DOCSLIB.ORG

JVR FEIR Appendix E Cultural Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JVR FEIR Appendix E Cultural Resources APPENDIX E Cultural Resources Report Part 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT for the JVR ENERGY PARK PROJECT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Lead Agency: County of San Diego Planning and Development Services Contact: Donna Beddow 5510 Overland Ave, Suite 110 San Diego, California 92123 Prepared by: Matthew DeCarlo, MA, Jessica Colston, BA, and Micah Hale, Ph.D., RPA 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Approved by: _________________ Micah Hale, Ph.D., RPA Prepared for: Patrick Brown Director of Development BayWa R.E. Solar Projects, LLC 17901 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1050 Irvine, California 92614 JUNE 2021 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. National Archaeological Database (NADB) Information Authors: Matthew DeCarlo, MA, Jessica Colston, BA, and Micah J. Hale, PhD, RPA Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: BayWa R.E. Solar Projects, LLC 17901 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1050 Irvine, California 92614 Report Date: July 2020 (Updated June 2021) Report Title: Cultural Resources Report for the JVR Energy Park Project, San Diego County, California Type of Study: Survey and Archaeological Evaluation New Sites: CA-SDI-22725, CA-SDI-22726, CA-SDI-22727, CA-SDI-22728, CA-SDI-22729, CA-SDI- 22730, CA-SDI-22731, CA-SDI-22732, CA-SDI-22733, P-37-038609, P-37-038610, P-37- 038611, P-37-038612, P-37-038613, P-37-038614, P-37-038615, P-37-038616, P-37- 038617, P-37-038618, P-37-038619, P-37-038620, P-37-038621, P-37-038622, P-37- 038623, P-37-038624, P-37-038625, P-37-038626, P-37-038627, P-37-038628, P-37- 038629, P-37-038630, P-37-038631, P-37-038632, and P-37-038633 Updated Sites: CA-SDI-4455, CA-SDI-4457/H, CA-SDI-4459, CA-SDI-6741, CA-SDI-7054, CA-SDI-7056, CA- SDI-8072, CA-SDI-8430, CA-SDI-11675, CA-SDI-11676, CA-SDI-11677, CA-SDI- 11681, CA-SDI-11682, CA-SDI-11684, CA-SDI-11685, CA-SDI-11686, CA-SDI-11688, CA-SDI- 11689, CA-SDI-19070, CA-SDI-19904, CA-SDI-19905, CA-SDI-19906, CA-SDI- 19907, CA- SDI-19908, CA-SDI-19909, CA-SDI-19910, CA-SDI-21758, CA-SDI-21764, and P-37- 030190 USGS Quads: Jacumba Overextended South, CA/BC 1:24,000; T 18 S, R 8 E; Section 4, 5, 8, and 9. Acreage: 1,356 acres (Project Area); 643 626 acres (ADI) Permit Numbers: PDS2018-MUP-18-022 Keywords: Inventory; Evaluation; lithic scatter; groundstone; flakedstone tool; retouched flake; simple flake tool; millingstone; debitage; quarry; shovel test pit; surface collection; shovel scrape; not significant; not eligible; CRHR; CA-SDI-4455, CA-SDI-4457/H, CA-SDI-4459, CA-SDI- 6741, CA-SDI-7054, CA-SDI-7056, CA-SDI-8072, CA-SDI-8430, CA-SDI-11675, CA-SDI- 11676, CA-SDI-11677, CA-SDI-11681, CA-SDI-11682, CA-SDI-11684, CA-SDI-11685, CA- SDI-11686, CA-SDI-11688, CA-SDI-11689, CA-SDI-19070, CA-SDI-19904, CA-SDI-19905, CA-SDI-19906, CA-SDI-19907, CA-SDI-19908, CA-SDI-19909, CA-SDI-19910, CA-SDI- 21758, CA-SDI-21764, CA-SDI-22725, CA-SDI-22726, CA-SDI-22727, CA-SDI- 22728, CA- SDI-22729, CA-SDI-22730, CA-SDI-22731, CA-SDI-22732, CA-SDI-22733, P-37-030190, 10743 i June 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE JVR ENERGY PARK PROJECT P-37-038609, P-37-038610, P-37-038611, P-37-038612, P-37-038613, P-37-038614, P-37-038615, P-37-038616, P-37-038617, P-37-038618, P-37-038619, P-37-038620, P-37-038621, P-37-038622, P-37-038623, P-37-038624, P-37-038625, P-37-038626, P-37-038627, P-37-038628, P-37-038629, P-37-038630, P-37-038631, P-37-038632, P-37-038633 10743 ii June 2021 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE (NADB) INFORMATION ................................................................................. I LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. VII MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Project Area and Area of Direct Impacts ................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Indirect Impacts Area of Potential Effects ............................................................................... 2 1.2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Records Search Results ........................................................................................................ 15 1.3 Applicable Regulations ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.3.1 State Level Regulations ......................................................................................................... 21 1.3.2 San Diego County Local Register of Historical Resources .................................................. 22 1.3.3 County of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO) ............................................... 23 2.0 GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................................... 25 2.1 County of San Diego ............................................................................................................................ 25 2.2 CEQA ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN ........................................................................................................................................ 29 3.1 Integrity and Structure of Archaeological Deposits ........................................................................... 29 3.2 Chronological Placement .................................................................................................................... 30 3.3 Settlement and Site Function ............................................................................................................. 31 3.4 Subsistence ......................................................................................................................................... 33 3.5 Prehistoric Quarrying ........................................................................................................................... 33 4.0 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EFFECTS ................................................................................................................... 35 4.1 Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 35 4.1.1 Field Methods ........................................................................................................................ 35 4.1.2 Native American Correspondence and Participation ........................................................... 37 5.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Inventory Results ................................................................................................................................. 39 5.1.1 Archaeological Resources within the ADI ............................................................................. 41 5.1.2 Surveyed Archaeological Resources within Project Area .................................................... 55 5.2 Project Artifact Recovery Summary .................................................................................................... 58 5.3 Summary of Cultural Resources Investigations in the JVR Project Area .......................................... 59 10743 iii June 2021 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE JVR ENERGY PARK PROJECT 6.0 INTERPRETATION OF RESOURCE IMPORTANCE AND IMPACT IDENTIFICATION ........................................... 63 6.1 Resource Importance and Management Concerns .......................................................................... 63 6.1.1 Jacumba Valley Archaeological District (JVAD) .................................................................... 65 6.1.2 Integrity ................................................................................................................................... 65 6.1.3 Chronology.............................................................................................................................. 65 6.1.4 Settlement and Site Function ............................................................................................... 67 6.2 Resource Importance and Evaluation of Tested Sites .......................................................................... 67 6.3 Impact Identification ........................................................................................................................... 68 6.4 Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 69 7.0 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS— MITIGATION MEASURES AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .................. 71 7.1 Unavoidable Impacts ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wessex Article Master Page 29/11/2012 11:41 Page 51
    McNabb and Beaumont _Wessex Article Master Page 29/11/2012 11:41 Page 51 Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 78, 2011, pp. 51–71 Excavations in the Acheulean Levels at the Earlier Stone Age Site of Canteen Koppie, Northern Province, South Africa By JOHN MCNABB1 and PETER BEAUMONT2 The fluvial gravels of the river Vaal in South Africa have long been known as a source for Earlier Stone Age (ESA) artefacts. Most were discovered through the open cast mining for diamonds that has left very little in situ fluvial sediment remaining today. The site of Canteen Koppie is an internationally famous location with a reputation for prolific Acheulean artefacts, especially handaxes and the enigmatic prepared core and Levallois-like technology known as Victoria West. Our understanding of this site, and most other Vaal locations, is almost solely based on highly selected artefact collections. Here, we report on the first controlled excavations ever to be conducted at Canteen Koppie. The deposits are likely to date to the Early and Middle Pleistocene, and our excavations sample the full depth of the stratigraphic sequence. The lower units, first identified in these excavations, add a considerable time depth to the Acheulean occupation of the site, making this the longest chrono-stratigraphic sequence in South Africa to our knowledge. Given the current international interest in the origins of Levallois/prepared core technology (PCT), its occurrence in Unit 2b Upper, and its presence alongside Victoria West technology in Unit 2a has significant implications for debates on the role of Victoria West in the origins of PCT.
    [Show full text]
  • Early and Middle Woodland Campsites on Three Mile Island
    r t ~ ..... I. .. ~, .....: .~ ~.:. " ,.-..,;;' ;-...... ~: '. "':.- '.~ : . ,,' . ~. -'.; . .~: .. ; . .,:" "<;r': PEN EARLY AND IUDDLE WOODLAND CAMPSITES ON THREE MILE ISLAND, DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNS~LVANIA by Ira F. Smith III Field Archaeologist and Associate Curator Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Metropolitan Edison Company Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Project Pennsylvania Historical and Museum commission William Penn Memorial Museum Harrisburg, Pennsylvania January, 1977 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded by a grant to the Pennsylvania aistorical and Museum Commission from the Metropolitan Edison Company. The author would like to acknowledge this grant and also Dr. W. Fred Kinsey III, Director of the North Museum in Lancaster, who arranged to have the money administered by Franklin and Marshall College. The author would especially like to acknowledge the codirector of the project, Dr. Barry C. Kent, Pennsylvania state Archaeologist. An expression of appreciation is due to various members of the Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology, Inc., particularly Mr. William Taylor and Mr. Thomas Carroll, who helped to locate and excavate several of the archaeological sites. Thanks also to Mr. Robert Ditchburn, crew chief, and to crew members Donald Boggart, David Ferrell, and Eugene Erwin. I am deeply indebted and grateful to Mr. James T. Herbstritt who prepared the line drawings used in Figures 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 18. Finally, I would like to thank Mr. Donald H. Culp, artist for the William Penn Memorial Museum, for his assistance in preparing the remaining illustrations for publication. iii ABSTRACT Archaeological investigation in 1967 at Three Mile Island, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania revealed in situ evidence of Early and Middle Woodland occupation in the Lower Susquehanna River Valley•.
    [Show full text]
  • Flaked Stone Tool Patterning As a Means for Inferring Fremont Obsidian Procurement and Exchange
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Flaked Stone Tool Patterning as a Means for Inferring Fremont Obsidian Procurement and Exchange Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8v9634v1 Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 28(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Andrews, Bradford W. Greubel, Rand A. Publication Date 2008 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 28. Ilo. 1 (2008) | pp. 23-41 Flaked Stone Tool Patterning as a Means for Inferring Fremont Obsidian Procurement and Exchange BRADFORD W. ANDREWS Department of Anthropology, Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma,WA 98447-0003 RAND A. GREUBEL Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc., P.O. Box 2075, Montrose, CO 81402-2075 The Hunchback Shelter (42BE751), located in the southeastern Great Basin, yielded a considerable amount of data on the prehistoric use of the site. Located adjacent to the Wild Horse Canyon and Schoo Mine obsidian sources, evidence indicates that Hunchback Shelter functioned as a camp where Archaic to Formative (Fremont) knappers produced both bifaces and expedient flake cores. The intent of these procurement visits appears to have shifted over time. Furthermore, the Fremont visits appear to be consistent with comparative evidence from Five Finger Ridge, a major Fremont village. These findings have important implications for understanding the relationship between procurement behavior and settlement structure, and the relative importance ofbiface versus core technologies during the Fremont period. 0CATED IN THE SOUTHEASTERN Great Basin of residentiaUy mobile foragers to more logistically-based, 1^ Utah (Fig. 1), the Hunchback Sheher (42BE751) is semi-sedentary or sedentary forager/farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Archaeology and Anthropology in the Western Pacific in Honour of Jim Specht
    www.amonline.net.au/publications/ ISBN 0-9750476-2-0 RECORDS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM CONTENTS RECORDS OF THE Jim Specht's brilliant career—a tribute .................................................................................... ......................................PAUL S.C. TAÇON, JACK GOLSON, KIRK HUFFMAN & DES GRIFFIN 1 Jim Specht: a bibliography ................................................................................. KATE KHAN 9 AUSTRALIAN Holocene vegetation, savanna origins and human settlement of Guam ................................ ................................................................................J. STEPHEN ATHENS & JEROME V. W ARD 15 The effect of objects: the return of a north Vanuatu textile from the Australian Museum to the Vanuatu Cultural Centre ............................................................................ LISSANT BOLTON 31 MUSEUM Ownership and a peripatetic collection: Raymond Firth’s Collection from Tikopia, Solomon Islands ................................................................................................. ELIZABETH BONSHEK 37 Early agriculture in the highlands of New Guinea: an assessment of Phase 1 at Kuk Swamp .......................................................................................................................... TIM DENHAM 47 Settlement history and landscape use in Santo, Vanuatu ...... JEAN-CHRISTOPHE GALIPAUD 59 A century of collecting: colonial collectors in southwest New Britain ................................. .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Form and Function in the Lower Palaeolithic: History, Progress, and Continued Relevance
    doi 10.4436/jass.95017 JASs Invited Reviews Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 95 (2017), pp. 67-108 Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance Alastair J. M. Key1 & Stephen J. Lycett2 1) School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected] 2) Department of Anthropology (Evolutionary Anthropology Laboratory), University at Buffalo, SUNY, Amherst, NY 14261, U.S.A. Summary - Percussively flaked stone artefacts constitute a major source of evidence relating to hominin behavioural strategies and are, essentially, a product or byproduct of a past individual’s decision to create a tool with respect to some broader goal. Moreover, it has long been noted that both differences and recurrent regularities exist within and between Palaeolithic stone artefact forms. Accordingly, archaeologists have frequently drawn links between form and functionality, with functional objectives and performance often being regarded consequential to a stone tool’s morphological properties. Despite these factors, extensive reviews of the related concepts of form and function with respect to the Lower Palaeolithic remain surprisingly sparse. We attempt to redress this issue. First we stress the historical place of form–function concepts, and their role in establishing basic ideas that echo to this day. We then highlight methodological and conceptual progress in determining artefactual function in more recent years. Thereafter, we evaluate four specific issues that are of direct consequence for evaluating the ongoing relevance of form–function concepts, especially with respect to their relevance for understanding human evolution more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Tool Technologies
    Grinding: The flaked or pecked flake or core is later grounded on a stone slab to Tool Families get the required shape and size with the production of a working edge. Polishing: The axes so prepared are now having a more or less smooth and regular surface. These are now rubbed on hard granite stone with sand and water thrown in from time to time. The result of this action creates on axe which, unless told, can be mistaken as a metal axe. It is so shining. Usually all axes are biconvex in cross-section. These are, however, some which are plano-convex in cross section. These are believed to be used for chiseling. These are called ‘Adzes’. Some Adzes have an elongated body and a slightly narrowed anterior end. These are called ‘Shoe-last celts’, on the assumption that these were probably hafted as a shoe to the primitive ploughs. Finally another type that emerges with this technique is called a ‘Ring Stone’. There are flat round stones in the centre of which a hole is made using a spindle with hard quartz as the tip. The extremely varied size and shape of these ring stones make it very difficult to comment on their probable function. The general view is that the massive ones were probably used as mace head for pounding crops, while the small ones were probably used as net sinkers in nets used for fishing. 2.6 SUMMARY In the journey of human evolution if we will see and analyse the past then we can say our ancestors have spent 90% of their life in Stone Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Analysis Bibliography & Glossary
    HANDOUT 1 — Lithics Description & Analysis [4/2012] Annotated Bibliography & Glossary Adams, Jenny L. 1999 Refocusing the Role of Food-Grinding Tools as Correlates for Subsistence Strategies in the U.S. Southwest. American Antiquity 64(3):475–498. [focuses on replication, use wear, residues] 2002 Ground Stone Analysis: A Technological Approach. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. [discusses analysis and classification based on design, manufacture and use] Addington, Lucille 1986 Lithic Illustration: Drawing Flaked Stone Artifacts for Publication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Amick, Daniel S., and Raymond P. Mauldin (editors) 1989 Experiments in Lithic Technology. BAR International Series 528. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford. [includes several examples of replication experiments] Andrefsky, William, Jr. 1994 Raw-Material Availability and the Organization of Technology. American Antiquity 59(1):21–34. 2005 Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, New York. [instructional textbook on lithic analysis from the perspective of western USA biface technology] 2006 Experimental and Archaeological Verification of an Index of Retouch for Hafted Bifaces. American Antiquity 71(4):743–757. [examines resharpening, reuse, and curation issues] Bamforth, Douglas B. 2006 The Windy Ridge Quartzite Quarry: Hunter-Gatherer Mining and Hunter- Gatherer Land Use on the North American Continental Divide. World Archaeology 38(3):511–527. [on one of the largest Colorado sites] Barnett, Franklin 1991 Dictionary of Prehistoric Indian Artifacts of the American Southwest. Northland Publishing Co., Flagstaff, AZ. Barton, C. Michael 1996 Beyond the Graver: Reconsidering Burin Function. Journal of Field Archaeology 23(1):111–125. [well-illustrated, but specific topic] Benedict, James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Titel Der Dissertation
    Detecting microscopic aspects of Late Pleistocene to Early/Mid Holocene lithic technology in Island Southeast Asia: Perspectives from North and Central Sulawesi Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Mr. Riczar Fuentes aus Sara, Iloilo, Philippines Tübingen 2019 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 16.01.2020 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Nicholas Conard 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Alfred Pawlik Detecting microscopic aspects of Late Pleistocene to Early/Mid Holocene lithic technology in Island Southeast Asia: perspectives from North and Central Sulawesi Submitted by: Riczar B. Fuentes, M.A. Ph.D. Candidate Abteilung für Frühgeschichte und Quartärökologie Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters Faculty of Science Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Submitted to: Prof. Nicholas J. Conard, Ph.D. Adviser Abteilung für Frühgeschichte und Quartärökologie Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters Faculty of Science Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Alfred F. Pawlik Co-adviser Department of Sociology and Anthropology Ateneo de Manila University 1 Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Results of Lithic Experiments Performed on Glass Cores Are Applicable to Other Raw Materials
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2020) 12: 44 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00963-9 ORIGINAL PAPER The results of lithic experiments performed on glass cores are applicable to other raw materials Tamara Dogandžić1,2 & Aylar Abdolazadeh2 & George Leader2,3,4 & Li Li2,5 & Shannon P. McPherron1 & Claudio Tennie5 & Harold L. Dibble2 Received: 29 April 2019 /Accepted: 2 December 2019 /Published online: 22 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract About 10 years ago, a new experimental design, based on a mechanical flaking apparatus, allowed complete control over several independent variables essential to flintknapping. This experimental setting permitted the investigation of more fundamental aspects of stone technology, including the effect of particular platform attributes, core surface morphology, and the application of force on flake size and shape. These experiments used cores made of glass that were molded to exact configurations. Here we set out to investigate whether results obtained from experiments on glass cores can be extended to other materials, in this case varieties of basalt, flint, and obsidian that were cut to the exact core configurations. We focused on the relationships between the independent variables of exterior platform angle and platform depth and dependent variables of overall size (weight or mass), volume, and linear dimensions. It was found that in almost every comparison, all four materials show similar relationships in nature and degree. What differs instead is the amount of force needed to detach a flake. In other words, given the same core morphology and platform attributes the resulting flakes will be the same, but harder materials require more force to remove the flake.
    [Show full text]
  • Validity in Lithic Debitage Analysis
    VALIDITY IN LITHIC DEBITAGE ANALYSIS : AN EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMPARING QUARTZITE TO OBSIDIAN DONNA M. MORRISON B.A. (Honours), Trent University 1990 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the faculty of Archaeology O Donna M. Morrison 1994 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY May 1994 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME Donna M. Morrison DEGREE TITLE VALIDITY IN LITHIC DEBITAGE ANALYSIS: AN EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMPARING QUARTZITE TO OBSIDIAN WININGCOMMITI'EE: Chah Dr. Jonathan Driver '\ pi.Brian Hayden Senior Supervisor T w - ~r.Jackkance Professor Simon Fraser University Dr. David Pokotylo Associate Professor Department of Anthropology and Sociology University of British Columbia Date Approved: May 17,1994 PARTIAL COPY RIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of ThesisIDissertation: VALIDITY IN LlTHlC DEBITAGE ANALYSIS: AN I EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMPARING Author: - _-U I- - - - Signature Donna M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Experimental Knapping in Empirically Testing Key Themes in the Evolution of Lithic Technology: Reduction Intensity, Efficiency and Behavioural Complexity
    The role of experimental knapping in empirically testing key themes in the evolution of lithic technology: reduction intensity, efficiency and behavioural complexity Antoine Muller BA (archaeology) BA Honours (archaeology) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2017 School of Social Science Abstract Experimental knapping has complimented and stimulated lithic analyses for over a century. Throughout this period, the discipline has witnessed an increase in the scientific rigour and theoretical grounding with which these studies are conducted. This thesis charts these key trends and in doing so establishes a best-practice model of experimental knapping, the veracity of which is in turn tested using four new lithic experiments. These case-studies employ experimental knapping to advance our understanding of flake platform measurement, reduction intensity, technological efficiency, and behavioural complexity. The first case-study, Chapter 3, offers a more accurate and precise calliper-based method of flake platform measurement that relies on simple geometric approximations of platform shape rather than the inflexible and unreliable existing method of multiplying platform width by thickness. In Chapter 4, a new reduction intensity metric for backed blades, a hitherto overlooked tool-type, is developed and tested on the backed blades from an early Neolithic site in Turkey. This new metric allows a reconstruction of the raw material consumption patterns at the site, finding that the backed blades likely contributed to conserving the inhabitants’ scarce lithic raw material. Meanwhile, Chapter 5 outlines the results of a comparison of the raw material efficiency of eight different lithic technologies, finding that lithic technological efficiency was a generally ascending trend over the last 3.3 million years and that the main transition in efficiency occurred between the Lower to Middle Palaeolithic.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Lithic Debitage from Mound C at the Winterville Mounds Archaeological Site (22WS500)
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-11-2012 An Analysis of Lithic Debitage From Mound C at the Winterville Mounds Archaeological Site (22WS500) Barbara McClendon University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation McClendon, Barbara, "An Analysis of Lithic Debitage From Mound C at the Winterville Mounds Archaeological Site (22WS500)" (2012). Honors Theses. 46. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/46 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi AN ANALYSIS OF LITHIC DEBITAGE FROM MOUND C AT THE WINTERVILLE MOUNDS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (22WS500) By Barbara E. McClendon A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of Anthropology March 2012 ii iii Approved by ___________________________________ H. Edwin Jackson Professor of Anthropology ___________________________________ Amy Chasteen Miller, Chair Department of Anthropology and Sociology ____________________________________ David R. Davies, Dean Honors College iv Abstract The Winterville Mounds, located in Northwest Mississippi, was once home to one of the largest chiefdoms in the Southeast. It served as a both a religious and political center and housed the ruling class atop its twenty-three manmade mounds. Recent excavation on Mound C at Winterville has uncovered an unusually large quantity of lithic artifacts.
    [Show full text]