Sic Code Index Sic Codes Relating to Industrial Categories
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parker Review
Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people. -
Aggregates Market Investigation
LAFARGE AGGREGATES LIMITED AND LAFARGE CEMENT UK LIMITED OVERVIEW SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPETITION COMMISSION’S STATEMENT OF ISSUES NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION April, 2012 K&E 91146101.1 OVERVIEW SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPETITION COMMISSION’S STATEMENT OF ISSUES 1. This Submission is made by Lafarge Aggregates Limited and Lafarge Cement UK Limited (together, “Lafarge”) in response to the Competition Commission’s (“CC”) Statement of Issues dated 8 March 2012. A. Executive Summary 2. The timing of the CC market investigation into the supply or acquisition of aggregates, cement and ready-mix concrete (“RMX”) (the “MIR”) presents a series of challenges for both the CC and market participants, including Lafarge: Market Decline. The MIR takes place against the backdrop of an economic downturn since 2008 which has been longer and more severe than any experienced by the construction materials industry within the last 30 years. The reduction in volumes has accelerated again in 2012 with year-on-year declines for the first quarter in excess of 10 per cent for aggregates and RMX, while GB cement volumes appear likely to decline or to remain flat at best in 2012. Industry forecasts do not predict any change in these trends before at least 2014, at which point demand is expected still to remain below levels seen in 2009. Any potential improvements will develop from a low base, resulting in sustained and significant levels of overcapacity. Combination of Lafarge and Tarmac. Lafarge announced in February 2011 the proposed combination of its UK construction materials business with that of Tarmac Limited (the “Proposed JV”). -
Cement in 1994, 1.3 Million Tons Was 1.17 Million Tons Or 10% of the Total
CEMENT By Cheryl Solomon The industry's main product, portland California, Southern.—All other counties production, excluding Puerto Rico, increased by cement, makes up 95% of the total domestic in California. 5% to 74.3 million metric tons. production. The remainder comes from Chicago, Metropolitan.—The Illinois The industry operated 118 plants, including masonry, hydraulic, and aluminous cements. counties of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, 8 grinding facilities, to produce various types of In 1994, U.S. demand for cement increased Lake, McHenry, and Will. finished hydraulic cement. by approximately 7%. Domestic production of Illinois.—All other counties in Illinois. The size of individual companies, as a portland cement increased by 5%. Cement New York, Western.—All counties west of percentage of total U.S. finished cement imported for consumption increased to 11.3 a dividing line following the eastern boundaries production capacity, ranged from 0.4% to million metric tons. Portland cement values of Broome, Chenango, Lewis, Madison, 12.7%. The top 10 producing companies, in increased to approximately $61 per metric ton. Oneida, and St. Lawrence Counties. declining order of production, were Holnam New York, Eastern.—All counties east of Inc.; Lafarge Corp.; Essroc Materials, Inc., Legislation and Government Programs the aforementioned dividing line, except Southdown Inc.; Ash Grove Cement Co.; Blue At the beginning of the year, the Metropolitan New York. Circle Inc.; Lone Star Industries, Inc.; Lehigh Environmental Protection Agency announced New York, Metropolitan.—The five counties Portland Cement Co.; California Portland; and the availability of the agency's Report to of New York City (Bronx, Kings, New York, RC Cement Co., Inc. -
Download (13Mb)
University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/60315 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Monopoly Capitalism, Profits, Income Distribution and Unionism. Martin J. Conyon. f ( 0 I ' v" ' I» September 1991. , \ i ,',,' ,_ , A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick CONTENTS Page List of Tables. v List of Figures. vii Acknowledgements viii Declaration. ix Abstract. x Chapter 1 Introduction. 1 Chapter 2 Profitability, income distribution and the degree of monopoly : recent U.K. experience. 5 2.1. Introduction. 5 2.2. Income distribution and the profit rate. 6 2.3. Income distribution, capacity utilisation, and the degree of monopoly 9 2.3.1. Monopoly capitalism, the profit rate and income distribution. 9 2.3.2. A stylised model of monopoly pricing and factor shares. 11 2.4. Recent U.K. evidence. 14 2.4.1. The degree of monopoly. 14 2.4.2. Proximate causes of the changes in the degree of monopoly. 16 2.4.3. Capacity utilisation, overhead costs and wages. 18 2.5 British corporate sector profitability and the functional distribution of income, 1963-1989 : introduction. 19 2.6. The decomposition of the rate of profit. -
CRR 446/2002 a Study of the Provision of Health and Safety Information in the Annual Reports of the Top UK Companies
HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Prepared by System Concepts Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 446/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A study of the provision of health and safety information in the annual reports of the top UK companies Laura Peebles, Ansgar Kupper and Tanya Heasman System Concepts Ltd 2 Savoy Court Strand London WC2R 0EZ This report details the findings of a research project to investigate the quality and quantity of health and safety information found in the annual reports of the top UK companies. At present, publicly listed companies are not legally required to include health and safety matters in their annual reports. The current Health and Safety Commission (HSC) Strategy Statement, however, contains an action point which focuses on public reporting of health and safety issues by larger companies. The aim is to promote the reporting of health and safety information in company annual reports and to provide guidance that would allow reporting of such information to a common standard. To assist the HSC with this strategy, System Concepts were commissioned by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) to undertake an investigation of the provision of health and safety information in company annual reports. The study comprised a series of steps. The main objectives of the study were: i) To determine the current level of reporting of health and safety issues in annual reports of the top UK companies ii) To determine the quality of health and safety information reported. -
Appendix a Companies Excluded from the Sample
Appendix A Companies Excluded from the Sample The 504 companies excluded from the sample are identified below. Along with the company name the original Times 1000 rank number (1970) is given. Reasons for exclusion are: - Company is not British. - Company is not the parent company. - Company has been taken over or has been subject to merger during the study period. - Company is not public quoted. - Company is a bank, finance house or similar. - Company has gone into liquidation during the study period. - Company is government-owned or -controlled. - 50 per cent or more of company shares are within a single holding, i.e. effectively giving outside. control. - Company has completely reformed its capital structure (e.g. by unbundling), thus voiding data continuity. Times 1000 Times 1000 Rank no. Company name Rank no. Company name (1970) (1970) 445 Aberdare Holdings 609 Army & Navy Stores 540 A D International 444 Aspro-Nicholas 477 Adams Butter 013 Associated British Foods 905 Advance Electronics 495 Associated British Maltsters 762 Aerialite 715 Atkinson Lorries 464 Aire Wool 868 Atlas Stone 093 Albright & Wilson 836 Austin-Hall Group 162 Alcan Aluminium 953 Australian Agriculture 349 Alcoa of Great Britain 151 Australian Estates Co. 682 Edgar Allen 330 Averys 661 Alliance Alders 599 A VP Industries 664 Allied English Potteries 630 A W Securities 045 Allied Suppliers 241 Bakelite Xylonite 040 Amalgamated Metal Corpora 613 Balfour Darwins tion 611 Bambergers 880 Jeremiah Ambler 837 Banbury Buildings Holdings 392 Arney Group 718 Bardolin 442 Anglo Thai Corporation 941 Barr & Stroud 388 Armour & Co. 897 Barrow Barnsley 177 178 The Strategy and Performance of British Industry, 1970-80 Times 1000 Times 1000 Rank no. -
Annual General Meeting 2019 Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Notes
This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of the proposals referred to in this document or as to the action you should take, you should seek your own advice from a stockbroker, solicitor, accountant, or other independent professional adviser duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares, please pass this document together with the accompanying Form of Proxy to the purchaser or transferee, or to the person who arranged the sale or transfer, so they can pass these documents to the person who now holds the ordinary shares. Annual General Meeting 2019 Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Notes This document contains Notice of the Annual General Meeting of TT Electronics plc (the “Company”) to be held at the offices of Allen & Overy LLP, One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD on Thursday 9 May 2019 at 10.00am, together with explanatory notes regarding the business of the meeting. The Board considers that all the resolutions to be put to the meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole and recommends that you vote in favour of all the resolutions. Whether or not you propose to attend the Annual General Meeting, please complete and submit a Form of Proxy in accordance with the instructions printed on the enclosed form. The Form of Proxy must be received by the Company’s registrars, Equiniti Limited, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA, as soon as possible, and in any event no later than 10.00am on Tuesday 7 May 2019. -
Strassmann, Inc. Global Information Productivity® Rankings © Copyright 1997, All Rights Reserved
Strassmann, Inc. Global Information Productivity® Rankings © Copyright 1997, All Rights Reserved This document contains selected 1995 Information Productivity® rankings from industrial companies in Strassmann, Inc.’s database of 8,600 global firms. The 1996 ranking of industrial firms will appear in The Productivity of Information Management , The Information Economics Press, 1998. Definitions Rank: Information Productivity (IP) rankings of 510 industrial firms, with employment of over 15,000 and satisfying a number of financial criteria. Information Management Expenses: Sales, General, Administrative, Research and Development costs. Profits: Net Income after Income Taxes, before Preferred Dividends About Strassmann, Inc. Strassmann, Inc. offers Information Productivity Assessment services to firms wishing to benchmark their performance. Comparisons are made against look-alike firms as well as competitors. Ten year trend analysis in factors contributing to Information Productivity are included in each case. For further information and analytical services, send email to [email protected], or visit our web site, http://www.strassmann.com Available Services 1. Information Productivity ® Assessment Ranking a firm’s information management performance as compared with look- alike organizations. Includes: Ten year analysis of trends, ratio of information to finance costs, correlation with standard measures of financial performance and tabulation of over- or under-performance relative to industry peer group. Detects shifts from labor to capital-intensive information work. Application: Diagnostic method for justifying, planning and budgeting expenditures for information resources. 2. Knowledge Capital ® Assessment Ranking a firm’s performance in terms of is accumulation of knowledge assets as compared with-alike organizations. Includes: Ten year trend analyses, ratio of finance and knowledge capital, comparisons with market valuation (if available) and valuation of employees as assets and not as an expense. -
RMC Group P.L.C. Annual Report and Accounts 2001
2001 FC R&A 20/3/03 12:23 pm Page 1 RE P O R T RMC Group p.l.c. Annual Report and Accounts 2001 The RMC Group is a multinational Financial highlights 1 enterprise operating across four Segmental analysis 1 2001 Operational statistics 2 continents, fulfilling the demand Group activities 3 for building materials – concrete, Chairman’s review 4 Chief Executive’s review 5 aggregates and cement. Environmental and social review 8 Finance Director’s review 12 Board of Directors 14 Board committees 16 Directors’ report 17 Remuneration report 21 Report of the Auditors 26 Accounting policies 27 Directors’ responsibilities in relation to financial statements 29 Group profit and loss account 30 Group balance sheet 31 Parent company balance sheet 32 Group cash flow statement 33 Statement of total recognised gains and losses 34 Movements in shareholders’ equity funds 34 Notes to the accounts 35 Group financial review 59 Principal subsidiary undertakings, Registered Number: 249776 Registered Office: joint ventures and associated undertakings 60 RMC House, Coldharbour Lane, Thorpe, Egham, Surrey TW20 8TD, United Kingdom Supplementary financial information in Euros 62 Telephone: +44 (0)1932 568833 Facsimile: +44 (0)1932 568933 www.rmc-group.com Shareholder information 64 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2001 2000 Total turnover £5,214.5m £5,055.2m 00005501111051110511105111 EBITA* £329.6m £340.3m 00005501111051110511105111 Total trading profit* £294.9m £307.9m 00005501111051110511105111 Profit before taxation* £170.7m £208.3m 00005501111051110511105111 Earnings per -
View Annual Report
Babcock International Group PLC Babcock Annual International PLC Group Report and Financial Statements 2000 Babcock International Group PLC Babcock International Group PLC Badminton Court Church Street Amersham Bucks HP7 0DD Annual report and financial statements 2000 Telephone 01494 727296 Fax 01494 721909 Website www.babcock.co.uk systems+services Shareholder information Financial calendar Registered office and company number Auditors Financial year end 31 March 2000 Arthur Andersen Badminton Court 1 Surrey Street 1999/2000 preliminary results announced Church Street Babcock International is a London WC2R 2PS 19 June 2000 Amersham Buckinghamshire HP7 0DD Annual General Meeting Principal UK bankers 28 July 2000 Registered in England. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc Company number 2342138 Waterhouse Square multinational engineered Final dividend payment date (record date 14 July 138-142 Holborn 2000) Registrars London EC3P 3HX. 11 August 2000 Computershare Services PLC systems and services group, Half year results announced PO Box No 82, The Pavilions Investment bankers 16 November 2000 Bridgwater Road, Bristol BS99 7NH. N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd New Court Interim dividend payable Shareholder enquiries relating to shareholding, St. Swithin’s Lane 26 January 2001 dividend payments, change of address, loss of London EC4P 4DU. headquartered in the UK. share certificate etc. should be addressed to Share dealing service Computershare Services PLC at their address Stockbrokers The company, through National Westminster given above. Merrill Lynch Bank Plc, offers a special share dealing PO Box 293 service to shareholders either by post or through 20 Farringdon Road NatWest branches. Shareholders who wish to London EC1M 3NH use either of these facilities are asked to telephone 020 7895 5448 or alternatively to write to NatWest Stockbrokers Limited, Executing business worldwide Babcock International Group Information, from its operations in 16 countries. -
Aircraft Design
THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF WORLD WAR ONE AERO HISTORIANS THE ’14 - ’18 JOURNAL INDEX: 1964 – 2016 Article Title Journal Page AEROBATICS ”Hanging on the Prop” 1964 Spring 139 AERODROMES BRITISH AFC Leave UK – Leighterton and Minchinhampton Airfields 1999 38 British Airfields and Bases 1986 74 Hendon and its Aerodrome Explained 1911-1987 2008 11 Kingsnorth Airship Station and its Beginnings 1989 10 Kingsnorth Airship Station and its Beginnings 2012+ 87 Where was Kingsnorth Airship Station? 1974-75 62 AERODROMES - GERMAN German Flying Fields 1965 Winter 13 Sissonne 1965 Winter 45 AIRCRAFT CONSTRUCTION (see also: “Aircraft Maintenance”) British Timber for Aircraft Construction 1964 Spring 145 Compass for the Nowra Pup, A 2001 61 New Sopwith Pup at Nowra, A 1998 85 S.B.C.A., The 2006 34 Wing Spars - Constructional Details (Illustration) 1967 80 Wire Bracing in Early Aircraft – “Wire in the Wind” 2006 21 AIRCRAFT DESIGN Aileron Surface to Wing Area - For Various Wartime German Aircraft 1970 21 Austin Aeroplanes 1996 33 “Battleplanes”, Defining a Forgotten Class of Aircraft of WW1 1975-76 54 Birdman’s Bird, The (Arthur M. McIntosh) 1972-73 38 Development of the Large Flying Boat for Naval War Purposes ( Captain A.E. Bolton) 2012 21 Designing at Albatros – Part One: The Early Years 2015 Vol 2 106 Designing at Albatros – Part Two: Success and Failure 2016 Vol 1 3 Designing Fokker Aeroplanes – Part One: The Early Aeroplanes 2012 54 Designing Fokker Aeroplanes – Part Two: Developing Cantilever Wings 2013 Vol 1 30 Designing Sopwith Aeroplanes – A -
NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY (Incorporated in England and Wales Under the Building Societies Act 1986, As Amended)
NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY (incorporated in England and Wales under the Building Societies Act 1986, as amended) €45 billion Global Covered Bond Programme unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed as to payments by Nationwide Covered Bonds LLP (a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales) Under this €45 billion covered bond programme (the Programme), Nationwide Building Society (the Issuer) may from time to time issue bonds (the Covered Bonds) denominated in any currency agreed between the Issuer and the relevant Dealer(s) (as defined below). The price and amount of the Covered Bonds to be issued under the Programme will be determined by the Issuer and the relevant Dealer at the time of issue in accordance with prevailing market conditions. Nationwide Covered Bonds LLP (the LLP) has guaranteed payments of interest and principal under the Covered Bonds pursuant to a guarantee which is secured over the Portfolio (as defined below) and its other assets. Recourse against the LLP under its guarantee is limited to the Portfolio and such assets. Covered Bonds may be issued in bearer or registered form. The maximum aggregate nominal amount of all Covered Bonds from time to time outstanding under the Programme will not exceed €45 billion (or its equivalent in other currencies calculated as described in the Programme Agreement described herein), subject to increase as described herein. The Covered Bonds may be issued on a continuing basis to one or more of the Dealers specified under "Overview of the Programme" and any additional Dealer appointed under the Programme from time to time by the Issuer (each, a Dealer and together, the Dealers), which appointment may be to a specific issue or on an ongoing basis.