DOCSLIB.ORG

Mid-Term Review FINAL Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mid-Term Review FINAL Report “Conservation and Sustainable Use of Pamir Alay and Tien Shan Ecosystems for Snow Leopard Protection and Sustainable Community Livelihoods” - Tajikistan Mid-Term Review FINAL Report GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Implementing Partner: National Biodiversity and Biosafety Centre (NBBC) Funding: GEF GEF Project ID: 6949 UNDP PIMS: 5437 UNDP Atlas Project ID: 00092973 Project Timeline: August 2016 – August 2021 Submitted by: Jean-Joseph Bellamy & Tahmina Akhmedova Submitted on February 13, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................... 7 2. REVIEW FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.1. OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.1. Overall Approach ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2. Review Instruments ................................................................................................................... 10 2.4. MTR USERS ................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.5. LIMITATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................................................. 11 3. EVALUATION FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1. PROJECT STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1. Project Design ............................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.2. Results Framework / Log-frame .............................................................................................. 16 3.2. PROGRESS TOWARDS RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.1. Progress Towards Outcomes Analysis................................................................................... 19 3.2.2. Remaining Barriers to Achieve the Project Objective .......................................................... 30 3.3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 31 3.3.1. Management Arrangements ..................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2. Stakeholder Engagement ......................................................................................................... 33 3.3.3. Work Planning ............................................................................................................................ 35 3.3.4. Finance and Co-finance ............................................................................................................ 35 3.3.5. Project-level Monitoring and Evaluation Systems................................................................. 38 3.3.6. Reporting ..................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3.7. Communications / Knowledge Management ......................................................................... 42 3.4. SUSTAINABILITY .......................................................................................................................................... 44 3.4.1. Financial risk to Sustainability .................................................................................................. 45 3.4.2. Socio-economic risk to Sustainability ..................................................................................... 45 3.4.3. Institutional framework and governance risk to Sustainability ............................................ 45 3.4.4. Environmental risk to Sustainability ........................................................................................ 45 4. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED .......................................................... 46 4.1. CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 46 4.2. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 50 4.3. LESSONS LEARNT ......................................................................................................................................... 53 ANNEX 1: MAP OF SNOW LEOPARD LANDSCAPES .............................................................................................. 54 ANNEX 2: PROJECT EXPECTED RESULTS AND PLANNED ACTIVITIES ........................................................... 55 ANNEX 3: MTR TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................................... 62 ANNEX 4: UNEG CODE OF CONDUCT FOR REVIEWERS AND AGREEMENT FORM ...................................... 68 ANNEX 5: MID-TERM REVIEW MATRIX .................................................................................................................. 69 ANNEX 6: LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED ......................................................................................................... 76 ANNEX 7: INTERVIEW GUIDE .................................................................................................................................... 79 ANNEX 8: FACT-FINDING MISSION AGENDA ........................................................................................................ 81 ANNEX 9: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED ............................................................................................................. 87 ANNEX 10: INITIAL LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................................... 90 ANNEX 11: MTR RATING SCALES ............................................................................................................................. 92 ANNEX 12: AUDIT TRAIL.............................................................................................................................................. 93 ANNEX 13: EVALUATION REPORT CLEARANCE FORM ....................................................................................... 94 Mid-term Review of the UNDP-GEF-Government of Tajikistan Project “Conservation and Sustainable Use of Pamir Alay and Tien Shan Ecosystems for Snow Leopard Protection and Sustainable Community Livelihoods” Tajikistan (PIMS 5437) i List of Tables Table 1: Project Information Table .................................................................................................................... 2 Table 2: MTR Ratings and Achievement Summary Table ................................................................................ 6 Table 3: Steps Used to Conduct the Evaluation ............................................................................................. 10 Table 4: Project Logic Model ........................................................................................................................... 17 Table 5: List of Delivered Results.................................................................................................................... 20 Table 6: METT Scores..................................................................................................................................... 28 Table 7: List of Stakeholders Engaged in the Implementation of the Project ................................................. 33 Table 8: Annual Work Plans versus Actual Expenditures (GEF grant)........................................................... 35 Table 9: UNDP-GEF Project Funds Disbursement Status (GEF Grant in USD) ............................................ 36 Table 10: Co-financing Status ......................................................................................................................... 37 Table 11: List of Performance Indicators .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry
    The Republic of Tajikistan Ministry of Energy and Industry DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON THE INSTALLMENT OF SMALL HYDROPOWER STATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITIES OF KHATLON OBLAST IN THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FINAL REPORT September 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency NEWJEC Inc. E C C CR (1) 12-005 Final Report Contents, List of Figures, Abbreviations Data Collection Survey on the Installment of Small Hydropower Stations for the Communities of Khatlon Oblast in the Republic of Tajikistan FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Summary Chapter 1 Preface 1.1 Objectives and Scope of the Study .................................................................................. 1 - 1 1.2 Arrangement of Small Hydropower Potential Sites ......................................................... 1 - 2 1.3 Flowchart of the Study Implementation ........................................................................... 1 - 7 Chapter 2 Overview of Energy Situation in Tajikistan 2.1 Economic Activities and Electricity ................................................................................ 2 - 1 2.1.1 Social and Economic situation in Tajikistan ....................................................... 2 - 1 2.1.2 Energy and Electricity ......................................................................................... 2 - 2 2.1.3 Current Situation and Planning for Power Development .................................... 2 - 9 2.2 Natural Condition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TAJIKISTAN TAJIKISTAN Country – Livestock
    APPENDIX 15 TAJIKISTAN 870 км TAJIKISTAN 414 км Sangimurod Murvatulloev 1161 км Dushanbe,Tajikistan / [email protected] Tel: (992 93) 570 07 11 Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) 1206 км Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran 3 651 . 9 - 13 November 2008 Общая протяженность границы км Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) TAJIKISTAN Country – Livestock - 2007 Territory - 143.000 square km Cities Dushanbe – 600.000 Small Population – 7 mln. Khujand – 370.000 Capital – Dushanbe Province Cattle Dairy Cattle ruminants Yak Kurgantube – 260.000 Official language - tajiki Kulob – 150.000 Total in Ethnic groups Tajik – 75% Tajikistan 1422614 756615 3172611 15131 Uzbek – 20% Russian – 3% Others – 2% GBAO 93619 33069 267112 14261 Sughd 388486 210970 980853 586 Khatlon 573472 314592 1247475 0 DRD 367037 197984 677171 0 Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy Regional meeting on Foot-and-Mouth Disease to develop a long term Regional control strategy (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) (Regional Roadmap for West Eurasia) Country – Livestock - 2007 Current FMD Situation and Trends Density of sheep and goats Prevalence of FM D population in Tajikistan Quantity of beans Mastchoh Asht 12827 - 21928 12 - 30 Ghafurov 21929 - 35698 31 - 46 Spitamen Zafarobod Konibodom 35699 - 54647 Spitamen Isfara M astchoh A sht 47
    [Show full text]
  • 46543-002: CAREC Corridors 3 and 5 Enhancement Project
    Initial Environment Examination Project No.: 46543-002 July 2019 Tajikistan: Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 3 and 5 Enhancement Project Kangurt to Baljuvon to intersection Vose-Khovaling Road Updated IEE Study Prepared by: SMEC International (Pty) Ltd, Australia for the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Asian Development Bank. This initial environment examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CAREC Corridors 3 and 5 Enhancement Project: Contract for Engineering, Works Supervision and Project Management Services Grant 0356-TAJ _____________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Description of the Project .................................................................................................... 2 3. Overview of the Receiving Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss-Tajik Cooperation: Nearly 20 Years of Primary Healthcare Development
    Swiss-Tajik Cooperation: Nearly 20 years of Primary Healthcare Development Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Population of the Republic of Tajikistan Swiss-Tajik Collaboration: Nearly 20 years of Primary Healthcare Development With high levels of poverty and two thirds of its nurses. This was achieved by putting greater people living in rural areas, Tajikistan’s primary focus on practical, clinical skills, communica- health care system and the quality education of tion techniques and providing early exposure its health workers are essential to make health to rural practice realities, with students working care more accessible. The Enhancing Primary directly with patients under the guidance of ex- Health Care Services Project (Project Sino) and perienced colleagues – as is routinely done in the Medical Education Reform Project (MEP) Switzerland. have been committed to the pursuit of Univer- To achieve the health-related Sustaina- sal Health Coverage (UHC) through develop- ble Development Goals, Switzerland promotes ment of the health system and medical educa- UHC through activities that establish social pro- tion reform for close to 20 years. The projects tection mechanisms in health and advocate for are supported by the Swiss Agency for De- access to quality healthcare. SDC in particular velopment and Cooperation (SDC) and imple- supports the drive towards UHC and that atten- Swiss-Tajik Cooperation: mented by the Swiss Tropical and Public Health tion is paid to the needs of the poor, such as the Nearly 20 years of Primary Institute (Swiss TPH). assistance provided in Tajikistan. Healthcare Development The projects were conceived to sup- port, and work directly with, the Ministry of Russia Health and Social Protection (MoHSP), the Re- p.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Situation on Inclusive Education for People with Disabilities in the Republic of Tajikistan Report on the Results of the Baseline Research
    Public Organization - League of women with disabilities «Ishtirok» April - July 2018 Analysis of the situation on inclusive education for people with disabilities in the Republic of Tajikistan Report on the results of the baseline research 1 EXPRESSION OF APPRECIATION A basic study on the inclusive education of people with disabilities in the Republic of Tajikistan (RT) conducted by the Public Organization Disabled Women's League “Ishtirok”. This study was conducted under financial support from ASIA SOUTH PACIFIC ASSOCIATION FOR BASIC AND ADULT EDUCATION (ASPBAE) The research team expresses special thanks to the Executive Office of the President of the RT for assistance in collecting data at the national, regional, and district levels. In addition, we express our gratitude for the timely provision of data to the Centre for adult education of Tajikistan of the Ministry of labor, migration, and employment of population of RT, the Ministry of education and science of RT. We express our deep gratitude to all public organizations, departments of social protection and education in the cities of Dushanbe, Bokhtar, Khujand, Konibodom, and Vahdat. Moreover, we are grateful to all parents of children with disabilities, secondary school teachers, teachers of primary and secondary vocational education, who have made a significant contribution to the collection of high-quality data on the development of the situation of inclusive education for persons with disabilities in the country. Research team: Saida Inoyatova – coordinator, director, Public Organization - League of women with disabilities «Ishtirok»; Salomat Asoeva – Assistant Coordinator, Public Organization - League of women with disabilities «Ishtirok»; Larisa Alexandrova – lawyer, director of the Public Foundation “Your Choice”; Margarita Khegay – socio-economist, candidate of economic sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Tajikistan
    E4132 REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods Project (ELMARL) Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized December 2012 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary. ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Country Context ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2. Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Key Results .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties in Tajikistan (Facts, Figures and Analysis): Final Draft Document Date: 2002
    Date Printed: 11/06/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 12 Tab Number: 6 Document Title: Political Parties in Tajikistan (Facts, Figures and Analysis): Final Draft Document Date: 2002 Document Country: Tajikistan 1FES 10: R0188? I~ * . ..~; 1 ' ·• .......................••••••••••••••••• -II · .. • ••• ~ • ..-~~~~! - ~ •.••;;;;; __ I •••• - -- -----=-= ___ • BS·· •••• ~ : :: .. ::::: -• - ••-- ·"'!I'I~···; .~ . ----• ••• . ., ••••••••••••••••• • ••••••••••••••••• • = ••••••••••••••••• !.a ••••••••••••••••• ~ :~:::::::::::::::::~ .~ ••••••••••••••••• ~ • •••••••••••••••••• :-::::::::::=~=~~::~ :o:::::::::~mLlg~::: • ••••••••• ~ t •••••• - ••••••••• ••• •• ------ --- -~~~ --- _. ••••••••••••••••••••• • •.• • • • • • ~~Wllifu. I IFES MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of IFES is to provide technical assistance in the promotion of democracy worldwide and to serve as a clearinghouse for information about democratic development and elections. IFES is dedicated to the success of democracy throughout the world, believing that it is the preferred form of gov­ ernment. At the same time, IFES firmly believes that each nation requesting > assistance must take into consideration its unique social, cultural, and envi- ronmental influences. The Foundation recognizes that democracy is a dynam­ ic process with no single blueprint. IFES is nonpartisan, multinational, and inter­ disciplinary in its approach. POLITICAL PARTIES IN TAJIKISTAN Facts, Figures, and Analysis FINAL DRAFT Dr. Saodat Olimova Anthony Bowyer November 2002 Prepared by the International Foundation for
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Business Planning in Primary Care Facilities in Tajikistan
    2019 Assessment of business planning in primary care facilities in Tajikistan Assessment of business planning in primary care facilities in Tajikistan Abstract This report presents the main findings and recommendations of the assessment of the business planning implementation in primary health care facilities in Tajikistan. Since it was introduced in 2005, business planning in Tajikistan has grown into a nationally adopted mechanism for strengthening district and primary health care facility management. In 2019, an assessment took place to evaluate the results of the business planning implementation. The findings revealed that business planning was regarded as an efective managerial tool that improved the health of and relationships with the populations served. The most important outcome of business planning is the reported improved responsiveness to the health needs of the population, especially more vulnerable groups. Implementation of business planning has increased the transparency of the health facilities’ activities and resources and has strengthened the primary care management capacity. Nevertheless, the health system has challenges afecting the success of business planning that need to be addressed for its further success and sustainability in the country. Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Ofce for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Ofce for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Ofce website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). Document number: WHO/EURO:2020-1518-41268-56164 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
    [Show full text]
  • Formative Research on Infant and Young Child Feeding
    FORMATIVE RESEARCH ON INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING Final Report AND MATERNAL NUTRITION 2016 IN TAJIKISTAN Conducted by Dornsife School of Public Health & College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA For UNICEF Tajikistan Under Drexel’s Long Term Agreement for Services In Communication for Development (C4D) with UNICEF And Contract # 43192550 January 11 through November 30, 2016 Principal Investigator Ann C Klassen, PhD , Professor, Department of Community Health and Prevention Co-Investigators Brandy Joe Milliron PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences Beth Leonberg, MA, MS, RD – Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences Graduate Research Staff Lisa Bossert, MPH, Margaret Chenault, MS, Suzanne Grossman, MSc, Jalal Maqsood, MD Professional Translation Staff Rauf Abduzhalilov, Shokhin Asadov, Malika Iskandari, Muhiddin Tojiev This research is conducted with the financial support of the Government of the Russian Federation Appendices : (Available Separately) Additional Bibliography Data Collector Training, Dushanbe, March, 2016 Data Collection Instruments Drexel Presentations at National Nutrition Forum, Dushanbe, July, 2016 cover page photo © mromanyuk/2014 FORMATIVE RESEARCH ON INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING AND MATERNAL NUTRITION IN TAJIKISTAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Executive Summary 5 Section 2: Overview of Project 12 Section 3: Review of the Literature 65 Section 4: Field Work Report 75 Section 4a: Methods 86 Section 4b: Results 101 Section 5: Conclusions and Recommendations 120 Section 6: Literature Cited 138 FORMATIVE RESEARCH ON INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING FORMATIVE RESEARCH ON INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING 3 AND MATERNAL NUTRITION IN TAJIKISTAN AND MATERNAL NUTRITION IN TAJIKISTAN SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Tajikistan is a mountainous, primarily rural country of approximately 8 million residents in Central Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No: ICR00002755
    Document of The World Bank Report No: ICR00002755 Public Disclosure Authorized IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA-43140) ON A CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 10 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$ 15 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN FOR A COTTON SECTOR RECOVERY PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized September 25, 2013 Sustainable Development Department Central Asia Country Unit Public Disclosure Authorized Europe and Central Asia Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective August 21, 2013) Currency Unit = Somoni US$ 1.00 = 4.7665 Tajikistan Somoni (TJS) FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank AIB Agroinvestbank CSRP Cotton Sector Recovery Project DAT Debt analysis team DF Dehkan Farm DFID Department for Foreign International Development DLC District Land Committee DRA Debt restructuring agency FSP Farmer Support Program FPA Final Project Assessment IC Independent Commission JDC Jamoat Development Council JPIU Joint Project Implementation Unit KI Kredit Invest LRCSSAP Land Registration and Cadaster System for Sustainable Agriculture Project M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoF Ministry of Finance NBT National Bank of Tajikistan NGO Non-governmental organization PFI Participating Financial Institution PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper RRS Raions of Republic Subordination SCLRM State Committee for Land Resources and Management SCSSP Sustainable Cotton Sub-Sector Project (Asian Development Bank) SIDA Swedish International Development Association SMP Staff Monitored Program TIC Training and Information Center TSBLSS Tojiksodirotbank Acting Vice President: Laura Tuck Country Director: Saroj Kumar Jha Sector Manager: Dina Umali-Deininger Project/ICR Team Leader: Bobojon Yatimov ICR Author: Malathi Jayawickrama ii TAJIKISTAN COTTON SECTOR RECOVERY PROJECT CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Forest Management (JFM)
    Joint Forest Management Manual for facilitators, NGOs and projects based on Experience with implementing participatory forest management as practiced in Tajikistan between 2006 and 2015 Content Abbreviation ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Explanation of terms used ...................................................................................................................... 7 1. Background .................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Introducing Joint Forest Management to the community ............................................................... 13 2.1. Field Visit ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.2. Information Seminar ........................................................................................................... 16 2.3. Community agreement ....................................................................................................... 19 2.4. Definition and demarcation of JFM plots ............................................................................ 20 2.5. Selection of forest users ....................................................................................................... 22 2.6. JFM contract ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 2, 3, and 5 (Obigarm-Nurobod) Road Project: Report and Recommendation of Th
    Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 52042-001 November 2019 Proposed Grant Republic of Tajikistan: Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 2, 3, and 5 (Obigarm–Nurobod) Road Project Distribution of this document is restricted until it has been approved by the Board of Directors. Following such approval, ADB will disclose the document to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 17 October 2019) Currency unit – somoni (TJS) TJS1.00 = $0.1032 $1.00 = TJS9.6911 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AIIB – Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank CAREC – Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CSC – construction supervision consultant EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EMP – environmental management plan GAP – gender action plan km – kilometer LARP – land acquisition and resettlement plan m – meter MOT – Ministry of Transport OFID – OPEC Fund for International Development PAM – project administration manual PBM – performance-based maintenance PCC – project coordinating committee PIURR – Project Implementation Unit for Roads Rehabilitation PMC – project management consultant PPRA – project procurement risk assessment NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. Vice-President Shixin Chen, Operations 1 Director General Werner Liepach, Central and West Asia Department (CWRD) Director Dong-Soo Pyo, Transport and Communications Division, CWRD Team leader Kamel Bouhmad, Transport Specialist, CWRD
    [Show full text]