DOCSLIB.ORG

Azerbaijan Republic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Azerbaijan Republic Country Study on Biodiversity of Azerbaijan Republic Fourth National Report to Convention of Biological Diversity Baku - 2010 This document has been prepared under requirements of the Convention of Biological Diversity and involves current status of biological diversity in the territory of Azerbaijan Republic and factors impacted upon it. The report has been drafted in the presence of all concerned parties and it based upon the opinions and proposals of the related specialists. Therefore, a deep gratitude is expressed to authors staff of the First National Report on the Convention of Biological Diversity which plays as a framework document, for preparation of the Second National Report on the Convention of Biological Diversity. Views and standpoints suggested in this collection express opinions of the authors and could not coincide with opinions of the United Nations or the United Nations Development Programme. Country Study on Biodiversity and Fourth National Report The Republic of Azerbaijan Contents Introduction (Country Context and Socio-economic context)………………7 Chapter 1. Overview of Biodiversity Status, Trends and Treats.................. 23 1.1. Status of Biodiversity and Ecosystems............................................................... 24 1.1.1. Status and quality of research on ecosystems and species......................24 1.1.2. Biogeography..........................................................................................24 1.1.3. Status review of ecosystems....................................................................25 1.1.4. Status review of plant communities and habitats....................................30 1.1.4.1. Description of key plant communities......................................30 1.1.4.2. Rare, endemic or threatened plant communities habitats........ 31 1.1.5. Status review of species...........................................................................31 1.1.5.1 . Microorganisms........................................................................31 1.1.5.2. Protozoa....................................................................................31 1.1.5.3 . Fungi.........................................................................................32 1.1.5.4. Flora.......................................................................................... 33 1.1.5.5. Fauna........................................................................................ 34 1.1.6. Key threats to biodiversity.......................................................................39 1.1.6.1. Habitat loss and modification..................................................39 1.1.6.2. Over-use of biological and natural resources.......................... 40 1.1.6.3. Pollution...................................................................................43 1.1.6.4. Introduced and invasive species............................................... 48 1.1.6.5. Natural pathogens.................................................................... 49 1.1.6.6. Climate change and natural disasters...................................... 50 1.2. Problem Analysis.................................................................................................54 1.2.1. Current status of biodiversity..................................................................54 1.2.2. Direct causes of biodiversity loss............................................................55 1.2.3. Underlying causes of biodiversity loss...................................................56 1.2.4. Key sectors affecting biodiversity..........................................................57 1.2.5. Restrictions on protection process..........................................................58 1.2.6. Opportunities for biodiversity conservation...........................................58 1.2.7. Further phases.........................................................................................59 Chapter 2. Current Status of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans……………………………………………………………………………60 2.1. Legislation and policy on use and protection of biodiversity........................... 61 2.1.1. Protection of the environment and legislation regulating this sphere.....61 2.1.2. Laws on protected areas and sites...........................................................62 2.1.3. Laws on flora and fauna.................................................................63 2.1.4. Land use and legislation for development...........................................................64 2.1.5. Laws stipulating legal bases for prevention of environmental pollution……………………………………………………………………….65 2.1.6. Legislation on other spheres impacting upon biodiversity......................65 2.1.7. International agreements and conventions..............................................66 2.2. Existing programmes for biodiversity conservation......................................... 67 2.2.1. Biodiversity inventory, monitoring and research....................................67 2.2.2. Environmental educational programmes and teaching............................67 2.2.3. Public Awareness....................................................................................68 2.2.4. Planning and intervention for conservation and restoration....................68 2.2.5. International Projects...............................................................................69 2009 3 Country Study on Biodiversity and Fourth National Report The Republic of Azerbaijan 2.3. Summary of existing measures, capacity and experience for biodiversity management............................................................................................................................. 70 Chapter 3. Sectoral and cross-sectoral integration or mainstreaming of biodiversity considerations................................................................................71 3.1. Use and values of biodiversity............................................................................. 72 31.1. Agrobiodiversity......................................................................................72 3.1.1.1. Crops under cultivation............................................................72 3.1.1.2. Wild ancestors of crops............................................................ 73 3.1.1.3. Livestock diversity....................................................................74 3.1.1.4. Wild relatives of domesticated livestock..................................74 3.1.2. Wild species of economic importance....................................................75 3.1.2.1. Use of wild plants..................................................................... 75 3.1.2.2. Use of wild animals.................................................................. 77 3.1.2.3. Evaluation of sustainability of use of wild species................... 78 3.1.3. Use of biodiversity for biotechnology and genetic collections.............. 78 3.1.4. Indirect uses of biodiversity....................................................................79 3.1.5. Cultural or traditional values of biodiversity...........................................79 3.1.5.1. Wildlife and national cuisine....................................................79 3.1.5.2. Arts, folklore, and music........................................................... 79 3.1.5.3. Spiritual values of biodiversity................................................. 80 3.1.5.4. Recreation and biodiversity......................................................80 3.2. Key economic sectors affecting biodiversity.....................................................81 3.2.1. Agriculture...............................................................................................81 3.2.2. Forestry....................................................................................................86 3.2.3. Fisheries...................................................................................................88 3.2.4. Industry....................................................................................................89 3.2.5. Construction............................................................................................91 3.2.6. Mining industry..................................................................................... .92 3.2.7. Energy and oil extraction........................................................................ 95 3.2.8. Transport..................................................................................................97 3.2.9. Tourism....................................................................................................98 Chapter 4. Conclusions: Progress Towards the 2010 Target and Implementation of the Strategic Plan ............. ………………………….…. 100 4.1. Protected areas system.......................................................................................101 4.1.1. Description of status, location and scope of protected areas.................101 4.1.2. Evaluation of gaps in protected areas system........................................106 4.2. Conservation outside Protected Areas............................................................ 107 4.2.1. In situ conservation measures in the wider landscape...........................107 4.2.2. Ex situ conservation..............................................................................107 4.3. Organizations involved in biodiversity conservation and management....... 108 4.3.1. Government structures and agencies.....................................................108
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nagorno-Karabakh's
    Nagorno-Karabakh’s Gathering War Clouds Europe Report N°244 | 1 June 2017 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Ongoing Risks of War ....................................................................................................... 2 A. Military Tactics .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Potential Humanitarian Implications ....................................................................... 6 III. Shifts in Public Moods and Policies ................................................................................. 8 A. Azerbaijan’s Society ................................................................................................... 8 1. Popular pressure on the government ................................................................... 8 2. A tougher stance ................................................................................................... 10 B. Armenia’s Society ....................................................................................................... 12 1. Public mobilisation and anger
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Prisoners in Azerbaijan1
    Declassified AS/Jur (2019) 01 22 January 2019 ajdoc01 2019 Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Political prisoners in Azerbaijan1 Introductory Memorandum Rapporteur: Ms Thorhildur Sunna ÆVARSDÓTTIR, Iceland, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group 1 Introduction 1.1. Procedure 1. On 1 June 2018, the motion for a resolution on “Political prisoners in Azerbaijan” (Doc. 14538) was referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights for report.2 I was appointed rapporteur by the Committee at its meeting in Strasbourg on 26 June 2018. 1.2. Issues at stake 2. The issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan has been of concern to the Council of Europe since the time of the country’s accession. Following the 2001 examination of cases by the independent experts of the Secretary General (SG/Inf(2001)34, discussed below), the Parliamentary Assembly, in its Resolution 1272 (2002) on political prisoners in Azerbaijan, reiterated that no-one may be imprisoned for political reasons in a Council of Europe member state. In its Resolution 1359 (2004), the Assembly “formally ask[ed] the government of Azerbaijan for the immediate release on humanitarian grounds of political prisoners whose state of health is very critical, prisoners whose trials were illegal, prisoners having been political activists or eminent members of past governments, and members of their families, friends or persons who were linked to them … [and] the remaining political prisoners already identified on the experts' list.” In 2005, the Assembly adopted Resolution 1457 and Recommendation 1711, recalling its previous resolutions and, inter alia, calling on the Committee of Ministers to join it in adopting a joint position on the issue of political prisoners in Azerbaijan.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Acta Naturalia Pannonica 11 (2016)
    3. Európa és a Földközi-tenger térségének búska- és pillangó- faunájának magyar nevekkel ellátott fajjegyzéke Az eddigieket kiegészítve, a Tshikolovets (2011) által leközölt fajjegyzék nyomán bemutatom az Európában és a Földközi-tenger térségében előforduló Pillangóalakú lepkék magyar elnevezéseit. Ez olvasható a következőkben. A fajok család, alcsalád és tribusz szerint kerülnek felsorolásra. A rendszertani kategóriákat követően olvasható az odasorolt fajok tudományos és magyar elneve- zése. A tribuszokon belül a fajnevek betűrendben követik egymást. A jegyzékben kövér betűk jelzik a Kárpát-medencében honos vagy kipusztult, vagy az egyetlen vagy néhány példány alapján jelzett fajokat. Ez utóbbi fajok egy ré- sze valóban tenyészett vagy csak ideiglenesen megtelepülő lehetett. Néhány faj elő- fordulási adata viszont bizonyosan elcédulázott vagy félrehatározott példányokon alapult. A tudományos nevek Tshikolovets névjegyzékét követik.(16) A latin név után megadom Tshikolovets könyv oldalszám-hivatkozását, ahol a fajt ábraanyag és rö- vid szöveg mutatja be. Ez után a Gozmány-féle magyar név következik, ami gyakor- latilag a Hétnyelvű Szótár (Gozmány 1979) névanyaga. A kéziratos nevek (Gozmány kézirat, vö. 8. ábra) csak akkor kerülnek felsorolásra, ha a faj a szótárból kimaradt, vagy a név különbözik az ott olvasható névtől. A Gozmány-féle nevek után az álta- lam javasoltak olvashatók (Bálint 2006 és 2008). Sok fajnak nem volt még magyar neve, ezeknek újat adok. Minden ilyen esetet külön jelzek. Bár a Gozmány-féle faji jelzőket igyekeztem megtartani, azoktól szakmai okok miatt számos esetben el kellett térjek. Ezek megindoklásától eltekintek, mivel az je- lentősen megnövelné ennek a munkának a terjedelmét. Viszont a névjegyzék után következő fejezetben megadom a rendszertani kategóriák képzéséhez használt tu- dományos és magyar nevek magyarázatát.
    [Show full text]
  • A Descriptive Study of Social and Economic Conditions
    55 LIFE IN NAKHICHEVAN AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC: A descriptive study of social and economic conditions Supported by UNDP/ILO Ayse Kudat Senem Kudat Baris Sivri Social Assessment, LLC July 15, 2002 55 56 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary and Next Steps Preface Characteristics of the Region History Governance Demographics Household Demographics and Employment Conditions Employment/ Unemployment Education Economic Assessment Government Expenditures NAR’s Economic Statistics Household Expenditure Structure Income Structure Housing Conditions Determinants of Welfare Agriculture Sector in NAR Water Electricity Financing Feed for Livestock Magnitude of Land Holding Subsidies Markets NAR Region District By District Infrastructure Sector Energy Power Generation Natural Gas Project Water Supply Transportation Social Infrastructure 56 57 Health Education Enterprise Sector People’s Priorities Issues Relating to Income Generation Trust and Vision Money and Banking Community Development ARRA Damage Assessment for the Region Other Donor Activities 57 58 Summary and Next Steps The 354,000 people who live in the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic (NAR) present a unique development challenge for the Government of Azerbaijan and for the international community. Cut off and blockaded from the rest of Azerbaijan as a result of the conflict with Armenia, their traditional economic structure and markets destroyed by the collapse of the former Soviet Union, their physical and social infrastructure hampered by a decade or more of lack of maintenance and rehabilitation funding, NAR’s present status is worse than much of the rest of the country and its prospects for the future require imagination and innovative thinking. This report deals with the challenges of NAR today and what peoples’ priorities are for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Response Variations of Alnus Subcordata (L.), Populus Deltoides (Bartr
    Taiwan J For Sci 27(3): 251-63, 2012 251 Research paper Response Variations of Alnus subcordata (L.), Populus deltoides (Bartr. ex Marsh.), and Taxodium distichum (L.) Seedlings to Flooding Stress Ehsán Ghanbary,1) Masoud Tabari,1,4) Francisco García-Sánchez,2) Mehrdad Zarafshar,1) Maria Cristina Sanches3) 【Summary】 Alnus subcordata is a native species distributed along bottomlands of Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. In the last decade, this species along with the exotic species Populus deltoides and Taxodium distichum, has been widely used also for afforestation of bottomland areas. However, the relative flooding tolerance of these 3 species and their potential mechanisms for coping with flooding conditions are unknown to the present. Thus, in this study, variations in growth and mor- phophysiological responses to flooding of these species’ seedlings were investigated during a 120- d outdoor experiment. Seedlings were subjected to 3 fixed treatments of 1) unflooded, 2) flooded to 3 cm in depth, and 3) flooded to 15 cm in depth, and their survival, growth, and some metabolic parameters were measured at the end of the experiment. Survival in seedlings of these 3 species was very high, but the root length, biomass accumulation, and chlorophyll content were reduced by flooding. Diameter growth in T. distichum increased with flooding, while it was negatively affected in the other 2 species. The leaf area, specific leaf area, and height growth were reduced in A. sub- cordata and P. deltoides by flooding, while no significant effect on these parameters was observed in T. distichum. Flooding also induced the formation of hypertrophied lenticels, and adventitious roots in all 3 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Description of Recent Discovery of Anthocharis Damone
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Drndic, E.; Radevski, D.; Miljevic, M.; Duric, M.; Popovic, M. Description of recent discovery of Anthocharis damone Boisduval, 1836 in Serbia and its distribution in Europe (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 45, núm. 177, marzo, 2017, pp. 23-29 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45550375003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 45 (177) marzo 2017: 23-29 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Description of recent discovery of Anthocharis damone Boisduval, 1836 in Serbia and its distribution in Europe (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) E. Drndi c, D¯ . Radevski, M. Miljevi c, M. D¯ uri c & M. Popovi c Abstract Anthocharis damone Boisduval, 1836 is known from southern Italy, Greece, Republic of Macedonia, Albania and further in the Middle East. At the end of May and beginning of June 2015 it was recorded for the first time in Serbia. A single isolated colony was found 170 km NW from the northernmost known locality in Europe. This record made us review A. damone distribution in Europe, suggested its possibly wider range over the Balkans and increased the list of butterflies recorded in Serbia to a total of 200 species. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Pieridae, Isatis tinctoria , conservation, Red List, Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development 2003-2005 Azerbaijan Progresses Toward the Achievement of the Mill
    STATE PROGRAMME ON POVERTY REDUCTION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2003-2005 AZERBAIJAN PROGRESSES TOWARD THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS PROGRESS REPORT – 2003/2004 BAKU – 2005 DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN on Approval of the State Programme on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2003-2005 The consistent reform program carried out in the Republic of Azerbaijan in recent years has helped to ensure economic development, gradual improvement of macroeconomic performance and improvement of the living standards in the country. Thus, in the period 1996-2002, Gross Domestic Product increased by 1.7 times, capital investment increased by 7.8 times, nominal monetary income of population increased by 3 times and average monthly wages and pensions increased by 5 times. There are improvements in other economic performance indicators. However, these ongoing efforts and achievements have not yet led to a sufficiently high level of economic development and the living standards of the population have still not reached international standards: part of population is still unemployed, minimum wages are not sufficient to meet the minimum subsistence level and a number of factors causing poverty have not been eliminated. In order to further strengthen social protection of the population for the near future, ensure poverty reduction in the country and implement necessary measures to meet the commitments of the 2000 United Nations Millennium Summit, I hereby decree: 1. The “State Program on Poverty Reduction and Economic Development in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2003-2005” shall be approved. 2. The Ministry of Economic Development of the Republic of Azerbaijan shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of measures set out in the State Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Baseline Study of Avian Fauna of Sukkur Riverine Forests, Sindh, Pakistan
    Report on Baseline study of Avian Fauna of Sukkur Riverine Forests, Sindh, Pakistan Project title: Sustainable forest management to secure multiple benefits in Pakistan's high conservation value forests 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONTENTS PAGE # 2. List of Figures and Tables 02 3. Project Brief 03 4. Summary 07 5. Introduction 08 6. Methodology 10 7. Results & Discussion 12 8. Threats and Recommendation 15 9. References 16 List of Figures and Tables 1 Fig. 1. Map of Study Area 11 2 Fig. 2. Order Wise Species Richness Recorded From Study 13 Area 3 Fig. 3. Family Wise Species Richness Recorded From 14 Study Area 1 Table 1. Checklist of Avian Fauna Recorded From Study 18 Area 2 Project Brief Project Title: Sustainable forest management to secure multiple benefits in Pakistan's high conservation value forestss Duration: Five years (January 2017 to December 2021) Project Areas: i). Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Temperate forest) ii). Sind (Riverine forest) iii. Punjab (Scrub forest and Riverine forest) Project objective: The objective of the proposed project is to promote sustainable forest management in Pakistan's Western Himalayan Temperate coniferous, Sub-tropical broadleaved evergreen thorn (Scrub) and Riverine forests for biodiversity conservation, mitigation of climate change and securing of forest ecosystem services. In particular, it aims at implementation of three inter-related and mutually complementary components that are focussed at addressing the barriers of inadequate planning, regulatory and institutional frameworks to integrated forest resource
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]