Ann E. Cudd Sally J. Scholz Editors Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ann E. Cudd Sally J. Scholz Editors Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21St Century Amintaphil: The Philosophical Foundations of Law And Justice Series Editor: Mortimer Sellers Ann E. Cudd Sally J. Scholz Editors Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21st Century AMINTAPHIL Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21st Century AMINTAPHIL The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice Series editor Mortimer Sellers, University of Baltimore Editorial board Leslie P. Francis, University of Utah Carol Gould, Hunter College Steven P. Lee, Hobart and William Smith Colleges Rex Martin, University of Kansas and University of Cardiff Larry May, Washington University in St. Louis Christine T. Sistare, Muhlenberg College For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/7372 Ann E. Cudd • Sally J. Scholz Editors Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21st Century Editors Ann E. Cudd Sally J. Scholz Department of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Kansas Villanova University Lawrence, KS , USA Villanova , PA , USA ISSN 1873-877X ISSN 2351-9851 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-319-02311-3 ISBN 978-3-319-02312-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02312-0 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013955587 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Acknowledgement We would like to acknowledge the support and assistance of several institutions and individuals who made our work on this volume possible, effi cient, and enjoyable. Ann thanks the University of Kansas College of Liberal Arts and Sciences for fi nancial support of her research and travel to the 2012 AMINTAPHIL conference. Sally thanks Villanova University Department of Philosophy for research support. Mortimer Sellers and the University of Baltimore School of Law hosted the 2012 conference and we are grateful for their hospitality. Bruce Landesman has been the Executive Director of AMINTAPHIL for many years and we thank him for his dedication to an organization that has treated us so well over the years. Ashley Acosta-Fox, Ph.D. student at the University of Kansas, assisted us with the copyediting and formatting of the manuscript. We thank her for good sense and attention to detail. Thanks also go to all the participants in the conference. The essays published here refl ect your lively conversations and constructive criticism. Finally, we thank the contributors to this volume, who withstood numerous requests for revisions, responded to queries about copyediting and other details, and did so with effi ciency and good humor. Ann would like to dedicate this volume to Richard DeGeorge and Rex Martin, her colleagues in political philosophy at the University of Kansas for over 25 years, who introduced her to the AMINTAPHIL Society, and Sally would like to dedicate this volume to Bill McBride and Joe Betz, who value and encourage philosophical engagement with the real world. v Contents 1 Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the Twenty-First Century: Introduction ............................................................................ 1 Ann E. Cudd and Sally J. Scholz Part I The Meaning of Democracy 2 Democracy: A Paradox of Rights? ........................................................ 15 Emily R. Gill 3 Rights and the American Constitution: The Issue of Judicial Review and Its Compatibility with Democracy .................................... 29 Rex Martin 4 Democracy as a Social Myth .................................................................. 43 Richard T. De George Part II The Current Polarization 5 Political Polarization and the Markets vs. Government Debate ............. 57 Stephen Nathanson 6 Two Visions of Democracy ..................................................................... 75 Richard Barron Parker 7 Proportional Representation, the Single Transferable Vote, and Electoral Pragmatism ............................................................ 87 Richard Nunan 8 The Problem of Democracy in the Context of Polarization ................ 103 Imer B. Flores vii viii Contents Part III Democracy, Capitalism, and the Infl uence of Big Money 9 Is Justice Possible Under Welfare State Capitalism? .......................... 121 Steven P. Lee 10 Rawls on Inequality, Social Segregation and Democracy ................... 133 Mark Navin 11 Mass Democracy in a Postfactual Market Society: Citizens United and the Role of Corporate Political Speech .............................. 147 F. Patrick Hubbard 12 A Tsunami of Filthy Lucre: How the Decisions of the SCOTUS Imperil American Democracy .................................... 159 Jonathan Schonsheck 13 Democracy and Economic Inequality ................................................... 175 Alistair M. Macleod Part IV Democratic Decisions and the (Un)Informed Public 14 Epistocracy Within Public Reason ........................................................ 191 Jason Brennan 15 Journalists as Purveyors of Partial Truths ........................................... 205 Russell W. Waltz 16 Motivated Reasoning, Group Identifi cation, and Representative Democracy ............................................................. 219 Kenneth Henley 17 Republics, Passions and Protests ........................................................... 229 Wade L. Robison Author Bios ...................................................................................................... 241 Index ................................................................................................................. 245 Chapter 1 Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the Twenty-First Century: Introduction Ann E. Cudd and Sally J. Scholz Abstract Recent global movements, including the Arab Spring, the Occupy Movement, as well as polarizing events in the US, such as the Citizens United ruling, invite a rethinking of the meaning, desirability, and feasibility of democracy in the twenty- fi rst century. Technological changes have increased democratic participation, but have yet to improve democratic deliberation. Ideological differences have engendered incivility and unwillingness to compromise. Philosophical refl ection offers opportunities not only to scrutinize the implications of these changes for democracy but also to reevaluate the nature and meaning of the core concepts of political theory. This chapter interprets the contemporary context of democracy in light of recent developments, and offers an overview of the issues considered in the chapters of this book. Recent global movements invite a rethinking of the meaning, desirability, and feasibility of democracy in the twenty-fi rst century, especially in light of economic or corporate globalization. While the Arab Spring demonstrates the sacrifi ces individuals are willing to make in the struggle for democracy, the Occupy Movement raises the question of who has a voice and access to power in a democracy. All over the world, we see individuals and collectives exerting renewed democratic political power through social media and transnational protest, but simultaneously the power of multinational corporations in domestic politics challenges the very ideal of democratic equality and who counts as a rights holder. Philosophical discussions A. E. Cudd (*) Department of Philosophy , University of Kansas , 1445 Jayhawk Blvd Rm 3090 , 66045 Lawrence , KS , USA e-mail: [email protected] S. J. Scholz Department of Philosophy , Villanova University , 800 Lancaster Ave , 19085-1478 Villanova , PA , USA e-mail: [email protected] A.E. Cudd and S.J. Scholz (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy 1 in the 21st Century, AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice 5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02312-0_1, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 2 A.E. Cudd and S.J. Scholz of the rapidly
Recommended publications
  • Computational Social Choice
    (Computational) Social Choice Michal Jakob Artificial Intelligence Center, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, FEE, Czech Technical University AE4M36MAS Autumn 2018 - Lecture 11 Motivating Example top choice ranking > > > > > > > > > ? > ? > ? > ? > > > > > > OPEN INFORMATICS / MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: SOCIAL CHOICE Social Choice Social choice theory is a theoretical framework for making rational collective decisions based on the preferences of multiple agents. (does not consider payments: settings with payments auctions) OPEN INFORMATICS / MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: SOCIAL CHOICE Wide Range of Applications Elections Joint plans (MAS) Resource allocation Recommendation and reputation systems Human computation (crowdsourcing) Webpage ranking and meta-search engines Discussion forums OPEN INFORMATICS / MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: SOCIAL CHOICE Key Questions What does it mean to make collective rational choices? Which formal properties should such choices satisfy? Which of these properties can be satisfied simultaneously? How difficult is it to compute collective choices? Can voters benefit by lying about their preferences? OPEN INFORMATICS / MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: SOCIAL CHOICE Basic Definitions Social Choice OPEN INFORMATICS / MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS: SOCIAL CHOICE Social Welfare Function Consider ▪ a finite set 푁 = {1, … , 푛} of at least two agents (also called individuals or voters), and ▪ a finite universe 푈 of at least two alternatives (also called candidates). ▪ Each agent 푖 has preferences over the alternatives in 푈, which are represented by a transitive
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons for Emergent Post-Modern Democrats by Ken White
    Extreme Democracy 90 8 The dead hand of modern democracy: Lessons for emergent post-modern democrats By Ken White et us not be too hasty to bury the present; it’s not dead yet, and a pre- mortem might provide some useful information. Those of us moving L ahead ought to remember Santayana’s famous dictum, and meditate— deeply—on what, and whom, we might leave behind. Emergent democracy can augment and, perhaps, even gradually supplant outmoded forms of self-governance, but only if we appreciate why those forms were once “moded”—suited to their times and uses. After all, Democracy 2.0 (if we consider Athens “1.0”) has enjoyed a pretty good 220- year run, even with all its failings. Considering which critical functions of modern democracy deserve preservation in intent, if not in form, offers the opportunity to appreciate the rich complexity of democratic self-governance and its astonishingly diverse modes of participation and action. By attending to what made modern democracy successful we might learn a few lessons; extract some insights from the old model; and identify a few pitfalls we ought to avoid, even as we cheerfully acknowledge the inevitability of creating a new set of pitfalls. I draw on personal experience in arriving at this conclusion. Working in the United States on democratic reforms (including campaign financing) for many years, I came to appreciate the difference between “reform” and “redesign.” Although the former may occur more often in some limited way, the promise of the latter drives truly significant change. As Extreme Democracy 91 Buckminster Fuller said: “You never change things by fighting against the existing reality.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea: Legal and Political Overtones of Defensive Democracy in a Divided Country South Korea Has Already Passed Samuel
    South Korea: Legal and Political Overtones of Defensive Democracy in a Divided Country KWANGSUP KIM South Korea has already passed Samuel Huntington’s two-turnover test for democratic consolidation, which occurred with the peaceful transitions of power in 1992 and 1996. This occurred despite the enduring military tension on the divided Korean peninsula. Huntington said that when a nation transitions from an “emergent democracy” to a “stable democracy,” its ruling parties must undergo two democratic and peaceful turnovers.1 However, there still exists heated controversy over whether the executive power violates democratic rule and human rights in the name of national security. This is despite the fact that the military authoritarian regime perished in 1987 and subsequent civilian governments have accomplished democratic reform. On November 6, 2013, the Ministry of Justice in South Korea petitioned to the Constitutional Court to rule on dissolving the minor Unified Progressive Party (UPP) for violating the “basic rules of democracy.”2 The ministry’s filing comes after the prosecution of indicted lawmaker, Lee Seok-ki of the UPP on September 5, 2013, on charges of conspiracy to stage a rebellion, incitement and sympathizing with North Korea, and infringement of the Kwangsup Kim is a Ph.D. Fellow at Center for Constitutional Democracy of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, an academic director and vice chairperson of the Committee of Women’s Rights at the Human Rights & Welfare Institution of Korea., and a Member of the Board of Directors at The Correction Welfare Society of Korea. 1 Samuel P. Huntington, “The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.” Norman: University of Oklahoma Press 14 (1991): 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethereum Classic Treasury System Proposal
    ETHEREUM CLASSIC TREASURY SYSTEM PROPOSAL RESEARCH REPORT March 7th 2017 The Veritas Team Dmytro Kaidalov, Lyudmila Kovalchuk, Andrii Nastenko, Mariia Rodinko, Oleksiy Shevtsov, Roman Oliynykov IOHK.io Abstract We propose the Ethereum Classic Treasury System (ECTS) whose main purpose is to establish a decentralized funding mechanism for development and maintenance of the Ethereum Classic platform. Anyone can submit a project proposal and the stakeholders will decide on its necessity through a transparent voting procedure. The system is fully verifiable, having no significant influence on ETC performance. The report also takes into account ECIP 1017 that changes Ethereum Classic monetary policy and emission schedule. We expect that the ECTS implementation will increase stability and the outlook of the system, providing additional benefits both for stakeholders and miners from a more stable and predictable system. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Objective and desired properties of the treasury system..........................................4 1.2 Overview of the proposed treasury system......................5 2 Ethereum Classic Treasury System6 2.1 Ethereum Classic Blockchain.............................7 2.2 Basic Treasury Model.................................8 2.2.1 Funding epochs.................................8 2.2.2 Epoch stages..................................9 2.3 Proposal submission.................................. 12 2.3.1 Proposal ballot formation........................... 12 2.3.2 Submission rules and cost........................... 13 2.3.3 Miscellaneous: revocation and money reducing............... 13 2.4 Voters.......................................... 13 2.4.1 Deposit submission and redemption..................... 14 2.4.2 Incentives.................................... 15 2.5 Treasury source.................................... 16 2.5.1 Funding within the ECIP-1017 monetary policy............... 16 2.5.2 Legacy monetary policy............................ 18 2.6 Election method...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel
    Mass Shootings at Virginia Tech April 16, 2007 Report of the Review Panel Presented to Governor Kaine Commonwealth of Virginia AUGUST 2007 MASS SHOOTINGS AT VIRGINIA TECH APRIL 16, 2007 Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel Presented to Timothy M. Kaine, Governor Commonwealth of Virginia August 2007 CONTENTS FOREWORD...................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ix SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .............................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE................................................................... 5 Scope……………………………………………………………………… .......................... 5 Methodology………………………………………………………………. ........................ 6 Findings and Recommendations…………………………………………… .................. 10 CHAPTER II. UNIVERSITY SETTING AND SECURITY............................................. 11 University Setting………………………………………………………….. ..................... 11 Campus Police and Other Local Law Enforcement.................................................. 11 Building Security…………………………………………………………......................... 13 Campus Alerting Systems………………………………………………… ..................... 14 Emergency Response Plan…………………………………………………..................... 15 Key Findings……………………………………………………………… ........................ 16 Recommendations………………………………………………………… ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of International Law Scholars and Nongovernmental Organizations As Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees
    Case: 17-15589, 04/20/2017, ID: 10403831, DktEntry: 96, Page 1 of 40 No. 17-15589 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit STATE OF HAWAII, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants-Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKW-KSC District Judge Derrick K. Watson BRIEF OF INTERNATIONAL LAW SCHOLARS AND NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES By: s/ Aaron X. Fellmeth By: s/ Joseph M. McMillan Aaron X. Fellmeth By: s/ Michelle L. Maley Arizona State University Joseph M. McMillan, WSBA No. 26527 Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Michelle L. Maley, WSBA No. 51318 Mail Code 9520 Perkins Coie LLP 111 E. Taylor St. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Phoenix, AZ 85004-4467 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: 480.241.8414 Telephone: 206.359.8000 [email protected] Facsimile: 206.359.9000 By: s/ Jonathan Hafetz [email protected] Jonathan Hafetz [email protected] Seton Hall University School of Law One Newark Center Newark, NJ 07102 Telephone: 917.355.6896 [email protected] LEGAL135011644.5 Case: 17-15589, 04/20/2017, ID: 10403831, DktEntry: 96, Page 2 of 40 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 29(a)(4)(A), amici curiae certify that they have no parent corporations or any publicly held corporations owning 10% or more of their stock. DATED this 20th day of April, 2017. By: s/ Aaron X. Fellmeth By: s/ Joseph M.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilities, Preferences and Choice
    Utilities, Preferences and Choice By: Martin Kroh and Cees van der Eijk (both ASCoR/University of Amsterdam) First draft — Please comment copyright © 2003 by Martin Kroh & Cees van der Eijk Paper prepared for the joint sessions of workshops of the ECPR in Edinburgh, March 2003. Direct correspondence to: Martin Kroh. Universiteit van Amsterdam/ ASCoR. Oudezijds Achterburgwal 237, 1012 DL Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [email protected] Cees van der Eijk. Universiteit van Amsterdam/ ASCoR. Oudezijds Achterburgwal 237, 1012 DL Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [email protected]. 1 In this paper we argue that theories of party choice are implicitly not about choice, but about electoral preferences or utilities. This distinction is not trivial, as individual choice can be deduced from individual preferences or utilities, whereas the reverse is not necessarily true. In spite of this, a large part of empirical electoral research is (implicitly) based on the analysis of ‘revealed’ preferences, i.e. preferences that have been deduced from choice by using interpersonal comparison to make up the informational deficit at the individual level. We argue that the risks of this approach can be avoided by an alternative approach, that entails the empirical observation of electoral utility. A practical procedure for doing so is presented, and some validating analyses are reported. 1. Individual Choice Theory Theories of individual choice behavior conceptualize choice as a function of the characteristics of the decision maker, of the set of available alternatives and their attributes, and a decision rule. Given a fixed set of alternatives and their attributes, individual choice is commonly construed in two steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Tournament 15 Round 15 Tossups 1
    Tournament 15 Round 15 Tossups 1. This man's capitol near Qantir, abandoned shortly after his death, was excavated by Manfred Bietak. Most of this man's sons were buried at a site known as KV5. Succeeded by Merneptah, this ruler along with Hattusili III of the Hittites signed what is considered the first peace treaty in history. The son of Seti I, this ruler with temples dedicated to him at (*) Karnak and Abu Simbel was the victor at the Battle of Kadesh. For 10 points, name this New Kingdom Egyptian pharaoh often referred to as "the Great." ANSWER: Ramses II [or Ramesses the Great; or Ozymandias; prompt on Ramses; prompt on Ramesses] 084-10-19-15102 2. This figure's enemies included Camilla of the Volsci and Turnus of the Rutuli, whom he defeated to avenge Pallas. His father was a mortal lover of Aphrodite, whom he carried on his back out of a burning city. His son (*) Ascanius founded Alba Longa, a precursor of Rome. After landing at Carthage, he had an affair with Dido, whom he later spurned. For 10 points, name this hero of an epic poem by Virgil. ANSWER: Aeneas 024-10-19-15103 3. Helical grooves in a thin layer of carbon or metal are used in the construction of the film type of these components, while nichrome (NYE-krome) is used in making the wirewound type. Like capacitors, a four color band code is used to label these devices. Potentiometers are made from three terminal ones, and four of these elements are used in a (*) Wheatstone bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Tee Time in Berzerkistan: a Doonesbury Book Free
    FREE TEE TIME IN BERZERKISTAN: A DOONESBURY BOOK PDF G B Trudeau | 240 pages | 26 Nov 2009 | Andrews McMeel Publishing | 9780740773570 | English | Kansas City, United States Tee Time in Berzerkistan A Doonesbury Book Books – oakenthreader The first collections of Garry Trudeau 's comic strip Doonesbury were published in the early s by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Annual collections of strips continue to the present day, and are currently published by Andrews McMeel Publishing. The appearance and contents of the annual collections have changed over the years, but first printings of the books fall in six distinctly different Tee Time in Berzerkistan: A Doonesbury Book. White cover background, app. Each title contains dailies 1 only dailies, though. Colored cover background, app. Each title contains dailies. Multicolored covers, title with large initial. Otherwise identical in appearance to 's 14— Multicolored covers, app. Contents vary widely, each title holding — dailies and Sundays. Each title contains dailies and 48 Sundays — with three exceptions:. Hardbound with dust cover, app. Contents vary:. From toHenry Holt and Company reprinted select cartoons in an annual edition called the Doonesbury Desk Diary. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Doonesburycreated by Garry Trudeau. Mike Doonesbury Mark Slackmeyer B. Doonesburythe musical Doonesbury collections Rap Master Ronnie. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn Tee Time in Berzerkistan: A Doonesbury Book edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Add links. List of published collections of Doonesbury - Wikipedia Fortunately, the pariah state and its hole golf course, built overnight by Kurds and Jews borders Iran, a fact that K Street uberlobbyist Duke is retained to parlay into a major U.
    [Show full text]
  • World Development Studies 9 the Elusive Miracle
    UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNUAVIDER) World Development Studies 9 The elusive miracle Latin America in the 1990s Hernando Gomez Buendia This study has been prepared within the UNUAVIDER project on the Challenges of Globalization, Regionalization and Fragmentation under the 1994-95 research programme. Professor Hernando Gomez Buendia was holder of the UNU/WIDER-Sasakawa Chair in Development Policy in 1994-95. UNUAVIDER gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Sasakawa Foundation. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER) A research and training centre of the United Nations University The Board of UNU/WIDER Sylvia Ostry Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, Chairperson Antti Tanskanen George Vassiliou Ruben Yevstigneyev Masaru Yoshitomi Ex Officio Heitor Gurgulino de Souza, Rector of UNU Giovanni Andrea Cornia, Director of UNU/WIDER UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER) was established by the United Nations University as its first research and training centre and started work in Helsinki, Finland in 1985. The purpose of the Institute is to undertake applied research and policy analysis on structural changes affecting the developing and transitional economies, to provide a forum for the advocacy of policies leading to robust, equitable and environmentally sustainable growth, and to promote capacity strengthening and training in the field of economic and social policy making. Its work is carried out by staff researchers and visiting scholars in Helsinki and through networks of collaborating scholars and institutions around the world. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER) Katajanokanlaituri 6 B 00160 Helsinki, Finland Copyright © UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER) Cover illustration prepared by Juha-Pekka Virtanen at Forssa Printing House Ltd Camera-ready typescript prepared by Liisa Roponen at UNU/WIDER Printed at Forssa Printing House Ltd, 1996 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdsourcing Applications of Voting Theory Daniel Hughart
    Crowdsourcing Applications of Voting Theory Daniel Hughart 5/17/2013 Most large scale marketing campaigns which involve consumer participation through voting makes use of plurality voting. In this work, it is questioned whether firms may have incentive to utilize alternative voting systems. Through an analysis of voting criteria, as well as a series of voting systems themselves, it is suggested that though there are no necessarily superior voting systems there are likely enough benefits to alternative systems to encourage their use over plurality voting. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................... 6 Voting Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 10 Condorcet ................................................................................................................................. 11 Smith ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Condorcet Loser ........................................................................................................................ 15 Majority ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Social Media in Popular Discourse
    REPRESENTATIONS OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN POPULAR DISCOURSE REPRESENTATIONS OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN POPULAR DISCOURSE By PAMELA INGLETON, B.A. (Hons), M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Pamela Ingleton, December 2017 McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2017) Hamilton, Ontario (English and Cultural Studies) TITLE: Representations of Social Media in Popular Discourse AUTHOR: Pamela Ingleton, B.A. (Hons) (Queen’s University), M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Lorraine York NUMBER OF PAGES: ix, 248 ii Lay Abstract This sandwich thesis of works published from 2010 – 2017 considers how we talk and write about social media in relation to a variety of other concerns: authorship and popular fiction, writing and publishing, archives and everyday life, celebrity and the opaque morality of media promotion. The project addresses social networking platforms (primarily Twitter and Facebook) and those who serve and critique their interests (authors, readers, academics, “everyday people,” national archives, celebrities and filmmakers), often focusing on the “meta” of the media they take as their focus: “extratexts,” reviews and interviews, tweets about books and books about tweets, critical reception, etc. By examining writing on and about social media, this work offers an alternative, context-specific approach to new media scholarship that, in its examination of things said and unsaid, will help inform our contemporary understanding of social media and, by extension, our social media experience. iii Abstract This sandwich thesis of works published from 2010 – 2017 takes up the discursive articulation of “social media” as a mobilizing concept in relation to a variety of other concerns: authorship and popular fiction, writing and publishing, archives and everyday life, celebrity and the opaque morality of media promotion.
    [Show full text]