Endangered, Extinct (Or Extirpated), and Exotic Species of Texas
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revision of Karst Species Zones for the Austin, Texas, Area
FINAL REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. E - 52 Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation REVISION OF KARST SPECIES ZONES FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS, AREA Prepared by: George Veni Robert Cook Executive Director Matt Wagner Mike Berger Program Director, Wildlife Diversity Division Director, Wildlife 3 October 2006 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___E - 52____________ GRANT TITLE: Revision of Karst Species Zones for the Austin, Texas Area REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 September 2004 to 31 August 2006 OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate and redraw, as necessary and in a GIS, all four karst zones within the twenty-two 7.5’ topographic quadrangle area as defined by Veni and Associates (1992). SEGMENT OBJECTIVE: 1. Re-evaluate and re-draw, as necessary and into a Geographic Information System (GIS), all four karzt zones within the twenty-two 7.5’ topographic quadrangle area as defined by Veni and Associates (1992) within six (6) months of contract award date. SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION: None. SUMMARY OF PROGRESS: Please see Attachment A. LOCATION: Austin Area, Texas. PREPARED BY: ___Craig Farquhar______ DATE: October 3, 2006 APPROVED BY: _____________________ DATE: October 10, 2006 Neil (Nick) E. Carter Federal Aid Coordinator 2 George Veni & Associates Hydrogeologists and Biologists Environmental Management Consulting Cave and Karst Specialists REVISION OF KARST SPECIES ZONES FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS, AREA by George Veni, Ph.D., and Cecilio Martinez prepared for: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 -
Petition to Delist the Bone Cave Harvestman (Texella Reyesi) in Accordance with Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
Petition to delist the Bone Cave harvestman (Texella reyesi) in accordance with Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 PETITION TO DELIST THE BONE CAVE HARVESTMAN (TEXELLA REYESI) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 Petitioned By: John F. Yearwood Kathryn Heidemann Charles & Cheryl Shell Walter Sidney Shell Management Trust American Stewards of Liberty Steven W. Carothers June 02, 2014 This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The federally endangered Bone Cave harvestman (Texella reyesi) is a terrestrial karst invertebrate that occurs in caves and voids north of the Colorado River in Travis and Williamson counties, Texas. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed T. reyesi as endangered in 1988 on the basis of only five to six known localities that occurred in a rapidly developing area. Little was known about the species at the time, but the USFWS deemed listing was warranted to respond to immediate development threats. The current body of information on T. reyesi documents a much broader range of known localities than known at the time of listing and resilience to the human activities that USFWS deemed to be threats to the species. Status of the Species • An increase in known localities from five or six at the time of listing to 172 today. • Significant conservation is in place with at least 94 known localities (55 percent of the total known localities) currently protected in preserves, parks, or other open spaces. • Regulatory protections are afforded to most caves in Travis and Williamson counties via state laws and regulations and local ordinances. -
Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy
Endangered Karst Invertebrate Taxonomy of Central Texas U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 Original date: July 28, 2011 Revised on: April 4, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATE TAXONOMY ................................................. 1 2.1 Batrisodes texanus (Coffin Cave mold beetle) ......................................................................... 2 2.2 Batrisodes venyivi (Helotes mold beetle) .................................................................................. 3 2.3 Cicurina baronia (Robber Baron Cave meshweaver) ............................................................... 4 2.4 Cicurina madla (Madla Cave meshweaver) .............................................................................. 5 2.5 Cicurina venii (Braken Bat Cave meshweaver) ........................................................................ 6 2.6 Cicurina vespera (Government Canyon Bat Cave meshweaver) ............................................. 7 2.7 Neoleptoneta microps (Government Canyon Bat Cave spider) ................................................ 8 2.8 Neoleptoneta myopica (Tooth Cave spider) .............................................................................. 9 2.9 Rhadine exilis (no common name) ......................................................................................... -
Reprint Covers
TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM Speleological Monographs, Number 7 Studies on the CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA of North America Part V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher and James R. Reddell TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM SPELEOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, NUMBER 7 STUDIES ON THE CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA OF NORTH AMERICA, PART V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher Invertebrate Zoology, Natural Science Research Laboratory Museum of Texas Tech University, 3301 4th Street Lubbock, Texas 79409 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] and James R. Reddell Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin, PRC 176, 10100 Burnet Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] March 2009 TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM and the TEXAS NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78705 Copyright 2009 by the Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin All rights rereserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic storage and retrival systems, except by explict, prior written permission of the publisher Printed in the United States of America Cover, The first troglobitic weevil in North America, Lymantes Illustration by Nadine Dupérré Layout and design by James C. Cokendolpher Printed by the Texas Natural Science Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas PREFACE This is the fifth volume in a series devoted to the cavernicole and endogean fauna of the Americas. Previous volumes have been limited to North and Central America. Most of the species described herein are from Texas and Mexico, but one new troglophilic spider is from Colorado (U.S.A.) and a remarkable new eyeless endogean scorpion is described from Colombia, South America. -
Endangered Karst Invertebrates Recovery
ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATES (TRAVIS AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES, TEXAS) -h I I RECOVERY PLA .S. Fish and Wildlife Service RECOVERY PLAN FOR ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATES IN TRAVIS AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES, TEXAS Prepared by: Lisa O’Donnell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 611 E. 6th Street, Room 407 Austin, Texas 78701 William R. Elliott, Ph.D. 12102 Grimsley Drive Austin, Texas 78750 and Ruth A. Stanford U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 611 E. 6th Street, Room 407 Austin, Texas 78701 Edited by: Alisa Shull U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 611 E. 6th Street, Room 407 Austin, Texas 78701 For: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Approved: Date: N DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Because the potential for complete recovery and delisting is uncertain, the goal of this plan is downlisting. Thus, the estimated costs and date of recovery presented in this plan are for downlisting, not delisting. Plans are published by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. -
What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D
Invasive Species Systematic Review, March 2015 What is the evidence that invasive species are a significant contributor to the decline or loss of threatened species? Philip D. Roberts, Hilda Diaz-Soltero, David J. Hemming, Martin J. Parr, Richard H. Shaw, Nicola Wakefield, Holly J. Wright, Arne B.R. Witt www.cabi.org KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 3 Keywords ................................................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 Objective of the review ............................................................................................................ 7 The primary review question: ....................................................................................... 7 Secondary question 1: ................................................................................................. 7 Secondary question 2: ................................................................................................. 7 Methods -
Mapping Potential Golden-Cheeked Warbler Breeding Habitat Using Remotely Sensed Forest Canopy Cover Data Loomis Partners, Inc
APPENDIX A Mapping Potential Golden-cheeked Warbler Breeding Habitat Using Remotely Sensed Forest Canopy Cover Data Loomis Partners, Inc. (2008) Hays County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Mapping Potential Golden-cheeked Warbler Breeding Habitat Using Remotely Sensed Forest Canopy Cover Data Prepared for: County of Hays 111 E. San Antonio Street San Marcos, Texas 78666 Prepared by: ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3101 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 512/327-1180 FAX: 512/327-4062 LAI Proj. No. 051001 August 12, 2008 Mapping Potential GCW Habitat LAI Proj. No. 051001 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................................1 1.2 GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER...................................................................................................................1 1.3 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE 2001 ...............................................................................................3 2.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................3 2.1 HABITAT MAPPING ...................................................................................................................................3 2.2 PROBABILITY OF OCCUPANCY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................5 -
Biological Resources Documentation
Tier I Site Assessment Main CSJ: 0015-10-062 Form Prepared By: Melissa Cross (CP&Y, Inc.) Date of Evaluation: January 26, 2021 Proposed Letting Date: March 2022 Project not assigned to TxDOT under the NEPA Assignment MOU District(s): Austin County(ies): Travis, Williamson Roadway Name: I-35 Limits From: SH 45N Limits To: US 290E Project Description: The project would add one non-tolled managed lane in each direction, and improve bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along the frontage roads and at east/west crossings. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. 1. No Is the project limited to a maintenance activity exempt from coordination? http://txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/environmental/maintenance-program.html 2. No Has the project previously completed coordination with TPWD? 3. Yes Is the project within range of a state threatened or endangered species or SGCN and suitable habitat is present? *Explain: Suitable habitat for three state listed mussel species, the false spike (Fusconaia mitchelli), Texas fatmucket (Lampsilis bracteata), and Texas fawnsfoot (Truncilla macrodon), occurs within the project area. A presence/ absence survey for mussels was conducted in 2015 with no recorded observations of these species within the project area. Therefore, impacts to these species are not anticipated. The following 7 SGCN species have suitable habitat within the project area and may be impacted by the proposed project: cave myotis bat (Myotis velifer), eastern spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius), Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), Woodhouse's toad (Anaxyrus woodhousii), Texas shiner (Notropis amabilis), tree dodder (Cuscuts axaltata), and Correll's false dragonhead (Physostegia correllii). -
Biological Evaluation Form
Start approx. 1 mi north of RM 620/SH 45 345 feet West of Deerbrook Trail n so am lli is Wi av Tr RD GS RIN 620 SP ³ ± D O O W £183 E ¤ IC SP 2222 ³ ± UV1 2222 ³ ± ¤£183 End @ RM 2222 Project Location Project Location Miles County Boundary ¯ 0 2.5 5 Basemap Source: ESRI Topo, ESRI Streets 620 ³ ± ¤£183 UV360 UV1 ¨¦§35 2222 ³ ± Aerial Map US 183N Existing ROW: 715.99 acres Proposed ROW (for Retention Ponds): 41.61 acres Miles Proposed Easements: 2.37 acres 0 0.5 1 1.5 ¯ Basemap Source: ESRI: Microsoft, 2011 US 183 Photo Log Photos Taken in January, October and December 2014 Photo 1: Typical view of US 183 in the project area, facing south. Photo 2: Typical view of Mopac in the project area, facing north. Page 1 US 183 Photo Log Photos Taken in January, October and December 2014 Photo 3: Lake Creek is intermittent and has been highly disturbed in the project area. Facing west at US 183. Photo 4: Shoal Creek and its riparian area, facing west from the Mopac ROW. Page 2 US 183 Photo Log Photos Taken in January, October and December 2014 Photo 5: Riparian area surrounding Shoal Creek within the US 183 ROW, facing east. Photo 6: Potential wetland located in proposed water retention pond, facing north. Page 3 Occurrence List for Quads Surrounding Request Area Occurrence State Federal Scientific Name: Common Name: Number: Status: Status: Eo Id: Argythamnia aphoroides Hill Country wild-mercury 14 1107 Bat Roost 7 3394 Bat Roost 44 3195 Batrisodes texanus Coffin Cave Mold Beetle 2 LE 2441 Batrisodes texanus Coffin Cave Mold Beetle 5 LE 8759 Berberis swaseyi Texas Barberry 6 8715 Berberis swaseyi Texas Barberry 11 11296 Berberis swaseyi Texas Barberry 18 11306 Berberis swaseyi Texas Barberry 24 11304 Berberis swaseyi Texas Barberry 29 11352 Brickellia dentata Leafy Brickellbush 7 8712 Brickellia eupatorioides var. -
WTCPUA Habitat Conservation Plan
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE WEST TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCY RAW WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN Travis County, Texas February 2018 Submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 On Behalf of: West Travis County Public Utility Agency 12117 Bee Cave Road, Bldg. 3, Ste. 120 Bee Cave, Texas 78738 By: aci consulting 1001 Mopac Circle Austin, Texas 78746 aci Project No.: 27-14-081 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Proposed Project, Plan Area, Permit Area, and Covered Activities ......................... 2 2.1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Plan Area ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Permit Area .................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Description of Covered Activities ............................................................................... 7 3.0 Species Addressed by the Habitat Conservation Plan ............................................... 9 3.1 Covered Species - Golden-cheeked Warbler ........................................................... 13 3.2 Other Federally Listed Species in Travis County .................................................. -
Tier I Site Assessment Form
Tier I Site Assessment Main CSJ: 0113-13-168 Form Prepared By: Chelsea Miller (CP&Y, Inc.) Date of Evaluation: February 24, 2020 Proposed Letting Date: November 2022 Project not assigned to TxDOT under the NEPA Assignment MOU District(s): Austin County(ies): Travis Roadway Name: State Loop 360 Limits From: Lake Austin Limits To: North of RM 2222 Project Description: TxDOT Austin District proposes to improve a portion of State Loop 360 from Lake Austin to north of RM 2222 in Austin, Travis County, Texas. The proposed project includes improvements to the intersection at SL 360 at Courtyard Drive by removing the signal on the mainlanes and replacing it with an underpass. The project would also construct a diverging diamond intersection at RM 2222. Bicycle/pedestrian accommodations will also be provided. The project is 0.86 miles in length and the project area is 67.2 acres in size. No easements are proposed for the project. No new ROW is required for the project. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. 1. No Is the project limited to a maintenance activity exempt from coordination? http://txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/environmental/maintenance-program.html 2. No Has the project previously completed coordination with TPWD? 3. Yes Is the project within range of a state threatened or endangered species or SGCN and suitable habitat is present? *Explain: Suitable habitat for the Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia - E), bracted twistflower (Streptanthus bracteatus - T), and Timber Rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus - T) was observed within the project area. -
Potential for Impacts to Endangered Karst Invertebrates from the Proposed 183 North Mobility Project, Travis and Williamson Counties, Texas
TECHNICAL REPORT Potential for Impacts to Endangered Karst Invertebrates from the Proposed 183 North Mobility Project, Travis and Williamson Counties, Texas Prepared for CP&Y, Inc. Prepared by Cambrian Environmental with SWCA Environmental Consultants SWCA Project No. 25572 September 9, 2015 This page left intentionally blank TECHNICAL REPORT OF THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS TO ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATES FROM THE PROPOSED 183 NORTH MOBILITY PROJECT, TRAVIS AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES, TEXAS Prepared for CP&Y, Inc. The Chase Bank Building Tower of the Hills 13809 Research Blvd, No. 300 Austin, Texas 78750 Attn: Andy Atlas Prepared by CAMBRIAN ENVIRONMENTAL 4422 Pack Saddle Pass No. 204 Austin, Texas 78745 with SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 4407 Monterey Oaks Blvd No. 110 Austin, Texas 78749 September 9, 2015 This page left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Ecological Significance of Karst Invertebrates ......................................................................................... 3 Origin of Karst Invertebrate Habitat in the Project Area .......................................................................... 7 Environmental Baseline ............................................................................................................................ 8 Potential for Endangered Karst Invertebrates to Occur In the Project Area ..........................................