Statistical Methods for the Analysis of the Genetics of Gene Expression
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Method to Infer Changed Activity of Metabolic Function from Transcript Profiles
ModeScore: A Method to Infer Changed Activity of Metabolic Function from Transcript Profiles Andreas Hoppe and Hermann-Georg Holzhütter Charité University Medicine Berlin, Institute for Biochemistry, Computational Systems Biochemistry Group [email protected] Abstract Genome-wide transcript profiles are often the only available quantitative data for a particular perturbation of a cellular system and their interpretation with respect to the metabolism is a major challenge in systems biology, especially beyond on/off distinction of genes. We present a method that predicts activity changes of metabolic functions by scoring reference flux distributions based on relative transcript profiles, providing a ranked list of most regulated functions. Then, for each metabolic function, the involved genes are ranked upon how much they represent a specific regulation pattern. Compared with the naïve pathway-based approach, the reference modes can be chosen freely, and they represent full metabolic functions, thus, directly provide testable hypotheses for the metabolic study. In conclusion, the novel method provides promising functions for subsequent experimental elucidation together with outstanding associated genes, solely based on transcript profiles. 1998 ACM Subject Classification J.3 Life and Medical Sciences Keywords and phrases Metabolic network, expression profile, metabolic function Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/OASIcs.GCB.2012.1 1 Background The comprehensive study of the cell’s metabolism would include measuring metabolite concentrations, reaction fluxes, and enzyme activities on a large scale. Measuring fluxes is the most difficult part in this, for a recent assessment of techniques, see [31]. Although mass spectrometry allows to assess metabolite concentrations in a more comprehensive way, the larger the set of potential metabolites, the more difficult [8]. -
The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome Minoru Kanehisa Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University HFSPO Workshop, Strasbourg, November 18, 2016 The KEGG Databases Category Database Content PATHWAY KEGG pathway maps Systems information BRITE BRITE functional hierarchies MODULE KEGG modules KO (KEGG ORTHOLOGY) KO groups for functional orthologs Genomic information GENOME KEGG organisms, viruses and addendum GENES / SSDB Genes and proteins / sequence similarity COMPOUND Chemical compounds GLYCAN Glycans Chemical information REACTION / RCLASS Reactions / reaction classes ENZYME Enzyme nomenclature DISEASE Human diseases DRUG / DGROUP Drugs / drug groups Health information ENVIRON Health-related substances (KEGG MEDICUS) JAPIC Japanese drug labels DailyMed FDA drug labels 12 manually curated original DBs 3 DBs taken from outside sources and given original annotations (GENOME, GENES, ENZYME) 1 computationally generated DB (SSDB) 2 outside DBs (JAPIC, DailyMed) KEGG is widely used for functional interpretation and practical application of genome sequences and other high-throughput data KO PATHWAY GENOME BRITE DISEASE GENES MODULE DRUG Genome Molecular High-level Practical Metagenome functions functions applications Transcriptome etc. Metabolome Glycome etc. COMPOUND GLYCAN REACTION Funding Annual budget Period Funding source (USD) 1995-2010 Supported by 10+ grants from Ministry of Education, >2 M Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) 2011-2013 Supported by National Bioscience Database Center 0.8 M (NBDC) of JST 2014-2016 Supported by NBDC 0.5 M 2017- ? 1995 KEGG website made freely available 1997 KEGG FTP site made freely available 2011 Plea to support KEGG KEGG FTP academic subscription introduced 1998 First commercial licensing Contingency Plan 1999 Pathway Solutions Inc. -
3 13437143.Pdf
Title Integrative Annotation of 21,037 Human Genes Validated by Full-Length cDNA Clones Imanishi, Tadashi; Itoh, Takeshi; Suzuki, Yutaka; O'Donovan, Claire; Fukuchi, Satoshi; Koyanagi, Kanako O.; Barrero, Roberto A.; Tamura, Takuro; Yamaguchi-Kabata, Yumi; Tanino, Motohiko; Yura, Kei; Miyazaki, Satoru; Ikeo, Kazuho; Homma, Keiichi; Kasprzyk, Arek; Nishikawa, Tetsuo; Hirakawa, Mika; Thierry-Mieg, Jean; Thierry-Mieg, Danielle; Ashurst, Jennifer; Jia, Libin; Nakao, Mitsuteru; Thomas, Michael A.; Mulder, Nicola; Karavidopoulou, Youla; Jin, Lihua; Kim, Sangsoo; Yasuda, Tomohiro; Lenhard, Boris; Eveno, Eric; Suzuki, Yoshiyuki; Yamasaki, Chisato; Takeda, Jun-ichi; Gough, Craig; Hilton, Phillip; Fujii, Yasuyuki; Sakai, Hiroaki; Tanaka, Susumu; Amid, Clara; Bellgard, Matthew; Bonaldo, Maria de Fatima; Bono, Hidemasa; Bromberg, Susan K.; Brookes, Anthony J.; Bruford, Elspeth; Carninci, Piero; Chelala, Claude; Couillault, Christine; Souza, Sandro J. de; Debily, Marie-Anne; Devignes, Marie-Dominique; Dubchak, Inna; Endo, Toshinori; Estreicher, Anne; Eyras, Eduardo; Fukami-Kobayashi, Kaoru; R. Gopinath, Gopal; Graudens, Esther; Hahn, Yoonsoo; Han, Michael; Han, Ze-Guang; Hanada, Kousuke; Hanaoka, Hideki; Harada, Erimi; Hashimoto, Katsuyuki; Hinz, Ursula; Hirai, Momoki; Hishiki, Teruyoshi; Hopkinson, Ian; Imbeaud, Sandrine; Inoko, Hidetoshi; Kanapin, Alexander; Kaneko, Yayoi; Kasukawa, Takeya; Kelso, Janet; Kersey, Author(s) Paul; Kikuno, Reiko; Kimura, Kouichi; Korn, Bernhard; Kuryshev, Vladimir; Makalowska, Izabela; Makino, Takashi; Mano, Shuhei; -
Ontology-Based Methods for Analyzing Life Science Data
Habilitation a` Diriger des Recherches pr´esent´ee par Olivier Dameron Ontology-based methods for analyzing life science data Soutenue publiquement le 11 janvier 2016 devant le jury compos´ede Anita Burgun Professeur, Universit´eRen´eDescartes Paris Examinatrice Marie-Dominique Devignes Charg´eede recherches CNRS, LORIA Nancy Examinatrice Michel Dumontier Associate professor, Stanford University USA Rapporteur Christine Froidevaux Professeur, Universit´eParis Sud Rapporteure Fabien Gandon Directeur de recherches, Inria Sophia-Antipolis Rapporteur Anne Siegel Directrice de recherches CNRS, IRISA Rennes Examinatrice Alexandre Termier Professeur, Universit´ede Rennes 1 Examinateur 2 Contents 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Context ......................................... 10 1.2 Challenges . 11 1.3 Summary of the contributions . 14 1.4 Organization of the manuscript . 18 2 Reasoning based on hierarchies 21 2.1 Principle......................................... 21 2.1.1 RDF for describing data . 21 2.1.2 RDFS for describing types . 24 2.1.3 RDFS entailments . 26 2.1.4 Typical uses of RDFS entailments in life science . 26 2.1.5 Synthesis . 30 2.2 Case study: integrating diseases and pathways . 31 2.2.1 Context . 31 2.2.2 Objective . 32 2.2.3 Linking pathways and diseases using GO, KO and SNOMED-CT . 32 2.2.4 Querying associated diseases and pathways . 33 2.3 Methodology: Web services composition . 39 2.3.1 Context . 39 2.3.2 Objective . 40 2.3.3 Semantic compatibility of services parameters . 40 2.3.4 Algorithm for pairing services parameters . 40 2.4 Application: ontology-based query expansion with GO2PUB . 43 2.4.1 Context . 43 2.4.2 Objective . -
Genbank by Walter B
GenBank by Walter B. Goad o understand the significance of the information stored in memory—DNA—to the stuff of activity—proteins. The idea that GenBank, you need to know a little about molecular somehow the bases in DNA determine the amino acids in proteins genetics. What that field deals with is self-replication—the had been around for some time. In fact, George Gamow suggested in T process unique to life—and mutation and 1954, after learning about the structure proposed for DNA, that a recombination—the processes responsible for evolution-at the triplet of bases corresponded to an amino acid. That suggestion was fundamental level of the genes in DNA. This approach of working shown to be true, and by 1965 most of the genetic code had been from the blueprint, so to speak, of a living system is very powerful, deciphered. Also worked out in the ’60s were many details of what and studies of many other aspects of life—the process of learning, for Crick called the central dogma of molecular genetics—the now example—are now utilizing molecular genetics. firmly established fact that DNA is not translated directly to proteins Molecular genetics began in the early ’40s and was at first but is first transcribed to messenger RNA. This molecule, a nucleic controversial because many of the people involved had been trained acid like DNA, then serves as the template for protein synthesis. in the physical sciences rather than the biological sciences, and yet These great advances prompted a very distinguished molecular they were answering questions that biologists had been asking for geneticist to predict, in 1969, that biology was just about to end since years. -
Causal Diagrams for Interference Elizabeth L
STATISTICAL SCIENCE Volume 29, Number 4 November 2014 Special Issue on Semiparametrics and Causal Inference Causal Etiology of the Research of James M. Robins ..............................................Thomas S. Richardson and Andrea Rotnitzky 459 Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization ..........................Miroslav Dudík, Dumitru Erhan, John Langford and Lihong Li 485 Statistics,CausalityandBell’sTheorem.....................................Richard D. Gill 512 Standardization and Control for Confounding in Observational Studies: A Historical Perspective..............................................Niels Keiding and David Clayton 529 CausalDiagramsforInterference............Elizabeth L. Ogburn and Tyler J. VanderWeele 559 External Validity: From do-calculus to Transportability Across Populations .........................................................Judea Pearl and Elias Bareinboim 579 Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects .................Amy Richardson, Michael G. Hudgens, Peter B. Gilbert and Jason P. Fine 596 The Bayesian Analysis of Complex, High-Dimensional Models: Can It Be CODA? .......................................Y.Ritov,P.J.Bickel,A.C.GamstandB.J.K.Kleijn 619 Q-andA-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes .............. Phillip J. Schulte, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Eric B. Laber and Marie Davidian 640 A Uniformly Consistent Estimator of Causal Effects under the k-Triangle-Faithfulness Assumption...................................................Peter Spirtes -
Research Report 2006 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin Imprint | Research Report 2006
MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS Research Report 2006 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin Imprint | Research Report 2006 Published by the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (MPIMG), Berlin, Germany, August 2006 Editorial Board Bernhard Herrmann, Hans Lehrach, H.-Hilger Ropers, Martin Vingron Coordination Claudia Falter, Ingrid Stark Design & Production UNICOM Werbeagentur GmbH, Berlin Number of copies: 1,500 Photos Katrin Ullrich, MPIMG; David Ausserhofer Contact Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Ihnestr. 63–73 14195 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 (0)30-8413 - 0 Fax: +49 (0)30-8413 - 1207 Email: [email protected] For further information about the MPIMG please see our website: www.molgen.mpg.de MPI for Molecular Genetics Research Report 2006 Table of Contents The Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics . 4 • Organisational Structure. 4 • MPIMG – Mission, Development of the Institute, Research Concept. .5 Department of Developmental Genetics (Bernhard Herrmann) . 7 • Transmission ratio distortion (Hermann Bauer) . .11 • Signal Transduction in Embryogenesis and Tumor Progression (Markus Morkel). 14 • Development of Endodermal Organs (Heiner Schrewe) . 16 • Gene Expression and 3D-Reconstruction (Ralf Spörle). 18 • Somitogenesis (Lars Wittler). 21 Department of Vertebrate Genomics (Hans Lehrach) . 25 • Molecular Embryology and Aging (James Adjaye). .31 • Protein Expression and Protein Structure (Konrad Büssow). .34 • Mass Spectrometry (Johan Gobom). 37 • Bioinformatics (Ralf Herwig). .40 • Comparative and Functional Genomics (Heinz Himmelbauer). 44 • Genetic Variation (Margret Hoehe). 48 • Cell Arrays/Oligofingerprinting (Michal Janitz). .52 • Kinetic Modeling (Edda Klipp) . .56 • In Vitro Ligand Screening (Zoltán Konthur). .60 • Neurodegenerative Disorders (Sylvia Krobitsch). .64 • Protein Complexes & Cell Organelle Assembly/ USN (Bodo Lange/Thorsten Mielke). .67 • Automation & Technology Development (Hans Lehrach). -
Integrative Annotation of 21,037 Human Genes Validated by Full-Length Cdna Clones
Title Integrative Annotation of 21,037 Human Genes Validated by Full-Length cDNA Clones Imanishi, Tadashi; Itoh, Takeshi; Suzuki, Yutaka; O'Donovan, Claire; Fukuchi, Satoshi; Koyanagi, Kanako O.; Barrero, Roberto A.; Tamura, Takuro; Yamaguchi-Kabata, Yumi; Tanino, Motohiko; Yura, Kei; Miyazaki, Satoru; Ikeo, Kazuho; Homma, Keiichi; Kasprzyk, Arek; Nishikawa, Tetsuo; Hirakawa, Mika; Thierry-Mieg, Jean; Thierry-Mieg, Danielle; Ashurst, Jennifer; Jia, Libin; Nakao, Mitsuteru; Thomas, Michael A.; Mulder, Nicola; Karavidopoulou, Youla; Jin, Lihua; Kim, Sangsoo; Yasuda, Tomohiro; Lenhard, Boris; Eveno, Eric; Suzuki, Yoshiyuki; Yamasaki, Chisato; Takeda, Jun-ichi; Gough, Craig; Hilton, Phillip; Fujii, Yasuyuki; Sakai, Hiroaki; Tanaka, Susumu; Amid, Clara; Bellgard, Matthew; Bonaldo, Maria de Fatima; Bono, Hidemasa; Bromberg, Susan K.; Brookes, Anthony J.; Bruford, Elspeth; Carninci, Piero; Chelala, Claude; Couillault, Christine; Souza, Sandro J. de; Debily, Marie-Anne; Devignes, Marie-Dominique; Dubchak, Inna; Endo, Toshinori; Estreicher, Anne; Eyras, Eduardo; Fukami-Kobayashi, Kaoru; R. Gopinath, Gopal; Graudens, Esther; Hahn, Yoonsoo; Han, Michael; Han, Ze-Guang; Hanada, Kousuke; Hanaoka, Hideki; Harada, Erimi; Hashimoto, Katsuyuki; Hinz, Ursula; Hirai, Momoki; Hishiki, Teruyoshi; Hopkinson, Ian; Imbeaud, Sandrine; Inoko, Hidetoshi; Kanapin, Alexander; Kaneko, Yayoi; Kasukawa, Takeya; Kelso, Janet; Kersey, Author(s) Paul; Kikuno, Reiko; Kimura, Kouichi; Korn, Bernhard; Kuryshev, Vladimir; Makalowska, Izabela; Makino, Takashi; Mano, Shuhei; -
Next Generation Machine Learning Prediction of Protein Cellular Sorting
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Lehrstuhl für Bioinformatik Next Generation Machine Learning Prediction of Protein Cellular Sorting Tatyana Goldberg Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Daniel Cremers Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Burkhard Rost 2. Prof. Dr. Yana Bromberg, The State University of New Jersey/USA 3. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Iris Antes Die Dissertation wurde am 15.12.2015 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Informatik am 22.03.2016 angenommen. ii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. v Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ ix List of publications ........................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................................................... xiii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... -
First Analysis Steps
FirstFirst analysisanalysis stepssteps o quality control and optimization o calibration and error modeling o data transformations Wolfgang Huber Dep. of Molecular Genome Analysis (A. Poustka) DKFZ Heidelberg Acknowledgements Anja von Heydebreck Günther Sawitzki Holger Sültmann, Klaus Steiner, Markus Vogt, Jörg Schneider, Frank Bergmann, Florian Haller, Katharina Finis, Stephanie Süß, Anke Schroth, Friederike Wilmer, Judith Boer, Martin Vingron, Annemarie Poustka Sandrine Dudoit, Robert Gentleman, Rafael Irizarry and Yee Hwa Yang: Bioconductor short course, summer 2002 and many others a microarray slide Slide: 25x75 mm Spot-to-spot: ca. 150-350 µm 4 x 4 or 8x4 sectors 17...38 rows and columns per sector ca. 4600…46000 probes/array sector: corresponds to one print-tip Terminology sample: RNA (cDNA) hybridized to the array, aka target, mobile substrate. probe: DNA spotted on the array, aka spot, immobile substrate. sector: rectangular matrix of spots printed using the same print-tip (or pin), aka print-tip-group plate: set of 384 (768) spots printed with DNA from the same microtitre plate of clones slide, array channel: data from one color (Cy3 = cyanine 3 = green, Cy5 = cyanine 5 = red). batch: collection of microarrays with the same probe layout. Raw data scanner signal resolution: 5 or 10 mm spatial, 16 bit (65536) dynamical per channel ca. 30-50 pixels per probe (60 µm spot size) 40 MB per array Raw data scanner signal resolution: 5 or 10 mm spatial, 16 bit (65536) dynamical per channel ca. 30-50 pixels per probe (60 µm spot size) 40 MB per array Image Analysis Raw data scanner signal resolution: 5 or 10 mm spatial, 16 bit (65536) dynamical per channel ca. -
Probabilistic Models for Gene Silencing Data
Probabilistic Models for Gene Silencing Data Florian Markowetz Dezember 2005 Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) am Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Freien Universit¨atBerlin 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Martin Vingron 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Klaus-Robert M¨uller Tag der Promotion: 26. April 2006 Preface Acknowledgements This work was carried out in the Computational Diagnostics group of the Department of Computational Molecular Biology at the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics in Berlin. I thank all past and present colleagues for the good working atmosphere and the scientific—and sometimes maybe not so scientific—discussions. Especially, I am grateful to my supervisor Rainer Spang for suggesting the topic, his scientific support, and the opportunity to write this thesis under his guidance. I thank Michael Boutros for providing the expression data and for introducing me to the world of RNAi when I visited his lab at the DKFZ in Heidelberg. I thank Anja von Heydebreck, J¨org Schultz, and Martin Vingron for their advice and counsel as members of my PhD commitee. During the time I worked on this thesis, I enjoyed fruitful discussions with many people. In particular, I gratefully acknowledge Jacques Bloch, Steffen Grossmann, Achim Tresch, and Chen-Hsiang Yeang for their contributions. Special thanks go to Viola Gesellchen, Britta Koch, Stefanie Scheid, Stefan Bentink, Stefan Haas, Dennis Kostka, and Stefan R¨opcke, who read drafts of this thesis and greatly improved it by their comments. Publications Parts of this thesis have been published before. Chapter 2 grew out of lectures I gave in 2005 at the Instiute for Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (IPM) in Tehran, Iran, and at the German Conference on Bioinformatics (GCB), Hamburg, Germany. -
The Analysis of RNA-Seq Experiments Using Approximate Likelihood
The analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using approximate likelihood Daniel C. Jones A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: Walter L. Ruzzo, Chair Sreeram Kannan Georg Seelig Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering ©Copyright 2020 Daniel C. Jones University of Washington Abstract The analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using approximate likelihood Daniel C. Jones Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Walter L. Ruzzo Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering The analysis of mRNA transcript abundance with RNA-Seq is a central tool in molecular biology research, but often analyses fail to account for the uncertainty in these estimates, which can be significant, especially when trying to disentangle isoforms or duplicated genes. Preserving uncertainty necessitates a full probabilistic model of the all the sequencing reads, which quickly becomes intractable, as experiments can consist of billions of reads. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method of approximat- ing the likelihood function of a sparse mixture model, using a technique we call the Pólya tree transformation. We demonstrate that substituting this approximation for the real thing achieves most of the benefits with a fraction of the computational costs, leading to more accurate detection of differential transcript expression. 3 4 For Maddie. Let’s have some more normal ones. Contents 1 the analysis