No. 19: Future Scenarios for the South Caucasus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No. 19: Future Scenarios for the South Caucasus caucasus analytical caucasus analytical digest 19/10 digest There is an increasing awareness of the artificial based on opportunistic alliance building. Relation- nature of the concept of the South Caucasus, group- ships between governments, outside forces, and domes- ing together three countries, which are indeed not to tic actors cease as quickly as they develop. Though giv- be treated as one entity. Especially the countries of the ing an impression of political progress, the region as a South Caucasus regard this concept with hesitation as whole stagnates socially and economically and leaves they see the danger that it neglects, at least conceptu- itself exposed to outside intervention. Peaceful coexis- ally, the individual development paths and character- tence and local escalation of conflict come and go. istics of each country. Countries of the South Cauca- While mild forms of authoritarianism assert them- sus will not fulfill the external expectations of regional selves in the countries of the South Caucasus, the integration, but fragment. Over time, individual coun- region remains a contested space. As Europe becomes tries might integrate with outside neighbours. It may less engaged, due to lack of progress and the political well be possible that in 2025 Armenia will have under- developments on the ground, Russia and Turkey real- gone advanced integrated with Turkey, Azerbaijan will ize mutual benefits from cooperating economically and have become part of the Caspian region and Georgia politically in the region. Meanwhile, Russia is able to will have oriented West and become an integral part of create a space of “sovereign democracies” including Mol- the Black Sea region. dova, Belarus and Ukraine. If this development coin- cides with the EU maintaining a closed door policy Scenario 4: Muddling Through toward Turkey, a new East–West divide will be consol- The region continues to be based on balance of power idated and the countries of the South Caucasus will face concepts. The survival strategies of regional players are further isolation westward. About the Authors Sven Behrendt is a Visiting Scholar at the Carnegie Middle East Center. Iris Kempe is the Director of the Heinrich Boell Foundation South Caucasus. The 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Sochi: Implications for the Caucasus By Stanislav Secrieru, Bucharest Abstract Predicting what will happen next in international politics is never an easy task. When it comes to the Cau- casus, anticipating the region’s alternative futures is even more complicated. However, a high degree of vola- tility makes such an effort worthwhile. The Sochi Olympics is among the factors which should not be under- estimated in scenario building for the Caucasus. Intensive preparations for 2014 already serve as a catalyst for economic development as well as a cause for environmental concerns. Looking beyond the immediate effects, the Sochi factor is also likely to affect politics and security in the entire Caucasus. Future Scenarios and the Sochi Factor are a case in point. The Russian Black Sea resort city of Regional scenario building traditionally revolves around Sochi is located in the immediate vicinity of Georgia’s optimistic, hybrid (combining a mix of positive and neg- breakaway region of Abkhazia (113 km separate Sochi ative trends) and skeptical projections. However, this from Sukhumi) and the politically fragile republic of classic approach is far from perfect. To reduce uncer- Karachaevo-Cherkessia (part of Russia’s North Cau- tainty about the region’s possible futures as much as pos- casus Federal District). The geographical location of sible, the foresight exercise needs to address the impact the 2014 Olympic Games venue, coupled with the eco- of local mega-events on regional developments too. As nomic opportunities it offers (the event’s budget is esti- far future scenarios for the Caucasus are concerned, the mated at $30 billion) and a variety of ongoing political Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, scheduled for 2014, and security challenges transforms Sochi, for the next 4 caucasus analytical caucasus analytical digest 19/10 digest four years, into one of the region’s focal points. Thus and the importance it attaches to the Olympic Games in any realistic scenario planning for the Caucasus should Sochi. In Russia, international sports victories are associ- consider the immediate and potential far-reaching con- ated with the performance of the political regime. Thus, sequences of this sporting event. Moscow will work hard to prove in 2014 that Russia Intensive preparations for 2014 already serve as a is still an elite sports nation. Domestically, a successful catalyst for positive as well as negative developments. performance at the Olympic Games should uphold the Sochi is a huge construction site which attracts work- Kremlin’s slogan, promoted over the last decade, that ers from the economically depressed Northern Cauca- the country is “rising from its knees.” In terms of for- sus (in particular North Ossetia which is home to refu- eign policy, the extensive media exposure surrounding gees from South Ossetia) and South Caucasus republics the games (an estimated 4.7 billion viewers followed badly battered by the global financial crisis. An influx the Beijing Games in 2008) provide Russia with a great of Armenian workers into Sochi is already underway, a opportunity to boost its “soft power” potential by over- process facilitated by the compact Armenian minority hauling its image and portraying itself as a “civilized which resides in the city. In this way, the Sochi Olym- great power”. The construction of Olympic venues from pics provide job opportunities, alleviating to some extent scratch may help demonstrate that Russia has not lost the social pressure across a region known for high unem- the ability to implement highly complex projects. As ployment rates. On the negative side, the massive con- President Medvedev put it “this is our chance to show struction campaign inflicts irreparable damage on local the world that we are a capable, hospitable and techno- ecosystems. Russian NGOs have identified grave irreg- logically-advanced country.” ularities during the construction projects, imperiling the Sochi National Park and Caucasus State Nature Russian-Made Stability Biosphere Reserve, the latter of which is included on In light of the Chinese experience in dealing with the the UNESCO World Heritage site list. Civil society in protests supporting Tibet along the Olympic flame route, tourist-dependent Abkhazia has quietly raised concerns it is reasonable to assume that Russia will strive for sta- about the massive extraction of local sand and stone for bility (as this term is understood in Moscow) in the Sochi construction sites, worrying that this effort will South and North Caucasus. Moscow would not like harm coastal river deltas and Black Sea beaches. Thus, to see public opinion distracted by security and politi- instead of improving living conditions, the “Sochi affair” cal problems in the North Caucasus, its illegal military could significantly deteriorate the environment of the presence in Georgia, or the potential renewal of hostili- local communities and damage the tourist industry. ties between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In the worst case Looking beyond the socio-economic and environ- scenario, such developments could deliver a heavy blow mental impact, it is plausible to assume that the Sochi to the Sochi Olympics PR campaign, provoke a boycott factor will affect politics and security in the Caucasus. by an influential part of the international community, As the Olympic Games approach, state, non-state and or result in the non-participation of the belligerent sides. anti-state regional actors are likely to either restrain their There are early signs that point to Russia’s intentions behavior or engage in spoiler tactics. As the host of the to assure stability in a highly volatile region. The cre- games, Russia will actively pursue its objectives in the ation of the North Caucasus Federal District in Janu- region. However, other regional players also see in the ary 2010 and the appointment of the former business- Olympics a window of opportunity, and are determined man Alexander Khloponin to lead it indicate that the to push vigorously for agendas often running counter Kremlin is looking for a more balanced mix between to those professed by the Kremlin. blunt power projection and a transformative approach in the North Caucasus to address the structural problems Sports and Politics Nexus which breed violence and unrest. Khloponin’s demand Russia traditionally has been strong in winter sports, to appoint an ethnic Cherkess as a prime-minister of winning more medals than the average country. How- Karachaevo-Cherkessia in accordance with the infor- ever, the national team’s poor performance at the 2010 mal power distribution algorithm (the president of the Games in Vancouver proved to be a major disappoint- republic is an ethnic Karachai, the vice-president and ment. President Medvedev’s last minute decision to can- speaker of the republican legislative is an ethnic Rus- cel his trip to Vancouver and the subsequent “purge” of sian) shows that Moscow keeps an eye on the poten- the country’s sports federations provide a good sense of tial flashpoints close to Sochi and is willing to contain how Russia perceives its failures in international arenas any manifestation of ethnic discord. In the South Cau- 5 caucasus analytical caucasus analytical digest 19/10 digest casus, Russian diplomacy played a positive role favor- ers harbor no illusion about the chances of a pro-Rus- ing, even if half-heartedly, the Turkish-Armenian rap- sian candidate. The best case scenario for Russia would prochement. Far from being decisive, the Sochi factor be a succession to power in Georgia of a Timoshenko- is likely to influence Russian policy seeking to maintain type politician—one who is more sensitive to Kremlin the power equilibrium between Armenia and Azerbai- interests and who would engage Russia in a pragmatic jan to minimize the chances of conflict unfreezing in co-existence in the South Caucasus, pursuing a multi- Nagorno-Karabakh ahead of the 2014 Games.
Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX 6. a List of Natural Areas in Preferential Protection (NAPP) Accessible for Federal Grid Company for the Purposes of Operation
    APPENDICES APPENDIX 6. A List of Natural Areas in Preferential Protection (NAPP) Accessible for Federal Grid Company for the Purposes of Operation A type of title Location (RF region, № Federal Grid Company Facility Land area, hectares to the land city, etc.) Name of NAPP MES of Center Upper Don PMES 1 220kV HVL Voronezhskaya 1.2 (11.944km) 35.8 Leased Russia, Voronezh The Voronezh State Natural Region, Verkhnehavsky Biospheric Reserve District Volga-Don PMES 2 500 kV HVL Balashovskaya-Lipetskaya (8.468km, supports 0.3157 Leased NN 894-9150) Novokhopersk District, The Khoper State Natural Voronezh Region Reserve 3 500 kV HVL Balashovskaya – Lipetskaya 2 (with a branch to Novovoronezhskaya NPP), 8.777 km, supports NN 894-916. 0.8406 Moscow PMES Moscow Region, 4 220 kV Kashira-Oka 1,2 11.97 In actual use The Prioksky Terrace State Serpukhov District Biospheric Reserve Priokskoye PMES Kaluga Region, 5 500 kV HVL Smolenskaya NPP – Kaluzhskaya 0.984 In open-ended Ugra National Park permanent use Ukhnovsky District 0.135 Leased Kaluga Region, 6 220 kV HVL Cherepet – Liteinaya Kaluga Blaze Reserve Kozelsky District 7 220 kV HVL Cherepet – Tsementnaya 0.051 500 kV HVL Smolenskaya NPP - Mikhailovskaya Kaluga Region, 8 2.912 Leased Uljanovsky District Chernozemnoye PMES 9 500 kV HVL Novobryanskaya – Yelets (commissioned in 185.5 Leased Orel Region, Orel Forest National Park 1997, supports NN 212-308, 26.5km long) Khotynetsky District MES Siberia Khakasskoye PMES 10 500 kV HVL Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP – Leased Republic of Khakassia Shoria National
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Species of Shield-Head Vipers in the Caucasus
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2016. 1 (3): 11–25 RARE SPECIES OF SHIELD-HEAD VIPERS IN THE CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 03.10.2016 An overview is presented on shield-head vipers of the genus Pelias distributed in the post-Soviet countries of the Caucasian Ecoregion. The assessment presents the current conservation status and recommendations to vipers’ ter- ritorial protection. Key words: Caucasian Ecoregion, shield-head vipers, current status, protection. Introduction The Caucasian Ecoregion (the territory south- to-landscape descriptions (Tunieyv B.S. et al., 2009; ward from the Kuma-Manych depression to north- Tuniyev S.B. et al., 2012, 2014). The stationary works eastern Turkey and northwestern Iran) is the centre (mostly on the territory of the Caucasian State Nature of taxonomic diversity of shield-head vipers within Biosphere reserve and Sochi National Park) conducted the genus Pelias Merrem, 1820, of which 13–18 a study of the microclimatic features of vipers’ habitats species are found here. Without exception, all spe- including temperature and humidity modes of air and cies have a status of the different categories of rare- the upper soil horizon. The results were compared with ness, they are included on the IUCN Red list, or in thermobiological characteristics of the animals (Tuni- the current and upcoming publication of National yev B.S. & Unanian, 1986; Tuniyev B.S. & Volčik, and Regional Red Data Books. Besides the shield- 1995). In a number of cases difficult to determine the head vipers the Caucasian Ecoregion inhabit three taxonomic affiliation, in addition to the classical meth- representatives of mountain vipers of the genus ods of animal morphology and statistics, biochemistry Montivipera Nilson, Tuniyev, Andren, Orlov, Joger and molecular-genetic analysis methods have been ap- & Herrman, 1999 (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Report English Pdf 92.58 KB
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT I. BASIC DATA Organization Legal Name: Environmental Watch on the North West Caucasus Project Title (as stated in the grant agreement): Public Campaign for Western Greater Caucasus Biodiversity Protection from Planning of Olympic Games in Sochi Region / Russia Implementation Partners for This Project: International Socio-Ecological Union, Greenpeace Russia, NABU, Druzhinas for Nature Preservation Movement, WWF Russia, Center of Environmental Policy of Russia, Sochi Branch of Russian Geographical Society, NGO "Our Sochi", Krasnodar Regional Branch of All-Russia Public Association "United Civil Green Alternative" (GROZA) (NGO "ETnIСA"), Maikop City Organization of VOOP, Environmental group "For Life!", Center for the protection of constitutional rights and liberties of people, Public Environmental Council of Sochi, Public Council of Sochi, Public Chamber of Sochi, Committee of Sochi's Rescue, Design Laboratory "Ar-Ko", "Eco-Expert" Ltd, etc. Project Dates (as stated in the grant agreement): May 1, 2006 - October 31, 2006 Project Dates (really): Juny 15, 2006 – July 10, 2007 Date of Report (month/year): 12/2007 II. OPENING REMARKS Provide any opening remarks that may assist in the review of this report. In connection with the fact that it was extremely important to support the active public participation in the process of decision making relative to the Olympic Games 2014 location, and since the Environmental Watch on North Caucasus did not possess any other means for realization of these activities, the accomplishment of the project lasted longer than it was expected – more than one year. III. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS 1. What was the initial objective of this project? The initial objective of this project was the prevention of Olympic Games 2014 realization on the especially protected areas of Western Caucasus and within boundaries of World Heritage Site and also averting of negative and irreplaceable effect to its biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN FEDERATION This Large Site on the Western End of the Greater Caucasus Mountains Is in One of the Few Great Mountain Ranges of Europe Almost Undisturbed by Man
    WESTERN CAUCASUS RUSSIAN FEDERATION This large site on the western end of the Greater Caucasus Mountains is in one of the few great mountain ranges of Europe almost undisturbed by man. Its extensive mountain forests, from subtropical to alpine, are unique in Europe and its high pastures have been grazed only by wild animals. The site is on the edge of the Colchian centre of plant diversity barely 30 kilometres from the Black Sea. Stretching between lowlands and alpine mountains, it includes four-fifths of the ecosystems of the Caucasus and includes many endemic and relict species such as the reintroduced European bison. Threats to the site: Construction of more than 250 facilities for the 2014 Winter Olympics is heavily impinging on the site and region. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Western Caucasus NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1999: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE [pending] The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription: Justification for Inscription The Western Caucasus has a remarkable diversity of geology, ecosystems and species. It is of global significance as a centre of plant diversity. Along with the Virgin Komi World Heritage site, it is the only large mountain area in Europe that has not experienced significant human impact, containing extensive tracts of undisturbed mountain forests unique on the European scale. INTERNATIONAL DESIGNATION 1978: Kavkazskiy designated a Biosphere Reserve under the
    [Show full text]
  • From Sacred Cow to Cash Cow Muller, Martin
    From sacred cow to cash cow Muller, Martin License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NoDerivs (CC BY-ND) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Müller, M 2014, 'From sacred cow to cash cow: the shifting political ecologies of protected areas in Russia', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 127-143. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2011/2012 02
    activity 2011/2012report 01 Activity Report 2011/2012 02 The IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group The Cat Specialist Group is responsible for the global assessment of the conservation status of all 37 wild living cat species. We coordinate and support the activities of currently 203 leading scientists, nature conservation officers and wild lifemanagers in currently 57 countries. The main tasks include: - to maintain the network of cat experts and partners; - to continuously assess the status and conservation needs of the 37 cat species; - to support governments with strategic conservation planning; - to develop capacity in felid conservation; - to provide services to members and partners; - to assure the financial resources for the Cat Specialist Group. For the activity reports we present some of our achievements against these six main tasks. Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Urs Breitenmoser Co-chairs IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group Cover photo: Sand cat in Iran (Photo Naein/DoE) IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group Activity Report 2011/12: Contents The Network Amazing Species ...................................................................................................................................4 Rabinowitz-Kaplan Prize for Excellence in Cat Conservation ...............................................................4 SSC Chairs Meeting in Abu Dhabi ........................................................................................................5 Species Assessment and Conservation Activities Cats in Iran: status assessment ............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin
    The Bulletin A Quarterly Devoted to Man's Oldest Garden Ornamental Boxwood hunters in Russia. Dr. Alexey Romashin, Charles Fooks, Dr. TomaszAnisko, Rima Pridnya, and Dr. Mikhail Pridnya pose below a statue of Prometheus, a Titan who stole fire from Olympus and delivered it to man. See article, page 27. (Photo: Dr. Henry Frierson) IN THIS ISSUE Return to the Greater Caucasus, 2004, Henry F. Frierson, Jr., MD ..... ......... 27 Correspondence and Notice .. ......... ................... ................. ................. ........ .... 36 Walking with Phoebe, Sigrid G. Harriman ........................... .......... ....... ....... 37 News of the Society .. ......... ............. .. ... .. .................................. ....... ... ... ........... 41 October 2004 Volume 44, Number 2 The American Boxwood Society The American Boxwood Society is a not-for-profit organiza­ A vailable Publications: ti on founded in 1961 and devoted to the appreciation, scien­ ti fi c understanding and propagation of the genus Buxus L. Boxwood: An Illustrated Encyclopedia* $110 Back issues of The Bulletin (through Vol. 42) (each) $ 4 For information about boxwood and the Society, refer to Boxwood Handbook: A Practical Guide (Revised) $ 18 www.boxwoodsociety.org. Boxwood Buyer 's Guide (5 th Edition) $ 8 Officers: International Registration List of Cultivated Buxus L. $ 3 Index to The Boxwood Bulletin 1961-1986 $ 10 PRESIDENT: Index to The Boxwood Bulletin 1986- 1991 $ 4 Mr. Charles T. Fooks Salisbury, MD Index to The Boxwood Bulletin 1991-1996 $ 3 FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT: To order, see page 36. Mr. Clyde Weber Bentleyville, PA * Other prices includes tax, postage and handling. SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Publications may be ordered from ABS Treasurer, Box 85 , Dr. Henry F. Frierson, Jr. Charlottesville. V A Boyce, VA 22620-0085. SECRETARY: Mrs. Laurie Jamerson Madison Heights, V A Contributions: EXECUTIVE TREASURER: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Биота И Среда Заповедных Территорий Issn 2618-6764 Научный Рецензируемый Журнал 2019, № 2 Журнал Основан В 2013 Году, Издаётся С 2014 Года
    БИОТА И СРЕДА ЗАПОВЕДНЫХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ISSN 2618-6764 НАУЧНЫЙ РЕЦЕНЗИРУЕМЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ 2019, № 2 Журнал основан в 2013 году, издаётся с 2014 года. В 2014–2017 годах именовался «Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока» (Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves), ISSN 2227-149X. Учредители: Дальневосточное отделение Российской академии наук и Дальневосточный морской заповедник — филиал Национального научного центра морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук. Редколлегия: главный редактор — Богатов Виктор Всеволодович, член-корр. РАН, д-р биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточное отделение РАН (ДВО РАН), Владивосток; зам. главного редактора — Дроздов Анатолий Леонидович, д-р биол. наук, проф., Национальный научный центр морской биологии им. А. В. Жирмунского ДВО РАН (ННЦМБ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; отв. секретарь редколлегии, и. о. зав редакцией — Тюрин Алексей Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, Дальне- восточный морской заповедник — филиал ННЦМБ ДВО РАН; Богачева Анна Вениаминовна, д-р биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Боркин Лев Яковлевич, канд. биол. наук, Зоологический институт РАН (ЗИН РАН), Санкт-Петербург; Глущенко Юрий Николаевич, канд. биол. наук, проф., Дальневосточный федеральный университет (ДВФУ), филиал, Уссурийск; Дьякова Ольга Васильевна, д-р ист. наук, проф., Институт истории, археологии и этнографии народов Дальнего Востока ДВО РАН (ИИАЭ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Ильин Игорь Николаевич, д-р биол. наук, Институт проблем экологии и эволюции им. А. Н. Северцова РАН, Москва; Прозорова Лариса Аркадьевна, канд. биол. наук, Федеральный научный центр биоразнообразия наземной биоты Восточной Азии ДВО РАН (ФНЦ Биоразнообразия ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пушкарь Владимир Степанович, д-р геогр. наук, проф., Дальневосточный геологический институт ДВО РАН (ДВГИ ДВО РАН), Владивосток; Пшеничников Борис Фёдорович, д-р биол.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUCASUS ECOREGION NEWSLETTER News from the Caucasus
    NEWSLETTER 2014 Talish mountains © WWF-Caucasus CAUCASUS ECOREGION NEWSLETTER News from the Caucasus Special Issue One male and two females of Caucasian leopard live in Southern Armenia Since September 2013 to April 2014 WWF experts got camera trapped photos of different leopards. The analyses of the photos show that at least one male and two females live in the area for over a year. It gives hope that in 2014 the females will be able to deliver cubs and WWF will try to get their photos too. Of course, it will require more attention and harder work to enforce the protection of these animals in the area. According to the camera trapped photos and field monitoring data the number of prey species (bezoar goat, mouflon) for the leopard has been increased. These achievements are the result of a long-term work carried out by WWF since 2002, including enforcement of existing Protected Areas (Khosrov and Shikahogh Reserves), establishment of new Protected Areas (Arevik National Park, Zangezur and Khustup Sanctuaries) in the area of the main habitats of leopard through partnership with the Ministry of Nature Protection, the State Environmental Inspectorate, Protected Areas, donors, communities and partner NGOs. In 2014 WWF will conduct regional and national workshops on the development of the Regional Conservation Strategy for leopard and the National Action Plans. Meantime, WWF will continue its cooperation with the partners on enforcement of Protected Areas system in Armenia as well as will work on consolidation of the Protected Areas ecological network in the south of the country through establishment of ecological corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—
    insects Article History of the Biodiversity of Ladybirds (Coccinellidae) at the Black Sea Coast of the Russian Caucasus in the Last 120 Years—Does the Landscape Transformation and Establishment of Harmonia axyridis Have an Impact? Andrzej O. Bie ´nkowskiand Marina J. Orlova-Bienkowskaja * A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 21 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Simple Summary: Studies of the history of regional insect fauna are important for understanding the changes in ecosystems and are therefore crucial for conservation decisions. The harlequin ladybird is a global invader that causes the decline of native ladybirds in some countries. Therefore, it is advisable to monitor the ladybird fauna in regions recently occupied by this species. We analyzed the dynamics of the fauna at the main sea resort of Russia over a period of 120 years to determine the following: (1) how the ladybird biodiversity changed during the intensive landscape transformation; (2) what alien species introduced for pest control have occurred to date; and (3) what the impact is of the harlequin ladybird on the ladybird fauna. We examined specimens collected by us and 54 other collectors including specimens from old museum collections and reconstructed the history of the biodiversity like a picture from puzzle pieces. Surprisingly, landscape transformation did not cause a decrease but rather an increase in ladybird biodiversity; most of the species recorded before 1930 have occurred to date, and 23 other species have spread to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caucasus
    Cooperation in the European Mountains 2: The Caucasus European Programme Established in 1987, the European Programme seeks to identify and analyse the economic and social forces impacting on biodiversity conservation, and apply the power of the constituency to address them. The Programme is active in species and ecosystem-based conservation within the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries sectors and supports regional and global policy analysis and recommendations. IUCN is present in 47 of the 55 countries of the Pan-European region. IUCN's European constituency, 325 governmental and non-governmental members, six expert Commissions, and the Secretariat, provides a broad-based democratic forum for exchanging views, and taking joint action. Over 3,000 experts, organised into six networks (on ecosystem management; education and com- munication; environmental law; environment, economy and society; species survival; and protected areas/Parks for Life), provide scientific weight to the policy formulated and disseminated by the European Programme in seeking to influence societies. Since 1997, the European Programme has been co-ordinated from the IUCN European Regional Office-ERO, (based in Tilburg, The Netherlands). There is also a Central European Office (in Warsaw, Poland), a Russian Federation and CIS Office (in Moscow, Russian Federation), and a joint IUCN-REC unit (in Szentendre, Hungary). European Regional Office Cooperation in the European Mountains 2: The Caucasus Edited by Martin F. Price Environmental Research Series 13 IUCN – The World Conservation Union 2000 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or the Government of the Netherlands concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]