DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for Remote Video Surveillance Systems Upgrade Program (New Towers) U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment for Remote Video Surveillance Systems Upgrade Program (New Towers) U.S FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR REMOTE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS UPGRADE PROGRAM (NEW TOWERS) U.S. BORDER PATROL, TUCSON AND YUMA SECTORS, ARIZONA U.S. U.S.Department Customs of and Homeland Border SecurityProtection U.S. DepartmentCustoms and of Border Homeland Protection Security U.S.Washington, Border Patrol DC SEPTEMBER 2012 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT NAME OF PROPOSED ACTION Remote Video Surveillance Systems (RVSS) Upgrade Program (New Towers), U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), Tucson and Yuma Sectors, Arizona DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition (OTIA) proposes to upgrade existing RVSS capabilities within the USBP Tucson and Yuma Sectors, Arizona. The upgrade includes replacement of existing RVSS equipment and installation of new cameras on existing and relocated RVSS towers and the construction of new RVSS towers for improved border surveillance in Arizona. The Proposed Action includes the construction, operation, and maintenance of up to 20 RVSS towers and upgrade of command and control facilities in the USBP Yuma, Ajo, Nogales, Naco, and Douglas Stations’ jurisdictions. Each tower will be equipped with a suite of day/night cameras, communications and support equipment. The Proposed Action also includes construction of two access roads (approximately 72 feet) and improvement of 14 approach roads (approximately 19.2 miles). The access roads would typically be constructed to provide a 12-foot-wide driving surface with 2-foot shoulders (16 feet total width). Road construction consists of blading native material. Road improvements include reconstruction, widening, or straightening of existing roads, and installation of drainage structures, such as concrete low-water crossings. Road maintenance would be performed as part of CBP’s comprehensive maintenance and repair program to ensure full-time access to the towers and other infrastructure. Alternative 1: Alternative 1 consists of the construction, operation and maintenance of up to 20 RVSS towers; 14 at preferred sites and six at alternate sites. The same suite of day/night cameras, communications and optional equipment as the Proposed Action would be mounted on these RVSS towers. It also includes construction of one access road (approximately 25 feet) and improvement of 13 approach roads (approximately 19.8 miles). No Action Alternative: Under the No Action Alternative, construction of the proposed RVSS towers will not take place and the current USBP operational practices and procedures will continue. FONSI-2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OTIA initiated public involvement and coordination with Federal, state and local agencies and Federally recognized tribes during site selection activities in June 2011. On June 6, 2012, OTIA released the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) and proposed Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to the public for review and comment. A Notice of Availability for the draft EA and proposed FONSI was published in the Arizona Daily Star, Yuma Sun, Ajo Copper News, Nogales International, Douglas Dispatch and Bisbee Observer. The draft EA was also available for review at the four public libraries in Yuma, Ajo, Nogales, Bisbee and Douglas from June 6, 2012 to July 6, 2012. Comment letters were received from California Department of Transportation, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Arizona Game and Fish Department, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Bureau of Reclamation, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and Native American Heritage Commission. Comments are included in Appendix A of the final EA, and each comment was addressed, as applicable. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Best management practices (BMPs) to reduce or minimize potential impacts on a particular resource are described in Section 5.0 of the final EA and are incorporated by reference to this Finding of No Significant Impact. Physical Environment: The Proposed Action will have a permanent, direct impact on 64.5 acres of land, and approximately 37.1 acres will be temporarily disturbed. Standard erosion control and soil stabilization BMPs will be implemented during and following construction. Construction will not occur in wetlands. The withdrawal of water for construction purposes could have a short-term, minor impact on groundwater resources. Temporary and minor increases in air emissions and fugitive dust will occur during the construction, but would not exceed Federal and state criteria. Natural Environment: The loss of approximately 64.5 acres of habitat will have a permanent, minor impact on wildlife. Increased noise and human presence during construction and maintenance could potentially affect wildlife. The short-term and intermittent use of spotlights at up to 12 towers will also have a minor impact on wildlife. Six Federally-listed species may be affected, but are not likely to be adversely affected, they include: the lesser long-nosed bat, ocelot, Mexican spotted owl, jaguar, Chiricahua leopard frog and southwestern willow flycatcher. Endangered Species Act consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been completed for these species. Designated Critical Habitat for the Chiricahua leopard frog and southwestern willow flycatcher will not be affected by the Proposed Action. The Proposed Action will not affect designated Critical Habitat for the Mexican spotted owl. The Proposed Action will have no effect on Sonoran desert tortoise and would have a potential minor impact on flat-tailed horned lizard. CBP will complete coordination with Bureau of Reclamation and Bureau of Land Management to ensure compliance with the Flat-tailed Horned FONSI-3 Lizard Rangewide Management Strategy. Conservation measures developed in consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce or minimize potential impacts on Federally protected species will be followed. Qualified biological monitors will be present during all construction activities with the potential to disturb Federally-listed and state-listed species or damage their habitats and will be in sight of all construction equipment, vehicles and personnel during all construction activities. Removal of vegetation will be limited in areas with the potential to affect the lesser long-nosed bat and the Mexican spotted owl. Cultural Resources: There will be no adverse effects on any properties eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Concurrence from the Arizona SHPO has been received through the Section 106 process. Cultural resources sites will be avoided during construction as requested by Arizona SHPO during consultation. Human Environment: The Proposed Action will have a long-term, negligible impact on utilities and negligible to minor impacts on the night sky from the use of spotlights. The spotlights at 12 towers will operate, on average, twice per night for a period of approximately 5 minutes each use. The Proposed Action will have a long-term, negligible impact on the radio frequency environment. During construction, there will be a temporary, minor impact on roadways and traffic. Construction expenditures will have a short-term beneficial effect on the local economy. No direct impacts on minority or low-income populations or children will occur. Depending on the location of an observer, most towers will be visible from 3 to 5 miles away, and thus some towers will have a long-term, moderate impact on the aesthetic qualities of the region. There will be no exposure of the environment or public to any hazardous materials. FINDING: On the basis of the [mdings of the EA, which is incorporated by reference, and has been conducted in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive, 023-0 1, and after careful review of the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposal, we find there would be no significant impact on the quality of the human or natural environment, either individually or cumulatively, therefore there is no requirement to develop an Environmental Impact Statement. Further, we commit to implement BMPs and environmental design measures indentified in the EA and supporting documents. Because of overall program assessments, CBP has determined that only 18 of the proposed towers will be built at this time. RVSS tower sites TCA-AlO-0523 and TCA-AlO-0553 may be developed at some time in the future if funding is available; the appropriate level of environmental analysis will be determined subsequent to future activities regarding these two towers. 9/;/~612 s. Sonia N. Padill Date . Executive Director gram Management Office Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition U.S. Customs and Border Protection ~//-ZOJ2- ~ Date Chief, Strategic Planning, Policy, and Analysis Division Headquarters, U.S. Border Patrol U.S. Customs and Border Protection ~h~' q/;z/;z I I MfrlH:CalV(; , Date Executive Director Facilities Management and Engineering U.S. Customs and Border Protection FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR REMOTE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS UPGRADE PROGRAM (NEW TOWERS) U.S. BORDER PATROL, TUCSON AND YUMA SECTORS, ARIZONA U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C. September 2012 Lead Agency: Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs & Border Protection Office of Technology Innovation and Acquisition 1901 S. Bell Street, Room 7-001 Arlington, VA 20598 Points of Contact:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Four—Open Space Element
    Open Space Element Section Four—Open Space Element 4.1 Introduction There are many ways that open space can be defined, but the following definition of open space is the one used in the Yuma County 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Open space is defined as any publicly owned and publicly accessible space or area characterized by great natural scenic beauty or whose existing openness, natural condition or present state of use, if retained, would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resources. Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(D)(1) requires that an open space element contained in a comprehensive plan have the following components: A comprehensive inventory of open space areas, recreational resources and designation of access points to open space areas and resources; an analysis of forecasted needs, policies for managing and protecting open space areas and re- sources and implementation strategies to acquire open space areas and further establish recrea- tional resources; and policies and implementation strategies designed to promote a regional sys- tem of integrated open space and recreational resources and a consideration of any existing re- gional open space plan. A rich variety of open spaces exists within Yuma County. Only a very small portion of the County is urbanized and over 91% of the unincorporated Yuma County is publicly owned. Much of the federally owned land and a small portion of state owned land in Yuma County is specifically designated and managed as open space areas. A comprehensive inventory of these designated open space areas as required under ARS §11-821(D)(1)(a) is contained in this ele- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement MX: Buried Trench Construction
    ADV-AI0 352 AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND WASHINGTON OC F/G 13/2 NOV 77ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT MX: BURIED TRENCH CONSTRUCTION A--ETCttI) UNCLASSIF IED AFSC-TP-81-50 1 EIIIIlNL *IMENMONEEl IIIIiiiiii EIIhIhIhIoE- Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dal. Enftered) REPORT DOCUMENTATIDN PAPE RFAD INSTRUCTIONS 'EFORFCOMPILETING FORM It REPORT 64UMaER " 2 GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER // AFSC-TR-81-50 . TIT.LE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED Fina"l_ Environmental Impact Statement Final 1977-78 MX: Buried Trench Construction and Test Project- 6 PERFORMING O1G. REPORT NUMBER 7 AUTHOR(s) / B. CONTRACT 0R GRANT NUBER(s) Henningson, Durham & Richardson -- Santa Barbara CA 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS AREAQRK UNIT NUMBERS 63305 6,_, 1 CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE Deputy for Environment and Safety N// Office of the Secretary of the AF(SAF/MIQ) 50- Washington DC 20330 14 MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(,f different fron (,o-troIiing Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report) ICBM System Program office Unclassified Space & Missile Systems Organization (SAMS),. DECLASSI FCATON DOWNGRADING Norton AFB California SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of thi, Report) Unclassified Unlimited J 17 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered ,, Block 20, if different from Report) IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse side if necessary and Identify by block number) Environmental Impact Statements Air Force MX Buried Trench Concept 20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse side If necessary and Identify by block number) The United States Air Force proposes to construct two sections of underground tunnel in the San Cristobal Valley on the Luke Air Force Range in Yuma County, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Geomorphology of the Luke Air Force Range, Arizona
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 63 Tectonic Geomorphology of the Luke Air Force Range, Arizona by William C. Tucker, Jr.1 Abstract In arid and semiarid regions the relative rates of tectonic activity and the approximate age of the last major tectonic pulse can be ascertained by analyzing the landforms of the mountain fronts and their adjacent piedmonts. Tectonic activity triggers a change in the base level of fluvial systems that causes the development of a characteristic suite of land­ forms. It is these landform characteristics that are examined in making a tectonic geomor­ phic analysis of an area. The Luke Air Force Range, an Air Force missile and gunnery training range in south­ western Arizona, is an area of typical basin-and-range topography of generally linear mountain ranges separated by broad, flat valleys. While overall the ranges are quite linear, the mountain fronts are, for the most part, highly sinuous, pedimented, and lacking a thick accumulation of recent alluvial material on the piedmont. A tectonic geomorphic analysis of the Luke Air Force Range shows that the area has been almost entirely free of tectonic activity for at least the Holocene and Pleistocene epochs and probably for part of the Pliocene. A few mountain-front segments show signs of slight tec­ tonic activity during the Pleistocene. One mountain- front segment displays landforms indica­ tive of tectonism continuing into the Holocene. Introduction The major portion of the basin-and- range tectonism can be dated with fair reliability us­ Southwestern Arizona has had a long history ing the volcanic rocks and their relationship to of tectonic and igneous activity .
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism, 10 Park Plaza, Suite 4510, Boston, MA 02116
    dventure Guide to the Champlain & Hudson River Valleys Robert & Patricia Foulke HUNTER PUBLISHING, INC. 130 Campus Drive Edison, NJ 08818-7816 % 732-225-1900 / 800-255-0343 / fax 732-417-1744 E-mail [email protected] IN CANADA: Ulysses Travel Publications 4176 Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec Canada H2W 2M5 % 514-843-9882 ext. 2232 / fax 514-843-9448 IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: Windsor Books International The Boundary, Wheatley Road, Garsington Oxford, OX44 9EJ England % 01865-361122 / fax 01865-361133 ISBN 1-58843-345-5 © 2003 Patricia and Robert Foulke This and other Hunter travel guides are also available as e-books in a variety of digital formats through our online partners, including Amazon.com, netLibrary.com, BarnesandNoble.com, and eBooks.com. For complete information about the hundreds of other travel guides offered by Hunter Publishing, visit us at: www.hunterpublishing.com All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a re- trieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. Brief extracts to be included in reviews or articles are permitted. This guide focuses on recreational activities. As all such activities contain ele- ments of risk, the publisher, author, affiliated individuals and companies disclaim any responsibility for any injury, harm, or illness that may occur to anyone through, or by use of, the information in this book. Every effort was made to in- sure the accuracy of information in this book, but the publisher and author do not assume, and hereby disclaim, any liability for loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misleading information or potential travel problems caused by this guide, even if such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Muggins Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Yuma County, Arizona
    Mineral Resources of the Muggins Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Yuma County, Arizona ARIZONA AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAP~ OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability LisL" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL Books OVER THE COUNTER Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ , Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets}, single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • WASHINGTON, D.C.--Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and C Sts., NW.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning
    Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature and National Meaning Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Burtner, Marcus Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 04:13:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/268613 CRAFTING AND CONSUMING AN AMERICAN SONORAN DESERT: GLOBAL VISIONS, REGIONAL NATURE AND NATIONAL MEANING by Marcus Alexander Burtner ____________________________________ copyright © Marcus Alexander Burtner 2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2012 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Marcus A. Burtner entitled “Crafting and Consuming an American Sonoran Desert: Global Visions, Regional Nature, and National Meaning.” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Katherine Morrissey ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Douglas Weiner ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jeremy Vetter ____________________________________________________________Date: 1/7/13 Jack C. Mutchler Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society
    The Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society A discussion of what we do and why Arch Tank For more than 37 years the primary focus of the ADBSS has been the development of wildlife waterholes like this one constructed last Spring at Arch Tank in the Bighorn Mountains. Road Barriers We also work on a host of other projects including building wildcat road barriers into bighorn habitat like this one on the east side of Ragged Top Mountain in the Silver Bells Mountains. And this barrier across a wash near Wolcott Peak in the Silver Bells. And this fence and gate to an old mine claim on the west side of Ragged Top. Fence Removal The ADBSS also assists with fence removal projects like this one between the Cabeza Prieta NWR and Organ Pipe NM for the endangered Sonoran Pronghorn More than 3.5 miles of old fencing was cut down. Gathered up… And removed. Road Improvement Work The ADBSS has also worked on improving important roads. With this project we placed landing mats under the Camino del Diablo on the Cabeza Prieta NWR to repair soft spots caused by excessive UDA and Border Patrol traffic. Nearly a mile of landing mats were placed, 5 sections across, in two areas of this well traveled road. Captures/Transplants Capture and relocation project. Sheep are nut gunned from a helicopter, hobbled and hooded and then flown in a net to the staging center and processing site. A air delivery of sheep to the staging area. Captures Transporting sheep from the landing area to the staging center.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • LEIS Purpose Lead Agency and Cooperating Agencies Frequently
    Renewal of the Barry M. Goldwater Range Land Withdrawal Draft Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS) Frequently Referenced Information LEIS Purpose LEIS Contents This draft LEIS addresses the proposed renewal • Executive Summary —provides a concise of the military land withdrawal and reservation synopsis of the LEIS analysis and for the Barry M. Goldwater Range (BMGR). conclusions. Renewal of the land withdrawal is required by the Military Land Withdrawal Act of 1986 • Chapter 1—describes the purpose of and (Public Law 99-606) if the military proposes to need for the renewal of the land withdrawal continue military use of the lands after as well as other introductory background 6 November 2001. information. The purpose of and need for renewing the • Chapter 2—describes the proposed action, BMGR land withdrawal is to preserve a alternatives, and sub-alternatives (or component of the national defense training base scenarios). for the continued and future readiness of America’s air forces to defend the security of the • Chapter 3—describes the baseline nation and its interests. environment that may be affected by the alternatives. Lead Agency and Cooperating Agencies • Chapter 4— reports the projected The lead agency is the Department of the Air environmental consequences for the Force. Cooperating agencies are the Department proposed action, alternative action, and no- of the Navy, Bureau of Land Management, and action alternative. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. • Chapter 5—reports the probable environmental consequences of each of the Frequently Referenced Figures and Tables renewal sub-alternatives for military administration, withdrawal land area, and Figure Figure Title Page administration of natural and cultural 1-2 BMGR Airspace Structure and 1-17 resources.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Of. the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Map, description and bibliography of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona By Stanley B. Keith 1 Lorraine Schnabel 2 , Ed DeWitt 2 Don E. Gest 3 . and Jan Wilt* Open-File Report 84-0086 1983 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology; present address: MAGMACHEM Assoc., 5114 E. Tunder Dr., Phoenix, Arizona 85044 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, 845 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ^J.C. Wilt and Co., 3035 So. Shiela Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85746 Contents Page Introduction..............................................................1 Classification and nomenclature of the Mineralized Areas..................! Commodities and deposit descriptions......................................2 Sources of information....................................................2 Acknowledgements..........................................................2 References cited..........................................................5 Bibliography.............................................................47 Illustrations Plate 1. Map of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona..............................................in pocket Tables Table 1. Summary of deposit types of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona......................................................3
    [Show full text]