NRC Non-Light Water Reactor Vision and Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NRC Non-Light Water Reactor Vision and Strategy REVISION 1 JANUARY 31, 2020 NRC Non-Light Water Reactor (Non- LWR) Vision and Strategy, Volume 3 – Computer Code Development Plans for Severe Accident Progression, Source Term, and Consequence Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 10 1.1. Regulatory Need for Source Term Analysis ...................................................... 12 1.2. Description of Computer Codes ........................................................................ 15 2. MELCOR Development Plans for non-LWRs ........................................................ 24 2.1. HTGR ............................................................................................................... 32 2.2. SFR .................................................................................................................. 41 2.3. MSR ................................................................................................................. 49 3. SCALE Development Plans for non-LWRs ........................................................... 55 3.1. HTGR/FHR ....................................................................................................... 64 3.2. SFR/HPR .......................................................................................................... 73 3.3. MSR ................................................................................................................. 78 4. MACCS Development Plans for non-LWRs .......................................................... 83 4.1. MACCS Development for Non-LWR Site- and Location-Related Issues ........... 88 4.2. MACCS Development for Non-LWR Design-Specific Issues ............................ 91 5. Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................. 95 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 96 Appendix A. MELCOR Modeling of HTGRs ........................................................... 103 Appendix B. MELCOR Modeling of SFRs.............................................................. 131 Appendix C. MELCOR Modeling of MSRs ............................................................. 155 Appendix D. SAS4A Computer Code .................................................................... 164 Appendix E. U.S. Sodium Experiments Reviewed by SNL .................................. 167 Appendix F. Example of MELCOR Application for HTGR by International Community 174 2 FIGURES Figure 1-1. NRC Evaluation Model for NGNP (from April 2011) ....................................... 11 Figure 1-2. Radionuclide transport paths for LWR designs. ............................................. 14 Figure 1-3. Role of Accident Progression, Source Term, and Consequence Analysis Computer Codes and Applicable Regulatory Requirements .......................... 15 Figure 2-1. Timeline of MELCOR Advanced Reactor Model Development. ...................... 24 Figure 2-2. MELCOR 2.2 Validation Cases. ..................................................................... 26 Figure 2-3. Radionuclide transport paths in HTGR designs. ............................................. 33 Figure 2-4. Proposed NRC Evaluation Model for HTGRs ................................................. 35 Figure 2-5. Radionuclide release paths for pool-type SFR designs. ................................. 42 Figure 2-6. Proposed NRC Evaluation Model for Sodium Fast Reactors .......................... 42 Figure 2-7. Radionuclide release paths for salt-cooled designs. ....................................... 49 Figure 2-8. Radionuclide release paths for salt-fueled reactor designs. ........................... 50 Figure 2-9. Proposed NRC Evaluation Model for Salt Cooled Reactor ............................. 51 Figure 2-10. Proposed NRC Evaluation Model for Salt Fueled Reactor ........................... 52 Figure 3-1. Integrated capabilities of modernized SCALE 6.2. ......................................... 56 Figure 3-2. SCALE Monte Carlo Model of HTR-10 Benchmark. ....................................... 65 Figure 3-3. SCALE/Shift model of EBR-II SFR (top left: radial view of core, top right: axial view of core, lower left: radial detail of fuel assembly, lower right: radial view of fuel pin). ........................................................................................................ 75 Figure 3-4. SCALE MSR Delayed Neutron Precursor Drift Modeling. ............................... 79 3 TABLES Table 1-1. Generic Listing of Non-LWR Designs. ............................................................. 23 Table 2-1. MELCOR Non-LWR Development Plan Start Dates. ....................................... 28 Table 2-2. Yearly Deliverables – MELCOR Development Plan ........................................ 32 Table 2-3. Input/Output for MELCOR in the HTGR EM .................................................... 36 Table 2-4. Key Accident Progression Phenomena for HTGRs. ........................................ 38 Table 2-5. Proposed MELCOR Assessment Matrix for HTGRs ........................................ 39 Table 2-6. MELCOR Maturity for HTGR Analysis ............................................................. 40 Table 2-7. Proposed Input/Output for MELCOR in the SFR EM ....................................... 43 Table 2-8. Key Accident Progression Phenomena for SFRs. ........................................... 45 Table 2-9. Proposed MELCOR Assessment Matrix for SFRs ........................................... 47 Table 2-10. MELCOR Maturity for SFR Analysis .............................................................. 48 Table 2-11. Proposed input/output table for MELCOR in the MSR EM ............................. 52 Table 2-12. Key Accident Progression Development Issues for MSRs ............................. 53 Table 2-13. Proposed MELCOR Assessment Matrix for MSRs ........................................ 54 Table 2-14. MELCOR Maturity for MSR Analysis ............................................................. 54 Table 3-1. Summary of major SCALE capabilities ............................................................ 56 Table 3-2. SCALE Non-LWR Development Plan Start Dates. .......................................... 60 Table 3-3. SCALE Maturity for HTGR Analysis ................................................................ 70 Table 3-4. SCALE Maturity for FHR Analysis ................................................................... 73 Table 3-5. SCALE Maturity for SFR/HPR Analysis ........................................................... 78 Table 3-6. SCALE Maturity for MSR Analysis .................................................................. 82 Table 4-1. MACCS Non-LWR Development Plan Start Dates. ......................................... 84 Table 4-2. MACCS Maturity for Non-LWR Analysis .......................................................... 87 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes proposed code development efforts to extend NRC’s modeling and simulation capabilities for accident progression, source term, and consequence analysis for non-LWR technologies. This report describes the different types of non-LWRs as well as the modeling gaps for NRC’s computer codes including MELCOR for accident progression and source term analysis, MACCS for consequence analysis, and SCALE for radionuclide inventories. Severe accident progression, source term, and consequence analysis are deeply embedded in the NRC’s regulatory policy and practices. The licensing process is based on the concept of defense-in-depth, in which power plant design, operation, siting, and emergency planning comprise independent layers of nuclear safety. This approach encourages nuclear plant designers to incorporate several lines of defense in order to maintain the effectiveness of physical barriers between radiation hazards and workers, members of the public, and the environment – for both normal operation and accident conditions. The various regulatory source terms, used in conjunction with the design basis accidents, establish and confirm the design basis of the nuclear facility, including items important to safety, ensuring that the plant design meets the safety and numerical radiological criteria set forth in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (e.g., 10 CFR 100.11, “Determination of Exclusion Area, Low Population Zone, and Population Center Distance”; 10 CFR 50.67, “Accident Source Term”; 10 CFR 50.34(a)(1)(iv); General Design Criterion 19, “Control Room,” of Appendix A, “General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,” to 10 CFR Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities”) and in subsequent staff guidance. General Design Criteria (GDCs) are applicable to light- water reactors (LWRs). Non-LWRs will have principal design criteria (PDCs) which may have a similar requirement. MELCOR is the state-of-the-art computer code developed by Sandia National Laboratories for NRC to perform nuclear reactor severe accident progression and source term analyses. MELCOR is a flexible, integrated computer code designed to characterize and track the evolution of severe accidents, and the transport of associated radionuclides within a confinement such as a containment or building. It is a knowledge repository comprised of hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of experiments and model development, with particular focus on LWR phenomenology as well as extended
Recommended publications
  • ESTIMATION of FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE in URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by Wuzter A
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-4823 - - .- j (2. -1 "-0 -5 M 0-- N t+=$j oo w- P LOAN COPY: RET rm 3 d z c 4 c/) 4 z ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by WuZter A. PuuZson una Roy H. Springborn Lewis Reseurcb Center Clevelund, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 1968 i 1 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM I 111111 lllll IllH llll lilll1111111111111 Ill1 01317Lb NASA TN D-4823 ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS By Walter A. Paulson and Roy H. Springborn Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTl price $3.00 ABSTRACl Fission-product gas pressure in macroscopic voids was calculated over the tempera- ture range of 1000 to 2500 K for clad uranium dioxide fuel elements operating in a fast neutron spectrum. The calculated fission-product yields for uranium-233 and uranium- 235 used in the pressure calculations were based on experimental data compiled from various sources. The contributions of cesium, rubidium, and other condensible fission products are included with those of the gases xenon and krypton. At low temperatures, xenon and krypton are the major contributors to the total pressure. At high tempera- tures, however, cesium and rubidium can make a considerable contribution to the total pressure. ii ESTIMATION OF FISSION-PRODUCT GAS PRESSURE IN URANIUM DIOXIDE CERAMIC FUEL ELEMENTS by Walter A. Paulson and Roy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data Iaea, Vienna, 2000 Iaea-Tecdoc-1168 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1168 Compilation and evaluation of fission yield nuclear data Final report of a co-ordinated research project 1991–1996 December 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Data Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria COMPILATION AND EVALUATION OF FISSION YIELD NUCLEAR DATA IAEA, VIENNA, 2000 IAEA-TECDOC-1168 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2000 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 2000 FOREWORD Fission product yields are required at several stages of the nuclear fuel cycle and are therefore included in all large international data files for reactor calculations and related applications. Such files are maintained and disseminated by the Nuclear Data Section of the IAEA as a member of an international data centres network. Users of these data are from the fields of reactor design and operation, waste management and nuclear materials safeguards, all of which are essential parts of the IAEA programme. In the 1980s, the number of measured fission yields increased so drastically that the manpower available for evaluating them to meet specific user needs was insufficient. To cope with this task, it was concluded in several meetings on fission product nuclear data, some of them convened by the IAEA, that international co-operation was required, and an IAEA co-ordinated research project (CRP) was recommended. This recommendation was endorsed by the International Nuclear Data Committee, an advisory body for the nuclear data programme of the IAEA. As a consequence, the CRP on the Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data was initiated in 1991, after its scope, objectives and tasks had been defined by a preparatory meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Fission Product Yield Determination in the Usgs
    RELATIVE FISSION PRODUCT YIELD DETERMINATION IN THE USGS TRIGA MARK I REACTOR by Michael A. Koehl © Copyright by Michael A. Koehl, 2016 All Rights Reserved A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Nuclear Engineering). Golden, Colorado Date: ____________________ Signed: ________________________ Michael A. Koehl Signed: ________________________ Dr. Jenifer C. Braley Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date: ____________________ Signed: ________________________ Dr. Mark P. Jensen Professor and Director Nuclear Science and Engineering Program ii ABSTRACT Fission product yield data sets are one of the most important and fundamental compilations of basic information in the nuclear industry. This data has a wide range of applications which include nuclear fuel burnup and nonproliferation safeguards. Relative fission yields constitute a major fraction of the reported yield data and reduce the number of required absolute measurements. Radiochemical separations of fission products reduce interferences, facilitate the measurement of low level radionuclides, and are instrumental in the analysis of low-yielding symmetrical fission products. It is especially useful in the measurement of the valley nuclides and those on the extreme wings of the mass yield curve, including lanthanides, where absolute yields have high errors. This overall project was conducted in three stages: characterization of the neutron flux in irradiation positions within the U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA Mark I Reactor (GSTR), determining the mass attenuation coefficients of precipitates used in radiochemical separations, and measuring the relative fission products in the GSTR. Using the Westcott convention, the Westcott flux, ; modified spectral index, ; neutron temperature, ; and gold-based cadmium ratiosφ were determined for various sampling√⁄ positions in the USGS TRIGA Mark I reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl-Tm-1853
    OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ORNL- TM-1853 COPY NO. - 0-C kc+- DATE -6-6-67 CFSTI RpICZiS CHEMICAL RESEARCHAND DEVELOPMENTFOR MOLTEN- SALT BREEDERREACTORS W. R. Grimes ABSTRACT kq Results of the 15-year program of chemical research and develop- .; ment for molten salt reactors are summarized in this document. These c results indicate that 7LiF-BeFz-LJFb mixtures are feasible fuels for thermal breeder reactors. Such mixtures show satisfactory phase be- havior, they are compatible with Hastelloy N and moderator graphite, and they appear to resist radiation and tolerate fission product ac- cumulation. Mixtures of 7LiF-BeF2-ThF4 similarly appear suitable as blankets for such machines. Several possible secondary coolant mix- tures are available; NaF-NaBF3 systems seem, at present, to be the most likely possibility. Gaps in the technology are presented along with the accomplish- ments, and an attempt is made to define the information (and the research and development program) needed before a Molten Salt Thermal Breeder can be operated with confidence. NOTICE This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use at the Oak Ridge National Loboratory. It is subject to revision or correction and therefore does not represent a final report. The information is not to be abstracted, reprinted or otherwise given public dis- 4 .”: semination without the approval of the ORNL potent branch, Legal and Infor- mation Control Department. ’ y a I LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepored as an occount of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nw the Commission, nor ony person octing un beholf of the Commission: A.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.2% 130,000 155M Top 1% 154 5,300
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 5,300 130,000 155M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com Chapter Fast-Spectrum Fluoride Molten Salt Reactor (FFMSR) with Ultimately Reduced Radiotoxicity of Nuclear Wastes Yasuo Hirose Abstract A mixture of NaF-KF-UF4 eutectic and NaF-KF-TRUF3 eutectic containing heavy elements as much as 2.8 g/cc makes a fast-spectrum molten salt reactor based upon the U-Pu cycle available without a blanket. It does not object breeding but a stable operation without fissile makeup under practical contingencies. It is highly integrated with online dry chemical processes based on “selective oxide precipita- tion” to create a U-Pu cycle to provide as low as 0.01% leakage of TRU and nominated as the FFMSR. This certifies that the radiotoxicity of HLW for 1500 effective full power days (EFPD) operation can be equivalent to 405 tons of depleted uranium after 500 years cooling without Partition and Transmutation (P&T). A certain amount of U-TRU mixture recovered from LWR spent fuel is loaded after the initial criticality until U-Pu equilibrium but the fixed amount of 238U only thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Template
    Proceedings of 2ndInternational Symposium on BNCT The Application of Nuclear Technology to Support National Sustainable Development: Health, Agriculture, Energy, Industry and Environment August 10-11, 2016 - Pendopo of Surakarta City Government, Surakarta - Central Java, Indonesia Original paper available at http://... pp. …–… Study on The Ability of PCMSR to Produce Valuable Isotopes as By Produce of Energy Generation Andang Widi Harto a aDepartment of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering UGM, Jln Grafika No.2, Yogyakarta, DIY, 55281, Indonesia Abstract PCMSR (Passive Compact Molten Salt Reactor) is a variant of MSR (Molten Salt Reactor) type reactors. The MSR is one type of the Advanced Nuclear Reactor types. PCMSR uses mixture of fluoride salt if liquid form in high temperature operation. The use of liquid salt fuel allows the application of on line fuel processing system. The on line fuel processing system allow extraction of several valuable fission product isotopes such as Mo- 99, Cs-137, Sr-89 etc. The capability to MSR to produce several valuable isotopes has been studied. This study based on a denaturated breeder MSR design with 920 MWth of thermal power and 500 MWe of electrical output power with the thermal efficiency of 55 %. The 232 initial composition of fuel salt is 70 % mole of LiF, 24 % mole of ThF4, 6 % mole of UF4. The enrichment level of U is 20 % mole of U-235. The study is performed by numerical calculation to solve a set of differential equations of fission product ballance. This calculation calculates fission product generation due to fission reaction and precursor decay and fission product annihilation due to decay, neutron absorption and extraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Fission Product Yield Measurements from Neutron-Induced Fission of 235,238U and 239Pu
    EPJ Web of Conferences 232, 03006 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023203006 HIAS 2019 Fission Product Yield Measurements from Neutron-Induced Fission of 235,238U and 239Pu M. A. Stoyer1;∗, A. P. Tonchev1, J. A. Silano1, M. E. Gooden2, J. B. Wilhelmy2, W. Tornow3, C. R. Howell3, F. Krishichayan3, and S. Finch3 1Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 USA 2Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA 3Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC 27708 USA Abstract. Fission product yields (FPY) are one of the most fundamental quantities that can be measured for a fissioning nucleus and are important for basic and applied nuclear physics. Recent measurements using mono-energetic and pulsed neutron beams generated using Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory’s tandem accelerator and employing a dual fission chamber setup have produced self-consistent, high-precision data critical for testing fission models for the neutron-induced fission of 235;238U and 239Pu between neutron energies of 0.5 to 15.0 MeV. These data have elucidated a low-energy dependence of FPY for several fission products using irradiations of varying lengths and neutron energies. This paper will discuss new measurements just beginning utilizing a RApid Belt-driven Irradiated Target Transfer System (RABITTS) to measure shorter- lived fission products and the time dependence of fission yields, expanding the measurements from cumulative towards independent fission yields. The uniqueness of these FPY data and the impact on the development of fission theory will be discussed. 1 Introduction Nuclear fission is a collective phenomenon in which a heavy parent nucleus splits into two daughter nuclei ei- ther spontaneously or as a result of some inducement (neu- trons, charged particles, photons, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Fission Yield Measurements from Deuterium-Tritium Fusion Produced Neutrons Using Cyclic Neutron Activation Analysis and Γ-Γ Coincidence Counting
    Fission yield measurements from deuterium-tritium fusion produced neutrons using cyclic neutron activation analysis and γ-γ coincidence counting by Bruce D. Pierson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences) in The University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Sara A. Pozzi, co-chair Assistant Professor Marek Flaska, Penn. State University, co-chair Professor, John E. Foster Larry R. Greenwood, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Assistant Professor Physics Thomas Schwarz c Bruce D. Pierson 2016 All Rights Reserved This dissertation is dedicated to my family for their unyielding patience and support throughout my graduate career. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Drs. Marek Flaska, Larry Greenwood, Amanda Prinke, Sara Pozzi, and Sean Stave for their assistance, guidance, mentorship, and revisions to written works; their support and input drastically improved the quality of the final analysis and results (between the five them, I was getting at least one form of support from each of them). I'd also like to thank Drs. Ovidiu Toader and Joe Miklos for their assistance and support in maintaining and managing the Neutron Science Laboratory. Dr. Miklos was instrumental in amending the Nuclear Science Laboratory Nuclear Regulatory Commission license that allowed me to even do the work outlined in this document. He is a good friend and cheered me on to the finish at every opportunity. Dr. Toader was an invaluable resource for tools and ideas, and even emotional support when confronted with complex problems and the, what seemed to be, near endless graduate career.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculations Related to Nuclear Fission-Product Yields
    XA9744983 _ International Atomic Energy Agency INDCCCCP1-4Q4 Distr.: L IN DC INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR DATA COMMITTEE CALCULATIONS RELATED TO NUCLEAR FISSION-PRODUCT YIELDS Three papers by E.S. Bogomolova, A.F. Grashin, A.D. Efimenko, I.B. Lukasevich Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow Translated by the IAEA August 1997 IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION, WAGRAMERSTRASSE 5. A 1400 VIENNA Reproduced by the IAEA in Austria August 1997 INDC1CCPV404 Distr.: L CALCULATIONS RELATED TO NUCLEAR FISSION-PRODUCT YIELDS Three papers by E.S. Bogomolova, A.F. Grashin, A.D. Efimenko, I.B. Lukasevich Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow Original articles in Russian published in Jadernye Konstanty (Nuclear Constants) Volumes 1-2, 1995 Translated by the IAEA August 1997 Contents The ASIND-MEPhI Library of Independent Actinide ........................................................ 7 Fission Product Yields (English translation from Yad. Konst. 1-2, 1995, p. 89) Calculation of Independent Fission Product Yields by ...................................................... 25 the Thermodynamic Method (English translation from Yad. Konst. 1-2, 1995, p. 99) Long-Lived Fission Product Yields and the Nuclear .........................................................51 Transmutation Problem (English translation from Yad. Konst. 1-2, 1995, p. 117) XA9744984 - 7 - 96-11496 (N) Translated from Russian UDC 539.173 THE ASIND-MEPhI LIBRARY OF INDEPENDENT ACTINIDE FISSION PRODUCT YIELDS E.S. Bogomolova, A.F. Grashin, A.D. Efimenko, LB. Lukasevich Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow ABSTRACT THE ASIND-MEPhI LIBRARY OF INDEPENDENT ACTINIDE FISSION PRODUCT YIELDS. This database of independent fission product yields has been set up at the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute on the basis of theoretical calculations within the framework of the super-nonequilibrium thermodynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Fuel Cycle Integrated Molten Salt Reactor for Transmuting Pu+MA from Spent LWR Fuels
    FR0202049 The Concept of Fuel Cycle Integrated Molten Salt Reactor for Transmuting Pu+MA from Spent LWR Fuels. Y. Hirose, and Y. Takashima The Kashiwa Research Laboratory, The Institute of Research and Innovation 1201, Takada, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba-ken, 277-0861 Japan. ABSTRACT Japan should need a new fuel cycle, not to save spent fuels indefinitely as the reusable resources but to consume plutonium and miner actinides orderly without conventional reprocessing. The key component is a molten salt reactor fueled with the Pu+MA (PMA) separated from LWR spent fuels using fluoride volatility method. A double-tiered once-through reactor system can burn PMA down to 5% remnant ratio, and can make PMA virtually free from the HAW to be disposed geometrically. A key issue to be demonstrated is the first of all 7 solubility behavior of trifiuoride species in the molten fuel salt of LiF-BeF2 mixture. 7 Keywords: LWR Spent Fuels, Transmuting of Pu+MA, Molten Salt Reactor, LiF-BeF2 Molten Salt Mixture, Solubility ofTrifluorides. 1- INTRODUCTION 51 LWRs are operating, 13 LWRs (4 under construction) are to be operated during the next decade, and at least 7 more LWRs are preparing to be operated by 2015 with the total capacity of 68.5 GW(e) in Japan. The nuclear power capacity in Japan increases at a linear rate of 1.5 GW(e)/y as shown in Figure 1. It is predictable that the total nuclear power capacity will reach the maximum of 90 GW(e) in 2030. Because the existing and forthcoming LWR plants will be operable for 60 years at 80% capacity factor, owing to intensive technological endeavor by utility companies and the Government, the power capacity will stay at the constant on going, if the supplement will be kept at the rate of 1.5 GW(e)/y.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactor Fuel Isotopics and Code Validation for Nuclear Applications
    ORNL/TM-2014/464 Reactor Fuel Isotopics and Code Validation for Nuclear Applications Matthew W. Francis Charles F. Weber Marco T. Pigni Approved for public release; Ian C. Gauld distribution is unlimited. September 2014 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via US Department of Energy (DOE) SciTech Connect. Website http://www.osti.gov/scitech/ Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange representatives, and International Nuclear Information System representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Today
    Cov-Nuc Energy Today 4/06/03 11:38 Page 1 Nuclear Development Nuclear Energy Today NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY 1-RefBook 20 May 2003 23/05/03 19:09 Page 1 Nuclear Development Nuclear Energy Today NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT 1-RefBook 20 May 2003 23/05/03 19:09 Page 2 Foreword All the forecasts of world energy demand for the next 50 years point towards very significant increases in consumption. A big share of this new demand will come from areas of the world where existing energy consumption is now relatively low in comparison with the OECD countries, and which are becoming increasingly integrated in the global economy. As energy demand grows, all societies worldwide will face a real challenge in providing the energy needed to feed economic growth and improve social development, while enhancing protection of the environment. In this context, it is not difficult to conclude that it is the responsibility of policy makers to establish energy policies that meet that challenge while being robust enough to cope with the risks associated with the globalisation of the world economy. Diversification, security of supply, protection of the environment and technology development are key elements of any energy policy that tries to put into the markets enough energy at a reasonable price in a sustainable way. Among the different energy sources that are contributing significantly to world supply none appears to policy makers as more complex than nuclear energy. The economic, technological and social implications of nuclear power makes any decision something that goes far beyond the normal actors of the market place.
    [Show full text]