DOCSLIB.ORG

NON CONFIDENTIAL VERSION COL - State Aid - Iceland - Aid to Farice Ehf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NON CONFIDENTIAL VERSION COL - State Aid - Iceland - Aid to Farice Ehf Brussels, 26 March 2021 Case No: 86598 Document No: 1200352 Decision No 023/21/COL [Non-confidential version] [The information in square brackets is covered by the obligation of professional secrecy] Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs Arnarhvoli 101 Reykjavík Iceland Subject: Aid to Farice ehf. for investment in a third submarine cable 1 Summary (1) The EFTA Surveillance Authority (“ESA”) wishes to inform Iceland that, having assessed the aid to Farice ehf. for investment in a third submarine cable (“the measure”), it considers that the measure constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement and decides not to raise objections1 to the measure, as it is compatible with the functioning of the EEA Agreement, pursuant to its Article 61(3)(c). ESA has based its decision on the following considerations. 2 Procedure (2) The Icelandic authorities notified the measure on 23 March 2021.2 3 Description of the measure 3.1 Factual background (3) Iceland is among the world’s most digitalised countries and reliance on international telecommunications connectivity is a critical component for most sectors of Icelandic society. (4) Farice ehf. (“Farice”) currently operates the two submarine cables running from Iceland to Europe, FARICE-1 and DANICE. FARICE-1 runs from Seyðisfjörður, on the east coast of Iceland, and lands in Scotland, with a branch unit into the Faroe Islands. DANICE runs from Landeyjarsandur, on the south coast of Iceland, and lands in Denmark. The routes of FARICE-1 and DANICE, the only submarine cables running from Iceland to Europe, intersect in the Atlantic Ocean. A third submarine cable, Greenland Connect, runs from Iceland to Canada (see Section 3.2.2). (5) FARICE-1 was laid in 2003 and put into commercial operation in 2004. The Icelandic Government participated in the financing of the project by: (a) granting a state guarantee in the amount of EUR 9.4 million; and (b) providing a capital injection in the amount of EUR 13 million. In July 2006, ESA concluded that these measures constituted compatible state aid.3 1 Reference is made to Article 4(3) of the Part II of Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice. 2 Documents No 1189996, 1190000 and 1190159, and attachments, Documents No 1189980, 1189982, 1189986, 1189988, 1189990, 1189992, 1189994, 1190002, 1190004 and 1190006. 3 See ESA’s Decision No 227/06/COL State aid in favour of Farice hf. Rue Belliard 35, B-1040 Brussels, tel: +32 2 286 18 11, www.eftasurv.int Page 2 (6) Preparations for the second cable, DANICE, commenced in 2007. At the time, Farice was jointly owned by Icelandic telecommunications operators and the Icelandic Government. The construction of DANICE was funded on market terms.4 DANICE was put into commercial operation in 2009. (7) Farice entered into severe financial difficulties in 2008 as a result of the financial crisis and the devaluation of the Icelandic currency. From 2010 to 2012, the Icelandic authorities initiated measures for the restructuring of Farice. These measures included a capital increase, debt conversion and a state guarantee. In addition, Farice and the Icelandic authorities entered into a public service contract whereby the Icelandic authorities provided Farice with funding to support the operations of the company. On 19 July 2013, ESA issued a comfort letter to Iceland regarding the public service contract.5 (8) On 23 February 2021, ESA received a complaint from Sýn ehf. (“Vodafone Iceland”) regarding Farice.6 In its complaint, Vodafone Iceland alleges that Farice has received public service compensation from the Icelandic authorities in violation of SGEI rules,7 including compensation for costs related to surveys conducted in preparation for a possible third submarine cable. At the date of this decision, the complaint case remains open. 3.2 Policy background and current vulnerabilities of international connections 3.2.1 Iceland’s Telecommunications Policy (9) On 3 June 2019, the Icelandic Parliament adopted a parliamentary resolution approving the Government’s telecommunications policy for the years 2019–2033 (“the Telecommunications Policy”).8 (10) The objectives of the Telecommunications Policy are, inter alia, to promote accessible and effective communications and to guarantee the security of telecommunication infrastructures. (11) To achieve those objectives, the Telecommunications Policy emphasises that three active submarine telecommunications cables shall connect Iceland with Europe from different landing sites. As a geographically remote country, effective international connections are a prerequisite for the development of Iceland as a modern technology-based society. A substantial part of IT systems in use in Iceland today are hosted in data centres outside of Iceland. A serious disruption in international connectivity would cause major damage to the Icelandic economy and society as a whole. (12) According to a risk assessment produced by Farice, the main vulnerabilities of the current international connections network relate to human error, malfunctions, accidents, natural disasters and other unforeseen events.9 Furthermore, the lengths of the submarine cables increase the probability of incidents compared to shorter cables going from Scandinavia and the UK to mainland Europe. Moreover, 4 See ESA‘s Decision No 787/08/COL regarding the DANICE project. 5 See, ESA comfort letter of 19 July 2013. 6 Document No 1182556. 7 “SGEI” stands for “Services of General Economic Interest”. 8 https://www.althingi.is/altext/pdf/149/s/1688.pdf. 9 See Document No 1190004. Page 3 other countries in the EEA are connected to major international network connection points via a diversified network of multiple land and/or submarine cables while Iceland is dependent on only two submarine cables. 3.2.2 Greenland Connect submarine cable (13) A third submarine cable, Greenland Connect, owned and operated by Tele Greenland, terminates in Iceland and its traffic is directed through Danice and FARICE-1 on the way to Europe. It is possible to buy services to mainland Canada, and from there to New York, from Tele Greenland. However, the Icelandic authorities consider that Greenland Connect does not meet the requirements for serving as a backup for Iceland.10 (14) In this context, for a cable to provide additional security it needs to have a separate risk profile from existing cables. As Greenland Connect shares a landing station and the route out from Iceland with DANICE, it does not meet the required criteria of a backup cable. In addition, the marine route of the cable has proven to be faulty with long periods of outage. In December 2018, Greenland Connect experienced a fault that lasted until August 2019. Also prior to that, Greenland Connect had experienced multiple faults. (15) Moreover, one of the more serious risk factors that needs to be mitigated with a backup cable is the need for the network to withstand flooding from a large volcanic eruption of the Katla volcano that is situated close to the landing site of DANICE and Greenland Connect. A severe flooding that would cause harm to the landing station or cables close to the mountain would cause fault in both DANICE and Greenland Connect at the same time. For these reasons, the Icelandic authorities do not consider Greenland Connect to meet the requirements needed to secure international connections to Iceland. 3.2.3 Current vulnerabilities of international connections (16) According to the Icelandic authorities, the current risks relating to possible malfunctions to international connections have been analysed in a statistical model taking into account the probability of a total outage, meaning an outage of both paths simultaneously during a 10-year period, and the proportional projected availability. Simultaneous interruptions of the submarine cables would be the worst case scenario and the single most critical risk factor. The expected11 theoretical availability of both cables as one system is 99.96% and therefore the probability of one outage during a 10-year period is 12%.12 A simultaneous outage of both cables has an expected duration of about 10 days, meaning no international service would be provided by Farice to Iceland during that period. The calculations above only model pure submarine failures. Other threats on-land increase the outage probability. (17) Furthermore, there are permanent risk factors that could disrupt the international connection network. The most realistic risk factors are disruptions caused by 10 The requirements for increased security in international connectivity by a third cable are based on the objectives of the Icelandic authorities in its Telecommunications Policy. 11 Based on international statistics of submarine cable where Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) is 3 years and assumed repair time (MTTR) of 3 weeks per cable. 12 Based on exponential distribution: p(failure during a period T) = 1 - P(no failure) = 1- e-(T/MTBF), where T = 10 years, e=2.71 and MTBF is the Mean Time Between Failures for the system in years. Page 4 human error, e.g. mistakes and disruptions caused by fishing vessels or other man-made objects in the ocean. Should a fishing vessel cause a submarine cable to break, the repair time will be counted in weeks, or months should the break occur during wintertime, as the repair vessels require favourable weather conditions to operate. During such a period, Iceland would only be connected to Europe via a single submarine cable, where a simple land connection failure will cause a full network outage. (18) Moreover, there are several natural events that could jeopardise the security of FARICE-1 and related terrestrial routes. Mainly, there is a possibility of flooding in the Skeiðará river in south Iceland which could rupture the southern path of the terrestrial cables of FARICE-1 causing outage for weeks. This would result in the disconnection of a large part of FARICE-1 as traffic cannot be re-routed to the northern path within a short timeframe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary
    Executive summary For more information, visit: www.vodafone.com/investor Highlights Group highlights for the 2010 financial year Revenue Financial highlights ■ Total revenue of £44.5 billion, up 8.4%, with improving trends in most £44.5bn markets through the year. 8.4% growth ■ Adjusted operating profit of £11.5 billion, a 2.5% decrease in a recessionary environment. ■ Data revenue exceeded £4 billion for the first time and is now 10% Adjusted operating profit of service revenue. ■ £1 billion cost reduction programme delivered a year ahead of schedule; £11.5bn further £1 billion programme now underway. 2.5% decrease ■ Final dividend per share of 5.65 pence, resulting in a total for the year of 8.31 pence, up 7%. ■ Higher dividends supported by £7.2 billion of free cash flow, an increase Free cash flow of 26.5%. £7.2bn Operational highlights 26.5% growth ■ We are one of the world’s largest mobile communications companies by revenue with 341.1 million proportionate mobile customers, up 12.7% during the year. Proportionate mobile customers ■ Improved performance in emerging markets with increasing revenue market share in India, Turkey and South Africa during the year. ■ Expanded fixed broadband customer base to 5.6 million, up 1 million 341.1m during the year. 12.7% growth ■ Comprehensive smartphone range, including the iPhone, BlackBerry® Bold and Samsung H1. ■ Launch of Vodafone 360, a new internet service for the mobile and internet. ■ High speed mobile broadband network with peak speeds of up to 28.8 Mbps. Vodafone Group Plc Annual Report 2010 1 Sir John Bond Chairman Chairman’s statement Your Company continues to deliver strong cash generation, is well positioned to benefit from economic recovery and looks to the future with confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Communication, and Politics in the Nordic Countries
    POWER, COMMUNICATION, AND POLITICS IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES POWER, COMMUNICATION, POWER, COMMUNICATION, AND POLITICS IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES The Nordic countries are stable democracies with solid infrastructures for political dia- logue and negotiations. However, both the “Nordic model” and Nordic media systems are under pressure as the conditions for political communication change – not least due to weakened political parties and the widespread use of digital communication media. In this anthology, the similarities and differences in political communication across the Nordic countries are studied. Traditional corporatist mechanisms in the Nordic countries are increasingly challenged by professionals, such as lobbyists, a development that has consequences for the processes and forms of political communication. Populist polit- ical parties have increased their media presence and political influence, whereas the news media have lost readers, viewers, listeners, and advertisers. These developments influence societal power relations and restructure the ways in which political actors • Edited by: Eli Skogerbø, Øyvind Ihlen, Nete Nørgaard Kristensen, & Lars Nord • Edited by: Eli Skogerbø, Øyvind Ihlen, Nete Nørgaard communicate about political issues. This book is a key reference for all who are interested in current trends and develop- ments in the Nordic countries. The editors, Eli Skogerbø, Øyvind Ihlen, Nete Nørgaard Kristensen, and Lars Nord, have published extensively on political communication, and the authors are all scholars based in the Nordic countries with specialist knowledge in their fields. Power, Communication, and Politics in the Nordic Nordicom is a centre for Nordic media research at the University of Gothenburg, Nordicomsupported is a bycentre the Nordic for CouncilNordic of mediaMinisters. research at the University of Gothenburg, supported by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCTIC BROADBAND Recommendations for an Interconnected Arctic
    ARCTIC BROADBAND Recommendations for an Interconnected Arctic Telecommunications Infrastructure Working Group Table of Contents ` AEC Chair Messages . .2 Message from AEC chair, Tara Sweeney ` Executive Summary . .3 I am incredibly proud of the hard work and dedication demonstrated by the ` I . Introduction . .5 members of the Telecommunications Infrastructure Working group. The pan-Arctic engagement evident throughout this document exhibits the strong commitment of ` II . Key Issues . .6 the Arctic business community to support the Arctic Economic Council’s four core principles of partnership, collaboration, innovation and peace. ` III . The Current State of Broadband in the Arctic . .14 Being raised in rural Alaska, I have a deep understanding for the importance of ` IV . Funding Options . .19 connectivity and the challenges that come with a lack of reliable communications. ` V . Past, Current and Proposed Projects . 22. Expanding broadband access and adoption will be vital for the economic, social and political growth of local Arctic communities. It is my hope that these ` VI . Goals and Recommendations . .27 recommendations add value to the ongoing discussion of broadband deployment ` VII . Conclusion . 30. in the Arctic, and serve as a tool for policy makers, investors, researchers and communities to come together for sustainable polar growth. ` AEC Telecommunications Infrastructure Working Groups . 31. ` Citations . .37 Message from AEC Telecommunications Infrastructure Working Group chair, Robert McDowell The recommendations provided in this report are the result of a true collaborative effort among the business community within the eight Arctic states. Together, local Arctic residents and expert broadband advisors have combined their knowledge to establish a comprehensive strategy for the deployment and adoption of broadband in the far north – a first of its kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Customized Area of Territory – RP126 – Sim Services
    Area of Territory – RP126 Page 1 (3) Version D rel01, 2012-11-21 Appendix 2 Agreement no: M11042701 Customized Area of Territory – RP126 – Sim Services Country Operator Brand GPR S Price Grou p ALAND, FINLAND Alands Mobiltelefon AMT ALBANIA Vodafone Albania Vodafone AUSTRALIA Telstra Corporation Limited Telstra AUSTRALIA Vodafone Network Pty Ltd Vodafone AUSTRIA A1 Telekom Austria AG A1 AUSTRIA Orange Austria Orange Telecommunication GmbH AUSTRIA T-Mobile Austria GmbH T-mobile BELARUS FE “Velcom” Velcom (MDC) BELGIUM Belgacom SA/NV Belgacom (former Proximus) BELGIUM BASE (KPN Orange Belgium) BASE BELGIUM Mobistar S.A. Mobistar BULGARIA Mobiltel M-tel CHINA, PEOPLES REP. China Mobile China Mobile CHINA, PEOPLES REP. China Unicom China Unicom CROATIA Croatian Telecom Inc. Croatian Telecom (former T-Mobile) CYPRUS MTN Cyprus Ltd (Areeba) MTN CYPRUS Cyprus Telecommunications Cytamobile- Vodafone CZECH REPUBLIC Telefónica O2 (EuroTel) Telefónica O2 CZECH REPUBLIC T-Mobile Czech Rep T-mobile CZECH REPUBLIC Vodafone Czech Rep Vodafone DENMARK TDC TDC DENMARK Telenor Denmark Telenor EGYPT Etisalat Misr Etisalat EGYPT Vodafone Egypt Vodafone ESTONIA Elisa Eesti Elisa ESTONIA Estonian Mobile Telephone EMT ESTONIA Tele2 Eesti Tele2 FAROE ISLANDS, THE Faroese Telecom Faroese Telecom FINLAND DNA Finland (fd Networks DNA (Finnet) FINLAND Elisa Finland Elisa FINLAND TeliaSonera Finland TeliaSonera FRANCE Bouygues Telecom Bouygues FRANCE Orange (France Telecom) Orange FRANCE Vivendi SFR Area of Territory – RP126 Page 2 (3) Version D rel01, 2012-11-21 GERMANY E-Plus Mobilfunk E-plus GERMANY Telefonica O2 Germany O2 GERMANY Telekom Deutschland GmbH Telekom (former T-mobile) Deutschland GERMANY Vodafone D2 Vodafone GREECE Vodafone Greece (Panafon) Vodafone GREECE Wind Hellas Wind Telecommunications HUNGARY Pannon GSM Távközlési Pannon HUNGARY Vodafone Hungary Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastlines Are Reproduced Using GEBCO Digital Atlas, Centenary Edition 2003
    Subsea Cables UK is an industry organisation with the aim of promoting marine safety, safeguarding submarine cables and encouraging excellent practice within the industry. Subsea Cables UK does not broadly differentiate between the Communications, Power and Renewable industry cables as their impact on other seabed stakeholders is so similar. Subsea Cables UK is interested in any cables which land or pass through UK waters including the Exclusive Economic Zone. SOUTH WEST APPROACHES Kingfisher Awareness Chart Kilmore! New Quay! 13°W 30' 12°W 30' 11°W 30' 10°W 30' IRELAN9D°! W 30' 8°W 30' 7°W 30' 6°W 30' 5°W 30' 4°W 30' 3°W C U ! E K L - T I ! I R 52°N C 52°N E Fishguard ( L O A Cork O N REPUBLIC OF IRELAND ! S D ) Saltees Ground + C ! 4 R St. David's 4 O ( 0 S ) S ¥ 8 WALES 4 I ! 5 N 7 G 5 5 2 5 9 + 9 4 Kinsale 9 4 Milford! Haven ! ( 0 ) 2 0 8 Swansea 5 ! Ballycotton Ground 1 Dursey Island ! 0 Turbot Bank 3 1 Our aim is to optimise coexistence and minimise any hazards 1 Oxwich 9 ! P NYMPHE 0 T 520 + A 7 674 30' 4 T 0)20 ! 30' 4 +44( ( IR S Cardiff 0 OLA ) I S 2 S Marine Safety 0 H 7 B Kinsale Head Grounds 6 R S 7 W 4 A BANK 5 N AN 2 C S 0 H E 0 00 The Smalls Ground A/ 452 BR 7 67 EA (0)20 N +4 +44 4(0 ) 0 g 2 207 67452 0 H Se 5200 RT 674 U + O 7 K I N )20 AL (0 G 4 - N 44 U I I + T 4 R M AT OR E T P ( E E P - S K 0 G U L ! E ) P A A O 2 N Lundy Island UR 98 T .E 2 0 6 D W 6 8 A 2 1 T 9 TA 8 C 00 + 5 54 08 R 1 06 0 4 caused by the installation or presence of submarine cables to other sea bed users.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1334 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1334 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) International Comparison Requirements Pursuant ) IB Docket No. 10-171 to the Broadband Data Improvement Act ) GN Docket 11-121 ) International Broadband Data Report ) THIRD REPORT Adopted: August 13, 2012 Released: August 21, 2012 By the Chief, International Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is the Commission’s third annual International Broadband Data Report (IBDR or Report). The IBDR is required by the Broadband Data Improvement Act (BDIA) and provides comparative international information on broadband services.1 Through the presentation of this data, we have the opportunity to evaluate the United States’ rates of broadband adoption, speeds, and prices in comparison to the international community. International data can serve as useful benchmarks for progress in fixed and mobile broadband accessibility. 2. In the past year, both fixed and mobile broadband providers have made significant progress in their efforts to expand broadband networks and improve service quality. As noted in the Eighth 706 Report released today, the market is responding to the needs of Americans for increased broadband capabilities.2 In 2011, U.S. investment in wired and wireless network infrastructure rose 24%.3 Some recent trends show that providers are offering higher speeds, more data under their usage limits, and more advanced technology in both fixed and mobile broadband. For example, cable operators have increased their deployment of DOCSIS 3.0-based data networks, which are capable of providing 100 megabits per second or faster (Mbps) speeds. In the last three years, the percentage of households passed by DOCSIS 3.0 broadband infrastructure has risen from 20% to 82%.4 Advances in broadband technology and initiatives to promote greater deployment and adoption of broadband services have led to broadband- enabled innovation in other fields such as health care, education, and energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • International Data Connectivity in Iceland a White Paper
    International Data Connectivity in Iceland A White Paper 1 DATA CONNECTIVITY WHITE PAPER REPORT 2016 Iceland as a prime location for data centers The data connectivity aspect Since obtaining the first international data connec- This paper also focuses on backhaul quality, and shows tion in 1906, Iceland has come a long way as a prime data connectivity possibilities in Iceland. The paper location for data centers. Fast forward to 2015, and concludes with an overview of the different services connectivity coupled with a competitive environment and data connectivity solutions that providers offer for data center businesses are now important reasons the data center industry in Iceland. why Iceland is one of the highest ranked countries worldwide when it comes to digital competitiveness1. The Fiber Network Great connectivity is also a key reason that Cushman Some of the most important reasons why businesses & Wakefield ranked Iceland the safest location for choose Iceland for their data center needs is a globally data centers in their 2016 Data Center Risk Index2. competitive TCO, security of power supply and minimal data connectivity risk. One of the most important factors that characterizes favorable data center locations worldwide is the The fiber network consists of reliable backhaul in quality of onshore and offshore fiber infrastructure Iceland and a redundant submarine cable network and competitiveness of telecommunication service that delivers data securely and efficiently across the providers. These factors minimize risk for data center Atlantic, between the US, Europe, and Iceland. businesses and provide opportunities for companies to optimize operations and expand them into the future. Submarine Cables Data center connectivity from Iceland to the rest of the world is provided by undersea transatlantic cables, one Competitive Connectivity between Iceland and Greenland, which then links to in Iceland North America, another, called FARICE-1, that links Iceland to the U.K., and a third, DANICE, that runs • Redundant between Iceland and Denmark [Figure 1].
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-2010-2011-LOG.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com 4 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 September 21 , 2012 John Greenewald, Jr. Re: FOIA Control No. : 2012-483 Dear Mr. Greenewald: On September 14, 2012, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission" or "FCC") received your request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FO lA") for "a copy of the FO lA case log for the calendar year 201 0 and 2011." As you requested, enclosed is a copy of the FOIA Logs. We are required by both the Freedom of Information Act and the Commission's rules to charge requesters certain fees associated with the costs of searching for, reviewing, and duplicating the sought after information. 1 To calculate the appropriate fee, requesters are classified as one of: (1) commercial use requesters; (2) educational requesters, non-commercial scientific organizations, or representatives of the news media; or (3) all other requesters.2 Based on your classification as a member of the "news media," no duplication cost was associated with processing your request. If you believe this to be a denial of your request, you may file an application for review with the FCC's Office of General Counsel within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU-Dstudygroups
    ITU-D Study Groups Study period 2018-2021 Broadband development and connectivity solutions for rural and Question 5/1 Telecommunications/ remote areas ICTs for rural and remote areas Executive summary This annual deliverable reviews major backbone telecommunication Annual deliverable infrastructure installation efforts and approaches to last-mile connectivity, 2019-2020 describes current trends in last-mile connectivity and policy interventions and recommended last-mile technologies for use in rural and remote areas, as well as in small island developing States (SIDS). Discussions and contributions made during a workshop on broadband development in rural areas, held in September 2019, have been included in this document, which concludes with two sets of high-level recommendations for regulators and policy-makers, and for operators to use as guidelines for connecting rural and remote communities. 1 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 3 Trends in telecommunication/ICT backbone infrastructure 4 Last mile-connectivity 5 Trends in last-mile connectivity 6 Business regulatory models and policies 7 Recommendations and guidelines for regulators and policy-makers 8 Recommendations and guidelines for operators 9 Annex 1: Map of the global submarine cable network 11 Annex 2: Listing of submarine cables (A-Y) 12 2 More information on ITU-D study groups: E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +41 22 730 5999 Web: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/study-groups ITU -D Study Groups Introduction The telecommunications/ICT sector and technologies have evolved over a long period of time, starting with ancient communication systems such as drum beating and smoke signals to the electric telegraph, the fixed telephone, radio and television, transistors, video telephony and satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodafone Group Plc Plc Vodafone Group
    Vodafone Group Plc Group Vodafone Plc Registered Office Vodafone Group Plc Vodafone House The Connection Annual Report Newbury Berkshire For the year ended 31 March 2010 RG14 2FN England Registered in England No. 1833679 Tel: +44 (0) 1635 33251 2010 March 31 ended year the Report for Annual Fax: +44 (0) 1635 45713 www.vodafone.com We are one of the world’s largest Contact details mobile communications companies Investor Relations by revenue, operating across the Telephone: +44 (0) 1635 33251 globe providing a wide range of Media Relations communications services. Our vision Telephone: +44 (0) 1635 664444 is to be the communications leader Corporate Responsibility in an increasingly connected world. Fax: +44 (0) 1635 674478 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.vodafone.com/responsibility This constitutes the annual report of Vodafone Group Plc (the ‘Company’) for the year Contents ended 31 March 2010 and is dated 18 May 2010. The content of the Group’s website (www.vodafone.com) should not be considered to form part of this annual report or the Executive summary# Company’s annual report on Form 20-F. 1 Highlights 2 Chairman’s statement In the discussion of the Group’s reported financial position, operating results and cash flow 4 Telecommunications industry for the year ended 31 March 2010, information is presented to provide readers with additional financial information that is regularly reviewed by management. However this 6 Chief Executive’s review additional information is not uniformly defined by all companies, including those in the 10 Global presence Group’s industry. Accordingly, it may not be comparable with similarly titled measures and # disclosures by other companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Infrastructures De Télécommunications
    2 L’Ambition dede se surpAsser seQue ce soit pour surp l’industrie manufacturière, laA santé, ousser l’éducation, le réseau routier est sans contredit le chemin qui nous assure et nous mène vers une vie meilleure. Que ce soit pour l’industrie manufacturière, la santé, ou l’éducation, le réseau routier estVoici sans les contreditraisons pour le chemin lesquelles qui McAsphaltnous assure est et le nous spécialiste mène vers des uneproduits vie meilleure. asphaltiques avec l’ambition de se surpasser. Leader et expert dans son industrie depuis plus de Voici les raisons pour lesquelles McAsphalt est le spécialiste des produits asphaltiques 40 ans, nous avons développé un excellent partenariat et une confiance indéniable auprès avec l’ambition de se surpasser. Leader et expert dans son industrie depuis plus de de tous nos clients. Grâce à l’ingénierie de produits d’asphalte innovateurs pour toutes 40 ans, nous avons développé un excellent partenariat et une confiance indéniable auprès les applications et même les conditions les plus extrêmes, nous assurons une livraison de tous nos clients. Grâce à l’ingénierie de produits d’asphalte innovateurs pour toutes garantie et sans compromis. les applications et même les conditions les plus extrêmes, nous assurons une livraison garantieQue ce soit et poursans lacompromis. R & D, la formation ou le support technique, notre engagement dans l’industrie d’asphalte est une contribution essentielle au développement de l’économie canadienne. 6421276 Que ce soit pour la R & D, la formation ou le support technique, notre engagement dans l’industrie CONSTAS / NUMÉRO 35 / AVRIL 2016 d’asphalteVisitez notre est site une web contribution mcasphalt.com essentielle et découvrez au développement ce que nous de pouvons l’économie faire cpouranadienne.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Cables: Bringing Broadband Internet to the Arctic, a Life Changer for Northerners?
    Briefing Note Submarine Cables: Bringing Broadband Internet to the Arctic, a Life Changer for Northerners? Michael Delaunay The internet has already changed the lives of billions of people all over the planet and still continues to do so. But in order to fully benefit from what the internet can offer, a broadband connection is essential. In the Arctic this is not yet the case. A large portion of the Arctic region suffers from a bad connection. There exists a significant digital gap between the northern and the southern region of the Arctic countries. For the majority of the inhabitants of the Arctic regions, internet is very expensive, but not only that; it offers a low bandwidth and a low data cap. This is particularly the case in Nunavut where Inuit rely on only one way to connect: via satellite. Other regions can be connected via micro wave or terrestrial fiber optic cables, but not all of them. Even if the satellite and microwave connect the northerners to the rest of the World, these technologies are likely to suffer due to the harsh environment (ice, snow storms, electromagnetic storms) that can disrupt, and even cut off completely, the only way to communicate for some of the Indigenous communities. Submarine cables for now seem to be the most reliable, fastest and cheapest option in the long term to connect most of the communities to broadband internet, even in the Arctic. While most of the Arctic communities are settled on shores in the North American Arctic, especially in Canada, the option of laying submarine fibre optic cables to connect them to broadband internet might be a solution.
    [Show full text]