DOCSLIB.ORG

Senior Review 2010 of MO&DA Program Public V3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Senior Review 2010 of MO&DA Program Public V3 Senior Review 2010 of the Mission Operations and Data Analysis Program For the Heliophysics Operating Missions July 5th, 2010 Submitted to: Richard R. Fisher, Director Heliophysics Division Science Mission Directorate Submitted by: Charles Swenson (Chair), Douglas Biesecker, J. Bernard Blake, Michael Henderson, Robert Hoffman, Judy Karpen, Ian Mann, Scott McIntosh, Allan J. Tylka, and Daniel Winterhalter Contents 1 Overview................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Missions Considered ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Instructions to Senior Review Panel............................................................................................... 8 1.4 Methodology of the Senior Review Panel....................................................................................... 8 2 Senior Review Panel Findings............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Overview of Findings ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Implications for Heliophysics System Science ............................................................................... 9 2.3 Mission Grades............................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Major Findings .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.1 Budget Reduction Findings ................................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 Other Findings ....................................................................................................................... 13 3 Evaluations of Missions ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 ACE .............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 14 3.1.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 15 3.1.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCE TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 15 3.1.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW:................................................................................ 16 3.1.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 16 3.1.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 16 3.1.7 E/PO EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ............................................................................ 17 3.1.9 OVERALL RATING ............................................................................................................... 17 3.2 AIM ............................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 18 3.2.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 18 3.2.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCY TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 19 3.2.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW:................................................................................ 19 3.2.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 19 3.2.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 19 3.2.7 E/PO EVALUTION................................................................................................................. 19 3.2.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ............................................................................ 19 3.2.9 OVERALL RATING ............................................................................................................... 20 3.3 ARTEMIS...................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 21 3.3.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 21 3.3.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCY TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 22 3.3.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW:................................................................................ 22 3.3.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 23 3.3.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 23 3.3.7 E/PO EVALUTION................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ............................................................................ 23 3.3.9 OVERALL RATING ............................................................................................................... 24 3.4 CINDI............................................................................................................................................ 25 3.4.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 25 3.4.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 25 3.4.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCE TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 26 3.4.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW................................................................................. 26 3.4.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 26 3.4.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 26 3.4.7 E/PO EVALUTION................................................................................................................. 27 3.4.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ............................................................................ 27 3.4.9 OVERALL RATING ............................................................................................................... 27 3.5 CLUSTER..................................................................................................................................... 29 3.5.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 29 3.5.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 30 3.5.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCY TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 31 3.5.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW................................................................................. 31 3.5.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 31 3.5.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 32 3.5.7 E/PO EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 33 3.5.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ............................................................................ 33 3.5.9 OVERALL RATING ............................................................................................................... 33 3.5.10 PROGRAMMATIC FACTORS............................................................................................. 34 3.1 HINODE........................................................................................................................................ 35 3.1.1 EXTENDED MISSION SUMMARY........................................................................................ 35 3.1.2 EXTENDED MISSION SCIENCE EVALUATION .................................................................. 35 3.1.3 EXTENDED MISSION RELEVANCE TO THE “Heliophysics System Observatory” and “Road Map” 36 3.1.4 EXTENDED MISSION COST REVIEW................................................................................. 37 3.1.5 SPACECRAFT / INSTRUMENT HEALTH AND STATUS..................................................... 37 3.1.6 DATA OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 38 3.1.7 E/PO EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 38 3.1.8 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Abulfeda crater chain (Moon), 97 Aphrodite Terra (Venus), 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 Acheron Fossae (Mars), 165 Apohele asteroids, 353–354 Achilles asteroids, 351 Apollinaris Patera (Mars), 168 achondrite meteorites, 360 Apollo asteroids, 346, 353, 354, 361, 371 Acidalia Planitia (Mars), 164 Apollo program, 86, 96, 97, 101, 102, 108–109, 110, 361 Adams, John Couch, 298 Apollo 8, 96 Adonis, 371 Apollo 11, 94, 110 Adrastea, 238, 241 Apollo 12, 96, 110 Aegaeon, 263 Apollo 14, 93, 110 Africa, 63, 73, 143 Apollo 15, 100, 103, 104, 110 Akatsuki spacecraft (see Venus Climate Orbiter) Apollo 16, 59, 96, 102, 103, 110 Akna Montes (Venus), 142 Apollo 17, 95, 99, 100, 102, 103, 110 Alabama, 62 Apollodorus crater (Mercury), 127 Alba Patera (Mars), 167 Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), 110 Aldrin, Edwin (Buzz), 94 Apophis, 354, 355 Alexandria, 69 Appalachian mountains (Earth), 74, 270 Alfvén, Hannes, 35 Aqua, 56 Alfvén waves, 35–36, 43, 49 Arabia Terra (Mars), 177, 191, 200 Algeria, 358 arachnoids (see Venus) ALH 84001, 201, 204–205 Archimedes crater (Moon), 93, 106 Allan Hills, 109, 201 Arctic, 62, 67, 84, 186, 229 Allende meteorite, 359, 360 Arden Corona (Miranda), 291 Allen Telescope Array, 409 Arecibo Observatory, 114, 144, 341, 379, 380, 408, 409 Alpha Regio (Venus), 144, 148, 149 Ares Vallis (Mars), 179, 180, 199 Alphonsus crater (Moon), 99, 102 Argentina, 408 Alps (Moon), 93 Argyre Basin (Mars), 161, 162, 163, 166, 186 Amalthea, 236–237, 238, 239, 241 Ariadaeus Rille (Moon), 100, 102 Amazonis Planitia (Mars), 161 COPYRIGHTED
    [Show full text]
  • On the Solar Chromosphere Observed at the Limb with Hinode
    The Astrophysical Journal, 719:469–473, 2010 August 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/469 C 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. ON THE SOLAR CHROMOSPHERE OBSERVED AT THE LIMB WITH HINODE Philip G. Judge1 and Mats Carlsson2 1 High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA 2 Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, P.O. Box 1029, Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway Received 2010 March 8; accepted 2010 April 8; published 2010 July 21 ABSTRACT Broadband images in the Ca ii H line, from the Broadband Filter Imager (BFI) instrument on the Hinode spacecraft, show emission from spicules emerging from and visible right down to the observed limb. Surprisingly, little absorption of spicule light is seen along their lengths. We present formal solutions to the transfer equation for given (ad hoc) source functions, including a stratified chromosphere from which spicules emanate. The model parameters are broadly compatible with earlier studies of spicules. The visibility of Ca ii spicules down to the limb in Hinode data seems to require that spicule emission be Doppler shifted relative to the stratified atmosphere, either by supersonic turbulent or organized spicular motion. The non-spicule component of the chromosphere is almost invisible in the broadband BFI data, but we predict that it will be clearly visible in high spectral resolution data. Broadband Ca ii H limb images give the false impression that the chromosphere is dominated by spicules. Our analysis serves as a reminder that the absence of a signature can be as significant as its presence.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTER PLANET SPACECRAFT TEMPERATURE TESTING and ANALYSIS by Alan R
    OUTER PLANET SPACECRAFT TEMPERATURE TESTING AND ANALYSIS by Alan R. Hoffman and Arturo Avila Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Califomia Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA 91 109 USA Email: [email protected].,yov, Arturo.Avila @iuLnasa.nov Unmanned spacecraft flown on missions to the outer planets of the solar system have included flybys, planetary orbiters, and atmospheric probes during the last three decades. The thermal design, test, and analysis approach applied to these spacecraft evolved from the passive thermal designs applied to the earlier lunar and interplanetary spacecraft. The inflight temperature data from representative sets of engineering subsystems and science instruments from a subset of these spacecraft are compared to those obtained during the ground test programs and from the prelaunch predictions. The ground testing programs applied to all of these missions are characterized by: a) thermal development test activity for areas where there were significant thermal uncertainties, b) rigorous “black box level” environmental temperature testing program for the electronics and mechanisms which included a long dwell time at a hot temperature in vacuum, and c) comprehensive solar thermal vacuum test program on the flight spacecraft. Several lessons are presented with specific recommendations for considerations for new projects to aid in the planning of cost effective temperature design, test, and analysis programs. 1. INTRODUCTION The exploration of the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) using unmanned remote sensing spacecraft has occurred during the latter part of the 20th century and continues in the early part of the 21’‘ century. The scientific data obtained has included spectacular pictures of Jupiter and its bands and of Saturn and its rings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyager Program ______
    Astronomy Cast Episode 199 The Voyager Program ________________________________________________________________________ Fraser: Astronomy Cast Episode 199 for Monday September 20, 2010, The Voyager Program. Welcome to Astronomy Cast, our weekly facts-based journey through the cosmos, where we help you understand not only what we know, but how we know what we know. My name is Fraser Cain, I'm the publisher of Universe Today, and with me is Dr. Pamela Gay, a professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Hi, Pamela, how are you doing? Pamela: I’m doing well, how are you doing, Fraser? Fraser: Great. 199... that’s really close to 200! Pamela: Yes, yes it is. Fraser: I know a lot of people want us to do something special for 200, but I don’t know. We’ll have to think of something. Either that, or you can just, you know, explain how to do gravitational mathematics. Everyone get pen and paper out... Pamela: No, there are some things I like myself too much to do. Explaining tensor calculus falls into that category. Fraser: Over the radio... Pamela: Over the radio, yes... Fraser: Alright, so launched in 1977, the twin Voyager spacecraft were sent to explore the outer planets... Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Because of a unique alignment of the planets, Voyager II was the first spacecraft to ever make a close approach to Uranus and Neptune. Let’s take a look back at this amazing program and see where the spacecraft are today. And I wanted to add that “are today” because they’re still going! Pamela: I know..
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyager Design Studies
    e > c IbAGESI (CODE) I L 3/ ~ (CATEGORY) a VOYAGER DESIGN STUDIES Volume One: Summary Prepared Under Contract Number NASw 697 .Research and Advanced Development Division .Avco Corpo- ration m Wilmington, Massachusetts National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration m Avco/RAD m TR-63-34 .15 October 1963 _... FOREWORD The Voyager Design Study final report is divided into six volumes, for convenience in handling. A brief description of the contents of each volume is listed below. Volume I -- Summary A completely self-contained synopsis of the entire study. Volume I1 - - Scientific Mission Analvsis Mission analysis, evolution of the Voyager program, and science payload. Volume 111 -- Systems Analysis Mission and system tradeoff studies; trajectory analysis; orbit and landing site selection; reliability; sterilization Volume rV -- Orbiter-Bus System Design Engineering and design details of the orbiter-bus Volume V -- Lander System Design Engineering and design details of the lander. Volume VI -- Development Plan Proposed development plan, schedules, costs, problem areas. 2 .- This document consists of 126 pages, 116 copies, Series A L VOYAGER DESIGN STUDIES Volume I: Summary AVCQRAD-TR-63-34 ’ 15 October 1963 Prepared under Contract No. NASw 697 by FU3SEARCH AND ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT DIVISION AVCO CORPORATION Wilmington, Massachusetts for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ....................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 2 2 . MISSION
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Remembered
    July 2015 Vol. 2 No. 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S magazine FOREVER REMEMBERED Earth Solar Aeronautics Mars Technology Right ISS System & Research Now Beyond NASA’S National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCH KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S SCHEDULE SPACEPORT MAGAZINE Date: July 3, 12:55 a.m. EDT Mission: Progress 60P Cargo Craft CONTENTS Description: In early July, the Progress 60P resupply vehicle — 4 �������������������Solemn shuttle exhibit shares enduring lessons an automated, unpiloted version of the Soyuz spacecraft that is used to ����������������Flyby will provide best ever view of Pluto 10 bring supplies and fuel — launches 14 ����������������New Horizons spacecraft hones in on Pluto to the International Space Station. http://go.nasa.gov/1HUAYbO 24 ����������������Firing Room 4 used for RESOLVE mission simulation Date: July 22, 5:02 p.m. EDT 28 ����������������SpaceX, NASA will rebound from CRS-7 loss Mission: Expedition 44 Launch to 29 ����������������Backup docking adapter to replace lost IDA-1 the ISS Description: In late July, Kjell SHUN FUJIMURA 31 ����������������Thermal Protection System Facility keeping up Lindgren of NASA, Kimiya Yui of JAXA and Oleg Kononenko of am an education specialist in the Education Projects and 35 ����������������New crew access tower takes shape at Cape Roscosmos launch aboard a Soyuz I Youth Engagement Office. I work to inspire students to pursue science, technology, engineering, mathematics, or 36 ����������������Innovative thinking converts repair site into garden spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan to the STEM, careers and with teachers to better integrate STEM 38 ����������������Proposals in for new class of launch services space station.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-21-330, Nasa Lunar Programs
    Report to Congressional Committees May 2021 NASA LUNAR PROGRAMS Significant Work Remains, Underscoring Challenges to Achieving Moon Landing in 2024 GAO-21-330 May 2021 NASA LUNAR PROGRAMS Significant Work Remains, Underscoring Challenges to Achieving Moon Landing in 2024 Highlights of GAO-21-330, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In March 2019, the White House The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has initiated eight directed NASA to accelerate its plans lunar programs since 2017 to help NASA achieve its goal of returning humans to for a lunar landing by 4 years, to 2024. the Moon. NASA plans to conduct this mission, known as Artemis III, in 2024. Accomplishing this goal will require NASA has made progress by completing some early lunar program development extensive coordination across lunar activities including initial contract awards, but an ambitious schedule decreases programs and contractors to ensure the likelihood of NASA achieving its goal. For example, NASA’s planned pace to systems operate together seamlessly develop a Human Landing System, shown below, is months faster than other and safely. In December 2019, GAO spaceflight programs, and a lander is inherently more complex because it found that NASA had begun making supports human spaceflight. decisions related to requirements, cost, and schedule for individual lunar Notional Human Landing System programs but was behind in taking these steps for the Artemis III mission. The House Committee on Appropriations included a provision in 2018 for GAO to review NASA’s proposed lunar-focused programs. This is the second such report.
    [Show full text]
  • What Causes the High Apparent Speeds in Chromospheric and Transition Region Spicules on the Sun?
    The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 849:L7 (7pp), 2017 November 1 https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9272 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. What Causes the High Apparent Speeds in Chromospheric and Transition Region Spicules on the Sun? Bart De Pontieu1,2 , Juan Martínez-Sykora1,3 , and Georgios Chintzoglou1,4 1 Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; [email protected] 2 Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, NO-0315 Oslo, Norway 3 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Petaluma, CA 94952, USA 4 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-3000, USA Received 2017 June 22; revised 2017 October 5; accepted 2017 October 9; published 2017 October 23 Abstract Spicules are the most ubuiquitous type of jets in the solar atmosphere. The advent of high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy from the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) and ground-based observatories has revealed the presence of very high apparent motions of order 100–300 km s−1 in spicules, as measured in the plane of the sky. However, line of sight measurements of such high speeds have been difficult to obtain, with values deduced from Doppler shifts in spectral lines typically of order 30–70 km s−1. In this work, we resolve this long-standing discrepancy using recent 2.5D radiative MHD simulations. This simulation has revealed a novel driving mechanism for spicules in which ambipolar diffusion resulting from ion-neutral interactions plays a key role. In our simulation, we often see that the upward propagation of magnetic waves and electrical currents from the low chromosphere into already existing spicules can lead to rapid heating when the currents are rapidly dissipated by ambipolar diffusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun's Dynamic Atmosphere
    Lecture 16 The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Jiong Qiu, MSU Physics Department Guiding Questions 1. What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere cool off farther away from the Sun’s center? 2. What intrinsic properties of the Sun are reflected in the photospheric observations of limb darkening and granulation? 3. What are major observational signatures in the dynamic chromosphere? 4. What might cause the heating of the upper atmosphere? Can Sound waves heat the upper atmosphere of the Sun? 5. Where does the solar wind come from? 15.1 Introduction The Sun’s atmosphere is composed of three major layers, the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. The different layers have different temperatures, densities, and distinctive features, and are observed at different wavelengths. Structure of the Sun 15.2 Photosphere The photosphere is the thin (~500 km) bottom layer in the Sun’s atmosphere, where the atmosphere is optically thin, so that photons make their way out and travel unimpeded. Ex.1: the mean free path of photons in the photosphere and the radiative zone. The photosphere is seen in visible light continuum (so- called white light). Observable features on the photosphere include: • Limb darkening: from the disk center to the limb, the brightness fades. • Sun spots: dark areas of magnetic field concentration in low-mid latitudes. • Granulation: convection cells appearing as light patches divided by dark boundaries. Q: does the full moon exhibit limb darkening? Limb Darkening: limb darkening phenomenon indicates that temperature decreases with altitude in the photosphere. Modeling the limb darkening profile tells us the structure of the stellar atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List of Contents
    Complete List of Contents Volume 1 Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center ......213 Publisher’s Note ......................................................... vii Chandra X-Ray Observatory ....................................223 Introduction ................................................................. ix Clementine Mission to the Moon .............................229 Preface to the Third Edition ..................................... xiii Commercial Crewed vehicles ..................................235 Contributors ............................................................. xvii Compton Gamma Ray Observatory .........................240 List of Abbreviations ................................................. xxi Cooperation in Space: U.S. and Russian .................247 Complete List of Contents .................................... xxxiii Dawn Mission ..........................................................254 Deep Impact .............................................................259 Air Traffic Control Satellites ........................................1 Deep Space Network ................................................264 Amateur Radio Satellites .............................................6 Delta Launch Vehicles .............................................271 Ames Research Center ...............................................12 Dynamics Explorers .................................................279 Ansari X Prize ............................................................19 Early-Warning Satellites ..........................................284
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Digital.Pdf
    EXPLORE “sic itur ad astra” ~ thus you shall go to the stars EXPERTISE FOR THE MISSION We’ve built more interplanetary spacecraft than all other U.S. companies combined. We’re ready for humanity’s next step, for Earth, the Sun, our planets … and beyond. We do this for the New capability explorers. And for us for a new space era Achieving in space takes tenacity. Lockheed Martin brings more We’ve never missed a tight (and finite) capability to the table than ever planetary mission launch window. before, creating better data, new Yet, despite how far we go, the most images and groundbreaking ways to important technologies we develop work. And we’re doing it with smarter improve life now, closer to home. factories and common products, Here on Earth. making our systems increasingly affordable and faster to produce. HALF A CENTURY AT MARS Getting to space is hard. Each step past that is increasingly harder. We’ve been a part of every NASA mission to Mars, and we know what it takes to arrive on another planet and explore. Our proven work includes aeroshells, autonomous deep space operations or building orbiters and landers, like InSight. AEROSHELLS VIKING 1 VIKING 2 PATHFINDER MARS POLAR SPIRIT OPPORTUNITY PHOENIX CURIOSITY INSIGHT MARS 2020 1976 1976 1996 LANDER 2004 2018 2008 2012 2018 2020 1999 ORBITERS MARS OBSERVER MARS GLOBAL MARS CLIMATE MARS ODYSSEY MARS RECONNAISSANCE MAVEN 1993 SURVEYOR ORBITER 2001 ORBITER 2014 1997 1999 2006 LANDERS VIKING 1 VIKING 2 MARS POLAR PHOENIX INSIGHT 1976 1976 LANDER 2008 2018 1999 Taking humans back to the Moon – We bring solutions for our customers that include looking outside our organization to deliver the best science through our spacecraft and operations expertise.
    [Show full text]