The Heat of Combustion of Beryllium in Fluorine*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Heat of Combustion of Beryllium in Fluorine* JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards -A. Physics and Chemistry Vol. 73A, No.3, May- June 1969 The Heat of Combustion of Beryllium in Fluorine* K. L. Churney and G. T. Armstrong Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234 (February 11, 1969) An expe rimental dete rmination of the e ne rgies of combustion in Auorine of polyte traAuoroethylene film and Q.o wder and of mixtures of beryllium with polytetraAuoroethyle ne gi ves for reacti on ( 1)f).H ~.or= - 1022.22 kJ 111 0 1- 1 (- 244.32 kcal mol - I) wit h a n ove ra ll precision of 0.96 kJ 111 0 1- 1 (0. 23 kcal 111 0 1- 1 ) at the 95 pe rce nt confid ence limit s. The tota l un cert a int y is estimated not to exceed ±3.2 kJ mol- I (±0.8 kcal mol - I). The measureme nts on polytetraflu oroeth yle ne giv e for reaction (2a) and reacti on (2 b) f).H ~. o c =- 10 369. 7 and - 10392.4 Jg- I, respective ly. Overall precisions e xpressed at the 95 pe rcent confide nce Ijmits are 3.3 and 6.0 Jg- I, respective ly. Be(c)+ F,(g) = BeF2(a morphous) (1) C,F.(polym e r powd er) + 2F2(g) = 2CF.(g) (2a) C2F.(polyme r film ) + 2F2 (g) = 2CF.(g) (2b) Be2C and Be metal were observed in a small carbonaceous residue from the co mbustion of the beryll iul11 -polytetraAuoroethylene mixtures. Methods of analys is for these s ubstances we re de veloped. Cases res ul t ing from the so lution of the so lid residues in aqueous KOH were analyzed for I-I, and CH. by differential absorption in molecular sieves at low temperatures. Key wo rds : Analysis of meth ane- hydrogen mixtures; beryllium flu oride; beryllium metal; com· bustion calorimetry; flu orine; heat of formation; mol ecular-sieve gas analys is; poly· tet raA uoroet hyl ene. i 1. Introduction I tion of BeF2(s) that is inde pende nt of the heats of formation of BeO(s) and HF(aq). Better than 99 percent No direct determination of the heat of formation of conversion of beryllium to beryllium fluoride was crystalline beryllium fluoride by combustion of obtained by the de vi ce of burning a mixture of beryl­ beryllium in fluorine has been published, probably lium and polytetraAuoroethyle ne (PTFE) in fluorine . because of the difficulty of obtaining reasonably complete combustion and the diffic ulty of obtaining X-ray analysis of the solid combustion products a crystalline beryllium fluoride product. showed that amorphous rather than crystalline BeF2 All the published determinations are indirect had been formed. The products also contained un­ and involve the heats of formation of BeO(s) and burned beryllium, appreciable quantities of Be2 C, and a residue containing carbon and fluorine. The HF(aq). A heat of formation of BeF 2(s) near - 242 magnitudes and the uncertainties of the energy cor· kcal mol- t (see [1]1) is obtained jf one assumes !J.Hr [B eO(s)] is -I43.I kcal mol- I based on Cosgrove rections for the various constitue nts of the combus­ and Snyder's [2] study of the direct oxidation reaction. tion products are relatively larger fraction s of the An examination by Parker r3] of other values [4, 5, energy liberated by formation of BeF 2 than would 6, 7] for the heat of formation of BeO(s) suggests the be indicated by the degree of comple teness of co m­ above value may be too positive by approximately one bustion since 65 to 70 percent of the total energy or more kcal mol- I. The uncertainty in the heat of was due to the combustion ofPTFE. formation of HF(aq), a few tenths of a kilocalorie Failure to correct for the formation of Be2 C and the per mole, introduces a smaller though still signifi cant carbonaceous residue would have led to errors of effect. the order of 0.1 percent and 1 percent, respectively, -Direct combination of beryllium with fluorine was in the heat of formation of BeFz. Consequently, an undertaken to obtain a value for the heat of forma- accurate method for determining the amounts of Be2 C and the residue as well as unburned beryllium metal *This work was supported by the Ai ," Forc e Office of Scientifi c Research under Orde r No. OAB ISSA 65- 8 and the Advan ced Besea rch Projects Age ncy unde r Order No. 20- 60. was required, and its development constituted an I Figures in brac kets indicate ihe lil erature references at the end of this paper. important part of the experimental work. 281 2. Preliminary Combustion Experiments of the uncertaintles in the suppliers' analyses. An effort to obtain a check on the assay of metal from Attempts by other workers to burn beryllium foil measurements of the amount of hydrogen evolved on [8], powder [9], or rod [9] to completion in fluorine dissolving the powders in aqueous HF, done in con­ have been notably unsuccessful (in general, less than juction with other work performed in this laboratory 50% of the sample has burned). Similar difficulties [11], was only suggestive of the general accuracy of encountered with aluminum were overcome in this the impurity analysis in table 1, because the quantita­ laboratory by burning a pelleted mixture of aluminum tive technique for collection of hydrogen had not and polytetrafluoroethylene powders in 20 atm pres­ been fully worked out. sure of fluorine [10]. The applicability of this method PolytetraAuoroethylene (PTFE). The powder to combustion of beryllium was tested using metal was obtained as a commercial preparation desig­ powders with two sizes of particles. The first was a nated as TFE Fluorocarbon Resin, "Teflon 7". It was powder of 12 /-tm or finer particle size (passing 200 composed of irregularly shaped _particles with an mesh) and 98.9 percent purity, designated as type average size of 35 /-tm. Polytetrafluoroethylene film, BB; and the second was a powder of 25 /-tm or finer designated as FEP Fluorocarbon Resin film, of particle size (passing 100 mesh) and 99.7 percent 0.0025 cm thickness, was used to enclose the beryl­ purity, designated as type NM. lium-PTFE mixtures. Neither the film nor the powder Type NM metal powder in mixtures with ratios of was modified or specially treated before use. the weight of polytetrafluroethylene to weight of Fluorine. Two commercial preparations of fluorine beryllium ranging from 2 to 20 burned with- approxi­ were used, one of which was purified specially for mately the same percentage combustion, 75 to 90 the bomb calorimetry work. Samples were periodi­ percent. Spattering of beryllium metal onto the com­ cally analyzed by absorbing the fluorine in mercury bustion-bomb walls, formation of glassy (lump) and observing the residual pressure of the unreacted gases [16]. The residual gas was analyzed in a mass BeF2 , and corrosion of the holder were minimal when 0.1 g of metal was mixed with 1. 7 g of polymer. spectrometer. Typical analyses appear in table 2. Combustions of type BB beryllium powder in pellets The estimated uncertainties in the amounts of indi­ of the last mentioned composition were 99 to 100 vidual impurities include the uncertainty in our percent complete. measurement of the total mole percent as well as the uncertainties in the relative amounts of impuri­ Of several sample supports tested only nickel re­ ties that were estimated by the mass spectrometrist. sisted corrosion. Stainless steel and Monel reacted In the case of the purified fluorine a variation was ob­ with the beryllium in the pellet to varying degrees. served in oxygen content, which gave rise to differ­ Calcium fluoride disks tended to crack or melt. ing total impurities_ Data obtained during composi­ Both type BB and NM beryllium powders were tion analyzis definitely suggests that the major por­ burned in the preliminary combustion experiments and tion of SiF4 and its variability are due to the reac­ some calorimetric measurements were made with each. tion of fluorine with the glass walls of the gas analysis Only measurements made with the finer powder, bulbs. It may be that the oxygen arose in this or a type BB, were used in the final experiments because related process. the disadvantage of a lower sample purity in the case of the finer powder was largely offset by its higher completeness of conversion to BeF2 • On the basis 4. Calorimetric Apparatus of experience obtained in the preliminary combus­ tions, some changes in procedure and apparatus were Heat measurements were made with an isothermal­ made and are mentioned in the following sections. jacket, stirred-water calorimeter of the Dickinson A method of determining unburned beryllium ac­ design [17] as modified by Prosen and co-workers [18]. curate to 30 /-tg or better was required. An analysis One small change was made. The jacket and calorim­ based upon the reaction of beryllium metal with eter vessel stirrers were coupled by rubber O-rings concentrated KOH to give hydrogen fulfilled this and pulleys to individual motors mounted on an insu­ requirement and is summarized in section 9. lated bracket on the jacket wall to minimize heat transfer between the motors and calorimeter. The jacket-water temperature was held constant to 3. Materials ± 0.002 °C near a value of 31°C. The connections for the electrical leads between the calorimeter vessel Beryllium. The amounts and assumed states of and jacket were designed to insure good thermal the impurities of the two beryllium samples are given contact with the calorimeter jacket.
Recommended publications
  • Exposure Data
    BERYLLIUM AND BERYLLIUM eOMPOUNDS Beryllium and beryllium compounds were considered by previous Working Groups, In 1971,1979 and 1987 (lARe, 1972, 1980, 1987a). New data have since become available, and these are included in the present monograph and have been taken into consideration In the evaluation. The agents considered herein Include (a) metallic beryllium, (b) beryllium- aluminium and -copper alloys and (c) some beryllum compounds. 1. Exposure Data 1.1 Chemical and physical data and analysis 1.1.1 Synonyms, trade names and molecular formulae Synonyms, trade names and molecular formulae for beryllium, beryllum-aluminium and -copper alloys and certain beryllium compounds are presented in Thble 1. The list is not exhaustive, nor does it comprise necessarily the most commercially important beryllum- containing substances; rather, it indicates the range of beryllum compounds available. 1. 1.2 Chemical and physical properties of the pure substances Selected chemical and physical properties of beryllium, beryllum-aluminium and -copper alloys and the beryllium compounds covered in this monograph are presented in Thble 2. The French chemist Vauquelin discovered beryllium in 1798 as the oxide, while analysing emerald to prove an analogous composition (Newland, 1984). The metallc element was first isolated in independent experiments by Wöhler (1828) and Bussy (1828), who called it 'glucinium' owing to the sweet taste of its salts; that name is stil used in the French chemical literature. Wöhler's name 'beryllum' was offcially recognized by IUPAe in 1957 (WHO, 1990). The atomic weight and corn mon valence of beryllum were originally the subject of much controversy but were correctly predicted by Mendeleev to be 9 and + 2, respectively (Everest, 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Office
    Patented Mar. 12, 1940 2,193,364 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,193,364 PROCESS FOR OBTANING BEEY UMAND BERYLUMAL LOYS Carlo Adamoli, Milan, Italy, assignor to Perosa Corporation, Wilmington, Oel, a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application April 17, 1939, Serial No. 268,385. a tally June 6, 1936 16 Claims. (C. 5-84) The present application relates to a process ical method for the production of beryllium and for directly obtaining in a single operation start its alloys by treatment with a decomposing bi ing from halogenated compounds containing be valent metal such as magnesium, of a fluorine ryllium, beryllium as such or in the state of alloys containing compound of beryllium, that is a 5 with one or more alloyed elements capable of double fluoride of beryllium and an alkali metal 5 alloying with beryllium, and is a continuation-in (sodium) less rich in sodium fluoride than the part of my prior application Ser. No. 144,411 filed normal double fluoride BeFa2NaF. on May 24, 1937. The practical impossibility in fact has been In my said prior application, I have disclosed established which is met with in operating with 0 a process for directly obtaining in a single oper the normal double fluoride according to the re o ation beryllium or beryllium alloys starting from action: simple beryllium fluoride anhydrous and free or Substantially free from oxide. The present in which is rendered explosive by reason of the lib vention relates more particularly to a process eration of sodium and this is the reason in par s 5 of manufacture of beryllium or beryllium alloys ticular why instead of the normal double fluo starting from normal double fluoride of beryllium ride BeF2.2NaF the complex fluoride BeFa.NaF and an alkali-metal, the term “normal' being in is treated according to the reaction: tended to designate double fluorides containing ! 2BeFaNaF.--Mg-Be--MgF2--BeF2,2NaF two molecules of alkali fluoride for one molecule 20 of beryllium fluoride.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Fluoride Scale Prevention
    Tech Manual Excerpt Water Chemistry and Pretreatment Calcium Fluoride Scale Prevention Calcium Fluoride Fluoride levels in the feedwater of as low as 0.1 mg/L can create a scaling potential if Scale Prevention the calcium concentration is high. The calculation of the scaling potential is analogous to the procedure described in Calcium Sulfate Scale Prevention (Form No. 45-D01553-en) for CaSO4. Calculation 1. Calculate the ionic strength of the concentrate stream (Ic) following the procedure described in Scaling Calculations (Form No. 45-D01551-en): Eq. 1 2. Calculate the ion product (IPc) for CaF2 in the concentrate stream: Eq. 2 where: m 2+ 2+ ( Ca )f = M Ca in feed, mol/L m – – ( F )f = M F in feed, mol/L 3. Compare IPc for CaF2 with the solubility product (Ksp) of CaF2 at the ionic strength of the concentrate stream, Figure 2 /11/. If IPc ≥ Ksp, CaF2 scaling can occur, and adjustment is required. Adjustments for CaF2 Scale Control The adjustments discussed in Calcium Sulfate Scale Prevention (Form No. 45-D01553-en) for CaSO4 scale control apply as well for CaF2 scale control. Page 1 of 3 Form No. 45-D01556-en, Rev. 4 April 2020 Figure 1: Ksp for SrSO4 versus ionic strength /10/ Page 2 of 3 Form No. 45-D01556-en, Rev. 4 April 2020 Figure 2: Ksp for CaF2 versus ionic strength /11/ Excerpt from FilmTec™ Reverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual (Form No. 45-D01504-en), Chapter 2, "Water Chemistry and Pretreatment." Have a question? Contact us at: All information set forth herein is for informational purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment and Due Diligence Report (DRAFT)
    Environmental Impact Assessment and Due Diligence Report (DRAFT) Project Number: 47051-002 May 2015 PRC: Chemical Industry Energy Efficiency and Emissions Reduction Project Prepared by ChemChina and CHC for the Asian Development Bank. This is a version of the draft posted in May 2015 available on http://www.adb.org/Documents/RRPs/?id=47051-002-3. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 11 May 2015) Currency unit – yuan (CNY) CNY1.00 = $ 0.1633 $1.00 = CNY 6.1254 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AP – Affected Person API – American Petroleum Institute ASL – Above Sea Level CCPS – Center for Chemical Process Safety CEMS – Continuous Emissions Monitoring System ChemChina – China National Chemical Corporation CHC – China Haohua Company CHP – Combined Heat and Power CNY – Chinese Yuan CSEMP – Construction Site Environmental Management Plan DCS – Distributed Control System EA – Executing Agency EHS – Environment, Health and Safety EHSS – Environment, Health and Safety Specialist EHSU – Environment, Health and Safety Unit EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EMoP – Environmental Monitoring Plan EMP – Environmental Management Plan EMS – Environmental Monitoring Station EPB – Environmental Protection Bureau FSR – Feasibility Study Report Flor – Calcium fluoride (CaF2) or “fluorite” GDP – Gross Domestic Product GHG – Greenhouse Gas GIP – Good International Practice GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism HDP – High Density Polyethylene IA – Implementing Agency IEE – Initial Environmental Examination IT – Interim Target LIC – Loan Implementation Consultant
    [Show full text]
  • 68854 Federal Register / Vol
    68854 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 1999 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY H. Review Under Small Business as nuclear reactor moderators or Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of reflectors, and as nuclear reactor fuel 10 CFR Part 850 1996 element cladding. At DOE, beryllium Appendix A to the PreambleÐReferences operations have historically included Appendix B to the PreambleÐQuestions and [Docket No. EH±RM±98±BRYLM] Answers Concerning the Beryllium melting, casting, grinding, and machine Induced Lymphocyte Proliferation Test tooling of parts. (Be±LPT), Medical Records, and the Inhalation of beryllium dust or RIN 1901±AA75 Department of Energy (DOE) Beryllium particles can cause chronic beryllium disease (CBD) or beryllium Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Registry sensitization. CBD is a chronic, often Program I. Introduction debilitating, and sometimes fatal lung AGENCY: Office of Environment, Safety This final rule implements a chronic condition. Beryllium sensitization is a and Health, Department of Energy. beryllium disease prevention program condition in which a person's immune (CBDPP) for the Department of Energy system becomes highly responsive ACTION: Final rule. (DOE or the Department). This program (allergic) to the presence of beryllium in will reduce the number of workers the body. There has long been scientific SUMMARY: The Department of Energy currently exposed to beryllium at DOE consensus that exposure to airborne (DOE) is today publishing a final rule to facilities managed by
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning Optics
    GUIDE TO CLEANING OPTICS Crystal optics are more delicate than glass and should be treated carefully if they have to be cleaned. Some materials are very delicate, and should be treated with extra care. We describe the method, but the technique comes with practice. Handle optics by the edge and use lint-free nylon gloves. Use plastic protective gloves when cleaning with solvent but check that the solvent does not attack the glove. Clean optics as little as possible and only if absolutely necessary. Cleaning may create fine scratches which you cannot see easily but which may contribute to scattering, particularly in the UV. If the optic is mounted, try never to let solvent creep into the mounting ring. Use an air jet and no solvent at all for removal of dust. Very Delicate Materials: CsI, KRS5, Germanium, Zinc Selenide, Zinc Sulphide. These materials are soft, or are inclined to take marks (sleeks) or show up marks easily. They should be washed in a solvent such as methanol or propanol for light marking. Use an environmental friendly solvent such as NuSol Rapide (a replacement for trichloroethylene which is available in the UK) or otherwise acetone, for greasy or waxy contaminants. Soak the optic and wipe while wet with cotton wool (known as absorbent cotton in the USA) dipped in the solvent and let the optic dry by evaporation or assist it with airflow as it is wiped. Delicate Materials: Calcium Fluoride, Coated Materials, Magnesium Fluoride, Other fluorides, Silicon. These should be treated as above where practical, but it is often preferable to clean them carefully with a damp tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • SDS US 2945 Version #: 02 Revision Date: 03-17-2021 Issue Date: 01-21-2020 1 / 10 Precautionary Statement Prevention Obtain Special Instructions Before Use
    SAFETY DATA SHEET 1. Identification Product identifier Lithium Beryllium Fluoride Other means of identification SDS number M47 Synonyms FLiBe Manufacturer/Importer/Supplier/Distributor information Manufacturer Company name Materion Brush Inc. Address 6070 Parkland Boulevard Mayfield Heights, OH 44124 United States Telephone 1.800.862.4118 Website www.materion.com E-mail [email protected] Contact person Theodore Knudson Emergency phone number 1.800.862.4118 2. Hazard(s) identification Physical hazards Not classified. Health hazards Acute toxicity, oral Category 3 Acute toxicity, inhalation Category 2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2 Sensitization, skin Category 1 Carcinogenicity Category 1B Specific target organ toxicity, single exposure Category 3 respiratory tract irritation Specific target organ toxicity, repeated Category 1 exposure Environmental hazards Hazardous to the aquatic environment, Category 2 long-term hazard OSHA defined hazards Not classified. Label elements Signal word Danger Hazard statement Toxic if swallowed. Causes skin irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. Causes serious eye irritation. Fatal if inhaled. May cause respiratory irritation. May cause cancer. Causes damage to organs (respiratory system) through prolonged or repeated exposure by inhalation. Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. Material name: Lithium Beryllium Fluoride SDS US 2945 Version #: 02 Revision date: 03-17-2021 Issue date: 01-21-2020 1 / 10 Precautionary statement Prevention Obtain special instructions before use. Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. Do not breathe dust. Wash thoroughly after handling. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Temperature Aqueous Solubility of Fluorite at Temperatures of 5, 25, and 50 Oc and Ionic Strengths up to 0.72M
    LOW TEMPERATURE AQUEOUS SOLUBILITY OF FLUORITE AT TEMPERATURES OF 5, 25, AND 50 OC AND IONIC STRENGTHS UP TO 0.72M by Richard L. Henry A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geochemistry) Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ______________________________ Richard L. Henry Signed: ______________________________ Dr. Wendy J. Harrison Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ______________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Historical fluorite solubility research found that fluorite solubilities varied over three orders-of-magnitude and appear to be inconsistent with several recently determined fluorite solubilities. This research involved a comprehensive series of solubility experiments run over a period of three years using nine natural fluorites and one synthetic fluorite to determine their solubility in low temperature (5, 25, and 50oC) aqueous solutions and ionic strengths ranging from near zero to 0.72M. Equilibrium was approached from both undersaturated and supersaturated initial conditions. The fluorites were chemically and physically characterized using laboratory analyses, thin section petrography, UV fluorescence, and x-ray diffraction. The fluorite samples were generally found to have similar chemical and physical properties. The chemical composition was approximately stoichiometric, with a mean calcium concentration of 51.6 ± 0.6 wt % and mean fluorine concentration of 50.2 ± 0.7 wt %. Fluorite unit cell edge lengths, volumes, and densities averaged 5.4630 ± 0.0007 Å, 163.04 ± 0.06 Å3, and 3.181 ± 0.009 g/cm3, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantify Sodium Fluoride / Beryllium Fluoride Salt Properties for a Liquid Fueled Fluoride Molten Salt Reactor
    ANL/CFCT-C2018-18168 Quantify Sodium Fluoride / Beryllium Fluoride Salt Properties for a Liquid Fueled Fluoride Molten Salt Reactor Final CRADA Report Chemical and Fuel Cycle Technologies About Argonne National Laboratory Argonne is a U.S. Department of Energy laboratory managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. The Laboratory’s main facility is outside Chicago, at 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439. For information about Argonne and its pioneering science and technology programs, see www.anl.gov. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Online Access: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free at OSTI.GOV (http://www.osti.gov/), a service of the U.S. Dept. of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information Reports not in digital format may be purchased by the public from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS): U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Rd Alexandria, VA 22312 www.ntis.gov Phone: (800) 553-NTIS (6847) or (703) 605-6000 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Email: [email protected] Reports not in digital format are available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI): U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 www.osti.gov Phone: (865) 576-8401 Fax: (865) 576-5728 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor UChicago Argonne, LLC, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Export Control Handbook for Chemicals
    Export Control Handbook for Chemicals -Dual-use control list -Common Military List -Explosives precursors -Syria restrictive list -Psychotropics and narcotics precursors ARNES-NOVAU, X 2019 EUR 29879 This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Xavier Arnés-Novau Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332-785421 Filippo Sevini Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332-786793 EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC 117839 EUR 29879 Print ISBN 978-92-76-11971-5 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/844026 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-11970-8 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/339232 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Atomic Energy Community, 2019 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Names and CAS Numbers Final
    Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number C3H8O 1‐propanol C4H7BrO2 2‐bromobutyric acid 80‐58‐0 GeH3COOH 2‐germaacetic acid C4H10 2‐methylpropane 75‐28‐5 C3H8O 2‐propanol 67‐63‐0 C6H10O3 4‐acetylbutyric acid 448671 C4H7BrO2 4‐bromobutyric acid 2623‐87‐2 CH3CHO acetaldehyde CH3CONH2 acetamide C8H9NO2 acetaminophen 103‐90‐2 − C2H3O2 acetate ion − CH3COO acetate ion C2H4O2 acetic acid 64‐19‐7 CH3COOH acetic acid (CH3)2CO acetone CH3COCl acetyl chloride C2H2 acetylene 74‐86‐2 HCCH acetylene C9H8O4 acetylsalicylic acid 50‐78‐2 H2C(CH)CN acrylonitrile C3H7NO2 Ala C3H7NO2 alanine 56‐41‐7 NaAlSi3O3 albite AlSb aluminium antimonide 25152‐52‐7 AlAs aluminium arsenide 22831‐42‐1 AlBO2 aluminium borate 61279‐70‐7 AlBO aluminium boron oxide 12041‐48‐4 AlBr3 aluminium bromide 7727‐15‐3 AlBr3•6H2O aluminium bromide hexahydrate 2149397 AlCl4Cs aluminium caesium tetrachloride 17992‐03‐9 AlCl3 aluminium chloride (anhydrous) 7446‐70‐0 AlCl3•6H2O aluminium chloride hexahydrate 7784‐13‐6 AlClO aluminium chloride oxide 13596‐11‐7 AlB2 aluminium diboride 12041‐50‐8 AlF2 aluminium difluoride 13569‐23‐8 AlF2O aluminium difluoride oxide 38344‐66‐0 AlB12 aluminium dodecaboride 12041‐54‐2 Al2F6 aluminium fluoride 17949‐86‐9 AlF3 aluminium fluoride 7784‐18‐1 Al(CHO2)3 aluminium formate 7360‐53‐4 1 of 75 Chemical Abstract Chemical Formula Chemical Name Service (CAS) Number Al(OH)3 aluminium hydroxide 21645‐51‐2 Al2I6 aluminium iodide 18898‐35‐6 AlI3 aluminium iodide 7784‐23‐8 AlBr aluminium monobromide 22359‐97‐3 AlCl aluminium monochloride
    [Show full text]
  • EPDM & FKM Chemical Resistance Guide
    EPDM & FKM Chemical Resistance Guide FIRST EDITION EPDM & FKM CHEMICAL RESISTANCE GUIDE Elastomers: Ethylene Propylene (EPDM) Fluorocarbon (FKM) Chemical Resistance Guide Ethylene Propylene (EPDM) & Fluorocarbon (FKM) 1st Edition © 2019 by IPEX. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without prior written permission. For information contact: IPEX, Marketing, 1425 North Service Road East, Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6H 1A7 ABOUT IPEX At IPEX, we have been manufacturing non-metallic pipe and fittings since 1951. We formulate our own compounds and maintain strict quality control during production. Our products are made available for customers thanks to a network of regional stocking locations from coast-to-coast. We offer a wide variety of systems including complete lines of piping, fittings, valves and custom-fabricated items. More importantly, we are committed to meeting our customers’ needs. As a leader in the plastic piping industry, IPEX continually develops new products, modernizes manufacturing facilities and acquires innovative process technology. In addition, our staff take pride in their work, making available to customers their extensive thermoplastic knowledge and field experience. IPEX personnel are committed to improving the safety, reliability and performance of thermoplastic materials. We are involved in several standards committees and are members of and/or comply with the organizations listed on this page. For specific details about any IPEX product, contact our customer service department. INTRODUCTION Elastomers have outstanding resistance to a wide range of chemical reagents. Selecting the correct elastomer for an application will depend on the chemical resistance, temperature and mechanical properties needed. Resistance is a function both of temperatures and concentration, and there are many reagents which can be handled for limited temperature ranges and concentrations.
    [Show full text]