Massidda Adriana-The Plan De Emergencia (1956)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Juicio a Las Juntas Militares (Argentina)
Juicio a las juntas militares (Argentina) The 1985 trial of the Argentinean Military Junta Members is an historical trial which saw the prosecution of the leaders of the three first Argentinean juntas of 1976 – 1983. The hearings were held from 22 April to 9 December 1985. Due to the large number of victims, the Court selected 280 emblematic cases among the 709 cases presented by the Prosecution. The Prosecutor’s closing argument, with its “ ¡ nuncas mas !”, remains historical. On 9 December 1985, the verdict stated that the Military Juntas had “developed and implemented a criminal plan to fight terrorism, leaving considerable discretion to the junior officers of the armed forces to imprison those who where described as ‘subversives’ by the intelligence services; to torture them; to subject them to inhumane living conditions; and ultimately to decide freely on the final fate of their victims: being transferred to the legal system (judiciary or police), being released, or being simply executed” (unofficial translation of an extract of the judgment). Jorge Rafael Videla and Emilio Eduardo Massera (first Junta) were sentenced to life imprisonment. Roberto Eduardo Viola (second Junta) was sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment, Armando Lambruschini (second Junta) to 8 years and Orlando Ramón Agosti (first Junta) to 4 years. Omar Graffigna (second Junta), Leopoldo Galtieri, Jorge Isaac Anaya et Basilio Lami Dozo (third Junta) were acquitted for lack of evidence. This trial is the first in South-America where former dictators were brought before judges by a democratic government. On 29 December 1990, Argentinean President Carlos Menen published Decree 2741/90 pardoning the accused sentenced during the 1985 trial. -
La Última Dictadura, Los Usos Del Pasado Y La Construcción De Narrativas Autolegitimantes (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980)
Quinto Sol ISSN: 0329-2665 ISSN: 1851-2879 [email protected] Universidad Nacional de La Pampa Argentina Monumentos, marcas y homenajes: la última dictadura, los usos del pasado y la construcción de narrativas autolegitimantes (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980) Schenquer, Laura; Cañada, Lucía Monumentos, marcas y homenajes: la última dictadura, los usos del pasado y la construcción de narrativas autolegitimantes (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980) Quinto Sol, vol. 24, núm. 2, 2020 Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Argentina Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=23163487005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19137/qs.v24i2.3797 Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. PDF generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por Redalyc Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Laura Schenquer, et al. Monumentos, marcas y homenajes: la última dictadura, los usos del pasado ... Artículos Monumentos, marcas y homenajes: la última dictadura, los usos del pasado y la construcción de narrativas autolegitimantes (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980) Monuments, marks and tributes: the last dictatorship, the uses of the past and the construction of self-legitimating narratives (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980) Monumentos, marcas e homenagens: a última ditadura, os usos do passado e a construção de narrativas autolegitimáveis (Buenos Aires, 1979-1980) Laura Schenquer DOI: https://doi.org/10.19137/qs.v24i2.3797 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? Argentina id=23163487005 Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Argentina [email protected] Lucía Cañada Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina [email protected] Recepción: 15 Abril 2019 Aprobación: 02 Julio 2019 Resumen: La pregunta por el control represivo y por la conquista del consenso social viene inquietando a los estudiosos de los regímenes fascistas y autoritarios. -
Brasil, Argentina E a Questão Cubana (1959-1964): Quando a Independência Faz a União
9 BRASIL, ARGENTINA E A QUESTÃO CUBANA (1959-1964): QUANDO A INDEPENDÊNCIA FAZ A UNIÃO BRASIL, ARGENTINA AND THE CUBAN QUESTION (1959-1964): WHEN THE INDEPENDENCE CLAIMS THE UNION 1 LEONARDO DA ROCHA BOTEGA Recebido em: 17/06/2009 Aprovado em: 29/03/2011 RESUMO ABSTRACT O momento histórico em que Brasil e Argentina The historical moment in which Brazil and Argenti- vivenciaram, ao mesmo tempo, a experiência das na passed through, at the same time, the experience políticas externas independentes dos governos do of independent external politics of the Argentine presidente argentino Arturo Frondizi (1958-1962) e President Arturo Frondizi (1958-1962), and the dos presidentes brasileiros Jânio Quadros e João Brazilian Presidents, Jânio Quadros and João Goulart Goulart (1961-1964) constitui-se de um momento (1961-1964), has established a decisive time for the único nas relações internacionais entre esses dois international relations between these countries. países. Naquela conjuntura, foram pontos comuns o Through the circumstances of that time, common princípio de autodeterminação dos povos e de não- points were the principle of auto-determination of intervenção, o desenvolvimentismo, a universa- the peoples and non-interference, the national lização das relações comerciais, a crítica à deteriora- developmentism, the international trade relations, ção dos termos de troca, o desejo de industrialização the discussion about the exchange rate growing e a busca da integração latino-americana. Assim, as worse, the hankering for industrialization, and the políticas externas independentes constituíram o prin- being sought after Latin America integration. So, the cipal pilar de aproximação entre Brasil e Argentina, independent external politics stood as the main base e as suas políticas externas independentes tiveram for getting both of these countries nearer. -
A Concepção Histórica De Rogelio Frigerio
Revista de Teoria da História Ano 4, Número 8, Dez/2012 Universidade Federal de Goiás ISSN: 2175-5892 A CONCEPÇÃO HISTÓRICA DE ROGELIO FRIGERIO Leonardo da Rocha Botega 1 CAFW/UFSM E-mail: [email protected] RESUMO O presente artigo propõe uma análise das concepções de um dos principais intelectuais do movimento desarrollista na Argentina, Rogelio Frigerio. O projeto desarrollista , o desenvolvimentismo argentino, que buscava a intensificação da industrialização argentina, visando à superação do subdesenvolvimento, foi colocado em prática durante o governo Arturo Frondizi (1958-1962), onde Frigerio cumpriu importante função, primeiramente como Secretário de Assuntos Econômicos e Sociais, depois, como organizador do grupo informal que definia as estratégias do governo, a USINA. Aqui buscasse destacar a influência da dialética hegeliana nas formulações de Frigeiro, sobretudo, na sua busca por demonstrar o caráter cientifico das concepções desarrollistas. Palavras-chave: Rogelio Frigerio, desarrollismo, dialética hegeliana, governo Arturo Frondizi, método histórico. ABSTRACT This article proposes an analysis of the conceptions of a major intellectual in desarrollista movement in Argentina, Rogelio Frigerio. The desarrollista project, the argentine developmentalism, who sought intensified argentine industrialization, aimed at overcoming underdevelopment, was put into practice during the Arturo Frondizi government (1958-1962), where Frigerioe played an important role, first as Secretary of Economic Affairs and social, later, as an organizer of the informal group that defined the strategies of government, the USINA. Here sought to highlight the influence of Hegelian dialectics in Frigeiro’s formulations, especially in his quest to demonstrate the character of scientific desarrollistas conceptions. Keywords: Rogelio Frigerio, desarrollismo, Hegelian dialectic, Arturo Frondizi government, historical method. -
The Voices of the Disappeared: Politicide in Argentina and Chile
THE VOICES OF THE DISAPPEARED: POLITICIDE IN ARGENTINA AND CHILE A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors by Evin Hessel December, 2019 i ii ii Thesis written by Evin Hessel Approved by _____________________________________________________________________, Advisor ________________________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Accepted by ___________________________________________________, Dean, Honors College ii iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………...…….....iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………………….vi CHAPTERS I. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………...………1 i. Chile……………………………………………………...………..2 ii. Argentina…………………………………………………………..6 iii. Genocide or Politicide?..................................................................10 iv. Morality…………………………………………………………..12 II. THE ABDUCTED………………………………………………………….…....16 i. Secret Detention Centers……………………..…………….…….19 III. TORTURE……………………………………………………………………….24 i. Medical Involvement…………………………………………….28 ii. Anti-Semitism…………………………………………...……….30 IV. EXECUTION ……………………………………………………………………32 V. DISPOSAL………………………………………………………………………39 i. Mass Graves……………………………………………………...41 ii. Death Flights……………………………………………………..44 iii. Other Methods…………………………………………...………45 VI. THE AFTERMATH……………………………………………………………..48 i. The Fall of Pinochet……………………………………………..48 ii. Videla Steps Down………………………………………………51 iii. Excavations………………………………………………………53 VII. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………..56 i. Politicide -
In Argentina: Antisemitism, Exclusion, and the Formation of Argentine Nationalism and Identity in the 20Th Century and During Military Rule (1976-1983)
Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2021 The Jewish “Other” in Argentina: Antisemitism, Exclusion, and the Formation of Argentine Nationalism and Identity in the 20th Century and during Military Rule (1976-1983) Marcus Helble Bowdoin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, and the Latin American History Commons Recommended Citation Helble, Marcus, "The Jewish “Other” in Argentina: Antisemitism, Exclusion, and the Formation of Argentine Nationalism and Identity in the 20th Century and during Military Rule (1976-1983)" (2021). Honors Projects. 235. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/235 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Jewish “Other” in Argentina: Antisemitism, Exclusion, and the Formation of Argentine Nationalism and Identity in the 20th Century and during Military Rule (1976-1983) An Honors Paper for the Department of History By Marcus Helble Bowdoin College, 2021 ©2021 Marcus Helble Dedication To my parents, Rebecca and Joseph. Thank you for always supporting me in all my academic pursuits. And to my grandfather. Your life experiences sparked my interest in Jewish history and immigration. Thank you -
The Argentine-Brazilian Nuclear Rapprochement
Julio C. Carasales THE ARGENTINE-BRAZILIAN NUCLEAR RAPPROCHEMENT by Julio C. Carasales1 Ambassador Carasales is a career Ambassador of the Argentine Foreign Service and has held numerous positions, including Deputy Permanent Delegate to the United Nations and the Security Council (1971-73), Under-Secretary of Foreign Affairs (1973-74), Permanent Delegate of Argentina to the Organization of American States (1975-79) and to the Conference on Disarmament (1981-85), and Head of the Foreign Service Institute (1979-81). He has also taught at several universities in Argentina. The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Argentine Foreign Ministry. n the nuclear field, Argentina portant to analysts elsewhere in the among which must be included: and Brazil are the most advanced world attempting to develop work- favorable national political circum- Icountries not only of South able techniques for settling bilateral stances, economic difficulties, simi- America but of the whole of Latin nuclear rivalries. While the Argen- larity of positions regarding the America. This fact, combined with tine-Brazilian “model” is not likely global nonproliferation regime, the the overall influence of the two na- to be directly applicable elsewhere, advent of civilian governments, posi- tions in this region, explains why the process of its negotiation teaches tive presidential leadership, the their nuclear policies are of such im- some valuable lessons regarding the active role of the foreign ministries, portance to the international com- settlement of contentious bilateral as well as forceful international pres- munity. Their nuclear rivalry was nuclear and technical disputes. -
Latin America N News in Brief
Member Inter American Inter • American Newt Press Association ' . • fer English • Speaking peeple For Liberty, Culture and Daily Hemispheric Solidarity The AMEriiasFor a better understanding between the Americas stb YEAR MIAMI SPRINGS, FLA., TUESDAY, ]MARCH 4,1»58 NUMBER 203 • A SAN ROMAN Jj. 0. SMITH S SMITH President vVm President Vice President FRANCISCO AGUUMU CIRRI Salvador HORACIO AC El and Flee President end Publishes Flee President editor and Mnnnaer Latin Disarmament Plan Antonio Rnls Army Eight lllseo Rlern-GAmex Cuban Reports Manarinr Rdttor Advt A Clre Mir. Finds Strong Opposition Honduras United PubUstaeo dallr except Monts? entered as second class natter at the Pott Office of Miami Spriest Fin. on Fsbrnar? t use. to Fight Reds in Rebels Killed, Ammunition EDITORIAL in Diplomatic Circles WASHINGTON, Mar. 3. (UP). fng has provoked great opposition Dr. Luis Quintanilla, Mexican Am- in extremist-nationalist and com- Arms, FOR THE SAKE OF HEMISPHERIC POLITICS, Central America Captured Organization Oriente to of in bassador the munist circles in Latin America. (OAS), American States has taken Quintanilla declared to the COLONIA DEL REFUGIO, El prevent only PRESIDENT ELECT FRONDIZI SHOULD TOUR the initiative in efforts to United Press that he invited Salvador, March 3, (UP). Jose Terrorism, Arson, Reported From debate in the organization of a the diplomats for “a cordial ex- Maria Lemus and Ram6n Villeda Europeans Offer change Costa Rican plan for Latin Amer- of views, some cocktails”, Morales, AMERICAN DEMOCRACIES learned Presidents of El Salvador Several of Island Republic ican disarmament, it was without any special relation with and Honduras, respectively, agreed Parts here. -
24 De Marzo De 1976 (II) Los Dos Significados Del Golpe Revista Realidad Económica Bs.As
Articulo 178 Bis 24 de marzo de 1976 (II) Los dos significados del golpe http://www.iade.org.ar Revista Realidad Económica Bs.As. (Arg) núm. 178 febrero-marzo de 2001 Martín Granovsky* Ninguna fecha como el 24 de marzo de 2001 encierra, al mismo tiempo, dos significados tan fuertes. Se cumplen 25 años de cuando comenzó el proyecto más exitoso para disciplinar -como lo definió brillantemente Adolfo Canitrot- a los sectores sociales argentinos que debían adaptarse al crecimiento del sector financiero. Y hoy, 25 años después, como sucede en cada aniversario del golpe de estado de 1976, las chances de impunidad de los jefes militares de la dictadura se achican en proporción inversa a la fuerza social del reclamo en favor de la reconstrucción de la memoria colectiva. Pero más allá de ambas certezas, ¿el golpe fue el momento más alto en la articulación del partido militar? ¿O fue una etapa en la utilización de las Fuerzas Armadas por parte de la franja aristocrática que podría encarnarse en José Alfredo Martínez de Hoz? Hay interpretaciones a mano para contestar sí o no alternativamente a cualquiera de las dos preguntas. Sin embargo, la respuesta que aquí se propone es un sí y otro sí. Un libro reciente, la biografía de Jorge Videla escrita por María Seoane y Vicente Muleiro, cuenta con detalles la preparación empresaria del golpe a cargo de lo que se llamó el Grupo Perriaux. Se trataba de un equipo de conspiradores al mando de Jaime Perriaux, un mediocre discípulo argentino del filósofo español José Ortega y Gasset y a la vez parte del grupo de propietarios o miembros de directorios de grandes empresas que en esos últimos años habían nutrido, sobre todo, los gabinetes de José María Guido y de Juan Carlos Onganía, Roberto Marcelo Levingston y Alejandro Agustín Lanusse. -
El Ministerio De Bienestar Social Entre El Onganiato Y La Última Dictadura (1966-1983)
El Ministerio de Bienestar Social entre el onganiato y la última dictadura (1966-1983). Análisis de la estrategia de intervención social del Estado en la historia argentina reciente The Ministry of Social Welfare Between Ongania’s Term and the Last Dictatorship (1966-1983). Analysis of the State social intervention strategy in the recent Argentine history Florencia Osuna* Palabras clave Resumen Política social Este artículo reconstruye las estrategias de intervención del Ministerio de Bienestar Social/Acción Social, desde su Dictaduras creación en 1966, durante el régimen de facto presidido argentinas por Juan Carlos Onganía, hasta el fi nal de la última dicta- dura argentina, en 1983. En relación con esto, por un lado, Ministerio de analiza las trayectorias, los discursos y los idearios de los Bienestar Social funcionarios involucrados con las políticas del área. Por otro lado, da cuenta de los principales proyectos ministeriales Tercer peronismo de los diferentes gobiernos del período y las características de las políticas impulsadas e implementadas. El enfoque Católicos diacrónico que adopta el trabajo busca evidenciar los cam- bios y las continuidades en los actores, los discursos y las prácticas de esta agencia estatal en esos complejos años de la historia argentina reciente. De esta manera, intenta demostrar que este ministerio fue un espacio utilizado por diversos actores para proyectar distintas utopías sobre el orden social deseable. * Instituto del Desarrollo Humano (IDH), Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento (UNGS)- CONICET. Contacto: fl [email protected] Estudios Sociales del Estado - volumen 3, número 6, pp. 41 a 65, segundo semestre de 2017 - ISSN: 2422-7803 41 Florencia Osuna Keywords Abstract Social Policies This article rebuilds the intervention strategies by the Ministry of Social Welfare/Social Action since its creation Argentine in 1966 during the de facto regime presided over by Carlos Dictatorships Ongania until the fi nal part of the last dictatorship in Argentina in 1983. -
Young Che.Pdf
r U E Y O U N G C H E Maxence Van der Meersch (1907-51); French author and lawyer, a humanist who wrote about the humble people of the northern region of his birth. Was awarded the Grand Prix de l'Acad6mie Frangaise in 1943 for Corps et dines [Bodies and Souls], his novel about the world of medicine, which became an international success and was translated into thirteen languages. Mario Dalmau and Dario Lopez: Cuban guerrillas who participated in the attack on the Moncada Barracks and were exiled in Mexico. Ricardo Gutierrez (1936-96): Argentine poet and doctor. He wrote The Book of Tears and The Book of Song. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939): Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist who co-founded the psychoanalytic school of psychology. He also made a long-lasting impact on many diverse fields, such as literature, film, Marxist and feminine theories, literary criticism, philosophy and psychology. Nonetheless, some of his theories remain widely disputed. Panait Istrati (1884-1935): left-wing Romanian author who wrote both in Romanian and French. He was horn in Braila and died of tuberculosis at the Filaret Sanatorium in Bucharest. Jorge Ricardo Masetti (1929-64): Argentine journalist who was the first Latin American to interview Fidel Castro in the Sierra Maestra. Founder and first director of the agency Prensa Latina. Close friend of Che Guevara. Led an ' insurrection in northern Argentina. Fell in comhat on 21 April 1964 in the mountains of Salta, Argentina. His noni de ^ guerre was Comandante Segundo. 338 Chronology Entries in italics signify national and international events. -
La Unión Industrial Argentina Y El Gobierno De Illia. Los Sectores Civiles Y El Golpe De Estado De 1966 María Cecilia Míguez H-Industri@, Año 9, Nro
La Unión Industrial Argentina y el gobierno de Illia. Los sectores civiles y el golpe de estado de 1966 María Cecilia Míguez H-industri@, Año 9, Nro. 17, Segundo semestre 2015. ISSN 1851-703X http://ojs.econ.uba.ar/ojs/index.php/H-ind/ La Unión Industrial Argentina y el gobierno de Illia. Los sectores civiles y el golpe de estado de 1966 The Unión Industrial Argentina and Illia´s Goverment. The Dominant Sectors and the Coup d'etat in 1966 María Cecilia Míguez i [email protected] Resumen Este artículo desarrolla la hipótesis de que una de las dos corporaciones de los sectores dominantes más rele- vantes de la historia y la economía argentina, la Unión Industrial Argentina (UIA), y la Acción Coordinadora de Instituciones Empresarias Libres (ACIEL) contribuyeron a crear un clima destituyente a partir de sus críti- cas y presiones constantes. La vinculación de sus propuestas y de las políticas efectivamente aplicadas a partir de la dictadura militar de Juan Carlos Onganía da cuenta de lo que constituye un entramado de complicidad cívico-militar que posibilitó y facilitó el derrocamiento del presidente. Palabras clave: CORPORACIONES ECONÓMICAS- GOLPE DE ESTADO- GOBIERNO DE ILLIA- COMPLICIDAD CÍVICO-MILITAR Abstract This article develops the hypothesis that, the Unión Industrial Argentina (UIA)-one of the most notable cor- porations in the argentinian economic history-, and the Acción Coordinadora de Instituciones Empresarias Libres (ACIEL) helped to create a climate of dismissal. The linking of their proposals and policies effectively applied from the military dictatorship Juan Carlos Onganía is a proof of the existence of a relationship be- tween economic power and military that made possible the overthrow of the president.