DOCSLIB.ORG

Life of Edmond Malone Editor of Shakspeare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Life of Edmond Malone Editor of Shakspeare n 3tl;aca. ^tm fork FROM THE BENNO LOEWY LIBRARY COLLECTED BY BENNO LOEWY 1854-1919 BEQUEATHED TO CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library PR 2972.M3P95 Life of Edmond Malone, editor of Shal(spea 3 1924 013 156 181 The original of tiiis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31 92401 31 561 81 .CO / ; u ^^ ^i n/ l//hgo /^-o-m ,J:y'^ n^t LIFE OF EDMOISTD MALONE, EDITOR OF SHAKSPEARE. WITH SELECTIONS EEOM HIS MANUSCEIPT ANECDOTES. BY SIK JAMES PKIOK, M.E.I.A., F.S.A., &c. ^UTHOB 6p "the LIPE OP EDJIUND BUEKE," WITH A PORTRAIT. LONDON: SMITH, ELDER & CO., 65, CORNHILL. M.DCCC.LX. j. ^ ,;) j; [^ | I [TVifi riyhl of Translation h reserved.^ TO THE ElftHT HON. THE EARL OP DERBY, K.G., SiC S(Q. &c. My Lobdj Amid the unavoidable contentions of political life, it is to be hoped that an hour may be occasionally spared to notice the pursuits of those who are less excitingly, though not unusefuUy, employed—I mean the scholar and literary inquirer, such as the subject of the following sketch. These hom's indeed cannot be many. Through life, the position of an English Statesman is peculiar. He must be, if he hopes to retain his standing in the country, pre-eminently a man of labour. Even removal from power ensures little remission from work. In office, he must originate the policy that distinguishes his country. Out of it, he is called upon to examine or to control the measures introduced by others. But in either case, by the conscientious exer- tion of large powers, he may establish a name that will die only with his country. A 2 IV That your Lordship, whether in or out of office, may receive the honours fairly earned by fearless support of the integrity of the great institutions of the State, is the sincere wish of. My Lord, Your Lordship's most obedient And most faithful servant, JAMES PRIOK. — CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. 1741—1765. Family of Malone—Trinity College—Ode on the Nuptials of George III. —Journey to England—Entered at the Middle Temple—Rev. Mr. Chetwood—His Letters 1 CHAPTER H. 1766—1769. Introduction to Dr. Johnson—Letters from Avignon—Promotion of his Father—Called to the Bar—A Love Story—Spa . .18 CHAPTER m. 1769—1777. Law Studies—Irish Duels—Death of his Father—Candidate for the Bepresentation of Trinity College—Edition of Goldsmith—Death of his Uncle—^Literature of the Stage—Removes to London—The Shakspeare Mania—Lord Charlemont—George Steevens—Letter from his Brother , 37 CHAPTER IV. 1778—1781, An Attempt to ascertain the Order in which the Plays of Sliakspeare were written—Irish Politics—Mr. Denis Daly—Sir Joshua Reynolds —Supplement to the Edition of Shakspeare't Plays by Samuel John- son and George Steevens—Hogarth's Widow—Lord Charlemont Rowley's Poems—Jephson's Count o/iVar6onne—Epilogue by Malone 58 — VI CONTENTS. CHAPTEK V. 1781—1783. Horace Walpole—Literary Club—Dr. Johnson—Lord Charlemont— Shakspeare—Steeyens—Eev. Mr. Whalley—Henry Flood . 83 CHAPTER VI. 1783—1786. Correspondence with Flood—Second Appendix to Shakspeare—^Pre- pares to become Editor—Horace Walpole—Bishop Percy—Gold- smith—Steevens—Elevation Of his Brothet to the Peerage—Boswell 108 —John Kemble—Walpole and Rousseau—Lord Charlemont . CHAPTER VH. 1786—1789. Jephson's Julia, or the Italian Lover— Prologue by Malone — Lord Charlemont—Horace Walpole — Correspondence with Rev. Mr. Davenport of Stratford—John Kemble—Pope and Warbnrton— Lady M. Wortley Montague—Visit to Burke 132 CHAPTER Vni. 1789—1791. Revision of Boswell's Johnson—Baretti—Visit to Waller's former man- sion—John Kemble—Publication of Shakspeare—^Burke—Reynolds —Mrs. Piozzi—Relique of Elizabethan Poetry—^Visit to Burke Abbe Raynal—Burke, in allusion to Hastings' Trial . , , 157 CHAPTER IX. 1792—1793. Joseph Warton—Ritson's Criticisms on Malone—Malone's Letter to Dr. Tarmer—Editors of Shakspeare—Death of Reynolds—Letter of the Poet Mason — Lord Edward Fitzgerald and Pamela — Jephson's Roman Portraits—Bishop Douglas's Anecdotes—Davenport, Stee- vens, Lord Charlemont—Prospectus of a new Edition of Shakspeare 184 CHAPTER X. 1794—1797. Jephgon's Poem and Letters—>-AnotheT tender AttacboKnt—I3eatk of BoB7ell-~-Aubrey's Papers—The Irelands Shakspeare Forg^ies— Letter of Burke—Lord Charlemont—New Tragedy by Jq)hson— Lord Otfwd—Reynolds' Mouoir and Works—Death of Burke. so9 — — CONTENTS. Vll CHAPTEE XI. 1797—1799. Correspondence—A Rapt Poet—Excursion to Brighton—Portrait of Malone by Ozias Humphrey—State of Ireland—^Earl of Clare—The Union—Prose of Dryden—^Letter of Lord Hailes—George Canning and the Literary Club—A Visitor from Stratford , . .236 CHAPTEE XII. 1799—1805. Dr. Burney—^Publication of Life and Prose Works of Dryden—R. Bell's late Edition of his Poems—Pope—Visit to Ireland in 1801 Andrew Caldwell—Mr. Wraxall and Lord Whitworth—Disap- pointed in a public appointment—^William Gilford—Sale of part of his Books—Letters to his Sister—Notices by Kev. J. Jephson Letter from GiflTord 259 CHAPTEE XIII. 1805—1810. VeniLs and Adonis (ed. 1593) Life of Shakspeare — Bishop Percy Notices of Malone, by Rev. J. Jephson—Letter to his Sister Pamphlet on the Origin of TTie Tempest—^Parliamentary Logic and Right Hon. W. G. Hamilton—Thomas Moore and Kilkenny Thea- tricals-Right Hon. W, "Windham 283 CHAPTEE XrV. 1810—1812. Proposed Life of Mason—W. Gifford—Notes upon Books—Conversa- tional Memoranda—Illness—Letter to Lady Ailesbury—^Letter to a Lady in Ireland—^Letter to Lady Sunderlin—^His Death—Character —^Person and Manners—Collections—Will—Gift of his Brother to the Bodleian Library—Letters and Papers 307 Maloxiana 333 PREFACE. He who has expended learning and industry in making known the lives and labours of others, deserves the record he bestows. It forms a debt of honour, if not of gratitude, which literary men are bound to bestow upon each other. The neglect of it is injustice to their class. And in this instance, it would be to sin against an eminent literary antiquary and critic, an amiable man, and the intimate personal friend of several of the very first characters of their time. No name is more suggestive than that of Malone whenever we take up a volume of Shakspeare, of Dryden, of the history of the stage, of Boswell, or of biographical sketches of a few eminent contemporary friends who had just passed away. Upon Pope, Aubrey, and others of a previous age, considerable labour had been expended without having its results ushered into light. While to works of more varied general information, such as the BiograpMa Dra- matical he had contributed largely in personal anecdote. Of his own career I found little. The only con- nected sketch was an article in the Gentlemans Magazine afterwards enlarged into a pamphlet, by X PREFACE. the younger Boswell, to whom in his illness he had assigned the duty of completing and issuing the en- larged edition of Shakspeare in twenty-one volumes. But this scant outline was only meant to allay the curiosity of the moment. Had that gentleman lived, no douht we should have bad a fuller account of a round of persevering studies in ancient poetic and dramatic literature by bis friend, such as few other critical antiquaries have achieved. Although I had been often impressed by the want of more satisfactory information respecting Malone, accident led to the present attempt to supply it. While at Brighton in 1856, in conver- sation with an eminent literary friend and likewise with a warm lover of letters, Mr. William Tooke, the latter mentioned having a resident friend there, the Reverend Thomas E. Eooper, a connection of the Malone family,* who possessed several of the books, letters, prints, and memoranda of Edmond, which he deemed worthy of close examination. I remembered that one of the letters of that gentleman to Bishop Percy had been quoted by me in the Life of Goldsmith^ twenty years before, stating that he bad once pos- sessed some manuscript verses of that poet, which had been so carefully folded in one of his books that they could not then or afterward be found. It imme- diately occurred to me that the lost lines might be among these memorials. Mr. Rooper was applied to, who kindly assented to the search, which however piroved vain. But the introduction led to some con- versations on Malone's career and spirit of research, •* Nephew of Lady Sunderlin, wife to the elder brother of Edmond. PREFACE. XI and eventually to the project of his life. Diligent inquiry and indifferent health have, however, post- poned its appearance longer than I had anticipated. In addition to the materials supplied by this gen- tleman, he was good enough to procure from the pre- sent Earl of Charlemont a packet of letters written to Malone by the late lord, and which Mr. Rooper had returned to the family. The letters 6f Malone to that nobleman during a correspondence of twenty years have disappeared—by some said to be lost, by others destroyed. A contingency against which there is no provision, caused the dispersion of many other papers. After the publication of Shakspeare, an agreeable evening spent by the youngier Boswell with the Malone family induced the ladies, at the suggestion of Mr. Rooper, to propose his acceptance of some memorial of their late brother. The most appropriate was deemed to be a box of papers, letters, and notes upon books, men, or miscellaneous subjects which his pursuits might turn to useful public account.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • De Búrca Rare Books
    De Búrca Rare Books A selection of fine, rare and important books and manuscripts Catalogue 141 Spring 2020 DE BÚRCA RARE BOOKS Cloonagashel, 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. 01 288 2159 01 288 6960 CATALOGUE 141 Spring 2020 PLEASE NOTE 1. Please order by item number: Pennant is the code word for this catalogue which means: “Please forward from Catalogue 141: item/s ...”. 2. Payment strictly on receipt of books. 3. You may return any item found unsatisfactory, within seven days. 4. All items are in good condition, octavo, and cloth bound, unless otherwise stated. 5. Prices are net and in Euro. Other currencies are accepted. 6. Postage, insurance and packaging are extra. 7. All enquiries/orders will be answered. 8. We are open to visitors, preferably by appointment. 9. Our hours of business are: Mon. to Fri. 9 a.m.-5.30 p.m., Sat. 10 a.m.- 1 p.m. 10. As we are Specialists in Fine Books, Manuscripts and Maps relating to Ireland, we are always interested in acquiring same, and pay the best prices. 11. We accept: Visa and Mastercard. There is an administration charge of 2.5% on all credit cards. 12. All books etc. remain our property until paid for. 13. Text and images copyright © De Burca Rare Books. 14. All correspondence to 27 Priory Drive, Blackrock, County Dublin. Telephone (01) 288 2159. International + 353 1 288 2159 (01) 288 6960. International + 353 1 288 6960 Fax (01) 283 4080. International + 353 1 283 4080 e-mail [email protected] web site www.deburcararebooks.com COVER ILLUSTRATIONS: Our front and rear cover is illustrated from the magnificent item 331, Pennant's The British Zoology.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Joseph Ritson and the Publication of Early English Literature Genevieve Theodora McNutt PhD in English Literature University of Edinburgh 2018 1 Declaration This is to certify that that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Portions of the final chapter have been published, in a condensed form, as a journal article: ‘“Dignified sensibility and friendly exertion”: Joseph Ritson and George Ellis’s Metrical Romance(ë)s.’ Romantik: Journal for the Study of Romanticisms 5.1 (2016): 87-109. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/rom.v5i1.26422. Genevieve Theodora McNutt 2 3 Abstract This thesis examines the work of antiquary and scholar Joseph Ritson (1752-1803) in publishing significant and influential collections of early English and Scottish literature, including the first collection of medieval romance, by going beyond the biographical approaches to Ritson’s work typical of nineteenth- and twentieth- century accounts, incorporating an analysis of Ritson’s contributions to specific fields into a study of the context which made his work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Essay by Julian Pooley; University of Leicester, John Nichols and His
    'A Copious Collection of Newspapers' John Nichols and his Collection of Newspapers, Pamphlets and News Sheets, 1760–1865 Julian Pooley, University of Leicester Introduction John Nichols (1745–1826) was a leading London printer who inherited the business of his former master and partner, William Bowyer the Younger, in 1777, and rose to be Master of the Stationers’ Company in 1804.1 He was also a prominent literary biographer and antiquary whose publications, including biographies of Hogarth and Swift, and a county history of Leicestershire, continue to inform and inspire scholarship today.2 Much of his research drew upon his vast collection of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century newspapers. This essay, based on my ongoing work on the surviving papers of the Nichols family, will trace the history of John Nichols’ newspaper collection. It will show how he acquired his newspapers, explore their influence upon his research and discuss the changing fortunes of his collection prior to its acquisition by the Bodleian Library in 1865. 1 For useful biographical studies of John Nichols, see Albert H. Smith, ‘John Nichols, Printer and 2 The first edition of John Nichols’ Anecdotes of Mr Hogarth (London, 1780) grew, with the assistance Publisher’ The Library Fifth Series 18.3 (September 1963), pp. 169–190; James M. Kuist, The Works of Isaac Reed and George Steevens, into The Works of William Hogarth from the Original Plates of John Nichols. An Introduction (New York, 1968), Alan Broadfield, ‘John Nichols as Historian restored by James Heath RA to which is prefixed a biographical essay on the genius and productions of and Friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Square Pegges and Round Robins: Some Mid-Eighteenth Century Numismatic Disputes
    SQUARE PEGGES AND ROUND ROBINS: SOME MID-EIGHTEENTH CENTURY NUMISMATIC DISPUTES H.E. MANVILLE BRITISH Numismatics as a science may fairly be said to have come of age in the mid-eighteenth century with early discussions among antiquarians groping toward solu- tions to some of the more vexatious questions: Who struck the ancient British coins dug up throughout southern England and what was the meaning of the brief inscriptions on some of them? Did the Anglo-Saxons coin any gold? Where were the coins of Richard I and King John? How could one differentiate the coins of William I and II; Henry II and III; Edwards I to III; and Henry IV to the early issue of Henry VII? The debates over these and other problems ranged well into the next century but gradually the path toward historical solutions grew clearer - although not without false turns and dead ends. We shall take a brief look at two of these questions and another that sprang full-blown from a flan split on a single coin and the over-fertile imagination of several mid-century antiquaries. Numismatic studies in the first quarter of the eighteenth century attempted to sort out some of the earliest English issues, as in the Numismata Anglo-Saxonica et Anglo-Danica illustrata of Sir Andrew Fountaine, printed in the Thesaurus of Dr George Hickes in 1705;1 and in Notae in Anglo-Saxonum nummos, published anonymously by Edward Thwaites in 1708.2 A chapter in Ducatus Leodiensis by Ralph Thoresby, first published in 1715, discussed coins in his private collection and was frequently referred to by other writers.3 With the Historical Account of English Money by Stephen Martin Leake, first published anonymously in 1726, a handbook solely on the coins from the Conquest became available.4 Although its original eight octavo plates illustrate fewer than seventy coins to the Restoration, Leake's work lasted through the century - later editions of 1745 and 1793 bringing it up-to-date and including additional plates.
    [Show full text]
  • John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery and the Promotion of a National Aesthetic
    JOHN BOYDELL'S SHAKESPEARE GALLERY AND THE PROMOTION OF A NATIONAL AESTHETIC ROSEMARIE DIAS TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PHD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Volume I Abstract 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 11 I Creating a Space for English Art 30 II Reynolds, Boydell and Northcote: Negotiating the Ideology 85 of the English Aesthetic. III "The Shakespeare of the Canvas": Fuseli and the 154 Construction of English Artistic Genius IV "Another Hogarth is Known": Robert Smirke's Seven Ages 203 of Man and the Construction of the English School V Pall Mall and Beyond: The Reception and Consumption of 244 Boydell's Shakespeare after 1793 290 Conclusion Bibliography 293 Volume II Illustrations 3 ABSTRACT This thesis offers a new analysis of John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery, an exhibition venture operating in London between 1789 and 1805. It explores a number of trajectories embarked upon by Boydell and his artists in their collective attempt to promote an English aesthetic. It broadly argues that the Shakespeare Gallery offered an antidote to a variety of perceived problems which had emerged at the Royal Academy over the previous twenty years, defining itself against Academic theory and practice. Identifying and examining the cluster of spatial, ideological and aesthetic concerns which characterised the Shakespeare Gallery, my research suggests that the Gallery promoted a vision for a national art form which corresponded to contemporary senses of English cultural and political identity, and takes issue with current art-historical perceptions about the 'failure' of Boydell's scheme. The introduction maps out some of the existing scholarship in this area and exposes the gaps which art historians have previously left in our understanding of the Shakespeare Gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Literary Records
    Shakespearean Biografiction: How modern biographers rely on context, conjecture and inference to construct a life of the Bard A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Arts and Humanities Brunel University By Kevin Gilvary November 2014 ii Candidate Kevin Gilvary (1955- ) B.A. (Hons), Classics, Southampton, 1976 M.A., Classics, Southampton, 1978 M.A. (Ed), Language in Education, Southampton 1996 P.G.C.E., Institute of Education, London, 1980 Doctoral Study 2007-2014 (part-time), Brunel University Supervisor 1 Professor William Leahy, School of Arts, Brunel University Supervisor 2 Dr. Sean Gaston, School of Arts, Brunel University Examiner 1 Professor Tom Betteridge, School of Arts, Brunel University Examiner 2 Professor Tom Healey, University of Sussex iii Abstract Modern biographies of William Shakespeare abound: new studies appear almost every year, each claiming new research and new insights, while affirming that there are enough records for a documentary life. In this thesis, I argue that no biography of Shakespeare is possible due to insufficient material, that most of what is written about Shakespeare cannot be verified from primary sources, and that Shakespearean biography did not attain scholarly or academic respectability until Samuel Schoenbaum’s Documentary Life (1975). The thesis therefore is concerned with demythologising Shakespeare by exposing numerous “biogra-fictions.” I begin by reviewing the history and practice of biography as a narrative account of a person’s life based on primary sources. Next I assess the very limited biographical material for Shakespeare identifying the gaps, e.g. there is no record that he spent any of his childhood in Stratford or ever attended school.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ill-Gotten Library of 'Honest' Tom Martin 1697-1771 Stoker, David
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aberystwyth Research Portal Aberystwyth University The ill-gotten library of 'Honest' Tom Martin 1697-1771 Stoker, David Published in: Property of a gentleman Publication date: 1991 Citation for published version (APA): Stoker, D. (1991). The ill-gotten library of 'Honest' Tom Martin 1697-1771. In R. Myers, & M. Harris (Eds.), Property of a gentleman: The formation, organisation and dispersal of the private library 1620-1920 (pp. 90-111). St Paul's Bibliographies. Document License Unspecified General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 09. Jul. 2020 The ill-gotten library of 'Honest Tom' Martin. The name of Thomas Martin is occasionally to be found in accounts of English book collectors of the eighteenth century, although often only as a footnote or passing reference.1 Such references usually note his unusual sobriquet, 'Honest Tom', and record that for forty years he had custody of the valuable Le Neve collection of manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan
    The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha” Peter Kirwan he disparate group of early modern plays still referred to by many Tcritics as the “Shakespeare Apocrypha” take their dubious attributions to Shakespeare from a variety of sources. Many of these attributions are external, such as the explicit references on the title pages of The London Prodigal (1605), A Yorkshire Tragedy (1608), 1 Sir John Oldcastle (1619), The Troublesome Raigne of King John (1622), The Birth of Merlin (1662), and (more ambiguously) the initials on the title pages of Locrine (1595), Thomas Lord Cromwell (1602), and The Puritan (1607). Others, including Edward III, Arden of Faversham, Sir Thomas More, and many more, have been attributed much later on the basis of internal evidence. The first collection of disputed plays under Shakespeare’s name is usually understood to be the second impression of the Third Folio in 1664, which “added seven Playes, never before Printed in Folio.”1 Yet there is some evidence of an interest in dubitanda before the Restoration. The case of the Pavier quar- tos, which included Oldcastle and Yorkshire Tragedy among authentic plays and variant quartos in 1619, has been amply discussed elsewhere as an early attempt to create a canon of texts that readers would have understood as “Shakespeare’s,” despite later critical division of these plays into categories of “authentic” and “spu- rious,” which was then supplanted by the canon presented in the 1623 Folio.2 I would like to attend, however, to a much more rarely examined early collection of plays—Mucedorus, Fair Em, and The Merry Devil of Edmonton, all included in C.
    [Show full text]
  • American Influence in Ireland
    ^American Influence in Ireland, 1760 to 1800 p until the time of the American Revolution, British expan- sion had largely been concerned with the American colonies U and Ireland. These two possessions differed greatly in two respects—namely, geography and the length of time each had been under English control. As Ireland was geographically a part of the British Isles, distance in no way lessened supervision of the English over this neighboring island. On the other hand, the American colonies were separated from the homeland by a wide expanse of ocean which increased the difficulty of any close direction of activi- ties. As for the length of time each had been under, or considered under, English jurisdiction, Ireland had been regarded as a possession of Great Britain more than four times as long as the oldest of the American plantations. In spite of these two differences, there were many similarities in the positions held by Ireland and America during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Both were considered as markets for English manufactured goods and as sources of raw materials and products of which there was a shortage in England. Neither was permitted eco- nomic development except in so far as it could be co-ordinated with English plans. The Acts of Navigation, Acts of Trade, and other legislation applied equally to both. Both countries were thought of as colonies or plantations; in each the administrative personnel was English appointed. Legislative bodies were elected to handle domes- tic matters, but they met at the desire of the governors who had been named by the*British.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Burke, Miscellaneous Writings (Select Works Vol. 4) (1874)
    Burke_0005.04 09/15/2005 09:39 AM THE ONLINE LIBRARY OF LIBERTY © Liberty Fund, Inc. 2005 http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/index.php EDMUND BURKE, MISCELLANEOUS WRITINGS (SELECT WORKS VOL. 4) (1874) URL of this E-Book: http://oll.libertyfund.org/EBooks/Burke_0005.04.pdf URL of original HTML file: http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/HTML.php?recordID=0005.04 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Burke was an English political philosopher who is often seen as laying the foundations of modern conservatism. Although he supported the American colonies in the revolution against the British crown, he strongly opposed the French Revolution, the rise of unbridled democracy, and the growing corruption of government. ABOUT THE BOOK This volume contains some of Burke’s speeches on parliamentary reform, on colonial policy in India, and on economic matters. THE EDITION USED Select Works of Edmund Burke. A New Imprint of the Payne Edition. Foreword and Biographical Note by Francis Canavan, 4 vols (Indianapolis: :Liberty Fund, 1999). COPYRIGHT INFORMATION The copyright to this edition, in both print and electronic forms, is held by Liberty Fund, Inc. FAIR USE STATEMENT This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit. http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/EBook.php?recordID=0005.04 Page 1 of 175 Burke_0005.04 09/15/2005 09:39 AM It may not be used in any way for profit.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Portraits of the Prince Ladislas-Sigismund Vasa from the Collections in Wawel Castle Re-Examined
    Rocznik Historii Sztuki, tom XXXVII PAN WDN, 2012 KATARZYNA KRZYŻAGÓRSKA-PISAREK INDEPENDENT ART HISTORIAN LONDON TWO PORTRAITS OF THE PRINCE LADISLAS-SIGISMUND VASA FROM THE COLLECTIONS IN WAWEL CASTLE RE-EXAMINED INTRODUCTION This article aims to re-evaluate the existing evidence concerning the attribution and provenance of the two portraits of the Polish Prince Ladislas-Sigismund (1595–1648), later King Ladislas IV, formerly ascribed to the Flemish master Peter Paul Rubens, and now to his workshop and his school or circle respectively. Both pictures are at present in the Wawel Castle in Cracow, and are the two most important works associated with Rubens and his studio in Poland. As both paintings originally came from British collection, so they might benefit from being reviewed from this perspective. The first one is a half-length (to the knees) portrait on long-term loan from the Metropolitan Museum, New York1, described there as workshop of Peter Paul Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund IV, King of Poland, c. 1624, oil on canvas, 49¼ ϋ 39¾ in. or 125.1 ϋ 101 cm, Inv. n. 29.100.13 (fig. 1). The second one is a full-length equestrian portrait by the school or circle of Rubens, Ladislas-Sigismund, Prince of Poland on horseback, after 1624, oil on canvas, 259 ϋ 185.5 cm, Wawel Castle, Cracow, State Collection of Art, Inv. n. 6320 (fig. 3). Later known as King Ladislas IV, the Polish Prince was the son of the King Sigismund III Vasa and his first wife Anne of Austria (1573–1598), also known as Anna Habsburg.
    [Show full text]