DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2007.07780V4 [Physics.Class-Ph] 2 Jul 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2007.07780V4 [Physics.Class-Ph] 2 Jul 2021 SPECIAL RELATIVITY Applications to astronomy and the accelerator physics Evgeny Saldin arXiv:2007.07780v4 [physics.class-ph] 2 Jul 2021 Preprint submitted to 5 July 2021 aFourth draft from July 2021 This is the fourth draft. New material has been added to the Chapter 6, Chapter 7. Current draft was also completed by a new section 6.6 where we analyze the potential for exploiting (vertically oriented STEM ) electron microscopes in order to confirm the predictions of the aberration of particle theory. A correct solution of this problem in the earth - based frame ( which rotates around the sun with velocity v ) requires the use of metric tensor even in experiments of first order in the parameter (v/c) since the crossed term in the Langevin metric plays a fundamental role in the non-inertial kinematics of a relativistic-charged-particle beam propagation. If you have any comments, please send an email to [email protected]. 2 *Preface There are many books on the classical subject of special relativity. However, after having spent a number of years, both in relativistic engineering and research with relativity, I have come to the conclusion that there exist a place for a new book. I do believe that the present book is not quite the same as the others, mainly due to attempt to cast light on dark corners. I should make it clear what this little book is not. It is not a textbook on relativity theory. What the book is about is the nature of special relativistic kinematics, its relation to space and time, and the operational interpretation of coordinate transformations. Every theory contains a number of quantities that can be measured by experiment and an expressions that cannot possibly be observed. Whenever we have a theory containing an arbitrary conven- tion, we should examine what parts of the theory depend on the choice of that convention and what parts do not. The distinction is not always made and many authors claim some data to be observable, according to arbitrary conventions, which do not correspond to any physical experiment. This leads to inconsistencies and paradoxes that should be avoided at all cost. The practical approach used in the book should be acceptable to astronomers, space engineers, accelerator engineers, and more generally, relativistic engi- neers. This approach, unusual in the relativistic literature, may be clarified by quoting one of the problems discussed in the text: the new light beam kinematics for rotating frame of references. Since we live on such a rotating (earth-based) frame of reference, difference in relativistic kinematics be- tween rotating and non-rotating frames of reference is of great practical as well as theoretical significance. A correct solution of this problem requires the use of relativistic principles even at low velocities since the first-order terms in (v=c) play a fundamental role in the non-inertial relativistic kine- matics of light propagation. All the results presented here are derived from the ”first principles”, and all steps involving physical principles are given. To preserve a self-consistent style, I place the derivation of auxiliary results in appendices. To help readers form their own opinion on the topics discussed, the end of each chapter has a suggested bibliography together with relevant remarks. The list of references includes only the papers I have consulted directly. A lot of papers remain unmentioned, and for this I apologize. I am grateful to my longtime friends Gianluca Geloni and Vitaly Kocharyan for discussions over many years about much of the material in this book. I should also like to express my thanks to DESY (Deutsches Electronen- Synchrotron) for enabling me to work in this interesting field. 3 Contents 1 Introduction 10 2 A Critical Survey of the Present Approaches to Special Relativity 21 2.1 What is Special Relativity? 21 2.2 Different Approaches to Special Relativity 22 2.3 Myth About the Incorrectness of Galilean Transformations 25 2.4 Myth About the Non-Relativistic Limit of the Lorentz Transformations 26 2.5 Myth about the Constancy of the Speed of Light 27 2.6 Convention-Dependent and Convention-Invariant Parts of the Theory 28 2.7 Myth about the Reality of Relativistic Time Dilation and Length Contraction 29 2.8 Relativistic Particle Dynamics 30 2.9 Mistake in Commonly Used Method of Coupling Fields and Particles 31 2.10 Clarification of the True Content of the ”Single Frame” Theory 33 2.11 Bibliography and Notes 35 3 Space-Time and Its Coordinatization 38 3.1 Introductory Remarks 38 3.2 Choice of Coordinates System in an Inertial Frame 38 3.3 Inertial Frame where a Source of Light is at Rest 39 3.4 Motion of a Light Source With Respect to the Inertial Frame 41 3.5 Discussion 42 3.6 A Clock Resynchronization Procedure 43 3.7 Bibliography and Notes 45 4 Aberration of Light Phenomenon. Inertial Frame of Reference 47 4 4.1 Introductory Remarks 47 4.2 The ”Plane Wave” Emitter 47 4.3 A Moving Emitter. The ”Single Frame” Description 48 4.4 A Moving Emitter. Explanation on the Basis of the Lorentz Transformations 52 4.5 Reflection from a Mirror Moving Transversely. Mistake in Existing Theory 53 4.6 Way to Solve the Emitter-Mirror Problem in the (3+1) Space and Time 56 4.7 Covariant Way to Solve the Emitter-Mirror Problem 59 4.8 Discussion 61 4.9 Large Aperture Mirror 63 4.10 Analysis of Transmission through a Hole in a Opaque Screen 64 4.11 Spatiotemporal Transformation of the Transmitted Light Beam 65 4.12 Applicability of the Ray Optics 66 4.13 Measure of Aberration 68 4.14 Moving Large Aperture Emitter 69 4.15 Bibliography and Notes 72 5 Aberration of Light Phenomenon. Noninertial Frame of Reference 74 5.1 Introductory Remarks 74 5.2 Absolute Time Coordinatization in the Accelerated Systems 75 5.3 The Asymmetry between the Inertial and Accelerated Frames 76 5.4 A Resynchronization of the Accelerated Clocks 79 5.5 A Single Moving Emitter in a Noninertial Frame of Reference 80 5.6 A Useful Analogy 83 5.7 A Point Source in a Nonertial Frame of Reference 85 5.8 Concept of Reciprocity in the Aberration of Light Theory 87 5 5.9 Explanation of the Aberration on the Basis of Electrodynamics 89 5.10 Explanation of the Aberration on the Basis of the Ether Theory 91 5.11 Bibliography and Notes 94 6 Notion of Ordinary Space in Special Relativity 95 6.1 Inertial Frame View of Observations of the Noninertial Observer 95 6.2 The Non-Existence of an Instantaneous 3-Space 100 6.3 Acceleration of a Rigid Body and Special Relativity 102 6.4 Discussion 105 6.5 Aberration of Relativistic Particles 106 6.6 Explanation of the Aberration of Electrons on the Basis of Electrodynamics 109 6.7 Bibliography and Notes 112 7 Special Relativity. Absence of Reciprocity 113 7.1 Time Dilation 113 7.2 Light-Clock. Observations of the Noninertial Observer 114 7.3 Experimental Evidence for the Absence of Reciprocity 117 7.4 Pseudo-gravitation Field and the Langevin Metric 118 7.5 Bibliography and Notes 122 8 Space and Time Coordinates in an Inertial Frame 123 8.1 Active and Passive Transformations 123 8.2 Two Metrics 126 8.3 Metrics Connected with Optics of Moving Media and Light Sources 126 8.4 Bibliography and Notes 130 9 Stellar Aberration 131 9.1 A New Approach to the Stellar Aberration 131 9.2 Heliocentric Inertial Frame of Reference 134 6 9.3 Earth-Based Non-Inertial Frame of Reference 135 9.4 Region of Applicability 137 9.5 Bibliography and Notes 138 10 Relativistic Particle Dynamics 140 10.1 Manifestly Covariant Particle Dynamics 140 10.2 Conventional Particle Tracking. Hidden Absolute Time Coordinatization 141 10.3 Incorrect Expansion of the Relation dτ = dt/γ to an Arbitrary Motion 144 10.4 The Usual Integration of the 4D Covariant Equation of Motion 145 10.5 Covariant Particle Tracking 147 10.6 Convention-Invariant Particle Tracking 149 10.7 The Nature of Mass 151 10.8 Bibliography and Notes 154 11 Relativity and Electrodynamics 156 11.1 Why did the Error in Radiation Theory Remain so Long Undetected? 157 11.2 An Illustrative Example 159 11.3 Bibliography and Notes 171 12 Synchrotron Radiation 172 12.1 Introductory Remarks 172 12.2 Paraxial Approximation for the Radiation Field 173 12.3 Undulator Radiation 174 12.4 Synchrotron Radiation from Bending Magnets 185 12.5 How to Solve Problems Involving Many Trajectory Kicks 193 12.6 Synchrotron Radiation in the Case of Particle Motion on a Helix 197 12.7 Bibliography and Notes 203 7 13 Relativity and X-Ray Free Electron Lasers 205 13.1 Introductory Remarks 205 13.2 Modulation Wavefront Orientation 208 13.3 XFEL Radiation Setup 210 13.4 Modulation Wavefront Tilt in Maxwell’s Theory. Logical Inconsistency 216 13.5 Bibliography and Notes 219 14 Kinematics of the Wigner Rotation 222 14.1 Introductory Remarks 222 14.2 The Commutativity of Collinear Lorentz Boosts 222 14.3 The Noncommutativity of Two Lorentz Boosts in Nonparallel Directions 223 14.4 Wigner Rotation 224 14.5 How to Measure a Wigner rotation? 225 14.6 Wigner Rotation and the Reciprocity 227 14.7 Bibliography and Notes 229 15 Relativistic Spin Dynamics 230 15.1 Introductory Remarks 230 15.2 Magnetic Dipole at Rest in an Electromagnetic Field 230 15.3 Derivation of the Covariant (BMT) Equation of Motion of Spin 231 15.4 Change Spin Variables 233 15.5 An Alternative Approach to the BMT Theory 234 15.6 Spin Tracking 236 15.7 Spin Rotation in the Limit g 0 as Dynamics Effect 239 ! 15.8 Incorrect Expression for Wigner Rotation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accelerator and Beam Physics Research Goals and Opportunities
    Accelerator and Beam Physics Research Goals and Opportunities Working group: S. Nagaitsev (Fermilab/U.Chicago) Chair, Z. Huang (SLAC/Stanford), J. Power (ANL), J.-L. Vay (LBNL), P. Piot (NIU/ANL), L. Spentzouris (IIT), and J. Rosenzweig (UCLA) Workshops conveners: Y. Cai (SLAC), S. Cousineau (ORNL/UT), M. Conde (ANL), M. Hogan (SLAC), A. Valishev (Fermilab), M. Minty (BNL), T. Zolkin (Fermilab), X. Huang (ANL), V. Shiltsev (Fermilab), J. Seeman (SLAC), J. Byrd (ANL), and Y. Hao (MSU/FRIB) Advisors: B. Dunham (SLAC), B. Carlsten (LANL), A. Seryi (JLab), and R. Patterson (Cornell) January 2021 Abbreviations and Acronyms 2D two-dimensional 3D three-dimensional 4D four-dimensional 6D six-dimensional AAC Advanced Accelerator Concepts ABP Accelerator and Beam Physics DOE Department of Energy FEL Free-Electron Laser GARD General Accelerator R&D GC Grand Challenge H- a negatively charged Hydrogen ion HEP High-Energy Physics HEPAP High-Energy Physics Advisory Panel HFM High-Field Magnets KV Kapchinsky-Vladimirsky (distribution) ML/AI Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence NCRF Normal-Conducting Radio-Frequency NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration NSF National Science Foundation OHEP Office of High Energy Physics QED Quantum Electrodynamics rf radio-frequency RMS Root Mean Square SCRF Super-Conducting Radio-Frequency USPAS US Particle Accelerator School WG Working Group 1 Accelerator and Beam Physics 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Accelerators are a key capability for enabling discoveries in many fields such as Elementary Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics, and Materials Sciences. While recognizing the past dramatic successes of accelerator-based particle physics research, the April 2015 report of the Accelerator Research and Development Subpanel of HEPAP [1] recommended the development of a long-term vision and a roadmap for accelerator science and technology to enable future DOE HEP capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics and Modeling
    BNL-52379 CAP-94-93R ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND MODELING ZOHREH PARSA, EDITOR PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND MODELING Brookhaven National Laboratory UPTON, NEW YORK 11973 ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, INC. UNDER CONTRACT NO. DE-AC02-76CH00016 WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the Unite1 States Government Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, doea not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recomm.ndation, or favoring by the UnitedStates Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof- Printed in the United States of America Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfieid, VA 22161 NTIS price codes: Am&mffi TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic, Author Page no. Forward, Z . Parsa, Brookhaven National Lab. i Physics of High Brightness Beams , 1 M. Reiser, University of Maryland . Radio Frequency Beam Conditioner For Fast-Wave 45 Free-Electron Generators of Coherent Radiation Li-Hua NSLS Dept., Brookhaven National Lab, and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics Third Edition
    Preface Accelerator science took off in the 20th century. Accelerator scientists invent many in- novative technologies to produce and manipulate high energy and high quality beams that are instrumental to progresses in natural sciences. Many kinds of accelerators serve the need of research in natural and biomedical sciences, and the demand of applications in industry. In the 21st century, accelerators will become even more important in applications that include industrial processing and imaging, biomedical research, nuclear medicine, medical imaging, cancer therapy, energy research, etc. Accelerator research aims to produce beams in high power, high energy, and high brilliance frontiers. These beams addresses the needs of fundamental science research in particle and nuclear physics, condensed matter and biomedical sciences. High power beams may ignite many applications in industrial processing, energy production, and national security. Accelerator Physics studies the interaction between the charged particles and elec- tromagnetic field. Research topics in accelerator science include generation of elec- tromagnetic fields, material science, plasma, ion source, secondary beam production, nonlinear dynamics, collective instabilities, beam cooling, beam instrumentation, de- tection and analysis, beam manipulation, etc. The textbook is intended for graduate students who have completed their graduate core-courses including classical mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, and statistical mechanics. I have tried to emphasize the fundamental physics behind each innovative idea with least amount of mathematical complication. The textbook may also be used by advanced undergraduate seniors who have completed courses on classical mechanics and electromagnetism. For beginners in accelerator physics, one begins with Secs. 2.I–2.IV in Chapter 2, and follows by Secs.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics Alid Engineering 3Rd Printing
    Handbook of Accelerator Physics alid Engineering 3rd Printing edited by Alexander Wu Chao Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Maury Tigner Carneil University World Scientific lbh NEW JERSEY • LONDON • SINGAPORE • BEIJING • SHANGHAI • HONG KONG • TAIPEI • CHENNAI Table of Contents Preface 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK 1 1.2 NOMENCLATURE 1 1.3 FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS 3 1.4 UNITS AND CONVERSIONS 4 1.4.1 Units A. W. Chao 4 1.4.2 Conversions M. Tigner 4 1.5 FUNDAMENTAL FORMULAE A. W. Chao 5 1.5.1 Special Functions 5 1.5.2 Curvilinear Coordinate Systems 6 1.5.3 Electromagnetism 6 1.5.4 Kinematical Relations 7 1.5.5 Vector Analysis 8 1.5.6 Relativity 8 1.6 GLOSSARY OF ACCELERATOR TYPES 8 1.6.1 Antiproton Sources J. Peoples, J.P. Marriner 8 1.6.2 Betatron M. Tigner 10 1.6.3 Colliders J. Rees 11 1.6.4 Cyclotron H. Blosser 13 1.6.5 Electrostatic Accelerator J. Ferry 16 1.6.6 FFAG Accelerators M.K. Craddock 18 1.6.7 Free-Electron Lasers C. Pellegrini 21 1.6.8 High Voltage Electrodynamic Accelerators M. Cleland 25 1.6.9 Induction Linacs R. Bangerter 28 1.6.10 Industrial Applications of Electrostatic Accelerators G. Norton, J.L. Duggan 30 1.6.11 Linear Accelerators for Electron G.A. Loew 31 1.6.12 Linear Accelerators for Protons S. Henderson, A. Aleksandrov 34 1.6.13 Livingston Chart J. Rees 38 1.6.14 Medical Applications of Accelerators J. Alonso 38 1.6.14.1 Radiation therapy 38 1.6.14.2 Radioisotopes 40 1.6.15 Microtron P.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics for Health Physicist by D. Cossairt
    Accelerator Physics for Health Physicists J. Donald Cossairt Ph.D., C.H.P. Applied Scientist III Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Introduction • Goal is to improve knowledge and appreciation of the art of particle accelerator physics • Accelerator health physicists should understand how the machines work. • Accelerators have unique operational characteristics of importance to radiation protection. – For their own understanding – To promote communication with accelerator physicists, operators, and experimenters • This course will not make you an accelerator PHYSICIST! – Limitations of both time and level prescript that. – For those who want to learn more, academic courses and the U. S. Particle Accelerator School provide much comprehensive opportunities. • Much of the material is found in several of the references. – Particularly clear or unique descriptions are cited among these. 2 A word about notation • Vector notation will be used extensively. – Vectors are printed in italic boldface (e.g., E) – Their corresponding magnitudes are shown in italics (e.g., E). • Variable names generally will follow the published literature. • Consistency has not been achieved. – This author cannot fix that by himself! – Chose to remain close to the literature – Watch the context! 3 Summary of relativistic relationships including Maxwell’s equations • Special theory of relativity is important. • Accelerators work because of Maxwell’s equations. •Therest energy of a particle Wo is connected to its rest mass mo by the speed of light c: 2 Wmcoo= (1) • Total energy W of a particle moving with velocity v is 2 22mco W 1 Wmc== =γ mco γ == , (2) 2 2 1− β , with Wo 1− β β = v/c, m is the relativistic mass, and γ is the relativistic parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah M. Cousineau
    Sarah M. Cousineau Section Head: Accelerator Science and Technology, Spallation Neutron Source Spallation Neutron Source Phone: +1 865 406 0294 PO Box 2008, MS 6461 [email protected] Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6461 Current Job Responsibilities: • Lead the Accelerator Science and Technology group at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) accelerator: § Lead the production, measurement, understanding and analysis of the SNS 1.4 MW H- linac and ring proton beams § Define and oversee a robust R&D program targeted at high intensity, high power beams § Define and oversee an effective mechanical engineering design program that supports both beam operations and accelerator R&D § Manage the beam study program aimed at identifying, understanding, and mitigating accelerator performance limitations § Guide and facilitate strategic plans for accelerator performance improvements, and software tools for efficient modeling and analysis of the beam § Manage the section budget and provide professional development opportunities for staff § Promote a strong culture of safety in all activities § Participate in outreach and professional community service roles Education: • 2003 Ph.D. (Accelerator Physics), Indiana University • 2000 M.S. (Accelerator Physics), Indiana University • 1998 B.S. (Physics, summa cum laude), University of North Dakota Research Interests: • Collective effects in high intensity beams, space charge and instabilities • Novel injection methods for proton drivers • Laser and ion beam interactions • Code development and simulation of high intensity beams • Novel beam diagnostics and measurement techniques • High power beam collimation • High current and duty factor H- ion sources Professional Experience: 07/2020 – present Section Head, Accelerator Science and Technology 01/2016 – 07/2020 Group Leader, Beam Science and Technology group, Spallation Neutron Source 02/2012 – 07/2020 Joint Faculty Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee 1 Sarah M.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Physics of Colliders
    1 31. Accelerator Physics of Colliders 31. Accelerator Physics of Colliders Revised August 2019 by M.J. Syphers (Northern Illinois U.; FNAL) and F. Zimmermann (CERN). This article provides background for the High-Energy Collider Parameter Tables that follow and some additional information. 31.1 Luminosity The number of events, Nexp, is the product of the cross section of interest, σexp, and the time integral over the instantaneous luminosity, L: Z Nexp = σexp × L(t)dt. (31.1) Today’s colliders all employ bunched beams. If two bunches containing n1 and n2 particles collide head-on with average collision frequency fcoll, a basic expression for the luminosity is n1n2 L = fcoll ∗ ∗ F (31.2) 4πσxσy ∗ ∗ where σx and σy characterize the rms transverse beam sizes in the horizontal (bend) and vertical directions at the interaction point, and F is a factor of order 1, that takes into account geometric effects such as a crossing angle and finite bunch length, and dynamic effects, such as the mutual focusing of the two beam during the collision. For a circular collider, fcoll equals the number of bunches per beam times the revolution frequency. In 31.2, it is assumed that the bunches are identical in transverse profile, that the profiles are Gaussian and independent of position along the bunch, and the particle distributions are not altered during bunch crossing. Nonzero beam crossing angles θc in the horizontal plane and long bunches (rms bunch length σz) will reduce the luminosity, 2 1/2 ∗ e.g., by a factor F ≈ 1/(1 + φ ) , where the parameter φ ≡ θcσz/(2σx) is known as the Piwinski angle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History and Review of Accelerators
    A BRIEF HISTORY AND REVIEW OF ACCELERATORS P.J. Bryant CERN, Geneva, Switzerland ABSTRACT The history of accelerators is traced from three separate roots, through a rapid development to the present day. The well-known Livingston chart is used to illustrate how spectacular this development has been with, on average, an increase of one and a half orders of magnitude in energy per decade, since the early thirties. Several present-day accelerators are reviewed along with plans and hopes for the future. 1 . INTRODUCTION High-energy physics research has always been the driving force behind the development of particle accelerators. They started life in physics research laboratories in glass envelopes sealed with varnish and putty with shining electrodes and frequent discharges, but they have long since outgrown this environment to become large-scale facilities offering services to large communities. Although the particle physics community is still the main group, they have been joined by others of whom the synchrotron light users are the largest and fastest growing. There is also an increasing interest in radiation therapy in the medical world and industry has been a long-time user of ion implantation and many other applications. Consequently accelerators now constitute a field of activity in their own right with professional physicists and engineers dedicated to their study, construction and operation. This paper will describe the early history of accelerators, review the important milestones in their development up to the present day and take a preview of future plans and hopes. 2 . HISTORICAL ROOTS The early history of accelerators can be traced from three separate roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativity, EM Forces - Historical Introduction
    Accelerator Physics Alex Bogacz (Jefferson Lab) / [email protected] Geoff Krafft (Jefferson Lab/ODU) / [email protected] Timofey Zolkin (U. Chicago/Fermilab) / [email protected] Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy USPAS, Fort Collins, CO, June 10-21, 2013 1 Introductions and Outline Syllabus Week 1 Week 2 Introduction Course logistics, Homework, Exam: http://casa/publications/USPAS_Summer_2013.shtml Relativistic mechanics review Relativistic E&M review, Cyclotrons Survey of accelerators and accelerator concepts Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy 2 Syllabus – week 1 Mon 10 June 0900-1200 Lecture 1 ‘Relativity, EM Forces - Historical Introduction Mon 10 June 1330-1630 Lecture 2 ‘Weak focusing and Transverse Stability’ Tue 11 June 0900-1200 Lecture 3 ‘Linear Optics’ Tue 11 June 1330-1630 Lecture 4 ‘Phase Stability, Synchrotron Motion’ Wed 12 June 0900-1200 Lecture 5 ‘Magnetic Multipoles, Magnet Design’ Wed 12 June 1330-1630 Lecture 6 ‘Particle Acceleration’ Thu 13 June 0900-1200 Lecture 7 ‘Coupled Betatron Motion I’ Thu 13 June 1330-1630 Lecture 8 ‘Synchrotron Radiation’ Fri 14 June 0900-1200 Lecture 9 ‘Coupled Betatron Motion II’ Fri 14 June 1330-1530 Lecture 10 ‘Radiation Distributions’ Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lecture 1Accelerator− Relativity, Physics EM Forces, Intro Operated
    [Show full text]
  • PHY 564 Advanced Accelerator Physics
    1 PHY 564 Advanced Accelerator Physics Vladimir N. Litvinenko Yichao Jing Gang Wang Department of Physics & Astronomy, Stony Brook University Collider-Accelerator Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory PHY 564 Fall 2015 Lecture 1 2 Plan to teach you about: • The fundamental physics and in depth exploration of advanced methods of modern particle accelerators • Theoretical concept related to the above • Principle of least actions, relativistic mechanics and E&D, 4D notations • N-dimensional phase space, Canonical transformations, simplecticity and invariants of motion • Relativistic beams, Reference orbit and Accelerator Hamiltonian • Parameterization of linear motion in accelerators, Transport matrices, matrix functions, Sylvester's formula, stability of the motion • Invariants of motion, Canonical transforms to the action and phase variables, emittance of the beam, perturbation methods. Poincare diagrams • Standard problems in accelerators: closed orbit, excitation of oscillations, radiation damping and quantum excitation, natural emittance • Non-linear effects, Lie algebras and symplectic maps • Vlasov and Fokker-Plank equations, collective instabilities & Landau Damping • Spin motion in accelerators • Types and Components of Accelerators PHY 564 Fall 2015 Lecture 1 3 Learning goals • Have full understanding of transverse and longitudinal particles dynamics in accelerators • Being capable of solving problems arising in modern accelerator theory • Understand modern methods in accelerator physics • Being capable to fully understand modern accelerator literature PHY 564 Fall 2015 Lecture 1 4 Materials • Lecture notes presented after each class should be used as the main text. Presently there is no textbook, which covers the material of this course. • Some material can be found in my note which summarizes USPAS lectures: http://www0.bnl.gov/isd/documents/74289.pdf Optional: • H.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering for Particle Accelerators
    Engineering for Particle Accelerators Vyacheslav Yakovlev U.S. Particle Accelerator School (USPAS) Education in Beam Physics and Accelerator Technology 19 June 2017 Engineering for Particle Accelerators Instructors: Vyacheslav Yakovlev, Timergali Khabiboulline, Thomas Nicol and Vladimir Kashikhin, Fermilab, Batavia One-week course at USPAS 2017, Lisle, Il June 19-23, 2017 Purpose and Audience: The purpose of this course is to give an engineering foundation to the development of modern particle accelerators. This course is suitable for graduate students, senior undergraduate students, and engineers interested in particle accelerator design and development. The course will focus on large-scale proton superconducting linear particle accelerators. Prerequisites Undergraduate-level electromagnetism, classical mechanics, RF and mechanical engineering courses. It is the responsibility of the student to ensure that he or she meets the course prerequisites or has equivalent experience. 2 6/19/2017 V. Yakovlev | Engineering in Particle Accelerators Engineering for Particle Accelerators Objectives Students will learn basic principles of the engineering design of large- scale proton superconducting linear particle accelerators. Upon completing this course, students will be familiar with the principles, approach, and basic technique of the design of the main components in superconducting linear accelerators, and be able to perform basic analysis on their performance. Instructional Method The course will consist of lectures and daily homework assignments on the fundamentals of engineering of superconducting linear particle accelerators. 3 6/19/2017 V. Yakovlev | Engineering in Particle Accelerators Engineering for Particle Accelerators Course Content * The course will cover the fundamentals of accelerator engineering and provide examples and exercises in the practical design of the main accelerator components.
    [Show full text]
  • Tune and Chromaticity Diagnostics
    Tune and chromaticity diagnostics R. J. Steinhagen CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract Tune and chromaticity, the oscillation frequency of the transverse motion and its dependence on the particle's momentum, are important observables that are used to estimate, measure, and control beam stability in circular accelerators. They are also the first, low-order, non-trivial beam parameters that cannot be directly derived by a single beam instrument. This contribution summarizes diagnostics methods to estimate tune and chromaticity and aims to highlight less obvious key experimental aspects. 1 Introduction The beam particle's tune, defined as the frequency of the transverse oscillation, and chromaticity as its dependence on particle momentum, require precise control as they may drive self-amplified instabilities leading to an increase in beam size, chaotic particle motion, and therefore, particle loss. Furthermore, since tune and chromaticity can be measured with great precision and small systematic errors, they provide valuable diagnostics for a variety of higher-order beam physics processes such as measurement of beam optics, effects related to machine impedance, beam–beam, electron-cloud, and other collective effects. The concept of tune and chromaticity in particle accelerators finds analogies in other physics do- mains such as acoustics (e.g., musical string vibration) or light (e.g., refraction and decomposition of light according to its wavelength in prisms and lenses). Similar to the refraction index n that defines the bending angle of light on its wavelength (or equivalently its photon energy), in accelerators chromaticity describes the dependence of the tune on momentum. The range of tunes providing stable beam condi- tions is typically limited.
    [Show full text]