typographic Research Volume I, Umber L,January 1967
The Journal of Typographic Research Volume I, umber l , January 1967 5 E fTects of Three T ypographical Variables on Speed of Reading R ichard H. Wiggins 19 The Diacriti cal Marketing System and a Preliminary Comparison with the I nitial Teaching Alphabet Edward Fry 31 Printing for the Visually Handicapped J. H. Prince 49 Line can tandards for Characters and Symbols: a Practical Study C. J. Duncan 63 The Perspectives for Practical Optical Character Recognition l\I. Nadler 69 T ypographical EfTects by Cathode Ray Tube T ypesetting Systems F. C. Holland 80 On-Line Visual Correction and Make-up Systems-I : Hardware C. I. Cowan :,o Readability as a Function of the Straightness of Right-hand Margins Ralph Fabrizio, Ira Kaplan, and Gilbert Teal 96 Secondary Uses of Letters in Language Yakov l\Ialkiel 111 The Authors The Journal of Typographic R esearch, Volume I, Number I, J anuary 1967. Published four times a year (January, April, July, and October) for Dr. i\rerald E. Wrolstad by The Press of Western Rese1ve Universi ty, 2029 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 4+ 106. Copyright © 1967 by The Press of Western Reserve Universi ty. Dr. Merald E. Wrolstad, Editor and Publisher Correspondence on editorial matters should be addressed to the editor, c/o The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U.S.A. EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. G. W. Ovink, Lettergieterij Amsterdam Dr. Christopher Poulton, Applied Psychology Research Unit, Cambridge, England Dr. J ack Z. Sissors, Northwestern University Dr. Miles A. Tinker, Emeritus Professor, University of Minnesota Dr. Bror Zachrisson, Director, Grafiska Institutct, Stockholm ADVISORY COUNCIL John Dreyfus, Monotype Corporation, et al. -
Small-Business Owners from Widely Varied Industries
No. 17-71 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________ WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ET AL., Respondents. ________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ________________ BRIEF OF SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS ________________ Kevin J. Lynch J. Carl Cecere UNIVERSITY OF DENVER Counsel of Record STURM COLLEGE OF LAW CECERE PC ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 6035 McCommas Blvd. CLINIC Dallas, TX 75206 2255 E. Evans Ave. (469) 600-9455 Denver, CO 80208 [email protected] (303) 871-6039 Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................. i Table of Authorities ............................................................. ii Interest of Amici Curiae ..................................................... 1 Introduction and Summary of the Argument .................. 1 Argument ............................................................................. 4 I. Protecting endangered species provides signif- icant economic benefits to small businesses. ............ 4 A. ESA regulations provide small-business opportunities. ....................................................... 4 B. The Service’s experts are an economic asset for many small-businesses. ..................... 16 C. Protection of biodiversity is also essential for the economy as a whole. .............................. 19 II. The Service’s broad, flexible authority to designate -
World Braille Usage, Third Edition
World Braille Usage Third Edition Perkins International Council on English Braille National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped Library of Congress UNESCO Washington, D.C. 2013 Published by Perkins 175 North Beacon Street Watertown, MA, 02472, USA International Council on English Braille c/o CNIB 1929 Bayview Avenue Toronto, Ontario Canada M4G 3E8 and National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., USA Copyright © 1954, 1990 by UNESCO. Used by permission 2013. Printed in the United States by the National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, Library of Congress, 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World braille usage. — Third edition. page cm Includes index. ISBN 978-0-8444-9564-4 1. Braille. 2. Blind—Printing and writing systems. I. Perkins School for the Blind. II. International Council on English Braille. III. Library of Congress. National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. HV1669.W67 2013 411--dc23 2013013833 Contents Foreword to the Third Edition .................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... x The International Phonetic Alphabet .......................................................................................... xi References ............................................................................................................................ -
Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi
Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2007 Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi Katherine E. Edwards Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Edwards, Katherine E., "Herpetofauna Communities and Habitat Conditions in Temporary Wetlands of Upland and Floodplain Forests on Public Lands in North-Central Mississippi" (2007). Theses and Dissertations. 2484. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/2484 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HERPETOFAUNA COMMUNITIES AND HABITAT CONDITIONS IN TEMPORARY WETLANDS OF UPLAND AND FLOODPLAIN FORESTS ON PUBLIC LANDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI By Katherine Elise Edwards A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Science in the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Mississippi State, Mississippi May 2007 HERPETOFAUNA COMMUNITIES AND HABITAT CONDITIONS IN TEMPORARY WETLANDS OF UPLAND AND FLOODPLAIN FORESTS ON PUBLIC LANDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI By Katherine Elise Edwards Approved: Jeanne C. Jones Kristina C. Godwin Associate Professor of Wildlife and State Director, USDA APHIS Fisheries Wildlife Services (Director of Thesis) Adjunct Faculty of Wildlife and Fisheries (Committee Member) W. Daryl Jones Bruce D. Leopold Assistant Extension Professor of Professor and Head Wildlife and Fisheries Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (Committee Member) (Committee Member) Bruce D. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2008 No. 36 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was take these men and women very seri- ment is not to tilt in favor of cycling, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- ously when they bring their message to although I could certainly make that pore (Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD). Capitol Hill. argument, but just to level the playing f Yes, bicycling is fun. We know that field. from our youth. Everybody seems to Why do some Members of Congress DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO have a bicycling story that they love think it’s all right to give tax benefits TEMPORE to tell. However, there are many rea- to commuters that burn gasoline to The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- sons why bicycling should be taken help them cushion their costs, but are fore the House the following commu- very seriously by policymakers. Con- against providing modest tax benefits nication from the Speaker: sider the times. Remember last year for those who burn calories instead? WASHINGTON, DC when oil averaged $72 per barrel and Three times the House of Representa- March 4, 2008. gasoline averaged $2.81 per gallon and tives has passed a modest reform for I hereby appoint the Honorable LUCILLE how people were deeply concerned bike commuter equity, but it has yet ROYBAL-ALLARD to act as Speaker pro tem- about those increases over just the to be enacted into law. -
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 112:9-16
This authors' personal copy may not be publicly or systematically copied or distributed, or posted on the Open Web, except with written permission of the copyright holder(s). It may be distributed to interested individuals on request. Vol. 112: 9–16, 2014 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published November 13 doi: 10.3354/dao02792 Dis Aquat Org High susceptibility of the endangered dusky gopher frog to ranavirus William B. Sutton1,2,*, Matthew J. Gray1, Rebecca H. Hardman1, Rebecca P. Wilkes3, Andrew J. Kouba4, Debra L. Miller1,3 1Center for Wildlife Health, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA 3Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee Center of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4Memphis Zoo, Conservation and Research Department, Memphis, TN 38112, USA ABSTRACT: Amphibians are one of the most imperiled vertebrate groups, with pathogens playing a role in the decline of some species. Rare species are particularly vulnerable to extinction be - cause populations are often isolated and exist at low abundance. The potential impact of patho- gens on rare amphibian species has seldom been investigated. The dusky gopher frog Lithobates sevosus is one of the most endangered amphibian species in North America, with 100−200 indi- viduals remaining in the wild. Our goal was to determine whether adult L. sevosus were suscep- tible to ranavirus, a pathogen responsible for amphibian die-offs worldwide. We tested the rela- tive susceptibility of adult L. sevosus to ranavirus (103 plaque-forming units) isolated from a morbid bullfrog via 3 routes of exposure: intra-coelomic (IC) injection, oral (OR) inoculation, and water bath (WB) exposure. -
Risk Assessment and Recommended Disease Screening
A Manual For Control of Infectious Diseases in Amphibian Survival Assurance Colonies and Reintroduction Programs Version 2.0: updated 2017 Based on: Proceedings from a Workshop: 16–18 February 2009 San Diego Zoo Cover photos courtesy of Allan Pessier and Ron Holt. A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group in collaboration with Amphibian Ark, San Diego Zoo, and Zoo Atlanta IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. © Copyright CBSG 2017 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Pessier, A.P. and J.R. Mendelson III (eds.). 2017. A Manual for Control of Infectious Diseases in Amphibian Survival Assurance Colonies and Reintroduction Programs, Ver. 2.0. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. An electronic version of this report can be downloaded at www.cbsg.org <http://www.cbsg.org/> . This project was supported by grant LG-25-08-0066 from the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Any views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. -
Annual Statistical Report for 1980
General Conference of Seventh-dayAdventists 6840 Eastern Avenue, NW, Washington, DC20012, USA Compiled b, Office of Archives and Statistics F. Donald Yost Director STATISTICAL REPORT of Seventh-day Adventist Conferences, Missions, and Institutions in the World Field For the Year Ending December 31,1980 A WORD ABOUT THIS REPORT Territorial Changes,-In :North America the Central Union and the Northern Union were New Terminology end Categories,-The North American Division has recently authorized combined and some of their local conferences were combined during 1980. This newly named two new categories of workers: credentieled commissioned minister and licensed commissioned Mid-America Union appears in this report. minister. In this first year for these categories, we have not prepared new columns but have simply The new Africa-Indian Ocean Division did not begin functioning until January 1, 1981. indicated the presence of the commissioned minister in a footnote (see pages 15 and 21). Its work will be fully represented in the next "Annual Statistical Report." As noted last year the term "elementary schools" has bean changed to "primary schools," conforming to usage common in most pate of the world. Omission of Date,-Two unions of the Trans-Africa Division did not report their workers in sufficient detail for the table "Denominational Workers Classified by Type of Employment, 1980" on page 5. Using their "total active workers" figure along with last year's figures, we Correction. In the 1979 "Annual Statistical Report" table "General Survey of Organiza- have approximated how these workers should be classified. Any inaccuracies thus produced tions," page 2, the "Total Organizations" figure for 1979 should have reed 26,705. -
Mississippi Gopher Frog (Rana Capito Sevosa) Dusky Gopher Frog
Originally listed as: Mississippi Gopher Frog (Rana capito sevosa) Formally now recognized by the USFWS (2012) as: Dusky Gopher Frog (Rana sevosa) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation (Photograph by John Tupy, Western Carolina University, used with permission) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office Jackson, Mississippi 5-YEAR REVIEW Dusky gopher frog (Rana sevosa) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review: In conducting this 5-year review, we relied on the best available information pertaining to historical and current distributions, life history, threats to, and habitats of this species. Our sources included the final rule listing this species under the Endangered Species Act (Act); peer reviewed scientific publications; unpublished field observations by Service, State and other experienced biologists; unpublished survey reports; and notes and communications from other qualified biologists or experts. We announced initiation of this review and requested information in a published Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period on July 6, 2009 (74 FR 31972). The completed draft review was sent to affected Service Field Offices and peer reviewers for their review. Comments were evaluated and incorporated where appropriate into this final document (see Appendix A). We received one public comment during the open comment period. No part of this review was contracted to an outside party. This review was completed by the Service’s lead Recovery biologist in the Mississippi Ecological Services Field Office, Jackson, Mississippi. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Southeast Region: Kelly Bibb, 404-679-7132 Lead Field Office – Jackson, Mississippi, Ecological Services Field Office: Linda LaClaire, 601-321-1126 Cooperating Field Office – Daphne, Alabama, Ecological Services Field Office: Matthias Laschet, 251-441-5842, Lafayette, Louisiana, Ecological Services Field Office: Deborah Fuller, 337-291-3124 C. -
Petition to List 53 Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States As Threatened Or Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST 53 AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE UNITED STATES AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY JULY 11, 2012 1 Notice of Petition _____________________________________________________________________________ Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Gary Frazer, Assistant Director for Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Nicole Alt, Chief Division of Conservation and Classification, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] AUTHORS Collette L. Adkins Giese Herpetofauna Staff Attorney Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 339 Circle Pines, MN 55014-0339 [email protected] 2 D. Noah Greenwald Endangered Species Program Director Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] Tierra Curry Conservation Biologist P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non- profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center is supported by over 375,000 members and on-line activists throughout the United States.