DOCSLIB.ORG

COFA for 60 Hudson Street, Manhattan, Docket 046281

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COFA for 60 Hudson Street, Manhattan, Docket 046281 THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1 CENTRE STREET 9TH FLOOR NORTH NEW YORK NY 10007 TEL: 212 669-7700 FAX: 212 669-7780 PERMIT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ISSUE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: DOCKET #: COFA #: 02/08/2006 04-6281 COFA 06-5630 ADDRESS BOROUGH: BLOCK/LOT: 60 HUDSON STREET INDIVIDUAL LANDMARK WESTERN UNION BUILDING MANHATTAN 144/40 Display This Permit While Work Is In Progress ISSUED TO: Shaun Mooney Hudson Telegraph Associates c/o GVA Williams 60 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation Commission, at the Public Meeting of December 13, 2005, following the Public Meeting of June 21, 2005, and the Public Hearing and Public Meeting of May 25, 2004, voted to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed work at the subject premises, as put forth in your application completed April 22, 2004. The proposed work, as approved, consists of establishing a building-wide master plan governing the future installation of HVAC louvers within existing storefront framing and window sash, excluding certain windows; the installation of mechanical equipment at building setbacks; the installation of telecommunications equipment within a rooftop transmission tower; and the installation of shadow boxes behind the storefronts on West Broadway and Hudson Street, as shown in drawings, photographs and photo montages, labeled LM.5, LM.6 and LM.14, received at the Commission May 2004, LM.1 through LM.4, LM.9 through LM.12, and LM.16 through LM.25, received at the Commission June 2005, LM.7A, LM.8A, LM.15, LM.26, LM.33, A.1 through A.8, and "Typical Diagram For Each of 3 Faces," received at the Commission December 2005, prepared by George Boyle, Architect, submitted as components of the application and presented at the Public Hearing and Public Meetings. As originally presented to the Commission, the proposal featured window louver installations in an undefined pattern, dark shades behind windows without louvers, and the use of an overlay grid on the louvers, as shown in drawings labeled LM.7, LM.8, and LM.15, received at the Commission May 2004. In reviewing the proposal, the Commission noted that the designation report for 60 Hudson Street, the Western Union Building, describes it as an Art Deco style communications building built in 1928-30, and designed by Ralph Walker; and that the style, scale, materials and details of the buildings are among the features that contributes to the special architectural and historic character of this Individual Landmark. The Commission further noted that Certificate of Appropriateness 98-0166 was issued July 11, 1997 for a master plan for window and storefront louvers; that Miscellaneous/Amendment 01-5018 was issued March 5, 2001 to allow for the installation of generator muffler pipes in the upper right corner of approved window louvers; that the light "smoke gray" color previously approved for the window louvers will continue to be used in the new master plan; and that the shadow boxes will be installed in the Hudson Street storefronts upon a change in tenancy. With regard to this proposal, the Commission found that the chevron design of the storefront louvers will be compatible with the building's Art Deco ornamentation; that the proposed color of the storefront louver will be harmonious with the brick facade; that the patterns proposed for new window louver installations relate well to and complement the design of each facade; that confining louvers to certain portions of the facades will ensure that such installations occur in an orderly manner; that the installation of the louvers will enable the building, originally designed for the communications industry, to continue to function in its historic capacity; that installing the new window louvers behind the historic windows will maintain historic fabric; that lengthening four existing window openings on the Thomas Street façade at the ground floor, will be consistent with the size of the majority of the ground floor windows on that façade; that the amount of historic building fabric that will be removed will be minimal and will not detract from the special architectural character of the landmark; that the new ground floor Thomas Street windows, as well as any other new windows in which new louvers will be installed, will match the material, configuration, details, operation and finish of the historic windows; that the use of illuminated shadow boxes at the West Broadway storefront windows will enliven the building's base, and will give them a three-dimensionality that will recall the presence of storefronts; that the plan for the location and size of equipment at the building's setbacks will create a more controlled and orderly approach to the installation of the equipment, limiting the sizes of future units; that painting the equipment on the setback to match the different color of the brick at different levels of the facades will allow it to blend in better with the facades, calling less attention to it; that the design of the proposed transmission tower will better relate to the verticality of the building's design than the existing rooftop equipment which it will replace; that installing telecommunications equipment within the tower, rather than on its exterior, will allow for the orderly expansion of equipment while maintaining the external appearance of the tower; and that the proposed new Master Plan deals with the building in a comprehensive manner that will allow for necessary equipment installations without compromising the integrity of the landmark. Based on these findings, the Commission determined the work to be appropriate to the landmark and voted to approve it. The Commission authorized the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness upon receipt, review and approval of copies of the final drawings for the approved work. Subsequently, the staff of the Commission received drawings A.1 through A.7, dated January 12, 2006, and LPC.1, dated January 31, 2006, prepared by George Boyle, Architect, and an e-mail from the office of George Boyle, Architect, dated February 2, 2006 indicating that the storefront louvers will be painted to match Benjamin Moore "Hodley Red" #HC-65. The Commission reviewed these materials and found that the proposal approved by the Commission has been maintained. Based on this and the above findings, the drawings have been marked approved by the LPC with a perforated seal and Certificate of Appropriateness 06-5630 is being issued. This master plan sets a standard for the future installation of storefront and window louvers, mechanical equipment at setbacks, the installation of telecommunications equipment within a rooftop transmission tower, and the installation of shadow boxes behind the West Broadway and Hudson Street storefronts, and specifically identifies drawings which describe the approved master plan in detail. If the owner wishes to move forward with a portion of the work covered by the master plan, a completed application form must be filed with the Commission indicating the specific location(s) of the proposed work and showing that the work will conform to the approved master plan drawings and other documents on file with the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The staff of the Preservation Department will review the application to ascertain that all proposed work is covered by the master plan, and will then send the owner an Authorization to Proceed. The Authorization to Proceed will be sent prior to the commencement of the work and will be contingent on adherence to the approved master plan. Please note that this master plan supersedes the master plan approved under Certificate of Appropriateness 98-0166; and that Misecellaneous/Amendment 01-5018 applies to the new master plan. This permit is issued on the basis of the building and site conditions described in the application and disclosed PAGE 2 Issued: 2/8/06 DOCKET: 04-6281 during the review process. By accepting this permit, the applicant agrees to notify the Commission if the actual building or site conditions vary or if original or historic building fabric is discovered. The Commission reserves the right to amend or revoke this permit, upon written notice to the applicant, in the event that the actual building or site conditions are materially different from those described in the application or disclosed during the review process. All approved drawings are marked approved by the Commission with a perforated seal indicating the date of approval. The work is limited to what is contained in the perforated documents. Other work or amendments to this filing must be reviewed and approved separately. The applicant is hereby put on notice that performing or maintaining any work not explicitly authorized by this permit may make the applicant liable for criminal and/or civil penalties, including imprisonment and fines. This letter constitutes the permit; a copy must be prominently displayed at the site while work is in progress. Please direct inquiries to Lisa Schaeffer. Robert B. Tierney Chair PLEASE NOTE: PERFORATED DRAWINGS AND A COPY OF THIS PERMIT HAVE BEEN SENT TO: George Boyle, Architect cc: G. Boyle, Arch. PAGE 3 Issued: 2/8/06 DOCKET: 04-6281.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amazon's Document
    REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Project Clancy TALENT A. Big Questions and Big Ideas 1. Population Changes and Key Drivers. a. Population level - Specify the changes in total population in your community and state over the last five years and the major reasons for these changes. Please also identify the majority source of inbound migration. Ne Yok Cit’s populatio ge fo . illio to . illio oe the last fie eas ad is projected to surpass 9 million by 2030.1 New York City continues to attract a dynamic and diverse population of professionals, students, and families of all backgrounds, mainly from Latin America (including the Caribbean, Central America, and South America), China, and Eastern Europe.2 Estiate of Ne York City’s Populatio Year Population 2011 8,244,910 2012 8,336,697 2013 8,405,837 2014 8,491,079 2015 8,550,405 2016 8,537,673 Source: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Cumulative Estimates of the Components of Population Change for New York City and Counties Time period: April 1, 2010 - July 1, 2016 Total Natural Net Net Net Geographic Area Population Increase Migration: Migration: Migration: Change (Births-Deaths) Total Domestic International New York City Total 362,540 401,943 -24,467 -524,013 499,546 Bronx 70,612 75,607 -3,358 -103,923 100,565 Brooklyn 124,450 160,580 -32,277 -169,064 136,787 Manhattan 57,861 54,522 7,189 -91,811 99,000 1 New York City Population Projections by Age/Sex & Borough, 2010-2040 2 Place of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population in 2012-2016, American Community Survey PROJECT CLANCY PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL 4840-0257-2381.3 1 Queens 102,332 99,703 7,203 -148,045 155,248 Staten Island 7,285 11,531 -3,224 -11,170 7,946 Source: Population Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization | Supplement
    >Modernization | Supplement Modernized by ™ The hidden data The birthplace of Data center Inside Intel: From center sector the Internet surgery fab to data center > Why build new, when > First came AOL, then > Changing a live > They used it to you can upgrade what Infomart; now it's time facility without going build chips. Now it's you already have? for Stack Infrastructure down isn't easy simulating them INSIDE EcoStruxureINSIGHTS IT delivers into your data center architecture. Looking for a better way to manage your data centers in the cloud and at the edge? EcoStruxure™ IT — the world’s first cloud-based DCIM — delivers visibility and actionable insights, anywhere, any time. ecostruxureit.com ©2019 Schneider Electric. All Rights Reserved. Schneider Electric | Life Is On and EcoStruxure are trademarks and the property of Schneider Electric SE, its subsidiaries, and affiliated companies. 998_20464516_GMA-US 998_20464516_GMA-US.indd 1 1/23/19 4:40 PM A Special Supplement to DCD February 2019 Modernized by Contents Giving your facilities a new lease of life Features 4-5 The hidden data ome people want low-investment fixes like airflow shiny new things. improvements). And some center sector Others make a point buildings are such prime locations 6-7 From AOL to Stack of sweating their that there's no choice but to refit. Infrastructure assets and keeping equipment in use Stack Infrastructure is presiding 8-9 Advertorial: Suntil it has more than paid for itself. over a rebuild of a facility once modernize or Neither group is right. owned by AOL in the early days of outsource? When a facility is no longer the commercial Internet (p6), and capable of maintaining its peak a couple of New York skyscrapers 10-11 Data center performance, a full replacement house data centers that have been surgery can be hard to justify, but there will upgraded multiple times.
    [Show full text]
  • Ig¾a Corporate Plan
    In the beginning … water covered the Earth. Out of the water emerged an island, a single giant mass of land; an ancient supercontinent called Pangaea. Over billions of years, tectonic forces broke Pangaea apart, dividing the supercontinent into ever distant land masses: Africa, Eurasia, Australasia, North and South America. As the land masses drifted farther apart, so too did the people who inhabited them. Huge bodies of water, time and space, separated people from their friends, family, loved ones and partners in trade. Until now… Igæa: (eye-jee-uh) n: “i” mod. (interconnected; internet; idea); “Gaea” Grk. (earth; land). 1) The new supercontinent; a virtual place created through light speed communications; 2) Interconnected Earth; everywhere at once, omnipresent; 3) A global Internet Protocol (IP) communications network carrying streaming digital voice, video and data, transcending physical barriers, to bring all the people of the world togeth- er in one virtual place at any time. Important Information Confidential This corporate plan and all of its contents were produced internally by Igæa. For more information contact: Kirk Rittenhouse Manz, CEO Igæa 119 Windsor Drive Nashville, Tennessee 37205 E-mail [email protected] Telephone 615/353-9737 Facsimile 615/353-9521 www.igaea.com 2nd Quarter 2000 This business plan is provided for purposes of information and evaluation only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of securities, offers to buy or any other interest in the business. Any such offering will be made only by appropriate documents and in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws. The information contained in this document is absolutely confidential and is intend- ed only for persons to whom it is transmitted by the Company and to their imme- diate business associates with whom they are required to confer in order to prop- erly evaluate this business opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 21 1St Revised Page 4-1 Cancels Original Page 4-1
    THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 21 1st Revised Page 4-1 Cancels Original Page 4-1 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION (D)(x) (S)(y) 4. Verizon New York Inc. Special Construction Cases 4.1 Charges for the State of Connecticut (Company Code 5131) 4.1.1 Special Construction Cases Prior to May 25, 1984 The following cases are subject to the regulations specified in 2.1 through 2.8 preceding, with the following exception. When the initial liability period expires, an annual underutilization charge applies to the difference between 70% of the number of original specially constructed facilities and the number of facilities in service at filed tariff rates at that time. For purposes of determining the underutilization charge, any facilities subject to minimum period monthly charges are considered to be in service at filed tariff rates. There are no special construction cases prior to May 24, 1984 for the State of Connecticut. (S)(y) (D)(x) (x) Filed under authority of Special Permission No. 02-053 of the Federal Communications Commission. (y) Reissued material filed under TR 169, to become effective on April 13, 2002. (TR 176) Issued: April 11, 2002 Effective: April 13, 2002 Vice President, Federal Regulatory 1300 I Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005 THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 21 8th Revised Page 4-2 Cancels 7th Revised Page 4-2 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 4. Verizon New York Inc. Special Construction Cases (Cont'd) 4.1 Charges for the State of Connecticut (Company Code 5131) (Cont'd) 4.1.2 Charges to Provide Permanent Facilities Customer: Greenwich Capital Markets ID# 2003-264110 Description: Special Construction of facilities to provide fiber based telecommunications services at 600 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, CT 06830.
    [Show full text]
  • NL August 1987
    VOL. 12, NUMBER 5 7*t Nmlcttir o//A« P*rk West V7//<f« Ttnmnu Assoctetto* AUGUST 1987 MORE PWV MANAGEMENT CHANGES MANAGEMENT INVITES PWVTA TO MEET There has now been a complete changing of the After numerous requests from PWVTA to meet guard in the senior management of PWV. with Park West Management over the years, Starting at the very top, Leona Helmsley's which were always turned down (indeed, our office is taking an increasing operational existence as a tenants' association was never responsibility reviewing, for example, roof officially recognized in any way), we were repair bids at 400. Previously reported was invited by the new Park West Manager, the summary dismissal of Myron Marmorstein Alex Butkevich, to meet with him and his (October 1986) after more than 20 years at colleagues. We met with them on July 23 and PWV. Michael MacGovern, an 18-year PWV were assured that they were serious in want- veteran, was similarly dismissed from his ing to discuss tenant matters with us. This post as Operations Manager in June. was subsequently put in writing by Richard Weiss and Gerald Harris, formerly Benjamin E. Lipschitz, Vice President of directing PWV from Helmsley Spear's downtown Park West Management Corp. headquarters, and Carol Mann, a vice presi- dent of the Park West Management Corp., and We were told of the changes which will be the signer of the purchase agreements for made in 372/382 (detailed elsewhere in this Helmsley's Supervisory Management Company, newsletter), including having TV cameras in are no longer with the Helmsley corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • Skyscrapers and District Heating, an Inter-Related History 1876-1933
    Skyscrapers and District Heating, an inter-related History 1876-1933. Introduction: The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between a new urban and architectural form, the skyscraper, and an equally new urban infrastructure, district heating, both of witch were born in the north-east United States during the late nineteenth century and then developed in tandem through the 1920s and 1930s. These developments will then be compared with those in Europe, where the context was comparatively conservative as regards such innovations, which virtually never occurred together there. I will argue that, the finest example in Europe of skyscrapers and district heating planned together, at Villeurbanne near Lyons, is shown to be the direct consequence of American influence. Whilst central heating had appeared in the United Kingdom in the late eighteenth and the early nineteenth centuries, district heating, which developed the same concept at an urban scale, was realized in Lockport (on the Erie Canal, in New York State) in the 1880s. In United States were born the two important scientists in the fields of heating and energy, Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) and Benjamin Thompson Rumford (1753-1814). Standard radiators and boilers - heating surfaces which could be connected to central or district heating - were also first patented in the United States in the late 1850s.1 A district heating system produces energy in a boiler plant - steam or high-pressure hot water - with pumps delivering the heated fluid to distant buildings, sometimes a few kilometers away. Heat is therefore used just as in other urban networks, such as those for gas and electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Life After Lockup: Improving Reentry from Jail to the Community Kathy Gnall, Pennsylvania Department of Correction Miriam J
    Amy L. Solomon Jenny W.L. Osborne Stefan F. LoBuglio Jeff Mellow Debbie A. Mukamal Title of Section i 00-monograph-frontmatter.indd 1 4/29/08 11:10:25 AM 2100 M Street NW Washington, DC 20037 www.urban.org © 2008 Urban Institute On the Cover: Center photograph reprinted with permission from the Center for Employment Opportunities. This report was prepared under grant 2005-RE-CX-K148 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Offi ce of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice, the Urban Institute, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, or the Montgomery County, Maryland Department of Correction and Rehabilitation. About the Authors my L. Solomon is a senior research associate at the Urban Institute, where she works to link the research activities of the Justice Policy Center to the policy and A practice arenas. Amy directs projects relating to reentry from local jails, community supervision, and innovative reentry practices at the neighborhood level. Jenny W.L. Osborne is a research associate in the Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center, where she is involved in policy and practitioner-oriented prisoner reentry projects and serves as the center’s primary contact for prisoner reentry research. Jenny is the project coordinator for the Jail Reentry Roundtable Initiative and the Transition from Jail to Community project.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Department of Buildings Architectural Drawings and Plans for Lower Manhattan, Circa 1866-1978 Collection No
    NEW YORK CITY MUNICIPAL ARCHIVES 31 CHAMBERS ST., NEW YORK, NY 10007 Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Collection No. REC 0074 Processing, description, and rehousing by the Rolled Building Plans Project Team (2018-ongoing): Amy Stecher, Porscha Williams Fuller, David Mathurin, Clare Manias, Cynthia Brenwall. Finding aid written by Amy Stecher in May 2020. NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 1 NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Summary Record Group: RG 025: Department of Buildings Title of the Collection: Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan Creator(s): Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Bureau of Buildings; Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Housing and Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department for the Survey and Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Fire Department. Bureau of Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department Date: circa 1866-1978 Abstract: The Department of Buildings requires the filing of applications and supporting material for permits to construct or alter buildings in New York City. This collection contains the plans and drawings filed with the Department of Buildings between 1866-1978, for the buildings on all 958 blocks of Lower Manhattan, from the Battery to 34th Street, as well as a small quantity of material for blocks outside that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 a MESSAGE from the CHAIR and the PRESIDENT
    Annual Report 2012 A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR AND THE PRESIDENT In 2009, the Hudson Square Connection was estab- This Fiscal Year, our Board also approved an lished as the 64th Business Improvement District ambitious five year $27 million Streetscape (BID) in New York City. Since its inception, the Improvement Plan, which is poised to further the organization has worked hard to foster a strong transformation of Hudson Square. Prepared with sense of community in Hudson Square. Our objec- a team led by Matthews Nielsen Landscape Archi- tive has always been to create a special place in New tects, the Plan provides a blueprint for beautifying York where people want to work, play and live their and enlivening the streets, and reinforcing a lives. Fiscal Year 2012 was a break out year for us as socially, culturally and environmentally connected an organization. It was the year we began to see real community. The Plan is constructed as a public- progress against our ambitious goals. private partnership between the BID and the City During Fiscal Year 2012, we made great strides of New York. Our thanks to all of you who spent so in achieving our mission to reclaim our streets and much time sharing your thoughts and your dreams sidewalks for people. Numerous improvements for this wonderful neighborhood. We hope you’ll have lead to an enhanced environment that balances agree that the Plan captures the unique and vibrant pedestrians, cyclists and motorists. The Hudson identity of Hudson Square. Let’s work together to Square Connection’s Pedestrian Traffic Managers make it happen! are now a part of our community, easing the way During our first years as a BID, we talked a for all of us as we make our way to the subways great deal, as a community, about the future of each evening.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Wall Street Building (Originally Irving Trust Company Building, Now The
    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 6, 2001, Designation List 325 LP-2029 1 WALL STREET BUILDING (originally Irving Trust Company Building, now The Bank of New York Building), 1 Wall Street (aka 1-7 Wall Street, 70-80 Broadway, and 1-11 New Street), Manhattan. Built 1929-31; architect Ralph Walker of Voorhees, Gmelin & Walker. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 23, Lot 7 in part, consisting of the land bounded by the dimensions of the original(1929-31) building lot, starting at the northwest comer running easterly for approximately 102 feet, 5 inches along Wall Street, southerly for approximately 179 feet, 11 inches along New Street, westerly through the lot approximately 107 feet to Broadway, and northerly for approximately 178 feet, 6 inches along Broadway. On December 15, 1998, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 1 Wall Street Building and the proposed designation of its related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. The five speakers in favor of designation included Thaddeus S. Logan III, a vice president of The Bank of New York, representatives of the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Municipal Art Society, and the Historic Districts Council, as well as architectural historian Andrew Dolkart. There were no speakers in opposition. The Commission has received one letter in support of designation. Summary Constructed in 1929-31 as the corporate headquarters of the Irving Trust Company, this 50-story, limestone­ faced skyscraper is situated on what was considered the "most expensive real estate in New York," the intersection of Wall Street and Broadway.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN UNION BUILDING 60 Hudson Street, Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 1, 1991; Designation List 239 LP-1749 WESTERN UNION BUILDING 60 Hudson Street, Manhattan. Built 1928-30. Ralph Walker of Voorhees, Gmelin & Walker, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 144, Lot 40. On September 19, 1989, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Western Union Building, 60 Hudson Street, Manhattan, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 35). The building owner's representative requested that the hearing be continued. Five witnesses testified in favor of designation. The hearing was continued to December 12, 1989 (Item No. 13). At that hearing, the owner's representative requested another continuance, and the hearing was continued to April 3, 1990 (Item No. 13). At the third hearing, after discussing the special nature of the use of the building by communications firms, the owner's representative again requested that the hearing be continued. One witness testified in favor of designation. The hearing was closed and the record was left open for sixty days. The hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. 1 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Summary The Western Union Building (1928-30), designed by Ralph Walker, one of New York's foremost architects of the period, is a recognized achievement in modernistic skyscraper design. The building is characteristic of a group of communications buildings designed by Walker in the late 1920s, primarily for the telephone companies, in which he developed a distinctive design approach related to the contemporary Art Deco style.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Deals in Marriott Legal Battle
    20090914-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CN_-- 9/11/2009 8:09 PM Page 1 INSIDE REPORT TOP STORIES SMALL BUSINESS How Lehman crash Lessons in longevity changed New York from family firms three generations as we know it ® PAGE 2 and older P. 16 Hey, Jude! Broadway VOL. XXV, NO. 37 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM SEPTEMBER 14-20, 2009 PRICE: $3.00 peddles stars. Will it work? Secret deals PAGE 2 WYNN OR LOSE in Marriott Developer’s bank gets thumbs-down as his woes mount Vegas superstar faces uphill race at legal battle PAGE 3 Aqueduct; high rollers in Queens? ning—and they say the re- Bad signals coming Hotel owner’s cession is only partly to Only this time he’s planning a tran- suit claims blame. Last week, they filed out of Channel 13 BY AMANDA FUNG quil two-acre pond in the foreground a lawsuit against Courtyard PAGE 3 of what he hopes will be his latest management Management Corp., a sub- in 1999, Steve Wynn, the man who gambling destination, a sprawling rooms with union sidiary of Marriott Interna- NY pols are making helped transform Las Vegas into a quasi-classical building that will rise tional, accusing the hotel glamorous gambling mecca, built an beside the Aqueduct Raceway. operator of “negligent man- us Shakedown City eight-acre fountain that performs a Mr. Wynn is shifting his approach BY LISA FICKENSCHER agement.” The owners also ALAIR TOWNSEND, PAGE 11 watery dance set to music every in the face of one of his claim Courtyard charges ex- half-hour in front of his toughest challenges the courtyard marriott cessive fees for insurance newest casino there.
    [Show full text]