DOCSLIB.ORG

Interplay Between Neutrophils, Nets and T-Cells in SARS-Cov-2 Infection—A Missing Piece of the Puzzle in the COVID-19 Pathogenesis?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interplay Between Neutrophils, Nets and T-Cells in SARS-Cov-2 Infection—A Missing Piece of the Puzzle in the COVID-19 Pathogenesis? cells Review Interplay between Neutrophils, NETs and T-Cells in SARS-CoV-2 Infection—A Missing Piece of the Puzzle in the COVID-19 Pathogenesis? Paulina Nied´zwiedzka-Rystwej 1,* , Ewelina Grywalska 2 , Rafał Hrynkiewicz 1 , Dominika B˛ebnowska 1 , Mikołaj Woł ˛acewicz 3 , Adam Majchrzak 4 and Miłosz Parczewski 5 1 Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (D.B.) 2 Department of Clinical Immunology and Immunotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Warsaw, 02-096 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Independent Public Regional Hospital in Szczecin, 71-455 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] 5 Department of Infectious, Tropical Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-455 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Citation: Nied´zwiedzka-Rystwej, P.; Abstract: Since the end of 2019, a new, dangerous virus has caused the deaths of more than 3 million Grywalska, E.; Hrynkiewicz, R.; people. Efforts to fight the disease remain multifaceted and include prophylactic strategies (vaccines), B˛ebnowska,D.; Woł ˛acewicz,M.; the development of antiviral drugs targeting replication, and the mitigation of the damage associated Majchrzak, A.; Parczewski, M. with exacerbated immune responses (e.g., interleukin-6-receptor inhibitors). However, numerous Interplay between Neutrophils, NETs uncertainties remain, making it difficult to lower the mortality rate, especially among critically ill and T-Cells in SARS-CoV-2 patients. While looking for a new means of understanding the pathomechanisms of the disease, we Infection—A Missing Piece of the asked a question—is our immunity key to resolving these uncertainties? In this review, we attempt to Puzzle in the COVID-19 answer this question, and summarize, interpret, and discuss the available knowledge concerning the Pathogenesis? Cells 2021, 10, 1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ interplay between neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and T-cells in COVID-19. These cells10071817 are considered to be the first line of defense against pathogens and, thus, we chose to emphasize their role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although immunologic alterations are the subject of constant Academic Editors: Isabella Quinti research, they are poorly understood and often underestimated. This review provides background and Alessandro Poggi information for the expansion of research on the novel, immunity-oriented approach to diagnostic and treatment possibilities. Received: 15 May 2021 Accepted: 16 July 2021 Keywords: COVID-19; immunity; SARS-CoV-2; NET; neutrophil; T cells Published: 19 July 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in 1. Introduction published maps and institutional affil- At the end of 2019, the world unexpectedly faced a new challenge related to the iations. appearance of the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2), the agent causing the current coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) [1]. Previously identified coronaviruses, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Middle East Coronavirus), have been histori- cally responsible for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is characterized by Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. widespread inflammation in the lungs as a result of an abnormal inflammatory response Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. to viral infection [2]. However, outbreaks of these two CoVs have been limited in size This article is an open access article and, despite significant mortality, have largely been contained [3]. Therefore, despite the distributed under the terms and fact that SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV posed a significant threat to public health, albeit with conditions of the Creative Commons limited impact, SARS-CoV-2 appears to be the most dangerous pandemic faced in the Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ modern era. 4.0/). Cells 2021, 10, 1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071817 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cells Cells 2021, 10, 1817 2 of 19 The key elements to combat such a deadly phenomenon as the COVID-19 pandemic are quick diagnosis of the infection, effective treatment methods and, in particular, the implementation of safe and effective preventive measures. These measures include frequent washing and disinfecting of hands, wearing face masks, covering the mouth and nose when sneezing, maintaining social distancing, avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated spaces, frequent disinfection of rooms and everyday appliances, and preventive vaccinations [4]. However, the aim of vaccination is not only to protect the vaccinated people, but also to allow the acquisition of herd immunity and significantly reduce the transmission of the virus. This will result in minimizing the number of patients and extinguishing the pandemic. Understanding the pathogenesis of COVID-19, in addition to the importance of the immune system responses to the disease, are essential elements in research on developing and improving the above-mentioned factors in the fight against pandemics in practice. The role of the immune system in SARS-CoV-2 infection is described by many authors [2,3,5,6] and most reviews focus on similar elements. In contrast, the current review emphasizes the rarely described elements of the immune system that may be incorporated in COVID-19 pathogenesis. It is widely known that the presentation of viral antigens to T and B cells takes place via the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on antigen presenting cells (APCs) and thus activates the mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity. It was reported that SARS- CoV-2 acts as an antagonist against type I interferons, which inhibits innate mechanisms [7]. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 down-regulates MHC class I and II molecules, which affects the impairment of the immune response with the participation of T lymphocytes [5]. Then, as the disease progresses, the number of lymphocytes decreases with uncontrolled release of inflammatory cytokines—a cytokine storm [8]. This phenomenon is the main cause of ARDS, causing lung damage and multiple organ failure [9]. In this paper, we wish to highlight elements of the immune system that are less frequently mentioned in the context of COVID-19, which we believe may be key to a better understanding of the concept of immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this context, the role of neutrophils, which constitute an important element of innate immunity, as one of the elements of the first line of defense against microbes, remains underestimated by many authors. In addition to their ability to phagocytose, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), in which nuclear fragments and granules are actively released, is significant [9]. The role of these cells is even more important, as altered neutrophil numbers are recorded in the pathophysiol- ogy of the severe course of COVID-19 [10]. The significant role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 has also been described [11,12]. Feng et al. [13] reported that CD169+ macrophages in the spleen and lymph nodes can contribute to virus replication and spread. Moreover, a cytokine storm is a characteristic feature of the macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), i.e., massive macrophage activation, which plays a major role in ARDS [14]. In MAS, the innate immune response and IL-18 affect cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), and influence their interaction with antigen presenting cells (APCs) and their permeation with macrophages. Increased innate immune response and insufficient cytolytic removal of activated cells results in permanent production of inflammatory mediators, enhanced CTL-APC interaction, and a cytokine storm [11]. The pathogenesis of ARDS indicates the participation of pulmonary alveolar (AM) and interstitial (IM) macrophages, and the course of the disease is influenced by the time and degree of macrophage polarization. Zhang et al. described [15] that the cytokine storm in the severe course of SARS-CoV-2 in- fection begins in the lungs and is associated with an increased number of pro-inflammatory macrophages and the occurrence of pyroptosis in lung tissue, which promotes the release of a large number of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In patients with a severe course of COVID-19, in addition to hypercytokinemia, high levels of ferritin, CRP, and D-dimer were also recorded, which indicated the development of severe MAS inflammation and fibrinolysis [16]. Clinical trials describing the involvement of macrophages in ARDS have been conducted. In their research, Huang et al. [17] conducted an analysis of patients with severe COVID-19, which showed that the number of activated monocytes/macrophages Cells 2021, 10, 1817 3 of 19 was significantly increased, despite the fact that blood counts showed normal values of these cells. In turn, Zhou et al. [18] showed that in patients with ARDS, the number of CD16+ monocytes, including the non-classical CD14+ CD16++ population and the CD14++ CD16+ pro-inflammatory intermediate, was significantly increased. Moreover, the rela- tive number of CD14++ CD16+ monocytes comprised up to 45% of all monocytes. By comparison, other studies by Niles et al. [19] showed that myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs), and neither M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages nor M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IFM Innate Immunity Infographic
    UNDERSTANDING INNATE IMMUNITY INTRODUCTION The immune system is comprised of two arms that work together to protect the body – the innate and adaptive immune systems. INNATE ADAPTIVE γδ T Cell Dendritic B Cell Cell Macrophage Antibodies Natural Killer Lymphocites Neutrophil T Cell CD4+ CD8+ T Cell T Cell TIME 6 hours 12 hours 1 week INNATE IMMUNITY ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Innate immunity is the body’s first The adaptive, or acquired, immune line of immunological response system is activated when the innate and reacts quickly to anything that immune system is not able to fully should not be present. address a threat, but responses are slow, taking up to a week to fully respond. Pathogen evades the innate Dendritic immune system T Cell Cell Through antigen Pathogen presentation, the dendritic cell informs T cells of the pathogen, which informs Macrophage B cells B Cell B cells create antibodies against the pathogen Macrophages engulf and destroy Antibodies label invading pathogens pathogens for destruction Scientists estimate innate immunity comprises approximately: The adaptive immune system develops of the immune memory of pathogen exposures, so that 80% system B and T cells can respond quickly to eliminate repeat invaders. IMMUNE SYSTEM AND DISEASE If the immune system consistently under-responds or over-responds, serious diseases can result. CANCER INFLAMMATION Innate system is TOO ACTIVE Innate system NOT ACTIVE ENOUGH Cancers grow and spread when tumor Certain diseases trigger the innate cells evade detection by the immune immune system to unnecessarily system. The innate immune system is respond and cause excessive inflammation. responsible for detecting cancer cells and This type of chronic inflammation is signaling to the adaptive immune system associated with autoimmune and for the destruction of the cancer cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion of Natural Killer Cells and Innate Immunity
    Discussion of natural killer cells and innate immunity Theresa L. Whiteside, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Myths in tumor immunology • Cancer cells are ignored by the immune system • Immune responses are directed only against “unique” antigens expressed on tumor cells • Tumor-specific T cells alone are sufficient for tumor regression • Tumor are passive targets for anti-tumor responses Tumor/Immune Cells Interactions Tumor cell death C G DC M TUMOR NK Th B Tc Ab Ag Ag/Ab complex NK cells as anti-tumor effectors • LGL, no TCR, express FcγRIII, other activating receptors and KIRs • Spare normal cells but kill a broad range of tumor cells ex vivo by at least two different mechanisms • Produce a number of cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α) • Constitutively express IL-2Rβγ and rapidly respond to IL-2 and also to IL-15 and IFNα/β • Regulated by a balance of inhibitory receptors specific for MHC class I antigens and activating signals • NK-DC interactions at sites of inflammation Heterogeneity of human NK cells • Every NK cell expresses at least one KIR that recognizes a self MHC class I molecule • Two functionally distinct subsets: 1) 90% CD56dimCD16bright , highly cytotoxic, abundant KIR expression, few cytokines 2) 10% CD56brightCD16dim/neg, produce cytokines, poorly cytotoxic, low KIR expression Expression of activating and inhibitory receptors on NK cells Interaction with CD56 Interaction with MHC ligands non-MHC ligands KIR CD16 CD2 CD94/NKG2A/B β2 NKp46, 44, 30 CD94/NKG2C/E NK Cell 2B4 NKG2D Lair1 LIR/ILT A
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Tdetect Fact Sheet for Recipient
    FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS Coronavirus Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation September 2, 2021 Disease 2019 T-Detect COVID Test (COVID-19) You are being given this Fact Sheet because your coughing, difficulty breathing, etc.). A full list of sample is being tested or was tested for an adaptive T- symptoms of COVID-19 can be found at the following cell immune response to the virus that causes link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) using the T- ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html. Detect COVID Test. How are people tested for COVID-19? Two main kinds of tests are currently available for You should not interpret the results of this COVID-19: diagnostic tests and adaptive immune response tests. test to indicate the presence or absence of immunity or protection from COVID-19 • A diagnostic test tells you if you have a current infection. infection. • An adaptive immune response test tells you if you may have had a previous infection This Fact Sheet contains information to help you understand the risks and benefits of using this test to What is the T-Detect COVID Test? evaluate your adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV- This test is similar to an antibody test in that it measures 2, the virus that causes COVID-19. After reading this your adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2, the Fact Sheet, if you have questions or would like to virus that causes COVID-19. However in this case it discuss the information provided, please talk to your specifically measures your adaptive T-cell immune healthcare provider.
    [Show full text]
  • Endothelial-Protective Effects of a G-Protein-Biased Sphingosine-1 Phosphate Receptor-1 Agonist, SAR247799, in Type-2 Diabetes R
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.20103101; this version posted May 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Endothelial-protective effects of a G-protein-biased sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor-1 agonist, SAR247799, in type-2 diabetes rats and a randomized placebo-controlled patient trial. Luc Bergougnan1, Grit Andersen2, Leona Plum-Mörschel3, Maria Francesca Evaristi1, Bruno Poirier1, Agnes Tardat4, Marcel Ermer3, Theresa Herbrand2, Jorge Arrubla2, Hans Veit Coester2, Roberto Sansone5, Christian Heiss6, Olivier Vitse4, Fabrice Hurbin4, Rania Boiron1, Xavier Benain4, David Radzik1, Philip Janiak1, Anthony J Muslin7, Lionel Hovsepian1, Stephane Kirkesseli1, Paul Deutsch8, Ashfaq A Parkar8 1 Sanofi R&D, 1 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91385 Chilly Mazarin, France; 2 Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Hellersbergstraße 9, 41460 Neuss, Germany; 3 Profil Mainz GmbH & Co. KG, Malakoff-Passage, Rheinstraße 4C, Eingang via Templerstraße, D-55116 Mainz, Germany; 4 Sanofi R&D, 371 Rue du Professeur Blayac, 34080 Montpellier, France; 5 University Hospital Düsseldorf, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonary diseases and Vascular medicine, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; 6 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK; 7 Sanofi US Services, 640 Memorial Drive, Cambridge MA 02139, USA; 8 Sanofi US Services, 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA. The authors confirm that the Principal Investigators for the clinical study were Grit Anderson and Leona Plum- Mörschel and that they had direct clinical responsibility for patients at the Neuss and Mainz sites, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Natural Immunity
    COVID-19 natural immunity Scientific brief 10 May 2021 Key Messages: • Within 4 weeks following infection, 90-99% of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus develop detectable neutralizing antibodies. • The strength and duration of the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are not completely understood and currently available data suggests that it varies by age and the severity of symptoms. Available scientific data suggests that in most people immune responses remain robust and protective against reinfection for at least 6-8 months after infection (the longest follow up with strong scientific evidence is currently approximately 8 months). • Some variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses with key changes in the spike protein have a reduced susceptibility to neutralization by antibodies in the blood. While neutralizing antibodies mainly target the spike protein, cellular immunity elicited by natural infection also target other viral proteins, which tend to be more conserved across variants than the spike protein. The ability of emerging virus variants (variants of interest and variants of concern) to evade immune responses is under investigation by researchers around the world. • There are many available serologic assays that measure the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, but at the present time, the correlates of protection are not well understood. Objective of the scientific brief This scientific brief replaces the WHO Scientific Brief entitled “’Immunity passports’ in the context of COVID-19”, published 24 April 2020.1 This update is focused on what is currently understood about SARS-CoV-2 immunity from natural infection. More information about considerations on vaccine certificates or “passports”will be covered in an update of WHO interim guidance, as requested by the COVID-19 emergency committee.2 Methods A rapid review on the subject was undertaken and scientific journals were regularly screened for articles on COVID-19 immunity to ensure to include all large and robust studies available in the literature at the time of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Immune Systems
    Immunology 101 (for the Non-Immunologist) Abhinav Deol, MD Assistant Professor of Oncology Wayne State University/ Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit MI Presentation originally prepared and presented by Stephen Shiao MD, PhD Department of Radiation Oncology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Disclosures Bristol-Myers Squibb – Contracted Research What is the immune system? A network of proteins, cells, tissues and organs all coordinated for one purpose: to defend one organism from another It is an infinitely adaptable system to combat the complex and endless variety of pathogens it must address Outline Structure of the immune system Anatomy of an immune response Role of the immune system in disease: infection, cancer and autoimmunity Organs of the Immune System Major organs of the immune system 1. Bone marrow – production of immune cells 2. Thymus – education of immune cells 3. Lymph Nodes – where an immune response is produced 4. Spleen – dual role for immune responses (especially antibody production) and cell recycling Origins of the Immune System B-Cell B-Cell Self-Renewing Common Progenitor Natural Killer Lymphoid Cell Progenitor Thymic T-Cell Selection Hematopoetic T-Cell Stem Cell Progenitor Dendritic Cell Myeloid Progenitor Granulocyte/M Macrophage onocyte Progenitor The Immune Response: The Art of War “Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.” -Sun Tzu, The Art of War Immunity: Two Systems and Their Key Players Adaptive Immunity Innate Immunity Dendritic cells (DC) B cells Phagocytes (Macrophages, Neutrophils) Natural Killer (NK) Cells T cells Dendritic Cells: “Commanders-in-Chief” • Function: Serve as the gateway between the innate and adaptive immune systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress and the Immune System Tracy B
    4 World Health • 47th Yeor, No. 2, Morch-Aprill994 Stress and the immune system Tracy B. Herbert any people have the effects of factors as diverse as experienced the examinations, bereavement, divorce, Mconnection between stress unemployment, mental arithmetic, and getting sick. Colds, influenza, and looking after a relative with herpes and allergies seem worse Alzheimer's di sease. In general, when we are severely stressed at these studies find that stress is work or in the home. Others are related to changes in both the never sick until they go on vacation numbers of white blood cells in (that is, after the stress is over), and circulation and the quantity of then they spend the whole time antibody in the blood. Moreover, fighting the virus. Because of stress is associated with changes in intrinsic connections like these, the functioning of immune cells. many researchers are today That is, there is a relatively large exploring whether (and how) stress decrease in both lymphocyte and illness are actually linked. One proliferation and natural killer cell specific focus of this research is to activity in individuals who have study the effects of stress on the experienced stress. There seems to immune systems; after all, if stress A lymphocyte: stress may weaken the capacity be some connection between the affects immunity, that would be one of lymphocytes to combat infection. duration of the stress and the amount way in which stress could contribute of immune change. For example, the to illness. longer the stress, the greater the The function of the immune proliferation"- by incubating these decrease in the number of specific system is to protect us from cells for several days with types of white blood cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Effects of Mineralocorticoid and Angiotensin II on Incentive and Mesolimbic Activity Laura A
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Psychology Faculty Research and Scholarship Psychology 2016 Differential effects of mineralocorticoid and angiotensin II on incentive and mesolimbic activity Laura A. Grafe Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Loretta M. Flanagan-Cato Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/psych_pubs Part of the Psychology Commons Custom Citation Grafe, Laura A. and Loretta M. Flanagan-Cato. 2016. "Differential effects of mineralocorticoid and angiotensin II on incentive and mesolimbic activity." Hormones and Behavior 79: 28–36. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/psych_pubs/71 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 2 DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF MINERALOCORTICOID 3 AND ANGIOTENSIN II ON INCENTIVE AND MESOLIMBIC ACTIVITY 4 5 Laura A. Grafea and Loretta M. Flanagan-Catoa,b,c 6 7 Neuroscience Graduate Groupa, Department of Psychologyb, and the Mahoney Institute of 8 Neurological Sciencesc, University of Pennsylvania, 9 Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA 10 11 Abbreviated title: Aldo and AngII-induced motivation for sodium 12 13 14 Corresponding Author: 15 L.M. Flanagan-Cato 16 [email protected] 17 3720 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 18 19 Laura A. Grafe co-designed the research, executed the experiments, analyzed the data, and co- 20 wrote the paper. Loretta M. Flanagan-Cato co-designed research, analyzed the data, and co- 21 wrote the paper. 22 23 ABSTRACT 24 The controls of thirst and sodium appetite are mediated in part by the hormones 25 aldosterone and angiotensin II (AngII).
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Induction of Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Guides Coordinated Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-Cov-2 Mrna Vaccination
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.440862; this version posted April 22, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Rapid induction of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells guides coordinated humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination Authors: Mark M. Painter1,2, †, Divij Mathew1,2, †, Rishi R. Goel1,2, †, Sokratis A. Apostolidis1,2,3, †, Ajinkya Pattekar2, Oliva Kuthuru1, Amy E. Baxter1, Ramin S. Herati4, Derek A. Oldridge1,5, Sigrid Gouma6, Philip Hicks6, Sarah Dysinger6, Kendall A. Lundgreen6, Leticia Kuri-Cervantes1,6, Sharon Adamski2, Amanda Hicks2, Scott Korte2, Josephine R. Giles1,7,8, Madison E. Weirick6, Christopher M. McAllister6, Jeanette Dougherty1, Sherea Long1, Kurt D’Andrea1, Jacob T. Hamilton2,6, Michael R. Betts1,6, Paul Bates6, Scott E. Hensley6, Alba Grifoni9, Daniela Weiskopf9, Alessandro Sette9, Allison R. Greenplate1,2, E. John Wherry1,2,7,8,* Affiliations 1 Institute for Immunology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2 Immune Health™, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 3 Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 4 NYU Langone Vaccine Center, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 5 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Complement System
    Understanding the Complement System WHAT IS THE IMMUNE SYSTEM? The immune system is a complex network of organs, cells and proteins which work together to protect the body against infection and disease. WHAT IS THE COMPLEMENT SYSTEM? The complement system is a part of the immune system and is essential to the body’s defense against infection. Classical Pathway Lectin Pathway Alternative Pathway Made up of 3 UNIQUE PATHWAYS (Classical, Lectin and Alternative) Each pathway can become activated to trigger a cascade of protein reactions that initiate an immune response Inflammation Marks pathogen/damaged to detect and eliminate: cells for elimination Bacteria Viruses Inflammation Targeted destruction of damaged cells Dead cells When the complement system is working properly, it is a strong and powerful tool that protects the body against harmful invaders. • brain But when the system is thrown out of • nervous system balance, or dysregulated, the proteins can trigger a dangerous, uncontrolled cascade • blood stream of reactions that attack cells and tissues. • kidneys UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF THE COMPLEMENT SYSTEM Alexion’s pioneering legacy in rare diseases is rooted in being the first to translate the complex biology of the complement system into transformative medicines. 3 DECADES 20 YEARS of complement of real-world evidence demonstrating the safety inhibition research and power of targeted complement inhibitors Dysregulation of the complement system is a key driver of many devastating diseases. Alexion has paved the way for a new class of medicines that inhibit the complement system, prevent further damage and reduce disease symptoms. Alexion is committed to continue unlocking the potential of the complement system and accelerating the discovery and development of new life-changing therapies for even more patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Hormones and the Immune Response
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.48.1.1 on 1 January 1989. Downloaded from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1989; 48, 1-6 Review Hormones and the immune response Recent advances suggest that the immune system cells, are present on mouse spleen cells3 and human does not function in isolation but is influenced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells.4 Receptors, other physiological systems such as the endocrine identical to those in the central nervous system, for and neuroendocrine systems. This review discusses methionine enkephalin are present on splenocytes aspects of immune function altered by neuroendo- and T lymphocytes.3 In contrast, leucine enkephalin crine peptides, sex hormones, and vitamin D and j3-endorphin receptors on T lymphocyte differ metabolites. from those in the central nervous system as binding cannot be inhibited by opiate antagonists.5 6 In the Neuroendocrine effects case of ,3-endorphin the bindings occur through its carboxy terminal, whereas opiates bind their A system of bidirectional communication between receptor through the amino terminus. This raises the immune and neuroendocrine system exists, in an interesting possibility that a peptide such as which the two systems share a common set of f6-endorphin could form a bridge between two hormones and receptors.'2 Not only do immune lymphocyte subtypes by binding to one through its for peptides, to the and cells possess receptors neuroendocrine amino terminus opiate receptor through copyright. they are also capable of synthesising them and of its carboxy terminus to the non-opiate receptor on responding to them. Products of immune cells affect another lymphocyte.4 the central nervous system, which possesses recep- Other neuroendocrine peptide receptors present tors for cytokines and can also synthesise them on leucocztes include those for neurotensin,7 sub- (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors: What a Difference a ‘Partner’ Makes
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 1112-1142; doi:10.3390/ijms15011112 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review G Protein-Coupled Receptors: What a Difference a ‘Partner’ Makes Benoît T. Roux 1 and Graeme S. Cottrell 2,* 1 Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Reading School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UB, UK * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-118-378-7027; Fax: +44-118-378-4703. Received: 4 December 2013; in revised form: 20 December 2013 / Accepted: 8 January 2014 / Published: 16 January 2014 Abstract: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important cell signaling mediators, involved in essential physiological processes. GPCRs respond to a wide variety of ligands from light to large macromolecules, including hormones and small peptides. Unfortunately, mutations and dysregulation of GPCRs that induce a loss of function or alter expression can lead to disorders that are sometimes lethal. Therefore, the expression, trafficking, signaling and desensitization of GPCRs must be tightly regulated by different cellular systems to prevent disease. Although there is substantial knowledge regarding the mechanisms that regulate the desensitization and down-regulation of GPCRs, less is known about the mechanisms that regulate the trafficking and cell-surface expression of newly synthesized GPCRs. More recently, there is accumulating evidence that suggests certain GPCRs are able to interact with specific proteins that can completely change their fate and function. These interactions add on another level of regulation and flexibility between different tissue/cell-types.
    [Show full text]