DOCSLIB.ORG

Railcar Market Update September 18Th, 2019 Forward-Looking Statements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RAILCAR MARKET UPDATE SEPTEMBER 18TH, 2019 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Statements in this Presentation not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, accordingly, involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those discussed. These include statements as to our future expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events, conditions, financial performance, prospects, or future events. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” ”outlook,” “continue,” “likely,” “will,” “would”, and similar words and phrases. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by us and our management, are inherently uncertain. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made, and are not guarantees of future performance. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements. The following factors, in addition to those discussed in our other filings with the SEC, including our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and subsequent reports on Form 10-Q, could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations expressed in forward-looking statements: . exposure to damages, fines, criminal and civil penalties, and reputational harm arising . reduced opportunities to generate asset remarketing income from a negative outcome in litigation, including claims arising from an accident involving . operational and financial risks related to our affiliate investments, including the Rolls-Royce & Partners Finance our railcars joint ventures (collectively the "RRPF affiliates") . inability to maintain our assets on lease at satisfactory rates due to oversupply of . fluctuations in foreign exchange rates railcars in the market or other changes in supply and demand . failure to successfully negotiate collective bargaining agreements with the unions representing a substantial . a significant decline in customer demand for our railcars or other assets or services, portion of our employees including as a result of: . asset impairment charges we may be required to recognize ◻ weak macroeconomic conditions . deterioration of conditions in the capital markets, reductions in our credit ratings, or increases in our financing ◻ weak market conditions in our customers' businesses costs ◻ declines in harvest or production volumes . Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 ◻ adverse changes in the price of, or demand for, commodities . competitive factors in our primary markets, including competitors with a significantly lower cost of capital than ◻ changes in railroad operations or efficiency GATX ◻ changes in supply chains . risks related to our international operations and expansion into new geographic markets, including the ◻ availability of pipelines, trucks, and other alternative modes of transportation imposition of new or additional tariffs, quotas, or trade barriers ◻ other operational or commercial needs or decisions of our customers . changes in, or failure to comply with, laws, rules, and regulations . higher costs associated with increased railcar assignments following non-renewal of . inability to obtain cost-effective insurance leases, customer defaults, and compliance maintenance programs or other maintenance . environmental remediation costs initiatives . inadequate allowances to cover credit losses in our portfolio . events having an adverse impact on assets, customers, or regions where we have a . inability to maintain and secure our information technology infrastructure from cybersecurity threats and concentrated investment exposure related disruption of our business . financial and operational risks associated with long-term railcar purchase commitments, including increased costs due to tariffs or trade disputes 2 WHO IS GATX? True “full-service” Leading lessor of Global railcar railcar provider 121 year-old railroad rolling stock investor with with 9 significant Chicago-based with 148k railcars operations in North repair facilities company with $8 and over 600 America, Europe, throughout U.S., billion in assets locomotives India, and Russia Canada, and Poland 3 NORTH AMERICA – INDUSTRY RAILCAR OWNERSHIP Approximately 1.6 million railcars NORTH AMERICAN FLEET RAILROADS (18%) LESSORS (54%) BY CAR TYPE . Ownership of railcars has been . Shift from railroad- and shipper- 5% declining owned railcars to lessor market . Virtually no tank car ownership due share 7% to complexities and regulations . Lessors dominate the tank car 8% . Focus of capital investment segment due to complex 34% on infrastructure services and compliance requirements 18% 21% 18% 54% 25% SHIPPERS (18%) 10% TTX (10%) . Shipper market share has . Fleet is predominantly focused 34% Covered Hopper been relatively constant since on intermodal, flat cars, and 25% Tank 2008 at ~18% boxcars 21% Open Top 8% Flat . Alternative focus of capital on . Overall market share has core business versus railcar remained steady since 2008 7% Boxcar investments at ~10% of the North 5% Intermodal American fleet Approximately 1.6 million railcars Source: Umler as of January 2019 4 NORTH AMERICA – TANK & FREIGHT INDUSTRY OWNERSHIP RAILCARS BY TYPE TANK CAR OWNERSHIP SHARE (Based on approximately 1.6 million railcars) 19% 5% 81% Lessor 7% 19% Shipper/Other 25% <1% Railroad 8% Based on approximately 410,000 tank cars 81% 21% FREIGHT CAR OWNERSHIP SHARE 34% 13% 45% Lessor 18% 45% 24% Railroad 25% Tank 8% Flatcar 18% Shipper/Other 34% Covered Hopper 7% Boxcar 13% TTX 21% Open Top 5% Intermodal Based on approximately 1.2 million 24% freight cars Source: Umler as of January 2019 5 NORTH AMERICA – LESSOR MARKET SHARE LESSOR OWNERSHIP SHARE TANK CAR LESSOR OWNERSHIP SHARE (Based on approximately 876,000 lessor-owned railcars) 2% 10% 18% 18% GATX 8% 36% Union Tank Car 14% 17% Trinity 23% 9% 9% CIT 8% SMBC 36% 2% Wells Fargo Rail 16% 17% 10% Other 6% Based on approximately 332,000 lessor-owned tank cars FREIGHT CAR LESSOR OWNERSHIP SHARE 13% 15% 9% 9% GATX 13% 26% Wells Fargo Rail 32% 15% CIT 11% Trinity 14% GATX 13% Trinity 26% 5% SMBC 16% Wells Fargo Rail 6% SMBC 2% Union Tank Car 15% Union Tank Car 23% Other 32% Other 13% CIT 2% 11% 15% Based on approximately 528,000 5% lessor-owned freight cars Source: Umler as of January 2019 6 NORTH AMERICA – NEW RAILCAR BACKLOG 160,000 . Cyclicality of the industry is illustrated 140,000 by the backlog of orders at the railcar manufacturers 120,000 . The 2013 and 2014 spike in tank car 100,000 backlog was primarily due to the crude/ 80,000 fracking boom . Backlogs have 60,000 moderated post-crude boom but remain high relative to history and 40,000 relative to carload demand 20,000 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12 ’13 ‘14 ’15 ’16 ’17 ’18 ’19 Number of Tank Number of Freight Source: Railway Supply Institute as of July 2019 7 Source: American Metal Market (AMM) SCRAP SCRAP PRICING 8 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00 $500.00 $600.00 $0.00 Feb-75 Mar-76 Apr-77 May-78 Jun-79 Jul-80 Aug-81 Sep-82 Oct-83 Nov-84 Dec-85 Jan-87 Feb-88 PRICING STEEL MELT HEAVY CHICAGO#1 Mar-89 Apr-90 AMERICAN METAL MARKET MARKET METAL AMERICAN May-91 Jun-92 1975 Jul-93 Aug-94 - Sep-95 YTD 2019 Oct-96 Nov-97 Dec-98 Jan-00 Feb-01 Mar-02 Apr-03 May-04 Jun-05 Jul-06 Aug-07 Sep-08 Oct-09 Nov-10 Dec-11 Jan-13 Feb-14 Mar-15 Apr-16 May-17 Jun-18 Jul-19 MEDIUM CUBE COVERED HOPPERS General-Purpose Cars Specialty Cars 5,200CF gravity-discharge 4,800 CF carbon black 4,300CF gravity-discharge 5,200CF gravity-pneumatic-discharge for sugar 9 MEDIUM CUBE COVERED HOPPER FLEET 25,000 9.0% 20,000 6.0% 15,000 10,000 3.0% 5,000 - 0.0% (5,000) -3.0% (10,000) (15,000) -6.0% (20,000) (25,000) -9.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2Q19 New Car Deliveries Scrap Net Change in Fleet Size (%) Note: Fleet size as of January of respective year. Source: Umler 10 MEDIUM CUBE COVERED HOPPER FLEET BY CAR TYPE BY OWNER 10,878 8,559 1,301 44,487 80,933 139,710 79,943 162,469 263 Gravity 286 Gravity 263 Specialty 286 Specialty Other Lessor Railroad Shipper/Other Total N.A. Fleet: 264,140 Source: Umler as of 7/1/2019 11 COVERED HOPPER MARKET OUTLOOK . Grain cars are “easy” to speculate on for new entrant lessors . Most railcar manufacturers build grain cars, driving speculative production . Weather, tariffs, PSR, and cheap money have all contributed to oversupply . Long-term rotation underway from 4750 to 5200 to modern “short” cars . Specialized cars (sugar, carbon black, PTA) not generally subject to oversupply 12 BOXCARS 50’ Plate C Sliding-Door 50’ Plate F Single-Plug-Door 60’ Plate F Double-Plug-Door 13 BOXCAR FLEET BREAKDOWN Ownership • 39% Lessor (42k) 70T Rigid • 33% Railroad (36k) 17,778 • 1% Shipper (1k) • 27% TTX (29k) 70T Cushioned 110T 18,189 Cushioned 54,688 100T Rigid 100T The “Boxcar Cliff”: Cushioned Over 53,000 cars, most built 12,555 between 1975 and 1981 Total N.A. Fleet: 108,075 Source: Umler as of 7/1/2019 14 BOXCAR NEW CAR DELIVERIES 5,000 3.5% 4,500 3.0% 4,000 Forecasted Builds 2.5% 3,500 8,975 3,000 2.0% 2,500 1.5% 2,000 Deliveries 1,500 1.0% of Fleet a % as Deliveries 1,000 0.5% 500 - 0.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 New Car Deliveries Replacement Level % of Fleet Source: ARCI, FTR Associates, Umler Note: 2019 fleet as of 2Q19.
Recommended publications
  • N.Y. C. Oval System Evolution and Applications

    N.Y. C. Oval System Evolution and Applications

    NEW YORK THE NEW YORK (ENTR-AL CENTRAL LINES N.Y. C. OVAL SYSTEM EVOLUTION AND APPLICATIONS PART ONE BY H. L. VAIL JR. N.Y. C. S- 337400 Container Car, Lot C- 100, 18" x 9" Oval, Red car with Red container s . The New York Central Oval, reportedly suggested by an cars, the background of the "Oval" was painted black. On employee in about 1904, underwent. a seri el of minor container cars, Lot C.l 01 and C-1 OZ the cars were painted changes during ita .use until the major design in 1958 black, the containers were red, except for refrigerated when the col or-: one was designed for use on the "New" jacle containers, which were whit e. green cars. This article covers the period up to thi e Z) Flat Cars, and Speei al Flat Cars with higher side sills change. The original herald had Roman capital letters used the lZ" high oval. All cars were painted black. and was designed in five sizes for the "New York Central Lines"andusedas follows on revenue service cars. It 3) All "Self Clearing" Hopper care, Gondola cars and Hop­ was, of course, used on other equipment, bridges, and per Bottom Gondola cars painted black. Double Deck as the of fi cial company 1 ogo. Stock cars painted red, with the background of the oval NYC Lines Super- painted black. The Double Deck Stock cars had the panel Dwg. No. Oval * Used On seded Date on which· the herald was painted mounted on the upper part &: Date Size By of the car side just below the eaves.
  • The Impact of Jumbo Covered Hopper Cars on Kansas Shortline Railroads

    The Impact of Jumbo Covered Hopper Cars on Kansas Shortline Railroads

    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-04-3 FINAL REPORT THE IMPACT OF JUMBO COVERED HOPPER CARS ON KANSAS SHORTLINE RAILROADS Michael W. Babcock James Sanderson Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas SEPTEMBER 2004 K-TRAN A COOPERATIVE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PROGRAM BETWEEN: KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-04-3 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date THE IMPACT OF JUMBO COVERED HOPPER CARS ON KANSAS September 2004 SHORTLINE RAILROADS 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 8 Performing Organization Report Michael W. Babcock and James Sanderson No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Department of Economics; 317 Waters Hall 11 Contract or Grant No. Manhattan, Kansas 66506-4001 C1401 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Materials and Research Final Report 700 SW Harrison Street June 2003 - July 2004 Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0338-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. 16 Abstract Class I railroads have been replacing 263,000-pound (loaded weight) covered hopper cars capable of handling 100 tons of grain with 286,000-pound covered hopper cars that can handle 111 tons. While these heavier cars provide a decrease in railroad cost per ton-mile for the Class I (Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe) Railroads; they will cause a significant increase in operating and maintenance costs for the shortline railroads in the state of Kansas.
  • Cooperative Research in Tank Car Safety Design

    Cooperative Research in Tank Car Safety Design

    00_TRN_286_TRN_286 7/11/13 5:04 PM Page 12 Testing of tank car thermal protection at the Transportation Technology Center near Pueblo, Colorado, in the early 1970s helped quantify the rate of heat transfer into a tank under intense fire conditions. Railroads and Research Sharing Track Cooperative Research in Tank Car Safety Design How Science and Engineering Are Reducing the Risk of Rail Transport of Hazardous Materials CHRISTOPHER P. L. BARKAN, M. RAPIK SAAT, FRANCISCO GONZÁLEZ, III, AND TODD T. TREICHEL ailroad tank car safety in North America has improved continuously through Barkan is Professor, Department of Civil and cooperative testing, research, and standards development by industry and Environmental Engineering, and Executive government. Although much of this progress has been evolutionary, in recent Director, Rail Transportation and Engineering R decades more revolutionary approaches have taken hold. Center, University of Illinois at Urbana– The railroad, tank car, and petrochemical industries have worked together with Champaign. Saat is Research Assistant the government to develop and improve safety design standards for tank cars since Professor, University of Illinois at Urbana– the early 20th century (1). In 1903, the Master Car Builders’ Association formed the Champaign. González is Hazardous Materials Committee on Tank Cars, composed of the mechanical officers from several railroads and Tank Car Project Manager, Office of and a representative from Union Tank Line, then the major tank car owner. The com- Research and Development, Federal Railroad mittee recommended practices that were soon established as industry standards for Administration, Washington, D.C. Treichel is the construction and repair of tank cars. Director, Railway Supply Institute–Association The American Railway Association and its successor, the Association of American of American Railroads Railroad Tank Car Safety TR NEWS 286 MAY–JUNE 2013 TR NEWS 286 MAY–JUNE Railroads (AAR), later adopted the standards.
  • Containerized Grain Supply Chain in Western Canada: Opportunities and Regulatory Barriers

    Containerized Grain Supply Chain in Western Canada: Opportunities and Regulatory Barriers

    Containerized Grain Supply Chain in Western Canada: Opportunities and Regulatory Barriers Dr. Barry E. Prentice Professor, Supply Chain Management I.H. Asper School of Business University of Manitoba Synopsis The containerization of grain is a growing trend internationally. Many western Canadian grain shippers would like to source-load containers on the Prairies, but most shippers are forced to trans-load at the ports after their grain arrives by other means. The problem is the Revenue Cap. This regulation creates a double disincentive that discourages the railways from moving grain in containers. In addition to the lost marketing opportunities for farmers, this regulatory barrier impedes the use of containers to serve as an elastic supply of storage and transport during demand surges. The removal of the Revenue Cap would encourage development of a contestable market based on a competitive containerized grain shipping supply chain to rival the bulk system, such that shippers could always receive the lowest cost means of reaching foreign destinations and the best customer service options. Introduction The most significant innovation in transportation during the past 50 years has been the introduction of containerization. Container shipping has grown rapidly because it reduces the cost of port handling, improves cargo security and permits the establishment of global supply chains. As the volume of world trade carried in containers has increased, ship size and port facilities have grown, creating a virtuous cycle of declining costs and expanding service. This productivity is matched on the land side by double-stacked container trains and drayage trucks that have made containerization the preferred global door-to-door logistical system domestically and internationally.
  • Containerized Bulk Handling

    Containerized Bulk Handling

    Containerized Bulk Handling This section contains information on alternative systems for handling bulk commodities. Containerized Bulk Handling Fill Pit To Ship Solutions Containerized Bulk Handling Transport Containerized Bulk Handling Load Process Store www.ramspreaders.com www.cbhgroup.org www.pittoship.com ContainerizedContainerized Bulk Bulk Handling Handling Containerized Bulk Handling Process - Conventional Process Mine Processing Facility Land Transport Load commodity Land Transport Quay Side Wagon Tipper 50 Million USD Ship Loading Port Storage Sheded & ConveConveyorsyo With Revolver ® Load Ship Lift from Storage 80 Million 50 Million USD USD Containerized Bulk Handling ContainerizedRevolver ProductBulk Handling Range Equipment: Integrated Approach Equipment: Revolver® MHC Revolver® Cranes Dust Suppression Ship to Shore Mobile Harbour Reach Stacker Container Handlers Containers Ship Crane Special trailers ContainerizedContainerized Bulk Bulk Handling Handling ContainerizedContainerized Bulk Bulk Handling Handling Equipment: Containers Equipment: Dust Suppression Lid Lifted & Auto open Internal Lockable Reinforcement latch “ICE CUBE-interior design” Low hang up With tapered side walls and curved Rail & Corner casting gussets in corners if required Pit To Ship Solutions Containerized Bulk Handling Containerized Bulk Handling Equipment: Ancillary Consultants Important, WHY? • They recommend us in studies • They help us in implementation • They promote our solution • They Innovate Cranes Mobile Equipment Revolver Specific Trailer Containerized Bulk Handling Containerized Bulk Handling Environment Why we are green # Tips at bottom of hatch so less dust Conventional Operations # Less dust than ship loader as it doesn’t displace as much air # No open stock piles # No clean down of ship loader between commodities In many cases, new projects won’t be approved without the lower environmental impact Containerized Bulk Handling ContainerizedContainerized Bulk Bulk Handling Handling Rotary unloading virtually no dust generated.
  • During the Past Two Decades, the U.S. Housing Finance System Experienced Changes of a Magnitude Unseen Since the New Deal Era

    During the Past Two Decades, the U.S. Housing Finance System Experienced Changes of a Magnitude Unseen Since the New Deal Era

    FOREWORD During the past two decades, the U.S. housing finance system experienced changes of a magnitude unseen since the New Deal era. In the 1980s, the primary mortgage market restructured and consolidated as a result of the savings and loan crisis, adjustable-rate mortgages became widely available, and the secondary mortgage market grew rapidly. The 1990s saw continued industry consolidation, as well as significant technological de- velopments in mortgage finance. In addition, the past decade was a time of considerable innovation in affordable mortgage lending, part of a growing movement to connect his- torically underserved households and communities to the mainstream housing finance system. This volume examines this movement through case studies of organizations recognized by their peers as leaders in expanding homeownership opportunities. In an extension of their earlier research for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the authors describe the efforts of a broad cross section of industry participants, including small and large lenders, nonprofit community-based organizations (CBOs), and lending consortia. They document a wide range of strategies—in the areas of management, out- reach, borrower qualification, and homeowner retention—designed to expand and sus- tain homeownership among lower-income and minority households. The case studies illustrate three notable aspects of recent efforts to extend the reach of homeownership. First, they demonstrate that leaders in the mortgage finance industry view historically underserved populations and communities as viable business markets rather than regulatory burdens, and back this perspective with action. Second, the stud- ies show the vital role that partnership plays in expanding opportunity.
  • GATX Corporation Annual Report 2020

    GATX Corporation Annual Report 2020

    GATX Corporation Annual Report 2020 Form 10-K (NYSE:GATX) Published: February 19th, 2020 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 1-2328 GATX Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) New York 36-1124040 (State or Other Jurisdiction of incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606-7147 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (312) 621-6200 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock GATX New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange 5.625% Senior Notes due 2066 GMTA New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
  • Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments Between Ocean Port, Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning

    Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments Between Ocean Port, Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning

    Final Technical Report TNW2008-08 Research Project Agreement No. 61-5907 Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments between Ocean Port, Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning Kaori Fugisawa Anne Goodchild Research Associate Assistant Professor University of Washington University of Washington Eric Jessup Assistant Professor Washington State University A report prepared for Transportation Northwest (TransNow) University of Washington 135 More Hall, Box 352700 Seattle, Washington 98195-2700 July 2008 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NO. TNW2008-08 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5.REPORT DATE Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments between Ocean Port, July 2008 Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anne Goodchild, Eric Jessup, Kaori Fugisawa TNW2008-08 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Transportation Northwest Regional Center X (TransNow) Box 352700, 129 More Hall University of Washington 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Seattle, WA 98195-2700 DTRS99-G-0010 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED United States Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Final Research Report 400 Seventh St. S.W. 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Washington, D.C. 20590 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the University of Washington and the US Department of Transportation. ABSTRACT The proposed research will address an emerging need by local, state and regional transportation planners and policymakers to better understand the transportation characteristics, functions and dynamics of ocean port-to-handling facility and handling facility-to-final market freight movements.
  • Section 10 Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data

    Section 10 Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data

    General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 LOCOMOTIVE AND ROLLING STOCK DATA General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 Contents 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Locomotives................................................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Freight Rolling Stock ...................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Locomotives ................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Freight Rolling Stock....................................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Locomotives................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Rail Motors ..................................................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Freight Rolling Stock....................................................4 Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd - Special Purpose Rolling Stock..............................................................4
  • EXHIBIT C Lennox Declaration Case 19-11240-LSS Doc 107-4 Filed 06

    EXHIBIT C Lennox Declaration Case 19-11240-LSS Doc 107-4 Filed 06

    Case 19-11240-LSS Doc 107-4 Filed 06/11/19 Page 1 of 55 EXHIBIT C Lennox Declaration RLF1 21403718v.1 Case 19-11240-LSS Doc 107-4 Filed 06/11/19 Page 2 of 55 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : In re: : Chapter 11 : FTD Companies, Inc., et al.,1 : Case No. 19-11240 (LSS) : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : DECLARATION OF HEATHER LENNOX Pursuant to Rule 2014(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"), Rule 2014-1(a) of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Local Rules"), and in accordance with the Guidelines for Reviewing Applications for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11 U.S.C. § 330 by Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, issued by the Executive Office of the United States Trustee (the "U.S. Trustee Guidelines"), I, Heather Lennox, declare: 1. I am an attorney at law admitted and in good standing to practice in the States of New York and Ohio, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio, the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and the Eastern District of Michigan. The Court has entered an order allowing me to appear pro hac vice (D.I. 33). 1 The Debtors are the following 15 entities (the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers, if any, follow in parentheses): FTD Companies, Inc. (5852); Bloom That, Inc.
  • 2016 Annual Report (PDF)

    2016 Annual Report (PDF)

    Our Commitment WELLS FARGO & COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Contents 2 | Letter from Chairman of the Board 4 | Letter from Chief Executive Officer and President 14 | Demonstrating Our Commitment 14 | Homeownership: More than a dream 16 | Journey through retirement 18 | A prescription for caring 20 | Bringing bankers to the kitchen table 22 | A home for hope 24 | Building with smart technology 26 | Helping create affordable housing 28 | A future of efficient freight 30 | A bank for life 32 | Operating Committee and Other Corporate Officers 33 | Board of Directors 34 | 2016 Corporate Social Responsibility Performance 35 | 2016 Financial Report - Financial review - Controls and procedures - Financial statements - Report of independent registered public accounting firm 273 | Stock Performance 2 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Shareholders, Since 1852, Wells Fargo has worked to earn customers’ trust We have enforced senior management accountability by meeting their financial needs and helping them succeed for the damage to Wells Fargo’s reputation through very financially, while maintaining the highest standards of significant compensation actions. The Board accepted integrity. That is why my fellow Board members and I were John Stumpf’s recommendation to forfeit all of his unvested deeply troubled that Wells Fargo violated that trust by equity of approximately $41 million prior to his retirement opening accounts for certain retail banking customers that as Chairman and CEO. The Board required Carrie Tolstedt, they did not request or in some cases even know about. the departed head of Community Banking, to forfeit all This behavior is unacceptable, not only to the Board but of her approximately $19 million of unvested equity.
  • The Last Car Is Changing

    The Last Car Is Changing

    "In the gaudy lexicon of railroad jargon, it has more names than any other property in the economy of the high iron, even more than there are for engines and engine drivers. It is a caboose, the last crummy, way car, van, cage, doghouse, drone house, bouncer, • bedhouse, buggy, chariot, shelter house, glory wagon, go-car, hack, hut, monkey wagon, pavilion, palace, parlor, brainbox, zoo, oar1s diner, kitchen, perambulator, cabin car and shanty. There are probably others in a variety only bounded by the limitations of human imagining and the vocabulary of profane and ohanging uninhibited men." -A Treasury of Railroad Folklore Early version of the caboose. 14 UNION PACIFIC INFO a natural part of every railroad. lookout nest on top lives on in the memories of old-timers who can THEN ... Still, there was a time when the still hear it hustling along far behind No one knows for sure when the conductor parked himself wherever the huffing and puffing steam loco­ "caboose" came into existence. he could ride in the early days. motives of yesteryear. The word dates to the time when it Maybe it was in a boxcar, or lying described either a ship's galley or prone on a flatcar or in the engine ... NOW... the galley's iron cookstoves. One or wherever he could hang on for Today the caboose is still a familiar dictionary says it was derived from awhile. sight on most railroads, although the Dutch work "kabuis" that de­ But the conductor, being are­ some no longer use it on every freight veloped from the Middle Low sourceful soul who played an essen­ train.