DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL WHITE ABALONE RECOVERY PLAN (Haliotis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL WHITE ABALONE RECOVERY PLAN (Haliotis FINAL WHITE ABALONE RECOVERY PLAN (Haliotis sorenseni) Prepared by The White Abalone Recovery Team for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources October 2008 White Abalone Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be obtained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than NMFS. They represent the official position of NMFS only after they have been signed by the Assistant Administrator. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: National Marine Fisheries Service. 2008. White Abalone Recovery Plan (Haliotis sorenseni). National Marine Fisheries Service, Long Beach, CA. ADDITIONAL COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED FROM: United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Regional Office 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200 Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 On Line: http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/ Recovery plans can be downloaded from the National Marine Fisheries Service website: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm Cover photograph of a white abalone by John Butler of the NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center. i White Abalone Recovery Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................I TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..........................................................................................................IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... V LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................XIII I. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................... I-1 A. STATUS OF THE SPECIES.........................................................................................................I-1 B. SPECIES’ DESCRIPTION AND TAXONOMY ...............................................................................I-1 C. POPULATION TRENDS AND DISTRIBUTION..............................................................................I-3 HISTORIC AND CURRENT RANGE ..................................................................................................................I-3 EXPLOITATION HISTORY ...............................................................................................................................I-4 POPULATION TRENDS....................................................................................................................................I-4 D. LIFE HISTORY/ECOLOGY .....................................................................................................I-10 REPRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................I-10 LARVAL STAGE, SETTLEMENT, AND METAMORPHOSIS...............................................................................I-11 JUVENILE STAGE.........................................................................................................................................I-12 ADULT STAGE.............................................................................................................................................I-13 E. HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................I-14 DISTRIBUTION.............................................................................................................................................I-14 ABUNDANCE AND QUALITY OF SUITABLE HABITAT ...................................................................................I-15 F. CRITICAL HABITAT...............................................................................................................I-16 G. REASONS FOR LISTING/CURRENT THREATS .........................................................................I-16 LISTING FACTORS AND CURRENT THREATS................................................................................................I-16 CURRENT THREATS.....................................................................................................................................I-21 H. CONSERVATION MEASURES.................................................................................................I-25 PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS.................................................................................................................I-25 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR WHITE ABALONE......................I-25 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR WHITE ABALONE...........................................I-25 NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR WHITE ABALONE ................................I-26 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR WHITE ABALONE ................................................I-26 MEXICAN CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR WHITE ABALONE ....................................................................I-26 I. KNOWN BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS/NEEDS..........................................................................I-27 II. RECOVERY STRATEGY .................................................................................................II-1 A. KEY FACTS AND ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................... II-1 B. PRIMARY FOCUS AND JUSTIFICATION OF RECOVERY EFFORTS ............................................ II-1 III. RECOVERY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND CRITERIA........................................... III-1 A. RECOVERY GOAL................................................................................................................III-1 B. RECOVERY OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................III-1 C. RECOVERY CRITERIA ..........................................................................................................III-2 IV. RECOVERY PROGRAM ................................................................................................IV-1 A. STEP-DOWN OUTLINE .........................................................................................................IV-1 B. NARRATIVE.........................................................................................................................IV-4 ii White Abalone Recovery Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACTION 1. ASSESS AND MONITOR SUBPOPULATIONS IN THE WILD IN COOPERATION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES, PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS AND THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT. ........................................................................................................................................... IV-4 RECOVERY ACTION 2. IDENTIFY AND CHARACTERIZE EXISTING AND POTENTIAL WHITE ABALONE HABITAT THROUGH ACOUSTIC REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY. ................................................................ IV-9 RECOVERY ACTION 3. PROTECT WHITE ABALONE POPULATIONS AND THEIR HABITAT...................... IV-10 RECOVERY ACTION 4. CONTINUE, REFINE AND EXPAND CAPTIVE PROPAGATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FOR WHITE ABALONE IN CALIFORNIA WITH THE GOAL OF ARTIFICIALLY ENHANCING POPULATIONS IN THE WILD. ............................................................................................................................................ IV-13 RECOVERY ACTION 5. PLAN AND IMPLEMENT A PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION PLAN. ............ IV-16 RECOVERY ACTION 6. SECURE FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR WHITE ABALONE RECOVERY. .................... IV-16 V. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................................. V-1 VI. LITERATURE CITED.....................................................................................................VI-1 APPENDIX A............................................................................................................................ A-1 WHITE ABALONE BROODSTOCK COLLECTION AND HOLDING PROTOCOL ................................ A-1 APPENDIX B. ........................................................................................................................... B-1 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WHITE ABALONE GENETICS MANAGEMENT PLAN.... B-1 APPENDIX C............................................................................................................................ C-1 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WHITE ABALONE DISEASE AND PARASITE MANAGEMENT PLAN ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104Th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Ashingtw On, March 24–29, 2012
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles 4-2012 Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012 National Shellfisheries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation National Shellfisheries Association, Abstr" acts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012" (2012). VIMS Articles. 524. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/524 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 231, 2012. ABSTRACTS OF TECHNICAL PAPERS Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Seattle, Washington March 24–29, 2012 231 National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Washington Abstracts 104th Annual Meeting, March 24–29, 2012 233 CONTENTS Alisha Aagesen, Chris Langdon, Claudia Hase AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE IV PILI IN VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN PACIFICOYSTERCOLONIZATION........................................................... 257 Cathryn L. Abbott, Nicolas Corradi, Gary Meyer, Fabien Burki, Stewart C. Johnson, Patrick Keeling MULTIPLE GENE SEGMENTS ISOLATED BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Protect the Pinto Abalone
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE PETITION TO LIST THE PINTO ABALONE (HALIOTIS KAMTSCHATKANA) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Center for Biological Diversity August 1, 2013 NOTICE OF PETITION Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Samuel Rauch Assistant Administrator for Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Ph: (301) 427-8000 Email: [email protected] PETITIONER The Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 100599 Anchorage, AK 99510-0599 Ph: (907) 793-8691 Date: August 1, 2013 Kiersten Lippmann Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 533(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity (“Petitioner”) hereby petitions the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS” or “NOAA Fisheries”), to list the pinto abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity (Center) is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center has nearly 475,000 members and online activists in Alaska, throughout the United States and internationally. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species and the effective implementation of the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Information
    Appendix E – Biological Resources Information Table E-1. Marine Special Status Species of the Project Region Common Name1,2 Status Habitat Potential to Occur in Marine Study Area Scientific Name Invertebrates Coastal and offshore island intertidal habitats on Not expected to occur – Intertidal habitat within MSA exposed rocky shores to about 18 feet deep lacks kelp food resources and high relief rock reef Black abalone FE where bedrock provides deep, protective refuge habitat. Local populations of black abalone Haliotis cracherodii crevices for shelter. are extremely rare and have been limited to San Diego and Channel Islands. Coastal and offshore island intertidal habitats on Not expected to occur – Intertidal and subtidal Green abalone exposed rocky shores to at least 30 feet deep habitat within MSA lacks kelp food resources and FSC Haliotis fulgens where bedrock provides deep, protective high relief rock reef refuge habitat. crevices for shelter. Coastal and offshore island subtidal habitats from Not expected to occur – Subtidal habitat within MSA Pink abalone 20 to 118 feet deep on submerged rock reefs is outside of species’ depth range and lacks kelp FSC Haliotis corrugate where bedrock provides deep, protective food resources and high relief rock reef refuge crevices for shelter. habitat. Coastal and offshore island kelp beds found on Not expected to occur – Subtidal habitat with MSA is Pinto abalone FSC outer exposed coasts in water depths from 30 to outside of species’ depth range and lacks kelp food Haliotis kamtschatkana 330 feet deep. resources and high relief rock reef refuge habitat. Coastal and offshore island subtidal habitats from Not expected to occur - Subtidal habitat within MSA White abalone 50 to 180 feet deep where bedrock provides is outside of species’ depth range and lacks kelp FE Haliotis sorenseni deep, protective crevices for shelter.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Larval, Newly Settled, and Juvenile Red Abalone (Haliotis Rufescens ) Recruitment in Northern California
    Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, 601–609, 2016. TRACKING LARVAL, NEWLY SETTLED, AND JUVENILE RED ABALONE (HALIOTIS RUFESCENS ) RECRUITMENT IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LAURA ROGERS-BENNETT,1,2* RICHARD F. DONDANVILLE,1 CYNTHIA A. CATTON,2 CHRISTINA I. JUHASZ,2 TOYOMITSU HORII3 AND MASAMI HAMAGUCHI4 1Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California Davis, PO Box 247, Bodega Bay, CA 94923; 2California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bodega Bay, CA 94923; 3Stock Enhancement and Aquaculture Division, Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute, FRA 3-27-5 Shinhamacho, Shiogama, Miyagi, 985-000, Japan; 4National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea, Fisheries Agency of Japan 2-17-5 Maruishi, Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima 739-0452, Japan ABSTRACT Recruitment is a central question in both ecology and fisheries biology. Little is known however about early life history stages, such as the larval and newly settled stages of marine invertebrates. No one has captured wild larval or newly settled red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) in California even though this species supports a recreational fishery. A sampling program has been developed to capture larval (290 mm), newly settled (290–2,000 mm), and juvenile (2–20 mm) red abalone in northern California from 2007 to 2015. Plankton nets were used to capture larval abalone using depth integrated tows in nearshore rocky habitats. Newly settled abalone were collected on cobbles covered in crustose coralline algae. Larval and newly settled abalone were identified to species using shell morphology confirmed with genetic techniques using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism with two restriction enzymes. Artificial reefs were constructed of cinder blocks and sampled each year for the presence of juvenile red abalone.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Diet and Sex-Sorting on Growth and Gonad Development in Farmed South African Abalone, Haliotis Midae
    Effect of diet and sex-sorting on growth and gonad development in farmed South African abalone, Haliotis midae A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY By DEVIN WILLIAM PHILIP AYRES December 2013 ABSTRACT Abalone, Haliotis midae, farmers in South Africa that feed formulated diets reported a periodic drop in abalone growth during periods of increased gonad development. A large drop in abalone biomass was noticed after presumed spawning events. This study was aimed to determine the effect of diet and sex-sorting on gonad development in abalone. Experiments were conducted on a commercial abalone farm from July 2012 to the end of June 2013. Isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets were formulated with two protein sources. A fishmeal and soybean meal (S-diet) diet and a fishmeal only (F-diet) diet were fed to abalone (50 - 70 g abalone-1) over 12 months. Weight and length gain, gonad bulk index (GBI), visceral index (%) and meat mass index (%) were determined monthly and seasonally. A histological study on the female gonads was conducted. This study also included an experiment to test the effect of sex-sorting (70 - 80 g abalone-1) on growth and body composition with treatments including males (M), females (F) and equal numbers of males and females (MF). Weight gain and length gain were faster in S-diet-fed abalone (RM-ANOVA, F (1, 16) = 7.77, p = 0.01; F (1, 69) = 49.9, p < 0.001, respectively). Gonad development was significantly affected by the inclusion of soybean meal with S-diet-fed abalone showing higher GBI-values than F- diet-fed abalone (RM-ANOVA, F (1, 33) = 16.22, p = 0.0003).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Red Abalone Haliotis Rufescens Stocks at San Miguel Island: Reassessing a Success Story
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 202: 303–308, 2000 Published August 28 Mar Ecol Prog Ser NOTE Enhancement of red abalone Haliotis rufescens stocks at San Miguel Island: reassessing a success story Ronald S. Burton1,*, Mia J. Tegner 2 1Marine Biology Research Division and 2 Marine Life Research Group, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0202, USA ABSTRACT: Outplanting of hatchery-reared juvenile abalone quences of such practices? How can the success of has received much attention as a strategy for enhancement of costly outplants be assessed? Such questions point to depleted natural stocks. Most outplants attempted to date conflicting needs regarding the genetic composition of appear to have been unsuccessful. However, based on genetic analyses of a population sample taken in 1992, it has outplanted organisms. Where large numbers of organ- recently been suggested that a 1979 outplanting of red isms are artificially released into a depleted popula- abalone Haliotis rufescens, on the south side of San Miguel tion, substantial changes in the genetic composition of Island (California, USA), was successful and probably sus- natural populations may occur (e.g., Tringali & Bert tained the fishery there through the 1980s. We resampled the San Miguel population in 1999 and found no genetic signa- 1998, Utter 1998). A variety of scenarios suggest that ture of the outplants. Allelic frequencies in our 1999 sample wholesale changes in genetic composition of natural closely resemble those observed in a pre-outplant 1979 south- populations may be undesirable at best and potentially ern California sample and two 1999 northern California pop- disastrous.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT BETA UNIT GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY OFFSHORE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Project No. 1602-1681 Prepared for: Beta Operating Company, LLC 111 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 1240 Long Beach, CA 90802 Prepared by: Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, California 93003 SEPTEMBER 2017 Beta Unit Geophysical Survey Biological Assessment 1602-1681 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 3 2.1 LOCATION ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Project Vessel Configuration and Mobilization .......................... 3 2.2.2 Offshore Survey Operations ...................................................... 6 2.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE ......................................................................... 13 3.0 SPECIES ACCOUNTS AND STATUS OF THE SPECIES IN THE ACTION AREA 15 3.1 INVERTEBRATES ................................................................................ 16 3.1.1 White Abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) ............................................ 16 3.2 FISH ...................................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) ............................................ 17 3.3 MARINE BIRDS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review of the Pinto Abalone - Decision
    Status Review of the Pinto Abalone - Decision TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary Sheet ............................................................................................................. 1 of 42 CR-102 ......................................................................................................................... 3 of 42 WAC 220-330-090 Crawfish, ((abalone,)) sea urchins, sea cucumbers, goose barnacles—Areas and seasons, personal-use fishery ........................................ 6 of 42 WAC 220-320-010 Shellfish—Classification .................................................................. 7 of 42 WAC 220-610-010 Wildlife classified as endangered species ....................................... 9 of 42 Status Report for the Pinto Abalone in Washington .................................................... 10 of 42 Summary Sheet Meeting dates: May 31, 2019 Agenda item: Status Review of the Pinto Abalone (Decision) Presenter(s): Chris Eardley, Puget Sound Shellfish Policy Coordinator Henry Carson, Fish & Wildlife Research Scientist Background summary: Pinto abalone are iconic marine snails prized as food and for their beautiful shells. Initially a state recreational fishery started in 1959; the pinto abalone fishery closed in 1994 due to signs of overharvest. Populations have continued to decline since the closure, most likely due to illegal harvest and densities too low for reproduction to occur. Populations at monitoring sites declined 97% from 1992 – 2017. These ten sites originally held 359 individuals and now hold 12. The average size of the remnant individuals continues to increase and wild juveniles have not been sighted in ten years, indicating an aging population with little reproduction in the wild. The species is under active restoration by the department and its partners to prevent local extinction. Since 2009 we have placed over 15,000 hatchery-raised juvenile abalone on sites in the San Juan Islands. Federal listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was evaluated in 2014 but retained the “species of concern” designation only.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Inhibition of Red Abalone (Haliotis Rufescens) Infested with an Endolithic Sponge (Cliona Sp.)
    GROWTH INHIBITION OF RED ABALONE (HALIOTIS RUFESCENS) INFESTED WITH AN ENDOLITHIC SPONGE (CLIONA SP.) By Kirby Gonzalo Morejohn A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Natural Resources: Biology May, 2012 GROWTH INHIBITION OF RED ABALONE (HALIOTIS RUFESCENS) INFESTED WITH AN ENDOLITHIC SPONGE (CLIONA SP.) HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY By Kirby Gonzalo Morejohn We certify that we have read this study and that it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully acceptable, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Sean Craig, Major Professor Date ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Tim Mulligan, Committee Member Date ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Frank Shaughnessy, Committee Member Date ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Laura Rogers-Bennett, Committee Member Date ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Michael Mesler, Graduate Coordinator Date ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Jená Burges, Vice Provost Date ii ABSTRACT Understanding the effects of biotic and abiotic pressures on commercially important marine species is crucial to their successful management. The red abalone (Haliotis rufescensis) is a commercially
    [Show full text]
  • White Abalone (Haliotis Sorenseni)
    White Abalone (Haliotis sorenseni) Five-Year Status Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo credits: Joshua Asel (left and top right photos); David Witting, NOAA Restoration Center (bottom right photo) National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region Long Beach, CA July 2018 White Abalone 5- Year Status Review July 2018 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Reviewers ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review ...................................................................... 1 1.3 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................... 3 2.2 Biological Opinions.......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Addressing Key Threats ................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Outreach Partners ............................................................................................................. 5 2.5 Recovery Coordination ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance and Persistence of Abalone (Haliotis Spp.) Along the California
    The Importance and Persistence of Abalone (Haliotis spp.) along the California Coast Dr. Stevens ENVS 190 Senior Thesis Kalli Fenk Abstract Abalone was once a common sight along the California Coast. Native tribes co-existed with the species for thousands of years. They relied on if for sustenance and they used it for tools, utensils, jewelry, trading, and regalia. In return, they took care of the abalone as if it were one of their own. When colonization devastated Native Californian culture, much of their knowledge disappeared along with the species they cared for. Abalone was highly valuable for its taste and beauty. When commercialization of abalone fisheries began their populations began to decline. Now, they face more obstacles to recovery than ever before. Current abalone stressors include, poaching, low population densities, pollution, and disease. Warming ocean temperatures also subject abalone to sea level rise and ocean acidification. I recommend a combined approach of traditional ecological management and western science be used to provide adaptive management strategies for policy makers and fisheries managers. In preserving these creatures we are inherently preserving cultural heritage and traditions of over 20 tribes in California. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………….1 Background………………………………………………………………………..2 Biology………………………………………………………………………3 Ecology……………………………………………………………………....4 Native History and Cultural Significance…………………………………...6 20th Century Population Declines…………………………………………..10 Current
    [Show full text]