DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint IFS‑ISAR‑ACE Recommendations on Resuming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint IFS‑ISAR‑ACE Recommendations on Resuming [Downloaded free from http://www.jhrsonline.org on Tuesday, July 21, 2020, IP: 59.97.86.18] ISAR Pages Joint IFS‑ISAR‑ACE Recommendations on Resuming/Opening up Assisted Reproductive Technology Services Sudha Prasad1, Prakash Trivedi2, Neena Malhotra3, Madhuri Patil4, Dakshinamoorthy Swaminathan5, Sanjay Shukla6, Kedar Ganla7 1 President, Indian Fertility COVID‑19 – A Global challenge on a scale not previously seen. Reproductive Society; Director, Matritava – care is essential for the well‑being of society and therefore the treatment needs to Advanced IVF and Training Center, Delhi, 2President, be completely re‑thought and individualised . Infectivity and mortality rates are Indian Society for Assisted higher than previous pandemics and the disease is present in almost every country. Abstract Reproduction; Director, Propagation and containment have varied widely by location and, at present, the Dr. Trivedi’s Total Health timeline to complete resolution is unknown. With successful mitigation strategies Care Hospital & Aakar in some areas and emergence of additional data, the societies have sanctioned IVF‑ICSI Centre, Mumbai gradual and judicious resumption of delivery of full reproductive care. When India; Gynae Laparoscopist, Urogynecologist & ART we resume, monitor local conditions, including prevalence of disease, status Consultant Fortis Hospital, of government or state regulations, and availability of resource. It is important Mulund, Mumbai, 3Secretary, to implement proactive risk assessment within their practices prior to restarting Indian Fertility Society; services. One needs to develop clear and modified plans to ensure the ability to Professor, Consultant, ART provide care while maximizing the safety of their patients and staff. One should Centre, Department of All also remain informed and stay current regarding new medical findings. These India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, recommendations provide resources for restarting ART practice again. 4Editor in Chief, Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences; Clinical Director, Dr Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Clinic, Bangalore, 5President, Academy of Clinical Embryologists, INDIA [ACE]; Scientific Director; Santhathi Centre For Reproductive Medicine, Mangalore, 6Secretary, Academy of Clinical Embryologists; Lab Director, Baheti Hospital & Centre for Reproductive Healthcare, Jaipur, 7Secretary, Indian Society for Assisted Reproduction, Fertility Consultant, Ankur Fertility Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology, COVID‑19, precautions, Clinic, Mumbai, India resumption Address for correspondence: Dr. Madhuri Patil, Dr. Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Clinic, This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to E‑mail: [email protected] remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Received: 06‑04‑2020 For reprints contact: [email protected] Accepted: 06‑04‑2020 Published: 09‑07‑2020 Access this article online How to cite this article: Prasad S, Trivedi P, Malhotra N, Patil M, Quick Response Code: Swaminathan D, Shukla S, et al. Joint IFS-ISAR-ACE recommendations on Website: resuming/opening up assisted reproductive technology services. J Hum www.jhrsonline.org Reprod Sci 2020;13:82-8. JHRS_109_20 is a Joint IFS‑ISAR‑ACE Recommendations on Resuming/ DOI: Opening up Assisted Reproductive Technology Services. Being a joint 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_109_20 statement from IFS and ISAR I as an editor of JHRS give permission for it to be simultaneously published in FSR along with JHRS. 82 © 2020 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow [Downloaded free from http://www.jhrsonline.org on Tuesday, July 21, 2020, IP: 59.97.86.18] Prasad, et al.: ART practice post‑COVID‑19 Introduction c. Sufficient facilities for separate cryostorage of he novel coronavirus pandemic globally has created gametes and embryos from cycles undertaken during Tan unprecedented situation with major challenges this period that will continue as we understand the pattern of d. Have clear policy on the number of cycles/patients this disease. Besides effects on the health systems, the clinic can handle and not violate the government’s the illness has made a major impact on the economic policy that demand adequate interval between attending patients and have means to implement the and social framework of our societies. In keeping with [1] the lockdown since March 23, 2020, imposed by the same e. Unit that has adequate supply of personal‑protective Government of India, wherein only emergency services equipment (PPE) for staff, drugs and media and were permitted, all assisted conception units across consumables for committed patients the country stopped work. However, as the situation f. Fair and scientific approach on making their policies unfolds, the government at the center relaxes the on education and training of staff lockdown permitting nonessential services in a gradual g. Willing to triage patients and undertake only patients manner; it is time to consider reassuming infertility tested negative for COVID‑19 services in keeping with the guidelines set by the h. Have a close liaison with another clinic so that they Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. This document can transfer patients in times of unintended critical is drafted to provide centers across the country a situation so that the clinic can undertake trouble guidance as to how should they restart the services. shooting to reopen at the earliest The recommendations, however, are to be practiced in i. Have a written code of conduct for patients and keeping with the prevailing regulations set up by the staff that explains need of physical distancing, and health services of their state. These are based on the maintaining etiquettes that mitigate the disease in the understanding of the COVID‑19 disease as of today clinic and shall change with evolving scientific, political, and j. All patients to have the Arogya Setu app economic situations. downloaded on their mobile phones before start of Fundamental Principle the treatment. The fundamental principle guiding all units is to Diagnostic services implement all the measures to protect their patients and These can be resumed as part of the initial phase of [2] staff on priority and minimize the chance of spread of re‑opening. Only start with couples that are triage COVID‑19. Units providing infertility services should negative. be willing and prepared to modify their services in a. Semen analysis terms of available framework and human resource i. Ensure husband is negative for COVID with to meet the demanding situation. This shall involve reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction triage of patients while commencing and continuing (RT‑PCR) (preferable) the treatment cycle, besides regular triage of the staff. ii. This may be done taking precautions with Further, all units should have their standard operating adequate PPE, as preliminary data suggests procedure (SOP) in place and a code of conduct, for the presence of virus in semen, with 15.8% both the patients and staff. The key areas that need men confirming positive for severe acute guidance include: respiratory syndrome (SARS)‑COV‑2 in semen collected from men with positive RT‑PCR on Units to reassume nasopharyngeal swabs.[3] All units can restart (stand‑alone unit, chain of fertility b. Hormone assays units, corporate set up units, or ones in institutions) their c. Saline sonography services provided they take into consideration: d. HSG – Mostly done at radiology suites. However, a. Willing to start services in a phased manner in institutions to be done with all precautions and beginning with diagnostic services, controlled ovarian adequate PPE hyperstimulation, and timed intercourse intra‑uterine e. Office hysteroscopy. insemination (TI/IUI), and subsequently with in vitro i. Office diagnostic hysteroscopy may be done fertilization (IVF) over 2–3 weeks with local para or intracervical block (2).[4] Total b. Sufficient clinical staff, in‑house embryologists, and intravenous anesthesia may be another choice nurses that can work in shifts and a back‑up team ii. For hysteroscopic resection of intracavitary lesion in case any need quarantining if suspected or tested regional anesthesia to be preferred, safeguarding COVID positive the risks to anesthetist from GA. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences ¦ Volume 13 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ April-June 2020 83 [Downloaded free from http://www.jhrsonline.org on Tuesday, July 21, 2020, IP: 59.97.86.18] Prasad, et al.: ART practice post‑COVID‑19 f. Laparoscopy g. The additional costs involved in testing shall be Elective laparoscopic procedure should be borne by the patient based on the principle of prioritization based h. That information on the effects of COVID‑19 infection on the urgency of fertility treatment. However, on fertility treatment and early pregnancy are limited. emergency laparoscopies for ectopic pregnancy However, there is no evidence that infection increases and adnexal torsion should be performed in view risk of fetal malformations or miscarriage at present[1,2,9,11] of the underlying urgency. During laparoscopy i. In case the staff at the hospital tests positive for aerosolization can take place during anesthesia and COVID‑19, during treatment cycle, patient will be pneumoperitoneum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: an Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics
    ROBERTSON - REVISED FINAL PRINT VERSION.DOC 12/02/04 6:55 PM Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: An Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics * JOHN A. ROBERTSON The development of assisted reproductive and genetic screening technologies has produced intense ethical, legal, and policy conflicts in many countries. This Article surveys the German and U.S. experience with abortion, assisted reproduction, embryonic stem cell research, therapeutic cloning, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This exercise in comparative bioethics shows that although there is a wide degree of overlap in many areas, important policy differences, especially over embryo and fetal status, directly affect infertile and at-risk couples. This Article analyzes those differences and their likely impact on future reception of biotechnological innovation in each country. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................190 I. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT.............................................193 II. GERMAN PROTECTION OF FETUSES AND EMBRYOS ...............195 III. ABORTION .............................................................................196 IV. ASSISTED REPRODUCTION .....................................................202 A. Embryo Protection and IVF Success Rates................204 B. Reducing Multiple Gestations ....................................207 C. Gamete Donors and Surrogates .................................209 V. EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH......................................211
    [Show full text]
  • KEMRI Bioethics Review 4
    JulyOctober- - September December 20152015 KEMRI Bioethics Review Volume V -Issue 4 2015 Google Image Reproductive Health Ethics October- December 2015 Editor in Chief: Contents Prof Elizabeth Bukusi Editors 1. Letter from the Chief Editor pg 3 Dr Serah Gitome Ms Everlyne Ombati Production and Design 2. A Word from the Director KEMRI pg 4 Timothy Kipkosgei 3 Background and considerations for ethical For questions and use of assisted reproduction technologies in queries write Kenyan social environment pg 5 to: The KEMRI Bioethics Review 4. Reproductive Health and HIV-Ethical Dilemmas In Discordant Couples Interven- KEMRI-SERU P.O. Box 54840-00200 tions pg 9 Nairobi, Kenya Email: [email protected] 5. The Childless couple: At what cost should childlessness be remedied? pg 12 6. Multipurpose Prevention Technologies As Seen From a Bowl of Salad Combo pg 15 7. Case challenge pg 17 KEMRI Bioethics Review Newsletter is an iniative of the ADILI Task Force with full support of KEMRI. The newsletter is published every 3 months and hosted on the KEMRI website. We publish articles written by KEMRI researchers and other contributors from all over Kenya. The scope of articles ranges from ethical issues on: BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, HEALTHCARE, TECHNOLOGY, LAW , RELIGION AND POLICY. The chief editor encourages submisssion of articles as a way of creating awareness and discussions on bioethics please write to [email protected] 2 Volume V Issue 4 October- December 2015 Letter from the Chief Editor Prof Elizabeth Anne Bukusi, MBChB, M.Med (ObGyn), MPH, PhD , PGD(Research Ethics). MBE (Bioethics) , CIP (Certified IRB Professional). Chief Research Officer and Deputy Director (Research and Train- ing) KEMRI Welcome to this issue of KEMRI Bioethics Review focusing on Reproductive Health Ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Insemination, Egg Donation, and Adoption
    EH 1:3.1994 ARTIFICIAL INSEMINIATION, EGG DoNATION AND ADoPTION Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff This paper wa.s approred by the CJLS on /Harch 16, 199-1, by a vote (!f'trventy one inf(rnJr and one abstention (21-0-1). K1ting infiwor: Rabbis K1tssel Abel""~ Bm Lion Bergmwz, Stanley Bmmniclr, Hlliot N. Dorff; Samuel Fmint, Jl}TOn S. Cellrt; Arnold M. Goodman, Susan Crossman, Jan Caryl Kaufman, Judah Kogen, vernon H. Kurtz, Aaron T.. :lfaclder, Herbert i\Iandl, Uonel F:. Moses, Paul Plotkin, Mayer Rabinou,itz, Joel F:. Rembaum, Chaim A. Rogoff; Joel Roth, Gerald Skolnih and Cordon Tucher. AlJstaining: Rabbi Reuren Kimelman. 1he Committee 011 .lnuish L(Lw and Standards qf the Rabbinical As:wmbly provides f};ztidance in matters (!f halakhnh for the Conservative movement. The individual rabbi, however, is the (Wtlwri~yfor the interpretation nnd application r~f all mntters of' halaklwh. An infertile Jewish couple has asked the following questions: Which, if any, of the new developments in reproductive technology does Jewish law require us to try? \'\Thich rnay we try? Which, if any, does Jewish law forbid us to try? If we are not able to conceive, how does Jewish law view adoption? TIH:s<: questions can best he trcat<:d hy dividing those issues that apply to the couple from those that apply to potential donors of sperm or eggs, and by separately delineating the sta­ tus in Jewish law of the various techniques currently available. For the Couple May an infertile Jewish couple use any or all of the following methods to procreate: (1) arti­ ficial insemination
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Aspects of Assisted Reproduction
    FACTS VIEWS VIS OBGYN, 2016, 8 (1): 33-48 Review Religious aspects of assisted reproduction H.N. SALLAM1,2, N.H. SALLAM2 Department of 1Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Alexandria Fertility and 2IVF Center, Alexandria, Egypt. Correspondence at: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Human response to new developments regarding birth, death, marriage and divorce is largely shaped by religious beliefs. When assisted reproduction was introduced into medical practice in the last quarter of the twentieth century, it was fiercely attacked by some religious groups and highly welcomed by others. Today, assisted reproduction is accepted in nearly all its forms by Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism, although most Orthodox Jews refuse third party involvement. On the contrary assisted reproduction is totally unacceptable to Roman Catholicism, while Protestants, Anglicans, Coptic Christians and Sunni Muslims accept most of its forms, which do not involve gamete or embryo donation. Orthodox Christians are less strict than Catholic Christians but still refuse third party involvement. Interestingly, in contrast to Sunni Islam, Shi’a Islam accepts gamete donation and has made provisions to institutionalize it. Chinese culture is strongly influenced by Confucianism, which accepts all forms of assisted reproduction that do not involve third parties. Other communities follow the law of the land, which is usually dictated by the religious group(s) that make(s) the majority of that specific community. The debate will certainly continue as long as new developments arise in the ever-evolving field of assisted reproduction. Key words: Assisted reproduction, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, ICSI, IVF, Judaism, religion, religious aspects. Introduction birth, death, marriage or divorce.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Men with Treated and Untreated Varicocele: Systematic Male Fertility Review and Meta‑Analysis
    Asian Journal of Andrology (2016) 18, 254–258 © 2016 AJA, SIMM & SJTU. All rights reserved 1008-682X www.asiaandro.com; www.ajandrology.com Open Access INVITED REVIEW Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in men with treated and untreated varicocele: systematic Male Fertility review and meta‑analysis Sandro C Esteves1, Matheus Roque2, Ashok Agarwal3 Varicocele affects approximately 35%–40% of men presenting for an infertility evaluation. There is fair evidence indicating that surgical repair of clinical varicocele improves semen parameters, decreases seminal oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation, and increases the chances of natural conception. However, it is unclear whether performing varicocelectomy in men with clinical varicocele prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART) improve treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of varicocelectomy on ART pregnancy outcomes in nonazoospermic infertile men with clinical varicocele. An electronic search was performed to collect all evidence that fitted our eligibility criteria using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until April 2015. Four retrospective studies were included, all of which involved intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and accounted for 870 cycles (438 subjected to ICSI with prior varicocelectomy, and 432 without prior varicocelectomy). There was a significant increase in the clinical pregnancy rates (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.19–2.12, I 2 = 25%) and live birth rates (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.55–3.06, I 2 = 0%) in the varicocelectomy group compared to the group subjected to ICSI without previous varicocelectomy. Our results indicate that performing varicocelectomy in patients with clinical varicocele prior to ICSI is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Placental Abnormalities and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension in Prematurity Associated with Various Assisted Reproduc
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Influence of Placental Abnormalities and Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension in Prematurity Associated with Various Assisted Reproductive Technology Techniques Judy E. Stern 1,* , Chia-ling Liu 2 , Sunah S. Hwang 3, Dmitry Dukhovny 4 , Leslie V. Farland 5, Hafsatou Diop 6, Charles C. Coddington 7 and Howard Cabral 8 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA 2 Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02108, USA; [email protected] 3 Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] 4 Division of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; [email protected] 5 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA; [email protected] 6 Division of Maternal and Child Health Research and Analysis, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA 02108, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA; [email protected] 8 Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA; Citation: Stern, J.E.; Liu, C.-l.; [email protected] Hwang, S.S.; Dukhovny, D.; Farland, * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-603-252-0696 L.V.; Diop, H.; Coddington, C.C.; Cabral, H. Influence of Placental Abstract: Objective. Assisted reproductive technology (ART)-treated women exhibit increased risk Abnormalities and Pregnancy- of premature delivery compared to fertile women.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in Reproductive Biology
    Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in Reproductive Biology Faheem Ahmed Khan, Nuruliarizki Shinta Pandupuspitasari, Huang ChunJie, Hafz Ishfaq Ahmad, Kai Wang, Muhammad Jamil Ahmad and ShuJun Zhang* Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Te People’s Republic of China. *Correspondence: [email protected] htps://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.026.093 Abstract into genes that interact with environment to develop Genome editing is unravelling its benefts in wide a specifc phenotype. Although extensive studies areas of scientifc development and understanding. have been carried out but still the understanding Te advances of genome editing from ZFNs and of genes and its function is far from understanding TALLENs to CRISPRs defnes its wide applicabil- because genes are diferentially expressed. Te pre- ity. Reproduction is the fundamental process by sent advances in genome editing technologies takes which all organisms maintain their generations. a leap towards endogenous genome modifcation, CRISPR/Cas9, a new versatile genome editing which gives rise to several opportunities to deal tool has been recently tamed to correct several with diseases and undesired phenotypes (Khan et disease causing genetic mutations, spreading its al., 2016). arms to improve reproductive health. It not only Te continuous update to knowledge reservoir edits harmful genetic mutations but is also applied owes to molecular studies unfolding several impor- to control the spread of parasitic diseases such as tant aspects of genes and their interactions with malaria by introducing selfsh genetic elements, the environment enabling scientists to do forward propagated through generations and population via and reverse genetics model cells and organisms reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law Daniel B
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 30 | Number 1 Article 5 2002 Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law Daniel B. Sinclair Tel Aviv College of Management Academic Studies, Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel B. Sinclair, Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law, 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 71 (2002). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol30/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assisted Reproduction in Jewish Law Cover Page Footnote Professor of Jewish and Comparative Biomedical Law, Tel Aviv College of Management Academic Studies, Law School. LL.B. (Hons.); LL.M.; LL.D. Ordained Rabbi and formerly Rabbi of the Edinburgh Hebrew Congregation and Dean of Jews College (London). This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol30/iss1/5 ASSISTED REPRODUCTION IN JEWISH LAW Daniel B. Sinclair* I. ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION USING THE HUSBAND'S SPERM ("AIH"): JEWISH AND CATHOLIC POSITIONS This Section is devoted to a survey of Jewish law, or halakhah, in relation to AIH, and a comparative discussion of Jewish and Cath- olic approaches to reproductive technology in general. AIH ac- counts for a small proportion of artificial insemination cases, and is recommended in situations where the husband suffers from ana- tomical defects of his sexual organ or from severe psychological impotence.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Fertilization Christian and Islamic Perspectives on the Ethical
    In vitro Fertilization Christian and Islamic Perspectives on the Ethical Dilemma of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Stephanie Sariles Department of Biology; College of Arts and Sciences Abilene Christian University After defining IVF procedures and the associated biomedical ethics with each, I will compare and contrast Christian and Islamic perspectives on IVF. Christianity in general does not accept IVF, because it is an unnatural method of reproduction that can affect Christian traditions such as parenthood and marriage. Despite this view, Protestants, in particular, have opened up to IVF as a method for treating infertility. Islam fully accepts IVF provided the married couple follows Islamic law. Sunni Muslims do not accept gamete donation, but Shi’ite Muslims are more flexible with gamete donation and surrogacy. The development of reproductive Christianity share several similarities in technology has become an answered prayer beliefs and doctrines, however, these for several infertile couples around the religions do not share the same perspectives world. Reproductive technologies, such as in regards to the ethical dilemma of in-vitro artificial insemination and in-vitro fertilization. Islam focuses on the interaction fertilization, have become common options between marriage laws and IVF, while offered by physicians for patients, who Christianity concentrates on the interaction desire to hold their own child in their arms between IVF and a natural order of life even though medically the probability for designated by a sole creator. This them to naturally conceive are low. comparative analysis between two religious Although this scientific development has views of IVF demonstrates that religion is a become a solution for infertility and often factor that contributes to the ethical dilemma viewed as a miracle for some, it has been a of reproductive technologies and influences controversial decision that has caused rifts the societal perspective on IVF.
    [Show full text]
  • GIFT Stands for Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer
    Gamete Intra-Fallopian Transfer GIFT stands for Gamete intrafallopian transfer It is a tool of assisted reproductive technology (refers to treatments used to assist people in achieving a pregnancy.) against infertility. Eggs are removed from a woman's ovaries, and placed in one of the Fallopian tubes, along with the man's sperm. • The first example of GIFT involved primates during the 1970s • The technique was first attempted by STEPTOE and EDWARD • The technology was unsuccessful until 1984. • Then an effective GIFT method was invented by Ricardo Asch at the University of Texas Health Sciences Centre and the procedure resulted in the first human pregnancy. • The GIFT technique was created in hopes of generating an artificial insemination process that mimicked the physiological sequences of normal conception. • The technique was further advanced at the Center for Reproductive Health at the University of California, Irvine, when Asch and his associate Jose Balmaceda employed a newly developed catheter(a tubular medical device used for insertion in canals, passageways, body cavities usually to permit injection or withdrawal of fluids or to keep a passage open) into the GIFT procedure that eliminated the need for general anesthesia in the later stages of the procedure. Oocytes retrieved via laparoscopy (Laparoscopy is keyhole surgery used to examine or operate on the interior of the abdominal or pelvic cavities.) Oocytes and sperms are placed in same catheter (catheter is a thin tube made from medical grade materials serving a broad range of functions. Catheters are medical devices that can be inserted in the body to treat diseases or perform a surgical procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Subsidizing Ivf Decrease Adoption Rates and Should It Matter? I
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2010 Trading-Off Reproductive Technology and Adoption: Does Subsidizing Ivf Decrease Adoption Rates and Should It Matter? I. Glenn Cohen Daniel L. Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cohen, I. Glenn and Chen, Daniel L., "Trading-Off Reproductive Technology and Adoption: Does Subsidizing Ivf Decrease Adoption Rates and Should It Matter?" (2010). Minnesota Law Review. 438. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/438 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Article Trading-Off Reproductive Technology and Adoption: Does Subsidizing IVF Decrease Adoption Rates and Should It Matter? I. Glenn Cohen† and Daniel L. Chen†† Introduction ............................................................................. 486 I. Background on Reproductive Technologies and Adoption ............................................................................. 489 A. Infertility and IVF in the United States .................... 489 B. Adoption in the United States .................................... 493 II. The Policy Debate Over State-Level Insurance Mandates Covering IVF: Do States Have an Obligation to Improve Access to Reproductive Technologies Even If It
    [Show full text]
  • CP.MP.55 Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Clinical Policy: Assisted Reproductive Technology Reference Number: CP.MP.55 Coding Implications Last Review Date: 12/20 Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Diagnostic infertility services to determine the cause of infertility and treatment is covered only when specific coverage is provided under the terms of a member’s/enrollee’s benefit plan. All coverage is subject to the terms and conditions of the plan. The following discussion is applicable only to members/enrollees whose Plan covers infertility services. Infertility is defined as the condition of an individual who is unable to conceive or produce conception during a period of 1 year if the female is age 35 or younger or during a period of 6 months if the female is over the age of 35. For purposes of meeting the criteria for infertility in this section, if a person conceives but is unable to carry that pregnancy to live birth, the period of time she attempted to conceive prior to achieving that pregnancy shall be included in the calculation of the 1 year or 6 month period, as applicable. Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) encompass a variety of clinical treatments and laboratory procedures, which include the handling of human oocytes, sperm or embryos, with the intent of establishing pregnancy. The following services are considered medically necessary when performed solely for the treatment of infertility in an individual in whom fertility would naturally be expected and when meeting the accompanying ART criteria in the Policy/Criteria section. Females: 1.
    [Show full text]