WO 2019/002633 Al 03 January 2019 (03.01.2019) W !P O PCT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WO 2019/002633 Al 03 January 2019 (03.01.2019) W !P O PCT (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/002633 Al 03 January 2019 (03.01.2019) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Published: A61K 39/00 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) — with international search report (Art. 21(3)) A61K 35/17 (2015.01) (21) International Application Number: PCT/EP2018/067857 (22) International Filing Date: 02 July 2018 (02.07.2018) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Language: English (30) Priority Data: PA201770542 30 June 2017 (30.06.2017) DK PCT/EP20 17/076798 19 October 2017 (19.10.2017) EP PCT/EP2018/053343 09 February 2018 (09.02.2018) EP (71) Applicant: CELLECTIS [FR/FR] ; 8 Rue de la Croix Jarry, 75013 Paris (FR). = (72) Inventors: SOURDIVE, David; 19, rue Louise Michel, = 92300 Levallois-Perret (FR). DUCLERT, Aymeric; 6 = ter rue Victorine, 94100 St Maur des Fosses (FR). SI- = MON, Mathieu; 76, Avenue Mozart, 75016 Paris (FR). = DUCHATEAU, Philippe; Bateau Fawen Quai des Dames, ≡ 91210 Draveil (FR). WILLIAMS, Alan Marc; 246 1, 8th = avenue, #2A, New York City, New York 10027 (US). ≡ POIROT, Laurant; 10 rue de la reunion, 75020 Paris (FR). ≡ (74) Agent: ZACCO DENMARK A S; Arne Jacobsens Alle = 15, 2300 K0benhavn S (DK). = (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every ~ kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, = AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, = CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, = DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, ≡ HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, = KR, KW,KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY,MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, = OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, ≡ SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, = TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every = kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, = GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). © (54) Title: CELLULAR IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR REPETITIVE ADMINISTRATION (57) Abstract: The present invention provides composition kits and methods for treating cancer in a human by immunotherapy using successive doses of CAR-T cells with no or reduced anamnestic immune reaction in one individual (P). CELLU LAR IM M UNOTH ERAPY FO R REPETITIVE ADM INISTRATION FI ELD O F THE INVENTION The present invention relates t o a set of n pharmaceutical unit doses comprising engineered cells and a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle, suitable for cellular immunotherapy, inducing no or reduced anamnestic response. BACKGROUND O F THE INVENTION Adoptive immunotherapy is one of the promising strategies t o treat diseases such as viral infections or cancer. The cells used for adoptive immunotherapy can be generated either by differentiation of immune cell progenitors, expansion of antigen-specific T-cells or redirection of T- cells or of differentiated immune cell progenitors through genetic engineering (Park, Rosenberg et al. 2011). For directing cells towards specific pathological cells, transgenic T-cell receptors (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) can be successfully expressed at the cell surface, even in the absence of endogenous TCR. These synthetic receptors comprise a targeting moiety that is associated with one or more signaling domains in a single fusion molecule or consists in several non-covalently linked transmembrane domains as described in (WO2014039523A1). In numerous studies, the binding moiety of a CAR can redirect the activity of the immune cells expressing it, towards a specific molecule, preferably expressed on a tumor or pathological cell. Thus, single-chain antibody (scFv), comprising the light and heavy variable fragments of a monoclonal antibody joined by a flexible linker can be very efficient. Binding moieties based on receptor or ligand domains have also been used successfully. Such extracellular domains are linked t o signaling domains initially derived from the cytoplasmic region of the CD28, CD3zeta, 4-1BB or from the Fc receptor gamma chains in CAR of first, second and third generations. Binding of CAR t o pathological cells results in signaling and triggers a cascade of events including degranulation, release of cytokines, and eventually leading t o the destruction of target cells. Thus, CARs allow cytotoxic T-cells t o be re-directed against specific antigens expressed at the surface of tumor cells including lymphomas (Jena, Dotti et al. 2010) and destruction of these target cells. The current protocol for the treatment of patients using adoptive immunotherapy is based on autologous cell transfer. Under this approach, T lymphocytes recovered from a given patient, are genetically modified or selected ex vivo, cultivated in vitro in order to amplify the number of cells and finally re-infused into the patient. Autologous transfer of engineered immune cells was reported to induce undesired immune reaction including cytokine storm, GVHD (that may be an autoimmune disease), or immune reaction against the edited molecules that sometimes comprised mouse antibody fragments ( Villa NY, Rahman MM, McFadden G, Cogle CR. Therapeutics for Graft -versus-Host Disease: From Conventional Therapies to Novel Virotherapeutic Strategies. Lamfers MLM, Chiocca EA, eds. Viruses. 2016;8(3):85. doi:10.3390/v8030085). In addition, autologous therapies face su bstantial technical and logistic hurdles to practical application; their generation requires expensive dedicated facilities and expert personnel, they must be generated in a short time following a patient's diagnosis, and in many cases, pretreatment of the patient has resulted in degraded immune function, such that the patient's lymphocytes may be present in low numbers, may be poorly functional or even dysfunctional. Because of these hurdles, each patient's autologous cell preparation is effectively a new product, resulting in substantial variations in efficacy and safety. To answer the need of providing engineered cells that could be used in all patients with limited undesired immune reaction against the host, cells from healthy individuals engineered to destroy cancer cells may be used. However, T cells from one individual when transferred to another individual can be detrimental to the host resulting in graft versus host disease (GvHD) and leading t o potentially serious tissue damage and death. The molecular mechanisms responsible for acute or chronic GVHD have been at least partially identified. Recognition of MHC disparities between the donor and recipient through specific TCR(s) that can lead to T cells proliferation and t o the development of GvHD in recipients of allogeneic cells. To overcome this problem, new techniques of gene editing have been used to reduce the expression of TCR genes encoding the various subunits of the endogenous TCR (Domain-swapped T cell receptors improve the safety of TCR gene therapy. (Bethune MT, Gee MH, Bunse M, et al. Domain-swapped T cell receptors improve the safety of TCR gene therapy. Rath S, ed. eLife. 2016;5:el9095. doi:10.7554/eLife.l9095). Thus, so called "Allogeneic TCR KO therapeutic cells" or "off the shelve- ready to use- CART cells" have been engineered to be redirected against pathological cells, cancerous, or infected and to induce no or reduced GVHD. Infusion of such TCR-KO cells into patients significantly reduced GVHD or significantly reduces the risk of GVHD and increased survival in patients suffering refractory AML in at least two pediatric patients (Gray N, 2016. http://www. biopharmadive.com/news/cellectis-t-cell- therapy-clears-leukemia-in-second-baby/418862/). One problem met with allogeneic cell therapy or organ transplant, or even with autologous cell therapies or grafts expressing ectopic antigens, lies in a possible immunological reaction and rejection of grafted cells, tissues or organs (the "Graft") when an individual has been previously exposed to one or more antigen(s) present on the Graft (born by cells) and not tolerated by the immune system. In case of re exposure to said antigen, an "Anamnestic Response" is likely to reject efficiently and/or rapidly the Graft. Such situations are known to happen especially when the graft bears macromolecular features (e.g. proteins, sugars, lipids or combinations thereof) that are not present in the grafted individual (or not tolerated by its immune system). The case is observed when the grafts bear molecules, such as HLA alleles products, that are different from those of the individual if the individual has been exposed to, in the past. Graft rejection due to an anamnestic response that involves different compartments of the immune system. Thus, the rejected antigen(s) are recognized by antibodies and/or by specific receptors of T lymphocytes (TCRs). Yet it may be desirable t o perform two or more consecutive Grafts and to minimize anamnestic Responses (any immune response due to repeated exposure), especially for treating solid cancer. Thus, when using adoptive engineered T-cell immunotherapy t o target antigens born by cancer cells, it may be useful to make repeated and consecutive treatments targeting the same or different antigen of the same cancer marker. It may be also useful to make successive treatments targeting a different antigen in case of new, or relapse or even refractory cancer.
Recommended publications
  • Phenotype Microarrays Panels PM-M1 to PM-M14
    Phenotype MicroArrays™ Panels PM-M1 to PM-M14 for Phenotypic Characterization of Mammalian Cells Assays: Energy Metabolism Pathways Ion and Hormone Effects on Cells Sensitivity to Anti-Cancer Agents and for Optimizing Culture Conditions for Mammalian Cells PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE PM-M1 Cat. #13101 PM-M2 Cat. #13102 PM-M3 Cat. #13103 PM-M4 Cat. #13104 PM-M5 Cat. #13105 PM-M6 Cat. #13106 PM-M7 Cat. #13107 PM-M8 Cat. #13108 PM-M11 Cat. #13111 PM-M12 Cat. #13112 PM-M13 Cat. #13113 PM-M14 Cat. #13114 © 2016 Biolog, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 00P 134 Rev F February 2020 - 1 - CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2 a. Overview ................................................................................................... 2 b. Background ............................................................................................... 2 c. Uses ........................................................................................................... 2 d. Advantages ................................................................................................ 3 II. Product Description, PM-M1 to M4 ................................................................ 3 III. Protocols, PM-M1 to M4 ................................................................................. 7 a. Materials Required .................................................................................... 7 b. Determination
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genotoxicity of Adriamycin and Menogarol, Two Anthracycline Antitumor Agents
    [CANCER RESEARCH 43, 5293-5297, November 1983] Comparative Genotoxicity of Adriamycin and Menogarol, Two Anthracycline Antitumor Agents B. K. Bhuyan,1 D. M. Zimmer, J. H. Mazurek, R. J. Trzos, P. R. Harbach, V. S. Shu, and M. A. Johnson Departments of Cancer Research [B. K. B.. D. M. Z.], Pathology and Toxicology Research [J. H. M., R. J. T., P. R. H.], and Biostatist/cs [V. S. S., M. A. J.], The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001 ABSTRACT murine tumors such as P388 and L1210 leukemias and B16 melanoma (13). However, the biochemical activity of Adriamycin Adriamycin and menogarol are anthracyclines which cause and menogarol were markedly different in the following respects, more than 100% increase in life span of mice bearing P388 (a) at cytotoxic doses, Adriamycin inhibited RNA synthesis much leukemia and B16 melanoma. Unlike Adriamycin, menogarol more than DNA synthesis in L1210 cells in culture (10). In does not bind strongly to ONA, and it minimally inhibits DNA and contrast, menogarol caused very little inhibition of RNA or DNA RNA synthesis at lethal doses. Adriamycin is a clinically active synthesis at cytotoxic doses (10); (b) Adriamycin interacted drug, and menogarol is undergoing preclinical toxicology at Na strongly with DNA, in contrast to the weak interaction seen with tional Cancer Institute. In view of the reported mutagenicity of menogarol (10); (c) cells in S phase were most sensitive to Adriamycin, we have compared the genotoxicity of the two Adriamycin as compared to maximum toxicity of menogarol to drugs. Our results show that, although Adriamycin and meno cells in Gì(5).These results collectively suggested that meno garol differ significantly in their bacterial mutagenicity (Ames garol acts through some mechanism other than the intercalative assay), they have similar genotoxic activity in several mammalian DNA binding proposed for Adriamycin.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Instability Confers Intrinsic Multidrug Resistance
    Cancer Therapeutics, Targets, and Chemical Biology Research Chromosomal Instability Confers Intrinsic Multidrug Resistance Alvin J.X. Lee1, David Endesfelder1,4, Andrew J. Rowan1, Axel Walther5,6, Nicolai J. Birkbak7, P. Andrew Futreal8, Julian Downward2, Zoltan Szallasi7,9, Ian P.M. Tomlinson5, Michael Howell3, Maik Kschischo4, and Charles Swanton1,6 Abstract Aneuploidy is associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors. Spontaneous chromosome missegregation events in aneuploid cells promote chromosomal instability (CIN) that may contribute to the acquisition of multidrug resistance in vitro and heighten risk for tumor relapse in animal models. Identification of distinct therapeutic agents that target tumor karyotypic complexity has important clinical implications. To identify distinct therapeutic approaches to specifically limit the growth of CIN tumors, we focused on a panel of þ colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines, previously classified as either chromosomally unstable (CIN ) or diploid/near- À diploid (CIN ), and treated them individually with a library of kinase inhibitors targeting components of signal þ transduction, cell cycle, and transmembrane receptor signaling pathways. CIN cell lines displayed significant À intrinsic multidrug resistance compared with CIN cancer cell lines, and this seemed to be independent of somatic mutation status and proliferation rate. Confirming the association of CIN rather than ploidy status with multidrug resistance, tetraploid isogenic cells that had arisen from diploid cell lines displayed lower drug sensitivity than their diploid parental cells only with increasing chromosomal heterogeneity and isogenic cell þ À line models of CIN displayed multidrug resistance relative to their CIN parental cancer cell line derivatives. In þ a meta-analysis of CRC outcome following cytotoxic treatment, CIN predicted worse progression-free or À disease-free survival relative to patients with CIN disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibodies Products
    Chapter 2 : Gentaur Products List • Human Signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit • Human Sjoegren syndrome nuclear autoantigen 1 SSNA1 • Human Small proline rich protein 2A SPRR2A ELISA kit SEC11A SEC11A ELISA kit SpeciesHuman ELISA kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptidase complex catalytic subunit • Human Sjoegren syndrome scleroderma autoantigen 1 • Human Small proline rich protein 2B SPRR2B ELISA kit SEC11C SEC11C ELISA kit SpeciesHuman SSSCA1 ELISA kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptidase complex subunit 1 SPCS1 ELISA • Human Ski oncogene SKI ELISA kit SpeciesHuman • Human Small proline rich protein 2D SPRR2D ELISA kit kit SpeciesHuman • Human Ski like protein SKIL ELISA kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptidase complex subunit 2 SPCS2 ELISA • Human Skin specific protein 32 C1orf68 ELISA kit • Human Small proline rich protein 2E SPRR2E ELISA kit kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptidase complex subunit 3 SPCS3 ELISA • Human SLAIN motif containing protein 1 SLAIN1 ELISA kit • Human Small proline rich protein 2F SPRR2F ELISA kit kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptide CUB and EGF like domain • Human SLAIN motif containing protein 2 SLAIN2 ELISA kit • Human Small proline rich protein 2G SPRR2G ELISA kit containing protein 2 SCUBE2 ELISA kit SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman SpeciesHuman • Human Signal peptide CUB and EGF like domain • Human SLAM family member 5 CD84 ELISA kit • Human Small proline rich protein 3 SPRR3 ELISA kit containing protein
    [Show full text]
  • Personalized Chemotherapy Profiling Using Cancer Cell Lines from Selectable Mice
    Published OnlineFirst January 22, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2127 Clinical Cancer Cancer Therapy: Preclinical Research Personalized Chemotherapy Profiling Using Cancer Cell Lines from Selectable Mice Hirohiko Kamiyama1, Sherri Rauenzahn1, Joong Sup Shim2, Collins A. Karikari1, Georg Feldmann1, Li Hua1, Mihoko Kamiyama1, F. William Schuler3, Ming-Tseh Lin1, Robert M. Beaty1, Balasubramanyam Karanam1, Hong Liang1, Michael E. Mullendore1, Guanglan Mo3, Manuel Hidalgo3, Elizabeth Jaffee3, Ralph H. Hruban1,3, H.A. Jinnah4, Richard B.S. Roden1, Antonio Jimeno3, Jun O. Liu2, Anirban Maitra1,3, and James R. Eshleman1,3 Abstract Purpose: High-throughput chemosensitivity testing of low-passage cancer cell lines can be used to prioritize agents for personalized chemotherapy. However, generating cell lines from primary cancers is difficult because contaminating stromal cells overgrow the malignant cells. Experimental Design: We produced a series of hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt)-null immunodeficient mice. During growth of human cancers in these mice, hprt-null murine stromal cells replace their human counterparts. Results: Pancreatic and ovarian cancers explanted from these mice were grown in selection media to produce pure human cancer cell lines. We screened one cell line with a 3,131-drug panel and identified 77 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved drugs with activity, and two novel drugs to which the cell line was uniquely sensitive. Xenografts of this carcinoma were selectively responsive to both drugs. Conclusion: Chemotherapy can be personalized using patient-specific cell lines derived in biochemically selectable mice. Clin Cancer Res; 19(5); 1139–46. Ó2012 AACR. Introduction to respond to specific drugs. In vitro chemotherapy sensi- Selecting the most appropriate chemotherapy for a given tivity and resistance assays (CSRA), a natural extrapolation patient has historically been based on histopathology and of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, was first reported in past studies showing that specific drugs are generally active 1957 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • C07k - 2021.08
    CPC - C07K - 2021.08 C07K PEPTIDES (peptides in foodstuffs A23; obtaining protein compositions for foodstuffs, working-up proteins for foodstuffs A23J; preparations for medicinal purposes A61K; peptides containing beta-lactam rings C07D; cyclic dipeptides not having in their molecule any other peptide link than those which form their ring, e.g. piperazine-2,5-diones, C07D; ergot alkaloids of the cyclic peptide type C07D 519/02; macromolecular compounds having statistically distributed amino acid units in their molecules, i.e. when the preparation does not provide for a specific; but for a random sequence of the amino acid units, homopolyamides and block copolyamides derived from amino acids C08G 69/00; macromolecular products derived from proteins C08H 1/00; preparation of glue or gelatine C09H; single cell proteins, enzymes C12N; genetic engineering processes for obtaining peptides C12N 15/00; compositions for measuring or testing processes involving enzymes C12Q; investigation or analysis of biological material G01N 33/00) Relationships with other classification places An amino acid per se is classified in C07D while peptides (starting from dipeptides) are classified in C07K. Subclass C07K is a function oriented entry for the compounds themselves and does not cover the application or use of the compounds under the subclass definition. For classifying such information other entries exist, for example: preservation of bodies of humans or animals or plants or parts thereof; Biocides, e.g. as disinfectants, as pesticides, as herbicides; pest repellants or attractants; plant growth regulators are classified in A01N. Preparations for medical, dental, or toilet purposes are classified in A61K. Amino acids or derivatives thereof are classified in C07C or C07D.
    [Show full text]
  • Sox2 Promotes Malignancy in Glioblastoma by Regulating
    Volume 16 Number 3 March 2014 pp. 193–206.e25 193 www.neoplasia.com Artem D. Berezovsky*, Laila M. Poisson†, Sox2 Promotes Malignancy in ‡ ‡ David Cherba , Craig P. Webb , Glioblastoma by Regulating Andrea D. Transou*, Nancy W. Lemke*, Xin Hong*, Laura A. Hasselbach*, Susan M. Irtenkauf*, Plasticity and Astrocytic Tom Mikkelsen*,§ and Ana C. deCarvalho* Differentiation1,2 *Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; †Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; ‡Program of Translational Medicine, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI; §Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI Abstract The high-mobility group–box transcription factor sex-determining region Y–box 2 (Sox2) is essential for the maintenance of stem cells from early development to adult tissues. Sox2 can reprogram differentiated cells into pluripotent cells in concert with other factors and is overexpressed in various cancers. In glioblastoma (GBM), Sox2 is a marker of cancer stemlike cells (CSCs) in neurosphere cultures and is associated with the proneural molecular subtype. Here, we report that Sox2 expression pattern in GBM tumors and patient-derived mouse xenografts is not restricted to a small percentage of cells and is coexpressed with various lineage markers, suggesting that its expression extends beyond CSCs to encompass more differentiated neoplastic cells across molecular subtypes. Employing a CSC derived from a patient with GBM and isogenic differentiated cell model, we show that Sox2 knockdown in the differentiated state abolished dedifferentiation and acquisition of CSC phenotype. Furthermore, Sox2 deficiency specifically impaired the astrocytic component of a biphasic gliosarcoma xenograft model while allowing the formation of tumors with sarcomatous phenotype.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,846,077 B2 A61K 95.146
    USOO8846077B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,846,077 B2 DeWitt (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 30, 2014 (54) HIGH THROUGHPUT FABRICATION OF 6,291,013 B1 9, 2001 Gibson et al. NANOPARTICLES 6,485,690 B1 1 1/2002 Pfostet al. 6,551,619 B1 4/2003 Penkler et al. 2002fOO99051 A1 7/2002 Fidler et al. (71) Applicant: Bind Biosciences, Inc., Cambridge, MA 2003/0211164 A1 1 1/2003 Wright et al. (US) 2004/0247680 A1* 12/2004 Farokhzad et al. ........... 424/486 2004/0248778 Al 12/2004 Gloger et al. (72) Inventor: David M. Dewitt, Allston, MA (US) 2005/0142206 A1 6/2005 Brown et al. 2005/0276859 A1* 12/2005 Rickey et al. ................. 424/489 (73) Assignee: Bind Biosciences, Inc., Cambridge, MA 2007/00988O2 A1 5, 2007 Farret al. (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this & 8 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 OC Farokhzad, JM Karp, R Langer Nanoparticle aptamer U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. bioconjugates for cancer targeting.' Expert Opinion in Drug Deliv ery, vol. 3(3), 2006, pp. 311-324.* (21) Appl. No.: 13/716,275 E.M.M.D. Valle. “Cyclodextrins and Their Uses: A Review.” Process Biochemistry, vol.39, 2004, pp. 1033-1046.* (22) Filed: Dec. 17, 2012 Avgoustakis, K. “Pegylated Poly(Lactide) and Poly(Lactide-Co Glycolide) Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties and Possible (65) Prior Publication Data Applications in Drug Delivery Current Drug Delivery, 2004, pp. US 2013/O123351A1 May 16, 2013 321-333to vol. 1. No. 4. s Ressing, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Safety of Methotrexate in Routine Clinical Care: Discontinuation
    207 EXTENDED REPORT Long term safety of methotrexate in routine clinical care: discontinuation is unusual and rarely the result of laboratory abnormalities Y Yazici, T Sokka, H Kautiainen, C Swearingen, I Kulman, T Pincus ............................................................................................................................... Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:207–211. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.023408 Objective: To analyse patients with rheumatoid arthritis, treated with methotrexate in a weekly academic rheumatology clinic over 13 years, for continuation of courses and reasons for discontinuation. Methods: All 248 patients with an analysable longitudinal course who took methotrexate in standard care between 1990 and 2003 were studied. Continuation of courses was analysed using life tables. All abnormal and severely abnormal values for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) .40 U/l, .80 U/l, albumin ,35 g/l, ,30 g/l, white blood cell (WBC) count ,4.06109/l, ,3.06109/l, and platelet count ,1506109/l, ,1006109/l, were identified. Responses of the clinician and subsequent laboratory values were reviewed. See end of article for Results: Over 1007 person-years, the probability of continuing methotrexate over five years was 79% authors’ affiliations ....................... (95% confidence interval, 72% to 84%). Severe laboratory abnormalities occurred in 2.9 per 100 person- years, specifically 0.9 for AST .80 U/l, 1.1 for albumin ,30 g/l, 0.7 for WBC ,3.06109/l, and 0.3 for Correspondence to: platelets ,1006109/l. No severe laboratory abnormality progressed to further severity or clinical Dr Yusuf Yazici, 515 East 72nd Street #29E, New disease. Permanent discontinuations of methotrexate occurred in 46 patients (19%), 26 (10% of all York, NY 10021, USA; patients) for adverse effects, 15 (32.6%) for inefficacy; only two discontinuations resulted from laboratory [email protected] abnormalities, both of WBC, possibly from other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetraspanins Associated with Oxldl and Igg Mediated Phagocytosis in Human U937 Macrophages Pardis Pakshir Ryerson University
    Ryerson University Digital Commons @ Ryerson Theses and dissertations 1-1-2013 Tetraspanins Associated With oxLDL and IgG Mediated Phagocytosis In Human U937 Macrophages Pardis Pakshir Ryerson University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ryerson.ca/dissertations Part of the Medical Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Pakshir, Pardis, "Tetraspanins Associated With oxLDL and IgG Mediated Phagocytosis In Human U937 Macrophages" (2013). Theses and dissertations. Paper 2050. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Ryerson. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ryerson. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TETRASPANINS ASSOCIATED WITH oxLDL AND IgG MEDIATED PHAGOCYTOSIS IN HUMAN U937 MACROPHAGES by Pardis Pakshir B.Sc., University of Waterloo, 2011 A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Program of Molecular Science Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Pardis Pakshir, 2013 AUTHORS’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. ii ABSTRACT TETRASPANINS ASSOCIATED WITH oxLDL AND IgG MEDIATED PHAGOCYTOSIS IN HUMAN U937 MACROPHAGES Pardis Pakshir, Master of Science, Molecular Science, Ryerson University, 2013 One of the crucial key targets in treatment of diseases are cell surface proteins, such as receptor complexes, and their associated signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]