DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Gas Demand in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Italian Gas Market: Challenges and Opportunities Anouk Honoré NG 76 June 2013 The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, of any of the Institute’s members, and/or of the author’s other affiliations. Copyright © 2013 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-75-6 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My grateful thanks go to my colleagues at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) for their help and advice, and in particular Howard Rogers, Jonathan Stern, Beatrice Petrovich and John Elkins for their careful reading, helpful comments and editorial corrections of the draft. A big thank-you to Alessandra Motz (Università della Svizzera Italiana) for reading the draft and giving me constructive comments and to the sponsors of the Natural Gas Research Programme (OIES) for their support and useful remarks. Last but not least, many thanks to Kate Teasdale who made all the arrangements for the production of this paper. The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the OIES, our sponsors or of the people I have thanked in these acknowledgments. All the opinions expressed and any remaining errors are my sole responsibility. Anouk Honore, May 2013 iii PREFACE The Italian gas market is the third largest in Europe with strong demand growth especially in the power generation sector up to the mid 2000s. But projections of demand growth from that era have not been realised. Clearly the impact of the financial crisis and subsequent recession has had a significant impact, exacerbated by the growth in wind and solar generation capacity. Market liberalisation in the 2000s failed to achieve levels of competition in the mid and downstream sectors to the extent seen in North West European markets. This resulted not only in some of the highest European end-user gas prices, but also delayed development of a liquid trading hub. Only in late 2012 did PSV prices align with the TTF and other North West European hubs after capacity availability issues in linking infrastructure were resolved. Anouk Honore concludes that outlook for gas demand in Italy is not optimistic. With no nuclear power to phase out, and only 2 GW of coal and oil plant potentially impacted by the Large Combustion Plant Directive, any upward trend in gas consumption will ultimately rely on future economic activity, tempered by the growth of renewable capacity. Italy’s contracted supply commitments considerably exceed current and envisaged gas consumption levels. Provided that sufficient export capacity can be secured, this could enable Italy to become a transit market supplying adjacent market zones. If import sources remain suitably diverse, the role of PSV will become more significant with spreads to TTF responding to trans-European fundamentals. Anouk Honore’s paper forms part of an OIES Gas Programme research theme focussing on the most important national gas markets in Europe (and elsewhere). The rationale behind these papers is that individual markets have specific characteristics which are essential to understand in order to look at future trends. Research which attempts to describe and project trends in “European” gas markets misses these essential complexities and is therefore of limited value. This paper follows our previous publications on the UK and Spain, and later this year we shall publish research on the German market. Howard Rogers, May 2013 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 3 PREFACE............................................................................................................................................ 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF MAPS ................................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 CONTEXT AND PURPOSE OF THE PAPER .................................................................................................. 1 STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER ................................................................................................................... 3 I/ PROGRESS OF LIBERALISATION AND COMPETITION...................................................................... 4 1.1. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ITALIAN GAS INDUSTRY ....................................................................... 4 Early days: local production and demand ................................................................................... 4 1970s: The beginning of foreign supplies .................................................................................... 5 2000s: A major gas market highly dependent on imports ........................................................... 6 1.2. FIRST RESULTS OF THE LIBERALISATION PROCESS ......................................................................... 11 The structure of the Italian gas market before liberalisation..................................................... 11 Overview of the liberalisation process ...................................................................................... 12 First results: market structure and competition ........................................................................ 17 1.3. GAS COMPETITION AND PRICES ............................................................................................... 22 High gas prices compared to the rest of Europe........................................................................ 22 Limited impact of competition in the retail market ................................................................... 24 Wholesale market: slow development of gas trading ............................................................... 27 II/ SUPPLY OPTIONS AND CHALLENGES .......................................................................................... 34 2.1. DEPENDENCE LONG-TERM TAKE-OR-PAY CONTRACTS .................................................................. 34 Gas imports ............................................................................................................................. 34 Prices in long term contracts vs spot prices .............................................................................. 36 Renegotiation of long-term contracts....................................................................................... 37 2.2. FUTURE SUPPLIES ................................................................................................................. 43 Reserves and production .......................................................................................................... 43 Pipeline projects....................................................................................................................... 45 Additional LNG......................................................................................................................... 49 2.3. COMPETITION, FLEXIBILITY AND SECURITY OF SUPPLY .................................................................. 51 Access to import infrastructure ................................................................................................ 51 Development of commercial storage ........................................................................................ 57 Security of supply measures ..................................................................................................... 62 III/ FUTURE GAS DEMAND TRENDS ................................................................................................. 66 3.1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES ................................................................................... 66 Main objectives........................................................................................................................ 66 Support schemes for renewable energy .................................................................................... 69 The National Energy Strategy (2013) ........................................................................................ 71 3.2. CHALLENGES IN THE POWER GENERATION SECTOR ...................................................................... 74 Rapid changes in the installed capacity .................................................................................... 74 Fluctuations of the generation mix ........................................................................................... 77 v The future of gas-fired power plants .......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub

    Algeria Upstream OG Report.Pub

    ALGERIA UPSTREAM OIL & GAS REPORT Completed by: M. Smith, Sr. Commercial Officer, K. Achab, Sr. Commercial Specialist, and B. Olinger, Research Assistant Introduction Regulatory Environment Current Market Trends Technical Barriers to Trade and More Competitive Landscape Upcoming Events Best Prospects for U.S. Exporters Industry Resources Introduction Oil and gas have long been the backbone of the Algerian economy thanks to its vast oil and gas reserves, favorable geology, and new opportunities for both conventional and unconventional discovery/production. Unfortunately, the collapse in oil prices beginning in 2014 and the transition to spot market pricing for natural gas over the last three years revealed the weaknesses of this economic model. Because Algeria has not meaningfully diversified its economy since 2014, oil and gas production is even more essential than ever before to the government’s revenue base and political stability. Today’s conjoined global health and economic crises, coupled with persistent declining production levels, have therefore placed Algeria’s oil and gas industry, and the country, at a critical juncture where it requires ample foreign investment and effective technology transfer. One path to the future includes undertaking new oil and gas projects in partnership with international companies (large and small) to revitalize production. The other path, marked by inertia and institutional resistance to change, leads to oil and gas production levels in ten years that will be half of today's production levels. After two decades of autocracy, Algeria’s recent passage of a New Hydrocarbons Law seems to indicate that the country may choose the path of partnership by profoundly changing its tax and investment laws in the hydrocarbons sector to re-attract international oil companies.
  • Company Profile 2020

    Company Profile 2020

    COMPANY PROFILE 2020 INFORMATION AS OF 31/12/2019 | 1 ABOUT US • Edison is the oldest energy company in Europe • It is active in the generation and sale of electricity, in the supply, distribution and sale of gas as well as in providing energy and environmental services to end users. • It oversees integrated activities throughout the electricity and mid-stream gas value chains and aims to be a leading player in the country’s energy transition. It has the target of generating 40% of the production mix from renewable sources by 2030, and is working on the construction of two latest-generation combined cycles able to complement renewable production. • It is committed to the diversification of gas procurement sources and routes for the safety and competitiveness of the national system and to promoting alterative responsible uses of gas for the benefit of the decarbonization of the transport sector. • Since 2012, it has been controlled by the EDF (Electricité de France) Group(1), European leader in the electricity sector and a key actor supporting the transition towards a low-carbon energy future. • The brand platform “Building a sustainable energy future together” underpins Edison's goal of being an efficient and responsible power Company with a sustainable development model. 2019 data (1) EDF owns 97.4% of Edison’s share capital (99.5% of the voting rights) Company Profile 2020 | 2 MILESTONES Edison was Italy's first electricity company and is also one of the oldest energy providers in the world: 1883 The first facility in continental Europe for the commercialisation of electricity is built at the Santa Radegonda theatre in Milan.
  • Gazprom's Monopoly and Nabucco's Potentials

    Gazprom's Monopoly and Nabucco's Potentials

    Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potentials: Strategic Decisions for Europe Nicklas Norling SILK ROAD PAPER November 2007 Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potentials: Strategic Decisions for Europe Nicklas Norling © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, 131 30, Nacka-Stockholm, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potential: Strategic Decisions for Europe" is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Paper series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic independent and externally funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars, it wishes to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region.
  • Security Aspects of the South Stream Project

    Security Aspects of the South Stream Project

    BRIEFING PAPER Policy Department External Policies SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE SOUTH STREAM PROJECT FOREIGN AFFAIRS October 2008 JANUARY 2004 EN This briefing paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs. It is published in the following language: English Author: Zeyno Baran, Director Center for Eurasian Policy (CEP), Hudson Institute www.hudson.org The author is grateful for the support of CEP Research Associates Onur Sazak and Emmet C. Tuohy as well as former CEP Research Assistant Rob A. Smith. Responsible Official: Levente Császi Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department BD4 06 M 55 rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Publisher European Parliament Manuscript completed on 23 October 2008. The briefing paper is available on the Internet at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN If you are unable to download the information you require, please request a paper copy by e-mail : [email protected] Brussels: European Parliament, 2008. Any opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. © European Communities, 2008. Reproduction and translation, except for commercial purposes, are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and provided the publisher is given prior notice and supplied with a copy of the publication. EXPO/B/AFET/2008/30 October 2008 PE 388.962 EN CONTENTS SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE SOUTH STREAM PROJECT ................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................iii 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2. THE RUSSIAN CHALLENGE................................................................................... 2 2.1.
  • The Regulatory Control of Radioactive Waste

    The Regulatory Control of Radioactive Waste

    RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENTAND DECOMMISSIONING IN ITALY 1. NATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND DECOMMISSIONING 1.1 National Framework 1.1.1 Overview of national policy Commercial utilisation of nuclear power in Italy started in 1963 and by 1981 four nuclear power plants, namely the NPPs of Garigliano (BWR), Latina (MAGNOX), Trino (PWR) and Caorso (BWR), and a LEU fuel fabrication installation (Bosco Marengo S.p.A.) had been commissioned. During that period the Nuclear Energy Research Agency (CNEN) – now the Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA) - developed an extensive R&D programme on the nuclear fuel cycle with the operation of experimental fuel cycle installations (e.g. ITREC and EUREX). The three NPPs of Latina, Trino and Caorso continued to be operated until 1987, when they were definitely shut down based on a governmental decision which interpreted the results of a national referendum, called upon after the Chernobyl accident, as the will to abandon the nuclear option. The NPP of Garigliano had been already shut down in 1978, for technical reasons. At the same time the nuclear programme was cancelled, the Interministerial Committee for the Economical Planning (CIPE) required the National Electricity Company (ENEL S.p.A.) to start the decommissioning of the NPPs and a “Safe storage” (IAEA level 1/2) option was initially adopted. In 1999, all ENEL S.p.A. liabilities and assets connected to nuclear power were assigned to a newly established company, named Sogin (Società Gestione Impianti Nucleari) S.p.A., whose shareholder is the Ministry of Economy and Finance, while the Ministry of Economic Development gives the strategic and operational objectives.
  • EDISON-RS-2012-ENG Letter.Pdf

    EDISON-RS-2012-ENG Letter.Pdf

    Sustainability Report Sustainability Report 2012 2012 Edison Spa Foro Buonaparte, 31 20121 Milan tel. +39 02 6222.1 www.edison.it Contents 4 Growth despite the crisis 6 Edison Sustainable Development Policy 47 People as a resource 7 The challenges, the goals 48 Empower the human capital 50 Choosing to improve 54 Health and safety 13 We at Edison. 56 Industrial relations 14 Energy and responsibility 57 Personnel involvement 16 Actors on today’s stage 18 Activities and Projects in the Hydrocarbon Sector 22 Sustainability and Governance 59 The market is our benchmark 27 Stakeholders: our point of reference 60 Edison’s Product Offers for the Market 29 The wealth we create 64 The quality of customer service 67 We seek for comparison 31 Environment means responsibility 32 Our commitments to the environment 69 Respecting the community 34 Mitigating significant environmental impacts 70 Local community relations 39 A systematic approach to biodiversity 82 Shareholders and financers 84 Suppliers 86 Institutions 89 Note on methodology 90 Performance indicators 104 GRI Index 108 Report of the Independent Auditors 110 Edison on line Sustainability Report 2012 Sustainability Report Edison 2012 Edison in Italy... HEADQUARTERS OPERATING COMPANY KHR PLANT (Edison 20%) PRATI DI VIZZE THERMOELECTRIC POWER PLANT EL.IT.E CURON BRUNICO HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT GLORENZA MARLENGO WIND FARM LASA PONTE GARDENA SONICO CASTELBELLO PREMESA PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM PIEVE CAMPO BELVISO TAIO VERGONTE CEDEGOLO VENINA R&D CENTER ALBANO MEZZOCORONA VAL MEDUNA (5 plants) BATTIGGIO ARMISA GANDA POZZOLAGO MERCHANT LINE EL.I.TE. VEDELLO CIVIDATE TORVISCOSA MONZA ZAPPELLO VAL CAFFARO (4 plants) COLLALTO COLOGNO MONZESE PUBLINO Selvazzano MARGHERA COMPRESSOR STATION SESTO S.G.
  • Interim Financial Report at March 31, 2009

    Interim Financial Report at March 31, 2009

    INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT AT MARCH 31, 2009 INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT AT MARCH 31, 2009 Contents INTERIM REPORT ON OPERATIONS INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AT MARCH 31, 2009 STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 2009 6 The Enel structure 64 Condensed Consolidated Income Statement 7 Foreword 65 Statement of total recognized income/(expenses) for the Period 8 Summary of results 66 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet 10 Significant events in the 1st Quarter of 2009 67 Statement of Changes in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity 13 Outlook 68 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 14 Regulatory and rate issues 69 Notes to the interim consolidated financial statements 32 Operating review at March 31, 2009 35 Results by Division 39 – Sales 41 – Generation and Energy Management 44 – Engineering and Innovation 45 – Infrastructure and Networks 47 – Iberia and Latin America REPORTS 50 – International 54 – Renewable Energy 57 – Parent Company, Services and Other Activities 94 Report of the Independent Auditors 59 Operating performance and financial position 4 Interim report on operations 5 at March 31, 2009 6 The Enel structure Corporate Enel SpA Sales Generation and Engineering Infrastructure Energy Management and Innovation and Networks Enel Servizio Elettrico Enel Produzione Enel Produzione Enel Distribuzione Enel Energia Enel Trade Enel Rete Gas Vallenergie Enel Trade Hungary Enel Sole Enel Trade Romania Deval Nuove Energie Enel Linee Alta Tensione (1) Hydro Dolomiti Enel Enel Stoccaggi Iberia and Latin America International Renewable Energy Services
  • CNS Fifth Italian National Report

    CNS Fifth Italian National Report

    Convention on Nuclear Safety Sixth Italian National Report 2013 Convention on Nuclear Safety Sixth Italian National Report 2013 This National Report has been prepared on behalf of the Italian Government by the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................5 SECTION B. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................11 Introductory Remarks .................................................................................................................... 11 Italy’s Nuclear Activities Policy .................................................................................................... 11 Policy Developments ..................................................................................................................... 14 Decommissioning policy .................................................................................................................................. 14 Spent fuel management policy......................................................................................................................... 14 Radioactive waste management policy............................................................................................................ 15 List of Nuclear Installations in Italy.............................................................................................. 18 Italian Participation
  • A Middle Power in a Regional Context: Italy's Economic Security, The

    A Middle Power in a Regional Context: Italy's Economic Security, The

    Department of Political Science Chair of Security Studies A Middle Power in a Regional Context: Italy’s Economic Security, the MENA Region and the Leonardo-Finmeccanica Case SUPERVISOR Prof. Carlo Magrassi CANDIDATE Nicolò Biscottini Student Reg. No. 625032 CO-SUPERVISOR Prof. Federico Niglia ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS At first sight, it might seem reckless to believe that five long and intense years of life and study can be contained in a single final work. Nevertheless, I can affirm with conviction that in the following pages there is not only the Nicolò of yesterday and today but also, and above all, my family, my professors and my teachers who have made me what I am and allowed me to find myself here today to write these lines. First of all, I would like to thank those who have made it possible for this work to take shape, that is the holder of the Chair of Security Studies of LUISS, Guido Carli, Gen. Magrassi, Col. Totaro, Dr. Pasquazzi, and my co-examiner Prof. Niglia. I am not so much grateful for their unquestionable high academic standards as for the humanity and professionalism they showed me during the drafting and elaboration of this work. Special thanks to Dr. Pasquazzi for always being there (really) in a moment of need. Secondly, I strongly desire to express my gratitude to the representatives of the institutional, academic and Italian industrial sectors who provided me with so much information that I was able to integrate into my research. Therefore, I would like to thank Gen. B.A.
  • Case No COMP/M.5740 - GAZPROM/ A2A/ JV

    Case No COMP/M.5740 - GAZPROM/ A2A/ JV

    EN Case No COMP/M.5740 - GAZPROM/ A2A/ JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/06/2010 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32010M5740 Office for Publications of the European Union L-2985 Luxembourg EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16/06/2010 SG-Greffe(2010) D/8548/8549 C(2010) 4171 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article PUBLIC VERSION 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are MERGER PROCEDURE shown thus […]. Where possible the information ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying parties: Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.5740 - GAZPROM/ A2A /JV Notification of 7 May 2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/20041 1. On 7 May 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Gazprom Germania GmbH (“Gazprom Germania”, Germany), which is ultimately controlled by OAO Gazprom (“Gazprom”, Russian Federation) and the undertaking A2A Spa (“A2A”, Italy), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the undertaking PremiumGas S.p.A. (“PremiumGas”, Italy), by way of purchase of shares in a company constituting a joint venture. I. THE PARTIES AND THE OPERATION 2.
  • The Decommissioning of the Latina Nuclear Power Plant

    The Decommissioning of the Latina Nuclear Power Plant

    WM’01 Conference, February 25-March 1, 2001, Tucson, AZ THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE LATINA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT G. Bolla, Eur Ing. Director, Plant Activities Co-ordination, Sogin, Italy. E. Macci, Eur. Ing. Decommissioning Planning Manager, Sogin, Italy. J. F. D. Craik, C. Eng Decommissioning Manager - Bradwell & Hinkley A, BNFL, UK P. Walkden, Ph.D., C Eng. Development Manger, BNFL, UK ABSTRACT Following a referendum in Italy in the late 1980s, the four nuclear power stations owned and operated by the state utility ENEL were closed down. During the late 1990s, twin decisions were made to privatise ENEL and to transform the nuclear division of ENEL into a separate subsidiary of the ENEL group. This group was renamed Sogin and during the past year, the shares in the company have been transferred from ENEL to the Italian Treasury. After agreeing to close the Italian NPPs, ENEL selected a “safestore” decommissioning strategy; anticipating a safestore period of some 40-50 years. This approach was consistent with the funds collected by ENEL during plant operation, and was reinforced by the lack of both a LLW repository and an unambiguous set of clearance limits for the free release of contaminated materials in Italy. On formation, Sogin was asked by the Italian government to review the national decommissioning strategy. The objective of the review was to move from a safestore strategy to a prompt decommissioning strategy, with the target of releasing all of the nuclear sites by 2020. It was recognised that this target was conditional upon the availability of a national LLW repository together with interim stores for both spent fuel and HLW by 2009.
  • Sanctions Against Russia Over Ukrainian Crisis Are Counterproductive

    Sanctions Against Russia Over Ukrainian Crisis Are Counterproductive

    Sanctions against Russia over Ukrainian crisis are counterproductive The tension and the ongoing civil war in Ukraine’s increasingly bloody battles will be expensive for the West and will damage what had been an already precarious relationship between the West and the former Soviet bloc. The West has embarked on an inexplicable ‘crusade’ against Moscow, which has reacted in an entirely predictable manner to the political crisis in Ukraine and then to the civil war involving the largely pro-Russian population in eastern the eastern part of the country and the more pro-EU population in the western regions. Ukraine never existed as such and the struggle now is over border solutions adopted in the fallout of the Soviet Union under pressure from NATO. There was no actual State of Ukraine before the October 1917 Revolution that led the path to the formation of the Soviet Union. Historical arguments aside, Russia has sufficient historical and diplomatic claims over Ukraine that its involvement is understandable and its concerns of Western interference entirely warranted if not downright justified. Nevertheless, the West, NATO, Canada and the United States in particular (though Canada playing an especially and comical role as part of Prime Minister Harper’s ‘hawkish’ foreign policy) have put pressure on Russian President Putin to relinquish Russian interests in Ukraine. This policy is rather more ridiculous than it sounds. It is akin to having Russia and its allies (including China and the BRICS countries) demand that The United States and Canada relinquish interests in Mexico or the Caribbean. The West’s economic (and military) isolation and encirclement maneuver aims to weaken Russia in an effort to cut ties with the separatists Eastern Ukraine.