Ustulata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Analysed by C and G Banding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ustulata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Analysed by C and G Banding Heredity 56 (1986) 161—165 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 21 June 1985 H ete roch romati n variants in Baetica ustulata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) analysed by C and G banding J. Navas-Castillo, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, J. Cabrero and Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain J. P. M. Camacho Extensive variation in heterochromatin exists in natural populations of Baetica ustulata, as deduced following the application of C and 6 banding techniques. These techniques enable us to describe nine C-heterochromatin variants for the M chromosomes (M3, M4 and M5) and to distinguish between the response of several classes of heterochromatin to G-banding. Different populations of this species are very different for the C-heterochromatin variants, which is due to their geographical isolation, the low mobility of these insects and the extensive intrapopulational variation which, as we propose, may be increased by meiotic recombination. Three classes of response to C banding show the different C-heterochromatic regions analysed. Firstly, a contrary response is shown by the nucleolar associated heterochromatin interstitially located in the long arm of L2 chromosome so that it C-bands darkly but G-bands lightly. Secondly, a parallel response to both techniques is demonstrated by centromeric heterochromatin. Thirdly, the large heterochromatic blocks in the M chromosomes show dark C-banding but "grey" G-banding, being those in M3 and M4 surrounded by small dark G-bands. INTRODUCTION of Warramaba Virgo(Webb et a!., 1978) and Melanoplussanguinipes(Zhan et a!., 1984). IntraspecificC-heterochromatin variation has Baetica ustulata isthe only species of this been observed in many species of plants and monospecific genus, and is endemic in the Iberian animals. One of the possible significations of the Peninsula, living only in Sierra Nevada (Granada) polymorphisms for C-heterochromatin content at altitudes ranging from 2500 m to 3450 m rests on the influence that C-positive blocks have (Pascual, 1978). This species has been studied on both chiasma formation in the nearby regions cytologically by Fernández-Piqueras et a!. (1984) to their location in the chromosome and mean cell in populations from the North side of Sierra chiasma frequency (Hewitt, 1979; John, 1983; Nevada, and they found an extensive polymorph- Navas Castillo et a!., 1985). However, the charac- ism for C-heterochromatin. In this paper we terisation of the different C-band variants is a analyse one population sample from the South side necessary previous condition before generalising of Sierra Nevada using C and G banding tech- the results obtained from particular cases. In this niques. sense, the heterochromatin of the standard comple- ment seems to be heterogeneous (see Rocchi, 1982), and the supernumerary heterochromatin MATERIALSAND METHODS may show different responses to the same C- banding technique (Camacho et aL, 1984). In order Elevenmales and seven females were caught in to characterise the nature of heterochromatin Alto del Chorrillo (2700 m altitude), which is situ- variants it is advisable to use several different tech- ated at the South side of Sierra Nevada (Granada, niques which may discriminate between them. Spain). Testes were fixed in ethanol-acetic acid Although C-banding is easily obtained in orthop- (3: 1). Females were injected with 005 per cent teran chromosomes, G-banding has only been well colchicine in insect saline for 6 hours prior to defined for the B chromosomes of Chortoicetes fixation of the ovarioles. C-banding was conducted terminfera (Webb, 1976; Webb and Nehaus, 1979) as described by Camacho et aL (1984) and G- and, with less definition, in standard chromosomes banding with trypsin followed by a brief treatment 162 J. NAVAS-CASTILLO, J. CABRERO AND J. P. M. CAMACHO with 2 x SSC at 60°C. This G-banding technique Some are similar and others are different from was recently been put forward for mammal those observed by Fernández-Piqueras et a!. (bc chromosomes by our colleagues M. Burgos, R. cit.,) in North side populations. The C-hetero- Jiménez and Dr R. DIaz de la Guardia (submitted chromatin variants for the M autosomes found in for publication). our population are shown in fig. 3. They were two for the M3, three for the M4 and four for the M5. The most frequent type of M3 (A-variant) carries RESULTS two C-blocks, one subterminal and the other distal. This latter block is slightly larger than the subter- Thechromosome complement of the ephippigerid minal one. The other M3 variant (B) carries only Baetica ustulata consists of 2n =24+XO/XX the subterminal C-band. chromosomes(fig. 1) and the 12 autosomal pairs The three types of M4 chromosomes carry two may be divided into three size groups: Two long C-blocks, one of which is subterminal the other (L1 and L2), three medium (M3 —M5)and seven distal. The A-variant possesses two C-blocks of short pairs (S6—S12). Both pairs of L autosomes similar size separated by an euchromatic short are metacentric while the remainder, including the region, the B-variant is similar but with larger X, are telocentric. The size of the X chromosome C-blocks, and the C-variant has a small subter- is intermediate between that of the L and M auto- minal C-block plus a larger distal one. somes. The C-banding pattern consists of small The M5 is the most variable chromosome in paracentromeric C-bands in all chromosomes, and our population caused by the presence of supernu- there is an interstitial C-band in the long arm of merary chromosome segments. We found four L2 chrosome which coincides with the only active different types: One lacking any distal C-hetero- NOR in this species (fig. 2). In addition there are chromatin (A), one carrying a small distal C-band prominent C-blocks located interstitially, subter- (B), the third carrying a large distal C-block (C), minally and distally in the M chromosomes (fig. 1). and the fourth (D) carrying a distal C-block double Fernández-Piqueras eta!. (1984) have reported the size of that found in C. extensive variation for the C-blocks in the M The G-banding technique gives a characteristic chromosomes. In our popftlation sample, collected G-banding pattern in the L and M autosomes (fig. from the South side of Sierra Nevada, there is also 4). The two L1 chromosomes show a similar pattern variation for the C-blocks in these chromosomes. of dark bands and light interbands which coincide L2 X 9 fr Is.. M3 S6 S7 *1 • 0 'I'•1 *4 L2 44' $9 5io 5ii 12 :8 - 2 Figures land 2 C-banded karyotype of a M4—A/M4— B heterozygous male (1), and silver stained pachytene cell showing the location (arrowhead) of the nucleolus organiser region (NOR) in Baeticaustulata. NU:nucleolus. HETEROCHROMATIN VARIANTS IN BAETICA USTULATA 163 mentis less condensed a series of small bands and interbands are apparent (see fig. 7). In an individual carrying two different M4 chromosome variants (A and C) we observed incurved pairing configuration in pachytene cells (fig. 10), which indicates that homologous pairing is specific for the dark G-bands, but inspecific for the light interbands. a Meiotic segregation of the distal C-block in M5 0 heteromorphic bivalents is always equational due nSA to the formation of one chiasma in the region between the C-blocks and the centromere (figs. 11 and 12). In the M3 bivalents we have occasionally observed chiasma formation in the euchromatic region between the C-blocks (see fig. 6), which a might be a source of new chromosome variants a when they occur in heteromorphic M3 (and per- (n haps M4) bivalents. r.c DISCUSSION The present report analyses a population sample from the South side of Sierra Nevada, while Fernández-Piqueraset al. (1984) studied individuals from the North side of Sierra Nevada. Figure 3C-heterochromatin variants for M3, M4 and M5 Both localities are sited very far and completely chromosomes. isolated one another, given the low mobility of these apterous insects. In the North side popula- in their position and sequence. The same is tions, Fernandez-Piqueras et a!. (1984) found one apparent in the L2 chromosomes but, here, one of type of M3 and four types of M4 and M5 chromo- the light interbands in the long arm coincides in somes on the basis of C-banding pattern. In the position with the dark C-band associated to the South side population, we have found two types NOR (see also fig. 5). The C-heterochromatin of M3, three types of M4 and four types of M5 blocks in the M chromosomes show differential chromosomes, some of which are similar but others response to G-banding, so that some C-regions are different to those in the North side populations: G-band darkly and others only lightly (figs. 6-10). The two types of M3 in the South side are different The M3 shows in the region of the C-heterochro- to the only type in the North side (compare our matic blocks, a G-banding pattern consisting of fig. 3 with fig. la,b in Fernández-Piqueras et al. two unequal "grey" interbands surrounded by bc cit.,). The M4 type A in South side population three small dark bands, one being proximal, one and that type A in North side populations seems sited between the two interbands (which presum- to be the same but, however, the two other M4 ably coincides with the euchromatic region variants in the former are different to the three between both C-blocks) and one distally located other ones in the latter. Two out of the four M5 (figs. 6 and 7).
Recommended publications
  • Phylum ARTHROPODA ORTHOPTERA
    Phylum ARTHROPODA ORTHOPTERA Baetica ustulata (Rambur, 1838). Ephippiger ustulata Rambur, 1838. "F. Ent.". Andal. II (3), Dec., p. 52. Baetica Bolivar, 1903. "Bull. Mus.". Paris, 9, p.227. Phylum ARTHROPODA. Subphylum UNIRAMIA. Clase: INSECTA. Orden: ORTHOPTERA. Suborden: ENSIFERA. Superfamilia: TETTIGONIOIDEA. Familia: TETTIGONIIDAE. Subfamilia: EPHIPPIGERINAE. Nombre vulgar: desconocido por nosotros. Género monoespecífico. STATUS Convenio de Berna II. UICN-V. Directiva hábitats. España: rara (5). DISTRIBUCION Distribución mediterránea montana: rango Penibético, Sierra Nevada (Granada) (2-4,7- 9). UTM (2) 30SVG60, 30SVF69. (7) 30SVG60, 30SVG40, 30SVF69, 30SVF79. BIOLOGIA Especie carnívora y detritívora, muy especializada al hábitat alpino (3). Presenta actividad diurna. No parece mostrar una alta especialización en la dieta, recurriendo a un alimento alternativo. Especialización reproductiva (5). MAPA 80 HABITAT Forma alpina: especie que vive en cumbres altas, en suelo desnudo o bajo piedras y rocas, en áreas desoladas, desprovistas de vegetación, a veces cerca de la línea de nieves perpetuas (1); en pastizales xéricos; desde los 2.500 a 3.400 m. de altitud. Es una especie geófila especialmente con las condiciones meteorológicas adversas (5). POBLACION El área sobre la que el taxón se distribuye es muy pequeño. El tamaño poblacional es mediano. Las poblaciones están restringidas a zonas montañosas y se sospechan estables (6). La distribución está bien conocida y su presencia es predecible en todo su rango. Los factores que actúan en su distribución y población son desconocidos o cuestionables (5). AMENAZAS Dada la distribución tan restringida y la fragilidad del biotopo montano, todos aquellos factores que puedan alterar mínimamente su hábitat constituyen graves amenazas. Actúa especialmente de esta forma la presión turística.
    [Show full text]
  • Baetica Ustulata
    Baetica ustulata Nombre de la especie Baetica ustulata Nomenclatura Ephippiger ustulatus Rambur, 1838, Faune Entom. de l’Andalusie, 2 (3): p. 52. Baetica Bolivar, 1903. Bull. Mus.". París, 9, p. 227. Phylum Arthropoda Clase Hexapoda Orden Orthoptera Suborden Ensifera Superfamilia Tettigonioidea Familia Tettigonidae Subfamilia Ephippigerinae Sinonimias Ninguna. Taxones infraespecíficos Ninguno Identificación GANGWERE, VIEDMA y LLORENTE (1985)) Longitud: macho:18-22 mm; hembra: 22-26 mm. Dorsalmente de color negro brillante, anaranjado en el vientre, extremidades y borde lateral del pronoto. Pronoto sin quillas media y laterales; tegmina ocultos; patas cortas. Cercos del macho cilíndricos sobrepasando el epiprocto. Ovipositor curvado, largo; dos veces la longitud del pronoto. Referencias bibliográficas BOLíVAR (1907): descripción del género Baetica y clave para separarlo de otros géneros de Tetigónidos (en latín). MORALES AGACINO (1944): descripción, figuras y claves para separarlo de los otros géneros de Ephippigerinae. HARZ (1969): descripción y claves. PASCUAL (1977): descripci ón detallada y claves PASCUAL (1978): claves. GANGWERE, VIEDMA y LLORENTE (1985): breve descripción y fotografía en color de adultos (macho y hembra). PEINADO y MATEOS (1986): breve descripción del adulto. Biología Hábitat: Según Gangwere et al. (1985) y Rosas et al . (1992) la especie se localiza en lugares abiertos o casi desprovistos de cubierta vegetal pudiendose encontrar bajo piedras en suelos con escasa vegetación almohadillada y espinosa, en biotopos psicroxerófilos y entre los piornales de Genista baetica en biotopos xerófilos. En ocasiones se encuentran en el interior de los piornos pertenecientes a la ass. Genisto-Juniperetum nanae Quezel. La selección de un refugio parece estar relacionado con la disponibilidad de piornos.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, 19 April 2013
    Strasbourg, 25 October 2013 T-PVS (2013) 17 [tpvs17e_2013.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Group of Experts on the Conservation of Invertebrates Tirana, Albania 23-24 September 2013 ---ooOoo--- REPORT Document prepared by the Directorate of Democratic Governance This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2013) 17 - 2 - CONTENTS 1. Meeting report ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Appendix 1: Agenda .......................................................................................................................... 6 3. Appendix 2: List of participants ........................................................................................................ 9 4. Appendix 3: Compilation of National Reports .................................................................................. 10 5. Appendix 4: Draft Recommendation on threats by neurotoxic insecticides to pollinators ................ 75 * * * The Standing Committee is invited to: 1. Take note of the report of the meeting; 2. Thank the Albanian government for the efficient preparation of the meeting and the excellent hospitality; 3. Continue with Bern Convention engagement with invertebrate conservation issues by further encouraging and monitoring national implementation of European Strategy for the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Orden ORTHOPTERA Manual
    Revista IDE@ - SEA, nº 46 (30-06-2015): 1–13. ISSN 2386-7183 1 Ibero Diversidad Entomológica @ccesible www.sea-entomologia.org/IDE@ Clase: Insecta Orden ORTHOPTERA Manual CLASE INSECTA Orden Orthoptera Antonio Aguirre-Segura1 & Pablo Barranco Vega2 1 Grupo de Investigación “Ecología de Zonas Áridas”. 2 Dpto. Biología y Geología Edificio CITE- II B. Universidad de Almería. Cañada de S. Urbano s/n. 04120- Almería 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected] 1. Breve definición del grupo y principales caracteres diagnósticos Son artrópodos de la Clase Insecta, por lo general tamaño desde mediano a grande, aunque algunos pueden ser muy pequeños. La cabeza forma generalmente un ángulo recto con el eje del cuerpo (boca dirigida hacia abajo), con ojos compuestos grandes, con ocelos y antenas más o menos largas. Aparato bucal de tipo masticador. Tercer par de patas normalmente especializadas para el salto. Dos pares de alas (ocasionalmente reducidas en mayor o menor grado según las especies, llegando incluso a estar ausentes en algunas): el primer par suele ser de consistencia coriácea (tegminas), el segundo (alas pro- piamente dichas) se encuentra plegado bajo el anterior y es de consistencia más membranosa. 1.1. Morfología (los términos en negrita están indicados en las figuras que se adjuntan) El orden se divide en dos subórdenes (Caelifera y Ensifera) con algunas diferencias morfológicas que se irán indicando: Cabeza: Ortognata, más o menos esférica (aunque pueden existir significativas excepciones), con antenas más o menos largas: filiformes, formadas por muchos artejos y más largas que el cuerpo (en la mayoría de los Ensifera) o normalmente más cortas, normalmente no superando la mitad del cuer- po(Caelifera), formadas por pocos artejos claramente visibles, normalmente filiformes, aunque pueden variar en su estructura en los Caelifera (de sección oval, aplanada, triangular (ensiformes) o con el extre- mo ensanchado (mazudas).
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Bradyporinae)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 50 (30/06/2012): 171. REVISIÓN PRELIMINAR DE LOS GÉNEROS DE EPHIPPIGERINI BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1878 (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE: BRADYPORINAE) Joan Barat C/ Sant Marià 75 àtic 2.ª 08840 Viladecans (Barcelona, España) – [email protected] Resumen: Se revisa la taxonomía de los doce táxones del nivel género que actualmente se aceptan como válidos para Ephippige- rini, puesto que es muy manifiesto que, tal como están definidos, algunos de ellos (Bolivarius Harz, 1969; Ephippiger Berthold, 1827; Ephippigerida Bolívar en Buysson, 1903; Steropleurus Bolívar, 1878; y Uromenus Bolívar, 1878) no constituyen verdaderas unidades taxonómicas. Se describen nueve géneros nuevos: Afrosteropleurus n. gen., Coracinotus n. gen., Corsteropleurus n. gen., Lluciapomaresius n. gen., Parasteropleurus n. gen. y Sorapagus n. gen., compuestos por especies segregadas de Stero- pleurus; y Albarracinia n. gen., Lucasia n. gen. y Sabaterpia n. gen., compuestos por especies segregadas de Ephippigerida. Se establece Bolivarius como sinónimo de Uromenus, que una vez redefinido pasa de las 30 especies que le atribuye Nadig (1994) a 43. Sin embargo, renunciamos a intervenir en la división de Ephippiger y Uromenus por el insuficiente conocimiento que tenemos de algunas de sus especies. Se incluye una clave y, para cada género, su historia taxonómica, una descripción, incluyendo carac- teres bioacústicos, una diagnosis, un mapa de distribución, y un catálogo de especies con indicación del nombre original y los
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae
    The Evolution and Function of the Spermatophylax in Bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Karim Vahed, B.Sc Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, January 1994. ".. and soon from the male's convulsive loins there is seen to issue, in painful labour, something monstrous and un­ heard of, as though the creature were expelling its entrails in a lump". J.ll.Fabre (1899). To my Father. Abstract In certain species of cricket and bushcricket (Orthoptera; Ensifera), the male transfers an elaborate spermatophore to the female at mating. This consists of a sperm-containing ampulla and an often substantial, sperm-free, gelatinous mass known as the spermatophylax. After mating, the female eats the spermatophylax before consuming the ampulla. The spermatophylax is particularly well developed in the bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae) and can contribute to a loss of as much as 40% of male body weigh at mating in some species. Recently, there has been considerable debate over the selective pressures responsible for the evolution and maintenance of the spermatophylax and other forms of nuptial feeding in insects. Two different, though not mutually exclusive, functions have been suggested for the spermatophylax: 1) nutrients from the spermatophylax may function to increase the weight and\or number of eggs laid by the female, i.e. may function as paternal investment; 2) the spermatophylax may function to prevent the female from eating the ampulla before complete ejaculate transfer, i.e. may be regarded as a form of mating effort. In this study, a comparative approach combined with laboratory manipulations were used in an attempt to elucidate the selective pressures responsible for the origin, evolutionary enlargement and maintenance (= function) of the spermatophylax in bushcrickets.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Grasshoppers, Crickets and Bush-Crickets
    European Red List of Grasshoppers, Crickets and Bush-crickets Axel Hochkirch, Ana Nieto, Mariana García Criado, Marta Cálix, Yoan Braud, Filippo M. Buzzetti, Dragan Chobanov, Baudewijn Odé, Juan José Presa Asensio, Luc Willemse, Thomas Zuna-Kratky et al. European Red List of Grasshoppers, Crickets and Bush-crickets Axel Hochkirch, Ana Nieto, Mariana García Criado, Marta Cálix, Yoan Braud, Filippo M. Buzzetti, Dragan Chobanov, Baudewijn Odé, Juan José Presa Asensio, Luc Willemse, Thomas Zuna-Kratky, Pablo Barranco Vega, Mark Bushell, María Eulalia Clemente, José R. Correas, François Dusoulier, Sónia Ferreira, Paolo Fontana, María Dolores García, Klaus-Gerhard Heller, Ionuț Ș. Iorgu, Slobodan Ivković, Vassiliki Kati, Roy Kleukers, Anton Krištín, Michèle Lemonnier-Darcemont, Paulo Lemos, Bruno Massa, Christian Monnerat, Kelly P. Papapavlou, Florent Prunier, Taras Pushkar, Christian Roesti, Florin Rutschmann, Deniz Şirin, Josip Skejo, Gergely Szövényi, Elli Tzirkalli, Varvara Vedenina, Joan Barat Domenech, Francisco Barros, Pedro J. Cordero Tapia, Bernard Defaut, Thomas Fartmann, Stanislav Gomboc, Jorge Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Jaroslav Holuša, Inge Illich, Sami Karjalainen, Petr Kočárek, Olga Korsunovskaya, Anna Liana, Heriberto López, Didier Morin, Josep María Olmo-Vidal, Gellért Puskás, Vladimir Savitsky, Thomas Stalling and Josef Tumbrinck IUCN Global Species Programme IUCN European Regional Office Published by the European Commission This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The information and views set out in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of IUCN and of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)
    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(1): 1–12, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/1/1 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Cytogenetic variability among Bradyporinae species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) 1 1 1 ELżBIETA WARCHAŁOWSKA-ŚLIWA , BEATA GRZYWACZ , ANNA MARYAŃSKA-NADACHOWSKA , 2 3 4 TATYANA V. KARAMYSHEVA , DRAGAN P. CHOBANOV and KLAUS-GERHARD HELLER 1 Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Tsar Osvoboditel 1, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Grillenstieg 18, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Orthoptera, Ephippigerini, Bradyporini, karyotype evolution, chromosome fusion, B chromosomes, FISH, rDNA Abstract. Chromosomes of six European species (one with two subspecies) of Orthoptera belonging to the tribes Ephippigerini and Bradyporini were analyzed using C-banding, Ag-NOR, DAPI (AT-rich)/CMA3 (GC-rich) staining and fluorescence in situ hybridi- zation (FISH) using the 18S rDNA and (TTAGG)n telomeric probes with the aim to better understand chromosomal organization and evolutionary relationships between genera and subgenera within and across both tribes. The evolution of karyotypes was studied in terms of changes in chromosome number (2n) and morphology (FN, the fundamental number – i.e. the number of chromosome arms including the X chromosome). The ancestral 2n = 31 was reduced to 2n = 29 (FN = 31) and 27 (FN = 31) by one or two Robert- sonian fusions in the Ephippigerini.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Under Laboratory Conditions
    Wageningen Academic Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 2021; 7(1): 89-97 Publishers Cannibalism, oviposition and egg development in the edible long-horned grasshopper, Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) under laboratory conditions J.P. Egonyu*, M.M. Miti, C.M. Tanga, A. Leonard and S. Subramanian International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; [email protected] Received: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 30 May 2020 © 2020 Wageningen Academic Publishers OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH ARTICLE Abstract Reliance on seasonal wild harvests of the edible long-horned grasshopper Ruspolia differens (Serville) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) needs to be broken through developing efficient mass rearing protocols. This study aimed at boosting productivity of laboratory colonies of R. differens through understanding ways of minimising cannibalism, selecting suitable oviposition substrates and enhancing egg development and hatchability. Firstly, we investigated the extent of cannibalism in a colony of R. differens relative to total mortality, sex, diurnality, growth stage, body parts eaten and visual barriers (presence/absence of cardboard egg trays). R. differens cadavers recovered from cages with/without the egg trays were scored for cause of death (cannibalism/other), time of death (night/day), sex, growth stage and body part devoured. Secondly, cotton wool and leaf sheaths of Pennisetum sp., maize and Panicum sp. were evaluated for oviposition preference by R. differens. Eggs oviposited in each substrate were incubated to determine developmental duration and hatchability. Thirdly, we tested effect of moistening R. differens eggs on incubation period and hatchability in intact and opened leaf sheaths against unmoistened eggs in intact sheaths as a control.
    [Show full text]
  • Currículum Vítae
    Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Currículum vítae Número de hojas que contiene: 61 Nombre: Juan Pedro Martínez Camacho Fecha: 3 de junio de 2016 Firma: El arriba firmante declara que son ciertos los datos que figuran en este currículo, asumiendo, en caso contrario, las responsabilidades que pudieran derivarse de las inexactitudes que consten en el mismo. Sexenios de investigación: 6 Quinquenios docentes: 6 Tramos autonómicos: 5 1 Datos personales Apellidos: Martínez Camacho Nombre: Juan Pedro Situación profesional actual Organismo: Universidad de Granada Facultad, Escuela o Instituto: Facultad de Ciencias Depto./Secc./Unidad estr.: Departamento de Genética Área de conocimiento: Genética Dirección postal: Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada Teléfono (indicar prefijo, número y extensión): 958 248925 Fax: 958 244073 Correo electrónico: [email protected] Especialización (Códigos UNESCO): 240999 Categoria profesional: Catedrático de Universidad Fecha de inicio: 02/07/2009 Situación administrativa Plantilla Contratado Interino Becario Otras situaciones especificar: Dedicación A tiempo completo A tiempo parcial Títulos académicos Titulación Superior Centro, Organismo Fecha Licenciado en Ciencias Biológicas Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada 1/07/75 Doctorado Centro, Organismo Fecha Doctor en Biología, espec. Genética Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada 30/11/80 Puestos docentes desempeñados Categoría Departamento, Organismo Fechas Profesor Ayudante Dept. de Genética, Univ. de Granada 1975-83 Catedrático Interino Dept. de Genética, Univ. de Granada 1983-84 Profesor Titular de Universidad Dept. de Genética, Univ. De Granada 1984-2009 Catedrático de Universidad Dept. de Genética, Univ. De Granada 2009-actualidad Becas, ayudas y premios recibidos - Beca-salario durante los estudios de Licenciatura.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Global-Change Observatory Monitoring Methodologies
    INTRODUCTION Sierra Nevada Global-Change Observatory Monitoring Methodologies January 2014 Sierra Nevada Global-Change Observatory 1 SIERRA NEVADA GLOBAL-CHANGE OBSERVATORY MONITORING METHODOLOGIES Publisher: Department of the Environment and Urban Planing. Junta de Andalucía. Minister for the Environment: María Jesús Serrano Jiménez. Deputy Minister for the Environment: Ricardo Domínguez García-Baquero. General Director for Management of the Environment: Francisco Javier Madrid Rojo. General Director for Protected Areas and Citizen Participation: Esperanza Perea Acosta. General Director for Open Spaces and Citizen Participation: Rocío Espinosa de la Torre. Director of the Sierra Nevada National Park and Natural Park: Francisco Javier Sánchez Gutiérrez. Sierra Nevada National Park and Natural Park conservator: Ignacio Luis Henares Civantos. Scientific Coordinator of the Sierra Nevada Global-Change Observatory: Regino Jesús Zamora Rodríguez. Project Manager of Sierra Nevada Global-Change Monitoring Programme: Blanca Ramos Losada. Publication Coordinators: Rut Aspizua Cantón, José Miguel Barea Azcón, Francisco Javier Bonet García, Antonio Jesús Pérez Luque and Regino Jesús Zamora Rodríguez. Graphic Design and Layout: Creados Visual, S.L. How to cite this document: Aspizua, R., Barea-Azcón, J.M., Bonet, F.J., Pérez-Luque, A.J. and Zamora, R.J. (coords.). 2014. Sierra Nevada Global-Change Observatory. Monitoring methodologies. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía. 112 pp. Sections should be cited as follows: Muñoz, J.M. 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, 22 May 2002
    Strasbourg, 24 September 2009 T-PVS/Inf (2009) 8 rev [Inf08erev_2009.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 29th meeting Bern, 23-26 November 2009 __________ IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON EUROPEAN INVERTEBRATES, WITH REFERENCE TO THE VULNERABILITY OF BERN CONVENTION SPECIES FINAL VERSION Report prepared by Dr Robert Wilson, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter UK This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2009) 8 rev - 2 – TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Invertebrate responses to recent climate change .................................................................... 4 2.1 Phenological change ................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Demographic responses .............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Habitat associations .................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Evolutionary responses ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]