DOCSLIB.ORG

Aspects of Newtonianism in Rameau's Génération Harmonique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 10-24-2014 12:00 AM Aspects of Newtonianism in Rameau’s Génération harmonique Abigail Shupe The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Kevin Mooney The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Music A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Abigail Shupe 2014 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Musicology Commons, and the Music Theory Commons Recommended Citation Shupe, Abigail, "Aspects of Newtonianism in Rameau’s Génération harmonique" (2014). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 2507. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2507 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aspects of Newtonianism in Rameau’s Génération harmonique (Thesis Format: Monograph) by Abigail Shupe Graduate Program in Music Theory A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Abigail Shupe 2014 Abstract This dissertation studies the influence of Newtonianism as a cultural phenomenon on the theoretical writings of Jean-Philippe Rameau (1683-1764). Rameau’s Génération harmonique (1737) shows a change in his thinking from his earlier work that bears witness to the debates around Newtonian science in the scientific community. Scholars have discussed possible connections between Génération harmonique and Newton’s Opticks (1704) but none has studied this issue in detail. I argue that Rameau was influenced by Newtonianism rather than by Newton’s works, and that Rameau was not always aware of this influence. In order to situate Rameau’s work within the larger body of Newtonian works, I have compared it with Newton’s writings as well as other scientific texts of the early eighteenth century. First I provide a background on Newtonianism and its central figures, focusing especially on Voltaire’s Lettres philosophiques (1734) and the scandal surrounding its publication. I discuss Rameau’s use of experiments to demonstrate his concept of the corps sonore (the resonance of a vibrating body) and the connection between these experiments and other scientific works of the time. These experiments were based largely on the work of Dortous de Mairan (1668-1771) and can be understood as a part of Rameau’s attempt to gain status inside the Académie royale des sciences . Next I study Rameau’s use of certain terms that strongly resonated with Newtonian physics, especially as Voltaire had popularised it. Rameau’s use of these terms can be understood as his attempt to gain social status outside of the Académie by aligning his work with popular scientific works of the time. Finally, I consider the lack of Newtonian influence on Rameau’s works written after the 1730s. I interpret Rameau’s removal of Newtonian concepts and methods as a reflection of his larger goals to gain social status and to elevate music theory to the level of prestige accorded to the sciences. From his later works we can see that he used scientific methods and ideas ii opportunistically. Studying Rameau from this perspective situates his work within larger trends in Enlightenment science and demonstrates how music theory can be seen as a cultural product. Keywords Newtonianism, Rameau, Voltaire, Castel, Fundamental Bass, Corps Sonore , Experience, Enlightenment, Science, Music Theory iii Acknowledgments I wish to thank everyone who helped me complete this project. The faculty members and staff of the Don Wright Faculty of Music have been supportive of my work. In particular, I am grateful to have had Dr. Kevin Mooney as my primary advisor and mentor. Every student should be so lucky to have an advisor as patient and knowledgeable as he is. I am grateful that he never made anything easy. I also wish to thank my second reader, Dr. Richard Semmens, for reading the entire document and meticulously editing my translations. This project greatly benefitted from his careful reading. Other faculty members were especially supportive of my work at UWO, including Dr. Emily Ansari, Dr. John Cuciurean, Dr. Catherine Nolan, and Dr. Peter Franck. I am also grateful to administrative assistants Shelly Koster and Audrey Yardley-Jones for their help throughout my degree. In addition, I wish to thank Dr. Maryam Moshaver, whose feedback on my conference proposal greatly improved my dissertation. My colleagues at UWO were a constant source of encouragement. Matthew Toth, Ian Seiss, Emilie Marshall, Lauren Cooke, Kristen Wallentinsen, Peter Lea, Emily Adamowicz, and Katie Walshaw made my time at UWO enjoyable and provided much needed feedback throughout the completion of my dissertation. I would also like to thank my friends, Tim Best, Dr. Carla Aguilar, Dr. David Farrell, and Dr. Anna Gawboy for their guidance throughout my graduate studies. In particular, I am indebted to my friend Mark Chilla for reproducing Rameau’s table as a plate in this dissertation, and for his support and friendship from the beginning of our graduate studies. I wish to thank my family for their ongoing support. My parents, Janet and Andy Shupe, and my brother, Andrew, have always encouraged me and driven me to countless music lessons. Finally, I wish to thank my husband, John Pippen, who has always provided iv critical feedback on my work, reminded me to have a life outside of work, and always encouraged me to “write first.” v Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi List of Plates .................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview ............................................................................... 1 Overview of the Topic: Rameau and Newtonianism ..................................................... 2 Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 19 Rameau’s Treatises ............................................................................................... 19 Enlightenment Figures .......................................................................................... 22 Secondary Scholarship on Rameau’s Theories ..................................................... 26 Secondary Scholarship on the French Enlightenment and the History of Ideas ... 28 Secondary Scholarship Connecting Rameau with Enlightenment Thought ......... 33 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 38 Brief Chapter Summaries ............................................................................................. 41 Chapter 2: Rameau’s Contemporaries .............................................................................. 45 Voltaire’s Lettres philosophiques ................................................................................ 46 Maupertuis ................................................................................................................... 60 Castel ............................................................................................................................ 66 Fontenelle ..................................................................................................................... 68 “Soft” Newtonianism ................................................................................................... 73 L’Encyclopédie ............................................................................................................. 74 The Newton Wars? ....................................................................................................... 78 Chapter 3: Rameau, Newtonianism, and Experience ........................................................ 81 Mairan and Rameau ..................................................................................................... 84 Rameau’s Propositions and Experiments ..................................................................... 88 Génération harmonique and Other Newtonian Writings ............................................. 99 Reviews of and Reactions to Newtonianism in Génération harmonique .................. 113 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 121 Chapter 4: Rameau, Voltaire, and Castel ........................................................................ 124 Voltaire, Castel, and the Journal de Trévoux ............................................................. 127 Rameau and Voltaire .................................................................................................. 129 Rameau and Castel’s Polemic ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past

    Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past

    ROMANIA'S CULTURAL WARS : Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past Irina Livezeanu University of Pittsburgh The National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h 910 17`" Street, N.W . Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 2000 6 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Contractor : University of Pittsburgh Principal Investigator: Irina Livezeanu Council Contract Number : 816-08 Date : March 27, 2003 Copyright Informatio n Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funde d through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicat e and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract o r Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER's own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows : (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of th e United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale . * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by th e National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available b y the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Trainin g Act of 1983, as amended) .
  • Network Map of Knowledge And

    Network Map of Knowledge And

    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
  • From Lady Mary to Lady Bute: an Analysis of the Letters

    From Lady Mary to Lady Bute: an Analysis of the Letters

    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Plan B Papers Student Theses & Publications 1-1-1964 From Lady Mary to Lady Bute: An Analysis of the Letters Russell Atkins Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/plan_b Recommended Citation Atkins, Russell, "From Lady Mary to Lady Bute: An Analysis of the Letters" (1964). Plan B Papers. 363. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/plan_b/363 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Plan B Papers by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM LADY MARY TO LADY BUTE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LETTERS (TITLE) BY Russell Atkins PLAN B PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION AND PREPARED IN COURSE English 455 IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1964 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS PLAN B PAPER BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE DEGREE, M.S. IN ED. , /~.3 b_ 'P DATE\- ADVISER DEPARTMENT HEAD , c INT.RODUCTI ON In 1739 Lady Mary Wortley :M:ontagu departed England for Italy leaving behind her fifty years of aristocratic living. The reasons for Lady Mary's self-imposed exile have been a subject of speculation for scholars from that day to the present. Thanks to the research efforts of Robert Halsband it can now be stated that the principal reason was the love affair between Lady Mary and a twenty-five-year old Italian prince, Count Francesco Algarotti.
  • Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag

    Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag

    omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag.
  • Staying Optimistic: the Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism

    Staying Optimistic: the Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism

    Strickland, Lloyd 2019 Staying Optimistic: The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1(1): 3, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32881/jomp.3 RESEARCH Staying Optimistic: The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism Lloyd Strickland Manchester Metropolitan University, GB [email protected] The oft-told story of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world, or optimism, is that it enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the eighteenth century until the massive earthquake that struck Lisbon on 1 November 1755 destroyed its support. Despite its long history, this story is nothing more than a commentators’ fiction that has become accepted wisdom not through sheer weight of evidence but through sheer frequency of repetition. In this paper we shall examine the reception of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world in the eighteenth century in order to get a clearer understanding of what its fate really was. As we shall see, while Leibniz’s doctrine did win a good number of adherents in the 1720s and 1730s, especially in Germany, support for it had largely dried up by the mid-1740s; moreover, while opponents of Leibniz’s doctrine were few and far between in the 1710s and 1720s, they became increasing vocal in the 1730s and afterwards, between them producing an array of objections that served to make Leibnizian optimism both philosophically and theologically toxic years before the Lisbon earthquake struck. Keywords: Leibniz; Optimism; Best world; Lisbon earthquake; Evil; Wolff The oft-told story of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world, or optimism, is that it enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the eighteenth century until the massive earthquake that struck Lisbon on 1 November 1755 destroyed its support.
  • PDF Version (453

    PDF Version (453

    The Philhellenic Horizon: Homeric Prolegomena to the Greek War of Independence Constanze Güthenke Based on what Armstrong and Dué, in the invitation to this conference, have termed the Wolfian paradigm of Homeric research and its intersection with the preoccupations of the Romantic period (ballads; nature; language; nation; nostalgia; modernity), this paper examines the role of Homer within the horizon of European Philhellenism (in the sense of a partisan position favorable towards Modern Greece), as much as the impetus of this Philhellenism on approaches to Homer. I will first focus on the case of Wilhelm Müller, who achieved prominence in his own time mainly for his several volumes of Griechenlieder, written in support of the Greek War of Independence. In a second part, I want to speculate about the fate of Homeric knowledge and its use in post-independence Greece, whose writers were very highly aware of the Homeric features of the Western philhellenic endeavor. The overarching research framework behind this paper is the triangle between antiquity, the modern West and modern Greece, and its resulting tensions. The representation of modern Greece by way of a nature discourse is one example; the position of Greece vis-à-vis Europe, trying to reformulate conceptually the refractions and (mis-)representations arising from mutual perception, is another. This is also a question of comparativism, which is currently strongly exercising the Humanities again. Comparative literature is discussing again the notion of “world literature” and its imbalanced axes (see, e.g., Prendergast 2004), while history and the social sciences are continuously looking for new concepts of exchange and interplay as a heuristic method.
  • Newton's Mathematical Physics

    Newton's Mathematical Physics

    Isaac Newton A new era in science Waseda University, SILS, Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . Newton’s Legacy Newton brought to a close the astronomical revolution begun by Copernicus. He combined the dynamic research of Galileo with the astronomical work of Kepler. He produced an entirely new cosmology and a new way of thinking about the world, based on the interaction between matter and mathematically determinate forces. He joined the mathematical and experimental methods: the hypothetico-deductive method. His work became the model for rational mechanics as it was later practiced by mathematicians, particularly during the Enlightenment. LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . William Blake’s Newton (1795) LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . Newton’s De Motu coporum in gyrum Edmond Halley (of the comet) visited Cambridge in 1684 and 1 talked with Newton about inverse-square forces (F 9 d2 ). Newton stated that he has already shown that inverse-square force implied an ellipse, but could not find the documents. Later he rewrote this into a short document called De Motu coporum in gyrum, and sent it to Halley. Halley was excited and asked for a full treatment of the subject. Two years later Newton sent Book I of The Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy (Principia). Key Point The goal of this project was to derive the orbits of bodies from a simpler set of assumptions about motion. That is, it sought to explain Kepler’s Laws with a simpler set of laws.
  • Frederick the Great's Sexuality – New Avenues of Approach

    Frederick the Great's Sexuality – New Avenues of Approach

    History in the Making, volume 8, 2021 Frederick the Great’s Sexuality – New Avenues of Approach JACKSON SHOOBERT Frederick the Great’s sexual orientation provides an interesting case study; one that dissects the nature of power, temporality, and sexuality within the confines of elite Prussian eighteenth- century society. Analysis of this subject is significantly complicated by a deep web of adolescent repression which culminated in a level of prudence that still leaves modern scholars without a conclusive definition of Frederick’s sexuality.1 The sexuality of any human forms an important portion of their personality. Ignoring this facet for the sake of a convenient narrative is detrimental to understanding historical characters and the decisions they make.2 Examining how Frederick expressed his sexuality and the inferences this renders about his character will generate a more nuanced understanding without being confined in a broad categorisation as a homosexual. For Frederick, this aspect has been neglected in no small part due to methods he undertook to hide portions of his nature from contemporaries and his legacy. A thorough investigation of the sexuality of Frederick the Great and its interrelations with his personality is therefore long overdue. Frederick the Great, one of the most eminent men of his time, was not an obviously heterosexual man. His sexuality, which has only truly become a legitimate subject for inquiry within the last 60 years, has always been an integral component of his character, permeating from his adolescence unto his death. Despite ground-breaking works by German and Anglo authors in the last decade, the research has barely scraped the surface of what can be learned from Frederick and his sexuality.
  • Iphigénie En Tauride

    Iphigénie En Tauride

    Christoph Willibald Gluck Iphigénie en Tauride CONDUCTOR Tragedy in four acts Patrick Summers Libretto by Nicolas-François Guillard, after a work by Guymond de la Touche, itself based PRODUCTION Stephen Wadsworth on Euripides SET DESIGNER Saturday, February 26, 2011, 1:00–3:25 pm Thomas Lynch COSTUME DESIGNER Martin Pakledinaz LIGHTING DESIGNER Neil Peter Jampolis CHOREOGRAPHER The production of Iphigénie en Tauride was Daniel Pelzig made possible by a generous gift from Mr. and Mrs. Howard Solomon. Additional funding for this production was provided by Bertita and Guillermo L. Martinez and Barbara Augusta Teichert. The revival of this production was made possible by a GENERAL MANAGER gift from Barbara Augusta Teichert. Peter Gelb MUSIC DIRECTOR James Levine Iphigénie en Tauride is a co-production with Seattle Opera. 2010–11 Season The 17th Metropolitan Opera performance of Christoph Willibald Gluck’s Iphigénie en This performance is being broadcast Tauride live over The Toll Brothers– Metropolitan Conductor Opera Patrick Summers International Radio Network, in order of vocal appearance sponsored by Toll Brothers, Iphigénie America’s luxury Susan Graham homebuilder®, with generous First Priestess long-term Lei Xu* support from Second Priestess The Annenberg Cecelia Hall Foundation, the Vincent A. Stabile Thoas Endowment for Gordon Hawkins Broadcast Media, A Scythian Minister and contributions David Won** from listeners worldwide. Oreste Plácido Domingo This performance is Pylade also being broadcast Clytemnestre Paul Groves** Jacqueline Antaramian live on Metropolitan Opera Radio on Diane Agamemnon SIRIUS channel 78 Julie Boulianne Rob Besserer and XM channel 79. Saturday, February 26, 2011, 1:00–3:25 pm This afternoon’s performance is being transmitted live in high definition to movie theaters worldwide.
  • Pope Benedict XVI on Faith and Reason

    Pope Benedict XVI on Faith and Reason

    Digital Commons @ Assumption University Philosophy Department Faculty Works Philosophy Department 2009 Pope Benedict XVI on Faith and Reason Daniel P. Maher Assumption College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.assumption.edu/philosophy-faculty Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Maher, Daniel P. "Pope Benedict XVI on Faith and Reason." Nova et Vetera vol. 7 no. 3 (Summer 2009): 625-652. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy Department at Digital Commons @ Assumption University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Department Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Assumption University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. t\'oi-<1 et Vt>tera, English Edition, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2009): 625-52 625 Pope Benedict XVI on Faith and R eason DANIEL P. MAHER Assu111p1io11 Colle)!e Wi>rcesrer, Massacltuselts T HE MOST widely noted aspect of Pope Benedict's speech at the University of Regensburg in September of 2006 has been his quotation of a brief passage from an otherwise obscure text chat, with "startling brusqueness," speaks ill of Islam. I The Holy Father stated that he found chis brusqueness "unacceptable," but, evidently, not so unacceptable as to preclude his quoting it. H is willingness to use the text has been judged still more unacceptable by large numbers of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. And this reaction in its various forms has diverted attention from and nearly ovenvhelmed the central message of the speech. That message focuses on the adequacy of human reason for coming co know God.
  • Pre-Darwinian Thinking, the Voyage of the Beagle, and the Origin of Species

    Pre-Darwinian Thinking, the Voyage of the Beagle, and the Origin of Species

    Pre-Darwinian thinking, the voyage of the Beagle, and the Origin of Species How did life originate? What is responsible for the spectacular diversity that we see now? These are questions that have occupied numerous people for all of recorded history. Indeed, many independent mythological traditions have stories that discuss origins, and some of those are rather creative. For example, in Norse mythology the world was created out of the body of a frost giant! Some early attempts at scientific or philosophical discussion of life were apparent in Greece. For example, Thales (the earliest of the identified Greek philosophers) argued that everything stemmed ultimately from water. He therefore had a somewhat vague idea that descent with modification was possible, since things had to diversify from a common origin. Aristotle suggested that in every thing is a desire to move from lower to higher forms, and ultimately to the divine. Anaximander might have come closest to our modern conception: he proposed that humans originated from other animals, based on the observation that babies need care for such a long time that if the first humans had started like that, they would not have survived. Against this, however, is the observation that in nature, over human-scale observation times, very little seems to change about life as we can see it with our unaided eyes. Sure, the offspring of an individual animal aren’t identical to it, but puppies grow up to be dogs, not cats. Even animals that have very short generational times appear not to change sub- stantially: one fruit fly is as good as another.
  • Reposs #19: Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790

    Reposs #19: Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790

    RePoSS: Research Publications on Science Studies RePoSS #19: Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790 Helge Kragh August 2012 Centre for Science Studies, University of Aarhus, Denmark Research group: History and philosophy of science Please cite this work as: Helge Kragh (Aug. 2012). Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790. RePoSS: Research Publications on Sci- ence Studies 19. Aarhus: Centre for Science Studies, University of Aarhus. url: http://www.css.au.dk/reposs. Copyright c Helge Kragh, 2012 1 Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690-1790 HELGE KRAGH 1 Introduction In the present context, the Scandinavian countries refer to two national or administrative units, the one being Denmark and the other Sweden. In the period here considered, largely the century from 1690 to 1790, ‘Denmark’ means really Denmark-Norway, for until 1814 Norway was part of the double monarchy ruled by the king and his government in Copenhagen. It should also be kept in mind that parts of what is today Germany, namely Schleswig-Holstein, belonged to the kingdom. However, as far as language and culture were concerned, these parts of southern Denmark were more German than Danish, and they played no important role in the scientific life of the kingdom. Sweden covered a much larger geographical area than it does today. The country had expanded greatly during the seventeenth century, when not only Finland but also parts of the Baltic area and northern Germany came under Swedish rule. About 1720, after the Great Northern War, Sweden lost most of its possessions, but the major part of Finland remained as part of the country until Centre for Science Studies, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark.