DOCSLIB.ORG

In Vivo Reversion to Normal of Inherited Mutations in Humans R Hirschhorn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Vivo Reversion to Normal of Inherited Mutations in Humans R Hirschhorn 721 REVIEW J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.40.10.721 on 20 October 2003. Downloaded from In vivo reversion to normal of inherited mutations in humans R Hirschhorn ............................................................................................................................... J Med Genet 2003;40:721–728 There are increasing reports of multiple different types of DEFINITION OF TYPES OF GENETIC MOSAICISM somatic mosaicism detected in patients with inherited and Genetic mosaicism in humans was first recog- non-inherited disorders. The characteristics of several of nised and documented in disorders involving the major types of mosaicism will be outlined, and abnormalities of chromosomes, and intially because of unusual phenotypes in cases of contrasted with somatic mosaicism, which is the focus of intersex that suggested mosaicism. The ability this article. This review examines examples of somatic to visualize the X and Y sex chromosomes mosaicism due to differences in DNA sequence arising enabled identification of mosaicism for sex chromosomes as the basis for the unusual from in vivo site specific reversion to normal of inherited observations of ambiguous or intersex pheno- mutations in humans. While several known mechanisms of types.67Subsequently, routine chromosome stu- reversion are evident in a number of these examples, they dies of the autosomes revealed that many infants born with syndromes due to chromosomal are not in some others. The possible significance of the role aneuploidy are also mosaic, with some cells of selection, particularly in view of recent results of gene containing a normal chromosome complement. therapy, is discussed. Although some cases, especially involving the sex chromosomes, are due to mitotic non-disjunc- ........................................................................... tion, many cases with disomy/trisomy mosaicism involving chromosomes 13, 18, 21, (as well as X) DEFINITION OF MOSAICISM are believed to be due to somatic loss of The word ‘‘mosaic’’ is defined in standard diction- chromosomes from a trisomic fertilisation by aries as ‘‘derived from the presence of many anaphase lag, resulting in some cells with a 8 different pieces to form a single whole’’. This normal diploid chromosome number. While the definition evokes the flat designs and pictures that latter type of chromosomal mosaicism could be were constructed in antiquity using many small considered as a type of reversion to normal, such pieces of differently coloured and shaped tiles or gross changes (involving special mechanisms of similar objects to form a single whole design. In chromosomal replication and sorting) do not fall this sense, the normal body can be considered to be into the type of mosaicism due to reversion that http://jmg.bmj.com/ a three-dimensional mosaic of cells that differ is the scope of this review. developmentally and structurally but yield an However, the initial steps in the discovery and overall ‘‘picture’’ of a single human body and its further studies of chromosomal mosaicism have various organs. Although this interpretation is served as a framework for the study of the listed in table 1, this is not the current sense or additional types of mosaicism currently identi- usage of the word ‘‘mosaicism’’ in biology. fied (table 1). In addition to chromosomal and The word ‘‘mosaicism’’ is relatively new, and mitochondrial mosaicism, these different types on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. first appeared as a scientific term with reference of mosaicism include germ line mosaicism, to the mosaic rod and cone vision of arthropods. somatic mosaicism due to de novo mutation, More recently, ‘‘mosaicism’’ has been used in and somatic mosaicism due to reversion to biology to imply genetic patterning. Genetic normal of inherited mutations. Genetic counsel- mosaicism can currently be defined as the ling is now beginning to consider such mosaic- presence in a single individual of two genetically ism.9 Two of the additional forms of mosaicism distinct populations of cells that differ from each will not be considered here because they are other at the level of DNA sequence but that either not directly heritable or apparently involve derive from a single zygote. One of these mechanisms of embryonic lethality. These are populations is considered to be ‘‘normal’’ while the case of neoplasia where DNA changes occur the second is ‘‘mutant’’ with respect to a in the tumour cells but not in other cells of the particular inherited deleterious alteration in the body, and the somatic mosaicism observed in DNA. While there are several different types of disorders for a condition where the presence of a ....................... genetic mosaicism, this review will focus on the mutation in all cells is embryonically lethal, such more recently documented examples in humans as incontinentia pigmenti in males.10 11 X inacti- Correspondence to: of mosaicism resulting from reversion of inherit- vation can be considered as a form of ‘‘mosai- Professor Hirschhorn, cism’’ but not with respect to DNA sequence, and Medicine, Cell Biology & ed deleterious mutations to normal, and the Pediatrics, New York possible implications of these observations. will only be discussed with reference to the University School of However, a discussion of the various types of significance of skewed X inactivation.12 Medicine, 550 First Ave genetic mosaicism, many of which are listed in Several different observations have served to CD612, New York NY table 1, serves to clarify the differences between raise initially the possible presence of mosaicism 10016, USA; [email protected] these, the parameters that underlie their defini- in individuals with inherited disorders. In vivo, ....................... tion, and the possible mechanisms involved.1–5 apparently unexpected differences in phenotype www.jmedgenet.com 722 Hirschhorn Table 1 Types of mosaicism* J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.40.10.721 on 20 October 2003. Downloaded from Condition DNA Resultant phenotype Normal developmental differences in Nuclear DNA sequence the same Normal different tissues and cell types in all cells (not true mosaicism) Mitochondrial heteroplasmy Nuclear DNA sequence the same Patient normal or abnormal; in all cells, mitochondrial DNA can may lead to abnormal differ from cell to cell due to offspring mutations in the mitochondrial DNA and differential distribution (heteroplasmy) Chromosomal mosaicism Nuclear DNA differs; usually two Patient normal or abnormal; different classes due to varying may lead to abnormal chromosomal complements offspring Germ line mosaicism (resulting from a Nuclear DNA differs; only in germ Patient normal; may lead to de novo mutation in a germ cell) line cells multiple abnormal offspring Somatic mosaicism due to de novo Nuclear DNA differs in different Patient usually abnormal; mutation (+/2 germ line) (resulting tissues and number of cells, disease may be milder than from a de novo mutation at a stage depending on stage and site of expected during embryogenesis) the de novo mutation Somatic mosaicism due to reversion Nuclear DNA differs in different Patient may be abnormal, (resulting from a mutation that corrects tissues and cells, depending on possibly milder than expected (reverts) a deleterious inherited mutation stage and site of the reversion or occasionally normal in some cells) *Does not consider other types such as those found in neoplasms. Chimeric states such as persistence of fetal cells derived from prior pregnancies are not considered as mosaicism as they do not derive from the same zygote. have served as signals suggesting the presence of mosaicism. SOMATIC MOSAICISM DUE TO DE NOVO These signals have included milder than expected disease MUTATIONS phenotypes based upon comparison with the clinical course Somatic mosaicism is most commonly due to a de novo of individuals with the same genotype, improvement rather deleterious mutation during embryogenesis. The effect upon than the expected worsening of disease over time, or a parent phenotype is dependent upon cellular site of the mutation with mild form of a dominant disorder who has offspring and the point during embryogenesis at which it occurs. The who are more severely affected. In vitro, the presence of the phenotype can range from full expression to presence of only functional gene product in some cells and its absence in very mild features and/or lack of progression of disease. The others, or the appearance of both functionally resistant or critical finding indicating that the somatic mosaicism is due ‘‘normal’’ and abnormal cells in tissue culture have also been to a de novo mutation is the failure to find the mutation(s) in reported as indicating possible mosaicism. With the advent of the relevant parents (mother for X linked disorders, one of molecular biology, rapid DNA sequencing and cloning of the parents for autosomal dominant disorders and in both single copies of DNA, it has been possible to document the parents for autosomal recessive disorders). Somatic mosaics http://jmg.bmj.com/ molecular or ‘‘DNA’’ basis for these in vivo and in vitro have been identified most frequently in autosomal dominant observations, suggesting the possible presence of both normal and X linked disorders, both because the pattern of and mutant cells in a single individual. Additionally, the now inheritance allows for easier ascertainment of de novo routine determination of DNA sequence has allowed for mutational events and because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Full Page
    CCR PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SERIES CCR Pediatric Oncology Series Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders Michael F. Walsh1, Vivian Y. Chang2, Wendy K. Kohlmann3, Hamish S. Scott4, Christopher Cunniff5, Franck Bourdeaut6, Jan J. Molenaar7, Christopher C. Porter8, John T. Sandlund9, Sharon E. Plon10, Lisa L. Wang10, and Sharon A. Savage11 Abstract DNA repair syndromes are heterogeneous disorders caused by around the world to discuss and develop cancer surveillance pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins key in DNA guidelines for children with cancer-prone disorders. Herein, replication and/or the cellular response to DNA damage. The we focus on the more common of the rare DNA repair dis- majority of these syndromes are inherited in an autosomal- orders: ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome, Fanconi ane- recessive manner, but autosomal-dominant and X-linked reces- mia, dyskeratosis congenita, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, sive disorders also exist. The clinical features of patients with DNA Rothmund–Thomson syndrome, and Xeroderma pigmento- repair syndromes are highly varied and dependent on the under- sum. Dedicated syndrome registries and a combination of lying genetic cause. Notably, all patients have elevated risks of basic science and clinical research have led to important in- syndrome-associated cancers, and many of these cancers present sights into the underlying biology of these disorders. Given the in childhood. Although it is clear that the risk of cancer is rarity of these disorders, it is recommended that centralized increased, there are limited data defining the true incidence of centers of excellence be involved directly or through consulta- cancer and almost no evidence-based approaches to cancer tion in caring for patients with heritable DNA repair syn- surveillance in patients with DNA repair disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • CCR PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SERIES CCR Pediatric Oncology Series Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions Christopher C
    CCR PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SERIES CCR Pediatric Oncology Series Recommendations for Surveillance for Children with Leukemia-Predisposing Conditions Christopher C. Porter1, Todd E. Druley2, Ayelet Erez3, Roland P. Kuiper4, Kenan Onel5, Joshua D. Schiffman6, Kami Wolfe Schneider7, Sarah R. Scollon8, Hamish S. Scott9, Louise C. Strong10, Michael F. Walsh11, and Kim E. Nichols12 Abstract Leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, has long been patients. The panel recognized that for several conditions, recognized to occasionally run in families. The first clues about routine monitoring with complete blood counts and bone the genetic mechanisms underlying familial leukemia emerged marrow evaluations is essential to identify disease evolution in 1990 when Li-Fraumeni syndrome was linked to TP53 muta- and enable early intervention with allogeneic hematopoietic tions. Since this discovery, many other genes associated with stem cell transplantation. However, for others, less intensive hereditary predisposition to leukemia have been identified. surveillance may be considered. Because few reports describ- Although several of these disorders also predispose individuals ing the efficacy of surveillance exist, the recommendations to solid tumors, certain conditions exist in which individuals are derived by this panel are based on opinion, and local expe- specifically at increased risk to develop myelodysplastic syn- rience and will need to be revised over time. The development drome (MDS) and/or acute leukemia. The increasing identifica- of registries and clinical trials is urgently needed to enhance tion of affected individuals and families has raised questions understanding of the natural history of the leukemia-predis- around the efficacy, timing, and optimal methods of surveil- posing conditions, such that these surveillance recommenda- lance.
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Reference Book
    The Counsyl Foresight™ Carrier Screen 180 Kimball Way | South San Francisco, CA 94080 www.counsyl.com | [email protected] | (888) COUNSYL The Counsyl Foresight Carrier Screen - Disease Reference Book 11-beta-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia .................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 21-hydroxylase-deficient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia ...........................................................................................................................................................................................10 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin Synthase Deficiency ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................12 ABCC8-related Hyperinsulinism........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Alpha Thalassemia.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Genetics Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Panel
    Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Panel Test code: HE0801 Is a 135 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. The genes on this panel are included in the Comprehensive Hematology Panel. About Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are a diverse set of genetic disorders characterized by the inability of the bone marrow to produce sufficient circulating blood cells. Bone marrow failure can affect all blood cell lineages causing clinical symptoms similar to aplastic anemia, or be restricted to one or two blood cell lineages. The clinical presentation may include thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. Hematological manifestations may be accompanied by physical features such as short stature and abnormal skin pigmentation in Fanconi anemia and dystrophic nails, lacy reticular pigmentation and oral leukoplakia in dyskeratosis congenita. Patients with IBMFS have an increased risk of developing cancer—either hematological or solid tumors. Early and correct disease recognition is important for management and surveillance of the diseases. Currently, accurate genetic diagnosis is essential to confirm the clinical diagnosis. The most common phenotypes that are covered by the panel are Fanconi anemia, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and WAS-related disorders. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Panel and their clinical significance
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Photosensitivity Disorders Dr
    FAST FACTS FOR BOARD REVIEW Series Editor: William W. Huang,MD,MPH W. Series Editor:William Swetha N.Pathak,MD;JacquelineDeLuca,MD Pediatric PhotosensitivityDisorders Table 1. Pediatric Photosensitivity Disorders Disease Pathophysiology Clinical Features Management/Prognosis Other/Pearls Actinic prurigo Strong association Pruritic crusted papules Phototesting: lesions Native Americans, (hydroa aestivale, with HLA-DR4 and nodules in both provoked by UVA or UVB; especially mestizos; Hutchinson (HLA-DRB1*0401/0407); sun-exposed and less spontaneous resolution hardening does not summer prurigo) may be a persistent frequently nonexposed may occur during late occur; histopathology: variant of PMLE sites (ie, buttocks); heal adolescence; may follow dermal perivascular (delayed-type with scarring; mucosal a chronic course that mononuclear cell hypersensitivity) and conjunctival persists in adulthood; infiltrate, lacks papillary from UVA or UVB involvement, with cheilitis photoprotection; topical dermal edema, can see often an initial or only corticosteroids and lymphoid follicles feature; worse in summer topical tacrolimus; from lip biopsies; but can extend to winter NB-UVB or PUVA; occurs hours to cyclosporine or days following azathioprine; thalidomide sun exposure (treatment of choice) for (vs solar urticaria) resistant disease noconflictofinterest. The authorsreport Long Beach,California. Center, LaserSkinCare DeLucaisfrom Dr. North Carolina. Winston-Salem, University, Forest Wake Pathakisfrom Dr. Bloom syndrome AR; BLM (encodes Malar telangiectatic
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gene Therapy May Occur in All Patients with Generalized Non-Herlitz Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa with COL17A1 Mutations Anna M.G
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector ORIGINAL ARTICLE Natural Gene Therapy May Occur in All Patients with Generalized Non-Herlitz Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa with COL17A1 Mutations Anna M.G. Pasmooij1, Miranda Nijenhuis1, Renske Brander1 and Marcel F. Jonkman1 Mutations in the type XVII collagen gene (COL17A1) result in the blistering disorder non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB-nH). The incidence of revertant mosaicism, also called ‘‘natural gene therapy’’, was identified in a cohort of 14 patients with JEB-nH caused by COL17A1 mutations in the Netherlands. Five different in vivo reversions, all correcting the germ-line COL17A1 mutation c.2237delG in exon 30, were found in four mosaic JEB-nH patients. The correcting DNA changes involved a wide variety of somatic mutations, from which an indel mutation (c.2228-101_2263 þ 70delins15) and a large deletion of 2,165 base pairs (c.2227 þ 153_2336- 318del) have not been previously observed in patients with revertant mosaicism. Our results show that there is no preference for a repair mechanism. Moreover, revertant mosaicism was confirmed on a DNA level in 6 out of 10 generalized JEB-nH patients. Further, photo-material and clinical history of the other four generalized JEB-nH patients demonstrated that each patient has revertant skin patches. In contrast, revertant mosaicism was not detected in the four localized JEB-nH patients. The fact that so many, if not all, generalized JEB-nH COL17A1 patients have revertant patches offers opportunities for cell therapies in which the patient’s own naturally corrected cells are used as a source.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationwide Survey of Baller‑Gerold Syndrome in Japanese Population
    3222 MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 15: 3222-3224, 2017 Nationwide survey of Baller‑Gerold syndrome in Japanese population HIDEO KANEKO1, RIE IZUMI2, HIROTSUGU ODA3, OSAMU OHARA4, KIYOKO SAMESHIMA5, HIDENORI OHNISHI6, TOSHIYUKI FUKAO6 and MICHINORI FUNATO1 1Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Nagara Medical Center, Gifu 502-8558; 2Niigata Prefecture Hamagumi Medical Rehabilitation Center for Children, Niigata 951-8121; 3Laboratory for Integrative Genomics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (RIKEN‑IMS), Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045; 4Department of Technology Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Chiba 292-0818; 5Division of Medical Genetics, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Gunma 377‑8577; 6Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan Received July 19, 2016; Accepted March 10, 2017 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6408 Abstract. Baller-Gerold syndrome (BGS) is a rare autosomal mutations of the RECQL4 gene causes Rothmund-Thomson genetic disorder characterized by radial aplasia/hypoplasia syndrome (3,4). and craniosynostosis. The causative gene for BGS encodes However, mutations in the RECQL4 gene have been associ- RECQL4, which belongs to the RecQ helicase family. To ated with two other recessive disorders: One is RAPADILINO understand BGS patients in Japan, a nationwide survey was syndrome (OMIM 266280) which is characterized by radial conducted, which identified 2 families and 3 patients affected hypoplasia, patella hypoplasia and arched plate, diarrhoea and by the syndrome. All the three patients showed radial defects dislocated joints, little size and limb malformation, slender and craniosynostosis. In one patient who showed a dislocated nose and normal intelligence (4). The other is Baller-Gerold joint of the hip and flexion contracture of both the elbow syndrome (BGS) (OMIM 218600) characterized by radial joints and wrists at birth, a homozygous large deletion in the aplasia/hypoplasia and craniosynostosis (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Table I. Genodermatoses with Known Gene Defects 92 Pulkkinen
    92 Pulkkinen, Ringpfeil, and Uitto JAM ACAD DERMATOL JULY 2002 Table I. Genodermatoses with known gene defects Reference Disease Mutated gene* Affected protein/function No.† Epidermal fragility disorders DEB COL7A1 Type VII collagen 6 Junctional EB LAMA3, LAMB3, ␣3, ␤3, and ␥2 chains of laminin 5, 6 LAMC2, COL17A1 type XVII collagen EB with pyloric atresia ITGA6, ITGB4 ␣6␤4 Integrin 6 EB with muscular dystrophy PLEC1 Plectin 6 EB simplex KRT5, KRT14 Keratins 5 and 14 46 Ectodermal dysplasia with skin fragility PKP1 Plakophilin 1 47 Hailey-Hailey disease ATP2C1 ATP-dependent calcium transporter 13 Keratinization disorders Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis KRT1, KRT10 Keratins 1 and 10 46 Ichthyosis hystrix KRT1 Keratin 1 48 Epidermolytic PPK KRT9 Keratin 9 46 Nonepidermolytic PPK KRT1, KRT16 Keratins 1 and 16 46 Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens KRT2e Keratin 2e 46 Pachyonychia congenita, types 1 and 2 KRT6a, KRT6b, KRT16, Keratins 6a, 6b, 16, and 17 46 KRT17 White sponge naevus KRT4, KRT13 Keratins 4 and 13 46 X-linked recessive ichthyosis STS Steroid sulfatase 49 Lamellar ichthyosis TGM1 Transglutaminase 1 50 Mutilating keratoderma with ichthyosis LOR Loricrin 10 Vohwinkel’s syndrome GJB2 Connexin 26 12 PPK with deafness GJB2 Connexin 26 12 Erythrokeratodermia variabilis GJB3, GJB4 Connexins 31 and 30.3 12 Darier disease ATP2A2 ATP-dependent calcium 14 transporter Striate PPK DSP, DSG1 Desmoplakin, desmoglein 1 51, 52 Conradi-Hu¨nermann-Happle syndrome EBP Delta 8-delta 7 sterol isomerase 53 (emopamil binding protein) Mal de Meleda ARS SLURP-1
    [Show full text]
  • A Young Diabetic Case with Bloom Syndrome a Case of Dyskeratosis
    J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2015;7(Suppl 2):77-92 A Young Diabetic Case with Bloom Syndrome A Case of Dyskeratosis Congenita Associated with Hypothyroidism and Hypogonadism Nilüfer Özdemir Kutbay1, Banu Şarer Yürekli1, Mehmet Erdoğan1, Şevki Çetinkalp1, Nilüfer Özdemir Kutbay1, Zehra Erdemir2, Özgür Çoğulu2, A. Gökhan Özgen1, Banu Şarer Yürekli1, Emin Karaca3, L. Füsun Saygılı1 Mehmet Erdoğan1, Şevki Çetinkalp1, Gülşen Kandiloğlu4, A. Gökhan Özgen1, 1Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ferda Özkınay3, L. Füsun Saygılı1 Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey 1Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of 2Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey Genetics, İzmir, Turkey 2Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, İzmir, Turkey Bloom syndrome (BS) is a rare autosomal recessive 3Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical disorder characterized by short stature, telangiectasias, Genetics, İzmir, Turkey and a rash on the face triggered by the sun. Other clinical 4Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, features include immune deficiency and predisposition to İzmir, Turkey the development of cancer and diabetes. We present this Dyskeratosis congenital (DC) is a rare multisystemic case as the diabetic BS is rare. disease characterized by skin atrophy, pigmentation, nail Case: A 20-year-old male patient who had diabetes dystrophy, leukoplakia in mucous membrane, bone marrow for 3 years was admitted. The patient had complaints of failure, and tendency to malignancy. We present a rare case rash on sun-exposed parts of the body such as cheeks of DC associated with hypothyroidism and hypogonadism. and arms since he was 2 years old. In his medical history, Case: A 30-year-old male patient was referred to us with he was found to be followed up for growth failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Manifestation of Genodermatoses L
    Journal of Medicine, Radiology, Pathology & Surgery (2017), 4, 22–27 NARRATIVE REVIEW Oral manifestation of genodermatoses L. Kavya, S. Vandana, Swetha Paulose, Vishwanath Rangdhol, W. John Baliah, T. Dhanraj Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Pudhucherry, India Keywords Abstract Genodermatoses, mutation, oral Genodermatoses are inherited dermatological disorders associated with the structure manifestation and functions of skin and its appendages. Several genodermatoses presenting with Correspondence multisystem involvement lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Dermatological Dr. L. Kavya, Department of Oral Medicine and diseases, besides including the skin and its supplements may also involve the oral cavity, Radiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental which deserves special attention considering that they may be the only presenting sign Sciences, Pudhucherry, India. of these disorders. The important aspect to be noted about these disorders is the rarity Phone: +91-9442902745. of the conditions and lack of awareness among the population which are the major E-mail: [email protected] drawbacks in the early diagnosis and prompt management of these diseases. This review intends to outline various genodermatoses with their characteristic oral manifestations. Received: 11 April 2017; Accepted: 15 May 2017 doi: 10.15713/ins.jmrps.97 Introduction hence, it is simplified under three classifications based on its distinct features. Genodermatoses or genetic diseases are a group of inherited According to William et al. 2005:[3] skin disorders with a collection of cutaneous and systemic signs 1. Chromosomal and symptoms. In the oral cavity, a wide spectrum of diseases 2. Single gene occurs due to genetic modifications ranging from developmental 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloom Syndrome
    Bloom syndrome What is Bloom syndrome? Bloom syndrome is an inherited disease characterized by short stature, sun-sensitivity, and increased risk of cancer. Cancer is caused by the instability of DNA during cell division and the inability of the body to repair damaged DNA. Symptoms associated with Bloom syndrome are the result of unrepaired gaps and breaks in the genetic material, which impairs normal cell functions.1 Bloom syndrome is also known as Bloom-Torre-Mackacek syndrome and congenital telangiectatic erythema.2 What are the symptoms of Bloom syndrome and what treatment is available? The symptoms of Bloom syndrome may include:3 • Prenatal and postnatal growth deficiency, which may be the only symptom apparent at birth, and short stature in all stages of life • Feeding difficulties in infancy • Gastrointestinal reflux, which may contribute to repeated lung and ear infections • Red (butterfly-shaped) rash that appears after sun exposure, typically on the face and less often, on the hands, and forearms • Immunodeficiency • Learning problems • Infertility in males and early menopause in females • Serious medical complications that appear at unusually early ages, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus • Increased risk of multiple cancers at an early age (average age of diagnosis 26.6 years, range (<1-49) There is no cure for Bloom syndrome at this time. Lifespan may be shortened, most commonly by cancer, but survival to the teens or 20’s is expected. Preventative management is important, such as avoiding sun exposure and having regular cancer screening from a young age. Treatment focuses on managing symptoms, preventing secondary complications, and surveillance.3 How is Bloom syndrome inherited? Bloom syndrome is an autosomal-recessive disease caused by mutations in the BLM gene.1 An individual who inherits one BLM mutation is a carrier and is not expected to have related health problems.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Repair Disorders
    178 Arch Dis Child 1998;78:178–184 REGULAR REVIEW Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.78.2.178 on 1 February 1998. Downloaded from DNA repair disorders C GeoVrey Woods Over the past 30 years a number of rare DNA Exogenous DNA mutants have been classi- repair disorder phenotypes have been deline- cally divided into ultraviolet irradiation, ionis- ated, for example Bloom’s syndrome, ataxia ing irradiation, and alkylating agents. telangiectasia, and Fanconi’s anaemia. In each Ultraviolet irradiation and alkylating agents phenotype it was hypothesised that the under- can cause a number of specific base changes, as lying defect was an inability to repair a particu- well as cross linking bases together. Ionising lar type of DNA damage. For some of these irradiation is thought to generate the majority disorders this hypothesis was supported by of its mutational load by free radical produc- cytogenetics studies using DNA damaging tion. A wide variety of other DNA damaging agents, these tests defined the so-called chro- agents, both natural and man made, are mosome breakage syndromes. A number of the known, many are used as chemotherapeutic aetiological genes have recently been cloned, agents. confirming that some DNA repair disorder phenotypes can be caused by more than one DNA repair gene and vice versa. This review deals only with The DNA double helix seems to have evolved the more common DNA repair disorders. so that mutations, even as small as individual Rarer entities, such as Rothmund-Thomson base damage, are easily recognised. Such syndrome and dyskeratosis congenita, are recognition is usually by a change to the physi- excluded.
    [Show full text]