Replication and Repair* Ann Rose§ Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Replication and Repair* Ann Rose§ Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Replication and repair* Ann Rose§ Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2. The FA repair pathway ............................................................................................................. 4 3. Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) ...................................................................................................... 4 4. G-rich secondary structures ....................................................................................................... 5 5. Checkpoint activation ............................................................................................................... 6 6. Double strand breaks (DSBs) ..................................................................................................... 6 7. Single strand breaks (SSBs) ....................................................................................................... 6 8. Cohesins ................................................................................................................................7 9. Telomere maintenance .............................................................................................................. 7 10. Meiosis ................................................................................................................................7 11. Mutators ...............................................................................................................................8 12. Chromatin modifications ......................................................................................................... 8 13. Looking Forward ................................................................................................................... 9 14. Summary ..............................................................................................................................9 15. Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. 9 16. References ............................................................................................................................9 1. Introduction Integrity of genetic information is essential to both individual health and reproductive capacity. The Caenorhabditis elegans model system provides an opportunity not only to investigate the components of the various repair pathways and the pathway interactions, but also to study the role of repair in different developmental stages. A number of different DNA repair pathways respond to damage dependent upon the nature of the damage, type of cell, stage of development, and genomic location, for example, at the telomeres (Astin et al., 2008; Clejan et al., 2006; reviewed in Lans and Vermeulen, 2011). It is well known, for example, that the response to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the proliferating premeiotic germline differs from that during meiosis or embryonic cleavage, and from somatic cell replication (Vermezovic et al., 2012; Couteau and Zetka, 2011; Lans et al., 2010; McLellan et al., 2009; Pontier and Tijsterman, 2009; Lee et al., 2007; Holway et al., 2006; Weidhaas et al., 2006). For example, differences between somatic and germ line cell response to DNA damage were examined and * Edited by Thomas Blumenthal, Last revised: February 14, 2013. Published December 4, 2014. This chapter should be cited as: Rose A. Replication and repair (December 4, 2014), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, doi/10.1895/ wormbook.1.54.2, http://www.wormbook.org. Copyright: © 2014 Ann Rose. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. §To whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] 1 Replication and repair molecular mechanisms for somatic cell resistance to DNA damage-induced cell death described (Vermezovic et al., 2012). As an animal system, C. elegans provides a useful model to more fully understand the integration of the types of repair that occur in response to DNA damage in different cell types during growth and development (See the developmental profile of repair gene RNA in Figure 1). Figure 1. Expression profile during C. elegans development. Expression profile clustering of a set of DNA repair genes using nearest neighbor hierarchical clustering of the normalized RNA-seq data from the modEncode website is shown (www.modencode.org). The cluster analysis has been modified by hand somewhat to aggregate some groupings. The top axis is the developmental profile from fertilization to adult hermaphrodite. There is a clear change in the expression pattern at column six at the onset of gastrulation (150 min post fertilization), marked by a purple bar. A darker purple bar marks the mid-first larval stage. The green bars indicate mutant strains used. The darker green is a germline-minus strain, JK1107. Adjacent to the left are mid-larval females and young pre-gravid adult hermaphrodites. Clustering and figure prepared by Dr. Jeffrey Chu, University of British Columbia. 2 Replication and repair Since the previous version of this chapter (DNA repair), there has been an explosion of research using C. elegans to study many aspects of DNA repair and several reviews have been published (Table 1). In this chapter, the focus will be on research in the past few years beginning with the use of C. elegans in the study of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) repair pathway (reviewed in Youds et al., 2009; see also Jones and Rose, 2012). The FA pathway (see below) is involved in identifying replication blocks that can result from either unresolved DNA secondary structures (Kruisselbrink et al., 2008; Youds et al., 2006; Cheung et al., 2002) or from interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) (reviewed in McVey, 2010; Youds et al., 2009; and more generally in Kottemann and Smogorzewska, 2013; Deans and West, 2011). Repair involves translesion synthesis (TLS) and homologous recombination (HR) repair but not nonhomologous endjoining (NHEJ) (Youds et al., 2006). A key component of the FA pathway, FCD-2/FANCD2, is involved in directing repair towards error-free HR and away from error-prone NHEJ. This important choice has been shown to be under genetic control and regulated by FANCD2, which binds to DNA lesions and recruits repair proteins. In C. elegans, genetic interaction analysis demonstrated that elimination of NHEJ by inhibition of LIG4 suppressed the repair defects of Fcd-2 mutants (Adamo et al., 2010). In both C. elegans and human cells (Adamo et al., 2010; Pace et al., 2010; reviewed in Bunting and Nussensweig, 2010), it was discovered that FANCD2 is required to prevent NHEJ, which can lead to chromosomal rearrangements that may be mutagenic and toxic to the cell. HR repair, on the other hand, is essentially error free and thus the more desirable pathway for faithful reproduction. Table 1: Reviews cited Topic Reference Fanconi anemia and ICL repair Youds et al., 2009 Jones and Rose, 2012 FA Repair in avian cells Takata et al., 2006 DOG-1/FANCJ and G4 DNA repair Maizels, 2008; Brosh, 2011 G4 DNA and human disease Wu and Brosh, 2010 Interstrand crosslink repair Kottemann and Smogorzewska, 2013; Deans and West, 2011; McVey, 2010 Chromatin modification at DSB Fischle, 2009 Double strand break repair Lemmens and Tijsterman, 2011; Pontier and Tijsterma, 2009 Phosphorylation in DSB repair Summers et al., 2011 Cohesion and DNA repair Sjögren and Strom, 2009; Watrin and Peters, 2006 C. elegans cohesins Wood et al., 2010 PARPs and synthetic lethality St-Laurent and Desnoyers, 2011; Helleday, 2011 Nucleotide excision repair Lans and Vermeulen, 2011 3 Replication and repair Table 2: Known components of the FA pathway in C. elegans Reference (also Component Gene Function www.wormbase.org) Ko et al., 2008; Petalcorin et al., BRC-2 Loads RAD-51 2007; Martin et al., 2005 FCD-2 Promotes HR repair Adamo et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2007; Collis et al., 2006 FNCI-1 Required for FCD-2 focus formation Lee, K.Y. et al., 2010 DOG-1 Unwinds G-tracts Youds et al., 2008; Youds et al., 2006; Cheung et al., 2002 FNCM-1 Required for ubiquitination of FCD-2 Lee, K.Y. et al., 2010 RFS-1 RAD-51, paralog in HR repair Yanowitz, 2008; Ward et al., 2007 SLX-4 endonuclease in HR repair Saito et al., 2009 2. The FA repair pathway The Fanconi anemia pathway is so-named because of a genetic disease in humans first described by G. Fanconi (1927, in Lobitz and Velleuer, 2006). In humans, FA is a rare recessive genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure resulting in anemia and accompanied by developmental abnormalities and cancer susceptibility as a result of subsequent genome instability (www.fanconi.org). Diagnosis involves cellular hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents and more recently whole genome sequencing (WGS) (Ameziane et al., 2012). The pathway consists of a core complex of proteins that mono-ubiquinate FANC D2 and I, which then localize to sites of DNA-damage and promote HR repair. There are currently 15 genetic subtypes that have been described (A, B, C, D1 [BRCA2], D2, E, F, G, I, J, L, M, N, O and P) (Ameziane et al., 2012; reviewed in Kottemann and Smogorzewska, 2013; Deans and West, 2011). In C. elegans as in other species, the FA
Recommended publications
  • BRIP1, BRCA1 Interacting Protein C-Terminal Helicase 1 Polyclonal Antibody
    BRIP1, BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 polyclonal antibody RCA1 interacts in vivo with BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) also called BACH1, is a member of the or Research Use Only. Not for B FDiagnostic or Therapeutic Use. RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of Purchase does not include or carry the breast cancer type 1 protein (BRCA1). Helicases of the RecQ any right to resell or transfer this DEAH family have been shown to be important for the maintenance product either as a stand-alone of genomic integrity in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Members of this product or as a component of another family are genes responsible for cancer predisposition disorders like product. Any use of this product other Bloom’s syndrome, Werner’s syndrome and Rothmund-Thomson than the permitted use without the syndrome. The BRCA1/BRIP complex is important in the normal express written authorization of Allele double-strand break repair function of BRCA1. Since mutations in Biotech is strictly prohibited BRIP1 interfere with normal double-strand break repair in a manner that is dependent on its BRCA1 binding function, BRIP1 may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. Website: www.allelebiotech.com Buffers Call: 1-800-991-RNAi/858-587-6645 (Pacific Time: 9:00AM~5:00PM) Purified rabbit polyclonal antibody supplied in PBS with 0.09% (W/V) Email: [email protected] sodium azide. This antibody is purified through a protein G column and eluted out with both high and low pH buffers and neutralized immediately after elution then followed by dialysis against PBS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Breast Cancer ^ Associated BRIP1 (FANCJ/BACH1) Germ- Line Mutation Impairs Protein Stability and Function
    Cancer Prevention and Susceptibility A Novel Breast Cancer ^ Associated BRIP1 (FANCJ/BACH1)Germ- line Mutation Impairs Protein Stability and Function Arcangela De Nicolo,1MariellaTancredi,4 Grazia Lombardi,4 Cristina Chantal Flemma,4 Serena Barbuti,4 Claudio Di Cristofano,4 Bijan Sobhian,1Generoso Bevilacqua,4 Ronny Drapkin,2,3 andMariaAdelaideCaligo4 Abstract Purpose: BRCA1-interacting protein 1 (BRIP1; FANCJ/BACH1), which encodes a DNA helicase that interacts with BRCA1, has been suggested to be a low-penetrance breast cancer predispos- ing gene.We aimed to assess whether BRIP1 mutations contribute to breast cancer susceptibility in our population and, if so, to investigate the effect of such mutation(s) on BRIP1function. Experimental Design: A series of49 breast/ovarian cancer families, devoid ofa BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation, were screened for BRIP1 mutations. Functional analyses, including coimmuno- precipitation and stability assays, were employed to further characterize a previously unreported variant. Results: Five sequence alterations were identified, of which four had been already described. Herein, we report a novel BRIP1 germ-line mutation identified in a woman with early-onset breast cancer. The mutation consists ofa 4-nucleotide deletion (c.2992-2995delAAGA) in BRIP1 exon 20 that causes a shift in the reading frame, disrupts the BRCA1-binding domain of BRIP1, and creates a premature stop codon. Functional analysis ofthe recombinant mutant protein in transfected cells showed that the truncation interferes with the stability of the protein and with its ability to interact with BRCA1. Loss ofthe wild-type BRIP1 allele with retention ofthe mutated one was observed in the patient’s breast tumor tissue. Conclusions: These results, by showing that the newly identified BRIP1 c.2992-2995delAAGA mutation is associated with instability and functional impairment of the encoded protein, provide further evidence of a breast cancer ^ related role for BRIP1.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Full Page
    CCR PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SERIES CCR Pediatric Oncology Series Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders Michael F. Walsh1, Vivian Y. Chang2, Wendy K. Kohlmann3, Hamish S. Scott4, Christopher Cunniff5, Franck Bourdeaut6, Jan J. Molenaar7, Christopher C. Porter8, John T. Sandlund9, Sharon E. Plon10, Lisa L. Wang10, and Sharon A. Savage11 Abstract DNA repair syndromes are heterogeneous disorders caused by around the world to discuss and develop cancer surveillance pathogenic variants in genes encoding proteins key in DNA guidelines for children with cancer-prone disorders. Herein, replication and/or the cellular response to DNA damage. The we focus on the more common of the rare DNA repair dis- majority of these syndromes are inherited in an autosomal- orders: ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome, Fanconi ane- recessive manner, but autosomal-dominant and X-linked reces- mia, dyskeratosis congenita, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, sive disorders also exist. The clinical features of patients with DNA Rothmund–Thomson syndrome, and Xeroderma pigmento- repair syndromes are highly varied and dependent on the under- sum. Dedicated syndrome registries and a combination of lying genetic cause. Notably, all patients have elevated risks of basic science and clinical research have led to important in- syndrome-associated cancers, and many of these cancers present sights into the underlying biology of these disorders. Given the in childhood. Although it is clear that the risk of cancer is rarity of these disorders, it is recommended that centralized increased, there are limited data defining the true incidence of centers of excellence be involved directly or through consulta- cancer and almost no evidence-based approaches to cancer tion in caring for patients with heritable DNA repair syn- surveillance in patients with DNA repair disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • HEREDITARY CANCER PANELS Part I
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Clinic Building, K6, Core Lab, E-655 2799 W. Grand Blvd. HEREDITARY CANCER PANELS Detroit, MI 48202 855.916.4DNA (4362) Part I- REQUISITION Required Patient Information Ordering Physician Information Name: _________________________________________________ Gender: M F Name: _____________________________________________________________ MRN: _________________________ DOB: _______MM / _______DD / _______YYYY Address: ___________________________________________________________ ICD10 Code(s): _________________/_________________/_________________ City: _______________________________ State: ________ Zip: __________ ICD-10 Codes are required for billing. When ordering tests for which reimbursement will be sought, order only those tests that are medically necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of the patient. Phone: _________________________ Fax: ___________________________ Billing & Collection Information NPI: _____________________________________ Patient Demographic/Billing/Insurance Form is required to be submitted with this form. Most genetic testing requires insurance prior authorization. Due to high insurance deductibles and member policy benefits, patients may elect to self-pay. Call for more information (855.916.4362) Bill Client or Institution Client Name: ______________________________________________________ Client Code/Number: _____________ Bill Insurance Prior authorization or reference number: __________________________________________ Patient Self-Pay Call for pricing and payment options Toll
    [Show full text]
  • The FOXM1/BRIP1 Axis in Replicative Stress Induced DNA Damage Response in Neuroblastoma
    Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences The FOXM1/BRIP1 axis in replicative stress induced DNA damage response in neuroblastoma: functional exploration and zebrafish modeling This thesis is submitted as fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Health Sciences by Suzanne Vanhauwaert, 2017 Promoter: Prof. dr. Frank Speleman Co-promoter: Prof. dr. Katleen De Preter I II Thesis submitted to fulfill the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Health Sciences Promoter Prof. dr. Frank Speleman Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Co-promoter Prof. dr. Katleen De Preter Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Members of the examination committee Shizhen Zhu MD, PhD Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW Rochester, MN 55905 Rochester, Minnesota, USA Anna Sablina, PhD VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology O&N 4, Leuven, Belgium Kathleen Claes, PhD Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Tom Van Maerken, MD, PhD Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Steven Goossens, PhD Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Joni Van der Meulen, PhD Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Statement of confidentiality: The information in this document is confidential to the person to whom it is addressed and should not be disclosed to any other person. It may not be reproduced in whole, or in part, nor may any of the information contained therein be disclosed without the prior consent of the author. The research described here was conducted at the Center for Medical Genetics (Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium) and Dana Farber Cancer Institute (Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA) and funded by grants from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), the Flemish League against Cancer (VLK) and Villa Joep.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2: Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Pathway Genes in Italian Families with Breast/Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancers
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2: Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Pathway Genes in Italian Families with Breast/Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancers 1,2, 1,2, 3,4 2 2 Aldo Germani y, Simona Petrucci y, Laura De Marchis , Fabio Libi , Camilla Savio , Claudio Amanti 2,5, Adriana Bonifacino 2,5, Barbara Campanella 6, Carlo Capalbo 2,7 , Augusto Lombardi 2,5 , Stefano Maggi 2,5, Mauro Mattei 2, Mattia Falchetto Osti 2,6 , Patrizia Pellegrini 1,2, Annarita Speranza 2, Gianluca Stanzani 2, Valeria Vitale 2 , Antonio Pizzuti 8,9, Maria Rosaria Torrisi 1,2 and Maria Piane 1,2,* 1 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (M.R.T.) 2 Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (F.L.); [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (M.F.O.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (V.V.) 3 Department of Radiological Anatomopathological, Oncological Science, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 Umberto I University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy 5 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Vistaseq GYN Cancer Panel
    VistaSeq® GYN Cancer Panel Specimen ID: Control ID: Acct#: Phone: TESTING Patient Details Specimen Details Physycian Details DOB: Date collected: Ordering: Age (yyy/mm/dd): Date received: Referring: Gender: Date entered: ID: Patient ID: Date reported: NPI: POSITIVE At least one clinically significant variant was detected. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION NOTE VARIANT GENE CLASSIFICATION ZYGOSITY AMINO ACID CHANGE CANCER RISK DETECTED + BRIP1 LIKELY Het c.2765T>G p.Leu922X HIGH PATHOGENIC Variant Summary: A heterozygous c.2765T>G (p.Leu922X) likely pathogenic variant was detected in exon 19 of BRIP1. This nonsense variant is predicted to result in a premature termination codon and has been previously reported in ClinVar, in general population databases, and in the literature in an individual with breast cancer as well as in a high-risk unaffected control (Couch 2015, Ramus 2015). A recent publication by Easton (2016) suggests some truncating BRIP1 variants may not be associated with a substantial increase in breast cancer risk, however they suggest there is clinical utility for predicting ovarian cancer risk. Therefore, this variant has been classified as likely to be associated with an increased risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer. (NM_032043; hg19 chr17:g.59763337) BRIP1 (BRCA1-interacting protein 1 ; OMIM 605882) encodes a DNA helicase that functions as a tumor suppressor via its interaction with BRCA1. BRIP1 is essential for normal DNA repair and genomic stability. Heterozygous germline mutations in BRIP1 have been identified and associated with familial breast and ovarian cancers. Biallelic germline BRIP mutations may cause Fanconi anemia. Clinical Significance: High Cancer Risk This mutation is clinically significant and is associated with an increased cancer risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutation Analysis of in Male Breast Cancer Cases
    Mutation analysis of in male breast cancer cases: a population-based study in Central Italy Valentina Silvestri, Piera Rizzolo, Mario Falchetti, Ines Zanna, Giovanna Masala, Simonetta Bianchi, Domenico Palli, Laura Ottini To cite this version: Valentina Silvestri, Piera Rizzolo, Mario Falchetti, Ines Zanna, Giovanna Masala, et al.. Mutation analysis of in male breast cancer cases: a population-based study in Central Italy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Springer Verlag, 2010, 126 (2), pp.539-543. 10.1007/s10549-010-1289-x. hal-00601173 HAL Id: hal-00601173 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00601173 Submitted on 17 Jun 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. BRIEF REPORT Running head: BRIP1 variants in male breast cancer cases Mutation analysis of BRIP1 in male breast cancer cases: a population-based study in Central Italy. Valentina Silvestri1*, Piera Rizzolo1*, Mario Falchetti1, Ines Zanna2, Giovanna Masala2, Simonetta Bianchi3, Domenico Palli2 and Laura Ottini1^ 1Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome; 2Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute-ISPO, 50139 Florence; 3Department of Pathology, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy. * These Authors equally contributed to the work ^Corresponding author: Laura Ottini Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIP-1 Germline Mutation and Its Role in Colon Cancer: Presentation of Two Case Reports and Review of Literature Mir Ali* , Celia Dawn Delozier and Uzair Chaudhary
    Ali et al. BMC Medical Genetics (2019) 20:75 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-019-0812-0 CASE REPORT Open Access BRIP-1 germline mutation and its role in colon cancer: presentation of two case reports and review of literature Mir Ali* , Celia Dawn Delozier and Uzair Chaudhary Abstract Background: Hereditary colon cancer is characterized by the inheritance of an abnormal gene mutation which predisposes to malignancy. Recent advances in genomic medicine have identified mutations in “novel” genes as conferring an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Mutations in the BRIP1 gene (BRCA1 Interacting Protein C- terminal helicase 1) are known to increase the risk of ovarian and breast cancers, but this genes association with colon cancer has not been previously reported. Case presentation: We describe two patients with colon cancer whose tumor tissue were found to harbor BRIP1 mutations on analysis by next-generation sequencing. These patients were confirmed by analysis of lymphocytes to carry the mutation in the germline as well. Conclusions: These case reports highlight a previously unreported association of BRIP1 germline mutations with colon cancer predisposition. Keywords: Colorectal Cancer, Germline mutation, BRIP1 gene, Case report Background with mutations in that specific gene. Similarly, the iden- Colon cancer is the third most common cause of tification of additional new pathogenic mutations which cancer-related mortality in the United States [1]. Be- may be involved in the development of colon cancer can tween 2 to 5% of all colon cancers arise in the setting of provide us with valuable information for screening and well-defined inherited colon cancer syndromes including patient counseling.
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance of DNA Repair Gene Polymorphisms to Gastric Cancer Risk and Phenotype
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 22), pp: 35848-35862 Research Paper Relevance of DNA repair gene polymorphisms to gastric cancer risk and phenotype Patricia Carrera-Lasfuentes1, Angel Lanas1,2,3,4, Luis Bujanda1,5, Mark Strunk1,6, Enrique Quintero7, Santos Santolaria8, Rafael Benito1,2,9, Federico Sopeña1,2,3, Elena Piazuelo1,2,6, Concha Thomson10, Angeles Pérez-Aisa11, David Nicolás-Pérez7, Elizabeth Hijona1,5, Jesús Espinel12, Rafael Campo13, Marisa Manzano14, Fernando Geijo15, María Pellise1,16, Manuel Zaballa17, Ferrán González-Huix18, Jorge Espinós19, Llúcia Titó20, Luis Barranco21, Mauro D’Amato22, María Asunción García-González1,2,6 1CIBER de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain 2Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain 4Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain 5Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain 6Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain 7Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB), Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias (CIBICAN), Tenerife, Spain 8Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, Spain 9Faculty of Medicine and Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Zaragoza, Spain 10Department
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Germline Mutations in Melanoma Patients with Early Onset, Double Primary Tumors, Or Family Cancer History by N
    biomedicines Article Identification of Germline Mutations in Melanoma Patients with Early Onset, Double Primary Tumors, or Family Cancer History by NGS Analysis of 217 Genes 1,2, 1, 2 3 Lenka Stolarova y, Sandra Jelinkova y, Radka Storchova , Eva Machackova , Petra Zemankova 1, Michal Vocka 4 , Ondrej Kodet 5,6,7 , Jan Kral 1, Marta Cerna 1, Zuzana Volkova 1, Marketa Janatova 1, Jana Soukupova 1 , Viktor Stranecky 8, Pavel Dundr 9, Lenka Foretova 3, Libor Macurek 2 , Petra Kleiblova 10 and Zdenek Kleibl 1,* 1 Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (P.Z.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (Z.V.); [email protected] (M.J.); [email protected] (J.S.) 2 Laboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (L.M.) 3 Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] (E.M.); [email protected] (L.F.) 4 Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] 5 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University
    [Show full text]
  • Mutational Analysis of Thirty-Two Double-Strand DNA Break Repair Genes in Breast and Pancreatic Cancers
    Priority Report Mutational Analysis of Thirty-two Double-Strand DNA Break Repair Genes in Breast and Pancreatic Cancers Xianshu Wang,1 Csilla Szabo,1 Chiping Qian,3 Peter G. Amadio,1 Stephen N. Thibodeau,1 James R. Cerhan,2 Gloria M. Petersen,2 Wanguo Liu,3 and Fergus J. Couch1 Departments of 1Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and 2Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota and 3Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana Abstract that mutations in other DNA damage repair genes may predispose and/or contribute to breast cancer. Similarly, the recent discovery Inactivating mutations in several genes that encode compo- BRCA2, FANCC FANCG nents of the DNA repair machinery have been associated with that mutations in , and (2, 11, 12) are an increased risk of breast cancer. To assess whether associated with pancreatic cancer suggests that mutations in other alterations in other DNA repair genes contribute to breast repair genes may contribute to pancreatic cancer risk. To identify cancer and to further determine the relevance of these genes other DNA repair genes associated with breast and pancreatic to pancreatic cancer, we performed mutational analysis of 32 cancer, we performed a mutation screen of the coding regions of 32 genes involved in DSB signaling and repair in 38 breast tumors, DNA double-strand break repair genes in genomic DNA from BRCA1/ BRCA1/ 48 pancreatic tumors, and germline DNA from 10 non- 38 breast tumors, 48 pancreatic tumors, and 10 non- BRCA2 BRCA2 hereditary breast cancer patients. A total of 494 coding hereditary breast cancer patients.
    [Show full text]