Kiribati Knowledge-Holders 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

KIRIBATI KNOWLEDGE-HOLDERS 2014 "PULOTU" Pacific Peoples Knowledge-Holders NAME OF PULOTU/Knowledge-Holder PACIFIC ISLANDS AFFILIATIONS REGIONAL LOCATION AREA OF HERITAGE ARTS PRACTICE AMUERA, Taabeta Kiribati, Nikunau Auckland HPA DANCE - Te Tireree AUE, Mesita KIRIBATI, Tamana Auckland HPA DANCE - Karao Tibuta BAINREBU, Tonganibeia KIRIBATI, Tarawa Auckland HPA DANCE - Te Kabuti; Te Kaimatoa BAITEKE, Anatin KIRIBATI Waikato HPA DANCE - Mwaie/Te Kabuti BAITEKE, Atee KIRIBATI Waikato HPA DANCE - Mwaie - Te Kabuti BAITEKE, Mareta KIRIBATI Waikato HPA DANCE - Mwaie/Te Kabuti; Mwaie/Te Kaimatoa BAITEKE, Martha KIRIBATI Waikato HPA DANCE - Mwaie/Te Kabuti; Mwaie/Te Kaimatoa BEEN, Kiataakee KIRIBATI Butaritari Auckland HPA DANCE BIO, Rachel KIRIBATI, Marakei Waikato Dist HLBA - Te Taetae ni Kiribati BIO, Taabwe KIRIBATI, Marakei Waikato Dist HPA - Mwaie - Te Kaimatoa DR BIO, Tabwe KIRIBATI, Marakei Waikato Dist HLBA - Te Katei ni Kiribati BIO, Tekatau KIRIBATI, Marakei Waikato Dist HPA - Mwaie - Te Kaimatoa; Mwaie - Te Bino BURENTAU, Teakatia KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Katei Mwaie CHARTERIS, Chris KIRIBATI -FIJIAN Auckland HMA - Sculpture ERIA, Tione KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Katei Mwaie/ Katei HUMPHRY, Louisa KIRIBATI Waikato HMA - Raranga ITAAKARA, Aatiri KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Katei Mwaie JEREMIA, Iurika KIRIBATI, Nonouti Auckland HPA - Kiribati song composer; storyteller KAITAAKE, Kaiana KIRIBATI, Tarawa Auckland HPA - Katei mwaie/Kiribati cultural dance MAREKO, Raakera KIRIBATI, Beru Auckland HPA - Karao Tibuta POLA, Nei Tiiko KIRIBATI, Nonouti Auckland HPA - Karao Tibuta RABANGAKI,Kinaitio KIRIBATI, Tarawa Auckland HPA - Anene; Karerake RABANGAKI, Sengalo KIRIBATI, Tarawa Auckland HPA - Anene (solo) RAKE, Tenano KIRIBATI Waikato HPA - Mwaie/Te Bino REDFERN, Mareta KIRIBATI, Butaritari Auckland HPA - Anene; Mwaie REDFERN, Mikaere KIRIBATI, Butaritari Auckland HPA - Aurere; Mwaie REDFERN, Tutu KIRIBATI Butaritari Auckland HPA - Anene ao Mwaie; Kaina te Mwaie TABURIMAI, Ruitia KIRIBATI Rodney District HPA - Tia Katei Mwaie (Dancer) TABURUEA, Naomi B. KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Dance TANGAROA, Metutera KIRIBATI Otahuhu, Auckland HPA - Te Karerake (lead vocal; choir, Kiribati performing arts) TANIERA, Mareko KIRIBATI, Beru Auckland HPA - Te Katei ni Kiribati. HLBA - Karakia ni Kiribati TAURAOI, Abolima KIRIBATI, Tamana Auckland HPA - “Karaotibuta” TAUMAN, Caroline KIRIBATI, Tamana Waikato Dist HPA - Mwaie/Te Kabuti; Mwaie/Te Kaimatoa TAUMAN, Tibwere KIRIBATI, Tamana Waikato Dist HPA - Te Karerake TEATAO, Lydia I. KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Anene ao Mwaie TEKAMAEU, Matavalu KIRIBATI Auckland HPA - Anene ao Mwaie TENANOA, Kaimanga KIRIBATI, Tarawa Auckland HPA - Katei mwaie; Kaira Mwaie TIAOU, Maote KIRIBATI Waikato HPA - Mwaie/Te Kaimatoa; May/Te Bino URO, Moareti KIRIBATI, Tarawa Waikato Dist HPA - Te Katei ni Kiribati. HLBA - Karakia ni Kiribati WATSON, Kaetaeta KIRIBATI Auckland HMA - Raranga; Arts & Crafts; Kiribati Traditional Foods.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Hard Custom, Hard Dance : Social Organisation, (Un)
PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Academic Dissertation to be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium XII of the Main Building, April 17th, 2010, at 10 a.m. PETRA M. AUTIO HARD CUSTOM, HARD DANCE SOCIAL ORGANISATION, (UN)DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN A TABITEUEAN COMMUNITY, SOUTHERN KIRIBATI Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki Academic Dissertation Research Series in Anthropology University of Helsinki, Finland Distributed by Helsinki University Press P.O. Box 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland fax +358-9-7010 2374 http://www.yliopistopaino.fi ISSN 1458-3186 ISBN 978-952-10-6150-9 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-6151-6 (PDF) Helsinki University Print Helsinki 2010 To my daughter Oili Raakel Maria CONTENTS List of illustrations vii Notes on names, citations and typographical conventions viii Acknowledgements ix 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Social Differentiation, Undifferentiation and Power in Southern Kiribati 3 Kiribati Introduced 11 The Kiribati Custom 15 Tabiteuea and Its Northern District 17 Tabiteuean Custom and Its Hardness 19 Kiribati Studied 21 Fieldwork and Research Questions 27 The Approach and Course of Chapters 29 2. THE ANCESTOR WITHOUT DESCENDANTS: DIFFERENTIATION AND NOTIONS OF POWER IN TABITEUEA 33 Chiefs Are Forbidden? Myth, history, concept 33 Story of the Story 36 The Story of Kourabi (Karakin Kourabi) 42 Lines of power: The Karongoa clan 46 The apical ancestor: Tematawarebwe the first-born 50 Children of many fathers 52 The twofold ancestor: Akau the younger brother 53 Karongoa clan and power 56 Dualities and Transformation of Power 58 Power in the (Un)making 62 Making men, making chiefs 64 Making women 68 Binding but Not Unbinding: Remaining tabu 76 Power in his things 77 Power in the bones 80 Summary: Differentiation and its cut-off point 83 3.
[Show full text]
Kiribati Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
KIRIBATI FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Aranuka Island (Gilbert Group) Picture by: Raitiata Cati Prepared by: Environment and Conservation Division - MELAD 20 th September 2010 1 Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: OVERVIEW OF BIODIVERSITY, STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS .................................................... 8 1.1 Geography and geological setting of Kiribati ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Status of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Water Resources ..........................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Kiribati Country Report to the Conference of Parties (COP) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI Kiribati Country Report to The Conference of Parties (COP) of The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2007 Prepared by Environment and Conservation Division Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development Foreword By the Minister of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development It is with considerable pleasure that I forward this document to the Conference of the Parties and the United Nations Development Programme. The document represents an important step in the desire of the Republic of Kiribati to protect the biodiversity and promote the sustainable utilization of the marine and terrestrial resources of Kiribati. I feel this is an appropriate approach to take towards biodiversity conservation in Kiribati. Conservation of biological diversity and the environment has been part of the life of the I-Kiribati ever since the first settlement of the Kiribati atolls. The new international concept of biodiversity conservation has highlighted the increasing degree of human influence on nature. Most of the damage is caused by the increasing demand for consumed goods and energy which is exacerbated by Kiribati’s rapid increase in population. Conservation is for the people and should be implemented by the people. Community consultations and participatory efforts of local communities have provided invaluable contributions to the formulation of this document. The multi-sectoral composition of the members of the Steering Committee and Planning team, and the collaborative efforts between stakeholders, both public and private, indicates a widespread belief of responsibility towards the conservation of biodiversity. The involvement of other Government departments and ministries, together with other environmental programs such as the National Biosafety Framework (NBF), Persistant Organic Pollutants (POPs), International Waters Project Kiribati (IWPK) and National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) have enriched the scope of the project in all directions.
[Show full text]
Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M
Ciguatera and Other Marine Poisoning in the Gilbert Islands' M. J. COOPER 2 AMONG THE ANIMALS that live in the sea are was involved little.notice was taken. During and many that may be poisonous to eat; these ani after World W ar II attention was drawn to the mals include fish, sharks, crabs, molluscs, and problem, as there.were .many..rnore.people.in the · turtles. Of all marine animals the most impor Pacific who were poisoned by supposedly good tant are fish, which are for so many people an food fish, often in-areas where toxic fish had essential source of food. There are a number of been previously unknown. different ways in which teleost fish may be poi Although the symptoms of ciguatera poison sonous. Some fish are naturally poisonous; puf ing, the species of fish likely to-cause it, and fers for instance are always toxic. Some species many of the areas harboring toxic species have of fish can be poisonous at certain seasons; in been recorded, several aspects ''of the .problem Fiji there is a species of sardine which may be still remain to be solved. In spite of recent re deadly poisonous in the later months of the search into ciguatera poisoning,an'antidote to year. A third type of poisoning is found where the poison, a field test for distinguishing atoxic some fish are poisonous to eat when they are fish from a nontoxic one, the ,true nature of the caught on certain reefs or parts of a reef, and yet toxin, and the cause of the development of-eigua when caught on other parts of the same reef, or tera among fishes have not yet been discovered.
[Show full text]
Plants of Kiribati
KIRIBATI State of the Environment Report 2000-2002 Government of the Republic of Kiribati 2004 PREPARED BY THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION Ministry of Environment Lands & Agricultural Development Nei Akoako MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMEN P.O. BOX 234 BIKENIBEU, TARAWA KIRIBATI PHONES (686) 28000/28593/28507 Ngkoa, FNgkaiAX: (686 ao) 283 n34/ Taaainako28425 EMAIL: [email protected] GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI Acknowledgements The report has been collectively developed by staff of the Environment and Conservation Division. Mrs Tererei Abete-Reema was the lead author with Mr Kautoa Tonganibeia contributing to Chapters 11 and 14. Mrs Nenenteiti Teariki-Ruatu contributed to chapters 7 to 9. Mr. Farran Redfern (Chapter 5) and Ms. Reenate Tanua Willie (Chapters 4 and 6) also contributed. Publication of the report has been made possible through the kind financial assistance of the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme. The front coverpage design was done by Mr. Kautoa Tonganibeia. Editing has been completed by Mr Matt McIntyre, Sustainable Development Adviser and Manager, Sustainable Economic Development Division of the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP). __________________________________________________________________________________ i Kiribati State of the Environment Report, 2000-2002 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................
[Show full text]
CBD Strategy and Action Plan
Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS PLAN (KIRITIMATI ISLAND 2005) PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT October, 2006. 1En vironment & Conservation Division- MELAD Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategies and Actions Plan 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biodiversity in this context means all terrestrial and marine ecosystems, all plants and animal species and varieties found in these ecosystems including the knowledge, uses, beliefs and language that the people of Kiribati have in relation to their ecosystems and species. Biodiversity Conservation is always considered along with sustainable use. It has been confirmed that the present state of biodiversity in the Republic of Kiribati is being degraded socially, economically, politically and even judicially. As a nation with very limited resources we just cannot afford to sit back and let this serious degradation continues. If the biodiversity is not conserved or used on a sustainable basis, and if traditional sustainable management practices, and the knowledge and relevant language are not maintained or strengthened then future development would not be able to sustain the people in the long term. The main key in the whole process is the resource owners and users at the community level who hold the long- lasting key to biodiversity conservation. The development of Kiribati National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (K-NBSAP) has been highly consultative. The process of collecting data and information has been guided by the Steering Committee, a multi-disciplinary committee that comprises of representatives from different stakeholders. The diverse representation of the Steering Committee and the collaborative incentive of the grassroots people reflected a shift towards a multi-sectoral collaboration and the need to establish stronger social and institutional infrastructure to make local community co-management actually work in practice.
[Show full text]
A Preliminary Identification of Cyanophyta/Cyanobacteria in the Brackish Milkfish Ponds of Marakei, Nikunau and Kiritimati Atolls, Republic of Kiribati
A Preliminary Identification of Cyanophyta/Cyanobacteria in the brackish milkfish ponds of Marakei, Nikunau and Kiritimati Atolls, Republic of Kiribati Temakei Tebano TheCoCare Group, P.O. Box 245, Abarao, Tarawa, Kiribati Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Common cyanophyta/cyanobacteria from the milkfish ponds of Marakei, Nikunau and Kiritimati atolls are species of Lyngbya and Spirulina. Those found on Marakei and Nikunau only include Chroococcus minutus, and species of Microcystis, Oscillatoria and Spirulina. Chroococus minor and Chroococus sp. were identified from Marakei, Nikunau and Kiritimati, respectively. Phormidium muricola (associated with Microcystis aeruginosa ) and Phormidium sp. are found on Marakei and Kiritimati, respectively. Those found on Marakei only include Anabaena, Coelosphaerium kuetzingianum (dominant), Microcystis aeruginosa (co-dominant) and Merismopedia. The taxa found on Nikunau only include Dactylococcopsis, Nodularia and Raphidiopsis . Those found on Kiritimati only include Chlorogloea (dominant) with co- dominants Aphanothece, Johannesbaptistia, Chroococcidiopsis, Dunaliella, Coccochloris and Leptolyngbya . 1 INTRODUCTION ‘Te Bokaboka ’, literally ‘mud’ was researched in 2003 Lyngbya , are being cultured in many parts of the world for (Maata, et al ., 2003) for various cyanobacterial species human food, animal feed, medicine and cosmetics (Liang, presence and nutritional components. Follow-up visits et al ., 2004; Nakargar, et al ., 2004; Shimamatsu, 2004). were made in 2005 by Tebano
[Show full text]
Closing Lines Regulations 2014
' I REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI MARINE ZONES (DECLARATION) ACT 2011 (No. 4 of2011) CLOSING LINES REGULATIONS 2014 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 14 of the Marine Zones (Declaration) Act 20 I I, the Minister for Fisheries, and Marine Resources hereby makes the following Regulations:- PART I . ) PRELIMINARY 1 Citation These Regulations may be cited as the Closing Lines Regulations 2014. 2 Interpretation "Internal Waters" means all waters on the landward side of the baseline of the territorial sea or any closing lines to the extent that those closing lines are outside the archipelagic baselines. PART II CLOSING LINES DELIMITING INTERNAL WATERS ) 3 Closing lines (1) The points between which straight closing lines are to be drawn are specified m Schedule 1, 2 and 3. ) (2) The tables in Schedule 1 specifies the closing lines for Butaritari, Marakei, Tarawa, Maiana, Abemama, Aranuka, Nonouti, Tabiteuea and Onotoa in the Gilbert Group. (3) The table in Schedule 2 specifies the closing lines for Kanton in the Phoenix Group. (4) The tables in Schedule 3 specify the closing lines for Tabuaeran (Fanning) and Kiritimati (Christmas) in the Line Group. 4 Guide to reading Schedules 1, 2 and 3 In the tables in Schedules 1, 2 and 3: (a) lines are generated by reference to points, (b) the first column sets out the point identifier and 1 . (c) the second and third columns set out the geographic coordinates for each point. PART ID GEOGRAPIDC COORDINATES POINTS 5 Geodetic framework In these Regulations, points defined by geographic coordinates are determined by reference to the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84).
[Show full text]
Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008
Pacific Studies Series Studies Pacific Pacific Studies Series Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008 After two impressively peaceful decades, there are signs of a dangerous degree of complacency in Kiribati’s view of its domestic and external affairs. Forms of cultural and political resistance to change have thus been encouraged, and these are handicapping the nation’s response to development risks. Eight leading sources of development risk confronting Kiribati are identified, and these require understanding and appropriate responses in the form of well-formulated national development strategies. Based on a thorough assessment of risks, priorities, and options by sector in the main report, 16 policy actions are recommended as keys to the full range of responses that need to be formulated to cope with development risk. About the Asian Development Bank 2008 Report KiribatiEconomic and Social ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries substantially reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two thirds of the world’s poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. Kiribati Social and Economic Report 2008 MANAGING DEVELOPMENT RISK Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org ISBN 978-971-561-777-2 Publication Stock No.
[Show full text]
Flora of the Gilbert Islands, Kiribati, Checklist by F
ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 295 FLORA OF THE GILBERT ISLANDS, KIRIBATI, CHECKLIST BY F. RAYMOND FOSBERG AND MARIE-HELENE SACHET ISSUED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 1987 FLORA OF THE GILBERT ISLAND, KIRIBATI, CHECKLIST BY F. Raymond Fosberg* and Marie-Helene Sachet The Gilbert Islands are a north-south chain of low coral islands, lying across the equator at about 172"-177" E longitude. The atolls, from north to south are Little Makin, Butaritari, Marakei, Abaiang, Tarawa, Maiana, Kuria, Aranuka, Abemama, Nonouti, Tabiteuea, Onotoa, Beru, Nikunau, Tamana, and Arorai. They are densely populated, and were under British Colonial Government until 1979, when they were granted independence, and now are the principal archipelago in the new republic of Kiribati. The following list is compiled from specimens that we have examined and from published records. Listed are all species that we have information on occurrence in the Gilbert Islands with islands listed where they have been found. We cannot vouch for the accuracy of published records. The paucity of species from many of the islands give an idea of how poorly known is the flora of the Gilbert Group. Some of the records are not supported by specimens and many of the specimens that exist are inadequate for accurate identification. New collections with better than usual data on locality, occurrence, and such features of the plants as do not show on dried specimens are greatly to be desired. A special effort should be made to collect on islands other than Tarawa, Butaritari and Onotoa. Probably most of the species growing spontaneously in the group are known, but the lists for most of the individual islands are woefully incomplete.
[Show full text]
CBD Fifth National Report
KIRIBATI FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (FINAL DRAFT) Source: ECD 2014 Significance of Kiribati Biodiversity Prepared and Compiled by Environment & Conservation Division, MELAD 30th September, 2014 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Compiling team (NBSAP Drafting Committee) acknowledges with gratitude the United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP) for effective oversight to ensure that project meets its objectives and achieves expected outcomes and providing financial supports the project. Compiler also acknowledges the assistance and management from Ministry for Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development as the National Focal point in monitoring and coordinating the project at national level to accomplish this commitment in developing the Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Much appreciation is owned to Environment and Conservation Division and Wildlife Conservation Unit in undertaking the terms and obligations in performing project-related activities through the entire duration of the project. Special thanks provided to all stakeholders of the National Biodiversity Steering Committee for their time and collaborative support in providing aligned and focused information on specific areas to all biodiversity aspects through case studies perhaps it more comprehensive due to merge of realistic information. Further appreciation is to the related projects currently employing under Biodiversity and Conservation Unit-BCU for their contributions of relevant information to the development and completion of this 5th National Report. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of Local Government Councils for their supports and also workshop participants‟ feedbacks in which are reflected in and relevant to project trends of Kiribati National Biodiversity. Without their support and dedication the completion of this report would not be possible.
[Show full text]
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT Output 3 Version 2 Enhancing Sustainable Water Security Measures to Adapt to Climate Change and Disaste
Pacific Community (SPC) Government of the Republic of Kiribati GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ALLIANCE PLUS: SCALING UP PACIFIC ADAPTATION (GCCA+ SUPA) PROJECT PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT Output 3 Version 2 Enhancing sustainable water security measures to adapt to climate change and disasters in vulnerable remote islet communities in Kiribati. October 2020 Enhancing sustainable water security measures to adapt to climate change and disasters in vulnerable remote islet communities in Kiribati 1 Project Summary This project design document (version 2) describes the framework for Kiribati’s activities under Output 3 “Scale up resilient development measures in specific sectors” of the Global Climate Change Alliance Plus - Scaling up Pacific Adaptation (GCCA+ SUPA) Project. The Output 3 activities, described here for Kiribati, will be implemented in conjunction with related activities under Output 1 “Strengthen strategic planning at national levels” and Output 2 “Enhance the capacity of sub-national government stakeholders to build resilient communities” of the GCCA+ SUPA project. Scaling up in the context of the GCCA+ SUPA Project is about enhancing, expanding, replicating and/or adding a complementary approach to existing, successful climate change adaptation interventions. Lessons learnt from previous demonstration projects will be applied to scale up sector resilience. The government of Kiribati selected water security as their focus sector for Output 3. The island of Beru has been selected as the geographical location for the project. This was confirmed during two community consultations in 2019. The overall objective of the project is building national capacity in desalination systems’ operation and maintenance. The specific objective is securing improved water resources in Beru Island.
[Show full text]