DOCSLIB.ORG

Tectonic Geomorphology of the Luke Air Force Range, Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tectonic Geomorphology of the Luke Air Force Range, Arizona Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 63 Tectonic Geomorphology of the Luke Air Force Range, Arizona by William C. Tucker, Jr.1 Abstract In arid and semiarid regions the relative rates of tectonic activity and the approximate age of the last major tectonic pulse can be ascertained by analyzing the landforms of the mountain fronts and their adjacent piedmonts. Tectonic activity triggers a change in the base level of fluvial systems that causes the development of a characteristic suite of land­ forms. It is these landform characteristics that are examined in making a tectonic geomor­ phic analysis of an area. The Luke Air Force Range, an Air Force missile and gunnery training range in south­ western Arizona, is an area of typical basin-and-range topography of generally linear mountain ranges separated by broad, flat valleys. While overall the ranges are quite linear, the mountain fronts are, for the most part, highly sinuous, pedimented, and lacking a thick accumulation of recent alluvial material on the piedmont. A tectonic geomorphic analysis of the Luke Air Force Range shows that the area has been almost entirely free of tectonic activity for at least the Holocene and Pleistocene epochs and probably for part of the Pliocene. A few mountain-front segments show signs of slight tec­ tonic activity during the Pleistocene. One mountain- front segment displays landforms indica­ tive of tectonism continuing into the Holocene. Introduction The major portion of the basin-and- range tectonism can be dated with fair reliability us­ Southwestern Arizona has had a long history ing the volcanic rocks and their relationship to of tectonic and igneous activity . Large bodies the faulting as a guide. Volcanic rocks that of granit e were intruded during the late Meso­ are clearly pre- faulting, being either ruptured zoic which metamorphosed the preexisting sedi­ by the basin-and-range faults or uplifted to mentary and metamorphic rocks. In the early form mountain ranges, or both, fall generally and middle Tertiary violent volcanic eruptions into the 12-to-15- m. y. -age range (Eberly and poured out small, steep-sided flows of andesite Stanley, 1978). The volcanic rocks that are and latite and blasted pyroclastic materials onto not uplifted and show no apparent evidence of the adjacent landscape. A quieter phase of faulting have ages from 3 to 1.75 m. y. in the basaltic volcanism followed and covered a wider Sentinel basalt flows (Eberly and Stanley, 1978) area than the previous activity . Middle to late and from 1. 0 m. y . to very recent in the Pina­ Tertiary high-angle normal faulting broke cate volcanic field (Lynch, pers. comm., 1979) . southwestern Arizona into horsts and grabens, This brackets the major, widespread, basin­ which resulted in linear, northwest-trending and-range faulting fairly well as being within mountain ranges separated by broad, down­ the 3-to-15-m. y. age range. However, the in­ faulted basins. There were some minor basalt dicators for the cessation of regional faulting flows along some of these faults, apparently do not eXclude the possibility that localized toward the end of the period of basin- and­ faulting could have occurred later t han approx­ range faulting. Additional basalt flows were imately 3 m. y. B. P . poured out during the late Tertiary and early Quaternary. These flows were widely sepa­ The area of the Luke Air Force Range, rated and apparently unrelated by either loca­ which is the area being considered in this tion or orientat ion to the basin- and- range tectonic geomorphic analysis, has had five faulting. seismic events greater than magnitude 4 re­ corded in recent times. The dates, locations, and magnitudes are shown on Figure 1. The lSouthwestern Exploration Associates, sources of these recent events and the exis­ Tucson , Arizona 85710 . tence of surface ruptures are presently un- 64 William C. Tucker, Jr. , 10 2'0 Kilometers \ ~ ~ 0 ? \ rt:)r~ ;il "\ (0,1/: ~~: Fig. 1. Recent seismic events within the Luke Air Force Range. Year and magnitude of the event are given at each approximate epicenter location. -- Source: Bureau of Reclamation (1976). known, but their occurrence, together with assess the relative tectonic activity of mountain the proximity of known active tectonism along fronts or other structural elements during the the nearby San Andreas fault-Salton trough­ Quaternary. In particular, it evaluates the Gulf of California rifting, provides evidence areal variations in relative uplift of mountain for the possibility of tectonic activity in the fronts within the Luke Air Force Range portion area. of southwestern Arizona and applies this eva1u­ ation of late Cenozoic tectonism of the area to Many variables act together to form arid determine its effect on the distribution and fluvial systems. Tectonic activity is the trig­ nature of fluvial sediments. The analysis ger that sets off the independent variable of covers the entire 13,500 km 2 (5,200 mi 2 ) area tectonic base-level change. If tectonic activity of the Luke Air Force Range. causes a stream's base level to fall along part of its reach, the stream will erode more aggres­ Evaluation of past tectonic activity has two sively upstream from the pOint or points of important applications: seismic and sedimen­ ground rupture, will create fresh deposits of tologic. Tectonic geomorphic analysis has the coarse clastics downstream from that point, and potential for indicating which faults within a will transport these coarser clastics a longer given study area have been active, including distance downstream than would otherwise be faults that have not been mapped by previous possible with all other independent variables workers. being the same. The presence of tectonic ac­ tivity has partly controlled sedimentation, both Rate of Tectonic Activity from the standpoint of particle sizes as well as The rate of tectonic activity within a given their areal distribution. mountain range is an important factor in deter­ mining the size and rate of production of sedi­ This report applies the concepts of tectonic ment fr om fluvial systems that originate within geomorphology through landform analysis to the mountain range and deposit their sedimen- William C. Tucker, Jr. 65 tary load within the adjacent basin. Consider two different tectonic settings. The first is tectonically active: rapid uplift at the mountain front has resulted in rugged mountains with steep V -shaped canyons plunging down to the BASIN stream courses that transport sediment. In such a setting, coarse-grained sediments are produced in abundance and delivered directly from the hillslopes into the stream subsystem where they are immediately available for trans­ port to the basin. In a second setting of tectonic quiescence, the hills lopes are steep, but embayed mountain fronts and broad valley floors are typical. In 0. this setting, gravel brought down from the 6u / 61 ~ 6w/61 + 6s/61 hillsides to those reaches of the streams that • 0 .' o · 0 " • 10 • 0 have aU-shaped cross-valley profile is not • • r::1 • • generally delivered directly to the basin. In­ • o . 0 stead, it remains on the flat valley floor and only the gradual weathering of these boulders Fig. 2. Interrelations of local base-level reduces the particle size to that which can be processes conducive for the accumulation of transported from the mountain subsystem to thick alluvial-fan deposits next to a mountain the depositional basin. Within a region tecton­ front (Bull, 1973) ically active in the past and generally inactive during the Quaternary such as the Luke Air shown by Equation 1: Force Range, one should expect to find fine­ grained basin fills overlying coarser basin fills t:; u/!::.t ~ t:;w / t:; t + t:; s/ t:; t (1) that were deposited at a time when the mountain fronts were tectonically active. Equation 1 is one of five equations interrelat­ ing local base processes for the three different Local Base-level Processes tectonic environments. The five equations A process that changes the altitude of a shown in Table 1 form the basis of the three point on a streambed is a local base-level proc­ classes of relative tectonic activity of mountain ess. Base-level processes include stream­ fronts within a given study area during the channel downcutting in the mountains (w) and Quaternary. erosion (e) or deposition (s) on the piedmont. These three processes are interdependent and Tectonic Activity Classes are affected by the relative uplift (u) of the The assignment of a tectonic activity class mountain front. These four base-level proc­ for a given mountain front is based on param­ esses, since they affect the activity and form eters that describe diagnostic landform mor­ of the stream, the hillslope development, and phologies within both the erosional and deposi­ the location of deposition and erosion, are re­ tional subsystems. The landforms described sponsible for the topography of the basins in Table 1 are only a few of the many diagnos­ (Bull, 1973). tic landforms for a given class. For example, Class 1 landscapes have more convex ridge The effects of continued and rapid uplift of crests, steeper footslopes, narrower and steep­ mountains relative to the adjacent basins, er canyons, less sinuous mountain fronts, either by continuous or pulsatory uplift, result thicker basin deposits next to the mountains, in a distinctive suite of landforms. Figure 2 better preserved spur facets, and less soil­ depicts the accumulation of thick alluvial-fan profile development on the piedmont than Class deposits adjacent to a faulted mountain front. 3 landscapes (Bull, 1973). Thus, the tectonic Channel downcutting in the mountains will tend geomorphology model defines the interrelations to cause the stream channel to become en­ of tectonic base-level change (uplift) to other trenched into the fan apex, which will cause base-level processes by the equations of Table the locus of deposition to be shifted downslope 1 and allows the assignment of an appropriate on the fan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to El Camino Del Diablo Leg 2B: El Camino Del Diablo from Tule Well to Tinajas Altas
    Cabeza Prieta Natural History Association A Visitor's Guide to El Camino del Diablo Leg 2b: El Camino del Diablo from Tule Well to Tinajas Altas Mile 69.0. 32°13’35”N, 113°44’59”W. Key Junction, Tule Well. At the junction head west (left) to go to Tinajas Altas. Tule Well has a cabin, well, large water tank, and picnic tables. The current cabin was built in 1989 by the US Air Force’s 832nd Civil Engineering Squadron to help celebrate the refuge’s 50th anniversary, and it replaced an earlier cabin built in 1949 for refuge staff, livestock line-riders, and border agents. Traces of the old well are visible. The campground has several picnic tables. The flagpole and Boy Scout monument northwest of the cabin were built for the refuge’s dedication in March 1941 and enhanced in 1989. The original plan was to place a life- sized statue of a bighorn sheep on the monument’s base. The scouts were instrumental in a political campaign to establish the refuge. The original hand-dug well was not there at the time of the Gadsden Purchase and subsequent boundary survey of 1854, nor did Pumpelly mention a well when he passed this way in 1861. But the boundary surveyors of 1891-1896 reported, “During the ‘early sixties’ [1860s] there was a large influx in Mexicans from Sonora to the gold diggings on the Colorado River, and an enterprising Mexican dug two wells near the road, in the purpose of selling water to travelers. But the deaths from thirst along this route became so frequent that the road was soon abandoned and for over twenty years had remained unused.” By another account, perhaps apocryphal, the enterprising Mexican who dug the wells was killed by someone who refused to pay for water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Arizona Salinity Study --- Phase I
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix D HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE GILA BEND BASIN Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 D-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 8 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE AND MOVEMENT ................................... 8 4.2 GROUNDWATER QUALITY .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 AESO/SE 2-21-94-F-192R2 September 30, 2002 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Phoenix Field Office, Bureau of Land Management From: Acting Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for Five Livestock Grazing Allotments in the Vicinity of Ajo, Arizona This biological opinion responds to your request for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1544), as amended (Act). Your request for formal consultation was dated April 19, 2002, and received by us on April 23, 2002. At issue are impacts that may result from the proposed reauthorization of livestock grazing on the Sentinel, Cameron, Childs, Coyote Flat, and Why allotments located in Maricopa and Pima counties, Arizona. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has determined that the proposed action for the five allotments may adversely affect the endangered Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americana sonoriensis), and the proposed action for the Cameron and Childs allotments may adversely affect the endangered cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum). In your letter, you also requested our concurrence that the proposed action on the Cameron, Childs, Coyote Flat, and Why allotments may affect, but will not likely adversely affect, the endangered lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuena). We concur with that determination, which is based on sound analysis and guidance criteria for the species mutually agreed upon by our agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRELIMINARY DEPOSIT-TYPE MAP of NORTHWESTERN MEXICO by Kenneth R
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRELIMINARY DEPOSIT-TYPE MAP OF NORTHWESTERN MEXICO By Kenneth R. Leonard U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-158 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade, product, firm, or industry names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Menlo Park, CA 1989 Table of Contents Page Introduction..................................................................................................... i Explanation of Data Fields.......................................................................... i-vi Table 1 Size Categories for Deposits....................................................................... vii References.................................................................................................... viii-xx Site Descriptions........................................................................................... 1-330 Appendix I List of Deposits Sorted by Deposit Type.............................................. A-1 to A-22 Appendix n Site Name Index...................................................................................... B-1 to B-10 Plate 1 Distribution of Mineral Deposits in Northwestern Mexico Insets: Figure 1. Los Gavilanes Tungsten District Figure 2. El Antimonio District Figure 3. Magdalena District Figure 4. Cananea District Preliminary Deposit-Type Map of
    [Show full text]
  • A Visitor's Guide to El Camino Del Diablo Leg 2A: Darby Well Road to Tule Well
    Cabeza Prieta Natural History Association A Visitor's Guide to El Camino del Diablo Leg 2a: Darby Well Road to Tule Well "You can't see anything from a car; you've got to get out of the ... contraption and walk, better yet crawl, on hands and knees, over sandstone and through the thornbush and cactus. When traces of blood begin to mark your trail you'll see something, maybe." Ed Abbey, Desert Solitaire Mile 0.0. 32° 21’21.5”N, 112° 49’37.5”W. Key Junction. Hwy 85 at Darby Well Road to Bates Well. Take a moment here to double check that your gas gauge reads "full," your tires have air, and the ice chest is stowed for a bumpy ride. No services from here to Yuma; 130 miles of bad road lie ahead. Reset odometer. Make sure that you have your Cabeza Prieta range permit from https://luke.isportsman.net and that you check in by phone with Goldwater-West to give them your permit number or use the website http://www.rangeaccess.com/RangeAccess.aspx. The Goldwater number is on the back of your permit, but Darby Well Road may be your last reliable phone connection. Black Mountain (3,008 feet), standing to left of the road ahead, is an eroded remnant of a basaltic volcano that once covered a much larger area. The horizontal banding is due to differences in hardness between the basalt flows and softer tuffs that have been tilted and faulted. The brown- black color tinged with red is typical oxidation and weathering for such rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Four—Open Space Element
    Open Space Element Section Four—Open Space Element 4.1 Introduction There are many ways that open space can be defined, but the following definition of open space is the one used in the Yuma County 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Open space is defined as any publicly owned and publicly accessible space or area characterized by great natural scenic beauty or whose existing openness, natural condition or present state of use, if retained, would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resources. Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(D)(1) requires that an open space element contained in a comprehensive plan have the following components: A comprehensive inventory of open space areas, recreational resources and designation of access points to open space areas and resources; an analysis of forecasted needs, policies for managing and protecting open space areas and re- sources and implementation strategies to acquire open space areas and further establish recrea- tional resources; and policies and implementation strategies designed to promote a regional sys- tem of integrated open space and recreational resources and a consideration of any existing re- gional open space plan. A rich variety of open spaces exists within Yuma County. Only a very small portion of the County is urbanized and over 91% of the unincorporated Yuma County is publicly owned. Much of the federally owned land and a small portion of state owned land in Yuma County is specifically designated and managed as open space areas. A comprehensive inventory of these designated open space areas as required under ARS §11-821(D)(1)(a) is contained in this ele- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF HISTORY of DISCOVERY in the GULF of CALIFORNIA © Richard C
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF DISCOVERY IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA © Richard C. Brusca Vers. 12 June 2021 (All photos by the author, unless otherwise indicated) value of their visits. And there is good FIRST DISCOVERIES evidence that the Seri People (Comcaac) of San Esteban Island, and native people of Archaeological evidence tells us that Native the Baja California peninsula, ate sea lions. Americans were present in northwest Mexico at least 13,000 years ago. Although these hunter-gatherers probably began visiting the shores of the Northern Gulf of California around that time, any early evidence has been lost as sea level has risen with the end of the last ice age. Sea level stabilized ~6000 years ago (ybp), and the earliest evidence of humans along the shores of Sonora and Baja California (otoliths, or fish ear bones from shell middens) is around that age. Excavations of shell middens from the Bahía Adair and Puerto Peñasco region of the Upper Gulf show more-or-less continuous use of the coastal area over the past 6000 years (Middle Archaic Period; based on Salina Grande, on the upper Sonoran coast; radiocarbon dates of charcoal and fish a huge salt flat in which are found artesian otoliths to ~4270 BC). The subsistence springs (pozos) pattern of these midden sites suggests a The famous Covacha Babisuri lifestyle basically identical to that of the archaeological site on Isla Espíritu Santo, in earliest Sand Papago (Areneños, or Hia ced the Southern Gulf, has yielded evidence of O’odham) (see Mitchell et al. 2020). indigenous use that included harvesting and In the coastal shallows, Native working pearls as much as 8,500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • A Resume of the Geology of Arizona 1962 Report
    , , A RESUME of the GEOWGY OF ARIZONA by Eldred D. Wilson, Geologist THE ARIZONA BUREAU OF MINES Bulletin 171 1962 THB UNIVBR.ITY OP ARIZONA. PR••• _ TUC.ON FOREWORD CONTENTS Page This "Resume of the Geology of Arizona," prepared by Dr. Eldred FOREWORD _................................................................................................ ii D. Wilson, Geologist, Arizona Bureau of Mines, is a notable contribution LIST OF TABLES viii to the geologic and mineral resource literature about Arizona. It com­ LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS viii prises a thorough and comprehensive survey of the natural processes and phenomena that have prevailed to establish the present physical setting CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION Purpose and scope I of the State and it will serve as a splendid base reference for continued, Previous work I detailed studies which will follow. Early explorations 1 The Arizona Bureau of Mines is pleased to issue the work as Bulletin Work by U.S. Geological Survey.......................................................... 2 171 of its series of technical publications. Research by University of Arizona 2 Work by Arizona Bureau of Mines 2 Acknowledgments 3 J. D. Forrester, Director Arizona Bureau of Mines CHAPTER -II: ROCK UNITS, STRUCTURE, AND ECONOMIC FEATURES September 1962 Time divisions 5 General statement 5 Methods of dating and correlating 5 Systems of folding and faulting 5 Precambrian Eras ".... 7 General statement 7 Older Precambrian Era 10 Introduction 10 Literature 10 Age assignment 10 Geosynclinal development 10 Mazatzal Revolution 11 Intra-Precambrian Interval 13 Younger Precambrian Era 13 Units and correlation 13 Structural development 17 General statement 17 Grand Canyon Disturbance 17 Economic features of Arizona Precambrian 19 COPYRIGHT@ 1962 Older Precambrian 19 The Board of Regents of the Universities and Younger Precambrian 20 State College of Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement MX: Buried Trench Construction
    ADV-AI0 352 AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND WASHINGTON OC F/G 13/2 NOV 77ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT MX: BURIED TRENCH CONSTRUCTION A--ETCttI) UNCLASSIF IED AFSC-TP-81-50 1 EIIIIlNL *IMENMONEEl IIIIiiiiii EIIhIhIhIoE- Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dal. Enftered) REPORT DOCUMENTATIDN PAPE RFAD INSTRUCTIONS 'EFORFCOMPILETING FORM It REPORT 64UMaER " 2 GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER // AFSC-TR-81-50 . TIT.LE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED Fina"l_ Environmental Impact Statement Final 1977-78 MX: Buried Trench Construction and Test Project- 6 PERFORMING O1G. REPORT NUMBER 7 AUTHOR(s) / B. CONTRACT 0R GRANT NUBER(s) Henningson, Durham & Richardson -- Santa Barbara CA 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS AREAQRK UNIT NUMBERS 63305 6,_, 1 CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE Deputy for Environment and Safety N// Office of the Secretary of the AF(SAF/MIQ) 50- Washington DC 20330 14 MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRESS(,f different fron (,o-troIiing Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report) ICBM System Program office Unclassified Space & Missile Systems Organization (SAMS),. DECLASSI FCATON DOWNGRADING Norton AFB California SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of thi, Report) Unclassified Unlimited J 17 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered ,, Block 20, if different from Report) IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse side if necessary and Identify by block number) Environmental Impact Statements Air Force MX Buried Trench Concept 20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse side If necessary and Identify by block number) The United States Air Force proposes to construct two sections of underground tunnel in the San Cristobal Valley on the Luke Air Force Range in Yuma County, Arizona.
    [Show full text]