DOCSLIB.ORG

Institut Za Uporedno Pravo 20 Godina Od Razbijanja Sfrj

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Institut Za Uporedno Pravo 20 Godina Od Razbijanja Sfrj INSTITUT ZA UPOREDNO PRAVO 20 GODINA OD RAZBIJANJA SFRJ INSTITUTE OF COMPARATIVE LAW 20 YEARS SINCE THE BREAKING - UP OF THE SFRY 20 GODINA OD RAZBIJANJA SFRJ 20 YEARS SINCE THE BREAKING - UP OF THE SFRY Priredili (Edited by) dr Branislava Knežić dr Jovan Ćirić Recenzenti: (Reviewers) Prof. dr Ranko N. Bulatović Prof.dr Zoran Vidojević Dr Stefanos Kareklas Prof. dr Đorđe Đorđević Izdavač (Publisher) Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, Terazije 41, tel. 32 33 213 www.comparativelaw.info Za izdavača (for the publisher) dr Jovan Ćirić Štampa GORAGRAF, Beograd Tiraž 300 primeraka ISBN 978-86-80059-73-0 20 GODINA OD RAZBIJANJA SFRJ 20 YEARS SINCE THE BREAKING - UP OF THE SFRY Priredili (Edited by) dr Branislava Knežić dr Jovan Ćirić INSTITUT ZA UPOREDNO PRAVO Beograd, 2011 INSTITUTE OF COMPARATIVE LAW Belgrade, 2011 5 SADRŽAJ REČ UREDNIKA . 9 Срђа Трифковић ПОСТМОДЕРНИ МАКИЈАВЕЛИЗАМ: ЗАПАД И СРБИ, 1991-2011. 13 Јелена Гускова СТАВ СРБА ПРЕМА МИРОВНИМ ПЛАНОВИМА ИЗ ПРВЕ ПОЛОВИНЕ 90-ИХ ГОД. XX ВЕКА . 33 Svetozar Livada SAMOSKRIVLJENA NEZRELOST ELITE VLASTI U KORIST POVIJESNE NESREĆE VLASTITIH NARODA . 85 Слободан Вуковић РАЗБИЈАЊЕ ДРУГЕ ЈУГОСЛАВИЈЕ УВОД У „ХУМАНИТАРНЕ“ ИНТЕРВЕНЦИЈЕ . 105 Nikola Popović KADA JE POČELO RAZBIJANJE SFRJ? . 133 Miroslav Svirčević APORIJA USTAVA IZ 1974. 145 David Đ. Dašić NEKI UNUTRAŠNJI I MEĐUNARODNI ASPEKTI KRIZE I RASPADA JUGOSLAVIJE. 159 6 Jovan Ćirić PRVI UDARAC . 183 Branislava Knežić NA ROĐAČKOJ METI . 213 Vladimir Čolović MEĐUNARODNOPRAVNI KONTINUITET NA TERITORIJI JUGOSLAVIJE U PERIODU OD 1941-1945. I NAKON DRUGOG SVETSKOG RATA . 227 Oliver Bačanović Nataša Jovanova TRANZICIJA, MLADI I KRIMINALITET. 253 Isidora Beraha, Sonja Đuričin STANJE SRPSKE PRIVREDE U POREĐENJU SA BIVŠIM REPUBLIKAMA DVADESET GODINA NAKON RASPADA SFRJ. 275 Dejan Šuput SISTEM SPORTA U DRŽAVAMA BIVŠE SFRJ . 305 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS WORD OF THE EDITOR . 11 Srdja Trifković POSTMODERN MACHIAVELLIAN: WEST AND SERBS, 1991-2011 . 31 Jelena Guskova THE ATTITUDE OF SERRBS TO PEACEMAKING PLANS IN THE NINETIES . 57 Svetozar Livada SELF-BLAMED IMMATURITY OF GOVERNING ELITE IN FAVOUR OF THEIR OWN NATION HISTORICAL MISFORTUNE . 104 Slobodan Vuković BREAKUP OF THE SECOND YUGOSLAVIA AS AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HUMANITARIAN INTERVANTIONS . 131 Nikola Popović WHEN DID THE BREAK-UP OF SOCIAL FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA START? . 143 Miroslav Svirčević APORIA OF THE YUGOSLAV CONSTITUTION FROM 1974. 157 8 David Dašić SOMES OF THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF THE CRISIS AND BREAKUP OF YUGOSLAVIA . 181 Jovan Ćirić THE FIRST HIT (WHO HIT FIRST?) . 211 Branislava Knežić ON COUSIN`S TARGET. 226 Vladimir Čolović INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONTINUITY IN THE TERRITORY OF YUGOSLAVIA IN THE PERIOD 1941-1945 AND AFTER THE WORLD WAR II . 252 Oliver Bačanović Nataša Jovanova TRANSITION, YOUTH AND CRIME . 273 Isidora Beraha Sonja Đuričin ECONOMIC POSITION OF SERBIA IN COMPARASION TO THE ECONOMIES OF OTHER FORMER REPUBLICS TWO DECADES AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF SFRY . 303 Dejan Šuput SPORTS SYSTEMS OF THE STATES DERIVED FROM FORMER YUGOSLAVIA . 329 9 REČ UREDNIKA Dana 19. septembra 2011. godine beogradska „Politika“ je prenela tekst riječkog „Novog lista“, pod naslovom „Hrvatskoj bi- lo bolje u Jugoslaviji“. Da li bi se to moglo reći i za sve druge države na prostoru bivše SFRJ? Mnogo takvih i drugih sličnih pi- tanja moglo bi se postaviti, danas 20 godina nakon što je razbije- na. U svakom slučaju mišljenja smo da ima sasvim dovoljno raz- loga da se problematici „20 godina od razbijanja SFRJ“ posveti jedna ovakva knjiga. Da li smo i koliko uspeli u nameri da temu razbijanja SFRJ u potpunosti rasvetlimo, drugo je pitanje, jer izgleda da i tada, kao i sada ono što bismo svi trebali da znamo o razbijanju SFRJ, ipak ne znamo. Neko je daleko stariji, a posebno mudriji, već poodavno re- kao da kada se Evropa razboli lek pokušava da nađe na Balkanu. Istorijsko iskustvo svedoči da je jedna ozbiljna zemlja nečijom nedoraslom (zlo)voljom uzdrmana i iščupana iz korena onih koje je života koštala. Kao začetnici ideje ove Knjige želeli smo da okupimo što više različitih mišljenja i viđenja svega onoga što se događalo na području bivše nam domovine. Iako se ponekad čini da se odnosi među „bivšom braćom“, danas „otkravljuju“ i normalizuju, ipak ni- smo uspeli da privolimo i one koji, možda, drugačije misle o svemu, da nam prezentuju svoje viđenje stvari. 10 REČ UREDNIKA / WORD OF THE EDITOR Autori koji su se odazvali našem pozivu, po sopstvenom izboru, ličnim stavovima i stilom obojili su zadati naslov i svojim dragoce- nim radovima razbistravali su i ono „đe se pamet najviša zaglavi...“. Reči autora su, zaista, bile daleko starije od našeg mišljenja i priređivačkog odnosa prema njima i nadamo se da nam niko ne može zameriti na nameri da svakome damo priliku da slobodno kaže šta misli o jednoj nesumnjivo velikoj i tragičnoj temi kao što je „20 godina od razbijanja SFRJ“ kao i o mnogim pojavama, koje su tesno povezane sa onim što se događalo u proteklih dvadeset godi- na. Racionalnosti, smirenosti i spretnosti tumačenja lomnosti jedne zemlje za nas, i nadamo se čitaoca, imaju vrednost retkosti. Bilo kako bilo, očekujemo razumevanje čitaoca, pa i kritiku nas i autora, kao i recenzenata, ovog i ovakvog Zbornika. Recenzent- skom maru i autorskom odzivu našem pozivu dugujemo izraze du- boke zahvalnosti. U Beogradu, septembra 2011. B. K. i J. Ć. 11 WORD OF THE EDITOR On September 19th, 2011 the Belgrade newspaper „Politika“ transmitted the text of the „Novi list“ from Rijeka under the title „Hrvatskoj bilo bolje u Jugoslavija“ („For Croatia it was better in Yugoslavia“ – rem. of the translator). Could we say that also for all the other states in the region of the former SFRY (Socialist Federa- tive Republic of Yugoslavia – rem. of the translator)? Many such and other similar questions could be posed today, 20 years after the SFRY has been disrupted, broken-up. In any case, our opinion is that there are quite enough reasons to dedicate a book like this to the theme „20 years since the breaking –up of the SFRY“. Another question is if we have, and how much, succeeded in the intention to elucidate totally the theme of the breaking – up of the SFRY as it seems that then, like now, we nevertheless do not know what we all should about the breaking – up of the SFRY. Somebody by far much older, and especially wiser, said already a long time ago and by improper remembrance that when Europe falls ill it tries to find the medicine on the Balkans. The historic experience testifies that one serious country has been rocked and uprooted from those who gave their lives for it by somebody's immature (ill-)will. As the initiators of the idea for this book, we wanted to gather as many different opinions and visions of all what was happening on the area of our former fatherland as possible. Although it sometimes 12 REČ UREDNIKA / WORD OF THE EDITOR seems that the relationships between the „former brothers“ today are „thawing“ and getting normal, we nevertheless did not succeed to inveigle also those who, maybe, have a completely different opinion about everything, to present us their vision of the things. The authors who have answered our invitation, have stained per their own choice, personal attitudes and style the defined theme and cleared even that „where the highest mind gets stuck...“ with their precious works. The words of the authors were, really, by far older than our opi- nion and we hope that nobody can complain about our intention to give everybody the chance to express freely his/her opinion about an undoubtedly big and tragic theme like „20 years since the breaking – up of the SFRY“ as well as about many phenomenons which are closely related to what was happening in the last twenty years. The rationalities, calmnesses and agilities of the interpretations of the fragility of one country have for us, and hopefully for the re- ader, the value of a rarity. Anyway, we expect understanding from the reader, even also a critic of us and the authors, as well as the reviewers of this and such memoir. We owe expressions of deep gratefulness to the reviewers' diligence and authors' response. In Belgrade, September 2011 B. K. and J. Ć. 13 Срђа Трифковић ПОСТМОДЕРНИ МАКИЈАВЕЛИЗАМ: ЗАПАД И СРБИ, 1991-2011. Проблем односа западног света према Србима током протекле две деценије – проблем не само Косова и Метохије и будућности Ре- публике Српске, Хага или евроинтеграција, већ односа у једном сло- женијем смислу – није плод српских идиосинкразија које су у раско- раку са јасно дефинисаним западним принципима. Тај проблем је, напротив, плод својеврсне патологије постмодерног Запада који од тих принципа систематски одступа. Кључне речи: принципи западне политике; анти-хришћански од- нос према Србима; српско неразумевање, Макијавелизам; Косово – Република Српска * * * Тон западне политике на Балкану током протекле две деце- није, а поготову подршка водећих НАТО сила независном Ко- сову и централизованој Босни и Херцеговини под муслиман- ском доминацијом, не могу се схватити ван контекста вредно- сног система доминантних политичких, медијских, академских и културних елита данашње западне Европе и северне Америке. Поглед на свет тих елита заснива се на патолошкој негацији вредности и легитимитета сопственог – европског, хришћан- ског, „западног'“ – историјског и цивилизацијског наслеђа. Ин- 14 Срђа Трифковић систирање на афирмацији „Другога“ у име постмодерних идео- лошких норми попут мултикултурализма и антидискриминаци- онизма, попримило је карактер секуларне религије која не сме да буде подвргнута критичком испитивању. Одбацивање историјских, културних, духовних и цивили- зацијских аргумената за останак Косова и Метохије у саставу Србије од стране западних елита изискује анализу њиховог систематског и дугорочног покушаја да сопствена друштва претворе у постнационални меланж култура, раса и веровања. У оба случаја главни добитник је савремени џихад, инхерент- но агресивни, демографски експлозиван и идеолошки крут исламистички покрет који има глобални карактер и светско- историјски значај.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yugoslav Experiment 1948-1974
    THE YUGOSLAV EXPERIMENT 1948-1974 DENNISON RUSINOW THE YUGOSLAV EXPERIMENT 1948-1974 The Royal iNsnruTE of International Affairs is an unofficial body which promotes the scientific study of international questions and does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. The Institute and its Research Committee gratefully acknowledge the com ments and suggestions of the following who read the manuscript: Stephen Clissold, Professor Hugh Seton-Watson and Professor Marcus Wheeler. THE YUGOSLAV EXPERIMENT 1948-1974 BY DENNISON RUSINOW Publishedfor — the Royal Institute ofInternational Affairs, London, by the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley and Los Angeles ISBN: 0-520-03730-8 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 76-20032 Copyright ® 1977 by Royal Institute of International Affairs, London First Paperback Printing 1978 Printed in the United States of America 123456789 To Alison and Tamara, the only good reasons^ and to Mary^ the reasonfor reasons PREFACE For more than three decades Yugoslavia has attracted and sustained a level of international interest disproportionate to the size and economic and military importance of a backwater Balkan State with a population of 20 million. Initially inspired by the romantic and dramatic Yugoslav resistance to Axis occupation during World War II, this interest has since 1948 been focused on a remarkable and still unfinished voyage of exploration, otherwise known as 'the Yugoslav road to socialism*, which is the subject of this book. The proclaimed destination may not exist on any of the headings which have been tried; the vessel or its navigators may ultimately prove inadequate to the enterprise; or the landfall, if one is ever made, may prove to be only a small, rather ordinary and sadly familiar island still half a world away from the shores of Communist Cathay.
    [Show full text]
  • Searchable PDF Format
    - !-l t(xt0 trA(i'l's Atr()U'I' YUGOSLAVIA (t) 4tlr eclitiorr a-\ l2tl pagcs rl -30 lrltck.unrl-wlriIc photographs - 3 rrraps - Lurrgrr:tgt's: tinglish, French, -) (icrrnitn, I\rssian, Spanish 'l'lris b<xrk c:ontuins the basic facts E- llrorrt Yrrgttslavia GT]o(;I{APIIY, I{ISTORY, r-\ w-) S ATF, OR.GANIZATION, AA IIOREIGN POLICY, WORKTJRS' SELF-MANAGEMENT, -t INDT]STRY, TRANSPORT, ACRICULTURE, a EDUCATION, ARTS, E- SOCIAL INSURANCE, (J TOURISM, SPORT IOOO FACTS ABOUT YUGOST.AVIA r= O waRszAwA .^*-h-;; c_-?6 =i PUBLISHER IZDAVACKI ZAVOD "IUGOSLAVI.I A. Beograd, Nemamjiaa 34 FACTS ABOUT YI]GOSIAYIA COUNTRY AND POPULATION GEOGRAPHIC AREA POSITION The Social srt Federral Rerpub,lic of y,urgoslavia lies, u,ith its greater part (g0 percent) in the Balkan peninsula, Southeast Europe, and, with a smaller part (20 percent) in Central Europe. Since its southwestern ,regions occupy a long length of the Adriati,c coastal be1t, it is b,oth a continental and a maritime country. The country,s extreme points extend from 40o 57' to 460 53, N. lat. and from 13" 23' to 23o 02' E. l"ong. It is consequently pole, closer to the Equator than to the North and and Italy. it has the Central European Standard time. POPULATION AND BOUNDARIES ITS NATIONAL STRUCTURE Yugoslavia is bounded by several states and the sea. On the land side, it borders on seven states: Austria and Hungary on the north, Rumania on the northeast, Bulgaria on the east, Greece on the south, Albania on the southwest and Italy on the northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Zbornik Radova Collected Papers
    UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU PRAVNI FAKULTET U NOVOM SADU UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD FACULTY OF LAW NOVI SAD (SERBIA) ZBORNIK RADOVA COLLECTED PAPERS XLVIII 2 (2014) NOVI SAD, 2014. ZRPFNS, Godina XLVIII Novi Sad, br. 2 (2014) UDK 3 1 PRAVNI FAKULTET U NOVOM SADU Dosadašnji glavni urednici: Prof. dr Vladimir Kapor (1966), prof. dr Nikola Vorgić (1967–1968), prof. dr Miloš Stevanov (1969–1973), prof. dr Borivoje Pupić (1974–1976), prof. dr Milijan Popović (1977–1983), prof. dr Stanko Pihler (1984–1988), prof. dr Momčilo Grubač (1989–1991), prof. dr Jovan Munćan (1992–1997), prof. dr Milijan Popović (1998–2003), prof. dr Rodoljub Etinski (2004–2007), prof. dr Dragiša Drakić (2008–2013). Za izdavača Prof. dr Ranko Keča dekan Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu Upravnik Centra za izdavačku delatnost Prof. dr Ljubomir Stajić Glavni i odgovorni urednik Prof. dr Slobodan Orlović Članovi Uredništva: Prof. dr Ljubomir Stajić, prof. dr Damjan Korošec (Slovenija), prof. dr Wilhelm Brauneder (Austrija); prof. dr Tamás Prugberger (Mađarska), prof. dr Serge Regourd (Francuska), prof. dr Gérard Marcou (Francuska), prof. dr Heinz Mayer (Austrija), prof. dr Peter Mader (Austrija), prof. dr Branislav Ristivojević, mr Radmila Dabanović, Marko Knežević Menadžer časopisa Luka Baturan Sekretarijat Uredništva Dr Vladimir Marjanski, dr Dragana Ćorić, dr Bojan Tubić, Marko Knežević, Milana Pisarić, Nataša Rajić, Uroš Stanković, Sandra Samardžić, Luka Baturan, Cvjetana Cvjetković, Stefan Samardžić, Ratko Radošević Od aprila 2008. godine Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu pod nazivom Proceedings of Novi Sad Faculty of Law je u punom tekstu dostupan u EBSCO bazi Academic Search Complete. Od juna 2010. godine kompletan tekst svih brojeva Zbornika radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu pod nazivom Zbornik radova uvršćen je u kolekciju: International & Non-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Удк 94(497.1)”195/196” 323(497.1
    УДК 94(497.1)”195/196” 323(497.1)”1966” Milan PILJAK, М. А. Power Game IN Tito’S YUgoslavia: Conundrum OF Aleksandar Ranković’S Overthrow from Power* Abstract: Article strives to explain the ousting of Aleksandar Ranković through rivalry within the League of Communists of Yu- goslavia that originated from both Party and state crises. Reforms adopted in 1950s, made Yugoslavia more difficult to control from the federal level, since republican and other centers saw their op- portunity in self-management to expand power on account of the federal government. Whole process is observed from the stand- point of a struggle for power within the LCY, and the state and question how much Yugoslavia needed to be centralized. Tito put in a tremendous effort to create an image that Ranković’s over- throw was in fact a continuum in Party’s policy, neglecting the facts that they had been the closest associates till 1963. Ranković was falsely accused for deviations of the Security apparatus in an attempt to take power by force. Hence, this article tries to reveal structuralKey words: reasons for his downfall. LCY unity, Party “rift”, Aleksandar Ranković, Brioni plenum 1966 1 Quite a long time after the work of Branko Petranović in historiography, no serious efforts were made in presenting a2 different picture of the Brioni Plenum apart from the official3 Party allegations where the number two official, Aleksandar Ranković Marko was stripped of all his posts under the Traditionaccusation and Transformation – Historical Heritage and National Identity in Serbia in 20th Century * This article has been written within the framework of the scholarly project Istorija Jugoslavije, (№ 47019), financed byHrvatska the Ministry u Jugoslaviji of Education, 1945–1991: Science od and zajedništva Technological do razlaza, Development Republic of Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Srđan CVETKOVIĆ Institute for Contemporary History [email protected]
    УДК 94(497.1)”196” 323(497.1)”196/197” 32:929 Ранковић А. Оригиналан научни рад Примљен: 16. 5. 2016. Прихваћен: 16. 1. 2017. Srđan CVETKOVIĆ Institute for Contemporary History [email protected] Fall of Aleksandar Ranković and Condemnation of “Rankovićism”*1 Abstract: This study examines the circumstances which lead to the purge of Aleksandar Ranković, the longtime person “Number one” in the State Security’s apparatus. The study also analyses the impact it had on the future events in the history of Yugoslavia. The political fall of Aleksandar Ranković coincided with the beginning of the process of redeining relations between the member-states of the Federation sparkling suspicions that the two events were closely interlinked. Moreover, Aleksandar Ranković was posthu- mously proclaimed Serbian nationalist. In this study, we also ana- lyse what affairs during the Ranković’s ouster can be linked to his name; how much truth there is in the accusations of his involve- ment in the wire-tapping of the Yugoslav top level political lead- ers’ affair and what were his ambitions to become one of them. What implications did these events have on the wider scope of the state’s political actions? Key words: Aleksandar Ranković, UDBA (State Security Adminis- tration), communism, Serbia, political purges, party purges, Josip Broz Tito According to the common view of historians, Aleksandar Rank- ović’s fall from power was the result of his opposed efforts to the pro- * This article has been written within the framework of the scholarly project: Serbian Society in the Yugoslav State in the 20th century: Between Democracy and Dictatorship (№ 177016), inanced by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of Vojvodinian Leadership on Re-Opening the Issue of the Relationship Between Sr Serbia and Sap Vojvodina in 1981
    doi: 10.19090/i.2016.27.258-273 UDC: 94(497.1)”1981” ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER Received: 27 April 2016 Accepted: 16 Jun 2016 SLOBODAN BJELICA University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of History [email protected] VIEWS OF VOJVODINIAN LEADERSHIP ON RE-OPENING THE ISSUE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SR SERBIA AND SAP VOJVODINA IN 1981 Abstract: In the early 1980s, after the death of the long-time President Josip Broz Tito, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia slowly began to fall into a deep political and economic crisis. One of the most important aspects of this crisis was the crisis between the republic and the province, whose relationship was based on the 1974 Constitution. In terms of relations of the Socialist Republic of Serbia and the Socialist Autonomous Province of Vojvodina the degradation started 1981, when in the wake of the Albanian demonstrations (i.e. the counterrevolution in Kosovo), the republic leadership demanded a redefinition of the relations within Serbia, i.e. the change of the Constitution. Responding to the specific criticism from Belgrade, Vojvodinian leaders formed a working group which, in eight comprehensive studies, gave their view of the normative and economic problems of Serbia and Vojvodina. Keywords: autonomy, Vojvodina, Yugoslavia, Kosovo, Serbia. n 1981, when Vojvodina lost both protagonists of the great dispute over the autonomy from the 1960s – Jovan Veselinov and Stevan Doronjski, a major political crisis started I and it did not end until the final disintegration of the country. The crisis began in March with massive Albanian demonstrations in Kosovo under the slogan ‘Kosovo – Republic’, so in April after the riots and casualties the Yugoslav leadership was forced to introduce a state of emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Shadow Debate? Belgrade, Yugoslavia Kulturkampf Narch 16, 1963 Nr
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS AS -9 Birc aninova 28b or Shadow Debate? Belgrade, Yugoslavia Kulturkampf Narch 16, 1963 Nr. Richard H. Nolte Institute of Current World iffairs 366 Nadison Avenue, New York 17, N.Y. Dear Nr. Nolte: The struggle over culture in Yugoslavia continues, with none of us any the wiser as to its origin, purpose, seriousness or even- tual outcome. Narshal Tito, following his speech to the People's Youth (see AS-8), elaborated his views still further in a meeting with leading Yugoslav journalists. The discussion at various prty forums has gathered momentum since then, and there have been some tangible consequences in actual cultural policy. But the discussion itself and its political context have raised more questions than they have answered. President Tito met with the Executive Committee of the Yugo- slav Press Association on February 6, but the edited text of his re- marks was not released until eight days later. It was officially reported that the interview had been at the journalists' request; and it was rumored, quite unofficially, that they had come partly to complain of excessive interference from on high in their day-to- day work-- interference which, they felt, had on occasion made them look rather foolish. One may cite at least two such occasions. The first concerned the repression of Communists by the Iraqi revoluti- onaries, which the Yugoslav press failed to report for almost a week after Western wire services had begun telling the story: only after the Soviet press, equally inhibited, had picked up the Western reports were the Yugoslav papers permitted to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authenticity of the Founding of Tito’S Yugoslavia As a Federation
    Sergej Flere1 UDC 94(497.1)"1943" University of Maribor Original scientific paper Faculty of Philosophy Submitted 06/11/2018 Maribor (Slovenia) Revised 29/12/2018 Accepted 08/01/2019 doi: 10.5937/socpreg52-19443 THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE FOUNDING OF TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA AS A FEDERATION Abstract: It is widely accepted that Tito’s Yugoslavia was institutionally founded at AVNOJ, namely the Second Session of the Anti-Fascist Council of National Liberation of Yugoslavia, held on November 29, 1943 in Bosnian woods. At the assembly, a Decree concerning the federal organization was to be adopted. The Decree contained principles of Yugoslavia’s future organization (six republics, along with the parity of republics and nationalities). Neither scholars nor politicians, in the former country and abroad, have questioned the veracity of the assertion that the Decree was adopted at this Session. The Decree was instrumental in the communist drive to impose a federation and communism, when confronted with pre-war politicians in the Transitional and Constitu- tional Assemblies, in 1945 and 1946. The communists were able to claim that federalism had already been instituted. Later, the Decree was widely invoked during Tito's Yugosla- via, both by those who advocated greater ''states' rights'' and by those claiming that Yugo- slavia was already too decentralized. On closer inspection, it is more than questionable whether such constitutional De- cree could have been adopted in such a situation. Many issues the decree governs were matters of contention and final decision making within AVNOJ after the Second Session (and in 1945). Technicalities also point to the Decree not being adopted at that moment, but in an informal situation by the communist leaders at a later date, however, not later than February 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforme, Jugoslavija – Slovenija: 1968–1988
    SLOVENIJA – JUGOSLAVIJA, KRIZE IN REFORME 1968/1988 Uredil ZDENKO ČEPIČ Ljubljana 2010 ZBIRKA VPOGLEDI 2 SLOVENIJA – JUGOSLAVIJA, KRIZE IN REFORME 1968/1988 Urednik: dr. Zdenko Čepič Izdajatelj: Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino Ljubljana, Republika Slovenija Zanj dr. Damijan Guštin Recenzenta: dr. Jurij Perovšek, dr. Egon Pelikan Lektoriranje: Tine Logar Prevodi povzetkov: Borut Praper Računalniški prelom: Franc Čuden, Medit d.o.o. Tisk: Grafika-M s.p. Naklada: 400 izvodov CIP – Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 94(497.1)"1968/1988"(082) 94(497.4)"1968/1988"(082) SLOVENIJA - Jugoslavija, krize in reforme 1968/1988 / uredil Zdenko Čepič ; [prevodi povzetkov Borut Praper]. - Ljubljana : Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, 2010. - (Zbirka Vpogledi ; 2) ISBN 978-961-6386-24-1 1. Čepič, Zdenko 250465280 Slovenija – Jugoslavija, krize in reforme 1968/1988 KAZALO Zdenko Čepič, Krize – reforme, Jugoslavija – Slovenija: 1968–1988 .............. 5 Crises – Reforms, Yugoslavia – Slovenia: 1968–1988 Peter Vodopivec, Od poskusov demokratizacije (1968–1972) do agonije in katastrofe (1988–1991) .............................................................. 13 From Democratisation Attempts (1968–1972) to Agony and Catastrophe (1988–1991) Neven Borak, Jugoslavija med integracijo in dezintegracijo ........................... 29 Yugoslavia Between Integration and Disintegration Zdenko Čepič, Jugoslovanske reforme v šestdesetih letih ............................... 41 The 1960s Yugoslav Reforms Jerca Vodušek Starič, Brionski
    [Show full text]
  • Slov-Prehled2-Studie-01.Indd
    101 | 2015 Slovanský přehled číslo 2 STUDIE Between the Nation and Socialism in Yugoslavia. The Debate between Dobrica Ćosić and Dušan Pirjevec in the 1960s Agustín CoSovschI University of San Martin, Argentina and Écoles des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, France Between the Nation and Socialism in Yugoslavia. The Debate between Dobrica Ćosić and Dušan Pirjevec in the 1960s From a perspective rooted in conceptual history, the following article stu­ dies the transformations of Yugoslav political discourse from the end of World War II until the 1960s, in order to later analyze the famous debate held by the Serbian writer Dobrica Ćosić and the Slovene critic Dušan Pir­ jevec regarding cultural cooperation between the Yugoslav republics. By examining the transition from a centralist model to a more decentralized model based on the conceptual paradigm of selfmanagement and the conse­ quences of such a transformation on the official approach towards the na­ tional question, the text aims at taking a closer look to the development of the new political language of Yugoslav communism and its effects on the political and intellectual debates of the time. Key words: Yugoslavia, nationalism, Marxism The 1960s were thriving times in Yugoslavia. The country enjoyed the first transfor­ mations of selfmanagement decentralization, strongly backed up by a favorable po­ 101 | 2015 41 A. Cosovschi sition in the context of Cold War, a significant economic growth and a remarkable cultural bloom encouraged by the “struggle of opinions” established after the breakup with Stalin, which created an environment for freedom of thought and critique, an exceptional feat in the communist world.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective
    helsinki committee for human rights in serbia YugoslaviA from a histORical perspective Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia Yugoslavia from a Historical Perspective Belgrade, 2017 YUGOSLAVIA FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Publisher Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia For the publisher Sonja Biserko Copyright © Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, 2017. Editorial Board Latinka Perović Drago Roksandić Mitja Velikonja Wolfgang Hoepken Florian Bieber Proofreading Sheila Sofrenović Cover design and typesetting Ivan Hrašovec Photos and illustrations on the cover • Youths Day, Maribor, 1961. photo: wikipedia.org • Vukovar 1991, photo by Željko Jovanović • Map of SFRY, www.jugosloveni.info Illustration on the back cover and first page of the book • Pablo Picasso, poster for the movie Neretva, 1969. Printed by Delfimedia Circulation 500 This book has been published thanks to the support provided by the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Federal Republic of Germany CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији – Народна библиотека Србије, Београд ISBN 978-86-7208-208-1 COBISS.SR-ID 240800780 Contents Publisher’s Note Why this project 9 Foreword YU-History: A multi-perspective historical account 13 Introduction T e multi-perspectivity of (post)Yugoslav histories 17 I – MANIFOLD YUGOSLAVISMS – HOW YUGOSLAV NATIONS ENTERED INTO YUGOSLAVIA Drago Roksandić Yugoslavism before the creation of Yugoslavia 29 II – YUGOSLAV EXPERIENCE FROM NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES husnija Kamberović The Bosniaks,
    [Show full text]
  • Jugoslavija U Istorijskoj Perspektivi Jugoslavija U Istorijskoj Perspektivi
    Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji JugoslavijA u istorijskoj perspektivi Jugoslavija u istorijskoj perspektivi Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji Jugoslavija u istorijskoj perspektivi Beograd, 2017 JUGOSLAVIJA U ISTORIJSKOJ PERSPEKTIVI Izdavač Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji Za izdavača Sonja Biserko Copyright © Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava u Srbiji, 2017. Uređivački odbor Latinka Perović Drago Roksandić Mitja Velikonja Wolfgang Hoepken Florian Bieber Recenzenti Dubravka Stojanović Vera Katz Hrvoje Klasić Lektura Seška Stanojlović Grafičko oblikovanje i slog Ivan Hrašovec Fotografije i ilustracije na naslovnoj strani • Dan mladosti u Mariboru, 1961. foto: wikipedia.org • Vukovar 1991, foto: Željko Jovanović • Mapa SFRJ, www.jugosloveni.info Ilustracija na zadnjoj strani korica i prvoj strani knjige • Pablo Pikaso, plakat za film Neretva, 1969. Izdavanje knjige, u okviru celog Štampa: Delfimedia projekta, podržalo je Ministarstvo Tiraž: 3000 inostranih poslova Savezne Republike Nemačke CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији – Народна библиотека Србије, Београд ISBN 978-86-7208-207-4 COBISS.SR-ID 236922892 Sadržaj Reč izdavača Zašto ovaj projekat . 9 Predgovor Jugoslavija iz različitih uglova. 12 Uvod Multi perspektivnost (post)jugoslovenskih istorija . 15 I — VIŠESTRUKA JUGOSLAVENSTVA – KAKO JUGOSLAVENSKI NARODI ULAZE U JUGOSLAVIJU Drago Roksandić Jugoslavenstvo prije Jugoslavije . .27 II — JUGOSLOVENSKO ISKUSTVO U NACIONALNIM PERSPEKTIVAMA Husnija Kamberović Bošnjaci, Hrvati i Srbi u Bosni i Hercegovini i u Jugoslaviji U stalnom procepu. 57 Šerbo Rastoder Crna Gora i Crnogorci u Jugoslaviji Gubitak državnosti i njena obnova. 82 Ivo Goldstein Hrvatska i Hrvati u Jugoslaviji Suprot stavlja nje centralizmu. .115 Ljubica Jančeva i Aleksandar Litovski Makedonija i Makedonci u Jugoslaviji Uspostavljanje sopstvenog identiteta. 149 Božo Repe Slovenija i Slovenci u Jugoslaviji Zašto su ušli i zašto su izašli: tri slovenačke odluke o jugoslovenstvu.
    [Show full text]