Joseph Lane, Phd Thesis for Library 10.04.18

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joseph Lane, Phd Thesis for Library 10.04.18 The London School of Economics and Political Science Networks, Innovation and Knowledge: The North Staffordshire Potteries, 1750-1851 Joseph Peter Lane A thesis submitted in the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2017 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of the thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement if made. The thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 76,744 words. 2 Abstract During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the industrial district of the North Staffordshire Potteries dominated the British earthenware industry, producing local goods that sold in global markets. Over this time the region experienced consistent growth in output, an extreme spatial concentration of physical and human capital, and became home to some of the most famous Master Potters in the world. The Potteries was also characterised by a growing body of useful and practical knowledge about the materials, processes and skills required to produce world-leading earthenware. This thesis exploits this striking example of a highly concentrated and highly skilled craft-based industry during a period of sustained growth and development which offers a rich opportunity to contribute to several strands of economic and business history. This thesis presents and analyses new empirical evidence based on trade directories to examine the organisational evolution of the district. It reconstructs the district at the firm level, showing that the region’s growth was incredibly dynamic. The spatial concentration of producers and the importance of social and business networks are also explored through a new map of the region in 1802 and social network analysis. As a study of a craft-based, highly skilled industry without a legacy of formal institutions such as guilds to govern and protect access to knowledge, this thesis also offers substantial empirical and historiographical contributions to the study of knowledge and innovation during the period of the Industrial Revolution. It presents a new database of pottery patents alongside a variety of qualitative evidence such as trade literature, exhibition catalogues, advertisements and sales catalogues. Quantitative and qualitative analysis reveals the low propensity to patent in the North Staffordshire pottery industry, and provides a new typology of knowledge used in the industry. It argues that the types of knowledge being created and disseminated influenced the behaviour of producers substantially, and this typology of knowledge is far more complex than those established tacit/explicit divisions favoured in historical study and the social sciences more broadly. The findings of this thesis allow us to answer numerous outstanding questions concerning the development of the North Staffordshire Potteries during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. When brought together in such a way, the complementary strands of research and findings presented offer a coherent narrative of an extremely complex and dynamic cluster of production that both challenges and confirms traditional historiographical tradition concerning industrial districts. 3 Acknowledgements This thesis is dedicated to my wife, Helen. Thanks for putting up with me being a student since we met, it can’t have been easy. Your support for my studies and my research has been immense. This thesis could not have been written without your patience and encouragement...I know you will enjoy reading it in its entirety. To Mum and Dad, without you I would never have started my undergraduate degree in history a decade ago. You have given everything to help make me who and I am, and for that, I am eternally grateful. I was lucky to have two fantastic supervisors, Mary Morgan and Gerben Bakker. Their careful and considered guidance since receiving my PhD proposal has seen me through and out the other side with my enthusiasm for research intact! They challenged me intellectually, provided conceptual clarity when I couldn’t see the wood for the trees, and always pushed me to think, think and think some more. Thank you. I also thank my examiners, Giorgio Riello and Anna Spadavecchia for reading my work intently and for a lively and enjoyable viva. This revised version of the thesis is immeasurably improved thanks to your comments and guidance. The economic history community at the LSE has been the perfect environment in which to work through the PhD process. Faculty and fellow PhD students have been a great source of support and academic rigour, through weekly graduate seminars and more casual discussions over coffee, or more likely, a pint. Linda, Tracy, Helena and Lorraine kept the department running like a well-oiled machine and were great colleagues to have over these years. My particular thanks go to the new friends I have made along the way, especially my coffee and walking buddies, Franz and Maxine, who so often read my work and acted as sounding boards for new ideas and offered honest and frank impressions. I would also like to thank Esther Sahle and Michael Aldous, who, despite having flown the LSE nest several years earlier than I, have continued to generously offer their experience, advice and friendship to help me through various stages of the research process. In life’s adventures, I am lucky to have the support of old friends, Mark and Pete: the other two legs of the tripod, still standing two decades later. Thanks for everything. The research for this thesis was supported financially by an Economic and Social Research Council Scholarship (no. 1351225). Without this generous funding, I would not have been able to undertake these studies. The final version of this thesis was proof-read whilst in the brilliant company of my eight-week-old son, so please forgive any remaining errors. As I contemplate life with a young family after a PhD, the words of Monty Python seem rather apt… “And now for something completely different” Joe Lane, Oxhey, April 2018. 4 Contents Part One: The Industrial District 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Thesis Outline ................................................................................................ 14 2 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 18 2.1 Industrial Districts.......................................................................................... 22 2.2 Networks ........................................................................................................ 44 3 The organisation of a district and the evolution of firms ....................................... 57 3.1 The early stages of an industrial district ........................................................ 57 3.2 Spatial proximity ........................................................................................... 71 3.3 Reconstructing the district ............................................................................. 80 3.4 The organisation of the district ...................................................................... 85 3.5 The dynamics of growth ................................................................................ 94 4 Networks, identity and cooperation ..................................................................... 111 4.1 Cooperative competition .............................................................................. 113 4.2 Egocentric network analysis ........................................................................ 120 5 Conclusion to Part One ........................................................................................ 142 Part Two: Innovation, Knowledge and Secrets 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 148 6.1 Literature Review ........................................................................................ 152 6.2 Sources for the study of invention and innovation ...................................... 158 7 Innovation and patenting in the pottery industry ................................................. 164 7.1 Trends in pottery patenting .......................................................................... 164 7.2 Occupational distribution of patents ............................................................ 172 7.3 The geography of pottery patenting ............................................................. 181 7.4 Knowledge in patent specifications ............................................................. 190 8 Knowledge and innovation outside the patent system ......................................... 203 8.1 ‘Spilling the beans’: an insight into secret knowledge ................................ 214 9 Conclusion to Part Two ....................................................................................... 224 10 Conclusions.....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resources Report for Staffordshire
    BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT WF/95/5/ Mineral Resources Series Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints D E Highley and D G Cameron Contributors: D P Piper, D J Harrison and S Holloway Planning Consultant: J F Cowley Mineral & Resource Planning Associates This report accompanies the 1:100 000 scale maps: Staffordshire Mineral resources (other than sand and gravel) and Staffordshire Sand and Gravel Resources Cover Photograph Cauldon limestone quarry at Waterhouses, 1977.(Blue Circle Industries) British Geological Survey Photographs. No. L2006. This report is prepared for the Department of the Environment. (Contract PECD7/1/443) Bibliographic Reference Highley, D E, and Cameron, D G. 1995. Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints. British Geological Survey Technical Report WF/95/5/ © Crown copyright Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 1995 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey Offices Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and books may be purchased from BGS- Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG approved stockists and agents and over the counter at the 0115–936 3100 Fax 0115–936 3200 Bookshop, Gallery 37, Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), e-mail: sales @bgs.ac.uk www.bgs.ac.uk Cromwell Road, London. Sales desks are also located at the BGS BGS Internet Shop: London Information Office, and at Murchison House, Edinburgh. www.british-geological-survey.co.uk The London Information Office maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. Some BGS Murchison House, West Mains Road, books and reports may also be obtained from the Stationery Office Edinburgh EH9 3LA Publications Centre or from the Stationery Office bookshops and 0131–667 1000 Fax 0131–668 2683 agents.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Ceramic Arts
    Profile No.: 38 NIC Code: 23933 CEREMIC ARTS 1. INTRODUCTION: Ceramic art is art made from ceramic materials, including clay. It may take forms including art ware, tile, figurines, sculpture, and tableware. Ceramic art is one of the arts, particularly the visual arts. Of these, it is one of the plastic arts. While some ceramics are considered fine art, some are considered to be decorative, industrial or applied art objects. Ceramics may also be considered artifacts in archaeology. Ceramic art can be made by one person or by a group of people. In a pottery or ceramic factory, a group of people design, manufacture and decorate the art ware. Products from a pottery are sometimes referred to as "art pottery".[1] In a one-person pottery studio, ceramists or potters produce studio pottery. Most traditional ceramic products were made from clay (or clay mixed with other materials), shaped and subjected to heat, and tableware and decorative ceramics are generally still made this way. In modern ceramic engineering usage, ceramics is the art and science of making objects from inorganic, non-metallic materials by the action of heat. It excludes glass and mosaic made from glass tesserae. There is a long history of ceramic art in almost all developed cultures, and often ceramic objects are all the artistic evidence left from vanished cultures. Elements of ceramic art, upon which different degrees of emphasis have been placed at different times, are the shape of the object, its decoration by painting, carving and other methods, and the glazing found on most ceramics. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lcuk Cauldon Quarries Studies
    LCUK CAULDON WORKS, STAFFORDSHIRE Revised Phase 3 & 4 Proposals Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Assessment Prepared for: Lafarge Cement UK Cauldon Works Yelsway Road Cauldon STOKE-ON-TRENT Staffordshire ST10 3EQ By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 63505.01 September 2009 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2009, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 LCUK Cauldon Works Archaeological & Cultural Heritage Assessment LCUK CAULDON WORKS, STAFFORDSHIRE Revised Phase 3 & 4 Proposals Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Assessment Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background....................................................................................1 1.2 Site Location and Topography....................................................................1 1.3 Legislative and Planning Background ........................................................2 2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................5 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................5 2.2 Staffordshire Historic Environment Record ................................................5 2.3 Aerial Photographs.....................................................................................5 2.4 Cartographic Sources.................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoke on Trent and the Potteries from Stone | UK Canal Boating
    UK Canal Boating Telephone : 01395 443545 UK Canal Boating Email : [email protected] Escape with a canal boating holiday! Booking Office : PO Box 57, Budleigh Salterton. Devon. EX9 7ZN. England. Stoke on Trent and the Potteries from Stone Cruise this route from : Stone View the latest version of this pdf Stoke-on-Trent-and-the-Potteries-from-Stone-Cruising-Route.html Cruising Days : 4.00 to 0.00 Cruising Time : 11.50 Total Distance : 18.00 Number of Locks : 24 Number of Tunnels : 0 Number of Aqueducts : 0 The Staffordshire Potteries is the industrial area encompassing the six towns, Tunstall, Burslem, Hanley, Stoke, Fenton and Longton that now make up the city of Stoke-on-Trent in Staffordshire, England. With an unrivalled heritage and very bright future, Stoke-on-Trent (affectionately known as The Potteries), is officially recognised as the World Capital of Ceramics. Visit award winning museums and visitor centres, see world renowned collections, go on a factory tour and meet the skilled workers or have a go yourself at creating your own masterpiece! Come and buy from the home of ceramics where quality products are designed and manufactured. Wedgwood, Portmeirion, Aynsley, Emma Bridgewater, Burleigh and Moorcroft are just a few of the leading brands you will find here. Search for a bargain in over 20 pottery factory shops in Stoke-on-Trent or it it's something other than pottery that you want, then why not visit intu Potteries? Cruising Notes Day 1 As you are on the outskirts of Stone, you may like to stay moored up and visit the town before leaving.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Ancestry of William Clowes Transcription of Sketch in The
    The Ancestry of William Clowes Transcription of Sketch in the Primitive Methodist Magazine by A.A. Birchenough Part 1 ALTHOUGH belonging to the people, the principal founders of the Primitive Methodist Church were proud of their distinguished forbears, and of the wealthy families with which they were connected. Walford, who had married a niece of Hugh Bourne’s, asserts that “the ancestors of the Bourne family were Normans, and came into England with William the Conqueror. They settled in North Staffordshire, where their descendants, bearing the name of Bourne, are very numerous; but the estates obtained by the Conquest have long passed from the family, and are now in other hands.” Lorenzo Dow, whose preaching and writings influenced Hugh Bourne to hold his first Camp Meeting on the Cheshire slopes of Mow Hill, claimed descent from the same family of Staffordshire Parkers, whose sons became entitled as the Earls of Macclesfield, and have played an important part in English national life. On his maternal side, William Clowes was descended from an old and distinguished family who for several centuries had been resident in North Staffordshire. Mrs. Ann Clowes, the mother of the great evangelist, was a daughter of Mr. Aaron Wedgwood, whom Clowes describes in his interesting “Journals” as “an extensive manufacturer in the pottery department in conjunction with Mr. William Littler.” These co-partners were brothers-in-law, for Mr. Aaron Wedgwood had married Littler’s sister. The mother of Mrs. Clowes was the daughter of a gentleman potter, who resided at a mansion at Brownhills, midway between the towns of Burslem and Tunstall.
    [Show full text]
  • 5556 the LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBEK 18, 1864. the Company, and the Rates, Tolls, and Duties North Staffordshire Railway
    5556 THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBEK 18, 1864. the Company, and the rates, tolls, and duties North Staffordshire Railway. payable in respect thereof as may he specified in the (Potteries Loop Line.) (Powers for North Staffordshire Railway Company To confer upon the Company further powers for to make and maintain a loop line of railway the collection and recovery of rates, tolls, and in connection \vith their railway through the duties, and for the prevention of evasion of pay- Staffordshire Potteries; to divert certain autho- ment of tolls, and for the prevention of frauds, and rized railway ; to use and maintain rail- for regulating the use of the canals or any part way at Longton, and to construct tramway at thereof, and for the prevention of damage to and Fen ton ; increase of capital; repeal and altera- obstructions in or upon the canals, towing paths, tion of provisions relating to mines and minerals feeders, wharves, works, and lands of the Company, lying under and near the Trent and Mersey or to the use of the easements, or the exercise of Canal; Amendment of Acts.) the rights of the Company for preventing the waste OTICE is hereby given, that application is of water, for regulating the use and repairs of N intended to be made to Parliament in the basins and wharves of or communicating with the ensuing Session for an Act to authorize the North canals of the Company, for securing the supply of Staffordshire Railway Company (hereinafter called water to which the Company are entitled, for " the Company,") to make and maintain the fol-
    [Show full text]
  • Caves of Missouri
    CAVES OF MISSOURI J HARLEN BRETZ Vol. XXXIX, Second Series E P LU M R I U BU N S U 1956 STATE OF MISSOURI Department of Business and Administration Division of GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND WATER RESOURCES T. R. B, State Geologist Rolla, Missouri vii CONTENT Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 5 Origin of Missouri's caves 6 Cave patterns 13 Solutional features 14 Phreatic solutional features 15 Vadose solutional features 17 Topographic relations of caves 23 Cave "formations" 28 Deposits made in air 30 Deposits made at air-water contact 34 Deposits made under water 36 Rate of growth of cave formations 37 Missouri caves with provision for visitors 39 Alley Spring and Cave 40 Big Spring and Cave 41 Bluff Dwellers' Cave 44 Bridal Cave 49 Cameron Cave 55 Cathedral Cave 62 Cave Spring Onyx Caverns 72 Cherokee Cave 74 Crystal Cave 81 Crystal Caverns 89 Doling City Park Cave 94 Fairy Cave 96 Fantastic Caverns 104 Fisher Cave 111 Hahatonka, caves in the vicinity of 123 River Cave 124 Counterfeiters' Cave 128 Robbers' Cave 128 Island Cave 130 Honey Branch Cave 133 Inca Cave 135 Jacob's Cave 139 Keener Cave 147 Mark Twain Cave 151 Marvel Cave 157 Meramec Caverns 166 Mount Shira Cave 185 Mushroom Cave 189 Old Spanish Cave 191 Onondaga Cave 197 Ozark Caverns 212 Ozark Wonder Cave 217 Pike's Peak Cave 222 Roaring River Spring and Cave 229 Round Spring Cavern 232 Sequiota Spring and Cave 248 viii Table of Contents Smittle Cave 250 Stark Caverns 256 Truitt's Cave 261 Wonder Cave 270 Undeveloped and wild caves of Missouri 275 Barry County 275 Ash Cave
    [Show full text]
  • March 2007 Volume 8 Issue 1 T RENTON POTTERIES
    March 2007 Volume 8 Issue 1 T RENTON POTTERIES Newsletter of the Potteries of Trenton Society Mayer’s Pottery and a Portneuf /Quebec Puzzle Jacqueline Beaudry Dion and Jean-Pierre Dion Spongeware sherds found in the dump site ENT PROCESS/FEB 1st 1887” and deco- of Mayer’s Arsenal Pottery in Trenton, rated with the cut sponge chain motif so New Jersey, revealed the use of several mo- popular in England and Scotland. Many tifs including the chain or rope border that of the sponge decorated ware found in was used later in Beaver Falls, Pennsyl- the Portneuf-Quebec area (and thus vania. Those cut sponge wares, when found called Portneuf wares) were actually in the Quebec area, are dubbed “Portneuf” made in Scotland, especially those de- and generally attributed to the United picting cows and birds. Finlayson Kingdom, in particular to Scotland. The (1972:97) naturally presumed the barrel mystery of the Portneuf chain design iron- had been produced in Scotland, al- stone barrel (Finlayson, 1972:97 ) is no though his research in England and more a puzzle: a final proof of its United Scotland failed to show any record of States origin is provided by a patent such a name or such a patent. “Could granted to J. S. Mayer in 1887. this J. S. Mayer,” he wrote, “have been associated with the John Thomson Ann- he small ironstone china barrel field Pottery [Glasgow, Scotland]? Per- T found in the Province of Quebec haps his process was used in the Thom- and illustrated here (Figure 1), is ap- son Pottery.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoke on Trent Parish Register, 1754-1812
    1926-27. STOKE-UPON-TRENT. 1754-1812 Staffordshire Staffordshire fldarisb IRegisters Society. E d ito r a n d H o n . S e c r e t a r y : PERCYSample W. CountyL. ADAMS, F.S.A., Woore ‘Manor, via Crewe. Studies D e a n e r y o f S t o k e -u p o n -T r e n t . Stoke Hipon=n*ent pansb IRegtster P A R T IV. P r i v a t e l y p r i n t e d for t h e Staffordshire P a r is h R e g ister s So c i e t y . A ll Comtnu?ticafions respecting the printing and transcription oj Registers and the issue of the parts should be addressed to the Edttor. •% Attention is especially directed to Notices on inside of Cover. Staffordshire The transcription of the Registers of Stoke-upon- Trent was undertaken by the late Rev. Sanford W . Hutchinson, Vicar of Blurton. Before his death in 1919, he completed them down to the year 1797 for Births and Burials, and to 1785 in Marriages, when it was continued by Mr. E. C. SampleMiddleton, of CountyStreetly. The proofs for this Vol. have been corrected for the press by the Rev. Douglas Crick, M .A ., the present Rector of Stoke-upon- Trent. The best thanks are due from the Society to those three gentlemen for their voluntary work. P. W.L.A.Studies i^tnkr flmslj Ulster. Staffordshire Marriages, Apr. 14, 1754, to April 5th, 1796, nearly all signed by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorials of Old Staffordshire, Beresford, W
    M emorials o f the C ounties of E ngland General Editor: R e v . P. H. D i t c h f i e l d , M.A., F.S.A., F.R.S.L., F.R.Hist.S. M em orials of O ld S taffordshire B e r e s f o r d D a l e . M em orials o f O ld Staffordshire EDITED BY REV. W. BERESFORD, R.D. AU THOft OF A History of the Diocese of Lichfield A History of the Manor of Beresford, &c. , E d i t o r o f North's .Church Bells of England, &■V. One of the Editorial Committee of the William Salt Archaeological Society, &c. Y v, * W ith many Illustrations LONDON GEORGE ALLEN & SONS, 44 & 45 RATHBONE PLACE, W. 1909 [All Rights Reserved] T O T H E RIGHT REVEREND THE HONOURABLE AUGUSTUS LEGGE, D.D. LORD BISHOP OF LICHFIELD THESE MEMORIALS OF HIS NATIVE COUNTY ARE BY PERMISSION DEDICATED PREFACE H ILST not professing to be a complete survey of Staffordshire this volume, we hope, will W afford Memorials both of some interesting people and of some venerable and distinctive institutions; and as most of its contributors are either genealogically linked with those persons or are officially connected with the institutions, the book ought to give forth some gleams of light which have not previously been made public. Staffordshire is supposed to have but little actual history. It has even been called the playground of great people who lived elsewhere. But this reproach will not bear investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Ceramic Manufacturing Strategies, Marketing and Design in Response to Globalization C1990­2010
    Ewins, Neil (2013) UK Ceramic Manufacturing strategies, marketing and design in response to globalization c1990-2010. In: Design and Mobility: The Twenty- Second Annual Parsons/Cooper-Hewitt Graduate Student Symposium on the Decorative Arts and Design, 22 -23 Apr 2013, Theresa Lang Community and Student Center, Arnhold Hall, 55 West 13th Street, 2nd floor, New York. (Submitted) Downloaded from: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/3720/ Usage guidelines Please refer to the usage guidelines at http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/policies.html or alternatively contact [email protected]. Neil Ewins. Copy of paper to be delivered at Parsons, The New School of Design, New York on 23rd April 2013, for their 22nd Annual Parsons/Cooper-Hewitt symposium on the Decorative Arts and Design. The Presentation of this paper will be accompanied by Powerpoint imagery. Conference theme ‘Mobility and Design’. Sub-categories of Conference: Globalization and the mobility of cultural products. Paper title: UK ceramic manufacturing strategies, marketing and design, in response to globalization c1990-2010. Since the 1990s, ceramic exports from the Far East have surged, and UK ceramic brands have increasingly utilized cheap labour abroad, known as outsourcing. Much of the more recent behaviour of the UK ceramic industry is a reflection of globalization. Western industries have been described increasingly as ‘post Fordist’ (Amin (ed), 1994), and to many writers the impact of globalization creates deterritorialization (King (ed), 1991, p.6; Tomlinson, 1999, p.106-49). Taking their cue from Baudrillard, Lash and Urry’s analysis of ‘global sociology’ argued that ‘Objects are emptied out both of meaning (and are postmodern) and material content (and are thus post-industrial)’.
    [Show full text]