LEARNING to PLAY to LEARN Lessons in Educational Game Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LEARNING to PLAY to LEARN Lessons in Educational Game Design LEARNING TO PLAY TO LEARN Lessons in Educational Game Design Nick Fortugno & Eric Zimmerman An Education in Educational Games Educational games are a hot topic these days. From game developers and learning theorists to classroom teachers and policy wonks, all manner of curious folk seem drawn to games that teach something, to someone, in some way or another. However, the only consensus in this whirlwind of activity seems to be that educational games are something of a failure. To quote industry veteran Brenda Laurel at a recent conference, “I can sum up educational games in one word – and that word is... CRAP!” Why would anyone want to take part in such a doomed enterprise? Educators are energized by games’ ability to engage with students, to capture their wayward attention and help them learn in rich and dynamic ways. Game designers and developers are increasingly drawn to create educational games as well – perhaps from a desire to make new kinds of games, to create work with a purpose beyond pure entertainment, or even just as an escape from the rigid confines of the mainstream game industry. Each of these camps – developers and educators – has its own agenda for taking on projects, its own set of particular dissatisfactions with the current crop of educational games, and – all too often – a complete lack of experience with the concerns of those working on the other side. We (Nick & Eric) have designed games for both entertainment and education. And in the process of juggling player enjoyment and learning goals, development schedules and research agendas, we’ve learned that there are a great many misconceptions regarding educational games. Some of these misconceptions come from educators and some from game developers. In the spirit of bridging this divide, we’d like to tackle head-on some of the key issues involved in creating educational games. Our position, in a nutshell, is that no one has all the answers. Developers and educators need to work together to tackle these issues. So in the short space that follows, we have tried to highlight some of the ways that educators, developers, and others involved in creating and studying educational games fail to see eye to eye. Perhaps by planting some seeds in the fertile “crap” of current educational games, we can begin to grow some new ways of thinking. Game design fundamentals As game designers, we’re loath to theorize on how and why people learn. Cognitive neuroscientists, learning theorists, and professional educators work on these problems full-time. But just as we always seek out the research and advice of our educator colleagues to better understand the learning process, we do know what we have to bring to the discussion. And that is a thoroughgoing knowledge of game design. It may sound trite, but for us educational games are first and foremost games. Whether a bona-fide contest with logical rules and a winning condition, or a Sim City-style sandbox playtoy, a game experience needs to have certain basic elements to be a meaningful experience for players. These elements include interactivity designed with clarity of input and output; short-term and long-term goals to shape the player’s experience, a well- designed ramp for beginners to learn the ropes; and a game structure that actually contains the possibly of genuine play, not just quiz-style questions and answers. Why emphasize what seems so obvious? Because many times we’ve seen educators entering into game development that are content to transfer the style of games onto educational tasks without understanding the substance of what makes a game work. And without these fundamentals, the end experience can be dead in the water. What exactly creates that elusive feeling of “play?” No one really knows. And it varies from game to game. But experienced game designers are probably the best-equipped folks to bring it into your project. Respect the challenge Everyone – both developers and educators – forgets this one: making games is really hard. Even creating a wholly derivative game (a blow-by-blow clone of Bejeweled, or You Don’t Know Jack, or Tomb Raider) is incredibly difficult to do well. When you add to this the ambition of creating an innovative game with new kinds of content and gameplay, as well as a game that actually tries to teach something meaningful to players, the problem is multiplied by orders of magnitude. So one piece of advice we’d offer to those going into educational games: keep it simple. Set your sights lower than a massively multiplayer online role-playing game, or a simulation with the depth and complexity of The Sims. Resources are typically limited in an educational game project, and it usually takes guerrilla-style design thinking to pull something off. For example, if your game needs online player interaction, there are many ways to socialize on a computer besides a full-blown real-time 3D world. Don’t rule out a Habbo Hotel-style 2D world, a turn-based game a la SiSSYFiGHT, imaginative use of message boards and email, or even hotseat-style interaction in front of a single terminal. This is why we are skeptical of many educators’ claims that given access to the latest game engines, they will be able to create top-notch educational games and succeed where everyone else has failed. It’s simply not going to happen. Tools by their nature limit as least as much as they liberate, and creating innovative games on any scale usually means coding them from scratch. That’s not to discourage educators from getting into game development. But all sides that want to get involved need to recognize the challenges and demands of making games. Embrace the “gameness” of games Part of these demands involve the recognition of what is essential to a game. Many people diving into educational games want to capture the excitement and interest that games inspire but simultaneously excise those very aspects of games that generate passion in players. Take the idea of “competition.” One common misconception we’ve seen among educators is to view competition between players as a hindrance to the learning process. Not wanting to classify people as “winners” or “losers,” they envision feel-good cooperative experiences were nobody has to come in second. While well-intentioned, this approach completely misunderstands how competition and collaboration function in games. Every game contains a seed of conflict, whether it comes from the human opponent of a chess game, the hidden word in a game of twenty questions, or a field of AI enemies in a console shooter. The struggle to overcome these obstacles, the engagement necessary to outwit the opponent or solve the riddle, is a primary source of fun. At the same time, every game also intrinsically involves collaboration. Even the most aggressive boxing match requires the fighters to agree to the rules of the game: no foreign objects, no hitting an opponent who’s down, and respect for the judges’ call at the end of the bout. This accord between players is at the heart of any play experience and is exactly what creates the environment where winning and losing are both fair and safe – preparing the way for the game to be played in the first place. Competition and collaboration is just one example of the “gameness” of games. The excitement of games doesn’t magically emerge from fancy graphics, well-written stories, or point-based rewards. Good games integrate a number of complex elements (moments of decision-making, challenging goals, rewarding feedback, etc.) to create a fun play experience. The best way to understand all of this is to try these games yourself. Good game designers don’t just make games; they play them. Lots of them. The best learning games research groups, from MIT to University of Wisconsin to Copenhagen’s IT-U and Learning Lab, incorporate daily hours of play into their practice. If you want to make games, you need to know them, and to know them, you need to get your hands dirty playing them. Process, not data By now, everyone has heard of the poor poster child of educational game crappiness, Math Blaster. Given a mandatory mention at every educational game conference, Math Blaster’s drill-and-practice design carries the failed weight of learning and games on its straw-man shoulders. We don’t see any need to point out yet again how Math Blaster falls short. We’d rather discuss how to avoid making a Math Blaster in the first place. One crucial step is recognizing the importance of process-based gameplay. One feature in all good games is a marriage of form and content. If you want to make a game about car racing, you want the game’s play to feel like racing – fast and risky with lots of quick thinking and make-or-break decisions. A game about diplomacy (like, say, Diplomacy) should not just depict but embody the heady distrust, provisional alliance- making, and social give-and-take of politics. There’s no one right way to design play for any given content, but the result should be that the way the players interact with the game, the process of play, parallels what the game is about. To restate this subtle point, the play of a game is not just graphics, audio, and text. Play is an activity, and the content of a game should be expressed in that activity. The actual repeated actions, decisions and choices, and thinking processes that the game design engenders should themselves embody what the game is about. This is easier said than done – especially for new kinds of subject matter.
Recommended publications
  • Game Changer: Investing in Digital Play to Advance Children’S Learning and Health, New York: the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop
    Game 2 changer: June 2009 Investing in digital play to advance children's learning and health Ann My Thai David Lowenstein Dixie Ching David Rejeski The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop © The Joan Ganz Cooney Center !""#. All rights reserved. The mission of the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop is to foster innovation in children’s learning through digital media. The Center supports action research, encourages partnerships to connect child development experts and educators with interactive media and technology leaders, and mobilizes public and private investment in promising and proven new media technologies for children. For more information, visit www.joanganzcooneycenter.org. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center is committed to disseminating useful and timely research. Working closely with our Cooney Fellows, national advisers, media scholars, and practitioners, the Center publishes industry, policy, and research briefs examining key issues in the $eld of digital media and learning. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.joanganzcooneycenter.org. Individual print copies of this publication are available for %&' via check, money order, or purchase order sent to the address below. Bulk-rate prices are available on request. For permission to reproduce excerpts from this report, please contact: Attn: Publications Department The Joan Ganz Cooney Center Sesame Workshop One Lincoln Plaza New York, NY &""!( p: !&! '#' ()'* f: !&! +,' ,("+ [email protected] Suggested citation: Thai, A., Lowenstein, D., Ching, D., & Rejeski, D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sense of Presence: Mediating an American Apocalypse
    religions Article A Sense of Presence: Mediating an American Apocalypse Rachel Wagner Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Here I build upon Robert Orsi’s work by arguing that we can see presence—and the longing for it—at work beyond the obvious spaces of religious practice. Presence, I propose, is alive and well in mediated apocalypticism, in the intense imagination of the future that preoccupies those who consume its narratives in film, games, and role plays. Presence is a way of bringing worlds beyond into tangible form, of touching them and letting them touch you. It is, in this sense, that Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward observe the “re-emergence” of religion with a “new visibility” that is much more than “simple re-emergence of something that has been in decline in the past but is now manifesting itself once more.” I propose that the “new awareness of religion” they posit includes the mediated worlds that enchant and empower us via deeply immersive fandoms. Whereas religious institutions today may be suspicious of presence, it lives on in the thick of media fandoms and their material manifestations, especially those forms that make ultimate promises about the world to come. Keywords: apocalypticism; Orsi; enchantment; fandom; video games; pervasive games; cowboy; larp; West 1. Introduction Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward observe the “re-emergence” of religion today with a “new visibility” that is “far more complex and nuanced than simple re-emergence of something that has been in decline in the past but is now manifesting itself once more” (Hoelzl and Ward 2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ludic Garden
    THE LUDIC GARDEN: THE WORK OF PLAY IN COMPOSITION AND RHETORIC By JACOB EUTENEUER Bachelor of Arts in English University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska 2009 Master of Arts in English Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 2012 Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing University of Akron Akron, OH 2015 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2019 THE LUDIC GARDEN: THE WORK OF PLAY IN COMPOSITION AND RHETORIC Dissertation Approved: Joshua Daniel-Wariya Dissertation Adviser Lynn Lewis Anna Sicari Tutaleni Asino ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the unending support of my wife, Jamie. Her guidance, encouragement, love, and support are the unseen threads that hold this work together. In addition to Jamie, I would like to thank our two sons, Oliver and Peter. Their curiosity and joy are what have driven me throughout this long process. Many of the video games mentioned throughout this dissertation were played with them at my side, stomping Koopa Troopas or vanquishing evil from the land of Hyrule. I would also like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, Joshua Daniel- Wariya, Lynn Lewis, Anna Sicari, and Tutaleni Asino. Their knowledge, wisdom, mentorship, energy, and labor have made this all possible. As a long time English major, it is common to see acknowledgement sections with nods to the authors and writers who have blazed the trail before them and inspired them to take up the study of language and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Spatial Ecosystems in Location-Based Mobile Gameplay
    Casual Play, Hardcore Community: Social and Spatial Ecosystems in Location-Based Mobile Gameplay Jessie Marchessault A Thesis In The Department Of Communication Studies Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts (Media Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada September 2020 © Jessie Marchessault, 2020 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Jessie Marchessault Entitled: Casual Play, Hardcore Community: Social and Spatial Ecosystems in Location-Based Mobile Gameplay and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Media Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: _______________________________ Chair _______________________________ Examiner Dr. Bart Simon _______________________________ Examiner Dr. Owen Chapman _______________________________ Supervisor Dr. Mia Consalvo Approved by _________________________________________________ Dr. Monika Gagnon ____________2020 ________________________________________ Dean of Faculty iii Abstract Casual Play, Hardcore Community: Social and Spatial Ecosystems in Location-Based Mobile Gameplay Jessie Marchessault, M.A. Concordia University, 2020 This thesis explores the social and spatial dynamics of two major Location-Based Mobile Games communities in Montréal. By conducting interviews and play sessions with fifteen active
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Kaitlin Elizabeth Hilburn 2017
    Copyright by Kaitlin Elizabeth Hilburn 2017 The Report Committee for Kaitlin Elizabeth Hilburn Certifies that this is the approved version of the following report: Transformative Gameplay Practices: Speedrunning through Hyrule APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Suzanne Scott Kathy Fuller-Seeley Transformative Gameplay Practices: Speedrunning through Hyrule by Kaitlin Elizabeth Hilburn, B.S. Comm Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2017 Dedication Dedicated to my father, Ben Hilburn, the first gamer I ever watched. Abstract Transformative Gameplay Practices: Speedrunning Through Hyrule Kaitlin Elizabeth Hilburn, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2017 Supervisor: Suzanne Scott The term “transformative” gets used in both fan studies and video game studies and gestures toward a creative productivity that goes beyond simply consuming a text. However, despite this shared term, game studies and fan studies remain fairly separate in their respective examination of fans and gamers, in part due to media differences between video games and more traditional media, like television. Bridging the gap between these two fields not only helps to better explain transformative gameplay, but also offers additional insights in how fans consume texts, often looking for new ways to experience the source text. This report examines the transformative gameplay practices found within video game fan communities and provides an overview of their development and spread. It looks at three facets of transformative gameplay, performance, mastery, and education, using the transformative gameplay practices around The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (1998) as a primary case study.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming Literacy Game Design As a Model for Literacy in the Twenty-First Century
    Page 23 CHAPTER 1 Gaming Literacy Game Design as a Model for Literacy in the Twenty-First Century ERIC ZIMMERMAN Introduction: Literacy and games from the inside-out Gaming literacy is an approach to literacy based on game design. My argument is that there is an emerging set of skills and competencies, a set of new ideas and practices that are going to be increasingly a part of what it means to be literate in the coming century. This essay’s proposal is that game design is a paradigm for understanding what these literacy needs are and how they might be addressed. I look at three main concepts—systems, play, and design—as key components of this new literacy. Traditional ideas about literacy have centered on reading and writing— the ability to understand, exchange, and create meaning through text, speech, and other forms of language. A younger cousin to literacy studies, media literacy extended this thinking to diverse forms of media, from images and music to film, television, and advertising. The emphasis in media literacy as it evolved during the 1980s was an ideological critique of the hidden codes embedded in media. Media studies’ scholars ask ques- tions like: Is a given instance of media racist or sexist? Who is creating it and with what agenda? What kinds of intended and unintended messages and meanings do media contain? Literacy and even media literacy are necessary but not sufficient for one to be fully literate in our world today. There are emerging needs for new 12:23:11:08:08 Page 23 Page 24 24 .
    [Show full text]
  • Designing a Virtual Reality Game for the Pediatric Patient-Player Experience
    Navigating the Pixelated Waters of Voxel Bay: Designing a Virtual Reality Game for the Pediatric Patient-Player Experience Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Fine Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alice Grishchenko Graduate Program in Design Ohio State University 2017 Thesis Committee: Alan Price Maria Palazzi Jeremy Patterson Copyright by Alice Grishchenko ©2017 All Rights Reserved Abstract Voxel Bay is a virtual reality game created in collaboration with Nationwide Children’s Hospital to distract pediatric hemophilia patients from the anxiety related to the prophylaxis infusion procedure they must undergo regularly. This paper documents answers to the question when designing a game to serve as a pain management distraction technique for pediatric patients, what factors should be considered for the overall experience of the patient-player, clinicians and caregivers, and what may be unique or different from conventional approaches to game development? The answers to the research question are presented in context to the development of Voxel Bay. They are a list of factors to be considered and a documentation of my contribution to the project. The game design concepts discussed include spatial level design for virtual reality and ways to world build without cut scenes. This paper also mentions the hardware configuration used to create an entertaining hands-free system without sacrificing the integrity of the player’s medical experience. After an exploration of these concepts, the paper describes the novel processes used to realize them. The design choices and process documentation are supported by a review of research precedents regarding virtual reality as a distraction tool for medical settings as well as games designed to be used with breathing peripherals, games that use a networked system with different user roles and games that directly inspired the design of Voxel Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • CV. Katie Salen
    CV. Katie Salen www.katiesalen.me Education 2011 Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters (L.H.D.) Bank Street College of Education 1990–1992 Rhode Island School of Design Master of Fine Arts 1985-1990 University of Texas at Austin Bachelor of Fine Arts Academic Appointments 2017-present Professor Informatics Department, Information and Computer Science University of California at Irvine 2011-2015 Professor School of Design, College of Computing and Digital Media DePaul University 2001-2011 Professor Design and Technology, School of Art, Media and Technology 2008-2011: Director, Center for Transformative Media 2001-2006: Director, Graduate Studies, Design and Technology Parsons the New School for Design, New School University 1996-2001 Associate Professor Design Program, School of Art and Art History University of Texas at Austin 1992-1996 Assistant Professor Design Program, School of Communication Art and Design Virginia Commonwealth University Non-Profit and Industry Experience 2015-present Connected Camps Co-Founder and Chief Design Officer Non-profit offering interest-driven, hands-on online learning for youth Culver City, CA | www.connectedcamps.com 2014-2016 Institute of Play Chief Design and Research Officer Non-profit focused on games and transformative modes of play New York, NY | www.instituteofplay.org 2007-2014 Institute of Play Founding Executive Director Non-profit focused on the intersections between games, design, and learning New York, NY | www.instituteofplay.org 2010-2013 Connected Learning Research Network Network Member
    [Show full text]
  • Pokéwalkers, Mafia Dons, and Football Fans Play Mobile with Me
    Katie Salen Pokéwalkers, Mafia Dons, and Football Fans Play Mobile with Me This paper addresses a theoretical reconfiguration of experience, a repositioning of the techno-social within the domains of mobil- ity, games, and play, and embodiment. The ideas aim to counter the notion that our experience with videogames (and digital me- dia more generally), is largely “virtual” and disembodied – or at most exclusively audiovisual. Notions of the virtual and disem- bodied support an often-tacit belief that technologically medi- ated experiences count for nothing if not perceived and valued as human. It is here where play in particular can be put to work, be made to highlight and clarify, for it is in play that we find this value of humanity most wholly embodied. Further, it is in consid- ering the design of the metagame that questions regarding the play experience can be most powerfully engaged. While most of any given game’s metagame emerges from play communities and their larger social worlds (putting it out of reach of game design proper), mobile platforms have the potential to enable a stitching together of these experiences: experiences held across time, space, communities, and bodies. This coming together thus represents a convergence not only of media, participants, contexts, and technologies, but of human experience itself. This coming together is hardly neat, nor fully realized. It is, if noth- ing else, multifaceted and worthy of further study. It is a conver- gence in which the dynamics of screen play are reengaged. Play is a structuring activity, the activity out of which understand- ing comes.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Exploring the Logics of Alternate Reality Games Jay Johnson University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2018 Issues with Reality: Defining and Exploring the Logics of Alternate Reality Games Jay Johnson University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Jay, "Issues with Reality: Defining and Exploring the Logics of Alternate Reality Games" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 1837. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1837 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSUES WITH REALITY: DEFINING AND EXPLORING THE LOGICS OF ALTERNATE REALITY GAMES by Jay Johnson A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August 2018 ABSTRACT ISSUES WITH REALITY: DEFINING AND EXPLORING THE LOGICS OF ALTERNATE REALITY GAMES by Jay Johnson The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2018 Under Supervision of Professor Stuart Moulthrop Alternate Reality Games (ARGs), a genre of transmedia experiences, are a recent phenomenon, with the first recognized ARG being The Beast (2001), a promotion for the film A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (2001). This dissertation seeks to more clearly define and investigate contexts of transmedia narratives and games, specifically ARGs. ARGs differ from more popular and well-known contemporary forms of gaming in several ways, perhaps most importantly by intensive use of multiple media.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Threshold Into New Worlds: Virtual Reality Game Worlds Beyond Narratives
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDIA STUDIES www.necsus-ejms.org At the threshold into new worlds: Virtual reality game worlds beyond narratives Kai Matuszkiewicz & Franziska Weidle NECSUS 8 (2), Autumn 2019: 5–23 URL: https://necsus-ejms.org/at-the-threshold-into-new-worlds-vir- tual-reality-game-worlds-beyond-narratives/ Keywords: digital games, fictionality, game worlds, storytelling, vir- tual reality Introduction In 2016, Facebook, Sony, and HTC released new Virtual Reality (VR) hard- ware. In combination with other VR devices such as Google’s Project Card- board and locomotion simulators (e.g. Virtuix Omni), Oculus rift, PlayStation VR, and Vive aim to push VR gaming into the mass market. A similar devel- opment appears to be happening in the Augmented Reality (AR) sector, with evermore hardware and applications available. Clearly, the entertainment in- dustry is getting increasingly interested in harnessing current technological advancements for their immersive capabilities and intense impact on the hu- man body. Debates on VR and its potentials for digital games often revolve around the concepts of fictionality and narrativity.[1] The premise of this paper is to scrutinise these theoretical frameworks and, more specifically, call for a re- finement in terminology. Are VR worlds[2] indeed fictional worlds that are inhabited by fictional characters? If so, do they tell stories or is there another, perhaps more suitable, way to describe world-making in VR systems? We understand virtuality, broadly conceived, as the condition of an entity to produce the appearance, actions, and atmospheres of any other entity but without actually being that entity. From a design perspective, virtuality im- plies a crafting of potentials.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Emergent Play in Mixed Reality
    Towards Emergent Play in Mixed Reality Patrick Misteli Steven Poulakos ETH Zurich Disney Research [email protected] [email protected] Mubbasir Kapadia Robert W. Sumner Rutgers University Disney Research, ETH Zurich [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT We demonstrate our system through an example experience This paper presents a system to experience emergent play within depicted in Fig. 4, which presents an adventure game where the a mixed reality environment. Real and virtual objects share a uni- player must overcome obstacles in order to achieve a goal. Obstacles fied representation to allow joint interactions. These objects may must be overcome by player interactions (e.g. using gesture, voice optionally contain an internal mental model to act autonomously and real object manipulation) to advance the experience. Our system based on their beliefs about the world. The experience utilizes intu- supports emergent play by giving the player feedback about the itive interaction patterns using voice, hand gestures and real object current experience and the freedom for mixed reality interactions. manipulation. We author experience by specifying dependency graphs and behavior models, which are extended to support player 2 RELATED WORK interactions. Feedback is provided to ensure the system and player Salen and Zimmerman broadly define play as free movement within share a common play experience, including awareness of obstacles a more rigid structure [28]. The player drives the experience, for and potential solutions. An author can mix features from game, example with the goal of “getting to know the properties of objects” story and agent-based experiences. We demonstrate our system or exploration of what can I do with this object" [9].
    [Show full text]