‘Divine Corinna’: Pre-Twentieth Century Receptions of an Artistic Authority1 THEA S. THORSEN The Norwegian University of Science and Technology
[email protected] Introduction At the heart of the reception history of Corinna of Tanagra lies an asto- nishing idea. This is the idea that she was not only a poet, but also honou- red as an authority in the artistic and intellectual domain of literature and a champion in poetic contest against Pindar2, her alleged Boeotian compatriot, poet-colleague and fellow student3. Indeed, as such, the idea 1 — I wish to thank the editors Jacqueline Fabre-Serris and Judith Hallett for kindly welco- ming this article and helping me improve my argument. Thanks are also due to the anonymous referees, whose efforts to aid me in improving this article have been beyond what could reasonably be expected; for generous help of various other kinds I am grateful to (in alphabetical order) Benedetto Benedetti, Robert Emil Berge, Stephen Harrison, Daria Lanzuolo, Maria Emelia Masci and last, but not least, Marina Prusac-Lindhagen. 2 — The coinage ‘artistic authority’ is meant to evoke all these aspects; Corinna’s occupation as poet, her standing as honoured and her alleged superiority over Pindar. 3 — Pindar’s name occurs twice in Corinna’s extant fragments. One instance is preserved in the grammarian Apollonius Dyscolus: Βοιωτοὶ <ἱών>, ὡς μὲν Τρύφων... ὡς δὲ ἔνιοι, ὧν ἐστιν ὁ Ἅβρων, θέμα ἐστίν, ὃ συζύγως οἱ αὐτοί φασι, τῇ μὲν ἐγών τὴν ἱών, <τῇ δὲ ἐγώνη τὴν ἱώνει>, εἴγε τὸ παρὰ Δωριεῦσιν η εἰς ει μεταβάλλεται, τῇ δ’ ἐγώνγα τὴν ἱώνγα.