DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Genomics of Closely Related Thermococcus Isolates, a Genus of Hyperthermophilic Archaea Damien Courtine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Comparative genomics of closely related Thermococcus isolates, a genus of hyperthermophilic Archaea Damien Courtine To cite this version: Damien Courtine. Comparative genomics of closely related Thermococcus isolates, a genus of hy- perthermophilic Archaea. Genomics [q-bio.GN]. Université de Bretagne occidentale - Brest, 2017. English. NNT : 2017BRES0149. tel-01900466v1 HAL Id: tel-01900466 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01900466v1 Submitted on 22 Oct 2018 (v1), last revised 22 Oct 2018 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse&préparée&à&l'Université&de&Bretagne&Occidentale& pour obtenir le diplôme de DOCTEUR&délivré&de&façon&partagée&par& présentée par L'Université&de&Bretagne&Occidentale&et&l'Université&de&Bretagne&Loire& ! Damien Courtine Spécialité):)Microbiologie) ) Préparée au Laboratoire de Microbiologie des École!Doctorale!Sciences!de!la!Mer!et!du!Littoral! Environnements Extrêmes (LM2E) UMR6197, UBO – Ifremer – CNRS – Génomique comparative Thèse!soutenue!le!19!Décembre!2017! devant le jury composé de : d'isolats Anna?Louise!REYSENBACH!! Professeur, Université de Portland (USA) / Rapporteur) phylogénétiquement Simonetta!GRIBALDO! proches appartenant au Directrice de Recherche, Institut Pasteur / Rapporteur) genre Thermococcus, une Dominique!LAVENIER!! Directeur de Recherche, CNRS Rennes / Examinateur) archée hyperthermophile Karine!ALAIN!! Chargée de recherche, CNRS Brest / Directrice)de)thèse) Loïs!MAIGNIEN! Maître de Conférence, Université de Bretagne Occidentale / Co9 encadrant) A.!Murat!EREN! Maître de conférence, Université de Chicago (USA) / Co9encadrant) Yann!MOALIC! Enseignant Chercheur, Université de Bretagne Occidentale / Invité Acknowledgements This thesis work was carried out at the Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes (LM2E) at the Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (IUEM). It was financed by the Région Bretagne (Brittany Region) and Labex MER. I thank Mohamed Jebbar, Anne Godfroy and Didier Flament for welcoming me in this laboratory. First of all, I would like to sincerely thank the members of the jury who agreed to evaluate this work. I would like to thank Anna-Louise Reysenbach, Professor at the Portland University, and Simoneta Gribaldo, Research director at the Institut Pasteur, for agreeing to review this thesis. I would also like to thank DominiQue Lavenier, Research Director at the CNRS, and Yann Moalic, Researcher at the Université de Bretagne Occidentale, for reviewing this work. I would like to thank Karine Alain for her support, availability and kindness. Many thanks to Lois Maignien, for his guidance; this work could not have taken place without his advices and its availability. I would also like to thank A. Murat Eren (aka Meren) for its advices, for allowing me to sequence more genomes in this project, and also for hosted me for 1 month in his lab at the University of Chicago. This visit was a very enriching experience. donner accès à des données génomiques supplémentaires, et égalem leUn séQuençage merci particulier de génomes à Patrick via Forterre, Jacques Oberto et Violette Da Cunha de mavoir ent davoir finalisé Je remercie Myriam Georges pourlERC toute EVOMOB)L. son aide apportée lors des manips de bio-mol et pour tous les autres moments. e, et des Thermococcales. MerciUn merci Stéphanie, également pour tonà Nadège aide et taBienvenu bienveillance pour aulutilisation quotidien. de la souchothèqu MerciStéphane à toutes L(aridon les personnes pour ses ayantnombreux participé conseils de près en culture ou de loin à ce travail. du LM2E pour leur disponibilité et leur gentillesse. UnMerci remerciement à lensemble particulierdes membres à la team EcoGenomics, Florian, Clarisse et la nouvelle recrue Blandine, pour toutes les discussions, les réunions du lundi, merci pour ces moments. des thésards, passés, présents, futurs, pour toutes les discussions, soutiens, et bons moments passés ensemble, en commençant par les anciens,Également Gaëlle, à lensemble Sandrine, Matthieu, Simon, Coraline; la génération 2014: Mélanie, Charlène, Vincent, Gwenn et Tiphaine; Les prochains sur la liste: Sébastien, Yang, Caroline, Clarisse, et Florian (encore toi?!); les « jeunes »: Sarah, Jordan, Pierre et les derniers arrivés, Marc, Blandine et David. Je souhaite adresser un sincère merci au FEIRI, et plus particulièrement à Sandy, Frédéric de informatiQue apportée : les debugs de Penduick, Quand . et Emmanuel, pour toute lai Margane, bien Quele mactu sois ne veutpartie plus du démarrer…labo peu après Merci mon arrivée, un grand merci pour tous les bons moments ! Je voudr faire cette thèse. ais également adresser un merci à )van, qui ma longuement aidé et poussé à Enfin je voudrais remercier ma famille, Maman, Papa, Steph, Brigitte, Mathis, Mémé, À ma moitié, pour avoir enduré mes crises et être à mes côtés tous les jours, dans les bonsdavoir et crules autresen moi, moments, je nen serais je ne pas te remercierai là sans vous. jamais assez. Table of contents Acknowledgements List of figures List of tables List of abbreviations Chapter I: Introduction.......................................................................................... 1 I) Introduction of deep-sea hydrothermal vents .................................................... 1 1) Generalities about deep-sea hydrothermal vents ........................................................... 1 2) Deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecology .................................................................................. 4 3) Extremophiles ............................................................................................................................... 7 II) The third domain of life: Archaea ........................................................................... 9 1) Generalities .................................................................................................................................... 9 2) The order Thermococcales ..................................................................................................... 11 III) Ordering microbial diversity in cohesive units ............................................. 17 1) The necessity to classify microorganisms ........................................................................ 17 a) Historical motivations ..................................................................................................... 17 b) Classification of living beings ....................................................................................... 17 2) The actual definition of a microbial species .................................................................... 19 a) The definition ..................................................................................................................... 19 b) How are species delineated? ........................................................................................ 19 i) Sequence similarity .................................................................................................. 19 x DNA-DNA sequence similarity ....................................................................... 19 x Average Nucleotide Identity ........................................................................... 22 ii) Phenotype ................................................................................................................... 23 iii) Additional methods ............................................................................................... 23 c) The lacking parameters: Ecology ................................................................................ 24 i) Species as a group of ecologically coherent isolates ................................... 24 d) Why species definition is still the same? ................................................................. 24 3) What about a new species definition in the genomic era? ......................................... 25 a) Currently, definition does not integrate ecology .................................................. 25 b) How incorporate ecology and genomic data in a more cohesive model? ... 25 4) Instead of thinking species, think population ................................................................. 26 a) Definition of a population .............................................................................................. 26 b) Genomic units: how to cluster genomes? ................................................................ 26 i) Sequence similarity .................................................................................................. 26 ii) Genetic units .............................................................................................................. 27 c) A population is not static ................................................................................................ 27 d) Different models exist ..................................................................................................... 28 i) Based on recombination/selection ratio ........................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Syntrophy Hypothesis for the Origin of Eukaryotes Revisited Purificación López-García, David Moreira

    The Syntrophy Hypothesis for the Origin of Eukaryotes Revisited Purificación López-García, David Moreira

    The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited Purificación López-García, David Moreira To cite this version: Purificación López-García, David Moreira. The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited. Nature Microbiology, Nature Publishing Group, 2020, 5 (5), pp.655-667. 10.1038/s41564- 020-0710-4. hal-02988531 HAL Id: hal-02988531 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02988531 Submitted on 3 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 2 Perspectives 3 4 5 6 The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited 7 8 Purificación López-García1 and David Moreira1 9 10 1 Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France 11 12 13 14 *Correspondence to: [email protected] 15 16 17 18 19 1 20 The discovery of Asgard archaea, phylogenetically closer to eukaryotes than other archaea, together with 21 improved knowledge of microbial ecology impose new constraints on emerging models for the origin of the 22 eukaryotic cell (eukaryogenesis). Long-held views are metamorphosing in favor of symbiogenetic models 23 based on metabolic interactions between archaea and bacteria. These include the classical Searcy’s and 24 hydrogen hypothesis, and the more recent Reverse Flow and Entangle-Engulf-Enslave (E3) models.
  • Phylogenomics Provides Robust Support for a Two-Domains Tree of Life

    Phylogenomics Provides Robust Support for a Two-Domains Tree of Life

    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1040-x Phylogenomics provides robust support for a two-domains tree of life Tom A. Williams! !1*, Cymon J. Cox! !2, Peter G. Foster3, Gergely J. Szöllősi4,5,6 and T. Martin Embley7* Hypotheses about the origin of eukaryotic cells are classically framed within the context of a universal ‘tree of life’ based on conserved core genes. Vigorous ongoing debate about eukaryote origins is based on assertions that the topology of the tree of life depends on the taxa included and the choice and quality of genomic data analysed. Here we have reanalysed the evidence underpinning those claims and apply more data to the question by using supertree and coalescent methods to interrogate >3,000 gene families in archaea and eukaryotes. We find that eukaryotes consistently originate from within the archaea in a two-domains tree when due consideration is given to the fit between model and data. Our analyses support a close relation- ship between eukaryotes and Asgard archaea and identify the Heimdallarchaeota as the current best candidate for the closest archaeal relatives of the eukaryotic nuclear lineage. urrent hypotheses about eukaryotic origins generally pro- Indeed, it has previously been suggested that it is the 3D tree, rather pose at least two partners in that process: a bacterial endo- than the 2D tree, that is an artefact of long-branch attraction5,9–11, symbiont that became the mitochondrion and a host cell for both because analyses under better-fitting models have recovered C 1–4 that endosymbiosis . The identity of the host has been informed a 2D tree but also because the 3D topology is one in which the two by analyses of conserved genes for the transcription and transla- longest branches in the tree of life—the stems leading to bacteria and tion machinery that are considered essential for cellular life5.
  • Thermococcus Piezophilus Sp. Nov., a Novel Hyperthermophilic And

    Thermococcus Piezophilus Sp. Nov., a Novel Hyperthermophilic And

    1 Systematic and Applied Microbiology Achimer October 2016, Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 440-444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2016.08.003 http://archimer.ifremer.fr http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00348/45949/ © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Thermococcus piezophilus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic and piezophilic archaeon with a broad pressure range for growth, isolated from a deepest hydrothermal vent at the Mid-Cayman Rise ✯ Dalmasso Cécile 1, 2, 3, Oger Philippe 4, Selva Gwendoline 1, 2, 3, Courtine Damien 1, 2, 3, L'Haridon Stéphane 1, 2, 3, Garlaschelli Alexandre 1, 2, 3, Roussel Erwan 1, 2, 3, Miyazaki Junichi 5, Reveillaud Julie 1, 2, 3, Jebbar Mohamed 1, 2, 3, Takai Ken 5, Maignien Lois 1, 2, 3, Alain Karine 1, 2, 3, * 1 Université de Bretagne Occidentale (UBO, UEB), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (IUEM) − UMR 6197, Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes (LM2E), Place Nicolas Copernic, F-29280 Plouzané, France 2 CNRS, IUEM − UMR 6197, Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes (LM2E), Place Nicolas Copernic, F-29280 Plouzané, France 3 Ifremer, UMR 6197, Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes (LM2E), Technopôle Pointe du diable, F-29280 Plouzané, France 4 Université de Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS UMR 5240, 11 Avenue Jean Capelle, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France 5 Department of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research (D-SUGAR), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan * Corresponding author : Karine Alain, email address : [email protected] ✯ Note: The EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ 16S rRNA gene sequence accession number of strain CDGST is LN 878294.
  • Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline

    Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline

    Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline • Phlogenetics of Archaea • Phlogenetics of archaeal lipids • Papers Phyla • Two? main phyla – Euryarchaeota • Methanogens • Extreme halophiles • Extreme thermophiles • Sulfate-reducing – Crenarchaeota • Extreme thermophiles – Korarchaeota? • Hyperthermophiles • indicated only by environmental DNA sequences – Nanoarchaeum? • N. equitans a fast evolving euryarchaeal lineage, not novel, early diverging archaeal phylum – Ancient archael group? • In deepest brances of Crenarchaea? Euryarchaea? Archaeal Lipids • Methanogens – Di- and tetra-ethers of glycerol and isoprenoid alcohols – Core mostly archaeol or caldarchaeol – Core sometimes sn-2- or Images removed due to sn-3-hydroxyarchaeol or copyright considerations. macrocyclic archaeol –PMI • Halophiles – Similar to methanogens – Exclusively synthesize bacterioruberin • Marine Crenarchaea Depositional Archaeal Lipids Biological Origin Environment Crocetane methanotrophs? methane seeps? methanogens, PMI (2,6,10,15,19-pentamethylicosane) methanotrophs hypersaline, anoxic Squalane hypersaline? C31-C40 head-to-head isoprenoids Smit & Mushegian • “Lost” enzymes of MVA pathway must exist – Phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK) – Diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase – Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPPI) Kaneda et al. 2001 Rohdich et al. 2001 Boucher et al. • Isoprenoid biosynthesis of archaea evolved through a combination of processes – Co-option of ancestral enzymes – Modification of enzymatic specificity – Orthologous and non-orthologous gene
  • ARCHAEAL EVOLUTION Evolutionary Insights from the Vikings

    ARCHAEAL EVOLUTION Evolutionary Insights from the Vikings

    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nature Reviews Microbiology | Published online 16 Jan 2017; doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.198 ARCHAEAL EVOLUTION Evolutionary insights from the Vikings The emergence of the eukaryotic cell ASGARD — after the invisible the closest known homologue of during evolution gave rise to all com- ‘Gods of Asgard’ in Norse mythology. eukaryotic epsilon DNA polymerases primordial plex life forms on Earth, including The superphylum consists of the identified thus far. eukaryotic multicellular organisms such as ani- previously identified Lokiarchaeota Members of the ASGARD super- mals, plants and fungi. However, the and Thorarchaeota phyla, and the phylum were particularly enriched vesicular and origin of eukaryotes and their char- newly identified Odinarchaeota and for eukaryotic signature proteins trafficking acteristic structural complexity has Heimdallarchaeota phyla. Using that are involved in intracellular components remained a mystery. The most recent phylogenomics, they discovered trafficking and secretion. Several are derived insights into eukaryogenesis support a strong phylogenetic association proteins contained domain signatures the endosymbiotic theory, which between ASGARD lineages and of eukaryotic transport protein from our proposes that the first eukaryotic eukaryotes that placed the eukaryote particle (TRAPP) complexes, which archaeal cell arose from archaea through the lineage in close proximity to the are involved in transport from the ancestor acquisition of an alphaproteobacterial ASGARD superphylum. endoplasmic
  • A Proposal to Rename the Hyperthermophile Pyrococcus Woesei As Pyrococcus Furiosus Subsp

    A Proposal to Rename the Hyperthermophile Pyrococcus Woesei As Pyrococcus Furiosus Subsp

    Archaea 1, 277–283 © 2004 Heron Publishing—Victoria, Canada A proposal to rename the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus woesei as Pyrococcus furiosus subsp. woesei WIROJNE KANOKSILAPATHAM,1 JUAN M. GONZÁLEZ,1,2 DENNIS L. MAEDER,1 1,3 1,4 JOCELYNE DIRUGGIERO and FRANK T. ROBB 1 Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA 2 Present address: IRNAS-CSIC, P.O. Box 1052, 41080 Sevilla, Spain 3 Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20274, USA 4 Corresponding author ([email protected]) Received April 8, 2004; accepted July 28, 2004; published online August 31, 2004 Summary Pyrococcus species are hyperthermophilic mem- relatively rapidly at temperatures above 90 °C and produce ° bers of the order Thermococcales, with optimal growth tem- H2S from elemental sulfur (S ) (Zillig et al. 1987). Two Pyro- peratures approaching 100 °C. All species grow heterotrophic- coccus species, P. furiosus (Fiala and Stetter 1986) and ° ally and produce H2 or, in the presence of elemental sulfur (S ), P. woesei (Zillig et al. 1987), were isolated from marine sedi- H2S. Pyrococcus woesei and P.furiosus were isolated from ma- ments at a Vulcano Island beach site in Italy. They have similar rine sediments at the same Vulcano Island beach site and share morphological and physiological characteristics: both species many morphological and physiological characteristics. We re- are cocci and move by means of a tuft of polar flagella. They port here that the rDNA operons of these strains have identical are heterotrophic and grow optimally at 95–100 °C, utilizing sequences, including their intergenic spacer regions and part of peptides as major carbon and nitrogen sources.
  • Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication

    Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication

    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Kira S. Makarova and Eugene V. Koonin National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894 Correspondence: [email protected] Recent advances in the characterization of the archaeal DNA replication system together with comparative genomic analysis have led to the identification of several previously un- characterized archaeal proteins involved in replication and currently reveal a nearly com- plete correspondence between the components of the archaeal and eukaryotic replication machineries. It can be inferred that the archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes and even the last common ancestor of all extant archaea possessed replication machineries that were compa- rable in complexity to the eukaryotic replication system. The eukaryotic replication system encompasses multiple paralogs of ancestral components such that heteromeric complexes in eukaryotes replace archaeal homomeric complexes, apparently along with subfunctionali- zation of the eukaryotic complex subunits. In the archaea, parallel, lineage-specific dupli- cations of many genes encoding replication machinery components are detectable as well; most of these archaeal paralogs remain to be functionally characterized. The archaeal rep- lication system shows remarkable plasticity whereby even some essential components such as DNA polymerase and single-stranded DNA-binding protein are displaced by unrelated proteins with analogous activities in some lineages. ouble-stranded DNA is the molecule that Okazaki fragments (Kornberg and Baker 2005; Dcarries genetic information in all cellular Barry and Bell 2006; Hamdan and Richardson life-forms; thus, replication of this genetic ma- 2009; Hamdan and van Oijen 2010).
  • Functionalized Membrane Domains: an Ancestral Feature of Archaea? Maxime Tourte, Philippe Schaeffer, Vincent Grossi, Phil Oger

    Functionalized Membrane Domains: an Ancestral Feature of Archaea? Maxime Tourte, Philippe Schaeffer, Vincent Grossi, Phil Oger

    Functionalized Membrane Domains: An Ancestral Feature of Archaea? Maxime Tourte, Philippe Schaeffer, Vincent Grossi, Phil Oger To cite this version: Maxime Tourte, Philippe Schaeffer, Vincent Grossi, Phil Oger. Functionalized Membrane Domains: An Ancestral Feature of Archaea?. Frontiers in Microbiology, Frontiers Media, 2020, 11, pp.526. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00526. hal-02553764 HAL Id: hal-02553764 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02553764 Submitted on 20 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. fmicb-11-00526 March 30, 2020 Time: 21:44 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 31 March 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00526 Functionalized Membrane Domains: An Ancestral Feature of Archaea? Maxime Tourte1†, Philippe Schaeffer2†, Vincent Grossi3† and Phil M. Oger1*† 1 Université de Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS, MAP UMR 5240, Villeurbanne, France, 2 Université de Strasbourg-CNRS, UMR 7177, Laboratoire de Biogéochimie Moléculaire, Strasbourg, France, 3 Université de Lyon, ENS Lyon, CNRS, Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon, UMR 5276, Villeurbanne, France Bacteria and Eukarya organize their plasma membrane spatially into domains of distinct functions. Due to the uniqueness of their lipids, membrane functionalization in Archaea remains a debated area.
  • And Thermo-Adaptation in Hyperthermophilic Archaea: Identification of Compatible Solutes, Accumulation Profiles, and Biosynthetic Routes in Archaeoglobus Spp

    And Thermo-Adaptation in Hyperthermophilic Archaea: Identification of Compatible Solutes, Accumulation Profiles, and Biosynthetic Routes in Archaeoglobus Spp

    Universidade Nova de Lisboa Osmo- andInstituto thermo de Tecnologia-adaptation Química e Biológica in hyperthermophilic Archaea: Subtitle Subtitle Luís Pedro Gafeira Gonçalves Osmo- and thermo-adaptation in hyperthermophilic Archaea: identification of compatible solutes, accumulation profiles, and biosynthetic routes in Archaeoglobus spp. OH OH OH CDP c c c - CMP O O - PPi O3P P CTP O O O OH OH OH OH OH OH O- C C C O P O O P i Dissertation presented to obtain the Ph.D degree in BiochemistryO O- Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica | Universidade Nova de LisboaP OH O O OH OH OH Oeiras, Luís Pedro Gafeira Gonçalves January, 2008 2008 Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica Osmo- and thermo-adaptation in hyperthermophilic Archaea: identification of compatible solutes, accumulation profiles, and biosynthetic routes in Archaeoglobus spp. This dissertation was presented to obtain a Ph. D. degree in Biochemistry at the Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. By Luís Pedro Gafeira Gonçalves Supervised by Prof. Dr. Helena Santos Oeiras, January, 2008 Apoio financeiro da Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (POCI 2010 – Formação Avançada para a Ciência – Medida IV.3) e FSE no âmbito do Quadro Comunitário de apoio, Bolsa de Doutoramento com a referência SFRH / BD / 5076 / 2001. ii ACKNOWNLEDGMENTS The work presented in this thesis, would not have been possible without the help, in terms of time and knowledge, of many people, to whom I am extremely grateful. Firstly and mostly, I need to thank my supervisor, Prof. Helena Santos, for her way of thinking science, her knowledge, her rigorous criticism, and her commitment to science.
  • Different Proteins Mediate Step-Wise Chromosome Architectures in 2 Thermoplasma Acidophilum and Pyrobaculum Calidifontis

    Different Proteins Mediate Step-Wise Chromosome Architectures in 2 Thermoplasma Acidophilum and Pyrobaculum Calidifontis

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.13.982959; this version posted May 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Different Proteins Mediate Step-wise Chromosome Architectures in 2 Thermoplasma acidophilum and Pyrobaculum calidifontis 3 4 5 Hugo Maruyama1†*, Eloise I. Prieto2†, Takayuki Nambu1, Chiho Mashimo1, Kosuke 6 Kashiwagi3, Toshinori Okinaga1, Haruyuki Atomi4, Kunio Takeyasu5 7 8 1 Department of Bacteriology, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan 9 2 National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of the Philippines 10 Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines 11 3 Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan 12 4 Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, 13 Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 14 5 Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 15 † These authors have contributed equally to this work 16 17 * Correspondence: 18 Hugo Maruyama 19 [email protected]; [email protected] 20 21 Keywords: archaea, higher-order chromosome structure, nucleoid, chromatin, HTa, histone, 22 transcriptional regulator, horizontal gene transfer 23 Running Title: Step-wise chromosome architecture in Archaea 24 Manuscript length: 6955 words 25 Number of Figures: 7 26 Number of Tables: 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.13.982959; this version posted May 4, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • Pan-Genome Analysis and Ancestral State Reconstruction Of

    Pan-Genome Analysis and Ancestral State Reconstruction Of

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Pan‑genome analysis and ancestral state reconstruction of class halobacteria: probability of a new super‑order Sonam Gaba1,2, Abha Kumari2, Marnix Medema 3 & Rajeev Kaushik1* Halobacteria, a class of Euryarchaeota are extremely halophilic archaea that can adapt to a wide range of salt concentration generally from 10% NaCl to saturated salt concentration of 32% NaCl. It consists of the orders: Halobacteriales, Haloferaciales and Natriabales. Pan‑genome analysis of class Halobacteria was done to explore the core (300) and variable components (Softcore: 998, Cloud:36531, Shell:11784). The core component revealed genes of replication, transcription, translation and repair, whereas the variable component had a major portion of environmental information processing. The pan‑gene matrix was mapped onto the core‑gene tree to fnd the ancestral (44.8%) and derived genes (55.1%) of the Last Common Ancestor of Halobacteria. A High percentage of derived genes along with presence of transformation and conjugation genes indicate the occurrence of horizontal gene transfer during the evolution of Halobacteria. A Core and pan‑gene tree were also constructed to infer a phylogeny which implicated on the new super‑order comprising of Natrialbales and Halobacteriales. Halobacteria1,2 is a class of phylum Euryarchaeota3 consisting of extremely halophilic archaea found till date and contains three orders namely Halobacteriales4,5 Haloferacales5 and Natrialbales5. Tese microorganisms are able to dwell at wide range of salt concentration generally from 10% NaCl to saturated salt concentration of 32% NaCl6. Halobacteria, as the name suggests were once considered a part of a domain "Bacteria" but with the discovery of the third domain "Archaea" by Carl Woese et al.7, it became part of Archaea.
  • Role of Ori in Thermococcus Barophilus

    Role of Ori in Thermococcus Barophilus

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.27.441579; this version posted April 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Role of Ori in Thermococcus barophilus 2 3 Yann Moalic1, Ryan Catchpole2, Elodie Leroy1, Logan Mc Teer1, Valérie Cueff-Gauchard1, 4 Johanne Aubé1, Yang Lu1, Erwan Roussel1, Jacques Oberto2, Didier Flament1 and Rémi 5 Dulermo1* 6 7 1Univ Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, Laboratoire de Microbiologie des Environnements Extrêmes, F- 8 29280 Plouzané, France. 9 2Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 10 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 11 12 13 *Corresponding author; Tel: +33298224398; Email: [email protected] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Keywords: Thermococcus kodakarensis, Ori, RDR, Recombination-dependent replication, 21 DNA replication 22 23 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.27.441579; this version posted April 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 25 Summary 26 27 The mechanisms underpinning replication of genomic DNA in Archaea have recently been 28 challenged. Species belonging to two different taxonomic orders grow well in the absence of 29 an origin of replication, challenging the role of the replication origin in these organisms.