DOCSLIB.ORG

WTCPUA Habitat Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WTCPUA Habitat Conservation Plan HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE WEST TRAVIS COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY AGENCY RAW WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN Travis County, Texas February 2018 Submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 On Behalf of: West Travis County Public Utility Agency 12117 Bee Cave Road, Bldg. 3, Ste. 120 Bee Cave, Texas 78738 By: aci consulting 1001 Mopac Circle Austin, Texas 78746 aci Project No.: 27-14-081 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Proposed Project, Plan Area, Permit Area, and Covered Activities ......................... 2 2.1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Plan Area ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Permit Area .................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Description of Covered Activities ............................................................................... 7 3.0 Species Addressed by the Habitat Conservation Plan ............................................... 9 3.1 Covered Species - Golden-cheeked Warbler ........................................................... 13 3.2 Other Federally Listed Species in Travis County ................................................... 14 4.0 Take Assessment ............................................................................................................ 27 4.1 Take Rationale.............................................................................................................. 27 4.2 Effects on Covered Species ........................................................................................ 28 5.0 Conservation Program .................................................................................................. 29 5.1 Biological Goals and Objectives ................................................................................ 29 5.2 Minimization, Avoidance, and Mitigation Measures ............................................ 30 5.3 Changed Circumstances and Unforeseen Circumstances ..................................... 31 5.4 Adaptive Management ............................................................................................... 33 5.5 Additional Conservation Measures .......................................................................... 34 5.6 Reporting ...................................................................................................................... 34 6.0 Permit Duration.............................................................................................................. 35 7.0 Funding Plan .................................................................................................................. 35 8.0 Alternatives Analysis .................................................................................................... 36 8.1 Proposed Project (Alternative 1) Effects .................................................................. 37 8.2 Alternative 2 Effects .................................................................................................... 37 8.3 Alternative 3 Effects .................................................................................................... 38 8.4 Alternative 4 Effects .................................................................................................... 39 8.5 No-Build Alternative .................................................................................................. 41 9.0 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 42 10.0 References ....................................................................................................................... 44 WTCPUA Raw Water Transmission Main i February 2018 Habitat Conservation Plan aci Project No.: 27-14-081 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Impact types within the GCWA preserve ................................................................. 6 Table 2: Impacts within Preserve, Macrosite and GCWA Occupied Habitat ..................... 9 Table 3: Candidate, Threatened, and Endangered Species of Potential Occurrence in Travis County ............................................................................................................................. 12 Table 4: Acreage within Preserve, Macrosite and GCWA Occupied Habitat by Alternative .................................................................................................................................. 36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Plan Area Figure 2: South Lake Austin Macrosite of the BCP Figure 3: Proposed Raw Water Lines Figure 4: Permit Area Figure 5: GCWA Habitat (SWCA 1993) Figure 6: aci GCWA Habitat Figure 7: Direct Impact Areas Figure 8: Total Impact Area Figure 9: Veni and Associates Karst Zones Figure 10: Alternative 2 Impacts Figure 11: Alternative 3 Impacts Figure 12: Alternative 4 Impacts LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Lake Pointe Incidental Take Permit No: PRT-782186 issued February 15, 1994 Appendix B: Lake Pointe IV Incidental Take Permit No: PRT-817371 issued December 18, 1996 Appendix C: Balcones Canyonlands Preserve, Land Management Plan, Tier II-C, South Lake Austin Macrosite Appendix D: Lake Pointe Environmental Assessment Appendix E: Lake Pointe Habitat Conservation Plan Appendix F: aci consulting Habitat Assessment Appendix G: USFWS SW Parkway 20-inch Transmission Main Correspondence WTCPUA Raw Water Transmission Main ii February 2018 Habitat Conservation Plan aci Project No.: 27-14-081 Appendix H: Memorandum of Understanding Between U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and The Lower Colorado River Authority for The Purpose of Providing Surface Water for Residents in Western Travis and Northern Hays Counties WTCPUA Raw Water Transmission Main iii February 2018 Habitat Conservation Plan aci Project No.: 27-14-081 Executive Summary The West Travis County Public Utility Agency (WTCPUA) is requesting an Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit for impacts associated with construction of the WTCPUA Raw Water Transmission Main to a federally listed endangered species, golden-cheeked warbler (Setophaga chrysoparia) (GCWA). The Section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit will authorize the construction, operation, and maintenance of a new raw water transmission main within areas established as GCWA preserve and occupied habitat. Additionally, WTCPUA is requesting incidental take authorization for the operation and maintenance of an existing raw water line, along with an existing raw water intake facility, electric powerlines, and access road. This document serves as the Habitat Conservation Plan for the requested authorization. The proposed project is near the Lake Pointe development in Bee Cave, Texas, and would be constructed from an existing pump station on Lake Austin and extend to the existing Uplands Water Treatment Facility at Ranch-to-Market (RM) 2244, approximately 0.3 mile east of the intersection of Texas State Highway 71 and RM 2244 in Bee Cave, Texas. The proposed project will be partially located within an existing preserve for golden-cheeked warbler that mitigated the effects of the Lake Pointe Development permitted under a prior Section (a)(1)(B) incidental take permit. The proposed construction of the raw water transmission main (raw water line) is to supplement and provide redundancy to an existing raw water line via parallel capacity to an existing water line that connects the pump station with the water treatment facility. The existing water line is over 30 years old and was constructed and operational prior to the federal listing of the golden-cheeked warbler as endangered. In early October 2015, the existing line ruptured causing the entire WTCPUA service area to enter emergency Stage 4 water restrictions while the failure was being repaired. During the repair process, approximately 0.1 acre of Ashe juniper vegetation, which was identified as non-habitat for the GCWA in the previous Lake Pointe Section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit, was removed. This clearing activity was conducted outside of the breeding season and in an area that is not GCWA habitat; therefore, it is unlikely this clearing had any effect on the GCWA. U.S. Fish and Wildlife was notified of the line failure and repair. USFWS requested that the clearing and future maintenance of the existing water line be included in the current habitat conservation WTCPUA Raw Water Transmission Main iv February 2018 Habitat Conservation Plan aci Project No.: 27-14-081 plan. The incidental take of GCWA associated with the operation and maintenance of the existing water line, along with the raw water intake facility, electric powerlines, and access road, was previously allowed for under the implementing agreement associated with an Incidental Take Permit for the Lake Pointe Development, which expired in 2009. The WTCPUA will include the future operation and maintenance of the existing line into this habitat conservation plan to extend the duration of incidental take coverage resulting from those activities. The proposed WTCPUA raw water line will be constructed to provide redundancy and is part of an approved 10-year Capital
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRA Evaluation Charter No. 16626
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE May 4, 2016 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Central National Bank Charter Number 16626 8320 W. Highway 84, Waco, TX 76712 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 225 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 900, Irving, Texas 75062 NOTE: This document is an evaluation of this institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods consistent with safe and sound operation of the institution. This evaluation is not, nor should it be construed as, an assessment of the financial condition of this institution. The rating assigned to this institution does not represent an analysis, conclusion, or opinion of the federal financial supervisory agency concerning the safety and soundness of this financial institution. Charter Number 16626 INSTITUTION'S CRA RATING: This institution is rated Satisfactory. The Lending Test is rated: Satisfactory. The Community Development Test is rated: Outstanding. Major factors that support this Satisfactory rating include: • The bank’s loan-to-deposit (LTD) ratio is reasonable. • A majority of loan originations and purchases are within the bank’s assessment area (AA). • The distribution of residential and business loans to borrowers of different income levels exhibits reasonable penetration. • The bank’s geographic distribution of residential and business loans to low- and moderate-income (LMI) census tracts reflects reasonable dispersion. • The overall level of responsiveness of community development (CD) lending, investments, and services is excellent. 1 Charter Number 16626 Scope of Examination The Performance Evaluation (PE) assesses the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of the communities in which it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collection of Oak Trees of Mexico and Central America in Iturraran Botanical Gardens
    The Collection of Oak Trees of Mexico and Central America in Iturraran Botanical Gardens Francisco Garin Garcia Iturraran Botanical Gardens, northern Spain [email protected] Overview Iturraran Botanical Gardens occupy 25 hectares of the northern area of Spain’s Pagoeta Natural Park. They extend along the slopes of the Iturraran hill upon the former hay meadows belonging to the farmhouse of the same name, currently the Reception Centre of the Park. The minimum altitude is 130 m above sea level, and the maximum is 220 m. Within its bounds there are indigenous wooded copses of Quercus robur and other non-coniferous species. Annual precipitation ranges from 140 to 160 cm/year. The maximum temperatures can reach 30º C on some days of summer and even during periods of southern winds on isolated days from October to March; the winter minimums fall to -3º C or -5 º C, occasionally registering as low as -7º C. Frosty days are few and they do not last long. It may snow several days each year. Soils are fairly shallow, with a calcareous substratum, but acidified by the abundant rainfall. In general, the pH is neutral due to their action. Collections The first plantations date back to late 1987. There are currently approximately 5,000 different taxa, the majority being trees and shrubs. There are around 3,000 species, including around 300 species from the genus Quercus; 100 of them are from Mexico and Central America. Quercus costaricensis photo©Francisco Garcia 48 International Oak Journal No. 22 Spring 2011 Oaks from Mexico and Oaks from Mexico
    [Show full text]
  • City of Austin
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 23, 2019 New Issues: Book-Entry-Only System Ratings: Moody’s: “A1” (stable outlook) S&P: “A” (positive outlook) Kroll: “AA-” (stable outlook) (See “OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION – Ratings”) In the opinion of Bracewell LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i) interest on the 2019A Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and (ii) the 2019A Bonds are not “private activity bonds.” Further, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i) interest on the 2019B Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except for any period during which a 2019B Bond is held by a person who is a “substantial user” of the facilities financed with the proceeds of the 2019B Bonds or a “related person” to such a “substantial user,” each within the meaning of section 147(a) of the Code and (ii) interest on the 2019B Bonds is an item of tax preference that is includable in alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of determining a taxpayer’s alternative minimum tax liability. See “TAX MATTERS” for a discussion of the opinions of Bond Counsel. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS $16,975,000 $248,170,000 Airport System Revenue Bonds, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Series 2019B (AMT) Dated: August 1, 2019; Interest to accrue from Date of Initial Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover page The $16,975,000 City of Austin, Texas Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A (the “2019A Bonds”) and the $248,170,000 City of Austin, Texas Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B (AMT) (the “2019B Bonds” and, collectively with the 2019A Bonds, the “Bonds”), are limited special obligations of the City of Austin, Texas (the “City”), issued pursuant to the ordinances adopted by the City on June 19, 2019 (the “Ordinances”).
    [Show full text]
  • St. Mark's Medical Office Building Two St
    ST. MARK'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING TWO ST. MARK'S PLACE | LA GRANGE, TX 78945 OFFERING MEMORANDUM DISCLAIMER ST. MARK'S MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Colliers International Brokerage Company (“Broker“) has been retained as the exclusive advisor and broker for this offering. TWO ST. MARK'S PLACE This Offering Memorandum has been prepared by Broker for use by a limited number of parties and does not purport to provide a necessarily LA GRANGE, TX 78945 accurate summary of the Property or any of the documents related thereto, nor does it purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information which prospective Buyers may need or desire. All projections have been developed by Broker and designated sources and are based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of the Seller and therefore are subject to variation. No representation is made by Broker or the Seller as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein shall be relied on as a promise or representation as to the future performance of the Property. Although the information contained EXCLUSIVE INVESTMENT ADVISORY TEAM herein is believed to be correct, the Seller and its employees disclaim any responsibility for inaccuracies and expect prospective purchasers to exercise independent due diligence in verifying all such information. Further, Broker, the Seller and its employees disclaim any and all liability for representations and warranties, expressed and implied, contained in or omitted from the Offering Memorandum or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the Buyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Karst Species Zones for the Austin, Texas, Area
    FINAL REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. E - 52 Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation REVISION OF KARST SPECIES ZONES FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS, AREA Prepared by: George Veni Robert Cook Executive Director Matt Wagner Mike Berger Program Director, Wildlife Diversity Division Director, Wildlife 3 October 2006 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___E - 52____________ GRANT TITLE: Revision of Karst Species Zones for the Austin, Texas Area REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 September 2004 to 31 August 2006 OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate and redraw, as necessary and in a GIS, all four karst zones within the twenty-two 7.5’ topographic quadrangle area as defined by Veni and Associates (1992). SEGMENT OBJECTIVE: 1. Re-evaluate and re-draw, as necessary and into a Geographic Information System (GIS), all four karzt zones within the twenty-two 7.5’ topographic quadrangle area as defined by Veni and Associates (1992) within six (6) months of contract award date. SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION: None. SUMMARY OF PROGRESS: Please see Attachment A. LOCATION: Austin Area, Texas. PREPARED BY: ___Craig Farquhar______ DATE: October 3, 2006 APPROVED BY: _____________________ DATE: October 10, 2006 Neil (Nick) E. Carter Federal Aid Coordinator 2 George Veni & Associates Hydrogeologists and Biologists Environmental Management Consulting Cave and Karst Specialists REVISION OF KARST SPECIES ZONES FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS, AREA by George Veni, Ph.D., and Cecilio Martinez prepared for: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    RAFAEL AGUILAR-ROMERO1,4, FELIPE GARCÍA-OLIVA2, FERNANDO PINEDA-GARCÍA1, IGNACIO TORRES2, ERNESTO PEÑA-VEGA2, ADRIÁN GHILARDI3 AND KEN OYAMA1,2 Botanical Sciences 94 (3): 471-482, 2016 Abstract Elucidating the factors determining plant distribution is still on discussion. It has been stated that the distri- DOI: 10.17129/botsci.620 bution is mostly determined by environmental factors, but the evidence on whether this or other processes are the determinants remains inconclusive. In the present study, we hypothesized that oak species differ in their distribution, which might be mostly influence by the environment. Particularly, we explored: i) the patterns of distribution of Quercus species at a landscape scale; ii) the climatic, soil and topographic fac- tors that might determine their distribution, and iii) the degree of association between the species within fragments. The study included the analysis of 78 oak forest fragments at the Cuitzeo lake Basin in Micho- acán state, Mexico in which nine oak species were registered. The species showed clear differences in their distribution; three groups of oak species that differ significantly in their spatial arrangement were detected with a NMDS (Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling) analysis. We observed a relationship between oak species distribution with temperature and precipitation. In particular, Q. candicans, Q. crassipes and Q. rugosa were frequently distributed at sites with higher rainfall and lower temperature; in contrast, Q. deserticola, Q. gentryi and Q. glaucoides were at more arid areas. We found associations between pairs of oak species; the most recurrent one was between species from the Quercus and the Lobatae sections. Overall, the pattern of distribution among oak species was determined by environmental factors, which suggests that they partition their habitat to avoid competition for resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Delist the Bone Cave Harvestman (Texella Reyesi) in Accordance with Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
    Petition to delist the Bone Cave harvestman (Texella reyesi) in accordance with Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 PETITION TO DELIST THE BONE CAVE HARVESTMAN (TEXELLA REYESI) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 Petitioned By: John F. Yearwood Kathryn Heidemann Charles & Cheryl Shell Walter Sidney Shell Management Trust American Stewards of Liberty Steven W. Carothers June 02, 2014 This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The federally endangered Bone Cave harvestman (Texella reyesi) is a terrestrial karst invertebrate that occurs in caves and voids north of the Colorado River in Travis and Williamson counties, Texas. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed T. reyesi as endangered in 1988 on the basis of only five to six known localities that occurred in a rapidly developing area. Little was known about the species at the time, but the USFWS deemed listing was warranted to respond to immediate development threats. The current body of information on T. reyesi documents a much broader range of known localities than known at the time of listing and resilience to the human activities that USFWS deemed to be threats to the species. Status of the Species • An increase in known localities from five or six at the time of listing to 172 today. • Significant conservation is in place with at least 94 known localities (55 percent of the total known localities) currently protected in preserves, parks, or other open spaces. • Regulatory protections are afforded to most caves in Travis and Williamson counties via state laws and regulations and local ordinances.
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy
    Endangered Karst Invertebrate Taxonomy of Central Texas U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 Original date: July 28, 2011 Revised on: April 4, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATE TAXONOMY ................................................. 1 2.1 Batrisodes texanus (Coffin Cave mold beetle) ......................................................................... 2 2.2 Batrisodes venyivi (Helotes mold beetle) .................................................................................. 3 2.3 Cicurina baronia (Robber Baron Cave meshweaver) ............................................................... 4 2.4 Cicurina madla (Madla Cave meshweaver) .............................................................................. 5 2.5 Cicurina venii (Braken Bat Cave meshweaver) ........................................................................ 6 2.6 Cicurina vespera (Government Canyon Bat Cave meshweaver) ............................................. 7 2.7 Neoleptoneta microps (Government Canyon Bat Cave spider) ................................................ 8 2.8 Neoleptoneta myopica (Tooth Cave spider) .............................................................................. 9 2.9 Rhadine exilis (no common name) .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Native and Adapted Plants for KB Home in Boerne
    Recommended Native and Adapted Plants for Boerne Native Plant Society of Texas - Boerne Chapter www.npsot.org/boerne Using native and well-adapted plants to landscape will save time and money. Once established, natives require less water, fertilizer, pesticides, and maintenance than most non-natives. Before buying plants, identify the characteristics of your yard, such as how much morning and afternoon sun or shade you have, available moisture, and drainage. All these will impact plant survival and the plant selections you make. Choose plants that are suited to your site. Use a variety of heights in your design. For example, plant a canopy tree to provide shade. Plant understory (U) trees, shade-loving shrubs, and shade tolerant perennials under existing canopy trees. Not only will your landscape be more appealing, but you will have a better survival rate when you provide some shade for plants that need protection from the blistering Texas sun. Consider leaving any existing native vegetation undisturbed, as these areas will be very low-maintenance, and will help preserve the “Hill Country Heritage” that attracts many people to this area. You may enhance these native areas by adding favorite compatible selections for increased color or wildlife food to attract hummingbirds , butterflies , and songbirds to your yard. In general, avoid acid-living plants as the soil in central Texas is very alkaline. Also, avoid water-requiring plants as the average rainfall in the area is usually only around 30 inches per year. This list includes non-native plants which grow compatibly with drought-tolerant native plants. These are listed because of their hardiness in the Hill Country soil and climate and because of their availability in local nurseries.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Bacteria Associated with the Root Nodules of Hypocalyptus and Related Genera
    Characterisation of bacteria associated with the root nodules of Hypocalyptus and related genera by Chrizelle Winsie Beukes Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa Promoter: Prof. E.T. Steenkamp Co-promoters: Prof. S.N. Venter Dr. I.J. Law August 2011 © University of Pretoria Dedicated to my parents, Hendrik and Lorraine. Thank you for your unwavering support. © University of Pretoria I certify that this dissertation hereby submitted to the University of Pretoria for the degree of Magister Scientiae (Microbiology), has not previously been submitted by me in respect of a degree at any other university. Signature _________________ August 2011 © University of Pretoria Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Preface ii Chapter 1 1 Taxonomy, infection biology and evolution of rhizobia, with special reference to those nodulating Hypocalyptus Chapter 2 80 Diverse beta-rhizobia nodulate legumes in the South African indigenous tribe Hypocalypteae Chapter 3 131 African origins for fynbos associated beta-rhizobia Summary 173 © University of Pretoria Acknowledgements Firstly I want to acknowledge Our Heavenly Father, for granting me the opportunity to obtain this degree and for putting the special people along my way to aid me in achieving it. Then I would like to take the opportunity to thank the following people and institutions: My parents, Hendrik and Lorraine, thank you for your support, understanding and love; Prof. Emma Steenkamp, for her guidance, advice and significant insights throughout this project; My co-supervisors, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • August 21, 2019
    NEW ISSUE: BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY OFFERING MEMORANDUM Ratings: S&P: PSF Enhanced: “AAA”; Underlying: “AA+” August 21, 2019 Ratings: Fitch: PSF Enhanced: “AAA”; Underlying: “AA+” PSF Guarantee: “Conditionally Approved” (See “RATINGS” and “THE PERMANENT SCHOOL FUND GUARANTEE PROGRAM”.) In the opinion of Bond Counsel (identified below), assuming continuing compliance by the District (defined below) after the date of initial delivery of the Bonds (defined below) with certain covenants contained in the Order (defined below) and subject to the matters set forth under “TAX MATTERS” herein, interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations, published rulings, and court decisions (1) is not included in gross income of the owners thereof pursuant to section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date of initial delivery of the Bonds, and (2) is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. Additionally, see “THE BONDS - Determination of Interest Rate; Rate Mode Changes” identifying circumstances when an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel is required as a condition for an interest mode conversion. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion as to the effect on the excludability from gross income for federal income tax purposes of any action requiring such an opinion. $14,930,000 EANES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (A political subdivision of the State of Texas located in Travis County, Texas) VARIABLE RATE UNLIMITED TAX SCHOOL BUILDING BONDS, SERIES 2019B INITIAL TERM RATE PERIOD OF SIX YEARS AT A PER ANNUM INITIAL RATE OF 1.75% (PRICED TO YIELD 1.35% TO FIRST OPTIONAL REDEMPTION DATE OF AUGUST 1, 2024) Dated Date: September 1, 2019 (interest will accrue from the Delivery Date) Mandatory Tender Date: August 1, 2025 CUSIP No.
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Creek Kyle Texas
    Plum Creek Kyle, Texas Project Type: Residential Case No: C036013 Year: 2006 SUMMARY Plum Creek is a master-planned community located in Kyle, Texas, approximately 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Austin. Developed by Benchmark Land Development, it is the first large-scale community in the Austin metropolitan area built according to the principles of new urbanism. At buildout, the 2,200-acre (890-hectare) development will contain up to 8,700 homes, a mixed-use town center, employment districts, and a commuter rail station. FEATURES Master-Planned Community—Large Scale Transit-Oriented Development Pedestrian-Friendly Design Traditional Neighborhood Development Plum Creek Kyle, Texas Project Type: Residential Subcategory: Planned Communities Volume 36 Number 13 July–September 2006 Case Number: C036013 PROJECT TYPE Plum Creek is a master-planned community located in Kyle, Texas, approximately 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Austin. Developed by Benchmark Land Development, it is the first large-scale community in the Austin metropolitan area built according to the principles of new urbanism. At buildout, the 2,200-acre (890-hectare) development will contain up to 8,700 homes, a mixed-use town center, employment districts, and a commuter rail station. LOCATION Outer Suburban SITE SIZE 2,200 acres/890 hectares LAND USES Single-Family Detached Residential, Townhouses, Condominiums, Apartments, Neighborhood Retail Center, Schools, Golf Course, Open Space KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES Master-Planned Community—Large Scale Transit-Oriented Development Pedestrian-Friendly Design Traditional Neighborhood Development PROJECT WEB SITE www.plumcreektx.com DEVELOPER Benchmark Land Development, Inc. Austin, Texas 512-472-7455 www.benchmarktx.net LAND PLANNER TBG Partners, Inc.
    [Show full text]