DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecosystem Oceanography of Seabird Hotspots: Environmental Determinants and Relationship with Antarctic Krill Within an Important Fishing Ground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ecosystems DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0078-8 Ó 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York Ecosystem Oceanography of Seabird Hotspots: Environmental Determinants and Relationship with Antarctic Krill Within an Important Fishing Ground Jarrod A. Santora,1* Richard R. Veit,2,3 Christian S. Reiss,4 Isaac D. Schroeder,5 and Marc Mangel1,6 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Center for Stock Assessment Research, University of California Santa Cruz, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA; 2Biology Department, CSI/CUNY, 2800 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island 10314, New York, USA; 3CUNY Graduate Center, 565 Fifth Ave., New York, New York 10016, USA; 4Antarctic Ecosystem Research Division, NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, California, USA; 5Physical and Biological Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA; 6Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen 9020, Norway ABSTRACT The discipline of ecosystem oceanography provides a eddy kinetic energy. The spatial organization, chan- framework for assessing the role of mesoscale physical ges in intensity, and distribution shifts of seabird processes on the formation and occurrence of bio- hotspots indicate different environmental drivers logical hotspots. We used shipboard surveys over nine within coastal and oceanic domains and reflect the years to investigate environmental determinants of seasonal variability of the ecosystem. Our results seabird hotspots near the Antarctic Peninsula, a re- indicate at least eight mesoscale hotspot zones that gion experiencing rapid climate change and an represent ecologically important areas where signifi- expanding krill fishery. We hypothesize that seabird cant krill and predator biomass may be concentrated. hotspots are structured by mesoscale ocean condi- Our ecosystem assessment of seabird hotspots iden- tions that reflect differences in prey distribution tified critical foraging habitat and provided reference within oceanic and coastal waters. We used general- points to benefit research on estimating their trophic ized additive models to quantify functional relation- impacts on Antarctic ecosystems and potential effects ships of seabird hotspots with krill biomass, and a suite from the krill fishery. Our approach is generally of remotely sensed environmental variables, such as applicable to other pelagic ecosystems that are struc- tured by hydrographic fronts and eddies, and con- taining schooling forage species shared by multiple wide-ranging predators. Furthermore, identification Received 18 May 2016; accepted 8 September 2016; of biological hotspots is useful for the designation of Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article marine protected areas most critical to potentially (doi:10.1007/s10021-016-0078-8) contains supplementary material, endangered wildlife and fisheries resources. which is available to authorized users. Author Contributions Jarrod A. Santora conceived of and designed the study, performed the research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; Key words: albatross; conservation; ecosystem Richard R. Veit, Christian S. Reiss, and Marc Mangel helped write the assessment; eddy kinetic energy; krill fishery; for- paper; Isaac D. Schroeder contributed new methods and models, and aging ecology; marine protected area; mesoscale; helped write the paper. *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] petrel; spatial ecology; storm petrel. J. A. Santora and others INTRODUCTION heterogeneity of marine ecosystems and patchiness of their prey, seabirds frequently form dense The discipline of ecosystem oceanography focuses aggregations associated with hydrographic fronts on relating populations of marine species and their and eddies because these features tend to concen- interactions to environmental fluctuations to pre- trate prey (Hunt 1991; Bost and others 2009; Scales dict ecosystem responses to climate change and and others 2014). The spatial distribution of seabird exploitation (Cury and others 2008). Pelagic hotspots (areas of consistently high local abun- ecosystems are vast, highly dynamic systems, and dance) may provide information on the spatial experimental design is often difficult or impossible, structure and function of marine ecosystems, as but this challenge is overcome through integration well as location of critical foraging grounds, prey of large, multi-interdisciplinary abiotic and biotic availability, and rates of local prey consumption datasets, combined with numerical modeling to (Piatt and others 2006; Lascelles and others 2012; assess ecosystem dynamics. In particular, ecosys- Santora and Veit 2013). Seabirds are especially tem oceanography studies often examine the role susceptible to fisheries interactions (for example, of mesoscale ocean dynamics on biological pro- by-catch and entanglement; Weimerskirch and cesses, such as eddies (that is, circular movement of others 2000; Robertson and others 2014) and pol- water), occurring on spatial scales ranging from 10 lution (for example, oil spills), making identifica- to 1000 km and temporally, from 10 to 30 days tion of their hotspots a priority for their (Cury and others 2008), and their effect on the conservation in the Southern Ocean (Consta- concentration of nutrients, primary production, ble and others 2000; Hooker and others 2011; and species distributions and interactions (Bakun Harris and others 2015). Furthermore, commercial 1996). The occurrence and spatial intensity of harvest of krill is concentrated near the Antarctic biological hotspots, areas of increased species Peninsula and increased over time (Nicol and oth- abundance, diversity, and/or trophic transfer (Sy- ers 2012), warranting concern about depletion of deman and others 2006), are thought to be linked krill within seabird hotspots. to mesoscale ocean conditions, but functional Petrels, storm petrels, and albatrosses (Procel- relationships among biophysical conditions gener- lariid seabirds) are long-lived (for example, 20–70 ating hotspots are not well known (Suryan and years+) and highly mobile predators, capable of others 2012; Hazen and others 2013; Santora and covering vast oceanic regions during foraging trips others 2014). Through an integration of satellite and post-breeding migrations (Schreiber and Bur- remote sensing of ocean conditions, acoustic sur- ger 2001). They have diverse foraging strategies veys for Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba; hereafter with broad diets and are surface feeders, consum- krill) biomass, and seabird foraging distributions, ing a variety of euphausiids, meso- and ben- we investigate the mesoscale environmental dri- thopelagic fishes, squids, and various vers of seabird hotspots within the Northern microzooplankton (for example, copepods; Croxall Antarctic Peninsula (NAP) large marine ecosystem. and Prince 1980; Ainley and others 1992; Croxall This ecosystem is experiencing rapid climate and others 1997; Cherel and others 2002). Due to change (Meredith and King 2005; Murphy and their collective biomass and demand for krill, pro- others 2013), increasing human presence (for cellariid seabirds may play a major role in the example, tourism; Tin and others 2008), and an trophodynamics of Antarctic marine ecosystems, expanding commercial krill fishery (Nicol and yet their consumption of krill is poorly quantified others 2012). Moreover, there is growing concern compared to penguins, seals, and whales (Croxall that climate change and overexploitation of krill on and others 1984, 1997; Trivelpiece and others regional scales may impact the resilience of this 2011; Watters and others 2013). We used stan- marine ecosystem (Trivelpiece and others 2011; dardized shipboard surveys to investigate the Murphy and others 2013; Watters and others ecosystem oceanography of hotspots for six seabird 2013), and integrated ecosystem assessments of species. We chose two medium-sized fulmarine biological hotspots will benefit ecosystem-based petrels [cape petrel (Daption capense), southern ful- fishery management. mar (Fulmarus glacialoides)], two storm petrels Living at the interface between sea and air, sea- [Wilson’s storm petrel (Oceanites oceanicus), black- birds are excellent indicators of ocean climate bellied storm petrel (Fregetta tropica)], and two variability, availability of epipelagic mid-trophic albatrosses [black-browed albatross (Thalassarche level food resources, and marine ecosystem melanophrys) and grey-headed albatross (Thalas- dynamics and climate variability (Cairns 1988; Reid sarche chrysostoma)]. The fulmarine petrels and and others 2005; Cury and others 2011). Due to the Ecosystem Oceanography of Seabird Hotspots storm petrels breed in the NAP region, while both assess the distribution and abundance of krill and top albatrosses breed outside of the NAP on nearby is- predators. The survey area was partitioned by the lands north of the polar frontal zone (for example, South Shetland Islands, with oceanic waters to the Diego Ramirez Archipelago; Robertson and others north and coastal waters to the south towards the 2007). All these species are primarily krill eaters, Antarctic Peninsula. Circulation in the study area but they do take a variety of fish and zooplankton reflects inputs from the Antarctic Circumpolar Cur- (Croxall and Prince 1980; Ainley and others 1992). rent (ACC), outflow from the Weddell Sea Gyre, and These species represent a range of body sizes and inflow from coastal upstream regions along the flying and feeding strategies (Croxall
Recommended publications
  • Southern Fulmar

    Southern Fulmar

    SOUTHERN FULMAR Fulmarus glacialoides Document made by the French Southern and Antarctic Lands © TAAF Lands © Southern and Antarctic the French made by Document l l assessm iona asse a g ss b e e m lo n r • Size : 45-50 cm t F G e A n t A SOUTHERN FULMAR T • Wingspan : 114-120 cm Fulmarus glacialoides • Weight : 0.7-1kg Order : Procellariiformes — Family : Procellariidae as the ... It is also known GEOGRAPHIC RANGE : The species can be seen in the Southern Ocean but breeds on the coasts of Antarctica and outlying glaciated islands. HABITAT : Southern Fulmars nest on steep rocky slopes and cliff sides, mainly on the coast and on the Antarctic continent. They are highly nomadic outside the breeding season, generally moving north to open waters south of 30°S. © S. BLANC DIET : They eat krill, fish and squid depending on available prey. They also consume carrion and discards from Fulmar Antarctic fishing vessels. BEHAVIOR : REPRODUCTION : Most food is taken by surface-seizing whilst in The breeding season begins in November and egg- flocks. They also skim the surface in low flight laying takes place during the first two weeks of with their beak open. They also sometimes dive December. They breed in colonies on steep rocky at shallow depths to catch their prey. They are slopes and precipitous cliffs on sheltered ledges rather solitary birds that can form small groups or in hollows, sometimes with other species of outside the breeding season. Paired birds tend to petrels. Nests are a gravel-lined scrape in which © S.
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No

    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No

    Measure 2 (2005) Annex E Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 120 POINTE-GÉOLOGIE ARCHIPELAGO, TERRE ADÉLIE Jean Rostand, Le Mauguen (former Alexis Carrel), Lamarck and Claude Bernard Islands, The Good Doctor’s Nunatak and breeding site of Emperor Penguins 1. Description of Values to be Protected In 1995, four islands, a nunatak and a breeding ground for emperor penguins were classified as an Antarctic Specially Protected Area (Measure 3 (1995), XIX ATCM, Seoul) because they were a representative example of terrestrial Antarctic ecosystems from a biological, geological and aesthetics perspective. A species of marine mammal, the Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddelli) and various species of birds breed in the area: emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri); Antarctic skua (Catharacta maccormicki); Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae); Wilson’s petrel (Oceanites oceanicus); giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus); snow petrel (Pagodrama nivea), cape petrel (Daption capense). Well-marked hills display asymmetrical transverse profiles with gently dipping northern slopes compared to the steeper southern ones. The terrain is affected by numerous cracks and fractures leading to very rough surfaces. The basement rocks consist mainly of sillimanite, cordierite and garnet-rich gneisses which are intruded by abundant dikes of pink anatexites. The lowest parts of the islands are covered by morainic boulders with a heterogenous granulometry (from a few cm to more than a m across). Long-term research and monitoring programs of birds and marine mammals have been going on for a long time already (since 1952 or 1964 according to the species). A database implemented in 1981 is directed by the Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chize (CEBC-CNRS).
  • An Assessment for Fisheries Operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands

    An Assessment for Fisheries Operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands

    FAO International Plan of Action-Seabirds: An assessment for fisheries operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands by Nigel Varty, Ben Sullivan and Andy Black BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme Cover photo – Fishery Patrol Vessel (FPV) Pharos SG in Cumberland Bay, South Georgia This document should be cited as: Varty, N., Sullivan, B. J. and Black, A. D. (2008). FAO International Plan of Action-Seabirds: An assessment for fisheries operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands. BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK. 2 Executive Summary As a result of international concern over the cause and level of seabird mortality in longline fisheries, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) Committee of Fisheries (COFI) developed an International Plan of Action-Seabirds. The IPOA-Seabirds stipulates that countries with longline fisheries (conducted by their own or foreign vessels) or a fleet that fishes elsewhere should carry out an assessment of these fisheries to determine if a bycatch problem exists and, if so, to determine its extent and nature. If a problem is identified, countries should adopt a National Plan of Action – Seabirds for reducing the incidental catch of seabirds in their fisheries. South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI) are a United Kingdom Overseas Territory and the combined area covered by the Territorial Sea and Maritime Zone of South Georgia is referred to as the South Georgia Maritime Zone (SGMZ) and fisheries within the SGMZ are managed by the Government of South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands (GSGSSI) within the framework of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living (CCAMLR).
  • Appendix, French Names, Supplement

    Appendix, French Names, Supplement

    685 APPENDIX Part 1. Speciesreported from the A.O.U. Check-list area with insufficient evidencefor placementon the main list. Specieson this list havebeen reported (published) as occurring in the geographicarea coveredby this Check-list.However, their occurrenceis considered hypotheticalfor one of more of the following reasons: 1. Physicalevidence for their presence(e.g., specimen,photograph, video-tape, audio- recording)is lacking,of disputedorigin, or unknown.See the Prefacefor furtherdiscussion. 2. The naturaloccurrence (unrestrained by humans)of the speciesis disputed. 3. An introducedpopulation has failed to becomeestablished. 4. Inclusionin previouseditions of the Check-listwas basedexclusively on recordsfrom Greenland, which is now outside the A.O.U. Check-list area. Phoebastria irrorata (Salvin). Waved Albatross. Diornedeairrorata Salvin, 1883, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 430. (Callao Bay, Peru.) This speciesbreeds on Hood Island in the Galapagosand on Isla de la Plata off Ecuador, and rangesat seaalong the coastsof Ecuadorand Peru. A specimenwas takenjust outside the North American area at Octavia Rocks, Colombia, near the Panama-Colombiaboundary (8 March 1941, R. C. Murphy). There are sight reportsfrom Panama,west of Pitias Bay, Dari6n, 26 February1941 (Ridgely 1976), and southwestof the Pearl Islands,27 September 1964. Also known as GalapagosAlbatross. ThalassarchechrysosWma (Forster). Gray-headed Albatross. Diornedeachrysostorna J. R. Forster,1785, M6m. Math. Phys. Acad. Sci. Paris 10: 571, pl. 14. (voisinagedu cerclepolaire antarctique & dansl'Ocean Pacifique= Isla de los Estados[= StatenIsland], off Tierra del Fuego.) This speciesbreeds on islandsoff CapeHorn, in the SouthAtlantic, in the southernIndian Ocean,and off New Zealand.Reports from Oregon(mouth of the ColumbiaRiver), California (coastnear Golden Gate), and Panama(Bay of Chiriqu0 are unsatisfactory(see A.O.U.
  • Order PROCELLARIIFORMES: Albatrosses

    Order PROCELLARIIFORMES: Albatrosses

    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 64, 78-79 & 82-83. Order PROCELLARIIFORMES: Albatrosses, Petrels, Prions and Shearwaters Checklist Committee (1990) recognised three families within the Procellariiformes, however, four families are recognised here, with the reinstatement of Pelecanoididae, following many other recent authorities (e.g. Marchant & Higgins 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Viot et al. 1993, Warham 1996: 484, Nunn & Stanley 1998, Dickinson 2003, Brooke 2004, Onley & Scofield 2007). The relationships of the families within the Procellariiformes are debated (e.g. Sibley & Alquist 1990, Christidis & Boles 1994, Nunn & Stanley 1998, Livezey & Zusi 2001, Kennedy & Page 2002, Rheindt & Austin 2005), so a traditional arrangement (Jouanin & Mougin 1979, Marchant & Higgins 1990, Warham 1990, del Hoyo et al. 1992, Warham 1996: 505, Dickinson 2003, Brooke 2004) has been adopted. The taxonomic recommendations (based on molecular analysis) on the Procellariiformes of Penhallurick & Wink (2004) have been heavily criticised (Rheindt & Austin 2005) and have seldom been followed here. Family PROCELLARIIDAE Leach: Fulmars, Petrels, Prions and Shearwaters Procellariidae Leach, 1820: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 17th Edition, London: 68 – Type genus Procellaria Linnaeus, 1758. Subfamilies Procellariinae and Fulmarinae and shearwater subgenera Ardenna, Thyellodroma and Puffinus (as recognised by Checklist Committee 1990) are not accepted here given the lack of agreement about to which subgenera some species should be assigned (e.g.
  • Petrelsrefs V1.1.Pdf

    Petrelsrefs V1.1.Pdf

    Introduction I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2017 & 2018 to: [email protected]. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Grateful thanks to Killian Mullarney and Tom Shevlin (www.irishbirds.ie) for the cover images. All images © the photographers. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2017. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 7.3 accessed August 2017]). Version Version 1.1 (August 2017). Cover Main image: Bulwer’s Petrel. At sea off Madeira, North Atlantic. 14th May 2012. Picture by Killian Mullarney. Vignette: Northern Fulmar. Great Saltee Island, Co. Wexford, Ireland. 5th May 2008. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. Antarctic Petrel [Thalassoica antarctica] 12 Beck's Petrel [Pseudobulweria becki] 18 Blue Petrel [Halobaena caerulea] 15 Bulwer's Petrel [Bulweria bulweri] 24 Cape Petrel [Daption capense] 13 Fiji Petrel [Pseudobulweria macgillivrayi] 19 Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialis] 8 Giant Petrels [Macronectes giganteus & halli] 4 Grey Petrel [Procellaria cinerea] 19 Jouanin's Petrel [Bulweria fallax] 27 Kerguelen Petrel [Aphrodroma brevirostris] 16 Mascarene Petrel [Pseudobulweria aterrima] 17 Parkinson’s Petrel [Procellaria parkinsoni] 23 Southern Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialoides] 11 Spectacled Petrel [Procellaria conspicillata] 22 Snow Petrel [Pagodroma nivea] 14 Tahiti Petrel [Pseudobulweria rostrata] 18 Westland Petrel [Procellaria westlandica] 23 White-chinned Petrel [Procellaria aequinoctialis] 20 1 Relevant Publications Beaman, M.
  • Importance of Ice Algal Production for Top Predators: New Insights Using Sea-Ice Biomarkers

    Importance of Ice Algal Production for Top Predators: New Insights Using Sea-Ice Biomarkers

    Vol. 513: 269–275, 2014 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published October 22 doi: 10.3354/meps10971 Mar Ecol Prog Ser FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Importance of ice algal production for top predators: new insights using sea-ice biomarkers A. Goutte1,2,*, J.-B. Charrassin1, Y. Cherel2, A. Carravieri2, S. De Grissac2, G. Massé1,3 1LOCEAN/IPSL — UMR 7159 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Université Pierre et Marie Curie/ Institut de Recherche pour le Développement/Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 75005 Paris, France 2Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR 1934, 79360 Beauvoir sur Niort, France 3Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université Laval, UMI 3376, Takuvik, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada ABSTRACT: Antarctic seals and seabirds are strongly dependent on sea-ice cover to complete their life history. In polar ecosystems, sea ice provides a habitat for ice-associated diatoms that en - sures a substantial production of organic matter. Recent studies have presented the potential of highly branched isoprenoids (HBIs) for tracing carbon flows from ice algae to higher-trophic-level organisms. However, to our knowledge, this new method has never been applied to sub-Antarctic species and Antarctic seals. Moreover, seasonal variations in HBI levels have never been investi- gated in Antarctic predators, despite a likely shift in food source from ice-derived to pelagic organic matter after sea-ice retreat. In the present study, we described HBI levels in a community of seabirds and seals breeding in Adélie Land, Antarctica. We then validated that sub-Antarctic seabirds had lower levels of diene, a HBI of sea-ice diatom origin, and higher levels of triene, a HBI of phytoplanktonic origin, compared with Antarctic seabirds.
  • The Incidence, Functions and Ecological Significance of Petrel Stomach Oils

    The Incidence, Functions and Ecological Significance of Petrel Stomach Oils

    84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NEW ZEALAND ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY, VOL. 24, 1977 THE INCIDENCE, FUNCTIONS AND ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PETREL STOMACH OILS JOHN WARHAM Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Chrb;tchurch SUMMARY: Recent research into the origins and compositions of the stomach oils unique to sea~birds of the order Procellariifonnes is reviewed. The sources of these oils, most of which contain mainly wax esters and/or trigIycerides, is discussed in relation to the presence of such compounds in the marine environment. A number of functions are proposed as the ecological roles of the oils, including their use as slowIy~mobilisable energy and water reserves for adults and chicks and as defensive weaponry for surface-nesting species. Suggestions are made for further research, particularly into physiological and nutritional aspects. INTRODUCTION their table, a balm for their wounds, and a medicine Birds of the Order Procellariiforrnes (albatrosses, for their distempers." In New Zealand, Travers and fuJmars, shearwaters and other petrels) are peculiar Travers (1873) described how the Chatham Island in being able to store oil in their large, glandular and Morioris held young petrels over their mouths and very distensible fore-guts or proventriculi.. All petrel allowed the oil to drain directly into them. In some spedes so far examined, with the significant excep- years the St Kildans exported part of thei.r oil har~ tion of the diving petrels, Fam. Pelecanoididae, have vest, as the Australian mutton-birders stilI do with been found to contain oil at various times. The oi.1 oil from the chicks of P. tenuirostris. This has been occurs in both adults and chicks, in breeders and used as a basis for sun~tan lotions, but most nowa- non~breeders, and in birds taken at sea and on land.
  • Cape Petrel (Southern)

    Cape Petrel (Southern)

    RECOVERY OUTLINE Cape Petrel (southern) 1 Family Procellariidae 2 Scientific name Daption capense capense Linnaeus, 1758 3 Common name Cape Petrel (southern) 4 Conservation status Australian breeding population Vulnerable: D2 Population visiting Australian territory Least Concern 5 Reasons for listing The Australian population breeds at a single location (Vulnerable: D2). Globally the species is listed as Least Concern. Site fidelity is high, so it is assumed that the immigration rate is low. The national status of the breeding population is therefore determined independently of the global status (as per Gärdenfors et al., 1999). Australian breeding Estimate Reliability colonies Extent of occurrence 5,000,000 km2 low trend stable high 2 Area of occupancy 20 km medium 10 Threats trend stable low There are no imminent threats. At sea, some birds are No. of breeding birds 1,000 low likely to be caught on long-lines, but the subspecies is trend stable low usually displaced at feeding areas by larger scavengers, No. of sub-populations 1 high such as albatrosses and giant-petrels. The accidental Generation time 15 years low introduction of rats or cats is a potential threat. Global population share < 1 % high 11 Information required Level of genetic exchange low low None. 6 Infraspecific taxa D. c. australe (New Zealand region) is Least Concern. 12 Recovery objectives 12.1 Maintenance of the existing population. 7 Past range and abundance In Australian waters, breeding on Heard I. (Downes et 13 Actions completed or under way al., 1959, Woehler, 1991). Extralimitally, breeding on 13.1 Population is monitored opportunistically. islands throughout Southern Ocean.
  • Appendix D New Zealand Conservation Status And

    Appendix D New Zealand Conservation Status And

    Appendix D New Zealand conservation status and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) ‘Red List’ threat classification of seabirds mentioned in the report and additionally in Paragraphs 12, 23 and 24 of my evidence. New Zealand conservation status is taken from Robertson et al. (2013), and ‘Red List’ classification from http://www.iucnredlist.org/, where further information regarding categories and criteria employed by the two systems can be found. Taxa marked * were referred to in general, non-specific terms in the report (for example, northern royal albatross here was referred to as ‘unidentified royal albatross’ in the report), but are included here as species for completeness. Taxa are listed in the order they appear in the report, then in the order they appear in Paragraphs 12, 23 and 24 of my evidence. Taxa NZ Conservation Status Red List classification Wandering albatross Migrant Vulnerable Northern royal albatross* At Risk – Naturally Uncommon Endangered Southern royal albatross* At Risk – Naturally Uncommon Vulnerable Antipodean albatross Threatened – Nationally Critical Vulnerable Gibson’s albatross Threatened – Nationally Critical Vulnerable Black-browed albatross Coloniser Near Threatened Campbell albatross At Risk - Naturally Uncommon Vulnerable Grey-headed albatross Threatened – Nationally Vulnerable Endangered Southern Buller’s albatross At Risk - Naturally Uncommon Near Threatened Salvin’s albatross Threatened – Nationally Critical Vulnerable Northern giant petrel* At Risk - Naturally Uncommon Least Concern
  • Densities of Antarctic Seabirds at Sea and the Presence of the Krill Eupha Usia Superba

    Densities of Antarctic Seabirds at Sea and the Presence of the Krill Eupha Usia Superba

    DENSITIES OF ANTARCTIC SEABIRDS AT SEA AND THE PRESENCE OF THE KRILL EUPHA USIA SUPERBA BRYAN S. OBST Departmentof Biology,University of California,Los Angeles, California 90024 USA ABSTRACT.--Theantarctic krill Euphausiasuperba forms abundant,well-organized schools in the watersoff the AntarcticPeninsula. Mean avian densityis 2.6 timesgreater in waters where krill schoolsare present than in waters without krill schools.Seabird density is a good predictorof the presenceof krill. Seabirddensity did not correlatewith krill density or krill schooldepth. Disoriented krill routinely were observedswimming near the surface above submergedschools, providing potential prey for surface-feedingbirds. Responsesof seabird speciesto the distribution of krill schoolsvaried. The small to me- dium-sizeprocellariiform species were the best indicatorsof krill schools;large procellari- iforms and coastalspecies were poor indicators.Pygoscelis penguins occurredat high den- sitiesonly in the presenceof krill schools.These responses are consistentwith the constraints imposedby the metabolicrequirements and reproductivestrategies of eachof thesegroups. Krill schoolswere detectednear the seasurface throughout the day. Correlationsbetween seabirddensity and the presenceof krill during daylight hourssuggest that diurnal foraging is important to the seabirdsof this region. Received19 December1983, accepted4 December 1984. RELATIVELY little is known about the factors birds depend on directly or indirectly for food influencing the distribution of seabirdsin the (Haury et al. 1978). These observationssuggest marine habitat. The past decade has produced that relatively small-scalephenomena, such as a number of studiesattempting to correlatepat- local concentrationsof prey, may be of major terns of avian abundance and distribution with importance in determining the patterns of sea- physical featuresof the oceansuch as currents bird distribution within the broad limits set by and convergences,water masses,and temper- featuresof the physical ocean.
  • Procellariidae Species Tree

    Procellariidae Species Tree

    Procellariidae I Snow Petrel, Pagodroma nivea Antarctic Petrel, Thalassoica antarctica Fulmarinae Cape Petrel, Daption capense Southern Giant-Petrel, Macronectes giganteus Northern Giant-Petrel, Macronectes halli Southern Fulmar, Fulmarus glacialoides Atlantic Fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis Pacific Fulmar, Fulmarus rodgersii Kerguelen Petrel, Aphrodroma brevirostris Peruvian Diving-Petrel, Pelecanoides garnotii Common Diving-Petrel, Pelecanoides urinatrix South Georgia Diving-Petrel, Pelecanoides georgicus Pelecanoidinae Magellanic Diving-Petrel, Pelecanoides magellani Blue Petrel, Halobaena caerulea Fairy Prion, Pachyptila turtur ?Fulmar Prion, Pachyptila crassirostris Broad-billed Prion, Pachyptila vittata Salvin’s Prion, Pachyptila salvini Antarctic Prion, Pachyptila desolata ?Slender-billed Prion, Pachyptila belcheri Bonin Petrel, Pterodroma hypoleuca ?Gould’s Petrel, Pterodroma leucoptera ?Collared Petrel, Pterodroma brevipes Cook’s Petrel, Pterodroma cookii ?Masatierra Petrel / De Filippi’s Petrel, Pterodroma defilippiana Stejneger’s Petrel, Pterodroma longirostris ?Pycroft’s Petrel, Pterodroma pycrofti Soft-plumaged Petrel, Pterodroma mollis Gray-faced Petrel, Pterodroma gouldi Magenta Petrel, Pterodroma magentae ?Phoenix Petrel, Pterodroma alba Atlantic Petrel, Pterodroma incerta Great-winged Petrel, Pterodroma macroptera Pterodrominae White-headed Petrel, Pterodroma lessonii Black-capped Petrel, Pterodroma hasitata Bermuda Petrel / Cahow, Pterodroma cahow Zino’s Petrel / Madeira Petrel, Pterodroma madeira Desertas Petrel, Pterodroma