291075_ART-NationalSummary_Cover.indd 1 Division ofReproductive Health National Center for Chronic DiseasePrevention andHealth Promotion
2016 Report National Summary T R A echnology eproductive eproductive ssisted ssisted 4/20/2018 10:45:32 AM Updates to this report will be posted on the CDC website at the following address: https://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/ For additional information, send an e-mail to [email protected] Or write to CDC, ATTN: ART Surveillance and Research Team 4770 Buford Highway, N.E.; Mail Stop F-74; Atlanta, GA 30341-3717 291075_ART-NationalSummary_Title-Divider.indd 1
2016 Report National Summary T R A echnology eproductive eproductive ssisted ssisted October 2018 4/20/2018 12:59:15 PM Acknowledgments
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the This publication was developed and produced by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, and National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine thank Health Promotion of the Centers for Disease Control RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association and and Prevention in consultation with the American Path2Parenthood for their commitment to assisted Society for Reproductive Medicine and the reproductive technology (ART) surveillance. Their Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. assistance in making this report informative and helpful to people considering an ART procedure is greatly appreciated.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion ...... Dana Shelton, MPH, Acting Director
Division of Reproductive Health ...... RADM Wanda D. Barfield, MD, MPH, Director Kelly Morris, MPH, CHES
Maternal and Infant Health Branch ...... William M. Callaghan, MD, MPH, Chief Sheree L. Boulet, DrPH, MPH Jeani Chang, PhD, MPH Sara Crawford, PhD Dmitry M. Kissin, MD, MPH Aniket D. Kulkarni, MBBS, MPH Mithi Sunderam, PhD Yujia Zhang, PhD
American Society for Reproductive Medicine...... Christos Coutifaris, MD, PhD, President
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology...... David Seifer, MD, President Kelley Jefferson
Suggested Citation: Centers for Disease Control The data included in this report and publication and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive support were provided by Westat under Contract Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive No. GS-23F-8144H for the National Center for Chronic Technology. 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for National Summary Report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2018 Health and Human Services. Table of Contents
National Report ...... 1 Introduction to the 2016 National Report ...... 3 2016 National Summary ...... 5 Section 1: Overview ...... 7 Section 2: ART Cycles Using Fresh Embryos from Fresh Nondonor Eggs ...... 13 Section 3: ART Cycles Using Frozen Embryos from Nondonor Eggs ...... 43 Section 4: ART Cycles Using Donor Eggs ...... 46 Section 5: ART Trends, 2007–2016 ...... 50 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms ...... 61
2016National Report
291075_ART-NationalSummary_Title-Divider.indd 2 4/20/2018 12:59:21 PM . INTRODUCTION TO THE 2016 NATIONAL REPORT
Data provided by United States clinics that rates for the 463 clinics included in the 2016 use assisted reproductive technology (ART) to Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic treat infertility are a rich source of information Success Rates Report (hereafter called the 2016 about the factors that contribute to a successful Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report), the 934 ART treatment—the delivery of a healthy live- cycles using fresh embryos from a patient’s own born infant. Pooling the data from all reporting previously frozen eggs are not included in the clinics provides a national picture that could majority of this national report. The majority of not be obtained by examining data from an the report uses the remaining 196,803 cycles individual clinic. including 3,329 fresh embryo cycles using previously frozen donor eggs. A patient’s chances of having a pregnancy and a live birth when using ART are influenced by Of the 263,577 ART cycles performed in 2016, many factors, some of which are patient-related 65,840 cycles (25%) were started with the intent and outside a clinic’s control (for example, the of cryopreserving (freezing) and storing all patient’s age or the cause of infertility). Because resulting eggs or embryos for potential future the national data include information on many of use. However, because this cycle type (a banking these factors, this can give potential ART patients cycle) cannot result in immediate pregnancy, the an idea of the average chances of success. 65,840 banking cycles started in 2016 are not Average chances, however, do not necessarily included in the majority of this national report. apply to a particular individual or couple. People The 263,577 total ART cycles performed in considering ART should consult their physician 2016 excludes 2 cycles started in which a new to discuss all the factors that apply in their treatment procedure was being evaluated. The particular case. 2 new procedure cycles are not included in the The data for this national report come from majority of this national report because they do the 463 fertility clinics in operation in 2016 that not contribute to the calculation of any success provided and verified data on the outcomes of all rates for the 463 clinics included in the 2016 ART cycles started in their clinics. Of the 263,577 Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. ART cycles performed in 2016 at these reporting The 2016 National Summary table on page 5 clinics, 197,737 cycles (75%) were started with combines data from all 263,577 cycles reported the intent to transfer at least one embryo. These by the 463 clinics. For an explanation of how 197,737 cycles resulted in 65,969 live births to read this table, see pages 11–21 of the 2016 (deliveries of one or more living infants) and Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report available at 76,897 infants. https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html. Of the 197,737 ART cycles started in 2016 with the This national report consists of graphs and charts intent to transfer at least one embryo, 934 cycles that use 2016 data to answer specific questions were reported with the intent to thaw a patient’s related to ART success rates. These figures previously frozen egg, fertilize the egg, and then are organized according to the type of ART transfer the resulting embryo. However, because procedure used. Some ART procedures use a this cycle type (a cycle using fresh embryos from woman’s own eggs (nondonor cycles), and others a patient’s own previously frozen eggs) does use donated eggs or embryos (donor cycles). not contribute to the calculation of any success
3 As a result, although sperm used to create an • Section 2, ART cycles using fresh embryos embryo also may be either from a female patient’s from fresh nondonor eggs (Figures 7 through partner, a male patient, or a sperm donor, ART 36): This section presents information on the cycles in this report are classified according to ART cycles performed in 2016 with the intent to the source of the egg. transfer at least one fresh embryo from a fresh nondonor egg or at least one fresh nondonor In some procedures, the embryos that develop egg. Because patients in this section are using after fertilization are transferred back to the their own eggs, rather than eggs from a female female patient or gestational carrier without donor, all cycles performed in this section having been frozen (fresh embryo transfer); in will be for female patients only. Figures in this others, embryos that previously have been frozen section are based on 86,237 cycles resulting in (cryopreserved) for transfer at a later date are 52,686 transfers. thawed and transferred to the female patient or gestational carrier (frozen embryo transfer). For • Section 3, ART cycles using frozen embryos both fresh and frozen embryo cycles, the eggs from nondonor eggs (Figures 37 through 39): that are fertilized to create the embryos also may This section presents information on the ART be fresh (never frozen) or frozen and thawed prior cycles performed in 2016 with the intent to to fertilization. transfer at least one frozen embryo from a nondonor egg. Because patients in this section The national report has five sections: are using their own eggs, rather than eggs from • Section 1, Overview (Figures 1 through 6): This a female donor, all cycles performed in the section presents overall information about the section will be for female patients only. Figures different types of ART cycles performed in in this section are based on 86,266 cycles 2016. Figure 2 is the only figure in the report resulting in 79,910 transfers. which contains information about all 263,579 • Section 4, ART cycles using donor eggs ART cycles started in 2016. All other figures (Figures 40 through 43): This section presents in Section 1 exclude 2 cycles in which a new information on the ART cycles performed in treatment procedure was being evaluated 2016 with the intent to transfer at least one (research cycles). Figures 4 and 5 also exclude embryo from a donor egg or at least one donor 65,840 egg or embryo banking cycles and egg. This includes cycles using fresh embryos 934 cycles using fresh embryos from frozen from fresh donor eggs, fresh embryos from nondonor eggs. Figure 6 excludes all cycles frozen donor eggs, frozen embryos from donor except those using fresh embryos from frozen eggs, and donated embryos (embryos from (donor or nondonor) eggs. As a result, Figures another patient’s ART treatment). Figures 40, 1 and 3 are based on 263,577 non-research 42, and 43 in this section are based on 24,300 cycles; Figure 6 is based on 4,263 fresh embryo cycles resulting in 21,318 transfers. Figure 41 from frozen egg cycles; and Figures 4 and 5 are excludes male patients, and is based on 23,251 based on 196,803 cycles using fresh embryos cycles and 20,371 transfers. from fresh nondonor eggs, frozen embryos from nondonor eggs, or donor eggs performed • Section 5 (Figures 44 through 54) presents in 2016 with the intent to transfer at least one trends in the number of ART procedures and egg or embryo. measures of success over the past 10 years, from 2007 through 2016. Beginning with cycles performed in 2016, data from 4,263 cycles using fresh embryos from frozen eggs are included in Figures 44 and 47.
4 2016 NATIONAL SUMMARY Technical terms are defined in the Glossary of Terms (Appendix A, pages 63–66). For more information on how to interpret the statistics in this table, see pages 11–21 in the 2016 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. 2016 ART CYCLE PROFILE Type of ART and Procedural Factors a Patient Diagnosis a,b IVF >99% With ICSI 66% Tubal factor 12% Uterine factor 6% Multiple Factors: Unstimulated 1% PGD/PGS 22% Ovulatory dysfunction 16% Male factor 32% Female factors only 13% Used gestational carrier 3% Diminished ovarian reserve 31% Other factor 21% Female & male factors 17% Endometriosis 8% Unknown factor 13% d c,d Total number of cycles : 263,577 2016 ART SUCCESS RATES (includes 934 cycle[s] using fresh embryos from frozen nondonor eggs) Age of Patient Type of Cycle <35 35–37 38–40 41–42 >42 Fresh Embryos from Fresh Nondonor Eggs Number of cycles 36,625 18,278 16,109 8,264 6,961 Percentage of cancellations before retrieval (%) 6.2 10.9 16.3 20.0 22.6 Number of transfers 24,878 11,672 9,149 4,093 2,894 Average number of embryos transferred 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.4 Percentage of elective single embryo transfers (eSET) (%) 42.7 25.2 9.0 3.7 2.8 Outcomes per Cycle Percentage of cycles resulting in pregnancies (%) 35.9 29.5 21.7 12.6 6.3 Percentage of cycles resulting in live births (%) 31.0 24.0 15.5 8.0 3.2 Percentage of cycles resulting in singleton live births (%) 24.9 19.0 12.7 7.0 2.9 Percentage of cycles resulting in twin live births (%) 5.9 4.8 2.8 1.0 0.4 e Percentage of cycles resulting in term, normal weight and singleton live births (%) 21.0 15.8 10.4 5.6 2.2 Outcomes per Transfer Percentage of embryos transferred resulting in implantation (%) 41.8 32.6 22.0 11.7 5.9 Percentage of transfers resulting in pregnancies (%) 52.9 46.2 38.3 25.5 15.2 Percentage of transfers resulting in live births (%) 45.7 37.6 27.4 16.1 7.8 Percentage of transfers resulting in singleton live births (%) 36.7 29.8 22.3 14.1 6.9 Percentage of transfers resulting in twin live births (%) 8.7 7.6 4.8 2.0 0.9 e Percentage of transfers resulting in term, normal weight and singleton live births (%) 30.9 24.7 18.3 11.3 5.3 Frozen Embryos from Nondonor Eggs Number of cycles 39,894 21,400 15,529 5,749 3,694 Number of transfers 37,461 19,913 14,200 5,142 3,194 Estimated average number of transfers per retrieval 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Average number of embryos transferred 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 Percentage of embryos transferred resulting in implantation (%) 49.6 46.7 42.6 35.5 23.9 Percentage of transfers resulting in pregnancies (%) 59.3 57.1 54.1 48.6 38.1 Percentage of transfers resulting in live births (%) 49.4 46.5 42.7 37.9 27.7 Percentage of transfers resulting in singleton live births (%) 41.5 40.3 37.9 34.5 25.2 Percentage of transfers resulting in twin live births (%) 7.8 6.1 4.7 3.3 2.5 e Percentage of transfers resulting in term, normal weight and singleton live births (%) 35.4 34.2 32.0 28.9 20.9 Number of Egg or Embryo Banking Cycles 20,949 14,556 14,913 7,661 7,761 Number of fertility preservation cycles 4,273 3,941 3,286 1,258 1,174 Fresh Frozen Frozen Donated f Donor Eggs Eggs Eggs Embryos Embryos Number of cycles 5,644 3,329 13,458 1,869 Number of transfers 4,446 2,723 12,391 1,758 Average number of embryos transferred 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.7 Percentage of embryos transferred resulting in implantation (%) 53.9 41.9 46.1 38.4 Percentage of transfers resulting in pregnancies (%) 65.0 54.7 55.8 53.1 Percentage of transfers resulting in live births (%) 54.6 44.9 44.8 42.7 Percentage of transfers resulting in singleton live births (%) 41.7 36.2 37.7 33.9 Percentage of transfers resulting in twin live births (%) 12.7 8.4 6.9 8.5 e Percentage of transfers resulting in term, normal weight and singleton live births (%) 32.5 28.1 29.4 26.8
CURRENT SERVICES & PROFILE Number of reporting clinics: 463 Percentage of clinics that allow cycles involving: Clinic profile: Donor eggs 88% Single women 99% SART member 82% Donor embryos 63% Gestational carriers 88% Verified lab accreditation Embryo cryopreservation >99% Yes 92% Egg cryopreservation 97% No 5% Pending 2%
a Excludes cycles evaluating new procedures and banking cycles; unstimulated percentage includes fresh egg cycles only.
b Total patient diagnosis percentages may be greater than 100% because more than one diagnosis can be reported for each ART cycle.
c Multiple-infant births (for example, twins) with at least one live infant are counted as one live birth.
d Total cycle number and success rates exclude 2 cycle(s) evaluating new procedures. Success rates exclude cycles using fresh embryos from frozen nondonor eggs.
e In this report, births are defined as term if at least 37 full weeks gestation and normal birth weight if at least 2,500 grams (approximately 5 pounds, 8 ounces).
f All ages are reported together because previous data show that patient age does not materially affect success with donor eggs. 5
SECTION 1: OVERVIEW Overview Where are ART clinics located?
ART clinics are located throughout the United since CDC began collecting this information in States. Figure 1 shows the locations of the 463 1995 (see Section 5, pages 50–60). Because in reporting clinics. Individual clinic tables with some cases more than one infant is born during success rates and clinic profiles are published in a live-birth delivery (for example, twins), the total the 2016 Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report, number of infants born is greater than the number arranged in alphabetical order by state, city, of live-birth deliveries. CDC estimates that and clinic name. The number of clinics, cycles ART accounts for slightly less than 2% of total performed, live-birth deliveries, and infants born US births. as a result of ART all have increased steadily
Figure 1 Locations of ART Clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico, 2016
Number of Clinics 1–2 3–5 6–10
11–25
26–50
Number of ART clinics in the United States in 2016 ...... 502 Number of ART clinics that submitted data in 2016 ...... 463 Total number of ART cycles started in 2016 at clinics reporting data ...... 263,577* Number of live-birth deliveries resulting from all ART cycles started in 2016 ...... 65,996 Number of infants born as a result of all ART cycles started in 2016 ...... 76,930 * Total includes 65,840 cycles with the intent to freeze all eggs or embryos and 934 cycles with the intent to fertilize previously frozen nondonor eggs and transfer resulting embryos. Figure 1 does not include 2 cycles evaluating a new treatment procedure. See the introduction on pages 3–4 for more details about the types of ART cycles performed and included in other figures.
7 Overview from previously frozen andthaweddonoreggs, fresh donoreggs,1%usedfresh embryos More specifically, 2%usedfresh embryosfrom ART cyclesintendedtouseeggsfrom adonor. from nondonoreggs.Incomparison,9%of nondonor eggs,and33%usedfrozen embryos embryos from previously frozen andthawed fresh nondonoreggs,lessthan1%usedfresh More specifically, 33%usedfresh embryosfrom to useapatient’s owneggs,ornondonoreggs. States in2016were performedwiththeintent The majority(66%)ofART cyclesintheUnited What typesofARTcycleswereperformed? re r i * Total doesnot equal100%duetorounding. Types ofART Cycles—UnitedStates,* 2016 Figure 2 e re re r e re e e r e re r e r e e r r re e e e r 8 included inotherfigures. about thetypesofART cyclesperformedand the introduction onpages3–4formore details the evaluationofanewtreatment procedure. See future use.There were twocyclesthatinvolved bank) allresulting eggsorembryosforpotential in 2016withtheintenttofreeze andstore (or another patient.There were 25%ofcyclesstarted after ART treatment donatestheseembryosto embryos inwhichapatientwithunused from donoreggs,andabout1%useddonated 5% usedfrozen embryospreviously created e ew re e r e re r e re e re e r r re e r r re r e e e How old were ART patients? Overview
As shown in Figure 3, which presents ART cycles aged 43–44, and 6% among patients older than performed in the United States in 2016 according age 44. to the age of the patient who had the procedure, the largest group of patients using ART services The average age of patients using ART services were patients younger than age 35. These in 2016 was 36. Cycles with the intent to use patients represented approximately 38% of all fresh embryos from previously frozen nondonor ART cycles performed in 2016. There were 22% eggs and cycles with the intent to bank all eggs of ART cycles performed among patients aged or embryos are included in the data for this figure. 35–37, 19% among patients aged 38–40, 10% See the introduction on pages 3–4 for more among patients aged 41–42, 6% among patients information about these cycle types.
Figure 3 ART Use by Age Group—United States,* 2016