DOCSLIB.ORG

AAPOR Program 07.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AAPOR Program 07.Indd American Association for Public Opinion Research 62nd Annual Conference Of Polls and Policy Hyatt Regency Orange County May 17-20, 2007 Anaheim, California 62nd Annual Conference May 17-20, 2007 Hyatt Regency Orange County 11999 Harbor Boulevard • Garden Grove, CA 92840 Phone: 714.750.1234 • Guest Fax: 714.971.1721 • www.hyattoc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS AAPOR Schedule of Events . 3 General Information AAPOR & WAPOR Executive Councils . 47 AAPOR Executive Offi ce Staff . 49 Chapter Presidents . 49 Past Presidents / AAPOR Honorary Life Members . 50 Committees . 51 Awards . 54 Conference Sponsors . 55 Technology & Software Exhibitors . 57 Publishers / Book Exhibitors . 57 Contributors . 58 Conference Abstracts . 63 Index . .175 Ads . 185 Maps . inside back cover / back cover Registration/Information Desk Badges/Tickets The AAPOR registration and information desk is located Name badges are provided for all registered meeting in the Royal Ballroom Foyer. All attendees must check in at attendees, exhibitors, speakers and staff. Badges are the registration desk to pick up their conference program, required to gain admittance to all sessions, social events, name badge, and other meeting materials prior to attending and the exhibit hall. Tickets will be collected at each core sessions or social events. Tickets for admittance to the meals meal function. Be sure to bring your ticket with you to are included in the registration packet. the door for admittance. Registration hours are as follows: Wednesday, May 16 . 12:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Thursday, May 17 . 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 18 . 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Saturday, May 19 . 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. Sunday, May 20 . 8:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. 1 NOTES 2 Schedule of Events 3 NOTES 4 WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007 May 16 Wednesday, AAPOR EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEETING/LUNCH 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Salon 7-8 AAPOR REGISTRATION DESK OPEN 12:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Royal Registration GOLF OUTING 2:00 p.m. Sponsored by RTI International AAPOR SHORT COURSES 2:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. (pre-registration required) Pacifi c Cell Phones and Survey Research – John Hall, Linda B. Piekarski, Mario Callegaro, & Donna Gillin Harbor Propensity Scores – Karol Krotki & Sunghee Lee DESSERT WELCOME RECEPTION 8:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m. Sponsored by NORC Networks Bar Photo courtesy of AOCVCB. 5 THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2007 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. AAPOR REGISTRATION DESK OPEN Royal Registration 8:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. AAPOR SHORT COURSES (pre-registration required) Pacifi c Multimode Data Collection: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation – Martin R. Frankel & Michael W. Link Sponsored by DMS Research Harbor Introduction to Writing Survey Questions – Nora Cate Schaeffer CONCURRENT SESSION A Thursday WHAT’S BEHIND THE VOTE CHOICE? 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Terrace ABC Chair: Christopher Paul Borick, Muhlenberg College Discussant: Michael Butterworth, CBS News Determining the Impact of Iraq on the 2006 Election: Traditional Versus Priming Methods Dan Cassino, Fairleigh Dickinson University Krista Jenkins, Fairleigh Dickinson University Peter Woolley, Fairleigh Dickinson University Campaigning on Controversy: Gay Marriage, Stem Cell Research, and Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election Thursday, May 17 Thursday, Andrew R. Binder, University of Wisconsin-Madison We Know “It” Makes a Difference, but What Is “It”?: An Exploration of Factors Driving Voter Choices and the “Meaning” behind Them Eric W. Rademacher, University of Cincinnati Thursday CELL PHONE SURVEYING: COVERAGE BIAS 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Terrace DEF Chair: Paul J. Lavrakas, Nielsen Media Research Discussant: Audience members The Prevalence of Wireless Substitution and Its Impact on Random-Digit-Dial Health Surveys of Young Adults and Adults in Poverty Stephen J. Blumberg, National Center for Health Statistics Julian V. Luke, National Center for Health Statistics What’s Missing from National RDD Surveys? The Impact of the Growing Cell-Only Population Scott Keeter, Pew Research Center Courtney Kennedy, University of Michigan Trevor Tompson, The Associated Press Mike Mokrzycki, The Associated Press April Clark, Pew Research Center An Assessment of Bias Due to Noncoverage of Wireless-Only Households in RDD Surveys of Households with Young Children Meena Khare, National Center for Health Statistics Sadeq Chowdhury, NORC Kirk Wolter, NORC James A. Singleton, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thursday ISSUES IN MEASURING RACE AND ETHNICITY 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Garden 1-2 Chair: Marla Cralley, Arbitron Discussant: Christian Collet, Doshisha University Response Differences to Implicit and Explicit Race-Matching Patricia A. LeBaron, University of Michigan P. Denise Cobb, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville Cindy Boland-Perez, University of Arkansas-Little Rock 6 Examining the Signifi cance of Racial/Ethnic Designations among Non-U.S. Citizens Vincent E. Welch, NORC Kristy Webber, NORC Thomas B. Hoffer, NORC Brian Lisek, NORC New Immigrants, New Complexities: Measuring Race in Surveys Kate E. Dalton, NORC The Mixed Message: Reliability and Consistency for Race and Ethnicity Data for the Same Individuals from Different Sources and Over Time Iain Noble, Department for Education and Skills (UK) Thursday ASSESSING INTERVIEWER PERFORMANCE 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Garden 3 Chair: Nat Ehrlich, Michigan State University May 17 Thursday, Discussant: Keith Smith, RTI International Evaluating the Performance of Telephone Interviewers Nat Ehrlich, Michigan State University Larry A. Hembroff, Michigan State University Validating Field Interviewers’ Work for Verifi cation, Quality and Confi dentiality Standards Suzanne Bard, NORC Maureen Bonner, NORC A Tool for Monitoring Field Interviewer Work Patterns in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Joe Murphy, RTI International Adam Safi r, RTI International Susan Myers, RTI International Measuring Interviewer Performance: Are We Over-Quantifying? Angela N. Knittle, Franklin & Marshall College Berwood A. Yost, Franklin & Marshall College Jennifer L. Harding, Franklin & Marshall College Thursday INCREASING RESPONSE AND COMPLETION RATES ON THE WEB 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Garden 4 Chair: Paul Schroeder, Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas Discussant: David Jones Roe, RTI International Assessment of Variations in Response Rate to Web-Based Student Surveys Ananda Mitra, Wake Forest University Thomas McCoy, Wake Forest University Heather Champion, Wake Forest University Mary O’Brian, Wake Forest University Mayank Gupta, Wake Forest University Mark Wolfson, Wake Forest University Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Effects of Progress Indicators, Promised Duration, and Questionnaire Length on Completing Web Surveys Ting Yan, University of Michigan Frederick G. Conrad, University of Michigan Roger Tourangeau, University of Maryland Mick P. Couper, University of Michigan Encouraging Web Responses among College Students: An Experiment Julie Ladinsky, Mathematica Policy Research Geraldine Mooney, Mathematica Policy Research Laura Kalb, Mathematica Policy Research Do Tailored Messages of Encouragement Reduce Web Survey Break-offs? Joseph W. Sakshaug, University of Michigan Scott D. Crawford, Survey Sciences Group Karen K. Inkelas, University of Maryland 7 Thursday THE RELIGIOUS FACTOR 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Madrid Chair: Micheline Blum, Blum & Weprin Associates Discussant: Murray Edelman, Rutgers University Examination of Types and Effects of Spiritual Seeking Kumar Rao, Knowledge Networks Dwayne Ball, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ronald Hampton, University of Nebraska-Lincoln The Dynamic Religion Factor in Worldwide Public Life: How Well Does the U.S. State Department Understand Worldwide Societal Attitudes on Religion? Brian J. Grim, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life Roger Finke, Pennsylvania State University Richard Wike, Pew Global Attitudes Project Religious Characteristics of American Muslims Gregory A. Smith, Pew Research Center John C. Green, Pew Research Center Amaney Jamal, Princeton University Daniel A. Cox, Pew Research Center My God’s Better Than Yours: Public Opinion and Religious Affect Jennifer De Pinto, CBS News Monika L. McDermott, University of Connecticut Thursday POLLS, POLITICIANS AND THE PUBLIC Thursday, May 17 Thursday, 8:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Imperial Chair: Robert Eisinger, Lewis and Clark College Discussant: Kathleen A. Frankovic, CBS News Exit Polls and the Interpretation of Election Results Michael W. Traugott, University of Michigan The Foreign Policy Disconnect: Multilateralist Public, Unilateralist Offi cials Benjamin I. Page, University of Chicago Politicians’ Use of Polls: Can’t Trust ‘Em, Can’t Ignore ‘Em David W. Moore, Durham, NH The Second Face of Polling: The Use and Misuse of Polls by Politicians Lawrence R. Jacobs, University of Minnesota REFRESHMENT BREAK Thursday Sponsored by SPSS 9:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Foyer between Royal Ballroom & Terrace Room CONCURRENT SESSION B Thursday THE 2006 ELECTIONS 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Terrace ABC Chair: Michael W. Traugott, University of Michigan Discussant: Charles Franklin, University of Wisconsin-Madison Anatomy of a Political Ad: An Empirical Evaluation of the 2006 Michael J. Fox Stem Cell Research Advertisment Christopher Paul Borick, Muhlenberg College Stem Cell Publics: Issue Involvement in the 2006 Midterm Elections Kajsa E. Dalrymple, University of Wisconsin-Madison Amy B. Becker, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dietram Scheufele, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dominique Brossard, University of Wisconsin-Madison Consumer Confi dence and the 2006 Election Trevor Tompson, The Associated Press Michael
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis of Childhood Resilience and the Politics of Teaching Resilience to "Kids at Risk
    REWRITING RESILIENCE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF CHILDHOOD RESILIENCE AND THE POLITICS OF TEACHING RESILIENCE TO "KIDS AT RISK by SHEILA MARTINEAU BA, The University of Toronto, 1993 "V A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Educational Studies) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1999 © Sheila Martineau, 1999 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Educational Studies The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date: y 11 ABSTRACT HIS STUDY IS A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSE ON CHILDHOOD RESILIENCE and the politics of teaching resilience to "kids at risk" in inner-city schools. Resiliency research is Trooted in the early psychology studies of children's coping and competence. By the 1970s, researchers were observing children who appeared invulnerable to traumatic events. These children were later described as resilient, and resilience was defined as bouncing back from adversity. Today, resilience has become an ideological code for social conformity and academic achievement. My analysis problematizes "childhood resilience" and "teaching resilience" and examines two dangerous shifts in the mainstream resiliency research over the past several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Communication Studies Communication Studies, Department of 11-2013 Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012 Damien S. Pfister University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Jessy J. Ohl University of Mary Washington, [email protected] Marty Nader Nebraska Wesleyan University, [email protected] Dana Griffin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstudiespapers Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Pfister, Damien S.; Ohl, Jessy J.; Nader, Marty; and Griffin,a D na, "Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012" (2013). Papers in Communication Studies. 53. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstudiespapers/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Communication Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Communication Studies 64:5 (November-December 2013; Special Issue: Consistency and Change in Political Campaign Communication: Ana- lyzing the 2012 Elections), pages 488-507; doi: 10.1080/10510974.2013.832340 Copyright © 2013 Central States Communication Association; published by Tay- digitalcommons.unl.edu lor & Francis Group. Used by permission. Published online October 18, 2013. Lakoff’s Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012 Jessy J. Ohl,1 Damien S. Pfister,1 Martin Nader,2 and Dana Griffin 1 Department of Communication Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2 Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Corresponding author — Jessy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology in the Age of Mediatised Politics: from 'Belief Systems'
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Angelos Kissas Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: from ‘belief systems’ to the re- contextualizing principle of discourse Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Kissas, Angelos (2017) Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: from ‘belief systems’ to the re- contextualizing principle of discourse. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22 (2). pp. 197-215. ISSN 1356-9317 DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2017.1306958 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/76952/ Available in LSE Research Online: May 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 1 Ideology in the age of mediatised politics: From ‘belief systems’ to the re-contextualizing principle of discourse Angelos Kissas, Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science [email protected] To cite this article: Kissas, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Parenting and Politics: Exploring Early Moral Bases of Political Orientation
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports Parenting and Politics: Exploring Early Moral Bases of Political Orientation Ronnie Janoff-Bulman* a, Nate C. Carnes a, Sana Sheikh b [a] Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. [b] School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK. Abstract Based on Lakoff’s (2002) Strict Father and Nurturant Parent metaphors for political conservatism and liberalism respectively, two studies explored parenting styles, political ideology, and the moral orientations that might link the two. Restrictive parenting (by both mother and father) predicted political conservatism, and this path was mediated by a strong Social Order orientation (Study 1) reflecting, more broadly, an inhibition-based proscriptive morality (Study 2). Political liberalism was associated with a Social Justice orientation, but was not predicted by nurturant parenting in either study. Study 1 included mothers’ reports of their own parenting, and these were correlated with the students’ responses. Findings support a restrictive moral underpinning for conservatism, but raise questions about the assumed unique association between parental nurturance and political liberalism, which is addressed in the discussion. Keywords: parenting, politics, morality, liberal, conservative Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2014, Vol. 2(1), 43±60, doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.243 Received: 2013-07-31. Accepted: 2014-03-07. Published (VoR): 2014-03-21. Handling Editor: Johanna Ray Vollhardt, Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA *Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003. E-mail: [email protected] This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilevel Governance and Development
    Multilevel Governance and Development Ryan Wilson The Myth of Political Reason - The Moral and Emotional Foundations of Political Cognition and US Politics SRE-Discussion-2019/02 2019 1 The Myth of Political Reason The Moral and Emotional Foundations of Political Cognition and US Politics Ryan Wilson Master Thesis Socio-Ecological Economics and Policy 2018 2 Abstract The current ascendancy of right-wing populists across western democracies is a concerning trend, and so far, the left has not managed to mount an effective counterstrategy to arrest its momentum. Much of the rhetoric of these right-wing populists has focused on evoking fear and suspicion, verging on hatred, of outsiders and fellow countrymen and women with opposing political ideologies, to great effect. The importance of understanding why certain rhetoric is effective cannot be understated, and the works of George Lakoff, Jonathan Haidt, and Drew Westen that illuminate the moral and emotional factors behind how individuals interpret and respond to inputs of a political nature are reviewed and synthesised. Individuals’ underlying moral mental structures and the emotional responses that they can trigger must be understood in order to generate political messaging that resonates strongly with its target audience and consequently increases the likelihood of their actuation to vote. The recent phenomenon of individualisation, stemming from the current era of reflexive modernity is analysed within the context of divergent conservative and liberal moral matrices, and is found to be disproportionately ailing the liberal side of politics. In delineating the key elements of liberal and conservative morality, the existence of liberal moral tenets that are discordant with longstanding liberal communitarian ideals were revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation Under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models Divide US Politics
    A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics By Eva Elisabeth Wehling A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Professor Eve Sweetser Professor Thomas Shannon Spring 2013 Abstract A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics by Eva Elisabeth Wehling Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Across the globe and throughout history, politics are regularly divided into “left-leaning” and “right-leaning” camps. Explaining the sources of this conservative-liberal divide has become a major quest in the cognitive and social sciences. Early attempts have focused on self- interest as a possible explanation. However, as the self-interest hypothesis repeatedly failed, researchers’ belief in its explanatory power dwindled. Recent investigations have thus begun to tap into genetic material, personality traits, psychological needs, and moral concerns as possible explanations. One early account of the moral underpinnings that guide conservative and liberal politics is Moral Politics Theory (Lakoff, 1996). It proposes that conservatives and liberals endorse different moral worldviews, which conceptually unify their positions on issues as diverse as abortion, education, the economy, or the environment. Those worldviews are grounded in different beliefs about ideal parenting: conservatives endorse a strict-father and liberals a nurturant-parent model. The theory proposes that parenting beliefs are mapped onto national politics via the NATION AS FAMILY metaphor, and that language use in synch with the two models can significantly influence people’s perception of political issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio 314 Animal Behv Bio314new
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: BIO 314: COURSE TITLE: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR xii i BIO 314: ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR Course Writers/Developers Miss Olakolu Fisayo Christie Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, No 3 Wilmot Point Road, Bar-beach Bus-stop, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria. Course Editor: Dr. Adesina Adefunke Ministry of Health, Alausa. Lagos NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA xii i BIO 314 COURSE GUIDE Introduction Animal Behaviour (314) is a second semester course. It is a two credit units compustory course which all students offering Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Biology must take. This course deals with the theories and principles of adaptive behaviour and evolution of animals. The course contents are history of ethology. Reflex and complex behaviour. Orientation and taxes. Fixed action patterns, releasers, motivation and driver. Displays, displacement activities and conflict behaviour. Learning communication and social behaviour. The social behaviour of primates. Hierarchical organization. The physiology of behaviour. Habitat selection, homing and navigation. Courtship and parenthood. Biological clocks. What you will learn in this course In this course, you have the course units and a course guide. The course guide will tell you briefly what the course is all about. It is a general overview of the course materials you will be using and how to use those materials. It also helps you to allocate the appropriate time to each unit so that you can successfully complete the course within the stipulated time limit. The course guide also helps you to know how to go about your Tutor-Marked-Assignment which will form part of your overall assessment at the end of the course.
    [Show full text]
  • MINDSCAPES MINDSCAPES More INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> the MIND in ACTION> MINDSCAPES
    INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> THE MIND IN ACTION> MINDSCAPES MINDSCAPES more Caption TIME INC INDEX CONTENTS THEMES GO BACK JOTTER Help KNOWHOW> THE MIND IN ACTION> MINDSCAPES How can mind know mind? Even though, as the quotation opposite suggests, mind is ulti- mately out of reach, throughout history, and especially in recent years, there have been strenuous attempts both to understand how the mind works and to make maps of it. If ‘mind’ were only an obscure academic, scientific, or I continue with five more detailed presentations of religious notion, then it might not matter much, but the current mindscapes. evolving knowledge about mind continues to affect and Introduction shape action in the world and is often used to legitimize Schore: Attachment power and authority—what are, or are not, the legitimate Damasio: The biology of consciousness contents of mind? Who is, for example, ‘not in their right Lakoff: Embodied metaphor mind’? Or what is, or is not, a ‘healthy mind’? Mind matters, Heron: Psyche and personhood as for example, Salman Rushdie found with Satanic Verses, Gazzaniga: Mind and evolution and the millions of people in the UK and elsewhere who use anti-depressants know only too well. I end with a Critical review of these five models. This section gathers together several early mindscapes. Vedanta Psyche Aristotle Boethius Roman Christian Reformation They are followed by several modern mindscapes Descartes Newton As a sword Telephone exchange cannot cut Computers itself, or as a Holograms finger can- Freud not touch its Complexity Theory more own tip, Mind cannot more see itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Portrayals of Latin American Immigrants in the 2016 Election
    PINEDA 1 Yessica Pineda PSC 393 Professor May March 1, 2020 Trump’s Portrayals of Latin American Immigrants in the 2016 Election The 2016 Election in the United States was seen to be drastically different from any past elections simply due to the fact that for the first time in history, one of the candidates did not have any experience within the political field. The Republican candidate, Donald Trump, was nothing more than a businessman and television personality before he was elected as the forty- fifth president of the United States in 2016. One of the biggest aspects of his overall campaign was the creation of a said wall along the Southern border to decrease and possibly put an end to mass incoming immigration from Mexico. Through his use of language, President Trump portrayed the Mexican immigrants to be a sort of plague that the United States had to immediately get rid of. Due to this proposed policy, President Trump received mass votes which won him the election. Although this seems to be quite irrational, when analyzed through George Lakoff’s, Moral Politics, it begins to make sense. In George Lakoff’s, Moral Politics, Lakoff pursues to articulate the cognitive linguistics framework through his theory of metaphor. According to Lakoff, “ One of the most fundamental results in cognitive science…most of our thought is unconscious…In recent years my work has centered on two components of conceptual systems: conceptual metaphors and categories” (Lakoff, 4). Through this statement, it can be seen that PINEDA 2 Lakoff’s theory of metaphor revolves around the fact that individuals tend to think in metaphor form unconsciously.
    [Show full text]
  • ROGERS, DAVID MICHAEL, Ph.D. Bodies of Executive Citizenship: Embodied Rhetorical Performances of the Presidency from Reagan to Obama
    ROGERS, DAVID MICHAEL, Ph.D. Bodies of Executive Citizenship: Embodied Rhetorical Performances of the Presidency from Reagan to Obama. (2012) Directed by Hephzibah Roskelly. 203 pp. This dissertation contributes to the recent resurgence of scholarship devoted to the American presidency by arguing that the role of the presidential body works as a singularly significant crucial point for notions of citizenship and national identity. Addressing presidential bodies as texts shows that the singularity of the presidential body positions it as a dense site of affect and identification that allows for leadership and the organization of politics to work through the management of emotions. In particular, the emergence of television allows presidents to embody sovereign power in ways that both sentimentalize it and separate the performance of singular, model citizenship from populations more or less abandoned as not-quite-national subjects. By exploring how media imagine the chief executive and how presidents represent themselves on television, in speeches, and in campaign documentaries, I identify national scripts that constitute executive citizenship, a concept I develop and see as crucial to the management of public and private life. By highlighting the fundamental role executive performances play in constructing an image of national citizenship and shaping feelings of belonging, I challenge traditional narratives that figure citizenship in the U.S. as natural rather than deliberately constructed through rhetoric and language. BODIES OF EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title A Nation Under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models Divide US Politics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4jt0p1hw Author Wehling, Eva Elisabeth Publication Date 2013 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics By Eva Elisabeth Wehling A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Professor Eve Sweetser Professor Thomas Shannon Spring 2013 Abstract A Nation under Joint Custody: How Conflicting Family Models divide US Politics by Eva Elisabeth Wehling Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor George Lakoff, Co-chair Professor Terry Regier, Co-chair Across the globe and throughout history, politics are regularly divided into “left-leaning” and “right-leaning” camps. Explaining the sources of this conservative-liberal divide has become a major quest in the cognitive and social sciences. Early attempts have focused on self- interest as a possible explanation. However, as the self-interest hypothesis repeatedly failed, researchers’ belief in its explanatory power dwindled. Recent investigations have thus begun to tap into genetic material, personality traits, psychological needs, and moral concerns as possible explanations. One early account of the moral underpinnings that guide conservative and liberal politics is Moral Politics Theory (Lakoff, 1996). It proposes that conservatives and liberals endorse different moral worldviews, which conceptually unify their positions on issues as diverse as abortion, education, the economy, or the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs of Dispositionism: the Premature Demise of Situationist Law and Economics, 64 Md
    Maryland Law Review Volume 64 | Issue 1 Article 6 The oC sts of Dispositionism: the Premature Demise of Situationist Law and Economics Adam Benforado Jim Hanson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Adam Benforado, & Jim Hanson, The Costs of Dispositionism: the Premature Demise of Situationist Law and Economics, 64 Md. L. Rev. 24 (2005) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol64/iss1/6 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE COSTS OF DISPOSITIONISM: THE PREMATURE DEMISE OF SITUATIONIST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADAM BENFORADO* & JON HANSON** I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 25 A. Critical Realism and the Dispositionist Spectrum ......... 28 B. The Connection Between Conservatism and Dispositionism ....................................... 31 1. Close Ties ....................................... 31 2. The Enigma of Richard Posner .................... 32 II. LAW AND ECONOMICS: SITUATIONIST CALABRESI VERSUS DISPOSITIONIST POSNER ...................................... 34 A. ContrastingPosner's and Calabresi'sAttributional Perspectives .......................................... 35 1. M odel Actor...................................... 36 a. Posner......................................
    [Show full text]