DOCSLIB.ORG

To the Chair and Members of the PLANNING COMMITTEE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To the Chair and Members of the PLANNING COMMITTEE Peter Whalan To the Chair and Members 742226 of the PJW/ED – R82/1/1 PLANNING COMMITTEE (STRATEGIC) Email [email protected] 11 July 2008 Dear Sir/Madam A meeting of the PLANNING COMMITTEE (STRATEGIC) will be held in the COUNCIL CHAMBER, CIVIC OFFICES, MERRIAL STREET, NEWCASTLE on TUESDAY, 22 JULY 2008 at 7.00pm. AGENDA 1. Minutes of the last meeting (copy attached). 2. Declarations of Interest. 3. To consider the report of the Executive Management Team on items requiring decisions (copy attached). 4. To consider any business which is urgent within the meaning of Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act 1972. Yours faithfully A CAMPBELL Democratic Services Manager Officers will be in attendance prior to the meeting for informal discussions on agenda items. NEWCASTLE-UNDER-LYME BOROUGH COUNCIL REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM TO THE PLANNING COMMITTEE (STRATEGIC) 22 July 2008 1. KNUTTON & CROSS HEATH DEVELOPMENTS SITES SPD – PHASE 1 Submitted by : Regeneration and Development Directorate Portfolio : Regeneration & Planning Ward(s) affected : Cross Heath and Knutton & Silverdale Purpose of the Report To inform members of the results of the consultation process on the draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) and to consider the Knutton and Cross Heath Development Sites SPD, Phase 1, prior to approval by Council on 30 July 2008. Recommendation That the Council be recommended to adopt the Supplementary Planning Document for Knutton and Cross Heath phase 1, subject to any amendments made by this committee. Reasons The preparation of the SPD is included in the Council's approved Local Development Scheme and its adoption is an important priority in the Local Development Framework. 1. Background 1.1 Members will recall that a draft SPD was agreed by the Planning Committee on 6 February 2008, for consultation purposes. 1.2 The draft SPD, together with its supporting Sustainability Appraisal, has been the subject of an extensive consultation programme. The Knutton and Cross Heath Community were sent letters to inform them of the publication of the draft SPD and how they could participate in the consultation process. Articles were also published in local newsletters and press releases issued. A range of consultation events took place with ward members, key partners and local residents, including several residents groups. The whole process was assisted by the Neighbourhood Management Pathfinder team and Aspire Housing. Appendix ‘B’ (cream paper) sets out the process out in detail. 1.3 The formal consultation period lasted six weeks, ending on 31 March 2008. An information event was held more recently on the 26 June to update local residents on the results of the formal consultation and to outline the proposals to amend the SPD. 1.4 This SPD will form part of the Newcastle Development Framework and will provide specific guidance on development control matters for two key development sites in Knutton and 1 Cross Heath to be developed under Phase 1 of the Renew Housing Market Renewal (HMR) programme and, as such, will be regarded as a material consideration. It has been explained previously, in reports relating to the draft Town Centre SPD, that an SPD does not set policy but can only elaborate on or interpret existing policy and for this reason it does not have the same status as a Development Plan Document. However, the fact that it has undergone some form of statutory preparation increases its status. In this case the policy context is provided by saved policies within the Structure Plan, the Local Plan and emerging policy and guidance within the Core Spatial Strategy. 2. Representations Received 2.1 In total, 23 individuals or organisations submitted formal representations, which included several who had not been directly consulted. The representations were analysed to identify each specific issue, resulting in the region of 60 separate comments being recorded on the database. This is set out at Appendix ‘B’, which shows the issues raised by each consultee, an analysis of those issues, grouped together, with your officer’s response. In most cases there is a clear recommendation – either to reject the comment or to make a change to the content of the SPD. 3. Summary of Issues 3.1 The list below summarises the main areas of concern which were raised during the consultation process: • Divided opinion over the proposal to build a vehicular link to Douglas Road. • Insufficient reference to the importance of landscape features and habitat provision. • Concern that too much affordable housing is to be built. • Concern that the extension of the pedestrian network in the vicinity of St Bernard’s road and the Wammy will generate community safety issues and lead to an increase of on street parking. • Clearer information needs to be provided relating to the role of open space. • Concern that play areas will attract anti social behaviour. • Flooding issues are not adequately addressed. • A lack of detailed guidance on the Lower Milehouse Estate. • Insufficient information generally relating to building heights, house designs and materials. • Parking problems on the Cotswold Estate (the estate is outside the scope of phase 1). • The role of Knutton Village as a retail centre should be enhanced (the village is outside the scope of phase 1). • The relationship to other policy documents is unclear. • More reference needs to be made to the historic character of the area. • The document contains too much text and needs to be simplified. • Lack of reference to parts of Collins and Aikman site not under English Partnerships ownership. • Use of borough wide evidence for housing need questioned. • Traffic capabilities of Lower Milehouse Lane and subsequent access requirements to Collins and Aikman site. • Inadequate references to nature conservation issues within the site. 2 4. The Revised SPD 4.1 To address these issues a substantial number of changes to the SPD have been made. Consideration has therefore been given to the need to undertake a second round of consultation. However since the changes largely reflect the comments received and they do not significantly impact on the original priorities and key design principles contained in the draft SPD, it is considered unnecessary to subject the SPD to a further round of consultation. Furthermore the information event, held on 26 June, (noted above) has helped to keep the local community informed of the key changes. Members will be aware from previous reports that adoption of this SPD is important to facilitate the submission of key planning applications, which will work to progress the objectives of the HMR programme and it is, therefore, vital that further delays to the programme are avoided if at all possible. 4.2 An amended version of the SPD, (Appendix ‘A’) will be forwarded to Members separately. It is intended that the final SPD will be presented in colour, with a number of additional photos and illustrations. Introduction 1. Change of SPD title In its draft form, the document was titled ‘Knutton and Cross Heath Design Brief SPD’. However, the SPD actually supplements existing local and structure plan policies on a range of issues, of which design is just one. It is therefore felt more appropriate to rename the document the ‘Knutton and Cross Heath Development Sites SPD’. This better reflects the purpose of the document as a basis for judging planning applications in the area. It does not represent a shift in priorities from the draft document that has been subject to public consultation. 2. Key Issues A simplified summary of the key issues affecting Knutton and Cross Heath has been provided. 3. Policy Context Amendments have also been made in relation to the policy context of the SPD (both in the main body of the report and appendix). Effort has been made throughout the document to make clear what local plan and structure plan policies the guidance supplements. This was felt necessary to lessen the risk of the SPD being challenged and applications going to appeal. 4. SPD Objectives The SPD objectives have been simplified to make the document less wordy and reduce repetition in the document. Characterisation of the Plan Area 1. The text has been simplified and context maps have been added to provide clearer information and make the document more ‘user friendly.’ Detailed Development Areas 1. Clearer design principles Design principles have been reworded to provide a clearer indication of what is expected of developers. This includes increased emphasis on the need to: 3 • Minimise flood risk • Provide clear links to open space and residential areas • Protect and enhance areas of natural habitat With particular reference to Lower Milehouse Lane the key design principles are now set out as: • Existing site access to be retained • Inclusion of some taller properties on Lower Milehouse Lane frontage to respect heights of Extra Care and Health Centre opposite • Provision one Neighbourhood Equipped Area of Play (NEAP) in the centre of the estate, to be faced onto and not backed onto, by properties • Creation of well defined links to open space with maximum opportunities for natural surveillance so these through siting of properties • Creation of a mixed community through a combination of 3-4 bed houses, 2 bed bungalows and 1-2 bed apartments, with the inclusion of 25% affordable housing • Retention and improvement of a natural wildlife area between new properties and Lymedale Cross Industrial Estate. In terms of the Collins and Aikman site, the key change from the draft SPD is the removal of reference to a new highway to Douglas Road. County Highways have deemed this unacceptable, and as such proposals have been downgraded to the provision of an improved cycle and pedestrian link. Another key amendment is an increased emphasis on ensuring the comprehensive redevelopment of the Collins and Aikman site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Development Scheme May 2007
    Local Development Scheme May 2007 Regeneration & Planning Services Newcastle-under-Lyme B.C. Local Development Scheme 2007-10 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE PLANNING SYSTEM AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS 3 2.1 The planning system 3 2.2 The process 3 2.3 Sustainability appraisal and strategic environmental assessment 4 2.4 Public participation in the planning system 4 3 CONTENT AND RATIONALE 7 3.1 Saved policies 7 3.2 Further rationale 8 3.3 Development Plan Documents 9 3.4 Supplementary Documents 9 4 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PROFILES 11 4.1 Statement of Community Involvement 12 4.2 Development Plan Documents 13 4.3 Supplementary Planning Documents 17 5 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND MANAGEMENT 23 5.1 Programme management 23 5.2 Work allocation, resources and corporate priorities 23 5.3 The Council’s Decision making process 24 5.4 Risk assessment 25 5.5 Monitoring and review: the A.M.R. 25 5.6 Managing the evidence base 25 Appendix 1: SUMMARY OF 2007 LDS INCLUDING REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS 27 DELETED FROM THE 2006 PROGRAMME Appendix 2: FORMATION OF LDF (DIAGRAM) 31 Appendix 3: REPLACEMENT OF SAVED LOCAL PLAN POLICIES 33 Appendix 4: LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK – PROGRAMME 39 Appendix 5: RISK ASSESSMENT 41 Appendix 6 EVIDENCE BASE 47 GLOSSARY 51 Newcastle-under-Lyme B.C. Local Development Scheme 2007-10 Newcastle-under-Lyme B.C. Local Development Scheme 2007-10 Newcastle-Under-Lyme Borough Council Draft Local Development Scheme 1. INTRODUCTION The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 introduced major changes in how we plan for the future of the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact Assessment Toolkit
    Staffordshire Local Transport Plan 2011 Appendix E: Health Impact Assessment Toolkit What is Health Impact Assessment? What are the Fundamental Principles of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is defined as: Health Impact Assessment? Health Impact Assessment is both underpinned and “A combination of procedures, methods and tools by approached practically by the adoption of a ‘social which a policy, programme or project may be judged as model’ of health: to its potential effects on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within the population” • An acceptance that health is determined and (WHO, European Centre for Health Policy, 1999). influenced by a wide range of factors, e.g. employment, housing, educational attainment. These What are the Aims of Health Impact determinants of health are considered as part of the Assessment? application of this toolkit (See Appendix 1, Figure 1). Health Impact Assessment is a planning tool for use by • An acceptance that HIA should be concerned with the statutory, private and voluntary sectors in assessing addressing health inequalities. the potential impact on health of key policies, strategies and major service developments. It aims to: • The involvement of key stakeholders and communities in the HIA process. • Inform and influence decision-making by considering and taking into account any effects on When should you carry out a Health health and health inequalities of a policy, strategy Impact Assessment? or major service development, before decisions are made. For guidance purposes, it is recommended that the HIA exercise should be carried out on proposals involving • Enhance the positive health impacts of a policy, all of the essential criteria and a minimum of one strategy or major service development.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Under Lyme District Profile
    EARLY YEARS DISTRICT PROFILE NEWCASTLE UNDER LYME DISTRICT PROFILE DECEMBER 2015 1 NEWCASTLE UNDER LYME DISTRICT PROFILE CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Overview Ward Boundaries .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Population ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Vulnerable Groups ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Household Composition ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Early Years Reach .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Executive Summary
    North Staffordshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Framework Level 1 Executive Summary July 2008 Halcrow Group Limited North Staffordshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Framework Level 1 Executive Summary July 2008 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Lyndon House 62 Hagley Road Edgbaston Birmingham B16 8PE Tel +44 (0)121 456 2345 Fax +44 (0)121 456 1569 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the brief from Gloucestershire County Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2008 North Staffordshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Local Development Framework Level 1 Executive Summary Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 0 Executive Summary 08/07/2008 RD Prepared by: Caroline Mills Final: 08/07/08 Checked by: Beccy Dunn Final: 08/07/08 Approved by: John Parkin Final: 08/07/08 Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Executive Summary Gloucestershire County Council This page is left intentionally blank Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment: Executive Summary Gloucestershire County Council 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Background In September 2007 Stoke-on-Trent City Council and Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council commissioned Halcrow to produce a Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). Figure 1: North Staffordshire SFRA Study Area The SFRA has been prepared to support the application of the Sequential Test (by the Councils) outlined in Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk (PPS25), and to provide information and advice in relation to land allocations and development control.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Regeneration Framework
    Knutton, Cross Heath, Silverdale and Chesterton Area Regeneration Framework RENEW North Staffordshire March 2008 Knutton, Cross Heath, Silverdale and Chesterton Area Regeneration Framework i Contents 1. Introduction..................................................................... 1 2. Understanding the ARF Area ................................................ 4 3. Vision and Objectives for the ARF ........................................ 16 4. ARF Strategy and Proposals................................................. 21 5. Delivering Local Benefit ..................................................... 33 6. Delivery Strategy ............................................................. 41 Appendices ........................................................................ 49 Appendix 1 - Standard Construction Skills Formula....................... 50 Figures 1 Context Plan 2 ARF Boundary Land Use Plan 3 Built Environment Assessment 4 Silverdale Photosheet 5 Knutton and Cross Heath Photosheet 6 Chesterton Photosheet 7 Regeneration Activity 8 Vision Diagram – ‘Three Dales Corridor’ 9 Spatial Framework Building Design Partnership with King Sturge, JMP Consultants and FSquared RENEW North Staffordshire March 2008 Knutton, Cross Heath, Silverdale and Chesterton Area Regeneration Framework 1 1. Introduction Background to RENEW - a spatial framework and strategy RENEW North Staffordshire is one of nine Housing Market Renewal Pathfinders A significant amount of investment is already being made within the Knutton, Knutton, Cross Heath, Silverdale
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER)
    Agenda Item: 5 Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) SPECIAL ADVISORY GROUP Date: 28 October 2011 Portfolio(s) ALL Originating Service Group(s) DELIVERY Contact Officer(s)/ SUSAN KEMBREY KEY DECISION: YES Telephone Number(s) 4300 IN FORWARD PLAN: YES Title BOUNDARY COMMISSION REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES – WEST MIDLANDS REGION CONSULTATION ON INITIAL PROPOSALS Recommendation (a) That the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for England for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region England as detailed in Sections 2 and 3 of the report be noted (b) That the Special Advisory Group recommend Cabinet to invite the three political groups to formulate their individual views on the proposals set out in the consultation paper for submission to the Boundary Commission direct. 1 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To advise of the consultation exercise on the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for the review of Parliamentary Constituencies in the West Midland region and the date to respond to the consultation. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non- departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The BCE conduct a review of all the constituencies in England every five years. Their role is to make recommendations to Parliament for new constituency boundaries. The BCE is currently conducting a review of all Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England based on new rules laid down by Parliament. These rules involve a reduction in the number of constituencies in England (from 533 to 502) and stipulate that every constituency, apart from two specific exemptions, must have an electorate no smaller than 72,810 and no larger than 80,473.
    [Show full text]
  • Knutton & Cross Heath Development Sites
    Newcastle-under-Lyme Local Development Framework Knutton & Cross Heath Development Sites SPD (Phase 1) Sustainability Appraisal Adopted July 2008 KNUTTON & CROSS HEATH DEVELOPMENT SITES SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL Sections Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Appraisal Methodology 3 3. Sustainability Assessment Stage A Scoping Report : Comments 6 4. Baseline, Sustainability issues and Sustainability Objectives. 7 5. Testing the SPD Objectives against the Sustainability Objectives 12 6. Developing the SPD Options 13 7. Predicting and evaluating the effects of the draft SPD. 16 8. Mitigation of adverse impacts and maximising beneficial 17 impacts 9. Monitoring the effects of the SPD 18 Appendix A: Compatibility Matrix for Sustainability and SPD 19 Objectives Appendix B: Options Appraisal – Impact on Sustainability Issues 23 And Objectives - 1 - 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Knutton & Cross Heath Development Sites Supplementary Planning Document 1.2 The Knutton & Cross Heath Development Sites Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) will form part of the Newcastle-under-Lyme Local Development Framework (LDF) produced by the Borough Council in conjunction with the local community and other key stakeholders. 1.3 The Knutton & Cross Heath Development Sites SPD will form part of the planning framework for Knutton and Cross Heath, which in 2003 was designated an Area of Major Intervention under the Housing Market Renewal Programme. It will specifically relate to the sites to be developed under the Renew North Staffordshire programme and will provide the means for giving greater specific guidance on development matters including securing good design quality. It will amplify the policies set out in the Core Strategy and provide further details of a number of ‘saved’ policies in the Newcastle-under- Lyme Local Plan 20011.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle-Under-Lyme Borough Council Leisure
    Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Leisure Needs Assessment & Playing Pitch Strategy A Final Report By Strategic Leisure Limited July 2006 CONTENTS Page SECTION I - INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 01 • Introduction • Scope of the Study • Report Format and Structure • Framework for the Study • Methodology • Summary of Key Tasks • Background to the Study: Local Level Assessments SECTION II - STRATEGIC CONTEXT 11 • Demographics • National, Regional and Local Context SECTION III - KEY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS: OUTDOOR SPORTS 17 (BOROUGH WIDE) • Outdoor Sports Facilities ¾ Playing Pitches ¾ Other Sports SECTION IV - KEY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS: INDOOR SPORTS 47 (BOROUGH WIDE) • Indoor Sports Facilities • Community Centres SECTION V - KEY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS: AREA BASED 59 • Findings by Area: ¾ Knutton Cross Heath Area (AMI) ¾ Silverdale Area ¾ Urban Zone: Playing Pitch Assessment SECTION VI - SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES & CHALLENGES 81 SECTION VII - CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 83 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 - Study Consultation APPENDIX 2 - Strategic Context APPENDIX 3 - Supply and Demand Data (Main Database) APPENDIX 4 - Playing Pitch Assessment Summary & Assessment Calculations APPENDIX 5 - Indoor Sports Facility Assessment (FPM) APPENDIX 6 - Neighbouring Facilities APPENDIX 7 - Action Plan APPENDIX 8 - Hierachy of pitches (all sports) APPENDIX 9 - Residents Door-to-door Survey APPENDIX 10 - Community Centre Analysis MAPS (In separate document) MAP 1 - Bowling Greens MAP 2 - Tennis Courts MAP 3 - Athletics Track MAP 4 - Athletics Track (with catchment area) MAP
    [Show full text]
  • RENEW North Staffordshire
    RENEW North Staffordshire Impacts and Trends Index of Deprivation 2007 •All 3 LA areas were ranked more deprived in the latest index •Stoke-on-Trent was ranked in the Top 10 most deprived for Income, Employment, Health, Education & Crime. •Each of RENEW’s intervention areas were ranked within the 25% most deprived in the % of Population living in areas classified as: country. Meir within the 10% Most 20% Most 50% Least Overall Deprivation Rank 2004 Rank 2007 Deprived Deprived Deprived 10% most deprived. Stoke-on-Trent 18th 16th 32.2% 53.3% 15.0% Newcastle-under-Lyme 138th 151st 3.3% 14.2% 49.5% Staffordshire Moorlands 182nd 190th 0.0% 4.7% 70.4% Stafford Borough 244nd 253rd 0.0% 3.0% 80.6% West Midlands 15.0% 27.3% 42.9% Population Change 4 •After two decades of regression - 3 population estimates for both 2 Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire Moorlands returned to positive 1 growth. 0 -1 Stke-on-Trent Newcastle- Staffordshire West Midlands England •Remarkably Stoke-on-Trent -2 under-Lyme Moorlands moved into positive growth despite continued out-migration to -3 Newcastle-under-Lyme, -4 Staffordshire Moorlands and other -5 parts of the county notably Stafford and East Staffordshire % Change 82-92 % Change 82-02 % Change 02-06 (both containing areas with new Growth Point status). Economic Activity 86 •Whilst Stoke-on-Trent has 84 become more economically 82 active, it is still ranked the 42nd 80 lowest in the UK - with rates 78 consistently 4% below the 76 74 national average. 72 70 •Newcastle-under-Lyme & 68 Staffordshire Moorlands remain 66 above national & regional Stoke-on-Trent New castle- Staffordshire West Midlands UK comparators – although the rate under-Lyme Moorlands of activity has fallen by 5% in 2002 2008 Newcastle.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle-Under-Lyme and Stoke-On-Trent Urban Design Guidance Consultation Draft
    1. Introduction Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Urban Design guidance Consultation Draft Baseline Report July 2008 Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Urban Design Guidance i Contents Section Page Section Page 1. Introduction 1 3. Initial urban design appraisals 10 1.1 Introduction 1 3.1 Topography 10 1.2 Context 1 3.2 Transport Corridors 12 3.3 Canals and River Corridors 14 2. Summary of findings 2 3.4 Open Space and Landscape 17 2.1 Initial appraisals 2 3.5 Housing Typologies 21 2.2 Structure of initial findings 2 3.6 Commercial Typologies 24 2.3 Character 3 3.7 Town Centre Studies 26 2.4 Continuity and enclosure 4 3.8 Rural Areas 43 2.5 Quality of the public realm 5 2.6 Ease of movement 6 4. Policy Review 45 2.7 Legibility 7 4.1 Introduction 45 2.8 Adaptability 8 4.2 National policy 45 2.9 Diversity 9 4.3 Development plan policy 46 4.4 Implications for urban design guidance 48 4.5 Other, non planning, policy documents 49 Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Urban Design Guidance 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction The Urban Design Guidance for Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent is proposed to be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) by both Local Planning Authorities. The aim of the SPD is to help translate strategic design policies and plans into practice advice and guidance. Some key areas of focus were identified at the outset of the project, these being: Kidsgrove a.
    [Show full text]
  • February Auction Results
    0800 090 2200 February Auction Results SOLD ADDRESS LOT PRICE 18 Turner Street, Birches Head, Stoke-on-Trent, 1 £57,500 Staffordshire, ST1 2NF 2 354 Hungerford Road, Crewe, Cheshire CW1 6HD £150,000 40 East Street, Weston Coyney, Stoke on Trent, 3 Sold prior Staffordshire, ST3 6QQ 2 Springfield Close, Chesterton, Newcastle-under- LOT 2 4 £65,000 354 Hungerford Road, Crewe, Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 7LY Cheshire CW1 6HD 1 Lincoln Road, Kidsgrove, Stoke-on-Trent, *Guide Price £128,000 5 Unsold Staffordshire, ST7 1HA SOLD £150,000 53 Coseley Street, Smallthorne, Stoke-on-Trent, 6 Sold prior Staffordshire, ST4 7DA Development site, Danehill Grove, Hanford , Stoke- 7 £192,000 on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 4RE 44 The Bank, Scholar Green, Stoke-on-Trent, 8 Unsold Staffordshire, ST7 3LF 1 Hose Street, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, 9 Sold prior ST6 5AL Development site, Warrant Road, Stoke Heath, 10 Sold prior LOT 4 Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 2JS 2 Springfield Close, Chesterton, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Apartment 3, Styche Hall, Styche, Market Drayton, 11 Withdrawn Staffordshire, ST5 7LY Shropshire, TF9 3RB *Guide Price £60,000 227 Merridale Street West, Pennfields, 12 Postponed SOLD £65,000 Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV3 0RP 149 London Road, Chesterton Newcastle-under- 13 Unsold Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 7JD 57 Church Street, Silverdale, Newcastle-under-Lyme, 14 £52,000 Staffordshire, ST5 6JQ Land rear, 167 Rawnsley Road, Hednesford, 15 Postponed Cannock, Staffordshire, WS12 1JQ 16 9 Waine Street, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 4DD £75,500
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle-Under-Lyme and Stoke-On-Trent Core Spatial Strategy
    2 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK NEWCASTLE-UNDER-LYME AND STOKE-ON-TRENT Core Spatial Strategy October 2009 1 2 NEWCASTLE-UNDER-LYME AND STOKE-ON-TRENT Core Spatial Strategy Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. Context and Conformity 9 3. Spatial Portrait 15 4. Strategic Vision and Aims 31 5. Strategic and Spatial Principles 35 6. Core Strategic Policies 105 7. Implementation 125 8. Monitoring 129 Appendices 139 Key Spatial Diagram 155 3 4 1. Introduction 5 1. Introduction 1.1 The Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke-on-Trent Core Spatial Strategy (the Core Spatial Strategy) has been prepared jointly by the two local planning authorities of Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council and the City of Stoke-on-Trent Council. This reflects the strong and well founded reputation that both authorities have for partnership working. Over many years this has worked to secure significant regeneration funding for the sub region, particularly in Stoke-on-Trent, which has seen significant intervention under a wide variety of European, national and regional initiatives. Recently the North Staffordshire Regeneration Partnership has been formed in the desire of all partners in the public, private and voluntary sector to work together towards realising a single vision for the North Staffordshire sub region. The Core Spatial Strategy is a key step towards realising this vision. 1.2 This Core Spatial Strategy also represents the first major stage in the Borough’s and the City’s work to replace their Local Plans with a new Local Development Framework (LDF). The requirement to produce a Local Development Framework was established by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 which came into force in September 2004.
    [Show full text]