DOCSLIB.ORG

Enabling Income Trading in Your Brokerage Account.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enabling Income Trading in Your Brokerage Account.Pages Enabling Income Generation in Your Brokerage Account by Thomas Moore As you’ll notice as you read my twice-weekly blog posts, the OptionThink.com web site is focused on generating monthly income by selling equity options. Specifically, I use put selling on stocks that I don’t already own, and covered calls on stocks that I do own. If you are new to options trading, or if you have only bought call and puts, then starting a trade by selling options first might seem a little counter-intuitive. You can refer to the Homestudy Kit area of the website to get more specific information about how put selling and covered calls are done; there is a lot of information in the training videos and in my book, A Trade for All Seasons, that is available to you to get more familiar with how these strategies work. Before you can work with either covered calls or put selling, you have to make sure that your broker has reviewed and approved your account twice: once for options trading, and again for selling naked options. In this report, I want to take a little time to explain what this means, how the rules brokerages generally put in place for these types of trades affect you, and the steps you need to take to get the process started. If you have already been set up for options trading and put selling specifically, this report may still be useful as a review of the requirements you need to pay attention to as you place trades. Options Trading Authority Like stocks, options are also regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All equity options contracts are listed through the Chicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE). While not all stocks that are publicly traded on U.S. exchanges offer equity options, and not all brokerages are set up to facilitate options trading, the result is a consistent environment that gives all traders a fair opportunity to place the options trades they want and have them processed in an efficient and equitable fashion. In order to make options trading available, brokers are required to review each client by way of an application process above and beyond the establishment of the brokerage account by itself. The options authority application typically includes a simple questionnaire (mandated by federal regulation) about your investment objective, available funds, previous investment experience, and current investing objectives. Depending on your answers, the broker will approve or deny the application. Approval for options trading by your broker is broken down by trading tiers or levels; each level allows one or more different types of options trading activity. While some brokers use different terminology to describe these levels, they are most often boiled down to the following: !1 of !8 Options Authority Description Level 0 Buy Stocks, Bonds, and Mutual Funds Level 1 Covered Call writing/sell Stock short Level 2 Buy Calls and Puts, Cash-secured Put Selling Level 3 Debit Spreads Level 4 Credit Spreads/Naked Put Selling Level 5 Naked Call Selling/Naked Index Put & Call Selling Note that being approved for a higher level of trading also includes all of the levels below it. For example, if you are approved for Level 4 trading, you will also be able to use any of the strategies in Levels 0, 1, 2, and 3. If you are approved for options trading, your broker will notify you which level you have been approved for. The reason these different strategies are broken into different levels or tiers is because the higher level strategies, like debit or credit spreads and naked put selling, are very complex trading strategies; since they are harder to manage and can involve a higher level of risk, brokers limit these types of strategies to traders who have the required knowledge and experience to place and manage them as well as the larger sums of capital that are usually required to cover the underlying risk associated with them. Since the OptionThink blog uses Covered Calls and Put Selling as its primary trading strategies, you will need to request approval for Level 2 trading authority at minimum. If you haven’t already applied for options trading approval, talk to your broker for details on how to submit a new request. Options Trading and Margin Some of the strategies I’ve listed in the table above, such as selling a stock short, selling a naked equity call or put option, or selling naked index options, are only available if you have also set up a margin account along with being approved to trade options. Margin trading can be thought of as being able to borrow a portion of the amount of money required to place a trade from your broker. In simple terms, it gives you the ability to cover certain types of trades with money that you don’t have. The reason margin is required for these strategies is because by selling the options first, you accept the responsibility, or obligation, to fulfill the terms of the contract at some point in the future. In the case of a naked call, for example, you could be required to sell the stock to the option buyer at a fixed price that is below the stock’s current price. Since the current market price you would be forced to buy the stock at is uncertain, it isn’t a given you will have sufficient funds in your account to buy the stock and fulfill the obligation, so your margin account gives you the ability to make up the difference (up to a point) so you can deliver the stock to the call buyer. For the convenience of helping you cover the obligation, your broker will charge you an interest fee. The risk of margin trading is that if the stock has made a big move against you, your margin may not be sufficient to cover the trade, which means the broker would have to issue you a margin call. A margin call would require you to deposit additional funds in your !2 of !8 account to cover whatever shortfall exists; if you cannot do so, you may be forced to surrender other assets or property. Keep in mind that brokers each have their own margin trading requirements, rules, and limits. If you are interested in margin trading, check with your broker to get a complete breakdown and detailed explanation. Make sure you have a complete understanding of how their requirements will impact your trading before you use any available margin in the account. Cash-Secured Put Selling vs. Naked Put Selling A few paragraphs ago, I told you that to work with the strategies that are the focus of OptionThink, you need to be approved for Level 2 options trading at minimum. Covered calls and cash-secured puts do NOT use margin; instead, the potential obligation of covering a stock assignment from a put sell is covered by available cash in your account. If you aren’t approved for margin trading, this also means that you will not be able to sell puts on stocks that would create a larger obligation than you have the money to cover. Let’s use an example to illustrate. Suppose that you have a $50,000 trading account, and you read one of my weekly trading highlights on a stock that is currently trading at $53. In my post, I suggest selling a put option with a $50 strike price. Selling a put option means that you are giving the put buyer the right to sell the stock back to you at the option’s strike price - $50 in this case. As long as the stock stays above $50 the buyer will have no reason to exercise the option, so the option will simply expire worthless, and you’ll keep the entire premium you received when you initiated the trade (which is the reason I suggested selling the put in the first place). What if the stock has dropped below $50 before the put expires? Let’s suppose the stock is at $40 on expiration day. Now the put buyer is certain to exercise their option; they can buy the stock at the current market rate ($40) and force you to buy the shares from them at $50. They will make a $10 per share profit, less the premium they paid you at the beginning of the trade. Here’s the part that you need to keep in mind for the duration of the trade: the strike price of the put option you sell is the price you could be required to buy the stock at, which means that to cover the trade, you have to have enough cash available to buy the stock at that price. Remember that one option contract contract controls 100 shares of the underlying stock; suppose that in our example trade, you sold 2 contracts. You would need to have enough cash in your account to cover buying 200 shares of the underlying stock at $50 per share. 200 shares X $50 per share = $10,000 cash requirement If you already have open positions in your account that have taken up all of your available cash, and you aren’t approved for margin trading, you won’t be able to sell another put option until you either deposit more cash in the account or close one of your existing positions to make cash available. Now let’s use the same example trade on a margin account. For the sake of our example, we’ll assume that your broker requires you to maintain at least 50% of the strike price you’ve sold, so for this trade, they are willing to extend as much as $5,000 of credit to you to cover the trade.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Margin Requirements Across Equity-Related Instruments: How Level Is the Playing Field?
    Fortune pgs 31-50 1/6/04 8:21 PM Page 31 Margin Requirements Across Equity-Related Instruments: How Level Is the Playing Field? hen interest rates rose sharply in 1994, a number of derivatives- related failures occurred, prominent among them the bankrupt- cy of Orange County, California, which had invested heavily in W 1 structured notes called “inverse floaters.” These events led to vigorous public discussion about the links between derivative securities and finan- cial stability, as well as about the potential role of new regulation. In an effort to clarify the issues, the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston sponsored an educational forum in which the risks and risk management of deriva- tive securities were discussed by a range of interested parties: academics; lawmakers and regulators; experts from nonfinancial corporations, investment and commercial banks, and pension funds; and issuers of securities. The Bank published a summary of the presentations in Minehan and Simons (1995). In the keynote address, Harvard Business School Professor Jay Light noted that there are at least 11 ways that investors can participate in the returns on the Standard and Poor’s 500 composite index (see Box 1). Professor Light pointed out that these alternatives exist because they dif- Peter Fortune fer in a variety of important respects: Some carry higher transaction costs; others might have higher margin requirements; still others might differ in tax treatment or in regulatory restraints. The author is Senior Economist and The purpose of the present study is to assess one dimension of those Advisor to the Director of Research at differences—margin requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Scholes Equations
    Chapter 8 Black-Scholes Equations 1 The Black-Scholes Model Up to now, we only consider hedgings that are done upfront. For example, if we write a naked call (see Example 5.2), we are exposed to unlimited risk if the stock price rises steeply. We can hedge it by buying a share of the underlying asset. This is done at the initial time when the call is sold. We are then protected against any steep rise in the asset price. However, if we hold the asset until expiry, we are not protected against any steep dive in the asset price. So is there a hedging that is really riskless? The answer was given by Black and Scholes, and also by Merton in their seminal papers on the theory of option pricing published in 1973. The idea is that a writer of a naked call can protect his short position of the option by buying a certain amount of the stock so that the loss in the short call can be exactly offset by the long position in the stock. This is standard in hedging. The question is how many stocks should he buy to minimize the risk? By adjusting the proportion of the stock and option continuously in the portfolio during the life of the option, Black and Scholes demonstrated that investors can create a riskless hedging portfolio where all market risks are eliminated. In an efficient market with no riskless arbitrage opportunity, any portfolio with a zero market risk must have an expected rate of return equal to the riskless interest rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Futures and Options Market UDC: 550.8:552.1 DOI: 10.17794/Rgn.2017.4.5
    45 The Mining-Geology-Petroleum Engineering Bulletin Oil and Gas Futures and Options Market UDC: 550.8:552.1 DOI: 10.17794/rgn.2017.4.5 Review scientiƤ c paper Ante Nosi©1; Daria Karasalihovi© Sedlar2; Lucija Juki©3 1 INA Industrija nafte d.d., V.Holjevca 10, 10 000 Zagreb, Master of Pet. Eng. 2 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb, DSc, Associate Professor 3 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Pierottijeva 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Master of Pet. Eng, Assistant Abstract Energy mineral resource markets are represented by complex supply and demand ratios which are depending on diơ er- ent factors such as technical (transport) and geopolitical. The main characteristicof energy markets is represented by an uneven geographic distribution of hydrocarbon reserves and production on one hand, and energy consumption on the other. World oil markets, although geographically localized, because of speciƤ c market trade, represent a unique global market with a decreasing price diơ erence. Price diơ erences are the result of the development of transport possibilities of oil supply. The development of transport routes of natural gas and an increasing number of liqueƤ ed natural gas termi- nals in the world give pressure to the natural gas market and its integration into the global gas market. The integration of regional gas markets into a common European gas market is the main energy policy of EU concerning natural gas. On the other hand, there are still signiƤ cant price diơ erences on some markets (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hedging with a Stock Option”
    IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 17, Issue 9.Ver. I (Sep. 2015), PP 06-11 www.iosrjournals.org “Hedging With a Stock Option” Afzal Ahmad Assistant Professor of Accounting International Islamic University Chittagong Chittagong Abstract: The aim of this paper is to provide a discussion of the use of stock options in risk management and how they can be used for hedging purposes. This aim is achieved by reviewing the literature and analysing practical hedging examples in the context of an investment company. The results of the discussion show that stock options can be employed by companies as a protection against the downside risk when volatility in the market is high. They can also be used during the periods of low volatility to achieve a specific expected payoff within a band of stock prices. The case study reviewed the strategies that involved naked put and calls as well as more complex hedging procedures, namely the butterfly strategy and the bear spread strategy. By purchasing a put option or selling a call option, the company anticipates a decrease in stock prices as in this case there would be a positive payoff. However, when higher prices are anticipated, the company is interested in purchasing a call option or selling a put option. The butterfly strategy allows the firm to cut potential losses and profits to a specific range whereas the bear spread protects against an increase in volatility. The latter strategy implies entering positions in options with different strike prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Put Selling Strategy Rules
    Put selling strategy rules Theme This strategy is not my own original strategy. Over time I have seen a few traders teaching this strategy. I practiced this strategy a few years ago and turned my initial $2,000 account into $21,000 in about a year and a half. It is a very profitable strategy if done well and correctly. If wrong, you can ruin your own account. Later, when I considered myself a king of the world, I switched into trading SPX spreads in hoping to make even more money. I lost them all. The strategy is as follows: 1) Sell puts against a dividend stock as long as you get assigned and buy the stock 2) Buy the stock, keep it, collect dividends 3) Sell covered calls against the stock as long as you get assigned and sell the stock 4) Sell the stock 5) Rinse and repeat This strategy offers a lot of variations and with a great dose of imagination you will be able to use it even beyond these simple steps. Over time you will see, that this strategy can help you make money even when you end up in a disastrous, loosing trade. Creating a stock list Create a list of at least 30 stocks to choose from. I select dividend stocks because if I get assigned I am OK to buy the stock. The worst thing you want to do ever is trying to defend your ITM position because you do not want the stock. Although, primarily I choose dividend stocks, it is OK to have a few good quality non-dividend stocks, so don’t limit yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • Volatility Uncertainty and the Cross-Section of Option Returns*
    Volatility Uncertainty and * the Cross-Section of Option Returns [December 24, 2019] Jie Cao The Chinese University of Hong Kong E-mail: [email protected] Aurelio Vasquez ITAM E-mail: [email protected] Xiao Xiao Erasmus University Rotterdam E-mail: [email protected] Xintong Zhan The Chinese University of Hong Kong E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper studies the relation between the uncertainty of volatility, measured as the volatility of volatility, and future delta-hedged equity option returns. We find that delta-hedged option returns consistently decrease in uncertainty of volatility. Our results hold for different measures of volatility such as implied volatility, EGARCH volatility from daily returns, and realized volatility from high-frequency data. The results are robust to firm characteristics, stock and option liquidity, volatility characteristics, and jump risks, and are not explained by common risk factors. Our findings suggest that option dealers charge a higher premium for single-name options with high uncertainty of volatility, because these stock options are more difficult to hedge. * We thank Peter Christoffersen, Christian Dorion, Bjorn Eraker, Stephen Figlewski, Amit Goyal, Bing Han, Jianfeng Hu, Kris Jacobs, Inmoo Lee, Lei Jiang, Neil Pearson, and seminar participants at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, HEC Montréal, Wilfrid Laurier University, and University of Hong Kong. We have benefited from the comments of participants at the 2018 Canadian Derivatives Institute (CDI) Annual Conference, the 2018 China International Conference in Finance, the 2018 Northern Finance Association Annual Conference, and the 2018 SFS Cavalcade Asia-Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Financial Derivatives
    An Introduction to Lecture 3 Mathematical Finance UiO-STK-MAT3700 Autumn 2018 Professor: S. Ortiz-Latorre Basic Financial Derivatives The valuation of financial derivatives will be based on the principle of no arbitrage. Definition 1. Arbitrage means making of a guaranteed risk free profit with a trade or a series of trades in the market. Definition 2. An arbitrage free market is a market which has no opportunities for risk free profit. Definition 3. An arbitrage free price for a security is a price that ensure that no arbitrage opportunity can be designed with that security. The principle of no arbitrage states that the markets must be arbitrage free. Some financial jargon will be used in what follows. One says that has/takes a long position on an asset if one owns/is going to own a positive amount of that asset. One says that has/takes a short position on an asset if one has/is going to have a negative amount of that asset. Being short on money means borrowing. You can take a short position on many financial assets by short selling. Example 4 (Short selling). To implement some trading strategy you need to sell some amount of shares (to get money and invest in other assets). The problem is that you do not have any shares right now. Then, you can borrow the shares from another investor for a time period (paying interest) and sell the borrowed shares in the market to get the money you need for your strategy. To close this position, at the end of the borrowing period you must buy again the shares in the market and give them back to the lender.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalemate in Spain
    INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS & PRODUCTS Investment Alert International Wealth Management, 21/12/2015 Spain Stalemate in Spain No obvious alliance for an absolute majority in the 350 seat Parliament. Near-term prospects for growth are still solid, but some growing uncertainty about the medium term and the sustainability of the public debt. Michael O'Sullivan European periphery. The strong showing of Podemos will re- CIO – UK & EEMEA michael.o'[email protected], +41 44 332 81 73 mind many investors of the similar rise of Syriza in Greece. Second, there is the possibility that political uncertainty proves Anne-Charlotte Perot Investment Strategy Europe & CH disruptive economically. Here we would emphasize that, in [email protected], +41 44 333 17 23 terms of consumer confidence, job creation and most lead in- dicators, Spain has considerable economic momentum and this may at least prove resilient in the short run. Sunday’s general election in Spain has failed to deliver a decis- ive result, and has produced a number of surprises. With no ob- vious government in sight, Spanish equities and bonds have Possible scenario of alliance sold off. The incumbent PP party (People’s Party) has ob- In terms of what materializes next, a new parliament will be tained 123 seats, the socialist PSOE came second with 90 formed on 13 January and will be able to vote for the first seats, and Podemos and Ciudadanos obtained 69 and 40 time. After this, the government approval process should not seats, respectively. While prime minister Mariano Rajoy’s PP exceed two months; otherwise new elections would have to be party has re-emerged in the pole position, its ability to form a called.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivatives Primer Analyst: Michele Wong
    The NAIC’s Capital Markets Bureau monitors developments in the capital markets globally and analyzes their potential impact on the investment portfolios of U.S. insurance companies. A list of archived Capital Markets Bureau Primers is available via the INDEX. Derivatives Primer Analyst: Michele Wong Executive Summary • Derivatives are contracts whose value is based on an observable underlying value—a security’s or commodity’s price, an interest rate, an exchange rate, an index, or an event. • U.S. insurers primarily use derivatives to hedge risks (such as interest rate risk, credit risk, currency risk and equity risk) and, to a lesser extent, replicate assets and generate additional income. • The primary risks associated with derivatives use include market risk, liquidity risk and counterparty risks. • Derivatives use laws, NAIC model regulations, derivatives use plans and statutory accounting requirements are important components in the oversight of derivatives use by U.S. insurers. What Are Derivatives? Derivatives are contracts whose value, at one or more future points in time, is based on an observable underlying value—a security’s or commodity’s price, an interest rate, exchange rate, index, or event, such as a credit default. The derivatives contract is between two parties and specifies terms under which payments are to be made, depending on fluctuations in the value of the underlying. Specified terms typically include notional amount, price, premium, maturity date, delivery date, and reference entity or underlying asset. Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles (SSAP) No. 86 – Derivatives defines a “derivative instrument” as “an agreement, option, instrument or a series or combination thereof: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Better to Go Naked on the Street--A Primer on the Options Market Henry F
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 55 | Issue 1 Article 1 10-1-1979 Is It Better to Go Naked on the Street--A Primer on the Options Market Henry F. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Henry F. Johnson, Is It Better to Go Naked on the Street--A Primer on the Options Market, 55 Notre Dame L. Rev. 7 (1979). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol55/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~Ntrt km iaiw i rr Volume 55 Number 1October 1979 Is It Better to Go Naked on the Street? A Primer on the Options Market Henry F. Johnson* I. Introduction Until recently, trading of puts and calls, more commonly termed options,t were primarily limited to wealthy individuals or to professional traders. 2 One reason for the failure of the general public to make greater use of stock options was the mistaken belief that such options were extremely complicated invest- ment instruments. Many investors felt that there was no real opportunity in puts and calls unless they had large amounts of investment capital, or had ac- cess to professional expertise. 3 Even the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seemed to agree. In an early study, the SEC found that writers of puts and calls were generally individuals or institutions who held large stock port- 4 folios.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Options
    Introduction to Options 2021 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. What are options? ........................................................................................ 4 1.1 What is an option? ................................................................................... 5 Description of options................................................................................... 6 2.1 How does an option work? ...................................................................... 7 Contract specifications ................................................................................. 8 3.1 Standardisation ....................................................................................... 9 3.2 Types of options ...................................................................................... 9 3.3 Settlement type upon exercise .............................................................. 10 3.4 Underlying values .................................................................................. 10 3.5 Currency ................................................................................................ 10 3.6 Option premium..................................................................................... 10 3.7 Adjustment ............................................................................................ 11 What can options be used for? ................................................................... 12 4.1 Making a profit ...................................................................................... 13 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Opinion of the Commission
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 78049A / July 7, 2016 INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 Release No. 4420A / July 7, 2016 INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 Release No. 32146A / July 7, 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-15141 In the Matter of MOHAMMED RIAD and KEVIN TIMOTHY SWANSON AMENDED OPINION OF THE COMMISSION CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDING INVESTMENT ADVISER PROCEEDING INVESTMENT COMPANY PROCEEDING Grounds for Remedial Action Antifraud Violations Respondents, who were associated with registered investment adviser, made fraudulent misstatements and omitted material facts in a closed-end fund’s shareholder reports regarding the fund’s use of new derivative investments and their effect on the fund’s performance and risk exposure. Held, it is in the public interest to bar respondents from associating with a broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, or transfer agent; order respondents to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or further violations of the provisions violated; order disgorgement; and assess civil penalties of $130,000 against each respondent. 2 APPEARANCES: Richard D. Marshall of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, for respondents. Robert M. Moye, Benjamin J. Hanauer, and Jeffrey A. Shank, for the Division of Enforcement. Petition for review filed: June 4, 2014 Last brief received: February 15, 2016 Oral argument: March 16, 2016 I. Introduction Respondents Mohammed Riad and Kevin Timothy Swanson appeal from an administrative law judge’s initial decision finding that they violated the antifraud provisions of the securities laws while associated with an investment adviser responsible for managing the portfolio of a closed-end investment company, the Fiduciary/Claymore Dynamic Equity Fund (the “Fund”).1 Based on our independent, de novo review of the record, we find that both respondents committed fraud by misrepresenting and omitting material information about new derivatives in the Fund’s 2007 annual and May 2008 semiannual reports.
    [Show full text]