DOCSLIB.ORG

Bishops Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bishops Guidelines Bishop’s Guidelines 2017∗ Diocesan Office Bishopscourt St Nicholas Church 24 St Margaret's Street Boley Hill Rochester Rochester ME1 1TS ME1 1SL Tel: 01634 560000 Tel: 01634 842721 Email: Diocesan Office Email: Bishopscourt ∗ Updated Jan 2020 Rochester Diocese Bishop’s Guidelines 2017 Foreword, by Bishop James “The Church of England is part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church worshipping the one true God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It professes the faith uniquely revealed in the Holy Scriptures and set forth in the catholic creeds, which faith the Church is called upon to proclaim afresh in each generation. Led by the Holy Spirit, it has borne witness to Christian truth in its historic formularies, the Thirty-nine Articles of Religion, The Book of Common Prayer and the Ordering of Bishops, Priests and Deacons. In the declaration you are about to make will you affirm your loyalty to this inheritance of faith as your inspiration and guidance under God in bringing the grace and truth of Christ to this generation and making him known to those in your care?” Preface to the Declaration of Assent (Canon C15) These words introduce the Declaration of Assent which is made by those being commissioned for ordained and lay ministries in our church. They indicate the particular place which the Church of England inhabits in the life of this country. Our heritage is that of the Gospel handed down through the generations, but also the heritage of our ministry and our buildings, together with a substantial role in the nation’s public life. Our ministry has a significant impact on the stories people tell each other of what it means to be a Christian in this country. Within our heritage, there are elements which we share with Christians of other denominations and traditions, and there are those which are uniquely Anglican. Whatever our various traditions, we are bound together in fellowship - sacramental and synodical - and by geography. Each one of us who holds office, licence or authority within the Church of England has chosen to be part of this Communion, and with that choice have placed ourselves within the customs and laws of the Church of England and the responsibilities of being part of a national church. Our baptismal vows make us part of the Church Catholic; our further promises, commitments or oaths indicate our decision to be part of the Anglican Christian tradition as expressed in our country and within the wider Anglican Communion. For some of us what has drawn us is that very tradition, stretching back through our bishops and congregations to Augustine, and through Augustine back to the Apostles and our Lord’s Commission. For some of us it is the opportunity for mission found in an Established Church, a church which weaves herself through the life of individuals and institutions in this country in weddings, chaplaincies, country fairs and city centre churches. For some it is being part of the world- wide fellowship of the Anglican Communion. And some are drawn to the Church of England’s wealth of buildings – beautiful churches built to the glory of God – some to the heritage of poetry and music and liturgy that we share – the voice of prayer that carries the character of this church. In this Church the character of being a member of something greater than the sum of its parts is expressed in our structures and hierarchies, our shared liturgies and common stories, in our networks of parishes within deaneries within archdeaconries within the Rochester Diocese, part of the province of Canterbury in the Church of England in the Anglican Worldwide Communion among the Worldwide Fellowship of Churches. It is not unreasonable, then - and may even be helpful - for the Bishop of the Rochester Diocese to try to draw together some of the threads of this identity and of the ii Rochester Diocese Bishop’s Guidelines 2017 processes of this structure into something that reflects what it is to be responsible for the work and mission of the Church in this place among these people. So these guidelines are not intended to be a rulebook, nor to be a complete encyclopaedia to the Diocese of Rochester and the Church of England. They are to be part of our shared understanding and local practice of what it means to be an Anglican in this place. I hope they form a useful handbook, providing answers to the most commonly asked questions. Many of these matters are deeply pragmatic: matters of money and housing and pensions and discipline; some of them touch on doctrine and the ancient practices of the church; some of this document rests on the responsibility each owes to the other, on our shared spirituality and on the care of the Bishop for his people. Wherever possible the reader is signposted to the guiding principles on which the Diocesan forms are based, and to sources of further advice and guidance. Within these pages are also listed the various resources available to you in this Diocese and in the wider Church. I have sought to make it a document of best practice and encouragement, rather than a series of “thou shalts” and “thou shalt nots”. However, in a document like this, there are inevitably some subjects on which clear instruction is both necessary and, I hope, desirable. In short, it is my intention that these guidelines will help the clergy and officers of this Diocese to affirm your loyalty to [our] inheritance of faith as your inspiration and guidance under God in bringing the grace and truth of Christ to this generation and making him known to those in your care. With my prayers and good wishes, iii Called Together – Diocese of Rochester Framework Contents Foreword, by Bishop Ja mes ................................................................................................................................ ii Called Together – Diocese of Rochester Framework ............................................................................................. v A RESOURCES AND SUPPORT............................................................................................................................... 1 A1 Common Tenure ........................................................................................................................................... 3 A1.1 Freehold ......................................................................................................................................... 3 A1.2 Common Tenure ............................................................................................................................. 3 A1.3 Qualified Common Tenure ............................................................................................................... 3 A1.4 Clergy who do not qualify for Common Tenure ................................................................................. 4 A2 Statement of Particulars ................................................................................................................................ 5 A3 Role Descriptions .......................................................................................................................................... 6 A4 Stipend ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 A4.1 How payable................................................................................................................................... 7 A4.2 Training curates .............................................................................................................................. 7 A4.3 Incumbents .................................................................................................................................... 7 A4.4 Tax district ..................................................................................................................................... 7 A4.5 Local income................................................................................................................................... 7 A4.6 Expenses ........................................................................................................................................ 7 A4.7 Council tax, water rates and utility costs........................................................................................... 7 A4.8 Self Assessment .............................................................................................................................. 8 A5 Augmentation of Stipends ............................................................................................................................. 9 A6 Gra nts ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 A6.1 First appointment grants ............................................................................................................... 10 A6.2 Removal costs and expenses ......................................................................................................... 10 A6.3 Resettlement grants ...................................................................................................................... 10 A6.4 Continuing Ministerial Development grant ....................................................................................... 10 A6.5 Car loan schemes.......................................................................................................................... 10 Rochester Diocese Bishop’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helping Phyllis Stay Close to Her Family Page 4
    . R A B I newsWINTER 2017 THE MAGAZINE OF THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION Supporting farming families www.rabi.org.uk Cover photo: Twinkle, twinkle, little stars! Helping Phyllis stay close to her family Page 4 From the chairman I make no apology for taking up much of this column with Froman appeal for help.the R.A.B.I, chairman as a charity, wants to identify and assist more potential beneficiaries. In 2017, up to November 10, we have paid out around £1.5 million to some 1,200 families and individuals. We have also assisted, advised and signposted a further 330+ families, while our welfare staff have helped The life of people in financial need secure £294k in state benefits and allowances. This is money people were entitled to, but might not otherwise have got without our a former intervention. We all know there are other families and individuals land girl out there who could benefit from the assistance of R.A.B.I, but the age-old question is how do we reach Page 8 such individuals and persuade them to contact us? It’s often not as easy as you think. Whenever we receive a request or referral for help we handle the information discreetly. It’s important that the entire process of asking for help is confidential and this is a central feature of all the work that R.A.B.I undertakes. Don’t If you think that you – or another individual / family – could benefit from our assistance, please call our look Freephone Helpline number 0808 281 9490.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tombs of the Kings and Archbishops in St Austin's Abbey
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( THE TOMBS OF THE KINGS AND ARCH-, BISHOPS IN ST. AUSTIN'S ABBEY. (Based on a Lecture given by request of the Dean in the Cathedral Chapter House, Canterbury, on Thursday, July 9th, 1925.) BY THE REV. R. U. POTTS, M.A.., F.S.A., BURSAR OF ST. AtIGUSTINE'S COLLEGE. THE following is an attempt to give a brief collective account of the tombs of the Kings and Archbishops in St. Augustine's Abbey, both of those of which some remains have been found; and of those of which a record is preserved in writing. How the bodies of the Kings and Archbishops came to be buried in St. Augustine's is explained in Bede's descrip- tion. of the founding of the Abbey.* After mentioning the' founding of the Cathedral within the city, he goes on "He(i.e.,Augustine) alsobuiltamonasterynotfarfrom the' city to the eastward, in which by his advice Ethelbert erected from the foundation the church of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul; and enriched it with several donations: wherein the bodies of the same Augustine and of all the bishops of Canterbury and of the Kings of Icent might be buried." The foundation of the monastery, according to the Augustinian Ohronicle, was begun in 598, though the church was. not completed at the death of St; Augustine in 605. It was consecrated, according to Bede, by Augustine's successor, Laurence. Its distinct function as the home of the monks and the royal and episcopal burial-place is described at some length by Gotselin,t the monk who lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchman E D I T O R I a L
    Churchman E DITORIAL Sheep without a Shepherd? One of the side-effects of the decision to consecrate women as bishops in the Church of England has been the official recognition of the need to appoint an Evangelical bishop with a brief to minister to those who cannot accept female episcopal oversight. That some concessions would have to be made to the conservatives in the Church has been clear all along, and in that sense, the news that such an appointment will be made is not particularly surprising. The battles of the past few years over women bishops have been quite vicious at times, and honest observers have had to admit that the blame for this rests on the shoulders of the victors, who cannot (or will not) understand their opponents’ point of view. Worse still, the victors have done their best to silence objectors altogether, even if the people concerned are in principle on their side. It is impossible to forget the attempt that was made to impeach Philip Giddings, the chairman of the House of Laity in General Synod, merely because he voted against the immediate introduction of women bishops. Dr Giddings supports the consecration of women but he thought that the provisions being offered to those who disagree with that were not generous enough, and when he was attacked for his principled stand it was clear to most people that things had gone too far. Even the archbishop of Canterbury was moved to comment that how we treat one another when differences divide us actually matters—the notion of ‘good disagreement,’ which he is now so keen to promote, can almost certainly be traced back to this unhappy episode.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cathedral Priory of St. Andrew, Rochester
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE CATHEDRAL PRIORY OF ST. ANDREW, ROCHESTER By ANNE M. OAKLEY, M.A. THE church of St. Andrew the Apostle, Rochester, was founded by Ethelbert, King of Kent, as a college for a small number of secular canons under Justus, Bishop of Rochester, in A.D. 604. Very httle is known about the history of this house. It never seems to have had much influence outside its own walls, and though it possessed considerable landed estates, seems to have been relatively small and poor. It also suffered at the hands of the Danes. Bishops Justus, Romanus, Pauhnus and Ithamar were all remarkable men, but after Bishop Putta's transla- tion to Hereford in 676, very Httle is heard of Rochester. Their bishop, Siweard, is not mentioned as having been at Hastings with King Harold as were many of the Saxon bishops and abbots, and the house put up no opposition to William I when he seized their lands and gave them to his half brother Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, whom he had created Earl of Kent. The chroniclers say that the house was destitute, and that, when Siweard died in 1075, it was barely able to support the five canons on the estabHshment.1 Four years after his conquest of England, Wilham I invited his friend Lanfranc, Prior of Caen and a former monk of Bee in Normandy, to be bis archbishop at Canterbury. Lanfranc's task was specific: to reorganize EngHsh monasticism on the pattern of Bee; to develop a strict cloistered monasticism, but one of a kind that was not entirely cut off by physical barriers from the Hfe of the rest of the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonbridge Castle and Its Lords
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 16 1886 TONBRIDGE OASTLE AND ITS LORDS. BY J. F. WADMORE, A.R.I.B.A. ALTHOUGH we may gain much, useful information from Lambard, Hasted, Furley, and others, who have written on this subject, yet I venture to think that there are historical points and features in connection with this building, and the remarkable mound within it, which will be found fresh and interesting. I propose therefore to give an account of the mound and castle, as far as may be from pre-historic times, in connection with the Lords of the Castle and its successive owners. THE MOUND. Some years since, Dr. Fleming, who then resided at the castle, discovered on the mound a coin of Con- stantine, minted at Treves. Few will be disposed to dispute the inference, that the mound existed pre- viously to the coins resting upon it. We must not, however, hastily assume that the mound is of Roman origin, either as regards date or construction. The numerous earthworks and camps which are even now to be found scattered over the British islands are mainly of pre-historic date, although some mounds may be considered Saxon, and others Danish. Many are even now familiarly spoken of as Caesar's or Vespa- sian's camps, like those at East Hampstead (Berks), Folkestone, Amesbury, and Bensbury at Wimbledon. Yet these are in no case to be confounded with Roman TONBEIDGHE CASTLE AND ITS LORDS. 13 camps, which in the times of the Consulate were always square, although under the Emperors both square and oblong shapes were used.* These British camps or burys are of all shapes and sizes, taking their form and configuration from the hill-tops on which they were generally placed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Charge Delivered to the Clergy of the Diocese of Rochester : at His
    , UIUC . — A CHARCtE DELIVERED TO / ^ CPlp* / THE CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER, AT HIS PRIMARY VISITATION IN 1881. BY ANTHONY W. THOROLD, D.D., NINETY-EIGHTH BISHOP. " Receive ye one another, ns Christ also received us to Ihe glory of God."— St. Pai l. " I like the thouj^ht of acliii;,' on lueii, u>it w) much direclly, iw throut'h others.'' James Hinto.v. (WITH MAP.) LONDON: JOHN MUEEAY, ALIJEMAKLE STREET. 1881. 'Price Two Shillings. — " Whatever original energy may be supposed either in force or regulation, the operation of both is in truth merely instrumental. Nations are governed by the same methods, and on the same prin- ciples by vi'hich an individual without authority is often able to govern those vrho are his equals or superiors ; by a knowledge of their temper, and by a judicious management of it. The laws reach but a very little way." Burke. CONTENTS. riiAr. • l-AGB I. Four Years 5 II. Rochester Diocese in 1881 22 III. Wants 30 IV. Counsels and Directions 44 V. Church Problems . 64 VI. The Out-look 84 — " Wisdom, -when in power And wisest, should not frown as power, but smile As kindness, watching all till the true must Shall make her strike as power." Tennyson. CHAPTER I. FOUR YEARS. " Thought is the only true support of action. Reverence for the thoughts and souls of the men whom you meet is not uuly the way to redeem them, but the way to conquer them." My Reverend Brethren, 1. A Pastoral letter in 1878 perhaps sufficiently indi- cated the principles on which I desired to administer the diocese, and the organisation which seemed in the first instance requisite for its urgent needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Daylight Upon Magic': Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy
    ‘Daylight upon magic’: Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy Michael Ledger-Lomas If it help, through the senses, to bring home to the heart one more true idea of the glory and the tenderness of God, to stir up one deeper feeling of love, and thankfulness for an example so noble, to mould one life to more earnest walking after such a pattern of self-devotion, or to cast one gleam of brightness and hope over sorrow, by its witness to a continuous life in Christ, in and beyond the grave, their end will have been attained.1 Thus Canon Charles Leslie Courtenay (1816–1894) ended his account of the memorial window to the Prince Consort which the chapter of St George’s Chapel, Windsor had commissioned from George Gilbert Scott and Clayton and Bell. Erected in time for the wedding of Albert’s son the Prince of Wales in 1863, the window attempted to ‘combine the two ele- ments, the purely memorial and the purely religious […] giving to the strictly memorial part, a religious, whilst fully preserving in the strictly religious part, a memorial character’. For Courtenay, a former chaplain- in-ordinary to Queen Victoria, the window asserted the significance of the ‘domestic chapel of the Sovereign’s residence’ in the cult of the Prince Consort, even if Albert’s body had only briefly rested there before being moved to the private mausoleum Victoria was building at Frogmore. This window not only staked a claim but preached a sermon. It proclaimed the ‘Incarnation of the Son of God’, which is the ‘source of all human holiness, the security of the continuousness of life and love in Him, the assurance of the Communion of Saints’.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES ARMY WWI CHAPLAINS 1. Abbott, Alexander Howes 2. Abbott, Joseph V. 3. Abrams, William Edward 4. Acker, Lawr
    UNITED STATES ARMY WWI CHAPLAINS 52. Arrowood, William W. 53. Arthur, Elijah A. 54. Ashford, William Curtis 1. Abbott, Alexander Howes 55. Ashmore, Charles Morriston 2. Abbott, Joseph V. 56. Aston, Andrew Clement 3. Abrams, William Edward 57. Atherholt, Edgar Frank 4. Acker, Lawrence 58. Atkinson, Harry Grant 5. Ackerman, Willliam 59. Atkinson, John Clark 6. Ackermann, Maurice 60. Atkinson, William Alexander 7. Ackley, Charles B. 61. Atkinson, William Austin 8. Acree, Claude Ferdinand 62. Auger, Elias 9. Adams, Chauncey Allen 63. Aull, Roger 10. Adams, Jr. , Eleazar Tarrant 64. Austin, Clarence L. 11. Adams, James B. 65. Averitt, Erwin L. 12. Addison, James Thayer 66. Axton, John Victor 13. Ahern, Stephen Leo 67. Axton, John T. 14. Aiken, William A. 68. Babcock, Byrl F. 15. Akin, Russell Ernest 69. Babcock, Sidney Henry 16. Albers, Joseph Henry 70. Babst, Julius J. 17. Alderton, Walker Moore 71. Bachelor, Theodore 18. Alexander, Eugene 72. Bachman, Francis D. 19. Alexander, William Marvin 73. Bacon, Alvin C. 20. Alfriend, William J. 74. Baczyk, Andrew J. 21. Allan, John James 75. Baer, Brenton Lloyd C. 22. Allchin, Frederick James 76. Bagby, Arthur Guy 23. Allen, Garrett LeRoy 77. Bagget, John F. 24. Allen, Jacob D. 78. Bailey, George Monballiu 25. Allen, Louis Chowning 79. Baird, William Parcell 26. Allgood, Jackson Lee 80. Baker, Abe L. 27. Allison, George William 81. Baker, Abram L. 28. Alton, John T. 82. Baker, Arthur M. 29. Amiger, William T. 83. Baker, Charles J. 30. Andem, Ralph Taylor 84. Baker, Henry Vernon 31. Anderson, Edgar W. 85. Baker, Wesley Leroy 32.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Town of Keene [New Hampshire]
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 613 part of the township, and ultimately owned several hun­ dred acres there, covering the south end of Beech hill and extending on both sides of the branch, including a large part of the intervale southwest of his cabin. "One of the first things he did was to plant an or­ chard, and some years later, when the trees were partly grown and the Indians began to be troublesome, looking out from his cabin he saw one of the savages cutting down an apple tree. He took down his gun, and that Indian never cut any more trees." "He used to lie in his cabin, or under a brush heap, with his gun, and watch for lurk­ ing Indians while his wife milked the cows." (Heaton tra­ dition.) His log cabin was burned by the Indians when the township was abandoned, in 1747, but he was one of the first to return, and he built the low farmhouse, still stand­ ing on the east side of the street, opposite the site of his log cabin-the second from the old Mount Pleasant tavern -and lived and died there. He was at one time a lieuten­ ant in the militia. It is a tradition in the family that that was the first framed house built in the township-doubt­ less now the oldest house in town-and it is still in pos­ session of his descendants ; but the large old chimney has been removed and two smaller ones substituted. His sons and other descendants afterwards built houses and lived along the same road, towards the branch; and some of the old barns still standing there were built by the elder Heaton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magdalen Hospital : the Story of a Great Charity
    zs c: CCS = CD in- CD THE '//////i////t//t/i//n///////.'/ CO « m INCOKM<i%^2r mmammmm ^X^^^Km . T4 ROBERT DINGLEY, F. R. S. KINDLY LENT BY DINGLEY AFTER THE FROM AN ENGRAVING ( JOHN ESQ.) IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE HOSPITAL PAINTING BY W. HOARE ( I760) Frontispiece THE MAGDALEN HOSPITAL THE STORY OF A GREAT CHARITY BY THE REV. H. F. B. COMPSTON, M.A., ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OP HEBREW AT KING'S COLLEGE, LONDON PROFESSOR OF DIVINITY AT QUEEN'S COLLEGE, LONDON WITH FOREWORD BY THE MOST REVEREND THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY PRESIDENT OF THE MAGDALEN HOSPITAL WITH TWENTY ILLUSTRATIONS SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE LONDON: 68, HAYMARKET, S.W. 1917 AD MAIOREM DEI GLORIAM M\ FOREWORD It is a great satisfaction to me to be allowed to introduce with a word of commendation Mr. Compston's admirable history of the Magdalen Hospital. The interest with which I have read his pages will I am sure be shared by all who have at heart the well-being of an Institution which occupies a unique place in English history, although happily there is not anything unique nowadays in the endeavour which the Magdalen Hospital makes in face of a gigantic evil. The story Mr. Compston tells gives abundant evidence of the change for the better in public opinion regarding this crying wrong and its remedy. It shows too the growth of a sounder judg- ment as to the methods of dealing with it. For every reason it is right that this book should have been written, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ALPHABETICAL INDEX of CHARITIES Registered in the Isle of Man Under the Charities Registration and Regulation Act 2019 No
    ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF CHARITIES Registered in the Isle of Man under the Charities Registration and Regulation Act 2019 No. Charity Objects Correspondence address Email address Website Date Registered To advance the protection of the environment by encouraging innovation as to methods of safe disposal of plastics and as to 29-31 Athol Street, Douglas, Isle 1269 A LIFE LESS PLASTIC reduction in their use; by raising public awareness of the [email protected] www.alifelessplastic.org 08 Jan 2019 of Man, IM1 1LB environmental impact of plastics; and by doing anything ancillary to or similar to the above. To raise money to provide financial assistance for parents/guardians resident on the Isle of Man whose finances determine they are unable to pay costs themselves. The financial assistance given will be to provide full/part payment towards travel and accommodation costs to and from UK hospitals, purchase of items to help with physical/mental wellbeing and care in the home, Belmont, Maine Road, Port Erin, 1114 A LITTLE PIECE OF HOPE headstones, plaques and funeral costs for children and gestational [email protected] 29 Oct 2012 Isle of Man, IM9 6LQ aged to 16 years. For young adults aged 16-21 years who are supported by their parents with no necessary health/life insurance in place, financial assistance will also be looked at under the same rules. To provide a free service to parents/guardians resident on the Isle of Man helping with funeral arrangements of deceased children To help physically or mentally handicapped children or young Department of Education, 560 A W CLAGUE DECD persons whose needs are made known to the Isle of Man Hamilton House, Peel Road, 1992 Department of Education Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 5EZ Particularly for the purpose of abandoned and orphaned children of Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Dean
    Grace Episcopal Cathedral June 2018 Topeka, Kansas Vol. 92, No. 6 From the Dean. An Easter Epiphany Dear Friends, By the time you read this last Chimes message from me, I will have done my last service at Grace and will, in fact, be on vacation before starting a new part- time job as interim pastor at St. Paul’s in Leavenworth while they are searching for a new rector. I’ll be working four days a week, including Sundays and have a letter of agreement for 12 months. This will give me time to think through some things and make important decisions Farewell, about where I want to be and what I want to do for the next several years Dean Lipscomb of my life. So, there’s that. And then, there’s this. It has been almost a year since Robyn’s death, and several months of sickness before that. In fact, it was Good Friday, 2017 that we were given the diagnosis of Stage 4 lung and bone cancer and told nothing could be done. I know, as I leave this community that walked through that time with me, many of you are concerned about how I am going to get along. So, I want to tell you a story that I’ve shared with several small groups, about what happened to me on Easter Sunday. As I said, Good Friday last year, Robyn was diagnosed with terminal continued on page 2 From the Dean Steve Lipscomb named “Dean Emeritus” cancer, after being treated the prior two months for what we (and the Dean Steve Lipscomb was honored on Pentecost with the title of Dean doctors) thought was a persistent Emeritus at Grace Cathedral.
    [Show full text]