digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 2013 They’re Planting Stories In the Press: The mpI act of Media Distortions on Sex Offender Law and Policy Heather Ellis Cucolo New York Law School,
[email protected] Michael L. Perlin New York Law School,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, Disability Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cucolo, Heather Ellis and Perlin, Michael L., "They’re Planting Stories In the Press: The mpI act of Media Distortions on Sex Offender Law and Policy" (2013). Articles & Chapters. 715. http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters/715 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. "THEY'RE PLANTING STORIES IN THE PRESS": THE IMPACT OF MEDIA DISTORTIONS ON SEX OFFENDER LAW AND POLICY Heather Ellis Cucolo* and Michael L. Perlint Introduction Individuals classified as sexual predators are the pariahs of the community. Sex offenders are arguably the most despised members of our society and therefore warrant our harshest condemnation. Twenty individual states and the federal government have enacted laws confining individuals who have been adjudicated as "sexually violent predators" to civil commitment facilities post incarceration and/or conviction.2 Additionally, in many jurisdictions, offenders who are returned to the community are restricted and monitored under community notification, registration and residency limitations.3 Targeting, punishing, and ostracizing these individuals has become an obsession in society, clearly evidenced in the constant push to enact even more restrictive legislation that breaches the boundaries of constitutional protections.